AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png

ApprovedPlotsTileMinimumBiasSystem

Introduction

This page lists the public plots illustrating Minimum Bias system results,

Minimum Bias System

During the LHC collisions a dedicated TileCal readout provides measurement of the anode current for every photomultplier. An average anode current for A13 cell of the TileCal is shown as a functon of the instant luminosity on full data sample taken in 2010. The errors on the current are the quadratc sum of the statstcal and systematc errors. The red lines are obtained from the linear ft of the data points.
Contact: Jalal.Abdallah@cern.ch , korolkov@ifae.es and ggonzalez@ifae.es
Reference: CDS ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-002		 CurrentVsLuminosity.png
[eps]
Distribution of the Tile Calorimeter relatve anode current measured in 2010 collisions in LBA A4 (PMT 19) using the integrator data collected during runs 166142, 166786, 167844, and 167776, where the instant luminosity ranges from 0.5 x 10^32 to 1.8 x 10^32 cm-2s-1. The module number is shown on the X-axis, while the Y-axis shows the relatve anode current. The error bars represent the run to run variaton of the measurement (RMS), also shown separately on the botom plot. This variaton is typical about 0.5% refectng the stability of the system. The standard deviaton module to module is about 1.5%, and the dashed lines represent a ±2.5% band enclosing 90% of the measurements.
Contact: Jalal.Abdallah@cern.ch , korolkov@ifae.es and ggonzalez@ifae.es
Reference: CDS ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-002		 FinalUniformity-3.png
[eps]
During the LHC collisions a dedicated TileCal readout (Minimum Bias) provides measurement of the anode current for every photomultiplier. Anode current of a cell type is shown as a function of η for the three TileCal layers using data collected in 2011 with the MinBias system (bad PMTs are not considered). The instant luminosity is 1.9x10^32 cm-2s-1 inducing a typical current in the central region |η|<0.5 of 3, 1 and 0.05 nA in the A, BC and D layers respectively. Cell type D0 is omitted.
Contact: Jalal Abdallah Jalal.Abdallah@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, korolkov@ifae.es and Garoe Gonzalez ggonzalez@ifaeNOSPAMPLEASE.es
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-006
Date: 30 May 2011 		CurrentVsCell.png
[eps]
Current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 207046 of the 2012 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 4.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.png
[eps]
Luminosity coefficient (current/instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 207046 of the 2012 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 4.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average inst. luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.png
[eps]
Current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 276262 of the 2015 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.4 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png
[eps]
Luminosity coefficient (current/ instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 276262 of the 2015 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.4 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding avarage inst. luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png
[eps]
Current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 276262 of the 2015 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.4 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png
[eps]
Luminosity coefficient (current/instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 276262 of the 2015 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.4 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding avarage inst. luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png
[eps]
Current vs. instantaneous luminosity measured by Minimum Bias system during the proton-proton collision data taking in 2015. The currents were measured by PMT 17 of module 22 in the C-side Extended Barrel. This channel belongs to cell D5, which is stable within 1-2% over 2015 data taking period. The considered runs are spread over the whole data taking period and fulfill the quality requirements used for physics analyses. The profile of the 2D histogram is drawn as black points. A linear dependence of the current with respect to the instantaneous luminosity can be observed.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_2015.png
[eps]
Average current vs. instantaneous luminosity measured by Minimum Bias system during the proton-proton collision data taking in 2015. The currents were measured by PMT 17 of module 22 in the C-side Extended Barrel. This channel belongs to cell D5, which is stable within 1-2% over 2015 data taking period. The considered runs are spread over the whole data taking period and fulfill the quality requirements used for physics analyses. A linear fit has been performed. The fit parameters are given in the upper panel of the plot. The lower panel shows the ratio of the current over the fitted function. A good linear description of the current vs instantaneous luminosity can be observed.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 4 May 2016 		CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_ratioPlot_2015.png
[eps]
Current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 298633 of the 2016 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 30 May 2016 		Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png
[eps]
Luminosity coefficient (current/ instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 298633 of the 2016 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average instantaneous luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 30 May 2016 		Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png
[eps]
Current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 298633 of the 2016 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 30 May 2016 		Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png
[eps]
Luminosity coefficient (current/instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 298633 of the 2016 data period. A range of 30 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 0.2 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average instantaneous luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, and Cora Fischer cora.fischer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 30 May 2016 		Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png
[eps]
PMT anode current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 325713 of the 2017 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 2.8 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 14 May 2018 		Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png
[eps][pdf]
Luminosity coefficient (PMT anode current/ instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 325713 of the 2017 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 2.8 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average instantaneous luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 14 May 2018 		Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png
[eps][pdf]
PMT anode current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 325713 of the 2017 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 2.8 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 14 May 2018 		Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png
[eps][pdf]
Luminosity coefficient (PMT anode current/instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 325713 of the 2017 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 2.8 x 1033 cm-2 s-1 (as measured online by ATLAS preferred algorithm). Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average instantaneous luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 14 May 2018 		Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png
[eps] [pdf]
PMT anode current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 348610 of the 2018 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 1.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 5 Noviembre 2018 		Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png
[eps][pdf]
Luminosity coefficient (PMT anode current over instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 348610 of the 2018 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 1.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average inst. luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/ average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 5 Noviembre 2018 		Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png
[eps] [pdf]
PMT anode current vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 348610 of the 2018 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 1.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average current for all channels belonging to a cell is shown in this plot. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents. Compared to previous years, the currents for E3 and E4 cells (1.2<| η|<1.6) have changed given a decrease in operating HV used in the counters.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 5 Noviembre 2018 		Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png
[eps][pdf]
Luminosity coefficient (PMT anode current over instantaneous luminosity) vs η measured by Minimum Bias system in proton-proton collision data collected during run 348610 of the 2018 data period. A range of 20 consecutive lumiblocks (time interval) has been used. The average of the corresponding instantaneous luminosity is 1.7 x 1033 cm-2 s-1. Each cell of the Tile Calorimeter covers a range in η. The cells are distributed over 64 modules in phi and read out by one or two PMTs. The average currents for all channels belonging to a cell have been used to calculate the luminosity coefficient by dividing by the corresponding average inst. luminosity. The error bars represent the standard deviation of currents/ average inst. luminosity measured for a given cell. Different sets of gains are used in the cells in the gap/ crack region (E-cells) to measure the higher currents. Compared to previous years, the coefficients for E3 and E4 cells (1.2<|η|<1.6) have changed given a decrease in operating HV used in the counters.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 5 Noviembre 2018 		Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png
[eps] [pdf]

Major updates:
-- PawelKlimek - 2016-08-17

Responsible: PawelKlimek
Subject: public

Attachments Attachments
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.eps r1 manage 15.1 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.png r1 manage 109.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.eps r1 manage 14.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png r1 manage 108.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.eps r1 manage 14.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png r1 manage 198.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.eps r1 manage 14.8 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PDFpdf Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.pdf r1 manage 15.3 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png r1 manage 461.7 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.eps r1 manage 14.7 K 2018-11-05 - 14:30 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [EPS]
PDFpdf Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.pdf r1 manage 64.7 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png r1 manage 467.7 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.eps r1 manage 16.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png r1 manage 110.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.eps r1 manage 16.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png r1 manage 199.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:55 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.eps r1 manage 16.3 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PDFpdf Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png r1 manage 464.2 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
Unknown file formateps Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.eps r1 manage 16.0 K 2018-11-05 - 14:30 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [EPS]
PDFpdf Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.pdf r1 manage 66.5 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
PNGpng Coeff_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png r1 manage 464.2 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
Unknown file formateps CurrentVsCell.eps r1 manage 13.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng CurrentVsCell.png r1 manage 20.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_2015.eps r1 manage 14.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_2015.png r1 manage 119.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_ratioPlot_2015.eps r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng CurrentVsLumi_MBias_EBC_m22_c17_ratioPlot_2015.png r1 manage 126.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps CurrentVsLuminosity.eps r1 manage 20.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng CurrentVsLuminosity.png r1 manage 24.0 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.eps r1 manage 14.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2012_30_207046.png r1 manage 102.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.eps r1 manage 14.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png r1 manage 97.1 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.eps r1 manage 14.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png r1 manage 179.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.eps r1 manage 15.3 K 2018-05-14 - 17:36 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PDFpdf Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2018-05-14 - 17:36 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png r1 manage 453.7 K 2018-05-14 - 17:36 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.eps r1 manage 14.3 K 2018-11-05 - 14:30 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [EPS]
PDFpdf Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.pdf r1 manage 64.5 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_PROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png r1 manage 430.1 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.eps r1 manage 16.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2015_30_276262.png r1 manage 100.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.eps r1 manage 16.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2016_30_298633.png r1 manage 187.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.eps r1 manage 15.8 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PDFpdf Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.pdf r1 manage 15.7 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713.png r1 manage 436.0 K 2018-05-14 - 17:35 ArelyCG Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2017_20_325713
Unknown file formateps Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.eps r1 manage 15.5 K 2018-11-05 - 14:30 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [EPS]
PDFpdf Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.pdf r1 manage 66.2 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
PNGpng Current_vs_eta_logPROF_instLumi_2018_20_348610.png r1 manage 429.8 K 2018-11-05 - 14:31 ArelyCG MinBias Currents and Lumi Coefficients 2018 [PDF,PNG]
PNGpng FinalUniformity-3.png r1 manage 17.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:56 PawelKlimek  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r5 - 2018-11-05 - ArelyCG
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    Atlas All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback