# EgammaTriggerCSCPlots

Caption: \lone\ rate for single e/$\gamma$ triggers for a luminosity of \lum \begL. The open correspond to non-isolated triggers. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: \lone\ rate for double e/$\gamma$ triggers for a luminosity of \lum \begL. The open correspond to non-isolated triggers. Errors are statistical only

Caption: Ratio of trigger efficiencies for single electrons reconstruction in misaligned and ideal detector geometry as a function of true electron $|\eta|$ for the e10 menu item. Events in the $|\eta|$ plot are required to verify \et\ $>15$ \gev. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Ratio of trigger efficiencies for single electrons reconstruction in misaligned and ideal detector geometry as a function of true electron \et\ for the e10 menu item. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron $|\eta|$ e10 menu item. The efficiency is obtained from the following \MC\ simulated sample: single electrons simulated with ideal detector geometry for e10. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the medium set of offline electron cuts for e10 For trigger efficiency versus $|\eta|$ plots, an \et\ cut according to the corresponding menu item has been applied: for e10 \et\ $>15$ \gev, Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger robustness against inactive material.] {Effect of additional inactive material in the detector on the electron trigger efficiency. The trigger efficiency is compared for the nominal material distribution (at $\phi<0$) and for increased inactive material (at $\phi>0$) for the electron triggers e15i. The efficiency is plotted as a function of $\abseta$ of the electron candidate reconstructed offline. The left histograms correspond to the e15i trigger only. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron $|\eta|$ for e20 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: single electrons simulated with ideal detector geometry for e20. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline electron cuts for e20. For trigger efficiency versus $|\eta|$ plots, an \et\ cut according to the corresponding menu item has been applied: for e20 \et\ $>30$ \gev Errors are statistical only.}

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron |\et| for e20 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: single electrons simulated with ideal detector geometry for e20. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline electron cuts for e20. Errors are statistical only.}

Caption: {Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of true electron \etfor the e22i menu item. The efficiencies are obtained for single electrons using ideal detector geometry and are normalized with respect to loose set of offline electron cuts. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Selection variables for cluster-track match.] { \ef\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. the difference in $\eta$ between the cluster and track (extrapolated to calorimeter) position. Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: Selection variables for cluster-track match. \ef\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. the difference in $\phi$ between the cluster and track (extrapolated to calorimeter) position. Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: Selection variables for cluster-track match. \ef\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. Ratio of the \et\ of the EM cluster and the \pt\ of the reconstructed tracks Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: \lone\ isolation variables for single electrons with an \et\ between 7 and 80 GeV with a flat distribution (solid line, hatched histogram). In comparison, background candidates from the \et $> 17$~GeV dijet sample are shown (dashed line, hollow histogram). For the background, only clusters that do not match to a true electron within a \deltarcone of 0.1 are considered. The distributions for electromagnetic isolation is shown.

Caption: \lone\ isolation variables for single electrons with an \et\ between 7 and 80 GeV with a flat distribution (solid line, hatched histogram). In comparison, background candidates from the \et $> 17$~GeV dijet sample are shown (dashed line, hollow histogram). For the background, only clusters that do not match to a true electron within a \deltarcone of 0.1 are considered. The distributions for hadronic core energy is shown.

Caption: \lone\ isolation variables for single electrons with an \et\ between 7 and 80 GeV with a flat distribution (solid line, hatched histogram). In comparison, background candidates from the \et $> 17$~GeV dijet sample are shown (dashed line, hollow histogram). For the background, only clusters that do not match to a true electron within a \deltarcone of 0.1 are considered. Distributions for hadronic isolation.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster-track match.] \ltwo\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. Ratio of the \et\ of the EM cluster and the \pt\ of the reconstructed tracks. Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster-track match.] \ltwo\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. The difference in $\eta$ (left) between the cluster and track (extrapolated to calorimeter) position. Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster-track match.] \ltwo\ electron selection variables based on the combined calorimeter and inner detector information. The difference in $\phi$ between the cluster and track (extrapolated to calorimeter) position. Distributions are shown for signal (solid line, hatched histogram) and background (dashed line, hollow histogram). The reconstructed electrons come from a $7<E_{T}<80$~GeV sample. The background candidates come from a filtered dijet simulated sample, only candidates with no match to a truth electron within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 rad are selected.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon $|\eta|$ for the $\gamma 20$ trigger. The efficiencies are obtained for single photons simulated with ideal detector geometry and are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline photon cuts. Note, the $|\eta|$ plot includes an additional cut of $\et\ > 23$ \gev. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon Et for the $\gamma 20$ trigger. The efficiencies are obtained for single photons simulated with ideal detector geometry and are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline photon cuts. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon $|\eta|$ for the $\gamma 55$ trigger. The efficiencies are normalized with respect to photons with $\et\ >55$ \gev passing the loose set of offline photon cuts. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon Et for the $\gamma 55$ trigger. The efficiencies are normalized with respect to photons with $\et\ >55$ \gev passing the loose set of offline photon cuts. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon $|\eta|$ for the $\gamma 20$ trigger. The efficiencies are obtained for single photons simulated with ideal detector geometry and are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline photon cuts. Note, the $|\eta|$ plot includes an additional cut of $\et\ > 23$ \gev. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\/, \ltwo\ and EF as a function of the generated photon Et for the $\gamma 20$ trigger. The efficiencies are obtained for single photons simulated with ideal detector geometry and are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline photon cuts. Note, the $|\eta|$ plot includes an additional cut of $\et\ > 23$ \gev. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron Et for e10 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: single electrons simulated with ideal detector geometry. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the medium set of offline electron cuts for e10. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: \lone\ calorimeter trigger schema, showing how trigger towers (each spanning a $0.1 \times 0.1$ $\eta \times \phi$ region) are used to determine the energy for the electromagnetic cluster as well as for the electromagnetic isolation, hadronic core and hadronic isolation.

Caption: \lone\ calorimeter trigger schema, showing how trigger towers (each spanning a $0.1 \times 0.1$ $\eta \times \phi$ region) are used to determine the energy for the electromagnetic cluster as well as for the electromagnetic isolation, hadronic core and hadronic isolation.

Caption: Trigger efficiency dependency on the offline electron identification. Trigger efficiency for the e15i signature is determined with respect to loose, medium and tight offline electron identification selection (described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}). Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron $|\eta|$ for the e5 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: $J/\psi\rightarrow ee$ decays simulated with misaligned detector geometry for e5 trigger item. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the medium set of offline soft-electron cuts for e5. For trigger efficiency versus $|\eta|$ plots, an \et\ cut according to the corresponding menu item has been applied: for e5 \et\ $>10$ \gev. For e5 trigger item no data is shown for electrons for $|\eta|>2$ as this is beyond the coverage of the transition radiation tracker whose information is used for the offline electron selection. Errors are statistical only.

*Caption:*Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron Et for the e5 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: $J/\psi\rightarrow ee$ decays simulated with misaligned detector geometry for e5 trigger item. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the medium set of offline soft-electron cuts for e5. For e5 trigger item no data is shown for electrons for $|\eta|>2$ as this is beyond the coverage of the transition radiation tracker whose information is used for the offline electron selection. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: [Trigger robustness against inactive material.] {Effect of additional inactive material in the detector on the electron trigger efficiency. The trigger efficiency is compared for the nominal material distribution (at $\phi<0$) and for increased inactive material (at $\phi>0$) for the electron triggers e10 and e15i. The efficiency is plotted as a function of Et of the electron candidate reconstructed offline. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster.] Selection variables for a \ltwo\ calorimeter energy cluster. The distributions are shown for signal candidates from a simulated $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ sample (dashed line) and for dijet background candidates that do not have a photon or electron matched within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 and that have at least 1 jet with \et $> 17$ \GeV\ (black solid line). Both distributions have been normalized to unity. The plot shows the transverse energy of the EM cluster.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster.] Selection variables for a \ltwo\ calorimeter energy cluster. The distributions are shown for signal candidates from a simulated $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ sample (dashed line) and for dijet background candidates that do not have a photon or electron matched within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 and that have at least 1 jet with \et $> 17$ \GeV\ (black solid line). Both distributions have been normalized to unity. The plot shows the transverse energy deposited in the first layer of the hadronic calorimeter.

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster.] Selection variables for a \ltwo\ calorimeter energy cluster. The distributions are shown for signal candidates from a simulated $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ sample (dashed line) and for dijet background candidates that do not have a photon or electron matched within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 and that have at least 1 jet with \et $> 17$ \GeV\ (black solid line). Both distributions have been normalized to unity. The plot shows the shower shape in the $\eta$ direction in the second EM sampling ($R_{core}$)

Caption: [Selection variables for \ltwo\ cluster.] Selection variables for a \ltwo\ calorimeter energy cluster. The distributions are shown for signal candidates from a simulated $H \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ sample (dashed line) and for dijet background candidates that do not have a photon or electron matched within a \deltar\ cone of 0.1 and that have at least 1 jet with \et $> 17$ \GeV\ (black solid line). Both distributions have been normalized to unity. The plot shows the ratio between the difference of the first and second energy maximum and their addition ($R_{strips}$).

Caption: [Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the item e20.] {Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the e20 trigger signature. The efficiencies are shown \wrt\ a tight offline electron selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed $\eta$. The \tandp\ method (points) is compared with the \mctruth method (solid line) for all three trigger levels, \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open triangles), and the EF (solid squares). The number of $Z \to ee$ events used corresponds to 100\pb.

Caption: [Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the item e20.] {Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the e20 trigger signature. The efficiencies are shown \wrt\ a tight offline electron selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed Et. The \tandp\ method (points) is compared with the \mctruth method (solid line) for all three trigger levels, \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open triangles), and the EF (solid squares). The number of $Z \to ee$ events used corresponds to 100\pb.

Caption: [Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the item e20.] {Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the e20 trigger signature. The efficiencies are shown \wrt\ a tight offline electron selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}. The fractional efficiency difference (see Eq.~\ref{eq::TagAndProbe:FracEffDiff}) between the \tandp\ and \mctruth\ as a function of reconstructed eta is shown. The number of $Z \to ee$ events used corresponds to 100\pb.

Caption: [Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the item e20.] {Trigger efficiency from the \tandp\ method with $Z \to ee$ for the e20 trigger signature. The efficiencies are shown \wrt\ a tight offline electron selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}. The fractional efficiency difference (see Eq.~\ref{eq::TagAndProbe:FracEffDiff}) between the \tandp\ and \mctruth\ as a function of reconstructed Et is shown. The number of $Z \to ee$ events used corresponds to 100\pb.

Caption: Single object tag and probe efficiencies for the e10 selection of the 2e10 trigger signature. The efficiencies shown are relative to a tight offline electron identification selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed $\eta$. The plot shows the fractional efficiency difference (see Equation~\ref{eq::TagAndProbe:FracEffDiff}) between the two. The number of events used corresponds to 50~\ipb. For this figure, the invariant mass cut is $70<\mass{\mathrm{e}}<100~\gev$. Errors are statistical only. A signal sample of \zee\ \MC\ simulation without background was used to obtain these results.

Caption: Single object tag and probe efficiencies for the e10 selection of the 2e10 trigger signature. The efficiencies shown are relative to a tight offline electron identification selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed Et. The plot shows the fractional efficiency difference (see Equation~\ref{eq::TagAndProbe:FracEffDiff}) between the two. The number of events used corresponds to 50~\ipb. For this figure, the invariant mass cut is $70<\mass{\mathrm{e}}<100~\gev$. Errors are statistical only. A signal sample of \zee\ \MC\ simulation without background was used to obtain these results.

Caption: Single object tag and probe efficiencies for the e10 selection of the 2e10 trigger signature. The efficiencies shown are relative to a tight offline electron identification selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed $\eta$. The tag and probe method (points) is compared to MC truth (lines). The number of events used corresponds to 50~\ipb. For this figure, the invariant mass cut is $70<\mass{\mathrm{e}}<100~\gev$. Errors are statistical only. A signal sample of \zee\ \MC\ simulation without background was used to obtain these results.

Caption: Single object tag and probe efficiencies for the e10 selection of the 2e10 trigger signature. The efficiencies shown are relative to a tight offline electron identification selection as described in \protect\cite{CSC-EG-01}, as a function of the reconstructed Et. The tag and probe method (points) is compared to MC truth (lines). The number of events used corresponds to 50~\ipb. For this figure, the invariant mass cut is $70<\mass{\mathrm{e}}<100~\gev$. Errors are statistical only. A signal sample of \zee\ \MC\ simulation without background was used to obtain these results.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron $|\eta|$ for the e105 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: \zprimeee\ (1\TeV ) for e105. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline electron cuts. For trigger efficiency versus $|\eta|$ plots, an \et\ cut according to the corresponding menu item has been applied: for e105 \et\ $>130$ \gev. Errors are statistical only.

Caption: Trigger efficiencies at \lone\ (solid circles), \ltwo\ (open squares) and EF (solid triangles) as a function of true electron Et for the e105 menu item. The efficiencies are obtained from the following \MC\ simulated samples: \zprimeee\ (1\TeV ) for e105. Trigger efficiencies are normalized with respect to the loose set of offline electron cuts. Errors are statistical only.

-- TeresaFonsecaMartin - 11 Jun 2009

Responsible: TeresaFonsecaMartin
Last reviewed by: Never reviewed

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
eps 1eL1rate-csc.eps r1 manage 16.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:40 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png 1eL1rate-csc.png r1 manage 8.3 K 2009-06-11 - 15:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps 2eL1rate-csc.eps r1 manage 12.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:40 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png 2eL1rate-csc.png r1 manage 7.1 K 2009-06-11 - 15:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_EF_TrackMatch_EoverP_CBNT.eps r1 manage 21.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:44 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_EF_TrackMatch_EoverP_CBNT.png r1 manage 10.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:13 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_EF_TrackMatch_deta_CBNT.eps r1 manage 19.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:42 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_EF_TrackMatch_deta_CBNT.png r1 manage 9.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:13 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_EF_TrackMatch_dphi_CBNT.eps r1 manage 18.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:43 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_EF_TrackMatch_dphi_CBNT.png r1 manage 9.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:13 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L1_EmIsol-log.eps r1 manage 24.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:44 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L1_EmIsol-log.png r1 manage 11.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:14 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L1_HdCore-log.eps r1 manage 30.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:44 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L1_HdCore-log.png r1 manage 13.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:14 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L1_HdIsol-log.eps r1 manage 27.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:45 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L1_HdIsol-log.png r1 manage 16.1 K 2009-06-11 - 17:14 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L2_EtOverPt.eps r1 manage 20.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:45 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L2_EtOverPt.png r1 manage 10.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:17 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L2_trkClusDeta.eps r1 manage 19.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:46 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L2_trkClusDeta.png r1 manage 11.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:18 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps El_L2_trkClusDphi.eps r1 manage 18.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:46 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png El_L2_trkClusDphi.png r1 manage 9.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:23 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps L1CartoonIsolation.eps r1 manage 72.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:50 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png L1CartoonIsolation.png r1 manage 7.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:27 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps L1CartoonTowers.eps r1 manage 121.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:50 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png L1CartoonTowers.png r1 manage 16.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:27 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps T2Calo_Et_distributions.eps r1 manage 9.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:52 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png T2Calo_Et_distributions.png r1 manage 5.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:29 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps T2Calo_HdEt_distributions_01.eps r1 manage 13.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:52 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png T2Calo_HdEt_distributions_01.png r1 manage 7.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:32 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps T2Calo_Rshape_distributions.eps r1 manage 11.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:53 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png T2Calo_Rshape_distributions.png r1 manage 4.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:31 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps T2Calo_Rstrips_distributions_01.eps r1 manage 13.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:53 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png T2Calo_Rstrips_distributions_01.png r1 manage 5.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:32 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps TAP_ET_e10_tight.eps r1 manage 18.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:56 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png TAP_ET_e10_tight.png r1 manage 5.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:35 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps TAP_Eta_e10_tight.eps r1 manage 24.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:55 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png TAP_Eta_e10_tight.png r1 manage 6.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:35 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps TAPdiff_ET_e10_tight.eps r1 manage 29.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:55 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png TAPdiff_ET_e10_tight.png r1 manage 7.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:34 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps TAPdiff_Eta_e10_tight.eps r1 manage 38.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png TAPdiff_Eta_e10_tight.png r1 manage 8.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:34 TeresaFonsecaMartin
log TWiki.log r1 manage 9.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:57 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps Zprime-e105_El_T_E_T_L1L2EF.eps r1 manage 19.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:57 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png Zprime-e105_El_T_E_T_L1L2EF.png r1 manage 6.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:36 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps Zprime-e105_El_T_absEta_L1L2EF.eps r1 manage 18.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:57 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png Zprime-e105_El_T_absEta_L1L2EF.png r1 manage 5.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:36 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e10-ratio-mvsi-et.eps r1 manage 12.6 K 2009-06-11 - 18:00 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e10-ratio-mvsi-et.png r1 manage 6.2 K 2009-06-11 - 15:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e10-ratio-mvsi-eta.eps r1 manage 11.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:40 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e10-ratio-mvsi-eta.png r1 manage 5.9 K 2009-06-11 - 15:55 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e10tight-eta.eps r1 manage 13.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:41 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e10tight-eta.png r1 manage 5.5 K 2009-06-11 - 15:59 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e15i_eta_material.eps r1 manage 12.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:41 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e15i_eta_material.png r1 manage 5.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:11 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e20-et.eps r1 manage 13.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:41 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e20-et.png r1 manage 5.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:12 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e20-eta.eps r1 manage 13.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:41 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e20-eta.png r1 manage 5.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:12 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps e22i-et-noeop.eps r1 manage 13.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:43 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png e22i-et-noeop.png r1 manage 6.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:12 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g20ietar13.eps r1 manage 16.1 K 2009-06-11 - 17:47 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g20ietar13.png r1 manage 5.7 K 2009-06-11 - 17:24 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g20ipTr13.eps r1 manage 15.9 K 2009-06-11 - 17:48 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g20ipTr13.png r1 manage 5.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:25 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g60etar13.eps r1 manage 17.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:48 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g60etar13.png r1 manage 5.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:25 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g60pTr13.eps r1 manage 15.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:49 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g60pTr13.png r1 manage 6.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:26 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g7-80_g20.1031.EffVsEt.wrtTruth.eps r1 manage 29.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:47 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g7-80_g20.1031.EffVsEt.wrtTruth.png r1 manage 4.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:23 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps g7-80_g20.1031.EffVsEta.eps r1 manage 14.3 K 2009-06-11 - 17:47 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png g7-80_g20.1031.EffVsEta.png r1 manage 4.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:24 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps ie10e-et.eps r1 manage 14.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:50 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png ie10e-et.png r1 manage 5.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:26 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps looseMediumTightEt.eps r1 manage 16.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:51 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png looseMediumTightEt.png r1 manage 7.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:27 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps me5-et.eps r1 manage 17.6 K 2009-06-11 - 17:51 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png me5-et.png r1 manage 6.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:28 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps me5-eta.eps r1 manage 15.2 K 2009-06-11 - 17:52 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png me5-eta.png r1 manage 8.1 K 2009-06-11 - 17:28 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps pt_material.eps r1 manage 17.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:52 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png pt_material.png r1 manage 6.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:28 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps tandp_e20_L1L2EF_eta.eps r1 manage 30.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:53 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png tandp_e20_L1L2EF_eta.png r1 manage 6.8 K 2009-06-11 - 17:32 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps tandp_e20_L1L2EF_pT.eps r1 manage 25.4 K 2009-06-11 - 17:53 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png tandp_e20_L1L2EF_pT.png r1 manage 6.1 K 2009-06-11 - 17:33 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps tandp_e20_TandPoverTruth_eta.eps r1 manage 41.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png tandp_e20_TandPoverTruth_eta.png r1 manage 9.0 K 2009-06-11 - 17:33 TeresaFonsecaMartin
eps tandp_e20_TandPoverTruth_pT.eps r1 manage 40.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:54 TeresaFonsecaMartin
png tandp_e20_TandPoverTruth_pT.png r1 manage 9.5 K 2009-06-11 - 17:33 TeresaFonsecaMartin
Topic revision: r6 - 2010-12-06 - ElmarRitsch

 Account
 Cern Search TWiki Search Google Search Atlas All webs
Copyright &© 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback