Difference: RemainingXSTasks (15 vs. 16)

Revision 162013-04-10 - BenCarlson

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="BenCarlson"

  • To do for Approval Meeting( goal: before April 12)

  1. refit acceptance using weighted $p_{T}$ spectrum instead of flat result in each $p_{T}$ bin; evaluate yield change. Add revised acceptance in fig. 18 or replace flat version?
Changed:
<
<
  1. Come up with revised fitting technique. Use histogram with fit option "I"? This will exclued asymmetric errors.
>
>
  1. Come up with revised fitting technique. Use histogram with fit option "I"? This will exclued asymmetric errors.
    Already being performed using a more general technique from TGraphAsymmErrors
 
  1. Fit CB or CB convolved with Gaussian to lineshape in sample $p_{T}$ bins.
  2. Plot lineshape, (CB fit?) and MC mass distribution for each pt bin.
Changed:
<
<
  1. Do the $\mid\eta(\mu)\mid$ restriction to illustrate how the $\zeta$ distribution changes in various $p_{T}$ bins
>
>
  1. Do the $\mid\eta(\mu)\mid$ restriction to illustrate how the $\zeta$ distribution changes in various $p_{T}$ bins (Done)
 
  1. Give $\chi^{2}$ values for the mass fits in each $p_{T}$ bin. Do we want to quote the full region or a subset localized around the signals?
  2. do unbinned extended ML fits for highest pt bins and document changes in yields
  3. get an estimate of the rho parameter from the single muon triggers.
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback