# Difference: PhysicsResultsSUS14016 (9 vs. 10)

#### Revision 102015-09-03 - JohannesSchulz

Line: 1 to 1

 META TOPICPARENT name="SUSYPhotonWorkingGroup"
Line: 22 to 22

Figures Caption
Figure 1: In the TChiNg scenario (left), the charginos are only slightly heavier than the neutralinos, leading to chargino to neutralino decays accompanied by soft radiation. One neutralino decays to a photon and a gravitino, where the other decays into a Z or an h boson and a gravitino with equal probability. In the TChiWg scenario (top right), the gauginos are mass-degenerate and the $\widetilde{\chi}^0_1$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^{\pm}_1$ decays are as shown. Within the GGM, the branching ratio $\widetilde{\chi}^0_1\rightarrow$ $\gamma\tilde{G}$ to $\widetilde{\chi}^0_1\rightarrow$ $Z\tilde{G}$ depends on the neutralino-mass. The dominant process for electroweak GGM production is shown in (bottom right). A small amount of hadronic energy and at least one photon and $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ are common features of the scenarios.
Figure 2: The $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss,signif}}$ (left) and $S_{\text{T}}^{\gamma}$ (right) variables are seen to span the signal region. Four search regions are formed with $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\text{miss,signif}}$ = 200 and $S_{\text{T}}^{\gamma}$ = 600 GeV partitions. A benchmark TChiNg signal point with M$_{\text{wino}}$ = 500 GeV is shown for comparison.
Changed:
<
<
 Figure 3: Exlcusion limits for the TChiNg (left) and TChiWg (right) scenario. In the TChiNg scenario NLSP masses below 570 GeV are excluded, in the TChiWg scenario NLSP masses below 680 GeV are excluded. Figure 4: Observed upper cross-section CLs limit at 95% C.L. for the GGM signal points for data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7.4 fb$^{-1}$ in theM$_{\text{wino}} -$ M$_{\text{bino}}$ plane (left). Also shown are the expected and observed exclusion contours. GGM signal points near the diagonal, e.g. for M$_{\text{wino}}$ = M$_{\text{bino}}$ + 10 GeV up to a wino mass of M$_{\text{wino}}$ = 710 GeV are excluded (right).
>
>
 Figure 3: Exlcusion limits for the TChiNg (left) and TChiWg (right) scenario. In the TChiNg scenario NLSP masses below 570 GeV are excluded, in the TChiWg scenario NLSP masses below 680 GeV are excluded. Electronic versions of limits: TChiNg_Obs.root, TChiNg_Exp.root, TChiWg_Obs.root, TChiWg_Exp.root Figure 4: Observed upper cross-section CLs limit at 95% C.L. for the GGM signal points for data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 7.4 fb$^{-1}$ in theM$_{\text{wino}} -$ M$_{\text{bino}}$ plane (left). Also shown are the expected and observed exclusion contours. GGM signal points near the diagonal, e.g. for M$_{\text{wino}}$ = M$_{\text{bino}}$ + 10 GeV up to a wino mass of M$_{\text{wino}}$ = 710 GeV are excluded (right). Electronic versions of limits: WinoBino_Exclusion.root, WinoBino_10_Obs.root, WinoBino_10_Exp.root

## Tables in the paper

Line: 51 to 51
-- JohannesSchulz - 2015-07-22
>
>

>
>

 META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Full_signal.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1437648549" name="Full_signal.pdf" path="Full_signal.pdf" size="65325" user="jschulz" version="1" attachment="TChiNg_xs.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1437648550" name="TChiNg_xs.pdf" path="TChiNg_xs.pdf" size="62844" user="jschulz" version="1"
Line: 97 to 101

 META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="TChiNg_acc.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1441109087" name="TChiNg_acc.pdf" path="TChiNg_acc.pdf" size="14585" user="jschulz" version="1" attachment="TChiwg_acc.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1441109087" name="TChiwg_acc.pdf" path="TChiwg_acc.pdf" size="16539" user="jschulz" version="1" attachment="acceptance_GGM.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1441109087" name="acceptance_GGM.pdf" path="acceptance_GGM.pdf" size="291084" user="jschulz" version="1"