Difference: SCTPublicResults (1 vs. 51)

Revision 512019-10-10 - KoichiNagai

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 621 to 621
 
SCT-2018-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2018-024 Current projection updates, and link error counts 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
SCT-2018-003 N/A Opto link radiation damage and stability plots 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
SCT-2019-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2019-007 Radiation damage summary plots for end of Run2 11/02/2019 06/03/2019
Changed:
<
<
>
>
SCT-2019-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2019-038 Run2 Performance summary plots for Vertex 2019 10/10/2019 09/10/2019
 

Links

Revision 502019-02-28 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 620 to 620
 
SCT-2018-001 N/A Noisy strip and disabled strip evolution - updates 17/11/2018 17/01/2018
SCT-2018-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2018-024 Current projection updates, and link error counts 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
SCT-2018-003 N/A Opto link radiation damage and stability plots 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
Added:
>
>
SCT-2019-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2019-007 Radiation damage summary plots for end of Run2 11/02/2019 06/03/2019
 

Links

Revision 492018-05-04 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 618 to 618
 
SCT-2017-003 N/A SCT p-i-n radiation damage effects 08/11/2017 08/11/2017
SCT-2017-004 N/A Currents, noise, gain and depletion evolution 16/11/2017 15/11/2017
SCT-2018-001 N/A Noisy strip and disabled strip evolution - updates 17/11/2018 17/01/2018
Changed:
<
<
SCT-2018-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2018-024 Current projection updates, and link error counts 19/04/2018 19/04/2018
>
>
SCT-2018-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2018-024 Current projection updates, and link error counts 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
SCT-2018-003 N/A Opto link radiation damage and stability plots 19/04/2018 18/04/2018
 

Links

Revision 482018-04-25 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 618 to 618
 
SCT-2017-003 N/A SCT p-i-n radiation damage effects 08/11/2017 08/11/2017
SCT-2017-004 N/A Currents, noise, gain and depletion evolution 16/11/2017 15/11/2017
SCT-2018-001 N/A Noisy strip and disabled strip evolution - updates 17/11/2018 17/01/2018
Added:
>
>
SCT-2018-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2018-024 Current projection updates, and link error counts 19/04/2018 19/04/2018
 

Links

Revision 472018-04-17 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 617 to 617
 
SCT-2017-002 N/A Updated bandwidth limitation plots, and barrel leakage currents 06/09/2017 06/09/2017
SCT-2017-003 N/A SCT p-i-n radiation damage effects 08/11/2017 08/11/2017
SCT-2017-004 N/A Currents, noise, gain and depletion evolution 16/11/2017 15/11/2017
Added:
>
>
SCT-2018-001 N/A Noisy strip and disabled strip evolution - updates 17/11/2018 17/01/2018
 

Links

Revision 462017-11-16 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 616 to 616
 
SCT-2017-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2017-043 ABCD Error rates as function of product of pileup and trigger rate 21/09/2017 11/09/2017
SCT-2017-002 N/A Updated bandwidth limitation plots, and barrel leakage currents 06/09/2017 06/09/2017
SCT-2017-003 N/A SCT p-i-n radiation damage effects 08/11/2017 08/11/2017
Added:
>
>
SCT-2017-004 N/A Currents, noise, gain and depletion evolution 16/11/2017 15/11/2017
 

Links

Revision 452017-11-08 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 613 to 613
 
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015
SCT-2016-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-032 Hit Efficiency, leakage currents, noise and detector status at start of 2016 23/05/2016 23/05/2016
SCT-2016-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-065 Bandwidth limits, IPIN trends, SEU effects on chip occupancy, long term link noise and gain, long term current and depletion projections, noisy strips and active strips 21/09/2016 21/09/2016
Changed:
<
<
SCT-2017-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2017-043 ABCD Error rates as function of product of pileup and trigger rate 21/09/2016 11/09/2017
SCT-2017-002   Updated bandwidth limitation plots, and barrel leakage currents 06/09/2016 06/09/2017
>
>
SCT-2017-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2017-043 ABCD Error rates as function of product of pileup and trigger rate 21/09/2017 11/09/2017
SCT-2017-002 N/A Updated bandwidth limitation plots, and barrel leakage currents 06/09/2017 06/09/2017
SCT-2017-003 N/A SCT p-i-n radiation damage effects 08/11/2017 08/11/2017
 

Links

Revision 442017-09-12 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 613 to 613
 
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015
SCT-2016-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-032 Hit Efficiency, leakage currents, noise and detector status at start of 2016 23/05/2016 23/05/2016
SCT-2016-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-065 Bandwidth limits, IPIN trends, SEU effects on chip occupancy, long term link noise and gain, long term current and depletion projections, noisy strips and active strips 21/09/2016 21/09/2016
Added:
>
>
SCT-2017-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2017-043 ABCD Error rates as function of product of pileup and trigger rate 21/09/2016 11/09/2017
SCT-2017-002   Updated bandwidth limitation plots, and barrel leakage currents 06/09/2016 06/09/2017
 

Links

Revision 432016-10-11 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 612 to 612
 
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 21/09/2015 21/09/2015
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015
SCT-2016-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-032 Hit Efficiency, leakage currents, noise and detector status at start of 2016 23/05/2016 23/05/2016
Added:
>
>
SCT-2016-002 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-065 Bandwidth limits, IPIN trends, SEU effects on chip occupancy, long term link noise and gain, long term current and depletion projections, noisy strips and active strips 21/09/2016 21/09/2016
 

Links

Revision 422016-05-25 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 611 to 611
 
SCT-2015-003 ATL-COM-INDET-2015-037 Early Run2 plots, before collisions: Noise, leakage current, timing 01/06/2015 28/05/2015
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 21/09/2015 21/09/2015
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015
Added:
>
>
SCT-2016-001 ATL-COM-INDET-2016-032 Hit Efficiency, leakage currents, noise and detector status at start of 2016 23/05/2016 23/05/2016
 

Links

Revision 412015-12-02 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 602 to 602
 
Deleted:
<
<

Run2 Plots

This figure shows the distributions of chip-averaged response-curve noises as of February 2013 (at the end of Run1) and October 2014 (After cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). Only modules with HV values greater than 145V are selected. For the barrels, only modules with <111> sensors are plotted, while for the end-caps, chips with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown separately. The noise levels at the start of Run2 are comparable with the values at the end of Run1.

noise_noise_10PtGain.png
High voltage current for each barrel module for each of the SCT barrel layers comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.
 
Deleted:
<
<

Barrel_HVchCurr_both.png
High voltage current for each end-cap module of the SCT end-cap A disks comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The currents of modules assembled with Hamamatsu (HPK) sensors are shown separately to modules assembled from CiS sensors. The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.
 
Changed:
<
<

ECA_HVchCurrent_both.png
High voltage current for each end-cap module of the SCT end-cap C disks comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The currents of modules assembled with Hamamatsu (HPK) sensors are shown separately to modules assembled from CiS sensors. The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.

ECC_HVchCurrent_both.png
The typical timing response for a module taken during a timing scan performed during the first 13 TeV collisions in ATLAS, when the SCT was at standby voltage (HV 50V). During the timing scan, the trigger to the front end modules was delayed in 5ns steps ranging from -20ns to +20ns relative to nominal timing. The SCT front end chip samples three consecutive time bins on receipt of a trigger. 01X (no hit in the first bin, a hit in the middle bin and anything in the third bin) is optimal for the SCT, and this plot shows the fraction of events which satisfy 01X compared to hits in any of the three bins. For this particular module, an offset of -4.8ns needs to be applied the trigger signal for this specific module , to ensure timing is optimal for Run2.

ModuleTimingFit.png
The SCT front end chip samples three consecutive time bins on receipt of a trigger. This figure shows the occupancies for each possible hit pattern during a timing scan performed during the first 13 TeV collisions in ATLAS, when the SCT was at standby voltage (HV 50V). During the timing scan, the trigger to the front end modules was delayed in 5ns steps ranging from -20ns to +20ns relative to nominal timing. 01X (010 or 011) is optimal for the SCT, so this plot indicates the status of the SCT timing for all modules before corrections are applied to the online configuration. HitPatternOffset.png

Performance Plots from May 2015

>
>

Run2 Plots

 
Public Link CDS record (ATLAS) Full Title Publication Date Approval meeting
Changed:
<
<
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 22/05/2015 28/05/2015
>
>
SCT-2015-003 ATL-COM-INDET-2015-037 Early Run2 plots, before collisions: Noise, leakage current, timing 01/06/2015 28/05/2015
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 21/09/2015 21/09/2015
 
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015

Revision 402015-12-01 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 674 to 674
 

Performance Plots from May 2015

Changed:
<
<
Public Link CDS record (ATLAS) Full Title Publication Date
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 2015/05/22
>
>
Public Link CDS record (ATLAS) Full Title Publication Date Approval meeting
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 22/05/2015 28/05/2015
SCT-2015-002 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-011 Lorentz angle data measured with the SCT detecor in the first 13TeV pp collisions 01/12/2015 30/11/2015
 

Links

Revision 392015-11-25 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 672 to 672
 
Added:
>
>

Performance Plots from May 2015

Public Link CDS record (ATLAS) Full Title Publication Date
SCT-2015-001 ATL-INDET-INT-2015-007 Hit efficiency as function of bcid during first 2015 Collisions at √s = 13 TeV 2015/05/22
 

Links

Revision 382015-06-01 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 600 to 600
 LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.png
Added:
>
>

Run2 Plots

This figure shows the distributions of chip-averaged response-curve noises as of February 2013 (at the end of Run1) and October 2014 (After cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). Only modules with HV values greater than 145V are selected. For the barrels, only modules with <111> sensors are plotted, while for the end-caps, chips with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown separately. The noise levels at the start of Run2 are comparable with the values at the end of Run1.

noise_noise_10PtGain.png
High voltage current for each barrel module for each of the SCT barrel layers comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.

Barrel_HVchCurr_both.png
High voltage current for each end-cap module of the SCT end-cap A disks comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The currents of modules assembled with Hamamatsu (HPK) sensors are shown separately to modules assembled from CiS sensors. The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.

ECA_HVchCurrent_both.png
High voltage current for each end-cap module of the SCT end-cap C disks comparing currents in February 2013 (red - at the end of Run1) with September 2014 (blue - after cooling and powering the SCT again after 15 months with the SCT unpowered and at room temperature due to the Long Shutdown 1 period). The currents of modules assembled with Hamamatsu (HPK) sensors are shown separately to modules assembled from CiS sensors. The figure indicates the drop in leakage currents due to the 15 months annealing at room temperature.

ECC_HVchCurrent_both.png
The typical timing response for a module taken during a timing scan performed during the first 13 TeV collisions in ATLAS, when the SCT was at standby voltage (HV 50V). During the timing scan, the trigger to the front end modules was delayed in 5ns steps ranging from -20ns to +20ns relative to nominal timing. The SCT front end chip samples three consecutive time bins on receipt of a trigger. 01X (no hit in the first bin, a hit in the middle bin and anything in the third bin) is optimal for the SCT, and this plot shows the fraction of events which satisfy 01X compared to hits in any of the three bins. For this particular module, an offset of -4.8ns needs to be applied the trigger signal for this specific module , to ensure timing is optimal for Run2.

ModuleTimingFit.png
The SCT front end chip samples three consecutive time bins on receipt of a trigger. This figure shows the occupancies for each possible hit pattern during a timing scan performed during the first 13 TeV collisions in ATLAS, when the SCT was at standby voltage (HV 50V). During the timing scan, the trigger to the front end modules was delayed in 5ns steps ranging from -20ns to +20ns relative to nominal timing. 01X (010 or 011) is optimal for the SCT, so this plot indicates the status of the SCT timing for all modules before corrections are applied to the online configuration. HitPatternOffset.png
 
Line: 765 to 835
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722653" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" size="992164" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722642" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" size="63643" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722642" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" size="41690" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_HVchCurr_both.png" attr="" comment="" date="1433184080" name="Barrel_HVchCurr_both.png" path="Barrel_HVchCurr_both.png" size="227352" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ECA_HVchCurrent_both.png" attr="" comment="" date="1433184081" name="ECA_HVchCurrent_both.png" path="ECA_HVchCurrent_both.png" size="178175" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ECC_HVchCurrent_both.png" attr="" comment="" date="1433184083" name="ECC_HVchCurrent_both.png" path="ECC_HVchCurrent_both.png" size="171107" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="HitPatternOffset.png" attr="" comment="" date="1433184935" name="HitPatternOffset.png" path="HitPatternOffset.png" size="34042" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_noise_10PtGain.png" attr="" comment="" date="1433184085" name="noise_noise_10PtGain.png" path="noise_noise_10PtGain.png" size="105365" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ModuleTimingFit.png" attr="" comment="Typical timing curve for a module" date="1433184503" name="ModuleTimingFit.png" path="ModuleTimingFit.png" size="42248" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 372014-09-26 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 579 to 579
  Almost all of the above plots are available in very latest form in the SCT Performance Paper
Added:
>
>
Other plots are listed below.

Maximum sustainable level-1 trigger rate for the transfer of data from front-end chip to ROD as a function of the mean number of interactions per bunch crossing, μ. Values are calculated from measured event sizes in pp interactions at √{s} = 14 TeV assuming 90% of the available data-link bandwidth is used. Each link is shown as a separate curve. Increasing numbers of superimposed curves are indicated by changes of colour from blue through green and yellow to red. The dashed lines indicate the typical anticipated maximum first level trigger rate of 100kHz. LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png
Maximum sustainable level-1 trigger rate for the transfer of data from the ROD to ATLAS DAQ chain as a function of the mean number of interactions per bunch crossing, μ. Values are calculated from measured event sizes in pp interactions at √{s} = 14 TeV assuming 90% of the available data-link bandwidth is used. Each link is shown as a separate curve. Increasing numbers of superimposed curves are indicated by changes of colour from blue through green and yellow to red. The dashed lines indicate the typical anticipated maximum first level trigger rate of 100kHz. LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.png
 

Links

Line: 735 to 759
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.eps" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.eps" path="barrel_occupancy.eps" size="17798" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.pdf" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.pdf" path="barrel_occupancy.pdf" size="20520" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.png" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.png" path="barrel_occupancy.png" size="16396" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.pdf" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722657" name="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.pdf" path="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.pdf" size="229866" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.png" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722654" name="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.png" path="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.png" size="37277" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.gif" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722654" name="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.gif" path="LimitRateInModifiedCondensedAsAFunctionOfMu.gif" size="20907" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722653" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.pdf" size="992164" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722642" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.png" size="63643" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" attr="" comment="Rate limit plots for 14TeV and 25ns" date="1411722642" name="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" path="LimitRateForLinkAsAFunctionOfMu_removed_2.gif" size="41690" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 362014-06-16 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 14 to 14
 Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Please note that the original plots, often in multiple formats, are attached to this page in the attachements tab at the bottom.
Changed:
<
<

Plots up to 2012

>
>

Obsolete Plots up to 2012

All plots listed in this section relate to very early Run-1 data and are therefore obsolete. They should not now be used in conferences or papers. They are still listed here for information only.

 
Line: 573 to 575
 
Added:
>
>

2014 Performance Paper Plots

Almost all of the above plots are available in very latest form in the SCT Performance Paper

 

Links

Revision 352013-11-19 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 561 to 561
 OneSide_with_nBad.png
Added:
>
>
The mean occupancy of the barrel layers vs pileup. The data below a pileup of 40 were taken at 7TeV. The data above 40 were taken in special high pileup runs at 8TeV with just a few bunches. barrel_occupancy.png
 
Line: 716 to 726
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.png" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.png" path="OneSide_with_nBad.png" size="34984" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" path="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" size="12989" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" path="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" size="15753" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.eps" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.eps" path="barrel_occupancy.eps" size="17798" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.pdf" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.pdf" path="barrel_occupancy.pdf" size="20520" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="barrel_occupancy.png" attr="" comment="Barrel occupancy vs pileup" date="1384864208" name="barrel_occupancy.png" path="barrel_occupancy.png" size="16396" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 342013-11-12 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 252 to 252
  In this plot, the HV current measured in the HV power supply of the ATLAS SCT barrel modules are shown by points at four SCT barrel layers (B3 to B6) . The data were taken when the LHC beams were off. Assuming that all HV currents are due to generation current in the silicon bulk, they are converted to those at the temperature of 0oC using the temperature scaling formula with effective energy Egen =1.21 eV [1]. The predicted leakage currents by the Hamburg /Dortmund model are shown by four lines with colored bands indicating 1 sigma uncertainties, which is obtained by quadratically summing up all uncertainties of the model parameters as well as the temperature measurements. The prediction takes into account of self-annealing effects using the measured sensor temperatures shown at the top of plots. The prediction is based on the total 7 and 8-TeV collision luminosities delivered at Point-1, shown by the black solid line. Results of the FLUKA simulation [2] of minimum bias events at 7 TeV pp collisions (with 5% up at 8 TeV) are used to convert the collision luminosity to 1 MeV neutron-equivalent fluence at each layer. The error of the FLUKA simulation is not included in the estimate of 1 sigma uncertainty. Very good agreements between data and predictions are observed over 4 decades in leakage current as well as over 3 year, indicating (1) observed HV currents are mostly due to bulk generation current, (2) the leakage current models with self-annealing terms are well applicable and (3) the flux simulation is reasonable. In conclusion, the leakage current is one of good measures for the radiation levels at the SCT region.
Changed:
<
<
[1] A.Chilingarov, RD50 Technical Note RD50-2011-01,
>
>
[1] A.Chilingarov, RD50 Technical Note 2013_JINST_8_P10003,
  [2] https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/BenchmarkingAtTheLHC.

Revision 332013-09-02 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 542 to 542
 
Added:
>
>

Performance

The mean intrinsic hit efficiency for each layer of the SCT measured in 8 TeV proton-proton collisions. The hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 200805 on 5th April 2012, with a mean number of interactions per bunch crossing below one. The efficiency is measured using inner detector tracks with a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV and at least 6 SCT hits other than the one under consideration. The blue line and right-hand axis indicates the fraction of disabled strips in each layer. OneSide_with_nBad.png
 

Links

Line: 691 to 713
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.png" path="ActiveStrips.png" size="23598" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.eps" path="ActiveStrips.eps" size="16106" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.pdf" path="ActiveStrips.pdf" size="35561" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.png" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.png" path="OneSide_with_nBad.png" size="34984" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" path="OneSide_with_nBad.eps" size="12989" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1378123628" name="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" path="OneSide_with_nBad.pdf" size="15753" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 322013-08-26 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png

Revision 312013-08-23 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 461 to 461
 
Added:
>
>
Total number of active strips as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of strips, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of the detector in %. The runs with fewer than 98.5% of strips active correspond to periods when a cooling loop was off, so the modules served by that loop could not be powered. The runs at the end of 2010 with ~98.6% strips active correspond to a period when a TX fibre connector was broken, affecting 12 modules.

ActiveStrips.png
 Number of disabled modules as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of modules, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of
Line: 673 to 688
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377100175" name="NoisyStripsMon.png" path="NoisyStripsMon.png" size="22743" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377100173" name="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" path="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" size="35594" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377100173" name="NoisyStripsMon.eps" path="NoisyStripsMon.eps" size="15779" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.png" path="ActiveStrips.png" size="23598" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.eps" path="ActiveStrips.eps" size="16106" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveStrips.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377260536" name="ActiveStrips.pdf" path="ActiveStrips.pdf" size="35561" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 302013-08-21 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 455 to 455
 
Added:
>
>

Configuration

Number of disabled modules as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of modules, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of the detector in %. The numbers include 13 modules on the outermost disk of endcap C which are disabled permanently due to an inaccessible leak in one cooling loop. The runs with more than 60 disabled modules correspond to periods when a cooling loop was off, so the modules served by that loop could not be powered. The runs at the end of 2010 with around 40 disabled modules correspond to a period when a TX fibre connector was broken, affecting 12 modules. The variations late in 2010 and throughout 2011 correspond to TX deaths where we could not use redundancy; in those cases the module was disabled until the TX was replaced. ModOut.png
Number of disabled readout chips as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of chips, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of the detector in %. The numbers exclude chips on disabled modules. The majority of the disabled chips (roughly 2/3) are on barrel modules read out through one link; in this case, the master chip on the side with the non-functioning link cannot be read out. NEED TO ADD SOMETHING ABOUT RISE. BadChips.png
Number of disabled individual strips as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of strips, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of the detector in %. The numbers exclude strips in disabled modules and whole chips. The most common reason for disabling a strip is excessive noise. Once a strip has been disabled, no attempt is made to re-enable it. The occasional dips seen in the number correspond to runs where extra modules were disabled, for example due to a cooling loop failure, so any individual disabled strips in these modules are not counted in this plot. BadStripsConfig.png
Number of noisy strips determined offline in the prompt calibration loop as a function of time from the start of data-taking in 2010 to the end of data-taking in 2013. One point is plotted for each physics run with at least one hour of stable beam. The left-hand axis shows the number of strips, and the right-hand axis the corresponding fraction of the detector in %. A noisy strip is defined as one with an average occupancy of more than 1.5% in empty bunch-crossings. Strips which were noisy, or showed other problems, in the previous online calibration run are excluded. The rate of noisy strips is observed to rise with luminosity, as radiation affects the effective readout thresholds. Often whole chips are affected, leading to large run-to-run fluctuations in the number of noisy strips. The number is relatively stable during the periods of heavy-ion running at the end of 2011 and in 2013, when the luminosity was relatively low. NoisyStripsMon.png
 

Links

Line: 589 to 661
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376653673" name="noise_166544-216516.png" path="noise_166544-216516.png" size="116083" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376653671" name="noise_166544-216516.pdf" path="noise_166544-216516.pdf" size="257611" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376653665" name="noise_166544-216516.eps" path="noise_166544-216516.eps" size="507021" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadChips.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377099170" name="BadChips.png" path="BadChips.png" size="19077" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadChips.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377099170" name="BadChips.pdf" path="BadChips.pdf" size="28916" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadChips.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377099170" name="BadChips.eps" path="BadChips.eps" size="15658" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadStripsConfig.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377099170" name="BadStripsConfig.png" path="BadStripsConfig.png" size="22611" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadStripsConfig.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377099169" name="BadStripsConfig.pdf" path="BadStripsConfig.pdf" size="29972" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BadStripsConfig.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377099169" name="BadStripsConfig.eps" path="BadStripsConfig.eps" size="15996" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ModOut.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377099169" name="ModOut.png" path="ModOut.png" size="21366" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ModOut.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377099169" name="ModOut.pdf" path="ModOut.pdf" size="29964" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ModOut.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377099168" name="ModOut.eps" path="ModOut.eps" size="16964" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.png" attr="" comment="" date="1377100175" name="NoisyStripsMon.png" path="NoisyStripsMon.png" size="22743" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1377100173" name="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" path="NoisyStripsMon.pdf" size="35594" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="NoisyStripsMon.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1377100173" name="NoisyStripsMon.eps" path="NoisyStripsMon.eps" size="15779" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 292013-08-16 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 289 to 289
 

Plots added from 2013

Added:
>
>

Leakage Currents and Temperatures

 

Line: 384 to 386
 
Added:
>
>

Noise and Gain

Change of the chip-averaged noises as a function of chip numbers, during second half of year 2010 (top) and from 2011 to 2012(bottom) for Barrel layer B3. Noises of the modules with <100> crystal orientation are separately plotted, showing negligible dependence on chip numbers. The noise mystariously decreased by about 7% in late 2010 when the fluence level was at about 1.e10 cm-2, a few Gy. Such noise drops strongly depended on the strip location as shown by the chip-number dependence in the top plot, while such initial decrease stopped and the strong chip-number dependence disappered in 2011 and 2012 shown in bottom plot. noise_glass.png
Time dependence of integrated luminosityuminosity(top), input equivalent noise charges ENC(middle) and gains of front-end amplifiers(bottom) from March 2010 till December 2012. Modules are divided into ten different groups according as module types, crystal orientations of <111> vs <100> and sensor manufactures of Hamamatsu vs CiS. ENCs and gains are the results of the 3-point gain calibration scans. noise_gain.png
This figure shows the module-averaged noises (ENCs) of all end-cap modules, taken in a response curve test in December 2012. Modules of side-A and side-C with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are marked with different colors. Noticeable enhancement of noise is seen in the middle modules with CiS sensors. noise_EC_216516.png
The figure shows the distributions of module-averaged responce-curve noises (ENCs) as of October 2010 for end-cap outer, middle and inner layers. Modules of sides A and C and those with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown in different colors. ENCs of the middle short modules in disk 8 is plotted using right scale. noise_EC_166544.png
The figure shows the distributions of module-averaged responce-curve noises (ENCs) as of December 2012 for Barrel layers B3 to B6. ENCs of modules with <100> sensors are shown by blue points, systematically lower that those with <111> sensors (red). noise_Barrel_216516.png
The figure shows the distributions of chip-averaged responce-curve noises as of October 2010 (top) and December 2012 (bottom). Only modules with HV values greater than 145V are selected. For the barrels, only modules with <111> sensors are plotted, while for the end-caps, chips with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown separately. After receiving 30 fb-1,the noises stayed nearly at the original level for barrel and end-cap outer modules, while they increased about 15% in the end-cap middle modules with CiS sensors and about 5\% in inner modules both with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors. noise_166544-216516.png
The figure shows the log-scale distributions of chip-averaged responce-curve noises as of October 2010 (top) and December 2012 (bottom). Only modules with HV values greater than 145V are selected. For the barrels, only modules with <111> sensors are plotted, while for the end-caps, chips with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown separately. After receiving 30 fb-1,the noises stayed nearly at the original level for barrel and end-cap outer modules, while they increased about 15% in the end-cap middle modules with CiS sensors and about 5\% in inner modules both with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors. noise_166544-216516_log.png
 

Links

Line: 499 to 569
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" size="448490" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" size="82896" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" size="211929" user="davidr" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_glass.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376652123" name="noise_glass.eps" path="noise_glass.eps" size="451652" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_glass.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376652114" name="noise_glass.png" path="noise_glass.png" size="133704" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_glass.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376652112" name="noise_glass.pdf" path="noise_glass.pdf" size="214401" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_gain.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376652397" name="noise_gain.png" path="noise_gain.png" size="172488" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_gain.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376652394" name="noise_gain.pdf" path="noise_gain.pdf" size="280904" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_gain.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376652389" name="noise_gain.eps" path="noise_gain.eps" size="2137469" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_216516.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376652628" name="noise_EC_216516.png" path="noise_EC_216516.png" size="233097" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_216516.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376652625" name="noise_EC_216516.pdf" path="noise_EC_216516.pdf" size="439279" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_216516.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376652618" name="noise_EC_216516.eps" path="noise_EC_216516.eps" size="3578829" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_166544.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376652932" name="noise_EC_166544.png" path="noise_EC_166544.png" size="236161" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_166544.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376652928" name="noise_EC_166544.eps" path="noise_EC_166544.eps" size="3627673" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_EC_166544.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376652866" name="noise_EC_166544.pdf" path="noise_EC_166544.pdf" size="445930" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_Barrel_216516.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376653421" name="noise_Barrel_216516.png" path="noise_Barrel_216516.png" size="184118" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_Barrel_216516.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376653420" name="noise_Barrel_216516.pdf" path="noise_Barrel_216516.pdf" size="417305" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_Barrel_216516.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376653414" name="noise_Barrel_216516.eps" path="noise_Barrel_216516.eps" size="3445110" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516_log.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376653836" name="noise_166544-216516_log.eps" path="noise_166544-216516_log.eps" size="3209759" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516_log.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376653682" name="noise_166544-216516_log.png" path="noise_166544-216516_log.png" size="126388" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376653673" name="noise_166544-216516.png" path="noise_166544-216516.png" size="116083" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376653671" name="noise_166544-216516.pdf" path="noise_166544-216516.pdf" size="257611" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="noise_166544-216516.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376653665" name="noise_166544-216516.eps" path="noise_166544-216516.eps" size="507021" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 282013-08-15 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 13 to 13
 Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Please note that the original plots, often in multiple formats, are attached to this page in the attachements tab at the bottom.
Deleted:
<
<

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 4088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.

 

Plots up to 2012

Revision 272013-08-15 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 19 to 19
 Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 4088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
Changed:
<
<

Figures

>
>

Plots up to 2012

 
Line: 292 to 292
 
Added:
>
>

Plots added from 2013

Numder of active cooling loops for SCT as a function of time from 2010 to 2012. Occasional interuptions by for example power-line cuts are seen but the recoveries have been prompt. ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.png

Distribution of the HV currents of all the barrel modules as of Dec. 5, 2012. Regular bump patterns in the layer B3 are due to one cooling loop set at higher temperature. The flat distribution along z (beam) axisi is a reflection of the flat pseudorapidity distribution of secondary particles in minimum bias events. MD20121205_LC_Barrel.png

Distribution of the HV currents of all the end-cap modules as of Dec. 5, 2012. Modules of sides C and A and those with Hamamatsu and CiS sensors are shown in different colors. The HV currents in side A are systematically larger by about 20% probably due to different sensor temperatures. MD20121205_LC_Endcap.png

Distribution of the temperatures of all the barrel modules as of Dec. 5, 2012. There are two thermistors on each module. Points labeled as link 0 (red) are for the outer hybrid circuits, while those labeled as kink 1 (blue) are for the inner hybrid circuits. The regular bumps in the layer B3 are due to one cooling loop set at higher temperature. MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.png

Distribution of the temperatures of all the end-cap modules as of Dec. 5, 2012. Each module has one thermistor to measure the temperature of the hybrid circuit. Side A and C are shown with different colors.

MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.png

Mean hybrid temperatures as a function of time (averaged every 5 days). In the endcap case, they are separately shown for sides A and C.

Tmean_5days.png

Status of the Barrel layer B3 as of Dec. 5, 2012: (Top) High Voltage, (2nd) Hybrid temperatures of link-0 and link-1, (3rd) Raw HV current per module, and (Bottom) Normalized leakage curret at 0 degree C. The left-most block in the plot corresponds to 32 modules at Eta=-6 closest to the C-side. Blue horizontal lines show HV and temperature cuts to exclude modules in the bottom plot. Regular bump patterns in the 2nd and 3rd plots are due to one cooling loop set at higher temperature. However these these bumps disappear after the temperature normalization. The flat distribution along z in the bottom plot is a reflection of the flat pseudorapidity distribution in minimum bias events. Similar flat distributions are seen in all other barrel layers. MD20121205_B3_z.png

This plot shows a typical evolution of the HV current(blue) and bias voltage(red) of one of end-cap modules with CiS sensors in late May 2012. It exhibits anomalously high and varying HV currents during beam collisions. Such poor behaviours were suppressed by setting the standby voltage to 5V (instead of 50V) and lowering the bias voltage to 80-120V for some modules. cis_current.png

This plot shows typical beam-time behaviors of bias voltages and HV currents during November 2012 runs. Modules with Hamamatsu sensors(left) show flat current profiles while those with CiS sensors(right) exibit varying current behaviors during beam times. The last run corresponds to 1-day long calibration with no beam in which all currents stayed constant.

cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png

 

Links

Line: 381 to 478
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1332412795" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" size="31497" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35811" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" attr="" comment="" date="1361537817" name="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" path="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" size="183879" user="mcmahon" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" attr="" comment="SCT BAR Leakage current history from 2010 to 2012" date="1360159490" name="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" path="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" size="82494" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.eps" attr="" comment="History of active cooling loops" date="1376574921" name="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.eps" path="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.eps" size="2493447" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.png" attr="" comment="History of active cooling loops" date="1376574921" name="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.png" path="ActiveCoolingLoops_sct.png" size="87534" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376575293" name="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.pdf" path="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.pdf" size="363916" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376575293" name="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.eps" path="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.eps" size="2886521" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376575291" name="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.png" path="MD20121205_LC_Barrel.png" size="155254" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376575445" name="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.eps" path="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.eps" size="3219324" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376575445" name="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.pdf" path="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.pdf" size="393473" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376575445" name="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.png" path="MD20121205_LC_Endcap.png" size="192680" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376575633" name="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.png" path="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.png" size="246507" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376575633" name="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.eps" path="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.eps" size="3547481" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376575633" name="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.pdf" path="MD20121205_Temp_Barrel.pdf" size="468227" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376575735" name="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.eps" path="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.eps" size="3303571" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376575735" name="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.pdf" path="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.pdf" size="396654" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376575734" name="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.png" path="MD20121205_Temp_Endcap.png" size="206860" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Tmean_5days.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376575897" name="Tmean_5days.eps" path="Tmean_5days.eps" size="2578028" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Tmean_5days.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376575896" name="Tmean_5days.pdf" path="Tmean_5days.pdf" size="333967" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Tmean_5days.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376575896" name="Tmean_5days.png" path="Tmean_5days.png" size="143219" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_B3_z.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376576009" name="MD20121205_B3_z.pdf" path="MD20121205_B3_z.pdf" size="310593" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_B3_z.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376576009" name="MD20121205_B3_z.eps" path="MD20121205_B3_z.eps" size="574899" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MD20121205_B3_z.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376576110" name="MD20121205_B3_z.png" path="MD20121205_B3_z.png" size="150762" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376576167" name="cis_current.png" path="cis_current.png" size="122218" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376576167" name="cis_current.pdf" path="cis_current.pdf" size="250035" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376576167" name="cis_current.eps" path="cis_current.eps" size="497307" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.eps" size="448490" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.png" size="82896" user="davidr" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1376576310" name="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" path="cis_current_Hamamatsu-CiS.pdf" size="211929" user="davidr" version="1"

Revision 262013-06-17 - DaveRobinson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png

Revision 252013-02-22 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 381 to 381
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" attr="" comment="" date="1332412760" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" size="30819" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35577" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1332412776" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" size="26799" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35797" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1332412795" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" size="31497" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35811" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" attr="" comment="SCT-BAR Leakage Current to end 2012" date="1360159426" name="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" path="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" size="187097" user="mcmahon" version="1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" attr="" comment="" date="1361537817" name="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" path="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" size="183879" user="mcmahon" version="2"
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" attr="" comment="SCT BAR Leakage current history from 2010 to 2012" date="1360159490" name="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" path="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" size="82494" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 242013-02-06 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 254 to 254
 
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details
Changed:
<
<
here. Plot above updated in December 2011.
>
>
here. Plot updated in January 2013.
 
Changed:
<
<
In this plot, the HV current measured in the HV power supply of the ATLAS SCT barrel modules are shown by points at four layers (B3 to B6) . Assuming that all HV currents are due to generation current in the silicon bulk, they are converted to those at the temperature of 0oC using the temperature scaling formula with effective energy Egen =1.21 eV [1]. The predicted leakage currents by the Hamburg /Dortmund model are shown by four lines with colored bands indicating 1s uncertainties. The prediction takes into account of self-annealing effects using the measured sensor temperatures shown at the top of plots. The prediction is based on the total 7-TeV collision luminosity delivered at Point-1, shown by the black solid line. Results of the FLUKA simulation of minimum bias events at 7 TeV pp collisions are used to convert the collision luminosity to 1 MeV neutron-equivalent fluence at each layer. The uncertainty of the simulation is not included. Fairly good agreements between data and predictions are observed indicating (1) the flux simulation is reasonable and (2) observed HV currents are mostly due to bulk generation current. [1] See A.Chilingarov, RD50 Technical Note RD50-2011-01.
>
>
In this plot, the HV current measured in the HV power supply of the ATLAS SCT barrel modules are shown by points at four SCT barrel layers (B3 to B6) . The data were taken when the LHC beams were off. Assuming that all HV currents are due to generation current in the silicon bulk, they are converted to those at the temperature of 0oC using the temperature scaling formula with effective energy Egen =1.21 eV [1]. The predicted leakage currents by the Hamburg /Dortmund model are shown by four lines with colored bands indicating 1 sigma uncertainties, which is obtained by quadratically summing up all uncertainties of the model parameters as well as the temperature measurements. The prediction takes into account of self-annealing effects using the measured sensor temperatures shown at the top of plots. The prediction is based on the total 7 and 8-TeV collision luminosities delivered at Point-1, shown by the black solid line. Results of the FLUKA simulation [2] of minimum bias events at 7 TeV pp collisions (with 5% up at 8 TeV) are used to convert the collision luminosity to 1 MeV neutron-equivalent fluence at each layer. The error of the FLUKA simulation is not included in the estimate of 1 sigma uncertainty. Very good agreements between data and predictions are observed over 4 decades in leakage current as well as over 3 year, indicating (1) observed HV currents are mostly due to bulk generation current, (2) the leakage current models with self-annealing terms are well applicable and (3) the flux simulation is reasonable. In conclusion, the leakage current is one of good measures for the radiation levels at the SCT region. [1] A.Chilingarov, RD50 Technical Note RD50-2011-01, [2] https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/BenchmarkingAtTheLHC.
 

<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" alt="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" alt="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" width='500' />
 
Added:
>
>

Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details here. Plot updated in January 2013.

This plot shows the leakage current distribution of the SCT modules of four barrel layers (B3 to B6) on Dec 5, 2012 when the LHC beam off. Out of 2112 barrel modules, 2060 modules (97.5%) satisfy the cuts of HV=150+5-2V with reasonable hybrid temperatures. The currents measured by the HV PS are converted to those at the temperature of 0oC using the temperature scaling formula. The leakage currents are plotted in 12 groups, each of which contains all the modules placed at the same z (beam direction) position. Values of modules in each group are plotted in series starting from 0 to 360 degree in phi direction. The distribution of currents is very flat along z (eta) except for B3 in which the central part (|z| < 30 cm) shows about 7% excess. This flat distribution is a good reflection of the flat eta distribution of secondary particles around the center of the minimum bias events.

LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png
 
This table demonstrates the rate limitations of the SCT for various occupancies. It shows that at 1% link occupancy
Line: 361 to 381
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" attr="" comment="" date="1332412760" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" size="30819" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35577" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1332412776" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" size="26799" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35797" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1332412795" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" size="31497" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35811" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" attr="" comment="SCT-BAR Leakage Current to end 2012" date="1360159426" name="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" path="LeakCurrentDistribution_2012End.png" size="187097" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" attr="" comment="SCT BAR Leakage current history from 2010 to 2012" date="1360159490" name="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" path="LeakCurrent_2010_2012.png" size="82494" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 232012-03-22 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 160 to 158
 
Added:
>
>
 
The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT Barrel. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted.
Line: 167 to 166
 src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" alt="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" width='500' />
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-A. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted. SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted. <img
Line: 212 to 208
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
This plot shows the fraction of SCT module sides that are reporting errors as a function of time (run number) for the data taken in 2010. The error rate is very low and there is no strong evidence of an increase with increasing luminosity. The report summarizing this can be found here.
Line: 221 to 217
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 

This plot shows a breakdown of the different types of error for the data taken in 2010 as seen on the previous plot. It shows that the total fraction of data with errors in the run period was less than 0.25%. The fraction of data with each kind of error can be found in corresponding bins.The report summarizing this can be found

Line: 230 to 226
 src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Error2.gif" alt="Error2.gif" width='500' />
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
This plot is one of many summarizing the SCT timing scan done in 2010. The report summarizing this can be found here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots.
Line: 238 to 234
 src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Timing1.gif" alt="Timing1.gif" width='500' />
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
This plot is one of many summarizing the performance of the FSI in 2010. The report summarizing this can be found here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots.
Line: 247 to 243
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
This plot shows a history of the SCT occupancy measured in the ROS in a typical run in 2010. here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots.
Line: 255 to 251
 src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCTOcc.GIF" alt="SCTOcc.GIF" width='500' />
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details here. Plot above updated in December 2011.
Line: 269 to 264
 src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" alt="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" width='500' />
Changed:
<
<
>
>
 
This table demonstrates the rate limitations of the SCT for various occupancies. It shows that at 1% link occupancy that the event size is 2 kB/ROD and that SCT rate limitation is dominated by the S-links at a value of 89Khz.

Revision 222012-03-22 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 259 to 259
 
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details
Changed:
<
<
here. Please go to this location to pick up more details and plots. This plot was updated 29th September 2011.
leak_current_20110814.GIF
>
>
here. Plot above updated in December 2011.

In this plot, the HV current measured in the HV power supply of the ATLAS SCT barrel modules are shown by points at four layers (B3 to B6) . Assuming that all HV currents are due to generation current in the silicon bulk, they are converted to those at the temperature of 0oC using the temperature scaling formula with effective energy Egen =1.21 eV [1]. The predicted leakage currents by the Hamburg /Dortmund model are shown by four lines with colored bands indicating 1s uncertainties. The prediction takes into account of self-annealing effects using the measured sensor temperatures shown at the top of plots. The prediction is based on the total 7-TeV collision luminosity delivered at Point-1, shown by the black solid line. Results of the FLUKA simulation of minimum bias events at 7 TeV pp collisions are used to convert the collision luminosity to 1 MeV neutron-equivalent fluence at each layer. The uncertainty of the simulation is not included. Fairly good agreements between data and predictions are observed indicating (1) the flux simulation is reasonable and (2) observed HV currents are mostly due to bulk generation current. [1] See A.Chilingarov, RD50 Technical Note RD50-2011-01.

 
Deleted:
<
<
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details here. Plot above updated in December 2011.
 
<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Barrel_leak_current_201112.PNG" alt="Barrel_leak_current_201112.PNG" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" alt="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" width='500' />
 
Line: 366 to 363
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500618" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" size="28576" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19408" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331501084" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" size="19156" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19259" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331501142" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" size="30675" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19221" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" attr="" comment="" date="1332412760" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" size="30819" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35577" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1332412776" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" size="26799" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35797" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1332412795" name="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" path="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" size="31497" stream="Barrel_log_2011end_2.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp35811" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 212012-03-11 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 38 to 38
 

Changed:
<
<
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. We note that the minimum of the distribution is, in each case displaced, from the zero by the measured Lorentz angle. The value of the minimum with the associated systematic errors are presented in the next plot. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
>
>
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. We note that the minimum of the distribution is, in each case displaced, from the zero by the measured Lorentz angle. The value of the minimum with the associated systematic errors are presented in the next plot. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.This plot is now out of date and one of the ones below should be used.
 
ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg
Line: 46 to 46
 

Changed:
<
<
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
>
>
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009. This plot is now out of date and one of the ones below should be used.
 
LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg
Line: 55 to 55
 

Added:
>
>

In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the 2011 colliding beam data. For details see the document in CDS https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1385910/files/LorentzAngleUpdateOnApprovedPlots2011.pdf

data11_LAPlot.png
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the 2011 colliding beam data with Monte Carlo simulation superimposed. dataAndMC_LAPlot.png
In this plot we see the mean cluster size as a function of the incidence angle for the 4 SCT barrels. The cluser size is measured on side 0.

incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.png
In this plot we see the mean cluster size as a function of the incidence angle for the 4 SCT barrels. The cluser size is measured on side 1.

incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.png
In this plot we see the mean cluster size as a function of the incidence angle for the 4 SCT barrels. The cluser size is measured on side 0. In the same plot we also see the same distributions for the Monte Carlo simulation.

incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.png
In this plot we see the mean cluster size as a function of the incidence angle for the 4 SCT barrels. The cluser size is measured on side 1. In the same plot we also see the same distributions for the Monte Carlo simulation.

incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.png
 
In this plot we see the number of strips per module side from the 900GeV run 14291 lumiblock 11-36 compared with a 900GeV minimum bias Monte Carlo sample. The solenoid was on during this run. The number of events from the run is about 10k, and 40k for MC. Both distributions are normalized by number
Line: 292 to 347
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1317374394" name="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" path="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" size="26395" stream="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50589" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1317375047" name="leak_current_20110814.GIF" path="leak_current_20110814.GIF" size="44696" stream="leak_current_20110814.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50580" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" attr="" comment="" date="1330353369" name="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" path="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" size="30605" stream="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp25514" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="data11_LAPlot.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331500147" name="data11_LAPlot.eps" path="data11_LAPlot.eps" size="10395" stream="data11_LAPlot.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14202" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="data11_LAPlot.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1331500162" name="data11_LAPlot.gif" path="data11_LAPlot.gif" size="10643" stream="data11_LAPlot.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14438" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="data11_LAPlot.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500175" name="data11_LAPlot.pdf" path="data11_LAPlot.pdf" size="14685" stream="data11_LAPlot.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14468" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="dataAndMC_LAPlot.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331500189" name="dataAndMC_LAPlot.eps" path="dataAndMC_LAPlot.eps" size="11356" stream="dataAndMC_LAPlot.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14444" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="dataAndMC_LAPlot.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1331500202" name="dataAndMC_LAPlot.gif" path="dataAndMC_LAPlot.gif" size="12393" stream="dataAndMC_LAPlot.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14448" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="dataAndMC_LAPlot.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500216" name="dataAndMC_LAPlot.png" path="dataAndMC_LAPlot.png" size="17983" stream="dataAndMC_LAPlot.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14394" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500230" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.png" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.png" size="27587" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14438" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500266" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.pdf" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.pdf" size="28687" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14379" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500280" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.png" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.png" size="27068" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14557" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331501030" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.eps" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.eps" size="19120" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19338" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500313" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.pdf" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.pdf" size="21528" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14496" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500328" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.png" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.png" size="24180" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side0.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14497" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500341" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.pdf" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.pdf" size="21513" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14494" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500355" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.png" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.png" size="23710" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp14517" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="data11_LAPlot.png" attr="" comment="" date="1331500463" name="data11_LAPlot.png" path="data11_LAPlot.png" size="15379" stream="data11_LAPlot.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19294" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="dataAndMC_LAPlot.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500519" name="dataAndMC_LAPlot.pdf" path="dataAndMC_LAPlot.pdf" size="14968" stream="dataAndMC_LAPlot.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19371" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1331500618" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" size="28576" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side0.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19408" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331501084" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" size="19156" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_side1.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19259" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1331501142" name="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" path="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" size="30675" stream="incidentAngle_vs_nStrips_DataVsMc_side1.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp19221" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 202012-02-27 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 211 to 211
 

Added:
>
>
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details here. Plot above updated in December 2011.

Barrel_leak_current_201112.PNG
 This table demonstrates the rate limitations of the SCT for various occupancies. It shows that at 1% link occupancy that the event size is 2 kB/ROD and that SCT rate limitation is dominated by the S-links at a value of 89Khz.
<img
Line: 283 to 291
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1317374372" name="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" path="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" size="25578" stream="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50604" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1317374394" name="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" path="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" size="26395" stream="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50589" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1317375047" name="leak_current_20110814.GIF" path="leak_current_20110814.GIF" size="44696" stream="leak_current_20110814.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50580" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" attr="" comment="" date="1330353369" name="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" path="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" size="30605" stream="Barrel_leak_current_201112.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp25514" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 192011-09-30 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 26 to 26
 
The document attached to this page (SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf) details the configuration of the SCT in May 2010. Within that document you will find details of the modules, chips and strips missing from the SCT configuration in the first half of 2010. On the right hand side you can see a snapshot of one of these
Changed:
<
<
pages. Users are encouraged to copy the values from the table into their own presentations in a format that is appropriate for them.
>
>
pages. Users are encouraged to copy the values from the table into their own presentations in a format that is appropriate for them. It SHOULD BE CLEAR that this is only a snapshot and these numbers vary on a day-to-day basis. However, the level of those variations is very small indeed. It is also true that the level of the problems reported in this table have been very similar throughout most of 2011.
 
Sample.JPG

Revision 182011-09-30 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 202 to 202
 
Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details
Changed:
<
<
here. Please go to this location to pick up more details and plots.
>
>
here. Please go to this location to pick up more details and plots. This plot was updated 29th September 2011.
 
<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" alt="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/leak_current_20110814.GIF" alt="leak_current_20110814.GIF" width='500' />
 
Line: 278 to 278
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1308599273" name="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" path="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" size="72598" stream="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59442" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1308600007" name="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" path="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" size="18006" stream="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59283" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1308600693" name="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" path="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" size="13128" stream="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59329" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" attr="" comment="" date="1317374372" name="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" path="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" size="25578" stream="leak_current_20110814_log.eps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50604" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1317374394" name="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" path="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" size="26395" stream="leak_current_20110814_log.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50589" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="leak_current_20110814.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1317375047" name="leak_current_20110814.GIF" path="leak_current_20110814.GIF" size="44696" stream="leak_current_20110814.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp50580" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 172011-06-20 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 200 to 200
 
Added:
>
>

Plots concerning leakage currents, measured fluxes in SCT and RadMod. See more details here. Please go to this location to pick up more details and plots. ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF
This table demonstrates the rate limitations of the SCT for various occupancies. It shows that at 1% link occupancy that the event size is 2 kB/ROD and that SCT rate limitation is dominated by the S-links at a value of 89Khz. SCTRateLimitations.GIF
 
Line: 261 to 275
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="FSI1.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1305891320" name="FSI1.gif" path="FSI1.gif" size="109752" stream="FSI1.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27180" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTOcc.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1305891683" name="SCTOcc.JPG" path="SCTOcc.JPG" size="59476" stream="SCTOcc.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27222" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTOcc.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1305891957" name="SCTOcc.GIF" path="SCTOcc.GIF" size="29225" stream="SCTOcc.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27243" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1308599273" name="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" path="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" size="72598" stream="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59442" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1308600007" name="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" path="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" size="18006" stream="ApprovedPlotLeakgeCurrents.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59283" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1308600693" name="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" path="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" size="13128" stream="SCTRateLimitations.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp59329" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 162011-05-20 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 157 to 157
 

Changed:
<
<
The following are also approved for SCT presentations here.
>
>
This plot shows the fraction of SCT module sides that are reporting errors as a function of time (run number) for the data taken in 2010. The error rate is very low and there is no strong evidence of an increase with increasing luminosity. The report summarizing this can be found here.
 
<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" alt="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/Error1.gif" alt="Error1.gif" width='500' />

This plot shows a breakdown of the different types of error for the data taken in 2010 as seen on the previous plot. It shows that the total fraction of data with errors in the run period was less than 0.25%. The fraction of data with each kind of error can be found in corresponding bins.The report summarizing this can be found here.

Error2.gif
This plot is one of many summarizing the SCT timing scan done in 2010. The report summarizing this can be found here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots. Timing1.gif
This plot is one of many summarizing the performance of the FSI in 2010. The report summarizing this can be found here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots. FSI1.gif
This plot shows a history of the SCT occupancy measured in the ROS in a typical run in 2010. here. Please go to this location to pick up more plots. SCTOcc.GIF
 
Line: 219 to 255
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783057" name="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="25226" stream="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38262" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783066" name="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="28432" stream="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38168" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783075" name="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="28409" stream="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38184" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Error1.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1305890460" name="Error1.gif" path="Error1.gif" size="38610" stream="Error1.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp22412" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Error2.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1305890711" name="Error2.gif" path="Error2.gif" size="49391" stream="Error2.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27341" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Timing1.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1305890978" name="Timing1.gif" path="Timing1.gif" size="31652" stream="Timing1.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27244" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="FSI1.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1305891320" name="FSI1.gif" path="FSI1.gif" size="109752" stream="FSI1.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27180" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTOcc.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1305891683" name="SCTOcc.JPG" path="SCTOcc.JPG" size="59476" stream="SCTOcc.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27222" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTOcc.GIF" attr="" comment="" date="1305891957" name="SCTOcc.GIF" path="SCTOcc.GIF" size="29225" stream="SCTOcc.GIF" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp27243" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 152011-05-10 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 156 to 156
 
Changed:
<
<
>
>
The following are also approved for SCT presentations here. SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png
 

Revision 142011-04-14 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="WebHome"
 AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
Line: 90 to 92
 

Deleted:
<
<
 
Added:
>
>
 This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009.The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data. Note the single low measurement in layer 2 inner is due to a single module with a large number (748) of misbehaving strips.
Line: 100 to 103
 
Added:
>
>

The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT Barrel. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted.

SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png
The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-A. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted. SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png
The intrinsic module efficiency is shown for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C. This hit efficiency is the number of hits per possible hit, where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The data used is from run 165591 on 22-09-2010. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks: SCT stand-alone and Inner Detector combined tracks, both with the requirement of a transverse momentum of above 1 GeV. For stand-alone tracks we demand at least 7 SCT hits (not including the hit under test for efficiency) while for combined tracks at least 6 SCT Hits are required. The efficiencies in layer ‘0 inner’ and ‘3 outer’ are biased for the SCT stand-alone tracks as holes beyond the last measurement are not counted. SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png
 
Line: 182 to 206
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268754904" name="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" path="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" size="68874" stream="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39585" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1275295092" name="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" path="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" size="234194" stream="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp20790" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Sample.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1275295396" name="Sample.JPG" path="Sample.JPG" size="77649" stream="Sample.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp20682" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" attr="" comment="" date="1302782991" name="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" path="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" size="9310" stream="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38174" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" attr="" comment="" date="1302783001" name="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" path="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" size="12097" stream="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38192" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" attr="" comment="" date="1302783015" name="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" path="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" size="12099" stream="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.ps" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38255" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1302783026" name="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" path="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" size="14211" stream="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38117" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1302783034" name="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" path="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" size="15218" stream="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38266" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1302783046" name="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" path="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" size="15198" stream="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38261" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783057" name="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="25226" stream="SCTBarrel-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38262" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783066" name="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="28432" stream="SCTEndcapA-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38168" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" attr="" comment="" date="1302783075" name="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" path="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" size="28409" stream="SCTEndcapC-eff-APPROVAL2011.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp38184" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 132010-12-06 - PatrickJussel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Changed:
<
<
No permission to view Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic
<!--  
  • Set DENYTOPICVIEW =
  • Set ALLOWTOPICCHANGE = atlas-readaccess-current-physicists
-->
>
>
AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png
 

Public SCT Plots for Collision Data

Line: 20 to 16
 

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Changed:
<
<
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 4088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
>
>
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 4088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
 

Figures

Line: 28 to 24
 

Changed:
<
<
The document attached to this page (SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf) details the configuration of the SCT in May 2010. Within that document you
>
>
The document attached to this page (SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf) details the configuration of the SCT in May 2010. Within that document you
 will find details of the modules, chips and strips missing from the SCT configuration in the first half of 2010. On the right hand side you can see a snapshot of one of these pages. Users are encouraged to copy the values from the table into their own presentations in a format that is appropriate for them.
Line: 85 to 81
 
Changed:
<
<
This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-A.
>
>
This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-A.
 In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009. The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data.
SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png
Line: 96 to 92
 
Changed:
<
<
This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C.
>
>
This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C.
 In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009.The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data. Note the single low measurement in layer 2 inner is due to a single module with a large number (748) of misbehaving strips.

<img

Revision 122010-05-31 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 20 to 20
 

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Changed:
<
<
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 24088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
>
>
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 4088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
 

Figures

Line: 28 to 28
 

Added:
>
>

The document attached to this page (SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf) details the configuration of the SCT in May 2010. Within that document you will find details of the modules, chips and strips missing from the SCT configuration in the first half of 2010. On the right hand side you can see a snapshot of one of these pages. Users are encouraged to copy the values from the table into their own presentations in a format that is appropriate for them.

Sample.JPG
 
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. We note that the minimum of the distribution is, in each case displaced, from the zero by the measured Lorentz angle. The value of the minimum with the associated systematic errors are presented in the next plot. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.

<img
Line: 172 to 184
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268736986" name="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" path="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" size="13678" stream="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39682" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268754879" name="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" path="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" size="15621" stream="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39692" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268754904" name="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" path="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" size="68874" stream="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39585" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1275295092" name="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" path="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" size="234194" stream="SCTConfigurationMay2010.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp20790" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Sample.JPG" attr="" comment="" date="1275295396" name="Sample.JPG" path="Sample.JPG" size="77649" stream="Sample.JPG" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp20682" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 112010-05-10 - PatrickJussel

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
<!--  
  • Set DENYTOPICVIEW =
Added:
>
>
  • Set ALLOWTOPICCHANGE = atlas-readaccess-current-physicists
 
-->
Added:
>
>
 

Public SCT Plots for Collision Data

<!--optional-->

Revision 102010-03-16 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 111 to 111
 be correctly timed in, we hope that the mean should be between 1 and 2.

<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/text.png" alt="text.png" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" alt=" tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" width='500' />
 
Added:
>
>
tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif
 
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
Blagh blagh 2
 
Deleted:
<
<
text.png
 
Line: 167 to 168
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129313" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" size="19274" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18226" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1268736971" name="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" path="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" size="28150" stream="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39637" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268736986" name="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" path="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" size="13678" stream="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39682" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268754879" name="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" path="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" size="15621" stream="tbinprofile_142195_approved.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39692" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268754904" name="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" path="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" size="68874" stream="tbinhitmaps_142195_approved.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39585" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 92010-03-16 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 41 to 41
 
Added:
>
>
In this plot we see the number of strips per module side from the 900GeV run 14291 lumiblock 11-36 compared with a 900GeV minimum bias Monte Carlo sample. The solenoid was on during this run. The number of events from the run is about 10k, and 40k for MC. Both distributions are normalized by number of events and plotted in logarithmic scales in both axes. The plot contains all SCT modules both from barrel and end caps A good agreement is obtained for a wide range of number of strips. The discrepancy at low N arises (at least in part) from the fact that noise in simulation is lower than in data. Noise in the simulation is appropriate for read-out of one bunch-crossing. These data were taken reading out 3 BC, and the noise level is higher (by approx. a factor of 3). The plots were apprved in February 2010.

SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg
 
Line: 76 to 91
 
Added:
>
>

SCT reads out three 25ns time bins around Level-1 Accept signal. During commissioning, we run in a mode where a hit is recorded in a strip if the charge deposited is greater than the 1fC threshold in any of these time bins.We want the whole detector to be “timed in” with the trigger, so that the modules receive the Level-1 accept signal in the same bunch crossing as the particles from a collision pass through the modules. This involves applying delays to the trigger signal to compensate for the length of the optical fibres that transmit the trigger signal, and for the time-of-flight of particles from the interaction point to the module. We can fill a 3 bin histogram corresponding to whether a strip was over threshold in each of the three bunch crossings that are read out – the first bin corresponds to the bunch crossing before the Level-1 accept, the second bin is the same BC as the LVL1Accept and the third is the BC after. If we are correctly timed in, hits corresponding to tracks from a collision event should follow a “01X” pattern – i.e. nothing in the first bin, over threshold in the second bin, and no requirement on the third bin. For each event, fill one of these 3-bin timebin plots for each layer, using hits-on-track for that layer. Take the mean of this histogram, and fill this as the y-axis variable in a profile plot. Reset the histograms and repeat for all events. Therefore, the y error bars on each point represent the variances in the means of those timebin plots from event-to-event. One unit on the y-axis corresponds to 25ns, and to be correctly timed in, we hope that the mean should be between 1 and 2.

text.png

Blagh blagh 2

text.png
 
Line: 116 to 165
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129280" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" size="19135" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18196" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1261129300" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" size="15053" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18228" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129313" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" size="19274" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18226" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1268736971" name="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" path="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" size="28150" stream="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39637" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" attr="" comment="" date="1268736986" name="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" path="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" size="13678" stream="SCT_NStripPerModuleLogLog900GeV.gif" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp39682" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 82010-02-15 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 18 to 18
 

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Changed:
<
<
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 2088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
>
>
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 24088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
 

Figures

Line: 68 to 68
 

This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C.

Changed:
<
<
In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009.The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data.
>
>
In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009.The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data. Note the single low measurement in layer 2 inner is due to a single module with a large number (748) of misbehaving strips.
 
SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png

Revision 72010-02-11 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 18 to 18
 

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Changed:
<
<
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 2088 modules (99.3%). The main reasons for the 29 modules that were missing were a) A leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a varaiety of HV and LV errors.
>
>
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 2088 modules (99.3%) : 29 modules that were missing because of : a) a leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a variety of HV and LV errors.
 

Figures

Revision 62010-02-04 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 15 to 15
 Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Please note that the original plots, often in multiple formats, are attached to this page in the attachements tab at the bottom.
Added:
>
>

The SCT

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please note that in 2009 the SCT was operating with 4059 of 2088 modules (99.3%). The main reasons for the 29 modules that were missing were a) A leaking cooling loop in EndCap-C (13 modules) and 16 modules with a varaiety of HV and LV errors.

 

Figures

Revision 52009-12-18 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 13 to 13
 

Introduction

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.

Changed:
<
<
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions.
>
>
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Please note that the original plots, often in multiple formats, are attached to this page in the attachements tab at the bottom.
 

Figures

Changed:
<
<
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
>
>
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. We note that the minimum of the distribution is, in each case displaced, from the zero by the measured Lorentz angle. The value of the minimum with the associated systematic errors are presented in the next plot. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
 
ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg

Revision 42009-12-18 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 20 to 20
 

Changed:
<
<
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees.
>
>
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees. This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
 
ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg
Line: 28 to 28
 

Changed:
<
<
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.
>
>
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.This plot was approved on Wednesday 9th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Saturday 12th December 2009.
 
LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg
Line: 38 to 38
 
Changed:
<
<
This plot shows the intrinsic efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT Barrel. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors not including the hit under test for efficiency.
>
>
This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT Barrel. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009. The alignment used in this plot was derived from collision data.
 
<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" alt="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" alt="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" width='500' />
 
Added:
>
>

This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-A. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009. The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data.

SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png

This plot shows the intrinsic module efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT EndCap-C. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit where dead modules and chips are taken into account. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors (not including the hit under test for efficiency). This plot was approved on Wednesday 16th December 2009 at an open ATLAS meeting and uploaded on Friday 18th December 2009.The plot includes a preliminary alignment derived from beam data.

SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png
 
Line: 78 to 104
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260634072" name="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" path="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" size="49670" stream="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5244" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260634954" name="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" path="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" size="49670" stream="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5219" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260636241" name="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" path="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" size="55375" stream="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5187" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1261129242" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.pdf" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.pdf" size="13554" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18257" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129253" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" size="17069" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18204" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1261129269" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.pdf" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.pdf" size="14980" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18111" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129280" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" size="19135" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEA.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18196" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1261129300" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" size="15053" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18228" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" attr="" comment="" date="1261129313" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" size="19274" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTEC.18.12.09.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp18226" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 32009-12-12 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 18 to 18
 

Figures

Deleted:
<
<
A clear-cut description of the figure on the right hand side. Link to figure, or direct upload to TWiki. Please provide a png (or gif, jpg) and an eps version. Do not forget the "ATLAS preliminary" label on the plot.
... ...
 
The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees.

<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" alt="LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" alt="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" width='500' />
 
Line: 44 to 31
 
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.

<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" alt="LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" alt="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" width='500' />
 
Line: 55 to 42
 In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors not including the hit under test for efficiency.

<img
Changed:
<
<
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" alt="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" width='500' />
>
>
src="/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/SCTPublicResults/SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" alt="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" width='500' />
 

Line: 85 to 72
 

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605593" name="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" path="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" size="16216" stream="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3984" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605892" name="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" path="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" size="72079" stream="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3936" user="mcmahon" version="1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260632019" name="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" path="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" size="79760" stream="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5258" user="mcmahon" version="2"
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605986" name="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" path="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" size="75530" stream="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp4010" user="mcmahon" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" attr="" comment="" date="1260633437" name="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" path="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" size="16547" stream="SCT-summaryeff-SCTB.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5152" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260634072" name="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" path="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" size="49670" stream="LAInSCTWithCollisions.jpeg.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5244" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260634954" name="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" path="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" size="49670" stream="LorentzAngleInSCTWithBeam.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5219" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1260636241" name="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" path="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" size="55375" stream="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp5187" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 22009-12-12 - SteveMcMahon

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
Line: 30 to 30
 ...
Added:
>
>

The plot shows the SCT cluster size (in strips) plotted as a function of the track incidence angle for the 4 layers in the SCT barrel. The incidence angle is measured in degrees.

LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf
In this plot we see the value of the Lorentz angle extracted from the cluster-size vs angle plot. The extracted value is shown for collision data, cosmic ray data. Also shown are the model predictions. Note that the 4 layers are not all operated at the same temperature and this is reflected in the model prediction value. The errors shown on the data are the statistical values only.

LorentzAngleInSCTwithCollisions.pdf

This plot shows the intrinsic efficiency for tracks measured in the SCT Barrel. In these plots we show the number of hits per possible hit. The efficiency is shown for two different types of tracks; SCT stand alone and combined tracks. We demand a minimum of 20 TRT hits and 6 SCT hits in the silicon detectors not including the hit under test for efficiency.

SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf
 
Added:
>
>
 

Links

Line: 49 to 83
 Last reviewed by: Never reviewed

\ No newline at end of file

Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605593" name="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" path="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" size="16216" stream="SCTSingleHitEfficiencyWithBeam.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3984" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605892" name="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" path="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" size="72079" stream="ClusterSizevsIncidenceAngleInSCT.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3936" user="mcmahon" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1260605986" name="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" path="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" size="75530" stream="LorentzAnglesInSCTwithCollisions.pdf" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp4010" user="mcmahon" version="1"

Revision 12009-11-27 - AndreasHoecker

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="AtlasResults"
Warning
Can't INCLUDE Atlas.AtlasPublicTopic repeatedly, topic is already included.
<!--  
  • Set DENYTOPICVIEW =
-->

Public SCT Plots for Collision Data

<!--optional-->

Introduction

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions.

Figures

A clear-cut description of the figure on the right hand side. Link to figure, or direct upload to TWiki. Please provide a png (or gif, jpg) and an eps version. Do not forget the "ATLAS preliminary" label on the plot.
... ...

Links

<!--***********************************************************-->
<!--Do NOT remove the remaining lines, but add requested info as appropriate-->
<!--***********************************************************-->


<!--Please add the name of someone who is responsible for this page so that he/she can be contacted if changes are needed.
The creator's name will be added by default, but this can be replaced if appropriate.
Put the name first, without dashes.-->
Responsible: Project leaders
<!--Once this page has been reviewed, please add the name and the date e.g. StephenHaywood - 31 Oct 2006 -->
Last reviewed by: Never reviewed
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback