Difference: RichRun2Performance (2 vs. 3)

Revision 32019-02-15 - MichaelMcCann

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="LHCbRICH"

RICH Run 2 performance paper

Line: 11 to 11
 

Available tasks

Overview Description Time estimate People
Changed:
<
<
Resolutions Conceptually simple (a gaussian peak with a background), the tricky part is dealing with the background. This could be reduced by working with low occupancy events, e.g. the low multi dimuon line, which is pretty clean. An example is here: . The difference between a flat background and a quadratic would give a systematic of 2-3%. Would hope to improve that, but maybe we just live with it. Even so relative studies can still be done, comparing the resolutions in different running conditions, for different sections of the detect, as a function of time, etc.    
>
>
Resolutions Conceptually simple (a gaussian peak with a background), the tricky part is dealing with the background. This could be reduced by working with low occupancy events, e.g. the low multi dimuon line, which is pretty clean. An example is here: . The difference between a flat background and a quadratic would give a systematic of 2-3%. Would hope to improve that, but maybe we just live with it. Even so relative studies can still be done, comparing the resolutions in different running conditions, for different sections of the detector, as a function of time, etc.    
 
Photon counting This often gets stuck in definitions of which tracks matter and what a yield is. We can pick a definition... Also there has been some success in using a a background subtraction rather than assuming a signal shape. Similar to the resolutions, relative studies can be done in space, time and conditions.    
Changed:
<
<
Calibration Studies of refractive index stability, etc. Time alignments. HPD image movements. Studies of the MDCS corrections? Mirror alignments are getting their own paper, so maybe nothing needed here?    
>
>
Calibration Studies of refractive index stability, etc. HPD image movements    
MDCS corrections Study the stability in time? Maybe formalise the psuedo data driven parameter choice (i.e. we stuck them in the mirror alignment to see what happened). I don't think data based optimisation we played with was developed far enough. Maybe the RAL studies. Donal's 3% radius correction studies didn't make it into the last paper?    
Mirror alignments Mirror alignments are getting their own paper, so maybe nothing needed here? 0 min?  
Time alignment All time alignment data has been analysed, so the minimum here is to track down the output and make a pretty plot. We could study how the timing of boards have varied throughout the years, that could be nice. 20 min - 1 day?  
 
PID performance Reuse the framework Iwan created. Again, stability in time and with conditions    

Drafts and presentations

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback