Jet response ratio of the data to the Monte Carlo simulation as a function of pT for three in situ techniques combined to determine the in situ energy scale correction: Z+jet (squares), gamma+jet (full triangles) and multijet (empty triangles). The error bars indicate the statistical and the total uncertainties (adding in quadrature statistical and systematic uncer- tainties). The results are shown for anti-kt jets with radius parameter of R = 0.4 calibrated with the LCW+JES scheme. The result of the combination of the in situ techniques is shown as the dark line. The outer band indicates the total uncertainty resulting from the combination of in situ techniques, while the inner dark band shows the fraction purely from statistical uncertainties. | ![]() [eps] |
Fractional jet energy scale systematic uncertainty components as a function of pT for anti-kt jets at |eta| = 0.0 with radius parameter of R = 0.4 calibrated using the LCW+JES calibration scheme. The total uncertainty (all components summed in quadrature) is shown as a filled blue region topped by a solid black line. Average 2012 pileup conditions were used, and topology dependent components were taken from inclusive dijet samples. | ![]() [eps] |
Fractional jet energy scale systematic uncertainty components as a function of pseudorapidity for anti-kt jets at pT = 40 GeV with radius parameter of R = 0.4 calibrated using the LCW+JES calibration scheme. The total uncertainty (all components summed in quadrature) is shown as a filled blue region topped by a solid black line. Average 2012 pileup conditions were used, and topology dependent components were taken from inclusive dijet samples. | ![]() [eps] |