AtlasPublicTopicHeader.png

ApprovedPlotsTileSingleParticleResponse

Introduction

This page lists the public plots illustrating single particle response. See also ApprovedPlotsTileEnergyCalibration for single-beam and cosmic muon data

Single Particle Response

Collision muons

The $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution of measured by Cell D3 using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulation. The generator Sherpa 2.2.1 is used to simulate the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ process. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2017 which amount to integrated luminosity of 44.3 fb-1. The error bars are purely statistical. The last bin includes the overflow content. The red arrows in the ratio plot indicates points outside the plotted range.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022
D3_dedx_17.png
pdf, eps
The $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution of measured by Cell BC3 using experimental data and Monte Carlo simulation. The generator Sherpa 2.2.1 is used to simulate the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ process. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2018 which amount to integrated luminosity of 58.5 fb-1. The error bars are purely statistical. The last bin includes the overflow content. The red arrows in the ratio plot indicates points outside the plotted range.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 19 August 2022
BC3_dedx_18.png
pdf, eps
Ratio of the truncated mean of $\Delta E / \Delta x$ between data and simulation $R$ as a function of the Tile Calorimeter module for cell A-3 using single isolated muons from proton-proton collision. The truncation removes the events with the highest 1% of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution. The error bars represent the standard statistical error on the mean of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution propagated to the ratio. A Gaussian likelihood is performed on the $R$ values and the $\mu$ (red line) and $s$ (yellow band) value corresponds to the fitted mean and additional uncertainty on top of the statistical error. The $\mu$ and $s$ are interpreted as the cell response ratio average and the non-uniformity over the azimuthal modules. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2015-2016 which amounts to integrated luminosity of 36.2 fb$^{-1}$.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
A-3.png
pdf, eps
Ratio of the truncated mean of $\Delta E / \Delta x$ between data and simulation $R$ as a function of the Tile Calorimeter module for cell D5 using single isolated muons from proton-proton collision. The truncation removes the events with the highest 1% of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution. The error bars represent the standard statistical error on the mean of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution propagated to the ratio. A Gaussian likelihood is performed on the $R$ values and the $\mu$ (red line) and $s$ (yellow band) value corresponds to the fitted mean and additional uncertainty on top of the statistical error. The $\mu$ and $s$ are interpreted as the cell response ratio average and the non-uniformity over the azimuthal modules. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2018 which amounts to integrated luminosity of 44.3 fb$^{-1}$.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022 Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
D5.png
pdf, eps
Ratio of the truncated mean of $\Delta E / \Delta x$ between data and simulation $R$ as a function of the Tile Calorimeter module for cell BC2 using single isolated muons from proton-proton collision. The truncation removes the events with the highest 1% of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution. The error bars represent the standard statistical error on the mean of the $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution propagated to the ratio. A Gaussian likelihood is performed on the $R$ values and the $μ$ (red line) and s (yellow band) value corresponds to the fitted mean and additional uncertainty on top of the statistical error. The $\mu$ and $s$ are interpreted as the cell response ratio average and the non-uniformity over the azimuthal modules. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2018 which amounts to integrated luminosity of 58.5 fb-1.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 10 May 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
BC2_R_module.png
pdf, eps
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the average response ratio of each cell using single isolated muons from proton-proton collisions. The average is done over 64 azimuthal modules for each cell by performing a Gaussian likelihood fit. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2015-2016 which amount to integrated luminosity of 36.2 fb$^{-1}$. Cells with $|\eta| < 0.1$ and the gap scintillators are not included in the analysis due to insufficient steel/scintillator elements traversed by the muons.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
mu_201516.png
pdf, eps
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the average response ratio of each cell using single isolated muons from proton-proton collisions. The average is done over 64 azimuthal modules for each cell by performing a Gaussian likelihood fit. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2017 which amount to integrated luminosity of 44.3 fb$^{-1}$. Cells with $|\eta| < 0.1$ and the gap scintillators are not included in the analysis due to insufficient steel/scintillator elements traversed by the muons.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
mu_2017.png
pdf, eps
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the average response ratio of each cell using single isolated muons from proton-proton collisions. The average is done over 64 azimuthal modules for each cell by performing a Gaussian likelihood fit. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2018 which amount to integrated luminosity of 58.5 fb$^{-1}$. Cells with $|\eta| < 0.1$ and the gap scintillators are not included in the analysis due to insufficient steel/scintillator elements traversed by the muons.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 10 may 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
mu_2018.png
pdf, eps
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the response non-uniformity over $\phi$ of each cell using single isolated muons from proton-proton collisions. The non-uniformity is calculated for each cell by measuring the spread of the response ratio across 64 azimuthal modules using a Gaussian likelihood fit. The data used are the LHC collision data recorded by ATLAS during 2017 which amount to integrated luminosity of 44.3 fb-1. Cells with $|\eta| < 0.1$ and the gap scintillators are not included in the analysis due to insufficient steel/scintillator elements traversed by the muons.
Contact: Stefio Yosse Andrean stefio.yosse.andrean@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Date: 19 August 2022
Reference: ATL-TILECAL-INT-2022-002
s_2017.png
pdf, eps
Truncated $\Delta E / \Delta x$ distribution for calorimeter cell D5 module 10 obtained using 2011 experimental and simulated $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ collision data. For each muon the deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
DISTRIBUTION_EBC-D5_m10_2011.pdf
pdf version
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the response $\Delta E / \Delta x$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 muon experimental data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. For each muon the deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using an non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_response2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the response $\Delta E / \Delta x$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 muon experimental data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. For each muon the deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using an non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_response2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the double ratio response $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_rato_response2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the double ratio response $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_rato_response2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the estimated dispersion of the relative cell response $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_rato_sigma2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the estimated dispersion of the relative cell response $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_rato_sigma2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Schematic overview of the Tile Calorimeter showing the double ratio response change between 2011 and 2012 $\tfrac{R_{2012} - R_{2011}}{R_{2011}}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 and 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Numbers are in percentage.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
legend_time2.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Distribution of the the double ratio response changes between 2011 and 2012 $\tfrac{R_{2012} - R_{2011}}{R_{2011}}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each cell type, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 and 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental data and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Shown are the mean and the statistical error on the mean of the distribution. Numbers are in percentage.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
hist_delta2.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal innermost layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_A_2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal innermost layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_A_2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal middle layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown. The outliers at $\eta = \pm0.95$ represent the response of the calorimeter cells C10.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_B_2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal middle layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown. The outliers at $\eta = \pm0.95$ represent the response of the calorimeter cells C10.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_B_2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal outermost layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2011 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_D_2011.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter cell responses $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data}$ and $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ and ratio $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ versus pseudorapidity $\eta$ for the ATLAS TileCal outermost layer, obtained from the average in $\phi$ of the truncated means for each cell using 2012 experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points. Statistical errors are shown.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
LAYER_RATO_D_2012.pdf
pdf version of the figure
The ATLAS Tile Calorimeter double ratio response $\left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{data} / \left(\Delta E / \Delta x\right)_\mathrm{MC}$ to $W\rightarrow\mu\nu$ muons from collisions for each radial layer, obtained from the weighted average in $\eta$ for each cell type using experimental and simulated data. Cell types with $\eta<0.1$ and the gap/crack scintillators are not taken into account in the analysis. The deposited energy $\Delta E$ is reconstructed at EM scale using a non-iterative Optimal Filtering algorithm for experimental and simulated data. The path length $\Delta x$ of the muon through a calorimeter cell was evaluated as the distance between the entrance and exit points.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 2nd September 2015
timeBarrels.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Ratios of the D5+D6 cells muon signals over the noise (SNR), as a function of the muon track η, for standard offline readout of 2012 data and for LVL1 readout as measured in 2011 during pp collisions, zoomed in the region of interest in η.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 22nd June 2013
SNRmuons4bins3.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Ratios of the D5+D6 cells muon signals over the noise (SNR), as a function of the muon track η, for standard offline readout of 2012 data and for LVL1 readout as measured in 2011 during pp collisions, zoomed in the region of interest in η.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Date: 22nd June 2013
SNRmuons3bins3.pdf
pdf version of the figure
Average energy response versus η in TileCal D5 and D6 cells (η>0), using collision muons in 2012 data. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout event-by-event, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut). The sum D5+D6 is shown in full circles, the individual cells D5 and D6 in open circles. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. η of the muon is obtained by extrapolating the muon track from the Inner Track through Tile Calorimeter to the Muon Spectrometer. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in &eta of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions
Average energy response versus η in TileCal D5 and D6 cells (η<0), using collision muons in 2012 data. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout event-by-event, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut). The sum D5+D6 is shown in full circles, the individual cells D5 and D6 in open circles. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. η of the muon is obtained by extrapolating the muon track from the Inner Track through Tile Calorimeter to the Muon Spectrometer. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in &eta of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions
Average energy response in TileCal D5 (η>0) versus Δφ, using collision muons in 2012 data. Δφ represents the angle from the center of a Tile Calorimeter module to the center of the adjacent module, ranging from 0 to 2π/64 rad. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut), integrated over the entire η ranges of the cell. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. The decrease in response in the interface between two adjacent modules is 5% due to the gap of a few millimeters that allows for the WLS fibres to run to the outer radius of the calorimeter between two modules. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in η of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions
Average energy response in TileCal D5 (η<0) versus Δφ, using collision muons in 2012 data. Δφ represents the angle from the center of a Tile Calorimeter module to the center of the adjacent module, ranging from 0 to 2π/64 rad. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut), integrated over the entire η ranges of the cell. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. The decrease in response in the interface between two adjacent modules is 5% due to the gap of a few millimeters that allows for the WLS fibres to run to the outer radius of the calorimeter between two modules. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in η of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions
Average energy response in TileCal D6 (η>0) versus Δφ, using collision muons in 2012 data. Δφ represents the angle from the center of a Tile Calorimeter module to the center of the adjacent module, ranging from 0 to 2π/64 rad. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut), integrated over the entire η ranges of the cell. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. The decrease in response in the interface between two adjacent modules is 5% due to the gap of a few millimeters that allows for the WLS fibres to run to the outer radius of the calorimeter between two modules. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in η of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions
Average energy response in TileCal D6 (η<0) versus Δφ, using collision muons in 2012 data. Δφ represents the angle from the center of a Tile Calorimeter module to the center of the adjacent module, ranging from 0 to 2π/64 rad. Shown is the average response measured by summing the contributions of both PMTs from the double readout, between 200 MeV (lower cut) and 20 GeV (upper cut), integrated over the entire η ranges of the cell. The error bars represent the standard error on the mean. The decrease in response in the interface between two adjacent modules is 5% due to the gap of a few millimeters that allows for the WLS fibres to run to the outer radius of the calorimeter between two modules. W → μν events are selected using cuts in missing transverse energy ET > 40 GeV and transverse mass MT > 25 GeV. Events are required to have a single reconstructed muon track.
Contact: Marco van Woerden Marius.Cornelis.van.Woerden@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-009
Date: 22nd June 2013
Scan in η of the Tile Calorimeter using muons from collisions

Single hadrons

Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum, E/p, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 144.9 pb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2017. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using Pythia 8.186 with the A14 tune and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter to be at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to simulation. The average of the E/p distribution is 0.5896 ± 0.0001 (0.593 ± 0.001) for data (simulation), only including statistical uncertainty.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATL-COM-TILECAL-2022-006
Date: 9 may 2022
data2107_EoP.png
pdf version, eps version
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum, E/p, as a function of pseudo-rapidity integrated over the phi coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 144.9 pb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2017. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using Pythia 8.186 with the A14 tune and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter to be at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to simulation. Systematic uncertainty on the ratio covers effects due to contamination from neutral particles and energy mis-measurements due to energy loss in the dead material in front of the calorimeter.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATL-COM-TILECAL-2022-006
Date: 9 may 2022
data2017_EoP_eta_sys.png
pdf version, eps version
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum, E/p, as a function of phi integrated over the pseudo-rapidity coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 144.9 pb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2017. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using Pythia 8.186 with the A14 tune and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter to be at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to simulation. Systematic uncertainty on the ratio covers effects due to contamination from neutral particles and energy mis-measurements due to energy loss in the dead material in front of the calorimeter.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATL-COM-TILECAL-2022-006
Date: 9 may 2022
data2017_EoP_phi_sys.png
pdf version, eps version
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum, E/p, as a function of momentum integrated over the phi and pseudo-rapidity coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 144.9 pb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2017. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using Pythia 8.186 with the A14 tune and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter to be at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to simulation. Systematic uncertainty on the ratio covers effects due to contamination from neutral particles and energy mis-measurements due to energy loss in the dead material in front of the calorimeter.
Contact: Arely Cortes Gonzalez arelycg@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATL-COM-TILECAL-2022-006
Date: 9 may 2022
data2017_EoP_p_bin_sys.png
pdf version, eps version
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum (E/p), as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 1.6 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A2 tune, and the MSTW2008 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. The average of the E/p distribution is 0.64.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_eop_lowmu.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons (logarithmic scale), characterised by energy over momentum (E/p), as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 1.6 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A2 tune, and the MSTW2008 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. The average of the E/p distribution is 0.64.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_eop_lowmu_logy.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (E/p) as a function of momentum, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and φ coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 1.6 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A2 tune, and the MSTW2008 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_lowmu.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of pseudo-rapidity integrated over the φ coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 1.6 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A2 tune, and the MSTW2008 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_lowmu.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of φ integrated over the pseudo-rapidity coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 1.6 fb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The fraction of events with additional simultaneous proton-proton collisions (pile-up) was negligible. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A2 tune, and the MSTW2008 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_lowmu.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by energy over momentum (E/p), as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. The average of the E/p distribution is 0.78.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_eop_pileup.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons (logarithmic scale), characterised by energy over momentum (E/p), as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the blue line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation. The average of the E/p distribution is 0.78.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_eop_pileup_logy.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of momentum, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and φ coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the red line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_pileup.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of pseudo-rapidity integrated over the φ coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the red line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_pileup.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of φ integrated over the pseudo-rapidity coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the red line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_pileup.png
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter response to single isolated charged hadrons, characterised by the mean of the energy over momentum (<E/p>) as a function of pile-up (<μ>), integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and φ coverage of the calorimeter, as measured by the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter using 417.8 nb-1 of proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV collected in 2015. The data is compared to simulated events generated using PYTHIA 8.186, with the A14 tune, and the NNPDF23 LO parton distribution function set. The energy is reconstructed from topological clusters matched to a track in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Tracks are required to pass minimum quality criteria and p > 2 GeV. To reduce contamination from neutral hadrons and muons, the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter is required to be less than 1 GeV, and the fraction of energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter at least 70%. Black dots represent data and the red line represents simulation. Statistical uncertainties are shown for data and simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation.
Contact: Joakim Olsson joakim.olsson@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2016-050
Date: 20 July 2017
tile_2015_avgeop_vs_mu_avg_pileup.png
pdf version of the figure
Mean value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $\eta$, integrated over all $p$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the mean value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Bins with low statistics with track $|\eta| > 1.6$ have been removed.
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_eta_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png
eps version of the figure
Mean value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $\phi$, integrated over all $p$ and $\eta$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the mean value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Each bin cover a dphi range of ~0.4
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_phi_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png
eps version of the figure
Mean value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $p$, integrated over all $\eta$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the mean value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Bins after 20 GeV due to the lack of statistics.
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_p_mean_PCorr0_Tile.png
eps version of the figure
RMS value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $\eta$, integrated over all $p$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the RMS value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Bins with low statistics in the range $|\eta| > 1.6$ have been removed.
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_eta_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png
eps version of the figure
RMS value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $\phi$, integrated over all $p$ and $\eta$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the RMS value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Each bin cover a dphi range of ~0.4.
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_phi_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png
eps version of the figure
RMS value of the $E/p$ variable as a function of $p$, integrated over all $\eta$ ranges for 2010 Data and Monte Carlo simulation. $E$ refers to the energy deposited in the Tile Calorimeter ($|\eta| < 1.7$) by the isolated charged particles with momentum $p$ and pseudorapidity $\eta$ (excluding the energy deposited in the scintillators). Charged particles have been selected applying a MIP-like signal requirement for the energy deposition in the LAr calorimeter. Bottom plot: Data/MC ratio of the RMS value of the $E/p$ variable, fitted with a constant function. The error shown is only statistical. Bins after 20 GeV are removed due to the lack of statistics.
Contact: Antonella Sucurro Antonella.Sucurro@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2011-001
Date: 24 March 2011
eop_p_rms_PCorr0_Tile.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of pseudo-rapidity, integrated over the phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same pseudo-rapidity bins. The largest disagreement is 10% for 0.9 < |η| < 1.1.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_Tilevseta.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks, showering predominantly in Layer A, as a function of pseudo-rapidity, integrated over the phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same pseudo-rapidity bins. The largest disagreement is 10% for 0.9 < η < 1.1.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerA.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks, showering predominantly in Layer BC, as a function of pseudo-rapidity, integrated over the phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same pseudo-rapidity bins. The largest disagreement is 12% for -1.1 < η < -0.9.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerB.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of momentum, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same momentum bins. The largest disagreement is 12% for 11 < p < 12 GeV.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_Tilevsp.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks, showering predominantly in Layer A, as a function of momentum, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same pseudo-rapidity bins. The largest disagreement is 14% for 11 < p < 12 GeV.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_Tilevsp_LayerA.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2011 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 7 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in transverse momentum. The energy of the track is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of phi, integrated over the |η| < 0.7. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same phi bins. The largest disagreement is 10% for 0.9 < Φ < 1.1.
Contact: David Jennens David.Jennens@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2013-011 ATL-COM-TILECAL-2013-034
Date: 10 July 2013
2011_EoP_TilevsCaloPhi_LongBarrel.png
eps version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2012 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 8 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in momentum. The energy of the isolated hadron is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of pseudo-rapidity, integrated over the phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same pseudo-rapidity bins. The largest disagreement is 9% for η < -1.5.
Contact: Leonor Cerda Alberich and Carlos Solans
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2015-014
Date: 2nd March 2015
E/p vs eta
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2012 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 8 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in momentum. The energy of the isolated hadron is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of momentum, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same momentum bins. The largest disagreement is 18% for 9 < p < 10 GeV.
Contact: Leonor Cerda Alberich and Carlos Solans
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2015-014
Date: 2nd March 2015
E/p vs p
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2012 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 8 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in momentum. The energy of the isolated hadron is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of phi, integrated over the η coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same phi bins. The largest disagreement is 11% for -0.6 < φ < -0.4.
Contact: Leonor Cerda Alberich and Carlos Solans
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2015-014
Date: 2nd March 2015
E/p vs φ
pdf version of the figure
Calorimeter Response characterised by energy over momentum (E/p) for isolated tracks, as measured with the Tile Calorimeter, using proton-proton collision data from 2012 in the Minimum Bias stream. Minimum Bias monte carlo is generated using Pythia 6 and simulated using Geant4, with the QGSP_Bertini physics list. Simulation is normalized to data using 8 bins in pseudo-rapidity and 16 bins in momentum. The energy of the isolated hadron is reconstructed using all nearby clusters in a cone of ΔR < 0.2. Selected tracks pass minimum quality criteria, have pT > 2 GeV and deposit less than 1 GeV in the electromagnetic calorimeter. The plot shows the mean of the E/p ratio for hadronic tracks as a function of μ, integrated over the pseudo-rapidity and phi coverage of Tile Calorimeter. Black dots represent data and red dots represent simulation. The lower plot shows the ratio of data to simulation in the same μ bins. The largest disagreement is 4% for 6 < μ < 9.
Contact: Leonor Cerda Alberich and Carlos Solans
Reference: ATLAS-PLOT-TILECAL-2015-014
Date: 2nd March 2015
E/p vs mu
pdf version of the figure


Major updates:
-- PawelKlimek - 2016-08-17

Responsible: PawelKlimek
Subject: public

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_TilevsCaloPhi_LongBarrel.eps r1 manage 24.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_TilevsCaloPhi_LongBarrel.png r1 manage 24.0 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_Tilevseta.eps r1 manage 16.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_Tilevseta.png r1 manage 17.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerA.eps r1 manage 16.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerA.png r1 manage 17.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerB.eps r1 manage 16.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_Tilevseta_LayerB.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_Tilevsp.eps r1 manage 18.1 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_Tilevsp.png r1 manage 20.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps 2011_EoP_Tilevsp_LayerA.eps r1 manage 18.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng 2011_EoP_Tilevsp_LayerA.png r1 manage 20.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:28 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps A-3.eps r1 manage 17.2 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf A-3.pdf r1 manage 20.1 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng A-3.png r1 manage 20.5 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps BC2_R_module.eps r1 manage 17.1 K 2022-05-10 - 11:20 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf BC2_R_module.pdf r2 r1 manage 29.8 K 2022-06-14 - 10:37 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng BC2_R_module.png r1 manage 20.0 K 2022-05-10 - 11:20 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps BC3_dedx_18.eps r1 manage 30.3 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf BC3_dedx_18.pdf r1 manage 24.9 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng BC3_dedx_18.png r1 manage 28.4 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps D3_dedx_17.eps r1 manage 30.8 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf D3_dedx_17.pdf r1 manage 25.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng D3_dedx_17.png r1 manage 29.2 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps D5.eps r1 manage 17.1 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf D5.pdf r1 manage 20.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng D5.png r1 manage 19.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:19 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng D5A_side.png r1 manage 47.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng D5C_side.png r1 manage 47.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng D6A_side.png r1 manage 49.1 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng D6C_side.png r1 manage 49.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng DETA_Aside.png r1 manage 59.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng DETA_Cside.png r1 manage 60.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf DISTRIBUTION_EBC-D5_m10_2011.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf Eopvseta2012.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.2 K 2016-09-22 - 15:56 CarlosSolans  
PNGpng Eopvseta2012.png r2 r1 manage 252.2 K 2016-09-22 - 15:58 CarlosSolans  
PDFpdf Eopvsmu2012.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng Eopvsmu2012.png r1 manage 103.0 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf Eopvsp2012.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.9 K 2016-09-22 - 16:00 CarlosSolans  
PNGpng Eopvsp2012.png r2 r1 manage 244.6 K 2016-09-22 - 16:00 CarlosSolans  
PDFpdf Eopvsphi2012.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.4 K 2016-09-22 - 16:00 CarlosSolans  
PNGpng Eopvsphi2012.png r2 r1 manage 267.0 K 2016-09-22 - 16:01 CarlosSolans  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_A_2011.pdf r1 manage 22.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_A_2012.pdf r1 manage 22.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_B_2011.pdf r1 manage 22.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_B_2012.pdf r1 manage 21.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_D_2011.pdf r1 manage 18.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf LAYER_RATO_D_2012.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf SNRmuons3bins3.pdf r1 manage 37.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng SNRmuons3bins3.png r1 manage 192.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf SNRmuons4bins3.pdf r1 manage 38.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng SNRmuons4bins3.png r1 manage 36.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps data2017_EoP.eps r1 manage 37.4 K 2022-05-09 - 17:55 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p eps version
PDFpdf data2017_EoP.pdf r1 manage 23.4 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p pdf version
PNGpng data2017_EoP.png r1 manage 27.2 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p png version
Unknown file formateps data2017_EoP_eta_sys.eps r1 manage 27.5 K 2022-05-09 - 17:55 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p eps version
PDFpdf data2017_EoP_eta_sys.pdf r1 manage 18.2 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p pdf version
PNGpng data2017_EoP_eta_sys.png r1 manage 22.2 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p png version
Unknown file formateps data2017_EoP_p_bin_sys.eps r1 manage 26.4 K 2022-05-09 - 17:55 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p eps version
PDFpdf data2017_EoP_p_bin_sys.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p pdf version
PNGpng data2017_EoP_p_bin_sys.png r1 manage 23.4 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p png version
Unknown file formateps data2017_EoP_phi_sys.eps r1 manage 31.8 K 2022-05-09 - 17:55 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p eps version
PDFpdf data2017_EoP_phi_sys.pdf r1 manage 20.4 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p pdf version
PNGpng data2017_EoP_phi_sys.png r1 manage 22.3 K 2022-05-09 - 17:56 ArelyCG data 2017 single hadron E/p png version
Unknown file formateps eop_eta_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.eps r1 manage 17.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_eta_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png r1 manage 15.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps eop_eta_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.eps r1 manage 17.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_eta_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png r1 manage 14.8 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps eop_p_mean_PCorr0_Tile.eps r1 manage 16.9 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_p_mean_PCorr0_Tile.png r1 manage 15.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps eop_p_rms_PCorr0_Tile.eps r1 manage 17.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_p_rms_PCorr0_Tile.png r1 manage 15.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps eop_phi_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.eps r1 manage 18.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_phi_mean_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png r1 manage 15.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps eop_phi_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.eps r1 manage 17.6 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PNGpng eop_phi_rms_PCorr0_Tile_pInt0.png r1 manage 14.7 K 2016-08-17 - 19:29 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf hist_delta2.pdf r1 manage 13.2 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_rato_response2011.pdf r1 manage 19.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_rato_response2012.pdf r1 manage 19.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_rato_sigma2011.pdf r1 manage 19.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_rato_sigma2012.pdf r1 manage 19.3 K 2016-08-17 - 19:30 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_response2011.pdf r1 manage 19.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_response2012.pdf r1 manage 19.5 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
PDFpdf legend_time2.pdf r1 manage 20.4 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
Unknown file formateps mu_201516.eps r1 manage 48.5 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf mu_201516.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng mu_201516.png r1 manage 60.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps mu_2017.eps r1 manage 48.7 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf mu_2017.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng mu_2017.png r1 manage 58.8 K 2022-08-19 - 10:09 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps mu_2018.eps r1 manage 48.8 K 2022-05-10 - 11:20 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf mu_2018.pdf r2 r1 manage 105.0 K 2022-06-14 - 10:35 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng mu_2018.png r1 manage 59.4 K 2022-05-10 - 11:20 StefioYosseAndrean  
Unknown file formateps s_2017.eps r1 manage 50.2 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf s_2017.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PNGpng s_2017.png r1 manage 67.1 K 2022-08-19 - 10:29 StefioYosseAndrean  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_lowmu.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.0 K 2020-11-25 - 02:09 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_lowmu.png r3 r2 r1 manage 95.1 K 2020-11-25 - 20:43 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_pileup.pdf r1 manage 18.5 K 2020-11-25 - 02:40 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_eta_pileup.png r2 r1 manage 109.7 K 2020-11-25 - 20:45 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_mu_avg_pileup.pdf r1 manage 19.8 K 2020-11-25 - 02:40 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_mu_avg_pileup.png r2 r1 manage 124.4 K 2020-11-25 - 20:45 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_lowmu.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.9 K 2020-11-25 - 02:17 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_lowmu.png r3 r2 r1 manage 110.6 K 2020-11-25 - 20:46 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_pileup.pdf r1 manage 18.4 K 2020-11-25 - 02:38 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_p_pileup.png r2 r1 manage 131.9 K 2020-11-25 - 20:46 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_lowmu.pdf r1 manage 19.8 K 2021-03-01 - 23:30 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_lowmu.png r1 manage 100.5 K 2021-03-01 - 23:30 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_pileup.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2020-11-25 - 02:38 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_avgeop_vs_phi_pileup.png r2 r1 manage 123.7 K 2020-11-25 - 20:47 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_eop_lowmu.pdf r2 r1 manage 24.9 K 2020-11-25 - 02:27 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_eop_lowmu.png r3 r2 r1 manage 126.4 K 2020-11-25 - 20:47 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_eop_lowmu_logy.pdf r2 r1 manage 26.1 K 2020-11-25 - 02:24 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_eop_lowmu_logy.png r3 r2 r1 manage 136.3 K 2020-11-25 - 20:48 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_eop_pileup.pdf r1 manage 25.6 K 2020-11-25 - 02:38 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_eop_pileup.png r2 r1 manage 131.6 K 2020-11-25 - 20:48 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf tile_2015_eop_pileup_logy.pdf r1 manage 26.9 K 2020-11-25 - 02:38 JoakimOlsson  
PNGpng tile_2015_eop_pileup_logy.png r2 r1 manage 140.8 K 2020-11-25 - 20:48 JoakimOlsson  
PDFpdf timeBarrels.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2016-08-17 - 19:31 PawelKlimek  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r14 < r13 < r12 < r11 < r10 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r14 - 2022-08-19 - StefioYosseAndrean
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    Atlas All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback