Difference: PreApprovalCommentsV1 (1 vs. 13)

Revision 132018-02-09 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 8 to 8
 
1. Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
Changed:
<
<
Questionnaire is filled in.
>
>
Questionnaire is filled in and submitted.
 


Revision 122018-02-09 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 8 to 8
 
1. Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Questionnaire is filled in.
 
2. Datacards should be checked and approved by the combination group
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
An svn repository (svn+ssh://svn.cern.ch/reps/cmshcg/trunk/cadi/HIG-17-028) is requested, and all datacards will be uploaded once the repository is created. Note that almost all datacards will be updated once the new hgg binning is obtained.
 
3. Fill in the HIG Muon questionnaire: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TWikiHIG-MUO
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Since this analysis concerns a combination, filling in the entire Muon questionnaire would be an exercise in copying information from the Hgg and Hzz entries. It is preferred to simply refer to the Muon questionnaire entries for the individual analyses: HIG-16-041 , HIG-17-025 .
 
4. For all the plots: add theory predictions

Revision 112018-02-09 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 45 to 45
  The uncertainties previously calculated concerned the combined uncertainty of statistical and systematic uncertainties. In order to calculate only the statistical uncertainties, the scans were repeated freezing all the nuisance parameters to their best-fit-value. The uncertainties split into stat and stat+syst are shown in the following plots, for the combined spectra.
Changed:
<
<
twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png
>
>
twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst_color.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst_color.png
 
Changed:
<
<
twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png
>
>
twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst_color.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst_color.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst_color.png
  The full set of scans from which the uncertainties were obtained is here: http://tklijnsm.web.cern.ch/tklijnsm/differentials2017/ptCombination_v3/preapp/statsyst_scans/ . In the majority of these scans, the systematic uncertainty is very small with respect to the statistical uncertainty.
Line: 109 to 109
  A separate scan was performed in which all the systematic nuisances were frozen to the best fit, yielding the only statistical uncertainties. This shape is shown in grey.
Changed:
<
<
totalXSscan.png
>
>
totalXSscanNew.png
 
8. Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
Line: 218 to 218
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" size="25543" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081014" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" size="28535" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081081" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" size="25493" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Deleted:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="totalXSscan.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518093944" name="totalXSscan.png" path="totalXSscan.png" size="31466" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518095751" name="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" path="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" size="30602" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="67014" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" size="72286" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="70657" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="69240" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" size="63166" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171096" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="32587" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171096" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" size="37208" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171096" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="35189" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171096" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="33318" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171096" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" size="29614" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="totalXSscanNew.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518170091" name="totalXSscanNew.png" path="totalXSscanNew.png" size="25815" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171502" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" size="32587" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst_color.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171502" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst_color.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst_color.png" size="37208" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171502" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" size="35189" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171502" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst_color.png" size="33318" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst_color.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518171502" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst_color.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst_color.png" size="29614" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 102018-02-08 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 29 to 29
  pT, for smH and ggH+xH (split):
Changed:
<
<
twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png
>
>
twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png
  nJets, pT_jet and rapidity:
Changed:
<
<
twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png
>
>
twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png
  The uncertainty denoted by the vertical line corresponds to the full uncertainty (statistical and systematic), whereas the filled area denotes only the statistical uncertainty (the total uncertainty is dominated by the statistical uncertainty; see Question 5).


5. For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots
Changed:
<
<
The uncertainties previously calculated concerned the combined uncertainty of statistical and systematic uncertainties. In order to calculate only the statistical uncertainties, the scans were repeated freezing all the nuisance parameters to their best-fit-value. An example for the difference between stat+syst en stat-only is shown here for the pT combination:
>
>
The uncertainties previously calculated concerned the combined uncertainty of statistical and systematic uncertainties. In order to calculate only the statistical uncertainties, the scans were repeated freezing all the nuisance parameters to their best-fit-value. The uncertainties split into stat and stat+syst are shown in the following plots, for the combined spectra.
 
Changed:
<
<
Stat. + syst.: parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png Stat. only: parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png
>
>
twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png
 
Changed:
<
<
The contribution of the statistical uncertainty to the total uncertainty dominates the systematic contribution. The statistical uncertainties are also plotted in the shapes shown in Question 4.
>
>
twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png
 
Changed:
<
<
A full set of scans is here: http://tklijnsm.web.cern.ch/tklijnsm/differentials2017/ptCombination_v3/preapp/statsyst_scans/ . In the majority of these scans, the systematic uncertainty is very small with respect to the statistical uncertainty.
>
>
The full set of scans from which the uncertainties were obtained is here: http://tklijnsm.web.cern.ch/tklijnsm/differentials2017/ptCombination_v3/preapp/statsyst_scans/ . In the majority of these scans, the systematic uncertainty is very small with respect to the statistical uncertainty.

The numerical values are also given in the tables in Question 6.

 
6. Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
Line: 196 to 198
 So far, no additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV has been included.

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="test.png" attr="" comment="" date="1517999811" name="test.png" path="test.png" size="42284" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="35059" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" size="39843" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" size="38014" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" size="35740" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="29696" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="35264" user="tklijnsm" version="3"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" size="39567" user="tklijnsm" version="3"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" size="37482" user="tklijnsm" version="3"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" size="36081" user="tklijnsm" version="3"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="29935" user="tklijnsm" version="3"
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" size="37643" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" size="37562" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" size="17393" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Line: 218 to 220
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081081" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" size="25493" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="totalXSscan.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518093944" name="totalXSscan.png" path="totalXSscan.png" size="31466" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518095751" name="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" path="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" size="30602" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="67014" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum_statsyst.png" size="72286" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="70657" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum_statsyst.png" size="69240" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518108178" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum_statsyst.png" size="63166" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 92018-02-08 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 196 to 196
 So far, no additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV has been included.

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="test.png" attr="" comment="" date="1517999811" name="test.png" path="test.png" size="42284" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="41145" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" size="42802" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" size="45136" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" size="50857" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="32030" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="35059" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" size="39843" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" size="38014" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" size="35740" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518104037" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="29696" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" size="37643" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" size="37562" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" size="17393" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 82018-02-08 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 25 to 25
  A line indicating the SM prediction is added to all the plots concerning combinations of differential cross sections. The 2D coupling scans already had SM predictions.
Changed:
<
<
The normalization of the SM line is set to the YR4 N3LO cross section for gluon fusion: 48.52 fb.
>
>
The normalization of the SM line is set to the YR4 N3LO cross section for gluon fusion: 48.52 fb.
  pT, for smH and ggH+xH (split):
Line: 59 to 59
  For all the observables, tables of their mu (ratio to SM) and cross section where computed. The resulting tables are displayed below, and will also be included in the paper draft.
Changed:
<
<
The format of the cells is:
>
>
The tables contain uncertainties in terms of ratio to SM (mu).
 
Changed:
<
<
center value +stat.-unc. +syst.-unc. UP
-stat.-unc. -syst.-unc. DOWN

Ratio to SM:

pth_smH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +1.11 +0.37 +0.13 +1.58 +0.32 +0.15 +0.86 +0.37 +0.11 +1.05 +0.31 +0.08 +0.59 +0.34 +0.09 +0.83 +0.32 +0.08 +2.00 +0.43 +0.16 +0.09 +0.75 +0.17
hgg -0.37 -0.03 -0.35 -0.12 -0.36 -0.06 -0.31 -0.05 -0.38 -0.07 -0.30 -0.04 -0.40 -0.11 -0.75 0
hzz +0.82 +0.38 +0.09 +1.45 +0.43 +0.12 +0.94 +0.27 +0.10 +1.24 +0.42 +0.06 -0.16 +0.29 +0.15
hzz -0.32 -0.06 -0.37 -0.09 -0.23 -0.07 -0.35 -0.07 -0.29 -0.15
combination +0.97 +0.27 +0.07 +1.53 +0.26 +0.10 +0.86 +0.33 +0.09 +1.03 +0.27 +0.07 +0.83 +0.30 0 +0.95 +0.30 +0.07 +1.76 +0.40 +0.05 -0.03 +0.71 +0.16
combination -0.25 -0.05 -0.27 -0.09 -0.33 -0.06 -0.26 -0.06 -0.29 -0.11 -0.29 -0.03 -0.38 -0.15 -0.51 -0.11

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

pth_smH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +0.92 +0.31 +0.11 +1.41 +0.28 +0.13 +0.51 +0.22 +0.07 +0.32 +0.09 +0.03 +0.07 +0.04 +0.01 +0.03 +0.01 +3.06E-03 +0.01 +2.67E-03 +9.70E-04 +0.01 +0.10 +0.02
hgg -0.31 -0.03 -0.32 -0.11 -0.22 -0.04 -0.09 -0.01 -0.05 -7.95E-03 -0.01 -1.42E-03 -2.49E-03 -7.08E-04 -0.10 0
hzz +0.68 +0.32 +0.07 +1.29 +0.38 +0.11 +0.36 +0.10 +0.04 +0.08 +0.03 +3.77E-03 -0.17 +0.31 +0.16
hzz -0.27 -0.05 -0.33 -0.08 -0.09 -0.03 -0.02 -4.86E-03 -0.31 -0.16
combination +0.81 +0.23 +0.06 +1.36 +0.23 +0.09 +0.51 +0.20 +0.05 +0.31 +0.08 +0.02 +0.10 +0.04 0 +0.04 +0.01 +2.70E-03 +0.01 +2.48E-03 +3.18E-04 -3.67E-03 +0.09 +0.02
combination -0.21 -0.04 -0.24 -0.08 -0.19 -0.04 -0.08 -0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 -1.32E-03 -2.36E-03 -9.21E-04 -0.07 -0.01

Ratio to SM:

pth_ggH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +1.11 +0.38 +0.12 +1.61 +0.33 +0.16 +0.84 +0.40 +0.12 +1.06 +0.37 +0.11 +0.42 +0.47 +0.12 +0.75 +0.49 +0.12 +2.66 +0.71 +0.27 -0.75 +1.31 +0.26
hgg -0.37 -0.06 -0.37 -0.13 -0.39 -0.06 -0.37 -0.06 -0.53 -0.08 -0.47 -0.06 -0.67 -0.18 -1.31 -0.26
hzz +0.84 +0.40 +0.23 +1.46 +0.44 +0.24 +0.94 +0.30 +0.12 +1.46 +0.65 +0.10 0 +0.68 +0.06
hzz -0.32 -0.10 -0.38 -0.17 -0.26 -0.21 -0.54 -0.23 -0.68 -0.06
combination +1.01 +0.28 +0.11 +1.56 +0.26 +0.14 +0.84 +0.36 +0.13 +1.03 +0.30 +0.16 +0.75 +0.37 +0.21 +0.94 +0.44 +0.22 +2.33 +0.68 +0.25 -1 +1.23 +0.35
combination -0.26 -0.08 -0.28 -0.12 -0.35 -0.13 -0.29 -0.16 -0.34 -0.23 -0.41 -0.21 -0.65 -0.12 -1.23 -0.35

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

pth_ggH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +0.91 +0.31 +0.10 +1.37 +0.28 +0.13 +0.46 +0.22 +0.06 +0.26 +0.09 +0.03 +0.03 +0.04 +9.93E-03 +0.02 +0.01 +2.87E-03 +9.11E-03 +2.44E-03 +9.37E-04 -0.05 +0.08 +0.02
hgg -0.30 -0.05 -0.32 -0.11 -0.21 -0.03 -0.09 -0.02 -0.04 -6.67E-03 -0.01 -1.36E-03 -2.30E-03 -6.34E-04 -0.08 -0.02
hzz +0.69 +0.32 +0.18 +1.24 +0.38 +0.20 +0.31 +0.10 +0.04 +0.06 +0.03 +4.38E-03 0 +0.39 +0.03
hzz -0.26 -0.09 -0.33 -0.15 -0.08 -0.07 -0.02 -9.87E-03 -0.39 -0.03
combination +0.82 +0.23 +0.09 +1.33 +0.22 +0.12 +0.45 +0.19 +0.07 +0.25 +0.07 +0.04 +0.06 +0.03 +0.02 +0.02 +0.01 +4.97E-03 +8.00E-03 +2.33E-03 +8.53E-04 -0.06 +0.08 +0.02
combination -0.22 -0.07 -0.24 -0.10 -0.19 -0.07 -0.07 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -9.41E-03 -4.80E-03 -2.22E-03 -3.99E-04 -0.08 -0.02

Ratio to SM:

ptjet 0-30 30-55 55-95 95-120 120-200 200-10000
hgg +1.46 +0.21 +0.12 +0.44 +0.52 +0.09 +1.29 +0.57 +0.19 +1.92 +1.34 +0.24 +5.93E-04 +0.69 +0.08 +3.12 +1.00 +0.18
hgg -0.21 -0.10 -0.54 -0.09 -0.60 -0.11 -1.33 -0.13 -0.65 -0.07 -1.00 -0.18
hzz +1.16 +0.23 +0.11 +1.29 +0.64 +0.13 +0.50 +0.58 +0.07 +0.71 +0.52 +0.09
hzz -0.21 -0.09 -0.54 -0.08 -0.58 -0.07 -0.37 0
combination +1.31 +0.16 +0.09 +0.85 +0.37 +0.08 +0.83 +0.49 +0.12 +1.66 +1.20 +0.11 -0.17 +0.67 +0.05 +2.96 +0.97 +0.19
combination -0.16 -0.08 -0.35 -0.05 -0.40 -0.05 -1.18 -0.15 -0.59 -0.10 -0.97 -0.19

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

ptjet 0-30 30-55 55-95 95-120 120-200 200-10000
hgg +0.05 +7.16E-03 +4.12E-03 +0.16 +0.20 +0.03 +0.20 +0.09 +0.03 +0.13 +0.09 +0.02 +1.50E-05 +0.02 +2.00E-03 +2.30 +0.74 +0.14
hgg -7.15E-03 -3.31E-03 -0.20 -0.03 -0.09 -0.02 -0.09 -8.95E-03 -0.02 -1.84E-03 -0.74 -0.14
hzz +0.04 +8.09E-03 +3.71E-03 +0.48 +0.24 +0.05 +0.08 +0.09 +0.01 +3.19 +2.34 +0.42
hzz -7.35E-03 -3.06E-03 -0.20 -0.03 -0.09 -0.01 -1.64 0
combination +0.05 +5.38E-03 +2.98E-03 +0.32 +0.14 +0.03 +0.13 +0.07 +0.02 +0.11 +0.08 +7.84E-03 -4.23E-03 +0.02 +1.38E-03 +2.19 +0.71 +0.14
combination -5.57E-03 -2.69E-03 -0.13 -0.02 -0.06 -8.13E-03 -0.08 -0.01 -0.01 -2.53E-03 -0.71 -0.14

Ratio to SM:

njets 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-10000
hgg +1.41 +1.41 0 +0.98 +0.35 +0.10 +0.12 +0.64 +0.15 +2.93 +1.88 +0.09 +2.09 +1.34 +0.34
hgg -0.21 -0.10 -0.34 -0.06 -0.65 -0.06 -1.88 -0.09 -1.46 -0.15
hzz +1.16 +0.23 +0.11 +0.62 +0.36 +0.08 +1.66 +0.89 +0.08 +0.69 +1.22 +0.17
hzz -0.21 -0.09 -0.28 -0.04 -0.71 -0.12 -1.22 -0.17
combination +1.31 +0.15 +0.09 +0.80 +0.26 +0.06 +0.84 +0.45 +0.11 +1.65 +1.51 +0.24 +1.82 +1.28 +0.26
combination -0.16 -0.08 -0.24 -0.04 -0.41 -0.06 -1.33 -0.13 -1.37 -0.11

Cross sections (pb):

njets 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-10000
hgg +50.36 +50.36 0 +13.68 +4.88 +1.43 +0.48 +2.67 +0.63 +3.22 +2.06 +0.10 +1.33 +0.85 +0.21
hgg -7.34 -3.70 -4.83 -0.78 -2.71 -0.26 -2.06 -0.10 -0.93 -0.09
hzz +41.34 +8.10 +4.11 +8.72 +5.03 +1.12 +6.90 +3.68 +0.33 +1.20 +2.11 +0.29
hzz -7.32 -3.38 -3.87 -0.59 -2.96 -0.48 -2.11 -0.29
combination +46.94 +5.49 +3.04 +11.19 +3.60 +0.86 +3.48 +1.86 +0.44 +1.81 +1.66 +0.26 +1.15 +0.81 +0.16
combination -5.75 -2.84 -3.40 -0.58 -1.70 -0.26 -1.46 -0.14 -0.87 -0.07

Ratio to SM:

rapidity 0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.6 0.6-0.9 0.9-1.2 1.2-2.5
hgg +1.50 +0.37 +0.14 +1.42 +0.40 +0.12 +1.14 +0.31 +0.13 +1.10 +0.34 +0.11 +1.00 +0.47 +0.13 +0.99 +0.38 +0.11
hgg -0.38 -0.12 -0.40 -0.07 -0.27 -0.06 -0.34 -0.06 -0.42 -0.07 -0.38 -0.05
hzz +1.41 +0.59 +0.11 +1.26 +0.62 +0.14 +1.26 +0.41 +0.10 +1.75 +0.50 +0.16 +0.54 +0.37 +0.06 +0.68 +0.35 +0.08
hzz -0.48 -0.07 -0.50 -0.07 -0.35 -0.08 -0.43 -0.07 -0.37 -0.06 -0.28 -0.06
combination +1.48 +0.31 +0.11 +1.37 +0.34 +0.09 +1.18 +0.24 +0.09 +1.36 +0.26 +0.09 +0.73 +0.30 +0.06 +0.81 +0.27 +0.06
combination -0.31 -0.08 -0.32 -0.06 -0.21 -0.06 -0.25 -0.07 -0.27 -0.05 -0.25 -0.04

Cross sections (pb/bin width):

rapidity 0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.6 0.6-0.9 0.9-1.2 1.2-2.5
hgg +41.85 +10.32 +4.02 +39.41 +11.17 +3.24 +30.92 +8.32 +3.52 +28.14 +8.79 +2.70 +23.66 +11.23 +3.06 +18.47 +7.18 +2.09
hgg -10.64 -3.26 -11.04 -1.91 -7.32 -1.70 -8.61 -1.52 -10.03 -1.72 -7.13 -1.00
hzz +39.09 +16.49 +3.15 +34.86 +17.13 +3.90 +34.24 +11.14 +2.84 +44.79 +12.76 +4.07 +12.72 +8.79 +1.46 +12.76 +6.50 +1.43
hzz -13.44 -1.93 -13.95 -1.86 -9.53 -2.05 -11.13 -1.76 -8.79 -1.46 -5.28 -1.06
combination +41.08 +8.74 +2.96 +37.99 +9.40 +2.46 +32.15 +6.63 +2.49 +34.90 +6.76 +2.30 +17.42 +7.20 +1.54 +15.24 +5.07 +1.08
combination -8.64 -2.32 -8.98 -1.73 -5.80 -1.53 -6.40 -1.74 -6.46 -1.08 -4.65 -0.72
>
>
pth_smH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg (stat.) 0.37 0.34 0.36 0.31 0.36 0.31 0.41 0.75
hgg (syst.) 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.13 0.08
hzz (stat.) 0.35 0.40 0.25 0.39 0.29
hzz (syst.) 0.07 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.15
combination (stat.) 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.26 0.29 0.30 0.39 0.61
combination (syst.) 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.13

pth_ggH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg (stat.) 0.37 0.35 0.40 0.37 0.50 0.48 0.69 1.31
hgg (syst.) 0.09 0.14 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.23 0.26
hzz (stat.) 0.36 0.41 0.28 0.59 0.68
hzz (syst.) 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.06
combination (stat.) 0.27 0.27 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.42 0.66 1.23
combination (syst.) 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.22 0.21 0.18 0.35

ptjet 0-30 30-55 55-95 95-120 120-200 200-10000
hgg (stat.) 0.21 0.53 0.58 1.34 0.67 1.00
hgg (syst.) 0.11 0.09 0.15 0.19 0.08 0.18
hzz (stat.) 0.22 0.59 0.58 0.44
hzz (syst.) 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.05
combination (stat.) 0.16 0.36 0.45 1.19 0.63 0.97
combination (syst.) 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.19

njets 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-10000
hgg (stat.) 0.20 0.35 0.65 1.88 1.40
hgg (syst.) 0.12 0.08 0.11 0.09 0.24
hzz (stat.) 0.22 0.32 0.80 1.22
hzz (syst.) 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.17
combination (stat.) 0.16 0.25 0.43 1.42 1.33
combination (syst.) 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.18 0.19

rapidity 0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.6 0.6-0.9 0.9-1.2 1.2-2.5
hgg (stat.) 0.38 0.40 0.29 0.34 0.45 0.38
hgg (syst.) 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.10 0.08
hzz (stat.) 0.54 0.56 0.38 0.47 0.37 0.31
hzz (syst.) 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.06 0.07
combination (stat.) 0.31 0.33 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.26
combination (syst.) 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.06 0.05
 


7. Total XS: separate also here syst stat
Changed:
<
<
[Still scanning]
>
>
A separate scan was performed in which all the systematic nuisances were frozen to the best fit, yielding the only statistical uncertainties. This shape is shown in grey.
 
Added:
>
>
totalXSscan.png
 
8. Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
Line: 183 to 121
 BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png
Added:
>
>
Scanning the ratio of BRs per pT bin would only have been possible if both hgg and hzz had identical binning schemes. Currently however, floating a BR-modifier per hgg-bin and hzz-bin yields too many degrees of freedom (8 modifiers for hgg + 8 modifiers for hzz > 8 reco bins hgg + 5 reco bins hzz).
 
9. For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan
Line: 221 to 161
 
12. kt vs kg: check the constraints that we get using only shape, floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
[TK] Star-like shape appears due to the limit-values of the parametrization coefficients when letting kappa_t/kappa_g go to infinity. Need to type more explanation here.
>
>
When the constraint from the normalization is dropped, the shape depends only on the ratio of kappa_t and kappa_g (this is a mathematical consequence of the parametrization). The plot below confirms this expectation: Different levels of exclusion are only obtained by varying the ratio.
 
Changed:
<
<
contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png
>
>
contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png
 


13. Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
In black is shown the 'nominal' result: Branching ratios fixed to their SM value, and the normalization fixed to the ggH cross section calculated in Yellow Report 4. The result obtained by making the branching ratios depend on the couplings is shown in blue; the result is more constrained due to the constraining effect of the total width.
>
>
In black is shown the 'nominal' result: Branching ratios fixed to their SM value, and the normalization fixed to the ggH cross section calculated in Yellow Report 4. The result obtained by making the branching ratios depend on the couplings is shown in blue; the result is more constrained due to the gamma-gamma loop effects (the gamma-gamma width goes to zero around kappa_t ~ 2.0).
  In red a further modification is applied, where also the overall normalization is floated in the fit. As expected, this is less constraining than keeping it fixed. The discrimination due to the shape is mostly on kappa_t, whereas on kappa_g hardly a clear constraint can be made.
Line: 277 to 216
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" size="25543" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081014" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" size="28535" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081081" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" size="25493" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Changed:
<
<
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081859" name="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" path="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" size="35878" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="totalXSscan.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518093944" name="totalXSscan.png" path="totalXSscan.png" size="31466" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518095751" name="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" path="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS_Top.png" size="30602" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 72018-02-08 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 57 to 57
 
6. Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
Added:
>
>
For all the observables, tables of their mu (ratio to SM) and cross section where computed. The resulting tables are displayed below, and will also be included in the paper draft.

The format of the cells is:

center value +stat.-unc. +syst.-unc. UP
-stat.-unc. -syst.-unc. DOWN
  Ratio to SM:
Line: 207 to 213
  In black is shown the 'nominal' result: Branching ratios fixed to their SM value, and the normalization fixed to the ggH cross section calculated in Yellow Report 4. The result obtained by making the branching ratios depend on the couplings is shown in blue; the result is more constrained due to the constraining effect of the total width. In red a further modification is applied, where also the overall normalization is floated in the fit. As expected, this is less constraining than keeping it fixed.
Added:
>
>
The results shown here were computed using the Asimov (expected) dataset.
 contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png


12. kt vs kg: check the constraints that we get using only shape, floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
[Still re-scanning]
>
>
[TK] Star-like shape appears due to the limit-values of the parametrization coefficients when letting kappa_t/kappa_g go to infinity. Need to type more explanation here.

contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png

 


Line: 223 to 234
  In red a further modification is applied, where also the overall normalization is floated in the fit. As expected, this is less constraining than keeping it fixed. The discrimination due to the shape is mostly on kappa_t, whereas on kappa_g hardly a clear constraint can be made.
Added:
>
>
The results shown here were computed using the Asimov (expected) dataset.
 contours_BRcouplingDependency.png
Line: 239 to 252
  contours_Top_newBins.png
Changed:
<
<
The result is comparable to that of hgg alone. As soon as the new hgg datacards are in, I will restart all the relevant scans.
>
>
The result is comparable to that of hgg alone. As soon as the new hgg datacards are in, I will restart all the relevant scans. The results shown here were computed using the Asimov (expected) dataset.
  So far, no additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV has been included.
Line: 264 to 277
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" size="25543" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081014" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" size="28535" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081081" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" size="25493" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081859" name="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" path="contours_profiledTotalXS_profiledTotalXS.png" size="35878" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 62018-02-08 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 205 to 205
 
11. For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
[Still re-scanning]
>
>
In black is shown the 'nominal' result: Branching ratios fixed to their SM value, and the normalization fixed to the ggH cross section calculated in Yellow Report 4. The result obtained by making the branching ratios depend on the couplings is shown in blue; the result is more constrained due to the constraining effect of the total width. In red a further modification is applied, where also the overall normalization is floated in the fit. As expected, this is less constraining than keeping it fixed.

contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png

 


Line: 217 to 219
 
13. Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
[Still re-scanning]
>
>
In black is shown the 'nominal' result: Branching ratios fixed to their SM value, and the normalization fixed to the ggH cross section calculated in Yellow Report 4. The result obtained by making the branching ratios depend on the couplings is shown in blue; the result is more constrained due to the constraining effect of the total width.

In red a further modification is applied, where also the overall normalization is floated in the fit. As expected, this is less constraining than keeping it fixed. The discrimination due to the shape is mostly on kappa_t, whereas on kappa_g hardly a clear constraint can be made.

contours_BRcouplingDependency.png

 


Line: 256 to 262
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" size="25683" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" size="25582" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" size="25543" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081014" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency.png" size="28535" user="tklijnsm" version="2"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518081081" name="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" path="contours_BRcouplingDependency_Yukawa.png" size="25493" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 52018-02-07 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06

Pre-approval comments v1

Deleted:
<
<
One One One Two One Three
Two Two Two Three
Three One Three Three
 
1. Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
Line: 62 to 57
 
6. Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
Changed:
<
<
Redo
>
>
Ratio to SM:

pth_smH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +1.11 +0.37 +0.13 +1.58 +0.32 +0.15 +0.86 +0.37 +0.11 +1.05 +0.31 +0.08 +0.59 +0.34 +0.09 +0.83 +0.32 +0.08 +2.00 +0.43 +0.16 +0.09 +0.75 +0.17
hgg -0.37 -0.03 -0.35 -0.12 -0.36 -0.06 -0.31 -0.05 -0.38 -0.07 -0.30 -0.04 -0.40 -0.11 -0.75 0
hzz +0.82 +0.38 +0.09 +1.45 +0.43 +0.12 +0.94 +0.27 +0.10 +1.24 +0.42 +0.06 -0.16 +0.29 +0.15
hzz -0.32 -0.06 -0.37 -0.09 -0.23 -0.07 -0.35 -0.07 -0.29 -0.15
combination +0.97 +0.27 +0.07 +1.53 +0.26 +0.10 +0.86 +0.33 +0.09 +1.03 +0.27 +0.07 +0.83 +0.30 0 +0.95 +0.30 +0.07 +1.76 +0.40 +0.05 -0.03 +0.71 +0.16
combination -0.25 -0.05 -0.27 -0.09 -0.33 -0.06 -0.26 -0.06 -0.29 -0.11 -0.29 -0.03 -0.38 -0.15 -0.51 -0.11

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

pth_smH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +0.92 +0.31 +0.11 +1.41 +0.28 +0.13 +0.51 +0.22 +0.07 +0.32 +0.09 +0.03 +0.07 +0.04 +0.01 +0.03 +0.01 +3.06E-03 +0.01 +2.67E-03 +9.70E-04 +0.01 +0.10 +0.02
hgg -0.31 -0.03 -0.32 -0.11 -0.22 -0.04 -0.09 -0.01 -0.05 -7.95E-03 -0.01 -1.42E-03 -2.49E-03 -7.08E-04 -0.10 0
hzz +0.68 +0.32 +0.07 +1.29 +0.38 +0.11 +0.36 +0.10 +0.04 +0.08 +0.03 +3.77E-03 -0.17 +0.31 +0.16
hzz -0.27 -0.05 -0.33 -0.08 -0.09 -0.03 -0.02 -4.86E-03 -0.31 -0.16
combination +0.81 +0.23 +0.06 +1.36 +0.23 +0.09 +0.51 +0.20 +0.05 +0.31 +0.08 +0.02 +0.10 +0.04 0 +0.04 +0.01 +2.70E-03 +0.01 +2.48E-03 +3.18E-04 -3.67E-03 +0.09 +0.02
combination -0.21 -0.04 -0.24 -0.08 -0.19 -0.04 -0.08 -0.02 -0.03 -0.01 -0.01 -1.32E-03 -2.36E-03 -9.21E-04 -0.07 -0.01

Ratio to SM:

pth_ggH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +1.11 +0.38 +0.12 +1.61 +0.33 +0.16 +0.84 +0.40 +0.12 +1.06 +0.37 +0.11 +0.42 +0.47 +0.12 +0.75 +0.49 +0.12 +2.66 +0.71 +0.27 -0.75 +1.31 +0.26
hgg -0.37 -0.06 -0.37 -0.13 -0.39 -0.06 -0.37 -0.06 -0.53 -0.08 -0.47 -0.06 -0.67 -0.18 -1.31 -0.26
hzz +0.84 +0.40 +0.23 +1.46 +0.44 +0.24 +0.94 +0.30 +0.12 +1.46 +0.65 +0.10 0 +0.68 +0.06
hzz -0.32 -0.10 -0.38 -0.17 -0.26 -0.21 -0.54 -0.23 -0.68 -0.06
combination +1.01 +0.28 +0.11 +1.56 +0.26 +0.14 +0.84 +0.36 +0.13 +1.03 +0.30 +0.16 +0.75 +0.37 +0.21 +0.94 +0.44 +0.22 +2.33 +0.68 +0.25 -1 +1.23 +0.35
combination -0.26 -0.08 -0.28 -0.12 -0.35 -0.13 -0.29 -0.16 -0.34 -0.23 -0.41 -0.21 -0.65 -0.12 -1.23 -0.35

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

pth_ggH 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-85 85-125 125-200 200-350 350-10000
hgg +0.91 +0.31 +0.10 +1.37 +0.28 +0.13 +0.46 +0.22 +0.06 +0.26 +0.09 +0.03 +0.03 +0.04 +9.93E-03 +0.02 +0.01 +2.87E-03 +9.11E-03 +2.44E-03 +9.37E-04 -0.05 +0.08 +0.02
hgg -0.30 -0.05 -0.32 -0.11 -0.21 -0.03 -0.09 -0.02 -0.04 -6.67E-03 -0.01 -1.36E-03 -2.30E-03 -6.34E-04 -0.08 -0.02
hzz +0.69 +0.32 +0.18 +1.24 +0.38 +0.20 +0.31 +0.10 +0.04 +0.06 +0.03 +4.38E-03 0 +0.39 +0.03
hzz -0.26 -0.09 -0.33 -0.15 -0.08 -0.07 -0.02 -9.87E-03 -0.39 -0.03
combination +0.82 +0.23 +0.09 +1.33 +0.22 +0.12 +0.45 +0.19 +0.07 +0.25 +0.07 +0.04 +0.06 +0.03 +0.02 +0.02 +0.01 +4.97E-03 +8.00E-03 +2.33E-03 +8.53E-04 -0.06 +0.08 +0.02
combination -0.22 -0.07 -0.24 -0.10 -0.19 -0.07 -0.07 -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -9.41E-03 -4.80E-03 -2.22E-03 -3.99E-04 -0.08 -0.02

Ratio to SM:

ptjet 0-30 30-55 55-95 95-120 120-200 200-10000
hgg +1.46 +0.21 +0.12 +0.44 +0.52 +0.09 +1.29 +0.57 +0.19 +1.92 +1.34 +0.24 +5.93E-04 +0.69 +0.08 +3.12 +1.00 +0.18
hgg -0.21 -0.10 -0.54 -0.09 -0.60 -0.11 -1.33 -0.13 -0.65 -0.07 -1.00 -0.18
hzz +1.16 +0.23 +0.11 +1.29 +0.64 +0.13 +0.50 +0.58 +0.07 +0.71 +0.52 +0.09
hzz -0.21 -0.09 -0.54 -0.08 -0.58 -0.07 -0.37 0
combination +1.31 +0.16 +0.09 +0.85 +0.37 +0.08 +0.83 +0.49 +0.12 +1.66 +1.20 +0.11 -0.17 +0.67 +0.05 +2.96 +0.97 +0.19
combination -0.16 -0.08 -0.35 -0.05 -0.40 -0.05 -1.18 -0.15 -0.59 -0.10 -0.97 -0.19

Cross sections (pb/GeV):

ptjet 0-30 30-55 55-95 95-120 120-200 200-10000
hgg +0.05 +7.16E-03 +4.12E-03 +0.16 +0.20 +0.03 +0.20 +0.09 +0.03 +0.13 +0.09 +0.02 +1.50E-05 +0.02 +2.00E-03 +2.30 +0.74 +0.14
hgg -7.15E-03 -3.31E-03 -0.20 -0.03 -0.09 -0.02 -0.09 -8.95E-03 -0.02 -1.84E-03 -0.74 -0.14
hzz +0.04 +8.09E-03 +3.71E-03 +0.48 +0.24 +0.05 +0.08 +0.09 +0.01 +3.19 +2.34 +0.42
hzz -7.35E-03 -3.06E-03 -0.20 -0.03 -0.09 -0.01 -1.64 0
combination +0.05 +5.38E-03 +2.98E-03 +0.32 +0.14 +0.03 +0.13 +0.07 +0.02 +0.11 +0.08 +7.84E-03 -4.23E-03 +0.02 +1.38E-03 +2.19 +0.71 +0.14
combination -5.57E-03 -2.69E-03 -0.13 -0.02 -0.06 -8.13E-03 -0.08 -0.01 -0.01 -2.53E-03 -0.71 -0.14

Ratio to SM:

njets 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-10000
hgg +1.41 +1.41 0 +0.98 +0.35 +0.10 +0.12 +0.64 +0.15 +2.93 +1.88 +0.09 +2.09 +1.34 +0.34
hgg -0.21 -0.10 -0.34 -0.06 -0.65 -0.06 -1.88 -0.09 -1.46 -0.15
hzz +1.16 +0.23 +0.11 +0.62 +0.36 +0.08 +1.66 +0.89 +0.08 +0.69 +1.22 +0.17
hzz -0.21 -0.09 -0.28 -0.04 -0.71 -0.12 -1.22 -0.17
combination +1.31 +0.15 +0.09 +0.80 +0.26 +0.06 +0.84 +0.45 +0.11 +1.65 +1.51 +0.24 +1.82 +1.28 +0.26
combination -0.16 -0.08 -0.24 -0.04 -0.41 -0.06 -1.33 -0.13 -1.37 -0.11

Cross sections (pb):

njets 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-10000
hgg +50.36 +50.36 0 +13.68 +4.88 +1.43 +0.48 +2.67 +0.63 +3.22 +2.06 +0.10 +1.33 +0.85 +0.21
hgg -7.34 -3.70 -4.83 -0.78 -2.71 -0.26 -2.06 -0.10 -0.93 -0.09
hzz +41.34 +8.10 +4.11 +8.72 +5.03 +1.12 +6.90 +3.68 +0.33 +1.20 +2.11 +0.29
hzz -7.32 -3.38 -3.87 -0.59 -2.96 -0.48 -2.11 -0.29
combination +46.94 +5.49 +3.04 +11.19 +3.60 +0.86 +3.48 +1.86 +0.44 +1.81 +1.66 +0.26 +1.15 +0.81 +0.16
combination -5.75 -2.84 -3.40 -0.58 -1.70 -0.26 -1.46 -0.14 -0.87 -0.07

Ratio to SM:

rapidity 0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.6 0.6-0.9 0.9-1.2 1.2-2.5
hgg +1.50 +0.37 +0.14 +1.42 +0.40 +0.12 +1.14 +0.31 +0.13 +1.10 +0.34 +0.11 +1.00 +0.47 +0.13 +0.99 +0.38 +0.11
hgg -0.38 -0.12 -0.40 -0.07 -0.27 -0.06 -0.34 -0.06 -0.42 -0.07 -0.38 -0.05
hzz +1.41 +0.59 +0.11 +1.26 +0.62 +0.14 +1.26 +0.41 +0.10 +1.75 +0.50 +0.16 +0.54 +0.37 +0.06 +0.68 +0.35 +0.08
hzz -0.48 -0.07 -0.50 -0.07 -0.35 -0.08 -0.43 -0.07 -0.37 -0.06 -0.28 -0.06
combination +1.48 +0.31 +0.11 +1.37 +0.34 +0.09 +1.18 +0.24 +0.09 +1.36 +0.26 +0.09 +0.73 +0.30 +0.06 +0.81 +0.27 +0.06
combination -0.31 -0.08 -0.32 -0.06 -0.21 -0.06 -0.25 -0.07 -0.27 -0.05 -0.25 -0.04

Cross sections (pb/bin width):

rapidity 0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.6 0.6-0.9 0.9-1.2 1.2-2.5
hgg +41.85 +10.32 +4.02 +39.41 +11.17 +3.24 +30.92 +8.32 +3.52 +28.14 +8.79 +2.70 +23.66 +11.23 +3.06 +18.47 +7.18 +2.09
hgg -10.64 -3.26 -11.04 -1.91 -7.32 -1.70 -8.61 -1.52 -10.03 -1.72 -7.13 -1.00
hzz +39.09 +16.49 +3.15 +34.86 +17.13 +3.90 +34.24 +11.14 +2.84 +44.79 +12.76 +4.07 +12.72 +8.79 +1.46 +12.76 +6.50 +1.43
hzz -13.44 -1.93 -13.95 -1.86 -9.53 -2.05 -11.13 -1.76 -8.79 -1.46 -5.28 -1.06
combination +41.08 +8.74 +2.96 +37.99 +9.40 +2.46 +32.15 +6.63 +2.49 +34.90 +6.76 +2.30 +17.42 +7.20 +1.54 +15.24 +5.07 +1.08
combination -8.64 -2.32 -8.98 -1.73 -5.80 -1.53 -6.40 -1.74 -6.46 -1.08 -4.65 -0.72
 
7. Total XS: separate also here syst stat
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
[Still scanning]
 
8. Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
Changed:
<
<
Fitted it for totalXS, and all the observables Agree within uncertainties
>
>
I performed this cross check for all the observables we are doing. The results agree within uncertainties, and are shown below.

BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_0.png BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_1.png BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png

BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png

 
9. For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan
Line: 94 to 197
 
10. Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
I added a point at (0,0). The contribution that is left is due to the kappa_top term, that is fixed to SM.
 
Added:
>
>
comparison_Yukawa_pointsOnContourOnePlot.png
 
Deleted:
<
<
<<<< TODAY:
 
11. For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
Redo with proper ws
>
>
[Still re-scanning]
 
12. kt vs kg: check the constraints that we get using only shape, floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
For both kb vs. kc and kt vs. kg, a scan is performed floating the overall normalisation.
>
>
[Still re-scanning]
 


13. Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
[Still re-scanning]
 
Deleted:
<
<
>>>>
 
14. Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination
Changed:
<
<
Probably "cg"
>
>
I would suggest to use "c_g" here, which is what the authors behind the kappa_t/c_g originally called it. Once agreed upon I will change all plotting labels.
 
15. Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV
Changed:
<
<
Need Vs ws.
>
>
As the hgg cards are not yet migrated to the new binning scheme, I performed a combination of hzz and hbb:

contours_Top_newBins.png

The result is comparable to that of hgg alone. As soon as the new hgg datacards are in, I will restart all the relevant scans.

So far, no additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV has been included.

 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="test.png" attr="" comment="" date="1517999811" name="test.png" path="test.png" size="42284" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="41145" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Line: 140 to 249
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" size="20303" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" size="18191" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" size="21154" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="comparison_Yukawa_pointsOnContourOnePlot.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518039147" name="comparison_Yukawa_pointsOnContourOnePlot.png" path="comparison_Yukawa_pointsOnContourOnePlot.png" size="30547" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="contours_Top_newBins.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518039682" name="contours_Top_newBins.png" path="contours_Top_newBins.png" size="28285" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_0.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_0.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_0.png" size="24114" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_1.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_1.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_1.png" size="25801" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_2.png" size="25683" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20_3.png" size="25582" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518041148" name="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" path="BRscan_Scan_ratioOfBRs_Dec20.png" size="25543" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 42018-02-07 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06

Pre-approval comments v1

Deleted:
<
<
Test image:
 
Changed:
<
<
test.png
>
>
One One One Two One Three
Two Two Two Three
Three One Three Three
 
1. Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire

Revision 32018-02-07 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06
Line: 9 to 9
 test.png


Changed:
<
<
Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
>
>
1. Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
  TODO


Changed:
<
<
Datacards should be checked and approved by the combination group
>
>
2. Datacards should be checked and approved by the combination group
  TODO


Changed:
<
<
Fill in the HIG Muon questionnaire: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TWikiHIG-MUO
>
>
3. Fill in the HIG Muon questionnaire: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TWikiHIG-MUO
  TODO


Changed:
<
<
For all the plots: add theory predictions
>
>
4. For all the plots: add theory predictions
  A line indicating the SM prediction is added to all the plots concerning combinations of differential cross sections. The 2D coupling scans already had SM predictions.
Line: 41 to 41
 twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png
Added:
>
>
The uncertainty denoted by the vertical line corresponds to the full uncertainty (statistical and systematic), whereas the filled area denotes only the statistical uncertainty (the total uncertainty is dominated by the statistical uncertainty; see Question 5).
 
Changed:
<
<
For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots
>
>
5. For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots

The uncertainties previously calculated concerned the combined uncertainty of statistical and systematic uncertainties. In order to calculate only the statistical uncertainties, the scans were repeated freezing all the nuisance parameters to their best-fit-value. An example for the difference between stat+syst en stat-only is shown here for the pT combination:

Stat. + syst.: parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png Stat. only: parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png

 
Changed:
<
<
The following set of plots has their error bar split between stat+syst (the vertical line) and stat-only (the filled block).
>
>
The contribution of the statistical uncertainty to the total uncertainty dominates the systematic contribution. The statistical uncertainties are also plotted in the shapes shown in Question 4.

A full set of scans is here: http://tklijnsm.web.cern.ch/tklijnsm/differentials2017/ptCombination_v3/preapp/statsyst_scans/ . In the majority of these scans, the systematic uncertainty is very small with respect to the statistical uncertainty.

 
Changed:
<
<
Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
>
>
6. Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
  Redo


Changed:
<
<
Total XS: separate also here syst stat
>
>
7. Total XS: separate also here syst stat
  TODO


Changed:
<
<
Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
>
>
8. Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
  Fitted it for totalXS, and all the observables Agree within uncertainties


Changed:
<
<
For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan
>
>
9. For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan

A 2-sigma line is included in the plot; note that 2-sigma (95.45%) differs slightly from the asked 95% CL. Also the numerical result is printed in a more clear way.

 
Changed:
<
<
Code done but redo for reweighted
>
>
Observed:

oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png

Expected:

oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png

 


Changed:
<
<
Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)
>
>
10. Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)
  TODO
Line: 78 to 99
 TODAY:


Changed:
<
<
For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation
>
>
11. For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation
  Redo with proper ws


Changed:
<
<
kt vs kg: check the constraints tha we get using only shape floating also the overall normalisation
>
>
12. kt vs kg: check the constraints that we get using only shape, floating also the overall normalisation

For both kb vs. kc and kt vs. kg, a scan is performed floating the overall normalisation.

 
Deleted:
<
<
Redo with proper ws
 
Changed:
<
<
Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation
>
>
13. Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation
  TODO

>>>>


Changed:
<
<
Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination
>
>
14. Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination
  Probably "cg"


Changed:
<
<
Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV
>
>
15. Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV
  Need Vs ws.
Line: 112 to 134
 
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="32030" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" size="37643" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" size="37562" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab_asimov.png" size="17393" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappab_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappab.png" size="20303" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac_asimov.png" size="18191" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518018729" name="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" path="oneKappaScan_kappac_Scan_Yukawa_Feb07_combined_oneKappa_kappac.png" size="21154" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 22018-02-07 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06

Pre-approval comments v1

Added:
>
>
Test image:

test.png

 
Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire
Line: 22 to 26
 
For all the plots: add theory predictions
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
A line indicating the SM prediction is added to all the plots concerning combinations of differential cross sections. The 2D coupling scans already had SM predictions.

The normalization of the SM line is set to the YR4 N3LO cross section for gluon fusion: 48.52 fb.

pT, for smH and ggH+xH (split):

twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png

nJets, pT_jet and rapidity:

twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png

 
For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
The following set of plots has their error bar split between stat+syst (the vertical line) and stat-only (the filled block).
 
Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Redo
 
Total XS: separate also here syst stat
Line: 42 to 59
 
Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Fitted it for totalXS, and all the observables Agree within uncertainties
 
For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Code done but redo for reweighted
 
Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)

TODO

Added:
>
>
<<<< TODAY:
 
For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Redo with proper ws
 
kt vs kg: check the constraints tha we get using only shape floating also the overall normalisation
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Redo with proper ws
 
Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation

TODO

Added:
>
>
>>>>
 
Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Probably "cg"
 
Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV
Changed:
<
<
TODO
>
>
Need Vs ws.

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="test.png" attr="" comment="" date="1517999811" name="test.png" path="test.png" size="42284" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_nJetsSpectrum.png" size="41145" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pth_ggH_Spectrum.png" size="42802" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_pthSpectrum.png" size="45136" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_ptjetSpectrum.png" size="50857" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000105" name="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" path="twoPanel_rapiditySpectrum.png" size="32030" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination_statonly.png" size="37643" user="tklijnsm" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" attr="" comment="" date="1518000901" name="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" path="parabolas_smH_PTH_combination.png" size="37562" user="tklijnsm" version="1"

Revision 12018-02-06 - ThomasKlijnsma

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="ThomasKlijnsma"
-- ThomasKlijnsma - 2018-02-06

Pre-approval comments v1


Fill in the StatComm questionnaire: http://cern.ch/cms-stat-questionnaire

TODO


Datacards should be checked and approved by the combination group

TODO


Fill in the HIG Muon questionnaire: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/TWikiHIG-MUO

TODO


For all the plots: add theory predictions

TODO


For all the plots: add systematic error uncertainty in the plots

TODO


Include tables with numerical values of cross-sections & uncertainties in the paper draft, including separation of systematics and statistics. Correlation matrix to be released as well (

TODO


Total XS: separate also here syst stat

TODO


Cross checks for the BR: BR vs pt, BR using the Njets categorisation

TODO


For kb vs kc, kt vs kg, kb vs kt: add also the 95% CL from the 1D scan

TODO


Add additional deformation of the kc,kb spectrum going in other directions (closer to 0,0)

TODO


For supplementary material: when modifying the BR for kb,kc add a third fit floating also the overall normalisation

TODO


kt vs kg: check the constraints tha we get using only shape floating also the overall normalisation

TODO


Possible for supplementary material: include also the variation of the BR also for kt,kg and check also here the constraints only from shape floating the overall normalisation

TODO


Find a new name for kg which has a different parametrisation wrt couplings combination

TODO


Most notably: boosted ggH(bb) needs to be added in the pt spectrum and in the kt,kg interpretation. Preliminary list of discussed checks: compare the theory predictions currently used for boosted ggHbb vs HRES, ggHbb team should provide the datacards as soon as possible, consider to add an additional theory uncertainty for the mtop treatment above 350 GeV

TODO

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback