This page contains plots related to the HighGranularity Timing Detector project part of the ATLAS PhaseII upgrade, to be used by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events.
Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible HGTD project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions.
Trigger efficiency as a function of the charge for all 15 channels of one transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier column (n°9), showing the minimum charge detectable by ALTIROC2 ASIC alone irradiated up to 220 Mrad for transimpedance preamplifier channels : 1.4 fC (median at 50%) Setup : Only analog frontend from all 15 channels of one transimpedance preamplifier column n°9 (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) turned on and all pixels in column fired simultaneoulsy 
Trigger efficiency for all transimpedance (TZ) channels (105 pixels or 7 columns), showing the minimum charge detectable by the ALTIROC2 ASIC alone irradiated up to 220 Mrad for transimpedance preamplifier channels : 3.1 fC (median at 50%) Setup : All analog frontends enabled (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) and transimpedance preamplifier pixels fired simultaneoulsy columnbycolumn. 
Trigger efficiency as a function of the charge for all 15 channels of one transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier column (n°9), showing the minimum charge detectable by ALTIROC2 ASIC alone irradiated up to 220 Mrad for transimpedance preamplifier channels : 1.4 fC (median at 50%) Setup : Only analog frontend from all 15 channels of one transimpedance preamplifier column n°9 (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) turned on and all pixels in column fired simultaneoulsy 
Trigger efficiency plot for all transimpedance (TZ) channels (105 pixels, 7 columns), showing the minimum charge detectable by the ALTIROC2 ASIC bump bonded onto an HPK LGAD biased at 80V : 3.8 fC (median at 50%) Setup : All transimpedance preamplifier analog frontends enabled (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) and transimpedance preamplifier pixels fired simultaneoulsy columnbycolumn. 
Time of Arrival (TOA) as a function of the injected charge for all transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier channels with ALTIROC2 ASIC bump bonded onto an HPK LGAD biased at 80 V. Setup: All transimpedance preamplifier analog frontends enabled (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) and pixels fired simultaneoulsy columnbycolumn. Pixel local thresholds aligned at 3.2 fC. Outliers positions within the pixel matrix do not follow any logic (for instance: red=channel 217=middle of column, purple=channel 201=middle of column, black=channel 210=bottom). No column tendency can be observed. Dispersions result from clock tree skews after digital place and route tool. 
Time Over Threshold (TOT) as a function of the injected charge for all transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier channels with ALTIROC2 ASIC bump bonded onto an HPK LGAD biased at 80 V. Setup : All transimpedance preamplifier analog frontends enabled (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) and pixels fired simultaneoulsy columnbycolumn. Pixel local thresholds aligned at 3.2 fC. 
Timewalk: Time Of Arrival (TOA) versus Time Over Threshold (TOT) for various charge and for all transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier channels with ALTIROC2 ASIC bump bonded onto an HPK LGAD biased at 80 V. Setup: All transimpedance preamplifier analog frontends enabled (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) and pixels fired simultaneoulsy columnbycolumn. Pixel local thresholds aligned at 3.2 fC.Outliers positions within the pixel matrix do not follow any logic (for instance: red=channel 217=middle of column, purple=channel 201=middle of column, black=channel 210=bottom). No column tendency can be observed. Dispersions result from clock tree skews after digital place and route tool. 
Jitter as function of charge with ALTIROC2 ASIC alone and ASIC+LGAD with at least all transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier channels enabled. The expectation from analog frontend simulations is also displayed as calculated with the preamplifier output noise, slope and amplitude. Discrepancies at low charge, near the threshold are still under investigation when more than one column is enabled. Pixel selected : bestof pixel minimizing jitter on average above 4 fC 
Mean jitter across transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier channels as function of charge with ALTIROC2 ASIC alone with all transimpedance preamplifier channels enabled and for various global discriminator alignments at various charges. Rising jitter close to the charge used for threshold alignment is caused by the lower pulse slope on top of the pulse. This effect has been reproduced with analogue frontend montecarlo simulations (including discriminator) as displayed on the figure. 
Time Of Arrival (TOA) TDC quantification step as a function of pixel numbers at two temperatures for ALTIROC2. The variation along the column has been attributed to static voltage drops which will be corrected in the next prototype. Also the TDC resolution shown here is not compensated in temperature since Delay Lock Loop (DLL) were not used in this measurement. This measurement is performed by a direct injection at the TDC input inside the ASIC. 
Time Of Arrival (TOA) TDC quantification step as a function of pixel numbers at two temperatures for ALTIROC2. The variation along the column has been attributed to static voltage drops which will be corrected in the next prototype. Also the TDC resolution shown here is not compensated in temperature since Delay Lock Loop (DLL) were not used in this measurement. This measurement is performed by a direct injection at the TDC input inside the ASIC. 
Time Over Threshold (TOT) TDC quantification step as a function of pixel numbers at two temperatures for ALTIROC2. The variation along the column has been attributed to static voltage drops which will be corrected in the next prototype. Also the TDC resolution shown here is not compensated in temperature since Delay Lock Loop (DLL) were not used in this measurement. This measurement is performed by a direct injection at the TDC input inside the ASIC. 
Time Over Threshold (TOT) TDC quantification step as a function of pixel numbers at two temperatures for ALTIROC2. The variation along the column has been attributed to static voltage drops which will be corrected in the next prototype. Also the TDC resolution shown here is not compensated in temperature since Delay Lock Loop (DLL) were not used in this measurement. This measurement is performed by a direct injection at the TDC input inside the ASIC. 
Mean Time Of Arrival (TOA) jitter (for 15 transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier + 15 voltage preamplifier pixels) for 4 and 10 fC injected charges versus total ionizing dose for ALTIROC2 ASIC alone showing stability under radiation up to 220 Mrad. Setup : Delay Lock Loop (DLL) not used (straped) Pixels ON and injected : col7, col8 (one at a time) Dose rate : 3 Mrad/h Temperature : 22°C 
Comparing pulse reconstruction of a voltage preamplifier (pixel 45) between 2 boards : ALTIROC2 ASIC alone (with and without internal detector capacitance) versus ASIC+LGAD (without internal detector capacitance). Showing same falling edge decay time and pulse amplitude between blue and green, hence confirming the internal LGADlike capacitance corresponds indeed to 3.5 pF. Showing a slightly slowly leading edge with LGAD than with the ASIC internal emulation detector capacitance that could partially explain a larger jitter when the sensor is connect to the ASIC, still under investigation. 
Collected charge as a function of the bias voltage for different singlepad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (blue circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (green losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (violet stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. 
Collected charge as a function of the bias voltage for different single pad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (green circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (violet losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (red stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. 
Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for different singlepad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (blue circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (green losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (violet stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. Time resolution is derived from the distributions of CFD differences for all the combinations of DUTs and a reference device (SiPM) tested simultaneously and it is defined as the standard deviation of a Gaussian fit. A charge threshold of 2 fC is applied. The resolution of SiPM was ranging around 65 ps depending on the voltage applied. Uncertainties are calculated using error propagation. 
Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for different single pad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (green circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (violet losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (red stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. Time resolution is derived from the distributions of CFD differences for all the combinations of DUTs and a reference device (SiPM) tested simultaneously and it is defined as the standard deviation of a Gaussian fit. A charge threshold of 2 fC is applied. The resolution of SiPM was ranging around 65 ps depending on the voltage applied. Uncertainties are calculated using error propagation. 
Efficiency map of the sensor IHEPIMEv2W7Q2 (irradiated at 1.5×1015 neq/cm^2), where efficiency is defined as ratio of the reconstructed tracks with a hit in the sensor passing a 2 fC threshold on charge collection to all the reconstructed tracks penetrating the sensor area. Global efficiency of the sensor is then calculated from the ROI in the central area of the detector (inside the red 0.5×0.5 mm^2 square), while the area of the whole sensor is 1.3×1.3 mm^2. 
Efficiency, for a collected charge threshold of 2 fC, as a function of the bias voltage for different single pad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (blue circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (green losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (violet stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. 
Efficiency, for a collected charge threshold of 2 fC, as a function of the bias voltage for different singlepad sensors of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19 (green circles), USTCIMEv2.1W17 (violet losanges) and IHEPIMEv2W7 (red stars). Bias voltages were kept lower than the value required to operate the sensors. 
Collected charge for an unirradiated singlepad sensor of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: IHEPIMEv2W7Q2. 
Collected charge for an unirradiated singlepad sensor of a size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm^2: FBKUFSD3.2W19. 
Collected charge (left) and time resolution (right) of USTCIMEv2.1 at fluences of 0, 8E14, 2.5E15 n_eq/cm^2. This βscope test is performed at USTC. The target collected charge is 4 fC and time resolution of 50 ps. 
Comparison of measured interpad gap and nominal interpad gap. The nominal interpad gap is define as the distance between the edges of the gain layers of neighbouring pads. For unirradiated USTCIMEv2.1 sensors, the measured IP is larger than nominal one. For sensors with nominal IP3 (30 um) and IP5 (50 um), the measured IP is about 100 um. For sensors with nominal IP7 (70 um), the measured IP is about 130 um. 
Interpad gap vs bias voltage. The Yaxis is measured interpad gap from TCT test. The Xaxis is sensor’s bias voltage during laser TCT test. 
(Left) The response of the infrared laser as a function of the beam position measured with Particulars® scanning TCT. The wavelength of the laser is 1064 nm, and the beam spot size is about 10 um. (Right) The response as function of the x for fixed y = 0.4375 mm, fitted with error functions. The interpad gap size is defined as the distance between the two positions where the response is 50% of the plateau, determined from the fitted functions. 
An example of current voltage characteristics for all pads of a full size (15x15 pads) HGTD sensor coming from the latest IHEPIME run. The sensor fulfils all the required specifications of the current and breakdown voltage spread (left and middle plots). They have been produced in 8” wafer (right plot). 
Typical Single Event Burnout mark is shown in the right plot (2019 DESY testbeam with 5 GeV e). The reconstructed track in the SEB event pointed to the location of the burn mark (middle and right plot). All the reconstructed tracks distribution across the detector before SEB is shown in the left plot. 
Single Event Burnout voltage dependence on sensor thickness. The minimum VSEB at which SEB was observed after several 106 particles/pad for each thickness in 2021 HGTD EndOfLifetime Test beams is shown (manufacturerrun (type, testbeam)). About 80 sensors (singlepad, 2x2, 5x5 arrays) were tested. Note that 55 mm thick device survived at indicated voltage. The line fit to the points results in critical average electric field of 12.1 V/mm where SEB occurs. The safe zone of 11 V/mm where no SEB was ever observed is indicated in yellow. 
Collected charge (left) and time resolution (right) of LGADs from various vendors (vendorrunwafer) being considered for HGTD at a fluence of 2.5x1015 neq/cm2. The target collected charge is 4 fC and time resolution of 50 ps for the HGTD. Carbon enriched sensors (IHEPIMEv2W7Q2, FBKUFSC2.3W19, USTCIMEV2.0W16) show stable performance at much lower bias voltages than noncarbon enriched sensors. USTCIMEV2.0W16 performance before irradiation is however not adequate. 
Gain layer depletion voltage dependence on equivalent fluence of reactor neutrons for different investigated prototype sensors (producerrunwafer). The dashed lines are the acceptor removal model (exponential) fits to the data. 
Collected charge as a function of the bias voltage for different CNM sensors doped with Boron (squares), Boron plus Carbon (circles) and Gallium (stars). Singlepads (S) were tested before (black markers) and after irradiation (coloured markers). The fluence, known with a precision of 10%, is indicated in units of 10^14 neq/cm2 (1, 6 and 30) as well as the type of irradiation with neutrons (n) or protons (p). Measurements were performed at temperatures from 35°C to 24°C for irradiated sensors and at 20°C for unirradiated sensors. 
Collected charge as a function of the bias voltage for different HPK sensors type 3.1 and 3.2. Singlepads (S) and 2×2 arrays of pads (A), were tested before (full black markers) and after irradiation (coloured markers). Channel 0 (Ch0) and channel 1 (Ch1) refer to two tested pads of an array which show the same performance. The fluence, known with a precision of 10%, is indicated in units of 10^14 neq/cm2 (8, 10 and 15) as well as the type of irradiation with neutrons (n) or protons (p). Measurements were performed at temperatures from 47°C to 29°C for irradiated sensors and from 39°C to 32°C for unirradiated sensors. 
Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for different CNM sensors doped with Boron (squares), Boron plus Carbon (circles) and Gallium (stars). Singlepads (S) were tested before (black markers) and after irradiation (coloured markers). The fluence, known with a precision of 10%, is indicated in units of 10^14 neq/cm2 (1, 6 and 30) as well as the type of irradiation with neutrons (n) or protons (p). Measurements were performed at temperatures from 35°C to 24°C for irradiated sensors and at 20°C for unirradiated sensors. 
Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for different HPK sensors type 3.1 and 3.2. Singlepads (S) and 2×2 arrays of pads (A), were tested after irradiation (coloured markers). Channel 1 (Ch1) refers to the tested pad of an array. The fluence, known with a precision of 10%, is indicated in units of 10^14 neq/cm2 (8, 10 and 15) as well as the type of irradiation with neutrons (n) or protons (p). Measurements were performed at temperatures from 47°C to 29°C for irradiated sensors and from 39°C to 32°C for unirradiated sensors. 
Time resolution as a function of the collected charge for different CNM sensors doped with Boron (squares), Boron plus Carbon (circles) and Gallium (stars) and HPK sensors type 3.1 and 3.2. Singlepads (S) and 2×2 arrays of pads (A), were tested after irradiation (coloured markers). Channel 1 (Ch1) refers to the tested pad of an array. The fluence, known with a precision of 10%, is indicated in units of 10^14 neq/cm2 (1, 6, 8, 10, 15 and 30) as well as the type of irradiation with neutrons (n) or protons (p). Measurements were performed at temperatures from 47°C to 24°C. 
Collected charge as a function of the the bias voltage for different single pad sensors built by CNM from wafer W4, doped with Boron. Measurements were performed at 32°C for sensors irradiated with neutrons (at 1x10^14 neq/cm2 and 6x10^14 neq/cm2) or with protons (empty markers) at 1x10^14 neq/cm2 and at 20 °C for the unirradiated one. The fluences are provided with a precision of 10%. 
Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for different single pad sensors built by HPK. Sensors were irradiated with neutrons with different fluences. The time resolution is computed from hits in the pad center region. Measurements were performed at temperatures from 41°C to 30°C for sensors irradiated with neutrons (at 8x10^14 neq/cm2 and 1.5x10^15 neq/cm2). The fluences are provided with a precision of 10% 
Efficiency as a function of bias voltage for different single pad sensors built by CNM from wafer W6, doped with Gallium. Sensors were irradiated with neutrons (solid markers) or protons (empty markers) with different fluences. The efficiency is computed for a charge threshold of 2 fC and from hits in the pad center region (in 0.5x0.5mm^2 area). Measurements were performed at 30°C for sensors irradiated with neutrons (at 1x10^14 neq/cm2 and 3x10^15 neq/cm2) and with protons at 1x10^14 neq/cm2. The non irradiated sensor was tested at 32°C. The fluences are provided with a precision of 10%. 
Efficiency as a function of the threshold on the collected charge for different single pad sensors built by CNM from wafer W6, doped with Gallium. Sensors were irradiated with neutrons (solid markers) or protons (empty markers) with different fluences. The efficiency is computed from hits in the pad center region (in 0.5x0.5mm^2 area). Measurements were performed at 30°C for sensors irradiated with neutrons (at 1x10^14 neq/cm2 and 3x10^15 neq/cm2) and with protons at 1x10^14 neq/cm2. The non irradiated sensor was tested at 32°C. The fluences are provided with a precision of 10%. 
2D maps of efficiency for a single pad sensor built by CNM from wafer W5, doped with Boron with Carbonspray, and irradiated with protons at a fluence of 1\times10^{14}~n_{eq}/cm^{2} operated at 210 V and for a collected charge of 9.7 fC. The measurement was performed at 32°C. The fluence is known with a precision 10%. The efficiency is computed for a charge threshold of 2 fC. The averaged efficiency in the 0.5x0.5mm^2 center area is 99.8%. 
Average Time Of Arrival measurement with the TDC as a function of the programmable delay using the external trigger.  
Channel LSB divided by the averaged LSB as function of the channel number for one ASIC  
Efficiency measured as a function of the injected charge for an ASIC alone with Cd = 4 pF (purple) and with an ASIC bump bonded to a sensor (blue) measured with the calibration setup  
Jitter measured as a function of the injected charge for an ASIC alone with Cd = 4 pF (purple) and with an ASIC bump bonded to a sensor (blue) measured with the calibration setup with a Dirac signal as an input. The open circle shows the jitter for an LGAD input signal estimated from the calibration data and the simulation  
Timeoverthreshold measured as a function of the injected charge for an ASIC bump bonded to a sensor  
Preamplifer amplitude measured with the discriminator probe for three different charges as a function of the irradiation during high dose period. The dashed vertical line represents the maximal TID for HGTD. The step observed at 0.5 MGy is due to large temperature variations at the beginning of the measurements, which were subsequently controlled  
Relative jitter measured with the discriminator probe for a charge of 10.3 fC as a function of the irradiation during high dose period.The dashed vertical line represents the maximal TID for HGTD.  
Distribution of the TOA as a function of the TOT. The dots correspond to the mean value of the TOA distribution for a given TOT bin extracted from a Gaussian. The red line is a fit of the average TOA as a function of the TOT  
Distributions of the time difference between LGAD+ALTIROC and the Quartz+SiPM system before (red) and after (black) time walk correction together with Gaussian fits. The numbers are the fitted Gaussian widths where the time resolution of the Quartz+SiPM system has been substracted quadratically. 
V op as a function of fluence after irradiation for different LGAD types for neutron irradiation. The red horizontal line represents the maximum allowed voltage of 750 V as discussed in Section 5.5.7. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy).  
Vop as a function of fluence after irradiation for different LGAD types for proton irradiation. The red horizontal line represents the maximum allowed voltage of 750 V as discussed in Section 5.5.7. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy).  
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.2 (a) and at maximum fluence for all vendors (two representative sensors with different performance for HPK3.2 are shown) (b). The horizontal lines indicate the HGTD lower charge limit of 4 fC at all fluences. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy). Measurements were performed at −30 ◦ C except for the prerad measurement that was done at 20 ◦ C.  (a) pdf (b) pdf 
pdfIV curves of different types of HPK single pad prototype sensors. The measurements are taken with a single needle and the guard rings are grounded.  
Figures to show the uniformity of the HPK3.150 sensors. Distribution of LGAD leakage current at 200 V of 648 measured single pad sensors. Measured with an automatic probe station and guard ring floating.  
Figures to show the uniformity of the HPK3.150 sensors. Distribution of breakdown voltages of 648 measured single pad sensors. Measured with an automatic probe station and guard ring floating  
Distribution of VBD on an HPK3.250 5 × 5 pads array. The measurement is taken by a dedicate probe card with guard ring and neighbor pads grounded. 

CV (a) and 1/C 2 V (b) curves of different types of HPK prototype sensor. The measurement is taken by single needle on the single pads with guard ring grounded. 

Collected charge (a) and time resolution (b) of different types of HPK prototype sensor before irradiation as a function of bias voltage. The requirements of the HGTD project are indicated by the horizontal red lines. 

The inverse of capacitance square as a function of the biased voltage of NDL LGAD sensors.  
The doping profile of NDL LGAD sensors estimated from CV measurements.  
(a) Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for NDL #9 and BV170 before irradiation. (b) Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for NDL #10, NDL #9, BV170 after 1.02 ⇥ 1015neq/cm2 irradiation at 30 oC.  
(a) Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for NDL #9 and BV170 before irradiation. (b) Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for NDL #10, NDL #9, BV170 after 1.02 ⇥ 1015neq/cm2 irradiation at 30 oC.  
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK1.1 (active thickness 35 µm) and HPK3.2 (active thickness 50 µm). The horizontal line indicates the HGTD lower charge limit of 4 fC at all fluences. The HPK1.1 did not satisfy the charge requirement for highest fluence. Measurements were performed at 30◦C except for the prerad measurement that was done at 20◦C.  
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.2. The horizontal line indicates the HGTD lower charge limit of 4 fC at all fluences. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy). Measurements were performed at 30◦C except for the prerad measurement that was done at 20◦C.  
Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.2 sensors measured on custommade HGTDspecific readout boards. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy). The red line represents the maximum allowed time resolution (70 ps) in the lifetime of HGTD. Measurements were performed at 30◦C except for the prerad measurement that was done at 20◦C. 
Expected Si 1MeV neq radiation levels in HGTD, using Fluka simulations, as a function of the radius considering a replacement of the inner ring every 1000 fb^1 and the middle ring replaced at 2000 fb^1. For the radiation levels, the particle type is included and the contribution from charged hadrons is included in ’Others’. These curves included a factor of 1.5 to account for simulation uncertainty. Figures are based off original figures.  pdf 
LGAD (Low Gain Avalanche Diode) sensors have been exposed to 5 GeV electrons at DESY TB22 beam line in March and May 2019.
Module overlap scheme: Schematic drawing showing the overlap between the modules on the front and back of one cooling disk of the HGTD. The sensors overlap 20% at r > 320 mm, and 80% for r < 320 mm.  pdf, png 
Material distributions: Material distributions for the HGTD as a function of pseudorapidity , expressed in (a) radiation lengths and (b) nuclear interaction lengths . The material is broken down into various components of the HGTD. The moderator is situated completely behind the active detector but included here as it is located within the hermetic vessel of the HGTD.  pdf, png 
Material distributions: Material distributions for the HGTD as a function of pseudorapidity , expressed in (a) radiation lengths and (b) nuclear interaction lengths . The material is broken down into various components of the HGTD. The moderator is situated completely behind the active detector but included here as it is located within the hermetic vessel of the HGTD.  pdf, png 
Main HGTD design parameters  pdf, png 
Event display: Visualization of a simulated QCD dijet event showing HGTD hits and trajectories of charged particles. An angular slice has been removed, and volumes representing some ITk services and all services and supports of the HGTD are also removed to expose the individual modules.  pdf, png 
Module placement: The layout of individual HGTD modules is shown for the first cooling disk for (a) one quadrant without any rotation, and for (b) the full disk with the 15 degree rotation. The modules are laid out in the same way for the second cooling disk (not shown) which is rotated in the opposite direction to avoid noninstrumented gaps from overlapping for both disks.  pdf, png 
Module placement: The layout of individual HGTD modules is shown for the first cooling disk for (a) one quadrant without any rotation, and for (b) the full disk with the 15 degree rotation. The modules are laid out in the same way for the second cooling disk (not shown) which is rotated in the opposite direction to avoid noninstrumented gaps from overlapping for both disks.  pdf, png 
Timing resolution: The expected HGTD timing resolution (a) per hit and (b) per track as function of radius and $\eta$ after different amounts of delivered integrated luminosity at the HLLHC. The different curves show how the sensor timing resolution deteriorates due to radiation exposure. The scenarios shown here include a planned replacement of the modules at $R < 320$~mm after half of the HLLHC program. The intrinsic timing resolution of the sensors and the contribution from the readout electronics are both considered and are added in quadrature.  pdf, png 
Timing resolution: The expected HGTD timing resolution (a) per hit and (b) per track as function of radius and $\eta$ after different amounts of delivered integrated luminosity at the HLLHC. The different curves show how the sensor timing resolution deteriorates due to radiation exposure. The scenarios shown here include a planned replacement of the modules at $R < 320$~mm after half of the HLLHC program. The intrinsic timing resolution of the sensors and the contribution from the readout electronics are both considered and are added in quadrature.  pdf, png 
Occupancy: Hit occupancy as a function of the radius for a pixel size of 1.3 x 1.3 mm2 at a pileup of 200.  pdf, png 
Number of hits per track: The average number of hits as a function of the position in xy plane. The overlap between the active areas of the modules on the front and back of the cooling plates is 80% at r < 320 mm and 20% at larger radii..  png 
HGTD hit time distribution, before (red) and after (blue) the reference time, t_{0} , calibration procedure. The calibration constant is calculated every 1 ms from the mean of the smeared hit times of a grid of 15 by 15 sensors corresponding to one ASIC. The nominal hit time distribution is obtained from a Geant 4 simulation of the ATLAS Detector which includes the time resolution of the sensor and the time dispersion of the LHC collision. NonGaussian tails arise from late particles, backscatter, and other effects. Additional hit time smearing is applied to model the effects of clock jitter and time dispersion arising in the ASIC, flex cable, lpGBT, and FELIX. The expected systematic LHC RF variation time is added as an additional effect. Finally, a sinusoidally varying 100 ps offset of 20 ms period is added to model sources of time jitter that might arise from heat cycles or other effects.  pdf 
Hit time resolution, t_{smear}  t_{reco} after the t_{0} calibration procedure as a function of the variation period, and for several different choices of calibration window time, shown for R=150 mm. t_{reco} is the hit time taken from simulation and includes inherent hit time resolution effects from the sensor and electronics and the collision time spread. The t_{smear} term adds additional sources of time jitter from the ASIC, FELIX, flex cable, lpGBT, and ATLAS collision time drift, with an additional sinusoidally varying 100 ps offset of variable period. If no calibration is applied the time jitter is approximately 70ps and is shown as the dashed line. For a variation period of greater than 10 ms, and with the right choice of calibration window size, the calibration procedure will always improve the t_{0} precision.  pdf 
Hit time resolution, t_{smear}  t_{reco} after the t_{0} calibration procedure as a function of the variation period, and for several different choices of calibration window time, shown for R=350 mm. t_{reco} is the hit time taken from simulation and includes inherent hit time resolution effects from the sensor and electronics and the collision time spread. The t_{smear} term adds additional sources of time jitter from the ASIC, FELIX, flex cable, lpGBT, and ATLAS collision time drift, with an additional sinusoidally varying 100 ps offset of variable period. If no calibration is applied the time jitter is approximately 70ps and is shown as the dashed line. For a variation period of greater than 10 ms, and with the right choice of calibration window size, the calibration procedure will always improve the t_{0} precision.  pdf 
LGAD sensors of different vendors, geometries and types have been studied by HGTD institutes, including:
Microscope photo of an HPK3.150 15x15 array (partial view).  jpg 
IV measurement of 25 pads from an unirradiated HPK3.150 5x5 array without UBM measured with a 5x5 probe card at room temperature (all pads and GR grounded).  pdf 
Breakdown voltage 2D map of 15x15 array: 2D map of breakdown voltage of an HPK3.150 15x15 array (~2x2 cm2 large sensor) measured with an automatic probe station (i.e. scanning of each pad one after another).  pdf 
Time resolution vs. gain for two irradiated HPK LGADs of 50 and 30 um thicknesses with time walk correction applied.  pdf 
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.150 sensors. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers 70 MeV p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.250 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for FBKUFSD3C60 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Collected charge as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPKProto30 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 20 C and 27 C.  pdf 
Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.150 sensors. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers 70 MeV p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPK3.250 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for FBKUFSD3C60 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 30 C.  pdf 
Time resolution as a function of bias voltage for different fluences for HPKProto30 sensors after n irradiation (n). Measurements were performed at 20 C and 27 C.  pdf 
InterPad distances for several HPK3.150 sensors measured with a laser TCT system  pdf 
Hit efficiency as a function of collected charge. The curve includes the data of 16 individual sensors before and after irradiation, which all show a universal behaviour. The threshold to accept events with a hit was chosen at a measured noise occupancy of 0.1% and 0.01%, respectively. A hit efficiency above 99% is obtained for a charge larger than 2 fC.  pdf 
*The charge at Vmax and 95% of Vmax as a function of fluence for the different sensor types.*  pdf 
Leakage current for single pads at 30 C as a function of bias voltage for HPK3.150 irradiated with 1 MeV neutrons (solid lines) and 70 MeV protons (dashed lines). The dasheddotted horizontal line represents the ALTIROC maximum acceptable current of 5 uA.  pdf 
Collected charge vs bias voltage for sensors irradiated to 3E15 Neq cm2 and 6E15 Neq cm2, respectively. In the plots are measured data of the existing prototypes and the simulated prospect of the proposed sensors combining deep implantation of the Boron gain layer with carbon implantation.  pdf 
Collected charge vs bias voltage for sensors irradiated to 3E15 Neq cm2 and 6E15 Neq cm2, respectively. In the plots are measured data of the existing prototypes and the simulated prospect of the proposed sensors combining deep implantation of the Boron gain layer with carbon implantation.  pdf 
Time of arrival in a channel of an unirradiated 2x2 LGAD array bumpbonded on an ALTIROC0 ASIC as a function of the amplitude of the preamplifier probe. The profile of the 2D distribution (black points) and a polynomial fit (red line) are superimposed. The fit is used to correct for the time walk effect.   pdf 
Time resolution of a channel of an unirradiated 2x2 LGAD array bumpbonded on an ALTIROC0 ASIC as a function of the discriminator threshold (in DAC units) before and after time walk correction. A SiPM with a resolution of 40 ps is used as a time reference  it's contribution has been substracted. The amplitude of the preamplifier probe is used to correct for the time walk, resulting in a 30% improvement in the time resolution.   pdf 
*Jitter measured as a function of the injected charge for a Cd = 3.5 pF.. 

LGAD (Low Gain Avalanche Diode) sensors have been exposed to 120 GeV charged pions at CERN SPS H6 beam line in September 2017.
border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
Signal efficiency in an unirradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of the X and Y coordinates (in mm). The voltage threshold to select the signal is 3 times larger than the noise (~5mV). The efficiency in the bulk is larger than 99.8%.  eps  pdf 
Signal efficiency in an irradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of the X and Y coordinates (in mm). The voltage threshold to select the signal is 3 times larger than the noise (~5mV). The bottom right pad is not displayed due to a broken channel in the readout board. ). The efficiency in the bulk is larger than 99.8%.  eps  pdf 
Signal amplitude in the bulk of LGAD pads of size 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} in an array sensor. The dashed line shows the default threshold corresponding to 3 times the noise.  eps  pdf 
Signal efficiency in the bulk of LGAD pads of size 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} in an array sensor as a function of the voltage threshold. The dashed line shows the default threshold corresponding to 3 times the noise.  eps  pdf 
Signal efficiency in the interpad region for an unirradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of X (in mm) for 3 different voltage thresholds.  eps  pdf 
Signal efficiency in the interpad region for an irradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of X (in mm) for 3 different voltage thresholds.  eps  pdf 
Time resolution in an unirradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of the X and Y coordinates (in mm). The bottom left pad is not displayed because this channel was not plugged to the same oscilloscope as the quartz+SiPM used as a reference to estimate the time resolution (in this case, more sophisticated analysis technique would be required). The time resolution is larger in the guard rings around the pads where there is no multiplication of the charge. The fluctuations are dominated by statistical fluctuations since very small bins are used in order to show the structure around the pad.  eps  pdf 
Time resolution in an irradiated array of four LGAD sensors of 1.1 x 1.1 mm^{2} each, as a function of the X and Y coordinates (in mm). The bottom right pad is not displayed due to a broken channel in the readout board. The time resolution is larger in the guard rings around the pads where there is no multiplication of the charge.  eps  pdf 
LGAD (Low Gain Avalanche Diode) sensors have been exposed to 120 GeV charged pions at CERN SPS H6B beam line in August 2016 Sensor characteristics: * Two single pad LGAD produced by CNM through RD50 * 1.2 x 1.2 mm^{2} size (C=3.3 pF) * 45 μm thickness Readout : * Board designed and assembled at University of California Santa Cruz: first stage trans impedance preamplifier on printed circuit (R_{f} =470 Ohm) followed by a second stage broadband amplifier (gain 20 dB) * The data were read‐out by a oscilloscope with 40 GSample/s and a 2 GHz bandwidth. The setup was equipped with a 3x3x10 mm^{3} quartz read out by a SiPM to have a reference. Time resolution of reference is about 15‐17 ps
border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
Typical Pulse Shape: Typical pulse shape recorded with a LGAD sensor with 200 V bias voltage with 120 GeV pions. The charge is computed integrating the signal over the yellow area, taking into account the gain of the electronics readout (~95).  
Charge Distribution: Charge distribution for a LGAD biased with 150 V. A Landau convoluted by a Gaussian fit is superimposed.  
Charge as a Function of Bias Voltage: Most probable value of the charge as a function of the bias voltage for two LGAD sensors.  
Gain as a Function of Bias Voltage: Gain as a function of the bias voltage for two LGAD sensors. The gain is computed as the charge divided by 0.46 fC, which is the mean signal deposited by dE/dx in 45 μm of silicon when no amplification mechanism is present.  
Signal to Noise Ratio: Signal to noise ratio as a function of the bias voltage for two LGAD sensors. Signal is measured as the amplitude at the signal peak. The noise is computed as the rms of the baseline and does not take into account the increase of the Landau width due to the multiplication process in the LGAD.  
Time Resolution: Time resolution as a function of the bias voltage for two LGAD sensors. The time of each sensor is extracted at 20 % of the signal amplitude with a linear interpolation between the measurements. The time resolution is extracted from data in which the considered sensor was not used for triggering, by computing the rms of all time differences between the considered sensor, the reference quartz/!SiPM and the trigger sensor. The resulting equation system (under the assumption of uncorrelated resolutions) is solved o obtain the time resolution. of each device.  
Time Resolution: Time resolution as a function of the gain for two LGAD sensors. The time of each sensor is extracted at 20 % of the signal amplitude with a linear interpolation between the measurements. The time resolution is extracted from data in which the considered sensor was not used for triggering, by computing the rms of all time differences between the considered sensor, the reference quartz/!SiPM and the trigger sensor. The resulting equation system (under the assumption of uncorrelated resolutions) is solved o obtain the time resolution. of each device.  
Signal Rise Time: Signal rise time (computed between 20% and 80 % of the signal amplitude) as a function of the bias voltage for two LGAD Sensors of each device. 
I  Attachment  History  Action  Size  Date  Who  Comment 

0fC_vs_bias_.pdf  r1  manage  14.2 K  20200616  03:09  SimoneMicheleMazza  Figure 5.7: V op as a function of fluence after irradiation for different LGAD types for neutron (a) and proton (b) irradiation. The red horizontal line represents the maximum allowed voltage of 750 V as discussed in Section 5.5.7. Solid markers indicate n irradiation (n), open markers p irradiation at CYRIC (pCy).  
png  0fC_vs_bias_n1.png  r1  manage  56.7 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
0fC_vs_bias_n.pdf  r1  manage  14.3 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  0fC_vs_bias_p1.png  r1  manage  50.3 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
0fC_vs_bias_p.pdf  r1  manage  14.2 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028efficiencyallasic+LGAD.png  r2 r1  manage  204.6 K  20220919  00:02  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028efficiencyallasicalone.png  r1  manage  174.4 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028efficiencycolasic+LGAD.png  r1  manage  140.1 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028efficiencycolasicalone.png  r1  manage  125.5 K  20220918  23:34  MaximeMorenas  Trigger efficiency as a function of the charge for all 15 channels of one transimpedance (TZ) preamplifier column (n°9), showing the minimum charge detectable by ALTIROC2 ASIC alone irradiated up to 220 Mrad for transimpedance preamplifier channels : 1.4 fC (median at 50%) Setup : Only analog frontend from all 15 channels of one transimpedance preamplifier column n°9 (preamplifier+discriminator+TDC) turned on and all pixels in column fired simultaneoulsy 
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028jitterVSchargeASICaloneVSwithLGAD.png  r1  manage  160.2 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028jitterVSchargeThresAlignements.png  r1  manage  120.6 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028pulseReconstructionlgadVSalone.png  r1  manage  155.2 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028toaVScharge.png  r1  manage  225.8 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028toaVStot.png  r1  manage  189.5 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLCOMHGTD2022028totVScharge.png  r1  manage  158.3 K  20220918  23:44  MaximeMorenas  
png  ATLASHGTD20212022Charge_2.5e15.png  r1  manage  94.7 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLASHGTD20212022Efficiency_2.5e15.png  r1  manage  91.3 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLASHGTD20212022Resolution_2.5e15.png  r1  manage  93.3 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLASHGTD2022Charge_1.5e15.png  r1  manage  93.9 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLASHGTD2022Efficiency_1.5e15.png  r1  manage  91.1 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLASHGTD2022Resolution_1.5e15.png  r1  manage  92.0 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
png  ATLAS_HPK_5x5_SMPL_W8_P11_GRgnd1.png  r1  manage  85.1 K  20190506  23:24  SimoneMicheleMazza  IV of a 5x5 HPK 3.1 array with probe card 
ATLAS_HPK_5x5_SMPL_W8_P11_GRgnd.pdf  r1  manage  30.2 K  20190506  23:24  SimoneMicheleMazza  IV of a 5x5 HPK 3.1 array with probe card  
B24_ch3_120_reso.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20181130  15:29  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
png  B24_ch3_120_reso.png  r1  manage  47.8 K  20181130  15:29  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
eps  Beamspot.eps  r1  manage  182.1 K  20170705  17:31  DirkZerwas  
Beamspot.pdf  r1  manage  212.3 K  20170705  17:31  DirkZerwas  
png  Beamspot.png  r1  manage  32.7 K  20170705  17:31  DirkZerwas  
png  CCTiming.png  r1  manage  181.5 K  20220210  14:17  GregorKramberger  CC and time resolution of recent prototypes 
png  CC_WF_proposal_3E151.png  r1  manage  73.3 K  20190509  22:46  SimoneMicheleMazza  Simulated collected charge for deep B+C 
CC_WF_proposal_3E15.pdf  r1  manage  16.2 K  20190509  22:46  SimoneMicheleMazza  Simulated collected charge for deep B+C  
png  CC_WF_proposal_6E151.png  r1  manage  62.8 K  20190509  22:46  SimoneMicheleMazza  Simulated collected charge for deep B+C 
CC_WF_proposal_6E15.pdf  r1  manage  15.2 K  20190509  22:46  SimoneMicheleMazza  Simulated collected charge for deep B+C  
CNM_W6S1006_3e15n_charge_voltage_plot.pdf  r1  manage  7.6 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  CNM_W6S1006_3e15n_charge_voltage_plot.png  r1  manage  7.3 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
CNM_W6S1006_3e15n_timeresolution_charge_plot.pdf  r1  manage  7.7 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  CNM_W6S1006_3e15n_timeresolution_charge_plot.png  r1  manage  7.6 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
png  CURRENT_0fC_vs_bias_1001.png  r1  manage  62.1 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
CURRENT_0fC_vs_bias_100.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  CURRENT_0fC_vs_bias_951.png  r1  manage  60.8 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
CURRENT_0fC_vs_bias_95.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
eps  Charge_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.eps  r1  manage  9.9 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
Charge_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
png  Charge_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.png  r1  manage  16.3 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
eps  Charge_Trigger_LandauMpv.eps  r1  manage  12.5 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
Charge_Trigger_LandauMpv.pdf  r1  manage  15.9 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
png  Charge_Trigger_LandauMpv.png  r1  manage  17.7 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
png  Charge_vs_fluence1.png  r1  manage  71.1 K  20190509  22:51  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge vs fluence 
Charge_vs_fluence.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20190509  22:51  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge vs fluence  
eps  EffPUvsPT_fwdJets_fixedHS.eps  r1  manage  11.5 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
EffPUvsPT_fwdJets_fixedHS.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  EffPUvsPT_fwdJets_fixedHS.png  r1  manage  41.0 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  Effic_CNM1038effic2D).png  r1  manage  31.7 K  20210126  19:05  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
eps  ElectronIsolationZ0only.eps  r1  manage  10.8 K  20170927  13:52  DirkZerwas  
ElectronIsolationZ0only.pdf  r1  manage  14.9 K  20170927  13:52  DirkZerwas  
png  ElectronIsolationZ0only.png  r1  manage  12.1 K  20170927  13:52  DirkZerwas  
eps  Electrons_nCells.eps  r1  manage  79.7 K  20170705  18:02  DirkZerwas  
Electrons_nCells.pdf  r1  manage  34.5 K  20170705  18:02  DirkZerwas  
png  Electrons_nCells.png  r1  manage  104.4 K  20170705  18:02  DirkZerwas  
EventDisplay_CellsXYN_jet.pdf  r1  manage  97.8 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsXYN_jet.png  r1  manage  48.8 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsXYN_jet_mu0.pdf  r1  manage  69.6 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsXYN_jet_mu0.png  r1  manage  28.1 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsXYP_jet.pdf  r1  manage  114.9 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsXYP_jet.png  r1  manage  63.0 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsXYP_jet_mu0.pdf  r1  manage  70.3 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsXYP_jet_mu0.png  r1  manage  28.8 K  20161014  17:20  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsdT_core1_Jet1.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsdT_core1_Jet1.png  r1  manage  15.4 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsdT_core2_Jet1.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsdT_core2_Jet1.png  r1  manage  15.7 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
EventDisplay_CellsdT_jet_Jet1.pdf  r1  manage  15.4 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
png  EventDisplay_CellsdT_jet_Jet1.png  r1  manage  16.2 K  20161014  17:23  MartinAleksa  
png  FBK_CC1.png  r1  manage  61.4 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors 
FBK_CC.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors  
png  FBK_TimeRes1.png  r1  manage  61.3 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs 
FBK_TimeRes.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs  
FBK_TimeRes_lin.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale)  
png  FBK_TimeRes_lin.png  r1  manage  1215.0 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale) 
png  Fig10a_Plot_folder_HPK_prerad_Max_Plot_HPK2_bias_voltage_vs_charge1.png  r1  manage  93.2 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig10a_Plot_folder_HPK_prerad_Max_Plot_HPK2_bias_voltage_vs_charge.pdf  r1  manage  62.9 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig10b_Plot_folder_HPK_prerad_Max_Plot_HPK2_bias_voltage_vs_time_res1.png  r1  manage  88.1 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig10b_Plot_folder_HPK_prerad_Max_Plot_HPK2_bias_voltage_vs_time_res.pdf  r1  manage  62.5 K  20200516  01:40  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig3_HPKPrototypeSingleIVs1.png  r1  manage  120.2 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig3_HPKPrototypeSingleIVs.pdf  r1  manage  21.2 K  20200516  01:40  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig4a_Iat200VhistoHPKtype3p1Singles1.png  r1  manage  76.2 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig4a_Iat200VhistoHPKtype3p1Singles.pdf  r1  manage  19.6 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig4b_VBDhistoHPKtype3p1Singles1.png  r1  manage  76.8 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig4b_VBDhistoHPKtype3p1Singles.pdf  r1  manage  19.2 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig5_VBD_32_5x51.png  r1  manage  177.8 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig5_VBD_32_5x5.pdf  r1  manage  13.6 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig6a_CVL1.png  r1  manage  91.8 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig6a_CVL.pdf  r1  manage  25.0 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig6b_C2V_Log1.png  r1  manage  77.5 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig6b_C2V_Log.pdf  r1  manage  30.3 K  20200516  01:42  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig7a_type32_5x5_IV1C_Log1.png  r1  manage  98.6 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig7a_type32_5x5_IV1C_Log.pdf  r1  manage  30.6 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig7b_Jan04type32_5x5Run_02_C2V_Log1.png  r1  manage  70.9 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig7b_Jan04type32_5x5Run_02_C2V_Log.pdf  r1  manage  30.3 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig8a_VGLCV_32_5x51.png  r1  manage  185.1 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig8a_VGLCV_32_5x5.pdf  r1  manage  13.6 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig8b_VGLIV_32_5x51.png  r1  manage  203.7 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig8b_VGLIV_32_5x5.pdf  r1  manage  13.7 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig8c_Corr_VBD_VGLCV_32_5x51.png  r1  manage  58.8 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig8c_Corr_VBD_VGLCV_32_5x5.pdf  r1  manage  15.6 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig8d_Corr_VBD_VGLIV_32_5x51.png  r1  manage  58.7 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig8d_Corr_VBD_VGLIV_32_5x5.pdf  r1  manage  15.6 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Fig9b_Fit_distances_vendors_vv11.png  r1  manage  71.1 K  20200516  01:43  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fig9b_Fit_distances_vendors_vv1.pdf  r1  manage  89.0 K  20200516  01:41  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Fluencesensorplot3.pdf  r1  manage  21.5 K  20200507  14:21  StefanG  
eps  Gain_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.eps  r1  manage  10.0 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
Gain_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
png  Gain_Probe_LandauMpv_vs_biasVoltage.png  r1  manage  16.1 K  20161014  17:57  MartinAleksa  
eps  HGTD0v0.eps  r1  manage  163.6 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
HGTD0v0.pdf  r1  manage  30.3 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTD0v0.png  r1  manage  51.2 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
eps  HGTD3v1.eps  r1  manage  175.6 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
HGTD3v1.pdf  r1  manage  30.0 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTD3v1.png  r1  manage  56.6 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure1.pdf  r1  manage  458.7 K  20220614  14:52  GregorKramberger  Interpad measurements for USTCIMEV2.1 W19 sensor (IR laser)  
png  HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure1.png  r1  manage  317.0 K  20220614  15:07  GregorKramberger  
HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure2.pdf  r1  manage  455.3 K  20220614  14:53  GregorKramberger  IP distance dependance on bias votlage USTCIMEV2.1  
png  HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure2.png  r1  manage  134.5 K  20220614  15:10  GregorKramberger  
HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure3.pdf  r1  manage  444.4 K  20220614  14:55  GregorKramberger  Effective vs Nominal IP for USTCIMEV2.1 sensors  
png  HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure3.png  r2 r1  manage  134.5 K  20220614  15:22  GregorKramberger  
HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure4.pdf  r1  manage  612.8 K  20220614  14:56  GregorKramberger  Sr90 CC and timing results for irradiated USTCIMEV2.1 sensors  
png  HGTDSensorsApproval_plots_for_USTCIMEv2.1_Figure4.png  r1  manage  134.8 K  20220614  15:20  GregorKramberger  
HGTDSensorsJan2022Figure1.pdf  r1  manage  407.8 K  20220131  11:57  GregorKramberger  Gain layer depletion voltage dependence on neutron equivalent fluence for most of the prototypes studied.  
HGTDSensorsJan2022Figure2.pdf  r1  manage  499.7 K  20220131  12:00  GregorKramberger  Charge collection and timing properties of the recent prototypes irradiated to the equivalent fluence of 2.5e15 cm2.  
HGTDSensorsJan2022Figure3.pdf  r1  manage  320.1 K  20220131  12:02  GregorKramberger  SEB safe operation voltage determined from 202021 test beam measurements.  
HGTDSensorsJan2022Figure4.pdf  r1  manage  288.3 K  20220131  12:03  GregorKramberger  Example of SEB event in the 2019 DESY test beam.  
HGTDSensorsJan2022Figure5.pdf  r1  manage  550.8 K  20220131  12:05  GregorKramberger  IV of larger 15x15 sensor from IHEPIMEv2 production.  
eps  HGTDSiW.eps  r1  manage  15.9 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
HGTDSiW.pdf  r1  manage  18.9 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTDSiW.png  r1  manage  33.5 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
HGTDradplots.pdf  r1  manage  146.7 K  20161017  17:12  AnaHenriques  HGTDLGAD_rad_tolerance  
HGTD_radiationlevels.pdf  r1  manage  180.1 K  20161017  17:10  AnaHenriques  HGTD expected radiation levels  
eps  HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta0_3.6.eps  r1  manage  16.0 K  20170703  18:32  DirkZerwas  
HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta0_3.6.pdf  r1  manage  15.4 K  20170703  18:32  DirkZerwas  
png  HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta0_3.6.png  r1  manage  42.0 K  20170703  18:32  DirkZerwas  
eps  HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta2.6_3.6.eps  r2 r1  manage  15.9 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta2.6_3.6.pdf  r1  manage  15.8 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta2.6_3.6.pdf.pdf  r1  manage  62.3 K  20170613  10:37  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTD_trkIso_vs_density_time30_60_final_eta2.6_3.6.png  r2 r1  manage  64.6 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
eps  HGTDasu200x200V1.eps  r1  manage  59.8 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
HGTDasu200x200V1.pdf  r1  manage  21.5 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTDasu200x200V1.png  r1  manage  24.7 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
eps  HGTimingV7.eps  r1  manage  100.1 K  20161014  17:06  MartinAleksa  
HGTimingV7.pdf  r1  manage  39.7 K  20161014  17:07  MartinAleksa  
png  HGTimingV7.png  r1  manage  343.7 K  20161014  17:07  MartinAleksa  
jpg  HPK_15x15.jpg  r1  manage  212.5 K  20190430  21:36  SimoneMicheleMazza  Microscope photo of an HPK3.150 15x15 array 
png  HPK_30_CC1.png  r1  manage  69.8 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors 
HPK_30_CC.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors  
png  HPK_30_TimeRes1.png  r1  manage  67.1 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs 
HPK_30_TimeRes.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs  
HPK_30_TimeRes_lin.pdf  r1  manage  14.9 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale)  
png  HPK_30_TimeRes_lin.png  r1  manage  1215.0 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale) 
png  HPK_31_CC1.png  r1  manage  79.0 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors 
HPK_31_CC.pdf  r1  manage  16.3 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors  
png  HPK_31_TimeRes1.png  r1  manage  79.3 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs 
HPK_31_TimeRes.pdf  r1  manage  16.1 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs  
HPK_31_TimeRes_lin.pdf  r1  manage  16.4 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale)  
png  HPK_31_TimeRes_lin.png  r1  manage  1215.0 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale) 
png  HPK_32_CC1.png  r1  manage  62.8 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors 
HPK_32_CC.pdf  r1  manage  15.4 K  20190506  22:12  SimoneMicheleMazza  Collected charge for HGTD TDR studied sensors  
png  HPK_32_TimeRes1.png  r1  manage  66.3 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs 
HPK_32_TimeRes.pdf  r1  manage  15.2 K  20190509  22:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs  
HPK_32_TimeRes_lin.pdf  r1  manage  15.6 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale)  
png  HPK_32_TimeRes_lin.png  r1  manage  1215.0 K  20190514  01:07  SimoneMicheleMazza  Time resolution for HGTD LGADs (linear scale) 
eps  HSeffPU2_highpt_18.eps  r2 r1  manage  13.2 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
HSeffPU2_highpt_18.pdf  r2 r1  manage  15.5 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
png  HSeffPU2_highpt_18.png  r2 r1  manage  49.0 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
eps  HSeffPU2_lowpt_17.eps  r2 r1  manage  13.3 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
HSeffPU2_lowpt_17.pdf  r2 r1  manage  15.5 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
png  HSeffPU2_lowpt_17.png  r2 r1  manage  50.3 K  20170705  15:01  DirkZerwas  
png  IHEPIMEv215x15.png  r1  manage  621.7 K  20220210  14:29  GregorKramberger  IHEPIMEv215x15 
eps  IPZ.eps  r1  manage  13.0 K  20170929  19:24  ArielSchwartzman  
IPZ.pdf  r1  manage  19.1 K  20170929  19:23  ArielSchwartzman  
png  IPZ.png  r1  manage  35.0 K  20170929  19:24  ArielSchwartzman  
IrradAmp.pdf  r1  manage  22.0 K  20200529  14:53  MakovecNikola  
png  IrradAmp.png  r1  manage  25.6 K  20200529  14:53  MakovecNikola  
IrradJitter.pdf  r1  manage  22.2 K  20200529  14:53  MakovecNikola  
png  IrradJitter.png  r1  manage  29.6 K  20200529  14:53  MakovecNikola  
LumiRelativeStatErrorVsMu.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20180220  11:46  ChristianOhm  
png  LumiRelativeStatErrorVsMu.png  r1  manage  306.7 K  20180220  11:46  ChristianOhm  
eps  METFraction.eps  r1  manage  19.3 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
METFraction.pdf  r1  manage  17.7 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  METFraction.png  r1  manage  45.6 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
eps  Muons_ESpectrum.eps  r1  manage  9.1 K  20161014  16:33  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_ESpectrum.gif  r1  manage  8.4 K  20161014  16:33  MartinAleksa  
Muons_ESpectrum.pdf  r1  manage  14.3 K  20161014  16:33  MartinAleksa  
eps  Muons_EfctR.eps  r1  manage  10.2 K  20161014  16:38  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_EfctR.gif  r1  manage  8.0 K  20161014  16:38  MartinAleksa  
Muons_EfctR.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20161014  16:38  MartinAleksa  
eps  Muons_effR0.eps  r1  manage  10.5 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_effR0.gif  r1  manage  9.9 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
Muons_effR0.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
eps  Muons_effR4.eps  r1  manage  10.6 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_effR4.gif  r1  manage  10.0 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
Muons_effR4.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20161014  16:39  MartinAleksa  
eps  Muons_effXY0.eps  r1  manage  14.9 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_effXY0.gif  r1  manage  14.4 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
Muons_effXY0.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
eps  Muons_effXY4.eps  r1  manage  68.4 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
gif  Muons_effXY4.gif  r1  manage  21.8 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
Muons_effXY4.pdf  r1  manage  25.6 K  20161014  16:45  MartinAleksa  
eps  Occupancy_MB_Si_all.eps  r1  manage  102.6 K  20170929  11:21  DirkZerwas  
Occupancy_MB_Si_all.pdf  r1  manage  23.4 K  20170929  11:21  DirkZerwas  
png  Occupancy_MB_Si_all.png  r1  manage  20.5 K  20170929  11:21  DirkZerwas  
png  PD_voltage1.png  r1  manage  73.4 K  20190509  22:51  SimoneMicheleMazza  Power dissipation 
PD_voltage.pdf  r1  manage  15.2 K  20190509  22:51  SimoneMicheleMazza  Power dissipation  
eps  PUeffpt3050.eps  r1  manage  11.4 K  20171002  13:15  DirkZerwas  
PUeffpt3050.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20171002  13:15  DirkZerwas  
eps  PUeffpt3050.pdf.eps  r1  manage  11.4 K  20171002  13:13  DirkZerwas  
PUeffpt3050.pdf.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20171002  13:13  DirkZerwas  
png  PUeffpt3050.pdf.png  r1  manage  41.9 K  20171002  13:13  DirkZerwas  
png  PUeffpt3050.png  r1  manage  41.9 K  20171002  13:15  DirkZerwas  
eps  Photons_nCellsC0.eps  r1  manage  71.6 K  20170705  18:03  DirkZerwas  
Photons_nCellsC0.pdf  r1  manage  31.9 K  20170705  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  Photons_nCellsC0.png  r1  manage  107.3 K  20170705  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  Plot_CNMAIDA_bias_voltage_vs_charge_1.png  r1  manage  68.4 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_CNMAIDA_bias_voltage_vs_charge_.pdf  r1  manage  19.6 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Plot_CNMAIDA_bias_voltage_vs_time_res_1.png  r1  manage  63.3 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_CNMAIDA_bias_voltage_vs_time_res_.pdf  r1  manage  19.2 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Plot_HPK12_bias_voltage_vs_charge1.png  r1  manage  72.8 K  20200516  02:53  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_HPK12_bias_voltage_vs_charge.pdf  r1  manage  20.5 K  20200516  02:55  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_charge1.png  r2 r1  manage  81.6 K  20200516  02:48  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_charge.pdf  r2 r1  manage  20.6 K  20200516  02:48  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_charge_1.png  r1  manage  84.3 K  20200616  03:59  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_charge_.pdf  r1  manage  20.5 K  20200616  03:55  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_time_res1.png  r1  manage  85.6 K  20200516  02:48  SimoneMicheleMazza  
Plot_HPK32_bias_voltage_vs_time_res.pdf  r1  manage  20.7 K  20200516  02:48  SimoneMicheleMazza  
eps  Pulse_33_48_3.eps  r1  manage  10.9 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
Pulse_33_48_3.pdf  r1  manage  16.5 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
png  Pulse_33_48_3.png  r1  manage  14.9 K  20161014  17:52  MartinAleksa  
eps  Pulse_Nominal.eps  r1  manage  88.8 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
Pulse_Nominal.pdf  r1  manage  52.8 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
png  Pulse_Nominal.png  r1  manage  15.8 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
eps  RMSMETPU2HGTD.eps  r1  manage  10.9 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
RMSMETPU2HGTD.pdf  r1  manage  14.1 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
png  RMSMETPU2HGTD.png  r1  manage  40.9 K  20171002  18:03  DirkZerwas  
eps  ROC2438_16.eps  r1  manage  12.2 K  20170705  16:16  DirkZerwas  
ROC2438_16.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20170705  16:17  DirkZerwas  
png  ROC2438_16.png  r2 r1  manage  69.0 K  20170705  16:16  DirkZerwas  
Radiation_IDR_last.pdf  r2 r1  manage  215.6 K  20170223  10:30  AnaHenriques  
eps  RiseTime_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.eps  r1  manage  9.2 K  20161014  18:09  MartinAleksa  
RiseTime_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.pdf  r1  manage  14.4 K  20161014  18:09  MartinAleksa  
png  RiseTime_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.png  r1  manage  16.5 K  20161014  18:09  MartinAleksa  
eps  SOverN_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.eps  r1  manage  9.2 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
SOverN_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.pdf  r1  manage  14.3 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
png  SOverN_Probe_GausMean_vs_biasVoltage.png  r1  manage  15.6 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
eps  SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEta2p8to3p0.eps  r1  manage  18.9 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEta2p8to3p0.pdf  r1  manage  21.2 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
png  SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEta2p8to3p0.png  r1  manage  42.8 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
eps  SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEtafull.eps  r1  manage  16.5 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEtafull.pdf  r1  manage  20.1 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
png  SiItkInclNomminbiasLowPtnHitsVsMuEtafull.png  r1  manage  40.9 K  20170705  16:12  DirkZerwas  
Sim_July2019_1_ModuleOverlaps.pdf  r1  manage  30.3 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1  
png  Sim_July2019_1_ModuleOverlaps.png  r1  manage  35.5 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1 
Sim_July2019_2a_x0.pdf  r1  manage  99.9 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1  
png  Sim_July2019_2a_x0.png  r1  manage  186.1 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1 
Sim_July2019_2b_lambda.pdf  r1  manage  144.7 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1  
png  Sim_July2019_2b_lambda.png  r1  manage  166.3 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1 
Sim_July2019_3_MainParameters.pdf  r1  manage  91.4 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1  
png  Sim_July2019_3_MainParameters.png  r1  manage  43.7 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1 
png  Sim_July2019_4_EventDisplay.png  r1  manage  289.8 K  20190713  10:32  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 1 
Sim_July2019_5a_ModulePlacementQuadrant.pdf  r2 r1  manage  239.3 K  20190713  11:22  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2  
png  Sim_July2019_5a_ModulePlacementQuadrant.png  r2 r1  manage  743.0 K  20190713  11:22  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2 
Sim_July2019_5b_ModulePlacementFullDisk.pdf  r2 r1  manage  551.6 K  20200110  13:34  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2  
png  Sim_July2019_5b_ModulePlacementFullDisk.png  r2 r1  manage  1124.8 K  20190713  11:21  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2 
Sim_July2019_6a_HitTimingResolution.pdf  r1  manage  23.1 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2  
png  Sim_July2019_6a_HitTimingResolution.png  r1  manage  189.9 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2 
Sim_July2019_6b_TrackTimingResolution.pdf  r1  manage  23.3 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2  
png  Sim_July2019_6b_TrackTimingResolution.png  r1  manage  201.3 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2 
Sim_July2019_7_OccupancyITkStep3p0.pdf  r1  manage  127.2 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2  
png  Sim_July2019_7_OccupancyITkStep3p0.png  r1  manage  49.8 K  20190713  10:35  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 2 
png  Sim_July2019_8_nHits_xy.png  r1  manage  361.4 K  20190713  10:36  ChristianOhm  Simulation performance plots July 2019, batch 3 
TB_Oct18_toaDistr_tw.pdf  r1  manage  16.2 K  20181130  13:58  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
png  TB_Oct18_toaDistr_tw.png  r1  manage  39.3 K  20181130  14:14  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
png  TCT_distances1.png  r1  manage  83.6 K  20190509  22:52  SimoneMicheleMazza  IP distances with TCT 
TCT_distances.pdf  r1  manage  18.5 K  20190509  22:52  SimoneMicheleMazza  IP distances with TCT  
TDCTDR.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
png  TDCTDR.png  r1  manage  14.4 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
TIDsensor_asicplot.pdf  r1  manage  17.7 K  20200507  14:21  StefanG  
eps  TOA.eps  r1  manage  10.5 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
TOA.pdf  r1  manage  15.2 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
png  TOA.png  r1  manage  15.2 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
TOTCmean_TDR2.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20200529  14:45  MakovecNikola  
png  TOTCmean_TDR2.png  r1  manage  12.8 K  20200529  14:45  MakovecNikola  
eps  TrackMatchEff_pt.eps  r1  manage  10.9 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
TrackMatchEff_pt.pdf  r1  manage  14.9 K  20170704  19:37  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackMatchEff_pt.png  r1  manage  19.3 K  20170704  19:37  DirkZerwas  
eps  TrackTimeMatchEff_EffvsPt.eps  r1  manage  10.9 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
TrackTimeMatchEff_EffvsPt.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackTimeMatchEff_EffvsPt.png  r1  manage  20.0 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
eps  TrackdTPublicPlot_1mm.eps  r1  manage  14.8 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
TrackdTPublicPlot_1mm.pdf  r1  manage  19.0 K  20170704  19:36  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackdTPublicPlot_1mm.png  r1  manage  23.9 K  20170705  07:49  DirkZerwas  
eps  TrackdTPublicPlot_3mm.eps  r1  manage  15.0 K  20170705  07:49  DirkZerwas  
TrackdTPublicPlot_3mm.pdf  r1  manage  19.3 K  20170705  07:48  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackdTPublicPlot_3mm.png  r1  manage  25.8 K  20170705  07:48  DirkZerwas  
eps  TrackdXPublicPlot_1mm.eps  r2 r1  manage  13.2 K  20170705  07:58  DirkZerwas  
TrackdXPublicPlot_1mm.pdf  r2 r1  manage  20.0 K  20170705  07:58  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackdXPublicPlot_1mm.png  r2 r1  manage  19.4 K  20170705  07:58  DirkZerwas  
eps  TrackdXPublicPlot_3mm.eps  r2 r1  manage  14.2 K  20170705  07:57  DirkZerwas  
TrackdXPublicPlot_3mm.pdf  r2 r1  manage  20.3 K  20170705  07:57  DirkZerwas  
png  TrackdXPublicPlot_3mm.png  r2 r1  manage  21.1 K  20170705  07:57  DirkZerwas  
eps  Treco.eps  r1  manage  11.9 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
Treco.pdf  r1  manage  16.6 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
png  Treco.png  r1  manage  14.3 K  20170705  17:47  DirkZerwas  
eps  Truth_Vertex.eps  r2 r1  manage  15.9 K  20170921  09:30  DirkZerwas  
Truth_Vertex.pdf  r2 r1  manage  20.7 K  20170921  09:31  DirkZerwas  
png  Truth_Vertex.png  r2 r1  manage  28.1 K  20170921  10:09  DirkZerwas  
eps  Truth_Vertex_zoom.eps  r2 r1  manage  12.1 K  20170921  09:32  DirkZerwas  
Truth_Vertex_zoom.pdf  r2 r1  manage  15.4 K  20170921  09:33  DirkZerwas  
png  Truth_Vertex_zoom.png  r2 r1  manage  19.1 K  20170921  09:34  DirkZerwas  
VBD2Dmap15x15ArrayType3p1.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20190502  11:15  JoernLange  VBD map of HPK3.150 15x15 array  
png  VBD2Dmap15x15ArrayType3p1.png  r1  manage  15.4 K  20190502  11:34  JoernLange  VBD map of HPK3.150 15x15 array 
png  VglVsFluence.png  r1  manage  133.1 K  20220210  14:10  GregorKramberger  Vgl dependence on fluence 
png  Vseb.png  r1  manage  101.6 K  20220210  14:21  GregorKramberger  Single Event Burnout voltage dependence on sensor thickness 
eps  W11_HG11_effR_vs_y.eps  r1  manage  21.4 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
W11_HG11_effR_vs_y.pdf  r1  manage  17.8 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
png  W11_HG11_effR_vs_y.png  r1  manage  32.6 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
eps  bVSlight__MV1.eps  r1  manage  32.8 K  20170929  13:06  DirkZerwas  
bVSlight__MV1.pdf  r1  manage  43.2 K  20170929  13:06  DirkZerwas  
png  bVSlight__MV1.png  r1  manage  26.4 K  20170929  13:06  DirkZerwas  
eps  batch207_deltaT.eps  r1  manage  183.9 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch207_deltaT.gif  r1  manage  31.8 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch207_deltaT.pdf  r1  manage  38.2 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
eps  batch207_eff.eps  r1  manage  176.6 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch207_eff.gif  r1  manage  23.9 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch207_eff.pdf  r1  manage  42.1 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
eps  batch207_effX.eps  r1  manage  23.9 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch207_effX.gif  r1  manage  20.3 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch207_effX.pdf  r1  manage  25.4 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
eps  batch507_deltaT.eps  r1  manage  217.2 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch507_deltaT.gif  r1  manage  38.0 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch507_deltaT.pdf  r1  manage  41.3 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
eps  batch507_eff.eps  r1  manage  132.9 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch507_eff.gif  r1  manage  21.0 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch507_eff.pdf  r1  manage  35.3 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
eps  batch507_effX.eps  r1  manage  26.3 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
gif  batch507_effX.gif  r1  manage  22.8 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch507_effX.pdf  r1  manage  28.1 K  20180517  15:30  MakovecNikola  
batch608_eff_map_2fC_high_stats_plot.pdf  r1  manage  9.7 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  batch608_eff_map_2fC_high_stats_plot.png  r1  manage  12.4 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
batch608_timing_map_2fC_fullsensor_low_stats_plot.pdf  r1  manage  9.2 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  batch608_timing_map_2fC_fullsensor_low_stats_plot.png  r1  manage  11.3 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
batch608_timing_map_2fC_low_stats_plot.pdf  r1  manage  8.9 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  batch608_timing_map_2fC_low_stats_plot.png  r1  manage  9.9 K  20200506  10:34  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
png  bias_voltage_vs_charge_0fC_vs_bias_n1.png  r1  manage  53.7 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
bias_voltage_vs_charge_0fC_vs_bias_n.pdf  r1  manage  14.4 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  bias_voltage_vs_charge_0fC_vs_bias_p1.png  r1  manage  48.0 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
bias_voltage_vs_charge_0fC_vs_bias_p.pdf  r1  manage  14.3 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  bias_voltage_vs_time_res_0fC_vs_bias_n1.png  r1  manage  51.7 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
bias_voltage_vs_time_res_0fC_vs_bias_n.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20200616  03:33  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  bias_voltage_vs_time_res_0fC_vs_bias_p1.png  r1  manage  48.0 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
bias_voltage_vs_time_res_0fC_vs_bias_p.pdf  r1  manage  14.4 K  20200616  03:34  SimoneMicheleMazza  
chargeCNM_prelim.pdf  r1  manage  17.2 K  20220221  10:21  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge MPV forCNM versus bias voltage  
png  chargeCNM_prelim.png  r1  manage  160.7 K  20220223  16:15  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge for CNM versus bias voltage 
chargeHPK_prelim.pdf  r1  manage  16.1 K  20220221  10:52  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge MPV for HPK versus bias voltage  
png  chargeHPK_prelim.png  r1  manage  167.1 K  20220223  16:16  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge for HPK versus bias voltage 
sh  convert.sh  r1  manage  0.2 K  20190713  13:06  ChristianOhm  Script for converting PDF files to PNG with appropriate quality and size 
dTOA_B13_ch3_reso_380.pdf  r1  manage  16.7 K  20200529  20:37  MakovecNikola  
png  dTOA_B13_ch3_reso_380.png  r1  manage  38.5 K  20200529  20:37  MakovecNikola  
delayScanTrigExt_B_2_ch_0_TDR.pdf  r1  manage  17.6 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
png  delayScanTrigExt_B_2_ch_0_TDR.png  r1  manage  15.8 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
distribfbkanglecharge.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20220627  00:22  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge distribution for several beam incidence angles at DESY test beam (FBK)  
png  distribfbkanglecharge.png  r1  manage  24.1 K  20220627  00:22  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge distribution for several beam incidence angles at DESY test beam (FBK) 
distribimeanglecharge.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20220627  00:23  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge distribution for several beam incidence angles at DESY test beam (IHEPIME)  
png  distribimeanglecharge.png  r1  manage  26.2 K  20220627  00:23  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Charge distribution for several beam incidence angles at DESY test beam (IHEPIME) 
eff_TDR.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20200529  14:45  MakovecNikola  
png  eff_TDR.png  r1  manage  14.5 K  20200529  14:45  MakovecNikola  
eff_vs_Q.pdf  r1  manage  19.2 K  20190509  13:42  JoernLange  
png  eff_vs_Q.png  r1  manage  85.0 K  20190509  13:42  JoernLange  
effic_vs_Q_W6.pdf  r1  manage  15.8 K  20210126  19:05  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
png  effic_vs_Q_W6.png  r1  manage  45.0 K  20210126  19:05  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
effic_vs_V_W6.pdf  r1  manage  14.8 K  20210126  19:05  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
png  effic_vs_V_W6.png  r1  manage  37.2 K  20210126  19:05  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
png  efficiency_map_IHEPIMEv2W7Q2.png  r1  manage  137.7 K  20220623  16:41  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  Study of sensors with beam tests at CERN SPS using MALT in 2021 and at DESY in 2022 (FBK, IHEPIME and USTCIME). Study of the collected charge, efficiency, time resolution and angular effects. 
eps  elec_Display_0.eps  r1  manage  49.8 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_Display_0.gif  r1  manage  11.1 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
elec_Display_0.pdf  r1  manage  24.2 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_Display_200.eps  r1  manage  5681.9 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_Display_200.gif  r1  manage  33.5 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
elec_Display_200.pdf  r1  manage  1287.7 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_Display_lego200.eps  r1  manage  226.8 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_Display_lego200.gif  r1  manage  21.7 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
elec_Display_lego200.pdf  r1  manage  59.2 K  20161014  16:48  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_Display_lego200_all.eps  r1  manage  49160.3 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
gif  elec_Display_lego200_all.gif  r1  manage  542.3 K  20170705  18:01  DirkZerwas  
elec_Display_lego200_all.pdf  r1  manage  568.4 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
eps  elec_Display_lego200_cluster.eps  r1  manage  49160.3 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
gif  elec_Display_lego200_cluster.gif  r1  manage  235.5 K  20170705  18:01  DirkZerwas  
elec_Display_lego200_cluster.pdf  r1  manage  250.5 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
eps  elec_Display_lego200_elec.eps  r1  manage  49160.3 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
gif  elec_Display_lego200_elec.gif  r1  manage  211.6 K  20170705  18:01  DirkZerwas  
elec_Display_lego200_elec.pdf  r1  manage  224.6 K  20170706  11:46  DirkZerwas  
eps  elec_Es0.eps  r1  manage  8.4 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_Es0.gif  r1  manage  8.7 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
elec_Es0.pdf  r1  manage  13.6 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_Es3.eps  r1  manage  9.4 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_Es3.gif  r1  manage  9.5 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
elec_Es3.pdf  r1  manage  13.9 K  20161014  17:02  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_nCells.eps  r1  manage  7.4 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_nCells.gif  r1  manage  7.0 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
elec_nCells.pdf  r1  manage  13.4 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
eps  elec_showerRadius.eps  r1  manage  7.3 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
gif  elec_showerRadius.gif  r1  manage  7.2 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
elec_showerRadius.pdf  r1  manage  13.4 K  20161014  16:54  MartinAleksa  
png  figure3_InverseCVBeforeIrradiation1.png  r1  manage  84.4 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure3_InverseCVBeforeIrradiation.pdf  r1  manage  30.8 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  figure4_DopingBeforeIrradiationE11.png  r1  manage  79.5 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure4_DopingBeforeIrradiationE1.pdf  r1  manage  16.2 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  figure6a_TimeResolution31.png  r1  manage  52.3 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure6a_TimeResolution3.pdf  r1  manage  14.2 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  figure6b_1E15TimeResolution31.png  r1  manage  53.0 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure6b_1E15TimeResolution3.pdf  r1  manage  14.4 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  figure7a_CollectedCharge31.png  r1  manage  51.3 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure7a_CollectedCharge3.pdf  r1  manage  14.1 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
png  figure7b_1E15CollectedCharge31.png  r1  manage  48.4 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
figure7b_1E15CollectedCharge3.pdf  r1  manage  14.0 K  20200516  01:39  SimoneMicheleMazza  
eps  histogram2D_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.eps  r1  manage  10.7 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
histogram2D_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
png  histogram2D_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.png  r1  manage  33.8 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  histogramT_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.eps  r1  manage  10.6 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
histogramT_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
png  histogramT_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.png  r1  manage  34.6 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  histogramZ_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.eps  r1  manage  11.6 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
histogramZ_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
png  histogramZ_event15_vtxid0_eta3.8.png  r1  manage  32.4 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  jetfractioneta2_time30.eps  r1  manage  12.6 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
jetfractioneta2_time30.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
png  jetfractioneta2_time30.png  r1  manage  52.0 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  jetfractioneta3_time30.eps  r1  manage  12.7 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
jetfractioneta3_time30.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
png  jetfractioneta3_time30.png  r1  manage  50.5 K  20170929  19:27  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  jetfractioneta5.eps  r1  manage  13.1 K  20170929  19:26  ArielSchwartzman  
jetfractioneta5.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20170929  19:26  ArielSchwartzman  
png  jetfractioneta5.png  r1  manage  41.4 K  20170929  19:26  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  jetfractioneta5_time30.eps  r1  manage  13.3 K  20170929  19:25  ArielSchwartzman  
jetfractioneta5_time30.pdf  r1  manage  14.7 K  20170929  19:25  ArielSchwartzman  
png  jetfractioneta5_time30.png  r1  manage  43.7 K  20170929  19:25  ArielSchwartzman  
jitterTDR.pdf  r1  manage  15.1 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
png  jitterTDR.png  r1  manage  23.6 K  20200529  14:34  MakovecNikola  
jitter_vs_Qinj.pdf  r1  manage  14.1 K  20190527  17:34  SabrinaSacerdoti  ALTIROC1 jitter vs Qinj  
png  jitter_vs_Qinj.png  r1  manage  129.9 K  20190527  17:42  SabrinaSacerdoti  Altiroc1 Jitter vs Qinj 
jitter_vs_Qinj_zoom.pdf  r1  manage  14.2 K  20190527  17:39  SabrinaSacerdoti  ALTIROC1 jitter vs Qinj  
mpv_boron.pdf  r1  manage  14.6 K  20210127  07:47  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
png  mpv_boron.png  r1  manage  101.9 K  20210127  07:47  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
nHitsVsMuMultiple.pdf  r2 r1  manage  28.8 K  20180220  11:37  ChristianOhm  
png  nHitsVsMuMultiple.png  r2 r1  manage  378.3 K  20180220  11:39  ChristianOhm  
eps  occupancy_vs_r_41.eps  r2 r1  manage  16.5 K  20170704  19:19  DirkZerwas  
occupancy_vs_r_41.pdf  r2 r1  manage  18.0 K  20170704  19:19  DirkZerwas  
png  occupancy_vs_r_41.png  r2 r1  manage  39.8 K  20170704  19:18  DirkZerwas  
eps  occupancy_vs_r_42.eps  r1  manage  12.8 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
occupancy_vs_r_42.pdf  r1  manage  15.4 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
png  occupancy_vs_r_42.png  r1  manage  25.1 K  20161014  16:27  MartinAleksa  
eps  pufraction_2.4_3.8.eps  r2 r1  manage  12.4 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
pufraction_2.4_3.8.pdf  r2 r1  manage  52.3 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
png  pufraction_2.4_3.8.png  r2 r1  manage  113.0 K  20170619  08:47  MartinAleksa  
eps  pulseHeightDen7.eps  r1  manage  17.0 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
gif  pulseHeightDen7.gif  r1  manage  13.7 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
pulseHeightDen7.pdf  r1  manage  18.9 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
eps  pulseHeightEff7.eps  r1  manage  15.6 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
gif  pulseHeightEff7.gif  r1  manage  12.2 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
pulseHeightEff7.pdf  r1  manage  19.0 K  20180517  15:29  MakovecNikola  
png  seb.png  r1  manage  458.3 K  20220210  14:24  GregorKramberger  Typical Single Event Burnout mark. 
sigmaCNM_prelim.pdf  r1  manage  17.1 K  20220221  10:52  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Sigma for CNM versus bias voltage  
png  sigmaCNM_prelim.png  r1  manage  171.7 K  20220223  16:18  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Time resolution for CNM versus bias voltage 
sigmaHPK_prelim.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20220221  10:53  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Sigma for HPK versus bias voltage  
png  sigmaHPK_prelim.png  r1  manage  66.1 K  20220223  16:18  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Time resolution for HPK versus bias voltage 
sigma_mpv_prel.pdf  r1  manage  17.2 K  20220221  10:54  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Sigma versus Charge MPV for CNM and HPK  
png  sigma_mpv_prel.png  r1  manage  199.4 K  20220223  16:20  LuciaCastilloGarcia  Time resolution for CNM and HPK versus charge 
t0calib_fig01.pdf  r1  manage  15.8 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019  
png  t0calib_fig01.png  r1  manage  208.1 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019 
t0calib_fig02.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019  
png  t0calib_fig02.png  r1  manage  233.7 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019 
t0calib_fig03.pdf  r1  manage  15.4 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019  
png  t0calib_fig03.png  r1  manage  232.2 K  20190711  13:59  EmmaElizabethTolley  HGTD T0 calibration performance from TDR draft April 2019 
png  tdr_timing_50_30um_CFD501.png  r1  manage  83.3 K  20190509  22:52  SimoneMicheleMazza  
tdr_timing_50_30um_CFD50.pdf  r1  manage  19.5 K  20190509  22:52  SimoneMicheleMazza  
eps  timeResoProbe_vs_Gain_Probe_LandauMpv.eps  r1  manage  9.1 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
timeResoProbe_vs_Gain_Probe_LandauMpv.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
png  timeResoProbe_vs_Gain_Probe_LandauMpv.png  r1  manage  15.3 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
eps  timeResoProbe_vs_biasVoltage.eps  r1  manage  9.6 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
timeResoProbe_vs_biasVoltage.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
png  timeResoProbe_vs_biasVoltage.png  r1  manage  16.2 K  20161014  18:01  MartinAleksa  
timing_fit_20_50.pdf  r1  manage  9.9 K  20200608  11:06  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results  
png  timing_fit_20_50.png  r1  manage  11.9 K  20200608  11:06  LuciaCastilloGarcia  CNM Gallium 3e15 neq/cm2 results 
toa_vs_amp_TB_Oct18.pdf  r1  manage  23.0 K  20181130  13:58  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
png  toa_vs_amp_TB_Oct18.png  r1  manage  60.8 K  20181130  14:14  ChristinaAgapopoulou  
png  toa_vs_tot_B13_ch3_reso_3801.png  r1  manage  124.1 K  20200529  20:37  MakovecNikola  
toa_vs_tot_B13_ch3_reso_380.pdf  r1  manage  18.4 K  20200529  20:37  MakovecNikola  
tsigma_3_2_v3.pdf  r1  manage  14.5 K  20210127  07:47  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
png  tsigma_3_2_v3.png  r1  manage  103.2 K  20210127  07:47  DjamelBOUMEDIENE  
eps  vertex_density_hl.eps  r1  manage  11.9 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
vertex_density_hl.pdf  r1  manage  15.0 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
png  vertex_density_hl.png  r1  manage  13.4 K  20170705  17:43  DirkZerwas  
eps  vertex_density_run2.eps  r2 r1  manage  11.4 K  20171025  18:13  DirkZerwas  
vertex_density_run2.pdf  r2 r1  manage  15.6 K  20171025  18:14  DirkZerwas  
png  vertex_density_run2.png  r2 r1  manage  12.0 K  20171025  18:15  DirkZerwas  
eps  xyEffR_W11_HG11_mm.eps  r1  manage  176.2 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
xyEffR_W11_HG11_mm.pdf  r1  manage  50.7 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
png  xyEffR_W11_HG11_mm.png  r1  manage  41.7 K  20170124  18:06  MartinAleksa  
eps  zrho_event15_vtxid0.eps  r1  manage  15.9 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
zrho_event15_vtxid0.pdf  r1  manage  16.4 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
png  zrho_event15_vtxid0.png  r1  manage  93.4 K  20170929  19:28  ArielSchwartzman  
eps  zrho_jets_event15_sel0.eps  r1  manage  14.1 K  20170929  20:13  ArielSchwartzman  
zrho_jets_event15_sel0.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20170929  20:13  ArielSchwartzman  
png  zrho_jets_event15_sel0.png  r1  manage  67.6 K  20170929  20:13  ArielSchwartzman 