Difference: ApprovedPlotsATLASDetector (54 vs. 55)

Revision 552017-05-09 - LudovicoPontecorvo

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 30 to 30
  Notes:
  • For the Pixel status: 3-Layers Pixel (80 M channels) - 97.5%; IBL (12 M channels) - 99.3%
Changed:
<
<
  • For Tilecal we indicate the number of cells (including gap and crack counters)
  • For CSC the number of alive channel is lower than before due to the failure of the cooling of one chamber that cannot be operated and the presence of one layer with a broken wire in another chamber
  • For RPC most inactive channels are due to HV channels that cannot be turned on because one (of several) gas gaps connected to that channel cannot be operated. Some of the disconnected channels are actually operable and can be made to work by an intervention in the cavern during TS1.
  • The number of channel for AFP has doubled since last year after the installation of the second arm
>
>
  • For Tilecal the number of cells (including gap and crack counters) are included
  • For CSC, the number of alive channel is lower than before due to the failure of the cooling of one chamber that cannot be operated and the presence of one layer with a broken wire in another chamber
  • For RPC, most inactive channels are due to HV channels that cannot be turned on because one (of several) gas gaps connected to that channel cannot be operated. Some of the disconnected channels are actually operable and can be made to work by an intervention in the cavern during TS1.
  • The number of channels for AFP has doubled since last year after the installation of the second arm
 
  • Detectors with fewer than 100 channels are not reported
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback