Approved2009CosmicPlotsJetEtMiss < AtlasPublic

%ATLASPUBLICHEADER%

---+!! <nop>%TOPIC%

%TOC% <!--optional--> 
%STARTINCLUDE%

---+ Introduction

<!-- Add an introduction here, describing the purpose of this topic. --> Large energy depositions arising from muons produced by cosmic rays are a significant potential source of fake missing transverse energy. We study the characteristics of fake jets in cosmic-ray muon data recorded with the ATLAS calorimeter in 2008 and 2009 and compare this to a Monte Carlo simulation. A Log-likelihood ratio tool based on jet variables is developed to distinguish the "fake" jets from real QCD jets. The robustness of these variables against the superposition of soft proton-proton collision events is also studied.

---+ Main heading

<!--Add the main topic here. i.e. create some new headings as follows: -->

---++ Data Sets

Cosmic-ray data triggered by the <NOP>L1Calo stream were used for these studies. Here we analyzed runs 90272, 91900, 92112 and 92160 taken in September/October 2008, and 137156, 137651, 137801 and 137831 taken in October/November 2009. Cosmic-ray Monte Carlo samples were produced using the known cosmic muon flux at the ground level. The 2008 cosmic-ray runs 91900, 92112 and 92160 were overlaid with minimum bias MC using Athena 15.3.1.5.

---++ MET/SumEt/Jets in Cosmic Data and Cosmic MC

*Contacts for these plots:* [[Main.TancrediCarli][Tancredi Carli]], [[Main.RichardTeuscher][Richard Teuscher]]

<table bgcolor="#f5f5fa" style="width: 100%;" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="10" border="1"> <tbody> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[MET]

Distribution of the missing transverse energy (MET) reconstructed from all calorimeter cells with |E|&gt;2sigma(noise) at EM scale. The distributions of cosmic-ray simulation and the 2008 cosmic-ray data are normalized to the 2009 data in the range 100&lt; Missing Et &lt;300 <NOP>GeV. Only events which have reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The Monte Carlo simulation does not include air showers and also contains an imperfect modeling of electronic noise. 
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/MET-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/MET-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[SumEt]

Distribution of the scalar sum of the transverse energy reconstructed from all calorimeter cells with |E|&gt;2sigma(noise) at EM scale. The same normalization factor as in the figure above is applied. Only events which have reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The Monte Carlo simulation does not include air showers and also contains an imperfect modeling of electronic noise.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/SumEt-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/SumEt-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Jet Pt]

Distribution of reconstructed jet Pt from the 2008/2009 cosmic-ray data and cosmic-ray simulation. The same normalization factor as in the figure above is applied.The ATLAS Anti-Kt4 Jet algorithm is used. Only jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The Monte Carlo simulation does not include air showers and also contains an imperfect modeling of electronic noise.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/JetPt-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/JetPt-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Energy ratio of leading cells in jet]

Distribution of energy ratio of leading cells in the jet. The Ratio_LC is defined as the sum of the energy of the 2 most energetic cells in the hadronic calorimeter and 32 energetic cells in the EM calorimeter divided by the total reconstructed jet energy. Only jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The same normalization factor as in the figure above is applied. The Monte Carlo simulation does not include air showers and also contains an imperfect modeling of electronic noise.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Ratio-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Ratio-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Jet Rcone]

Distribution of the radius of the reconstructed jet cone. Only jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The same normalization factor as for the figure above is applied. The Monte Carlo simulation does not include air showers and also contains an imperfect modeling of electronic noise.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rcone-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rcone-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Jet EM fraction]

The jet electromagnetic energy fraction, defined as the ratio of the energy of the jet recorded in the EM calorimeter divided by the total energy of the jet. Only jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV are included. The same normalization factor used for the above figure is applied.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/fEM-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/fEM-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

---++ MET/SumEt/Jets in Cosmic Data, Mixed Events (cosmics + minibias MC) and Dijets MC (J2 to J5)
<table bgcolor="#f5f5fa" style="width: 100%;" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="10" border="1"> <tbody> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[MET]

Distribution of missing transverse energy in cosmic-ray data, data mixed with simulation events, and dijet simulation. Only events which have jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are included. No clear difference is seen in the distribution of MET before and after mixing of cosmic-ray data with simulation events.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/MET-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/MET-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[SumEt]

Distribution of SumEt from cosmic-ray data, mixed events, and dijet simulation. Only events which have a reconstructed jet with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are included. A significant difference between cosmic-ray data and mixed events is observed.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/SumEt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/SumEt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Jet Pt]

Distribution of reconstructed jet Pt from cosmic-ray data, mixed events and dijet simulation. Only jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are shown.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/JetPtraw-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/JetPtraw-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Energy ratio of leading cells in jet, jet Rcone and EM fraction]

Distribution of Ratio_LC, jet Rcone and jet EM fraction from the cosmic-ray data, mixed events and dijets simulation. Only reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are shown. A slight difference in the distribution of Ratio_LC and jet Rcone between cosmic-ray data and mixed events is observed. The distribution of jet EM fraction in mixed events is wider than cosmic-ray data for the region of low EM fraction. A significant separation between cosmic-ray "fake" jets and real jets from dijet simulation is observed. The three jet variables are used to build Probability Distribution Functions and a Log Likelihood Ratio for rejecting cosmic-ray background.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rcone-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][Rcone.eps]]</b>
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Ratio-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][Ratio.eps]]</b>
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/fEM-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps][EMfraceps]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Ratio-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /> <img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rcone-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /> <img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/fEM-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

---++ Log-Likelihood Ratio
<table bgcolor="#f5f5fa" style="width: 100%;" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="10" border="1"> <tbody> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Log-Likelihood Ratio]

Distribution of the Log-Likelihood Ratio (LLR) obtained with Ratio_LC, jet Rcone and jet EM fraction from the mixed cosmic-ray data and dijets simulation. The ATLAS Anti-kt4 jet algorithm is used. Only reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are included.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/LLRfinal-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LLRfinal-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Cosmic-ray background rejection vs Jet efficiency]

Dijet efficiency versus cosmic-ray background rejection. The ATLAS Anti-kt4 Jet algorithm is used. Only reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are included. Cosmic-ray background rejection is obtained from the mixed events, while the jet efficiency is obtained from the dijet simulation. The red circles correspond to different cut values of the LLR obtained with all the three jet variables, Ratio_LC, Rcone and EM fraction. The blue squares are from cutting on the jet EM fraction only. The black stars are from a 2-dimensional PDF of Ratio_LC vs Rcone. For the LLR obtained with all the three variables, one can see the improvement on cosmic-ray background rejection over the other two single LLRs.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rej-eff-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.eps][eps file]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Rej-eff-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

[Application]

Summary of all cuts on rejecting cosmic-ray background. The ATLAS Anti-kt4 Jet algorithm is used. Only reconstructed jets with Pt&gt;20 <NOP>GeV and |eta|&lt;2.5 are included. The upper plot shows the distribution of jet Pt in cosmic-ray data without requiring a jet cleaning cut (the blue circles), after applying the cut on the EM fraction (the blue open circles) and after applying the cut on LLR (the blue squares) at a fixed jet efficiency of 98%. The three lines in the same figure show the distributions of the jet Pt from dijet simulation before cleaning cuts, after the EM fraction cut and after the LLR cut, respectively. Here, the LLR is obtained using all three jet variables: jet Rcone, Ratio_LC and EM fraction. Similar plots for mixed cosmic-ray data and simulation events compared to cosmic-ray data are shown in the bottom figure.
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Application-cosmic.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.eps][cosmic.eps]]</b>
<b>[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/Application-mixed.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.eps][mixed.eps]]</b>
</td> <td align="center"><img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Application-cosmic.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.gif" height="263" /> <img width="342" alt="" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/Application-mixed.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.gif" height="263" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td bgcolor="#eeeeee">

</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

<!--***********************************************************--> <!--Do NOT remove the remaining lines, but add requested info as appropriate--> <!--***********************************************************-->

---

<!--For significant updates to the topic, consider adding your 'signature' (beneath this editing box)--> *Major updates*:%BR% -- Main.RichardTeuscher - 08-Mar-2010

<!--Person responsible for the page: 
Either leave as is - the creator's name will be inserted; 
Or replace the complete REVINFO tag (including percentages symbols) with a name in the form Main.TwikiUsersName--> 
%RESPONSIBLE% %REVINFO{"$wikiusername" rev="1.1"}% %BR% <!--Once this page has been reviewed, please add the name and the date e.g. Main.StephenHaywood - 31 Oct 2006 --> 
%REVIEW% *Never reviewed*

%STOPINCLUDE%

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who
eps	Application-cosmic.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.eps	r2 r1	manage	12.2 K	2010-04-12 - 14:16	YingchunZhu
gif	Application-cosmic.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.gif	r2 r1	manage	23.0 K	2010-03-08 - 18:32	YingchunZhu
eps	Application-mixed.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.eps	r2 r1	manage	13.2 K	2010-04-12 - 14:16	YingchunZhu
gif	Application-mixed.vs.dijet-0.98eff-antikt.gif	r2 r1	manage	23.4 K	2010-03-08 - 18:32	YingchunZhu
eps	fEM-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	13.4 K	2010-04-12 - 14:15	YingchunZhu
gif	fEM-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	20.2 K	2010-03-08 - 18:33	YingchunZhu
eps	fEM-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	13.7 K	2010-04-12 - 14:12	YingchunZhu
gif	fEM-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	20.2 K	2010-03-08 - 18:33	YingchunZhu
eps	JetPt-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	11.9 K	2010-04-12 - 14:12	YingchunZhu
gif	JetPt-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	18.7 K	2010-03-08 - 18:35	YingchunZhu
eps	JetPtraw-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	11.5 K	2010-04-12 - 14:15	YingchunZhu
gif	JetPtraw-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	17.1 K	2010-03-08 - 18:35	YingchunZhu
eps	LLRfinal-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.eps	r2 r1	manage	11.5 K	2010-04-12 - 14:16	YingchunZhu
gif	LLRfinal-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.gif	r2 r1	manage	18.1 K	2010-03-08 - 18:36	YingchunZhu
eps	MET-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	11.4 K	2010-04-12 - 14:14	YingchunZhu
gif	MET-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	17.3 K	2010-03-08 - 18:36	YingchunZhu
eps	MET-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	12.0 K	2010-04-12 - 14:11	YingchunZhu
gif	MET-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	19.1 K	2010-03-08 - 18:37	YingchunZhu
eps	Ratio-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	10.7 K	2010-04-12 - 14:15	YingchunZhu
gif	Ratio-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	19.0 K	2010-03-08 - 18:37	YingchunZhu
eps	Ratio-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	13.9 K	2010-04-12 - 14:12	YingchunZhu
gif	Ratio-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	20.3 K	2010-03-08 - 18:38	YingchunZhu
eps	Rcone-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	10.2 K	2010-04-12 - 14:15	YingchunZhu
gif	Rcone-antikt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	19.2 K	2010-03-08 - 18:38	YingchunZhu
eps	Rcone-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	14.3 K	2010-04-12 - 14:12	YingchunZhu
gif	Rcone-cosmics-real-MC-Pt20-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	21.2 K	2010-03-08 - 18:38	YingchunZhu
eps	Rej-eff-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.eps	r2 r1	manage	65.1 K	2010-04-12 - 14:16	YingchunZhu
gif	Rej-eff-mixed.vs.dijet-antikt.gif	r2 r1	manage	15.9 K	2010-03-08 - 18:39	YingchunZhu
eps	SumEt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	11.5 K	2010-04-12 - 14:14	YingchunZhu
gif	SumEt-cosmic-mixed-dijet.gif	r2 r1	manage	17.1 K	2010-03-08 - 18:39	YingchunZhu
eps	SumEt-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.eps	r4 r3 r2 r1	manage	12.0 K	2010-04-12 - 14:11	YingchunZhu
gif	SumEt-cosmics-real-MC-EMscale.gif	r2 r1	manage	18.9 K	2010-03-08 - 18:40	YingchunZhu

This topic: AtlasPublic > WebHome > Approved2009CosmicPlotsJetEtMiss
Topic revision: r10 - 2010-12-06 - ElmarRitsch

Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback