# Difference: JetEtmissJetPerformanceQuarkGluon ( vs. 1)

#### Revision 12012-07-20 - TancrediCarli

Line: 1 to 1
>
>
 META TOPICPARENT name="JetEtMissPublications"

# JetEtmissJetPerformanceQuarkGluon

<!-- this line is optional -->

<!-- Add an introduction here, describing the purpose of this topic. -->

# Performance of Quark/Gluon initiated jets

<!-- Add the main topic here. i.e. create some new headings as follows: -->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 [Jet response EMJES] Jet response difference of isolated light-quark initiated and gluon initiated jets as a function of the true jet pT for anti-kt jets with R = 0.4 in the barrel calorimeter. Three different calibration schemes are shown: the EM+JES calibration. Results are shown in the PYTHIA MC11 sample (solid red circles), while empty markers represent results in the PYTHIA Perugia2011 sample (open black squares) and in Herwig++ (open blue circles). Jets are labeled as light-quark initiated or gluon initiated based on the generator event record.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 [Jet response GS] Jet response difference of isolated light-quark initiated and gluon initiated jets as a function of the true jet pT for anti-kt jets with R = 0.4 in the barrel calorimeter. Three different calibration schemes are shown: the GS calibration. Results are shown in the PYTHIA MC11 sample (solid red circles), while empty markers represent results in the PYTHIA Perugia2011 sample (open black squares) and in Herwig++ (open blue circles). Jets are labeled as light-quark initiated or gluon initiated based on the generator event record.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 [Jet response LCW+JES] Jet response difference of isolated light-quark initiated and gluon initiated jets as a function of the true jet pT for anti-kt jets with R = 0.4 in the barrel calorimeter. Three different calibration schemes are shown: the LCW+JES calibration. Results are shown in the PYTHIA MC11 sample (solid red circles), while empty markers represent results in the PYTHIA Perugia2011 sample (open black squares) and in Herwig++ (open blue circles). Jets are labeled as light-quark initiated or gluon initiated based on the generator event record.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity] Distributions of the number of tracks associated to a jet for isolated light-quark induced and gluon induced jets with 160
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

 [Track Width] Distributions of the track width for isolated light-quark induced and gluon induced jets with 160
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity vs pt, MC based] Average number of track associated to a jet for light-quark- (closed markers) and gluon-induced (empty markers) jets as a function of the reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for PYTHIA MC11 (circles), PYTHIA Perugia2011 (triangles) and Herwig++ (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track width vs pt, MC based] Average track width for light-quark- (closed markers) and gluon-induced (empty markers) jets as a function of the reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for PYTHIA MC11 (circles), PYTHIA Perugia2011 (triangles) and Herwig++ (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity vs pt, in situ extraction in MC] Average number of tracks for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in Monte Carlo simulation (circles), labeled jets in the dijet sample (triangles) and labeled jets in the $\gamma$-jet sample (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track width vs pt, in situ extraction in MC] Average track width for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |\eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in Monte Carlo simulation (circles), labeled jets in the dijet sample (triangles) and labeled jets in the gamma-jet sample (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity vs pt, in situ extraction in data] Average track multiplicity for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles), labeled jets in the dijet sample (triangles) and labeled jets in the gamma-jet sample (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track width vs pt, in situ extraction in data] Average track width for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles), labeled jets in the dijet sample (triangles) and labeled jets in the gamma-jet sample (squares). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity vs pt, in situ extraction in data] Average track multiplicity for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles), and labeled jets in the dijet Herwig++ sample (triangles). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track width vs pt, in situ extraction in data] Average track width for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles), and labeled jets in the dijet Herwig++ sample (triangles). The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track multiplicity vs pt, in situ extraction in data, purified samples] Average track multiplicity for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles) and samples purified using event-level kinematic cuts. The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Track Width vs pt, in situ extraction in data, purified samples] Average track width for light-quark- (solid marker) and gluon-induced (open marker) jets as a function of reconstructed jet pT for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. Results are shown for distributions obtained using the in situ extraction method in data (circles) and samples purified using event-level kinematic cuts. The error bars represent only statistical uncertainties.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 [Separation efficiency] The efficiency for tagging a quark-like jet vs the rejection for gluon-like jets using a likelihood built from ntrk and track width in Monte Carlo simulation for isolated jets with |eta| < 0.8. The efficiency and rejection are derived using jets labeled with the generator event record. Right, approximate rejections and efficiencies in Pythia MC11 and data for isolated jets with p_T ~ 150 GeV and |eta| < 0.8.
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

<!-- ********************************************************* -->
<!-- Do NOT remove the remaining lines, but add requested info as appropriate-->
<!-- ********************************************************* -->

<!-- For significant updates to the topic, consider adding your 'signature' (beneath this editing box) -->
<!-- Person responsible for the page:
Or replace the complete REVINFO tag (including percentages symbols) with a name in the form TwikiUsersName -->
<!-- Once this page has been reviewed, please add the name and the date e.g. StephenHaywood - 31 Oct 2006 -->