# Introduction

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events. Please do not add figures on your own. Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Follow the guidelines on the trigger public results page.

# Performance plots for Phase-I upgrades

## Performance estimation of the Level-1 Endcap muon trigger at Run 2 and Run 3: ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033 (27 May 2018)

 The pseudo-rapidity (η) distributions of the Level-1 MU20 RoI. The L1 MU20 candidates in Run 2 are collected by pass-through triggers (HLT_noalg_L1MU20), in 2017 data with a center-ofmass energy of 13 TeV and a bunch-crossing interval of 25 ns. The distribution when enabling TileCal-TGC coincidence is estimated from 2017 data. The expected distribution in Run 2 shows the final distribution at the end of Run 2 after enabling TileCal coincidence. Matching between the offline muon and the L1 MU20 RoI requires dR < 0.1, where dR is calculated from dη, dφ between the offline muon position extrapolated to RoI plane and the central position of the RoI. png pdf eps contact: Shunichi Akatsuka, Yuta Okazaki, & Junpei Maeda The pseudo-rapidity (η) distributions of the Level-1 MU20 RoI. The L1 MU20 candidates in Run 2 are collected by pass-through triggers (HLT_noalg_L1MU20), in 2017 data with a center-ofmass energy of 13 TeV and a bunch-crossing interval of 25 ns. The distribution when enabling TileCal-TGC coincidence is estimated from 2017 data. The distributions when enabling RPC BIS7/8 and NSW coincidence are estimated from MDT segments information and single muon MC study results. The expected distribution in Run 3 shows the final distribution in Run 3 after enabling all TileCal, RPC BIS7/8, and NSW coincidences. Matching between the offline muon and the L1 MU20 RoI requires dR < 0.1, where dR is calculated from dη, dφ between the offline muon position extrapolated to RoI plane and the central position of the RoI. png pdf eps contact: Shunichi Akatsuka, Yuta Okazaki & Junpei Maeda

## Performance estimation of the Level-1 Endcap muon trigger by using NSW angle information: ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022 (May 6, 2017)

Distributions of difference in η between the Level-1 Region of Interest (RoI) in the TGC Big Wheel (BW) and the track segment position in the New Small Wheel (NSW), and dθ measured at NSW. dθ is defined as dθ = θposition - θtrack, where θposition is the polar angle calculated from the position of the track segment, and θtrack is the polar angle of the track vector. The distributions are obtained by simulation with muon pT = 20 GeV (left), 40 GeV (right). Two peaks are observed in the left figure (pT= 20 GeV) due to the different charges of the muons. In the right figure (pT = 40 GeV), because the pT of the muons are higher, the split of the two peaks are smaller, and therefore they are not resolved.
 png pdf eps png pdf eps contact: Shunichi Akatsuka & Junpei Maeda
Relative trigger efficiencies compared to Run-2 Level-1 trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV (L1_MU20), at 1.3 < |ηRoI| < 2.4. The Run-2 L1_MU20 requires position matching of TGC Big Wheel (BW) and the TGC Forward-Inner chamber (FI) at 1.3 < |ηRoI| < 2.4. The efficiencies are measured with offline reconstructed muons, and are shown as a function of the transverse momentum of the muons. Efficiencies with additional coincidence requirements applied to the L1_MU20 are shown by coloured points. The open circle points show the efficiency with New Small Wheel (NSW) coincidence logic using dη-dθ coincidence window, described in ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142. The open triangle points show the efficiency with NSW coincidence logic using both dη-dφ and dη-dθ coincidence window derived from the simulation study. The track segment finding efficiency in the NSW is assumed to be 97%.
png pdf eps
contact: Shunichi Akatsuka & Junpei Maeda
pT distributions of offline reconstructed muons matched to a Level-1 trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV (L1_MU20), at 1.3 < |ηRoI| < 2.4. Matching between the offline muon and the L1_MU20 RoI requires dR < 0.5, where dR is calculated from η, φ of the offline muon at I.P. and the central position of the L1_MU20 RoI. The distribution of Run-2 L1_MU20 candidates, generated by the TGC Big Wheel (BW) and TGC Forward-Inner chamber (FI), are collected by pass-through triggers (HLT_noalg_L1MU20), in 2016 data with a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and a bunch-crossing interval of 25 nsec. The distributions when including each New Small Wheel (NSW) coincidence logics are estimated by multiplying the relative trigger efficiencies measured by simulation.
png pdf eps
contact: Shunichi Akatsuka & Junpei Maeda

## Performance estimation of Level1 endcap muon trigger for Run3: ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142 (September 20, 2015)

 Distributions of position differences between the Level-1 Region of Interest (RoI) in the TGC Big Wheel (BW) and track segments in the New Small Wheel (NSW). The distributions are obtained by simulations with muon pT = 20 GeV (top), 40 GeV (bottom). Two peaks are observed in the distribution with muon pT = 20 GeV since the position differences depend on muon’s charge. Criteria of the position matching between the BW-RoI and NSW-track for the Level-1 endcap muon trigger for Run3 are defined from these distributions. png eps png eps contact: Tomoe Kishimoto L1_MU20 trigger efficiencies when including the TGC Forward Inner station (FI) or New Small Wheel (NSW) with respect to the trigger efficiency of the TGC Big Wheel (BW) standalone. The track segment finding efficiency in the NSW is assumed to be 97%. L1_MU20 is a Level-1 trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV. The trigger efficiencies are measured with offline reconstructed muons with 1.3 < |eta| < 2.5, and shown as a function of the transverse momentum of the muons. During Run1, only TGC BW was used to generate the Level-1 endcap muon triggers. In Run3 (Run2), a coincidence with NSW (TGC FI) will be introduced to reduce the trigger rate. png eps contact: Tomoe Kishimoto pT distributions of offline reconstructed muons with 1.3 < |eta| < 2.5 matched to a L1_MU20 candidate. L1_MU20 is a Level-1 trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 20 GeV. The distribution with L1_MU20 candidates generated by the TGC Big Wheel (BW) standalone are obtained from a data sample collected by pass-through triggers (HLT_noalg_L1MU20) in run276329, which was taken on 16-17 Aug. 2015 with a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV and a bunch-crossing interval of 25 nsec. The distributions when including the TGC Forward Inner station (FI) or New Small Wheel (NSW) are estimated by multiplying the relative trigger efficiencies measured by simulations. During Run1, only TGC BW was used to generate the Level-1 endcap muon triggers. In Run3 (Run2), a coincidence with NSW (TGC FI) will be introduced to reduce the trigger rate. png eps contact: Tomoe Kishimoto

# 2017 data

## Performance plots for Level1 Barrel Muon Trigger: ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008 (Feb 16, 2018)

 L1_MU10 efficiency gain from new new feet trigger chambers in sector 12 Efficiency of Level 1 MU10 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -2.16 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -1.77) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Level 1 muon trigger system, using medium trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon Level 1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps L1_MU11 efficiency gain from new new feet trigger chambers in sector 12 Efficiency of Level 1 MU11 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -2.16 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -1.77) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT Level 1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon Level 1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps L1_MU10 efficiency gain from new new feet trigger chambers in sector 14 Efficiency of Level 1 MU10 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.37 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -0.98) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Level 1 muon trigger system, using medium trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon Level 1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps L1_MU11 efficiency gain from new new feet trigger chambers in sector 14 Efficiency of Level 1 MU11 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.37 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -0.98) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT Level 1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon Level 1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps L1_MU10 efficiency in 2016 and 2017 Efficiency of Level 1 MU10 trigger in 2017 and comparison with 2016 trigger efficiency. The efficiency is plotted as a function of φ at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system, using medium trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. png pdf eps L1_MU11 efficiency in 2016 and 2017 Efficiency of Level 1 MU11 trigger in 2017 and comparison with 2016 trigger efficiency. The efficiency is plotted as a function of φ at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT L1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. png pdf eps L1_MU10 efficiency 2017 / 2016 ratio η-φ map of the ratio between the Level 1 Barrel muon trigger efficiency in 2017 and 2016 for the trigger threshold MU10. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system, using medium trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The blank bins correspond to regions of the Muon Spectrometer not covered by RPC trigger detectors. png pdf eps L1_MU11 efficiency 2017 / 2016 ratio η-φ map of the ratio between the Level 1 Barrel muon trigger efficiency in 2017 and 2016 for the trigger threshold MU11. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass a “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT Level 1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The blank bins correspond to regions of the Muon Spectrometer not covered by RPC trigger detectors. png pdf eps Turn-on curves for all L1 thresholds Level 1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for reconstructed muons with pT > 15 GeV and |η| < 1.05 as a function of transverse momentum. The efficiency is shown for the six Level-1 thresholds: MU4, MU6, MU10 which require a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations, and MU11, MU20, MU21 with a further coincidence on the outer RPC stations. The MU20 threshold takes into account the full muon barrel region, while for the otherwise identical MU21 the new feet trigger is excluded. For this reason, the trigger efficiency is higher for MU20. The efficiency is measured using events selected by independent triggers and requiring an offline reconstructed muon. png pdf eps Plateau efficiencies for all L1 thresholds Plateau value of the Level 1 muon barrel trigger efficiency (as a function of muon pT) for reconstructed muons with pT > 15 GeV and |η| < 1.05 as a function of time. Each point corresponds to a different ATLAS run recorded in 2017. Only runs with integrated luminosity greater than 50 pb-1 and at least 1000 reconstructed muons have been used. The efficiency is shown for the six Level-1 thresholds: MU4, MU6, MU10 which require a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations, and MU11, MU20, MU21 with a further coincidence on the outer RPC stations. The MU20 threshold takes into account the full muon barrel region, while for the otherwise identical MU21 the new feet trigger is excluded. For this reason, the trigger efficiency is higher for MU20. The efficiency is measured using events selected by independent triggers and requiring an offline reconstructed muon. png pdf eps BC Timing for each trigger tower Fraction of the RPC High-pT trigger hits associated correctly to the collision Bunch Crossing for each Level 1 Barrel Muon trigger tower. The data is from a the pp runs at √s = 13 TeV with an integrated luminosity L=0.58 fb-1. The trigger sectors have a different number of towers: the small sectors have 6 trigger towers, the large sectors have 7 and the feet sectors have 8. The blank bin in sector 11 corresponds to a trigger tower masked in this specific run. png pdf eps BC timing fluctuations during 2017 Fraction of RPC High-pT trigger hits associated correctly to the collision Bunch Crossing for the whole RPC trigger system as a function of time. Each point corresponds to a different ATLAS run recorded in 2017. Only runs with integrated luminosity greater than 50 pb-1 have been used. In the period above day 100, corresponding to September-October 2017, two structures are observed, with the lower one with a BC fraction around 99.4%. This lower fraction with respect to the standard one of about 99.6% is due to some problems in the trigger hardware that led to a removal of part of the RPC readout (1 readout module out of 32 in total) from the data acquisition for a small period in those particular runs. png pdf eps

## Level-1 endcap muon trigger performance in 2016 and 2017: ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112 (Sep 13, 2017)

 Level-1 muon trigger efficiency at 2016 and 2017 for pT > 20 GeV (L1_MU20) Efficiency of the L1_MU20 trigger for 2016 (black) and 2017 (red) are shown as a function of the offline muon transverse momentum. The L1_MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed pT > 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is estimated by tag-and-probe method using Z→μμ events. In 2017, look-up-table in the endcap region have been optimized using 2016 data. png pdf eps Level-1 muon trigger rate at 2016 and 2017 for pT > 20 GeV (L1_MU20) Trigger rate of the L1_MU20 trigger for 2016 (black) and 2017 (red) are shown as a function of the instantaneous luminosity. The L1_MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed pT > 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. In 2017, the overlap region at the barrel feet region and look-up table in the endcap region have been optimized using 2016 data. png pdf eps

## Performance plots for Level1 Barrel Muon Trigger: ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-113 (Sep 13, 2017)

 Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -2.16 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -1.77) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system, using middle trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chamber commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU11 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -2.16 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -1.77) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT L1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chamber commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.37 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -0.98) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system, using middle trigger chambers. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chamber commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU11 trigger in 2017 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.37 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -0.98) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the Low-pT L1 muon trigger system, with a coincidence with a High-pT RPC chamber. The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, in 13 TeV data from 2017 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chamber commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png pdf eps L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for reconstructed muons with pT > 15 GeV and |η | < 1.05 as a function of transverse momentum. The efficiency is shown for the six Level-1 thresholds: MU4, MU6, MU10 which require a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations, and MU11, MU20, MU21 with a further coincidence on the outer RPC stations. MU21 threshold is equal to MU20 everywhere but in the “feet” region, where the new feet trigger does not have this threshold. The efficiency is measured using events selected by independent triggers. png pdf eps

# 2016 data

## Performance plots for Level1 Barrel Muon Trigger ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-035 (May 23, 2017)

 Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2015 (blue triangles) and in 2016 (red dots) plotted as a function of φ at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. Z → µµ events from a fully-simulated ATLAS Monte Carlo are also overlaid as reference. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV and an absolute pseudo-rapidity lower than 1.05. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system (using medium trigger chambers). The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The statistical uncertainties are typically ~0.1%. The plot shows the general stability of the system with data taking and that in some areas the efficiency has increased thanks to fixing inefficient RPC chambers in the winter shutdown between 2015 and 2016. In particular, it shows the drastic efficiency increase (about 20% absolute) in the regions of the detector support structure feet, where new trigger RPC chambers were installed and commissioned by the end of 2015. The MC simulation was tuned with real RPC strip efficiencies measured on 2015 data and is overlaid to show the expectation of 2016 detector conditions. The MC efficiency of totally inefficient strips was set to 50% to be able to rescale if a given element should be repaired in the future. png eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU11 trigger in 2015 (blue triangles) and in 2016 (red dots) plotted as a function of φ at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. Z → µµ events from a fully-simulated ATLAS Monte Carlo are also overlaid as reference. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV and an absolute pseudo-rapidity lower than 1.05. The MU11 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 11 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system (using both medium and outer trigger chambers). The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The statistical uncertainties are typically ~0.1%. The plot shows the general stability of the system with data taking and that in some areas the efficiency has increased thanks to fixing inefficient RPC chambers in the winter shutdown between 2015 and 2016. In particular, it shows the drastic efficiency increase (about 20% absolute) in the regions of the detector support structure feet, where new trigger RPC chambers were installed and commissioned by the end of 2015. The MC simulation was tuned with real RPC strip efficiencies measured on 2015 data and is overlaid to show the expectation of 2016 detector conditions. The MC efficiency of totally inefficient strips was set to 50% to be able to rescale if a given element should be repaired in the future. png eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2016 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of φ at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. It is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV and an absolute pseudo-rapidity lower than 1.05. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system (using medium trigger chambers). The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the drastic efficiency increase (about 20% absolute) introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers installed and commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the regions of the detector supporting structure feet. png eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2016 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.96 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -1.77) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system (using medium trigger chambers). The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers installed and commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector structure support feet are placed. png eps Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU10 trigger in 2016 including (in green) or excluding (yellow) the newly commissioned trigger chambers in the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is plotted as a function of η at the interaction vertex of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region, for a specific sector (corresponding to -1.17 < φ(mu at the interaction vertex) < -0.97) of the “feet” region of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement and have a transverse momentum of at least 15 GeV. The MU10 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 10 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system (using medium trigger chambers). The efficiency is measured on an inclusive sample selected using all non-muon L1 ATLAS triggers, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. The plot shows the efficiency increase across the pseudo-rapidity range in the ATLAS Barrel Region, introduced by using the new trigger RPC chambers installed and commissioned by the end of 2015 to cover the indicated φ range, corresponding to the detector support structure feet. The efficiency is also made more constant across η, instrumenting the positions where the detector support structure feet are placed. png eps

# 2015 data @ 13 TeV

## Level 1 Barrel Muon trigger and RPC performance in 2015

 RPC trigger coverage Distribution RPC trigger hits in the pivot layer associated with an high-pT trigger, shown in terms of the η and φ strip coordinates. The black lines indicate the contours of individual RPC chambers. The data set corresponds to pp collisions collected with 25 ns spacing between colliding bunches. png pdf RPC trigger coverage (in terms of strip index) Distribution RPC trigger hits in the pivot layer associated with an high-pT trigger shown in term of the strip index of η and φ strips. The black lines indicate the contour of individual RPC chambers. png pdf RPC efficiency Distribution of the measured RPC "gap efficiency" of each gas volume, defined by the presence of hits on at least one of the two strip panels (η and φ), and of the "detector efficiency" for each strip panel, defined by the presence of hits in the strip panel. The total number of panels (η + φ) is 8592, the number of gaps is 4296. The efficiency is measured using standalone RPC tracks obtained removing the hits on the unit under test. Trigger biases are removed requiring that the remaining hits satisfy the trigger coincidence. png pdf RPC dead strips Distribution of the fraction of dead strips per readout panel for both views. Dead strips can originate from different reasons, e.g. readout problems, masking of noisy channels or gas gaps disconnected from HV. The peak at 1 shows that the fraction of readout panels in which all strips are dead is approximately 2%. png pdf RPC cluster size Distribution of RPC cluster size as measured in readout hits for the η and φ strips. png pdf Average RPC cluster size per panel Distribution of average RPC cluster size for each readout panel for both the η and φ views. png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger Bunch Crossing identification Difference between the event bunch crossing (BC) number identified by the Level-1 Muon Barrel trigger and the collision bunch crossing number, for muons passing reconstructed offline with pT > 15 GeV and passing the corresponding Level-1 threshold MU15. The collision bunch crossing is identified using independent triggers. The plot shows that 99.7% of the L1 barrel events have been tagged with the correct BC number. Data from a single pp collision run at √s = 13 TeV ( Oct 31/Nov 1, LHC fill 4560). png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger timing RPC hit time distribution for trigger hits, measured from readout data (yellow histogram), and its gaussian fit (blue line). The red dotted lines identify the collision Bunch Crossing (BC). One time unit on the horizontal axis is 1/8 of a BC (3.125 ns). The horizontal axis covers the readout window in which data are collected that corresponds to 8 BCs. The plot shows that the RPC trigger hit distribution is within the collision BC, and has a sigma equal to 0.94 ticks (= 2.9 ns). png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger timing per tower Fraction of RPC trigger hits associated correctly to the collision Bunch Crossing for each of the 428 Barrel Muon trigger towers. The red contours show the new trigger towers of the “feet”-chamber upgrade that have been activated at the end of 2015 data taking and have not been yet fully commissioned. One tower with hardware problems (Tower=2, Sector=38) is visible as an orange area. The two white areas (Tower=3, Sector=23, 24, 55, 56) correspond to the “elevator” chambers, not yet commissioned in 2015. Data from pp runs at √s = 5 TeV, integrated luminosity L=28 pb-1. png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger efficiency as a function of $\eta$ L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for reconstructed muons with $p_T>15$ GeV as a function of η. The efficiency is shown for two thresholds: MU10 (pT > 10 GeV, selected with a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations) and MU11 (pT > 10 GeV selected with a further coincidence with the outer RPC stations). The dashed histograms show the results from a special MC simulation which includes measured efficiencies of the RPC chambers. The plot shows a lower trigger efficiency in regions where the detector coverage is lower due to the barrel toroid mechanical structures. The efficiency was measured using events selected by independent triggers. png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger efficiency as a function of $\phi$ L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for reconstructed muons with pT > 15 GeV as a function of φ. The efficiency is shown for two thresholds: MU10 (pT > 10 GeV, selected with a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations) and MU11 (pT > 10 GeV selected with a further coincidence with the outer RPC stations). The dashed histograms show the results from a special MC simulation which includes measured efficiencies of the RPC chambers. The regions with lower efficiency around φ = -2 and φ = -1 correspond to the “feet” structures that support the ATLAS calorimeters, in which the muon chamber coverage is reduced. The efficiency was measured using events selected by independent triggers. png pdf L1 Barrel Trigger efficiency as a function of pT L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for reconstructed muons with pT > 15 GeV and |η| < 1.05 as a function of transverse momentum. The efficiency is shown for the six Level-1 thresholds: MU4,MU6, MU10 which require a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations, and MU11,MU15,MU20 with a further coincidence on the outer RPC stations. The fitted plateau efficiency for MU10 and MU11 is also shown. The efficiency was measured using events selected by independent triggers. png pdf RPC efficiency with the Z “tag and probe” method The plot shows the distribution of the measured RPC detector efficiencies defined by the positive response of the η strips (similar to Figure 3) measured using reconstructed muons from Z → μ μ decays with the “tag-and-probe method”. png pdf

## Performance of Level1 Endcap FI coincidence in Run2:

 (top) Efficiency of Level1(L1) muon trigger with the pT threshold of 15 GeV (L1_MU15) in the region 1.3 < |η| <1.9, as a function of φ. It is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standardATLAS software and are categorized as “combined” muons with tracks in InnerDetector and MuonSpectrometer. It is measured in the Tag-and-Probe method using the Z→μμ candidate events in runs of 13 TeV data taking with 25ns LHC bunch spacing, applying 15 GeV threshold to the offline muons used as probe. Blue and red points show the efficiency [without] and [with] the FI coincidence enabled, respectively. The values “with FI coincidence” are calculated with requiring coincidence flags in the FI chambers. (bottom) Ratio of the efficiency values in the top plot: [with FI] / [without FI]. The values ( ~98% ) shows the efficiency in the same pseudo-rapidity region 1.3 < |η| < 1.9 as in the top plot, which is negligible in the total eta region. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida (top) Efficiency of L1_MU15 trigger in the endcap region, as a function of pT of offline muons. It is measured in the Tag-and-Prove method using Z→μμ events. Blue and red points show the efficiency without and with the FI coincidence enabled, respectively. (bottom) Ratio of the absolute trigger efficiency values in the top plot: [with FI] / [without FI], which shows the additional efficiency of the FI coincidence. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida (top) η distributions of Region of Interest (RoI) from the L1_MU15 trigger. The number of the entries are normalized with the integrated luminosities in the runs with and without the FI coincidence enabled. (bottom) Reduction on the trigger rate of L1_MU15, calculated in (1-N[with FI]/N[without FI], N: number of entry in each bin). The rate reductions in the regions with no FI chambers are consistent with 0 within the errors, which are computed in the statistics only. The binning for those regions are merged to reduce the visual effect from the statistical fluctuation. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida (top) η distributions of Region of Interest (RoI) from the L1 muon trigger with the pT threshold of 20 GeV (L1_MU20). The number of the entries are normalized with the integrated luminosities in the runs with and without the FI coincidence enabled. (bottom) Reduction on the trigger rate of L1_MU20, calculated in (1-N[with FI]/N[without FI], N: number of entry in each bin). The rate reductions in the regions with no FI chambers are consistent with 0 in the errors, which are computed in the statistics only. The binning for those regions are merged to reduce the visual effect from the statistical fluctuation. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida Trigger rates of the L1_MU15 in the runs with and without the FI coincidence enabled, as functions of the instantaneous luminosity of LHC. The reduction computed from the slope of the linear fitting is 15%. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida Trigger rates of the L1_MU20 in the runs with and without the FI coincidence enabled, as functions of the instantaneous luminosity of LHC. The reduction computed from the slope of the linear fitting is 21%. png pdf contact: Toshi Sumida

## Trigger rates for muon trigger for Run2: (September 23, 2015)

 The Level 1 rate for the single muon trigger with a pT threshold of 20 GeV versus instantaneous luminosity. The black (red)  points correspond to data recorded with (without) a coincidence between the FI (Forward-Inner) muon layers with the big-wheel of the muon spectrometer. This coincidence removes collision background from secondary interactions in the ATLAS Endcap toroid which produces particles that only traverse the big wheel. These background signals arrive at the big-wheel layer with a delay of approximately 25ns and therefore did not contribute significantly to the muon trigger rate during the 50ns running in Run-1 and Run-2.  The rate reduction due the coincidence is approximately 25%. png pdf contact: Philipp Fleischmann

# L1Muon Trigger : 2011-2012

## Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 Trigger: ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-033 (May 02, 2012)

 η distribution of Level-1 Regions of Interest (RoIs) passing the L1_MU10 trigger, measured in a run from 2011 and a run from 2012. Distributions are individually normalized to unit area. The large fraction at approximately η=1 is due to gamma rays from the beam penetrating through a narrow unshielded region between the barrel and endcap regions of the experiment. Additional shielding was installed in this region between 2011 and 2012 running. L1_MU10 is a trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 10GeV, requiring a coincidence of hits across three-stations in the TGC and two-stations in the RPC regions of the L1Muon trigger chambers. png eps contact: Will Buttinger η distribution of Level-1 Regions of Interest (RoIs) passing the L1_MU11 trigger, with the distribution of the subset of RoIs matched (ΔR<0.2) to an offline reconstructed muon (with a combined inner detector and muon spectrometer track and additional interaction-point parameter cuts to exclude cosmic muons, and pT at least 3 GeV), and offline reconstructed muons with a pT greater than 10 GeV. L1_MU11 is a trigger for a single muon with transverse momentum above 10GeV, requiring a coincidence of hits across three-stations in all regions of the L1Muon trigger chambers. png eps contact: Will Buttinger

## L1 Barrel Muon Trigger Efficiency 2012

### L1 Barrel Muon Trigger Efficiency with 2012 Data: ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007 (February 21, 2014)

 L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency vs. ϕ Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for the low-pT MU10 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations) and the high-pT MU11 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a further coincidence the third outer RPC stations), as a function of ϕ, and its comparison with MC data. The plot shows a lower trigger efficiency in the feet region (around ϕ = -1 and ϕ = -2) where the detector coverage is lower due to the ATLAS mechanical supports. The trigger efficiency is also lower in the small sectors than in the large ones, because of the toroid mechanical structures again affecting the detector coverage. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons of pT > 15 GeV and an independent triggers based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency vs. η Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for the low-pT MU10 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations) and the high-pT MU11 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a further coincidence the third outer RPC stations), as a function of η, and its comparison with MC data. The plot shows a lower trigger efficiency in regions where the detector coverage is lower due to the barrel toroid mechanical structures. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons of pT > 15 GeV and an independent trigger based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon trigger efficiency vs. η Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon trigger efficiency for the barrel (1.05 < η < 1.05, within the red dotted lines) and end-cap regions, as a function of η, and its comparison to MC data. The barrel low-pT MU10 threshold selects muons with pT > 10 GeV with a coincidence of the two inner RPC stations, while the high-pT MU11 threshold selects muons with pT > 10 GeV with a further coincidence the third outer RPC station. The end-cap MU10 and MU11 thresholds select muons with pT > 10 GeV with a coincidence of three TGC stations. The plot shows a lower trigger efficiency than the end-cap in some barrel regions, because of the reduced RPC detector coverage where the barrel toroid mechanical structures and the ATLAS feet supports are. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons of pT > 15 GeV and an independent trigger based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon barrel trigger turn on curves Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency as a function of pT, for the six trigger thresholds. MU4, MU6, MU10 are the low-pT thresholds (muons selected with the two inner RPC stations), while MU11, MU15, MU20 are the high-pT thresholds (low-pT muons confirmed with the third outer RPC station). The lower trigger efficiency for the three high-pT thresholds is due to the reduced RPC detector coverage in the outer planes, due to the ATLAS feet support structure. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons and an independent trigger based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency (ϕ vs. η) Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency for the high-pT MU11 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a coincidence of three RPC stations), as a function of η and ϕ. Orange and red regions represent lower trigger efficiency, due to the reduced RPC detector geometrical acceptance in the regions where there are toroid mechanical supports. The regions where there are no RPC detectors at all are marked as white. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons of pT > 10 GeV and an independent trigger based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon trigger efficiency (ϕ vs. η) Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel and end-cap trigger efficiency for the high-pT MU11 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a coincidence of three RPC stations in the barrel region, and three TGC stations in the end-cap region), as a function of eta and phi. Orange and red regions represent lower trigger efficiency, due to the reduced RPC detector geometrical acceptance in the regions where there are toroid mechanical supports. The regions where there are no RPC detectors at all are marked as white. The efficiency is measured with offline reconstructed combined muons of pT > 10 GeV and an independent trigger based on jets and missing transverse energy. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon barrel trigger Bunch Crossing identification Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. L1 muon barrel trigger Bunch Crossing number distribution for the high-pT MU11 threshold (muons with pT > 10 GeV selected with a coincidence of three RPC stations). The plot shows that 99.64% of the L1 barrel events have been tagged with the correct Bunch Crossing number. Events have been selected with all L1 muon triggers and reconstructed offline muons. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari L1 muon barrel readout Bunch Crossing identification Offline data quality monitoring - LHC fill 3203, 20-21 October 2012. RPC timing distribution for trigger hits measured from readout data as a function of time (yellow histogram), and its gaussian fit (blue line). The red dotted lines identify the collision Bunch Crossing. One time unit on the X-axis is 1/8 of a BC (3.125 ns). The plot shows that the RPC barrel hit distribution is within the collision Bunch Crossing, and has a sigma equal to 0.9 ticks (= 2.83 ns). Events have been selected with all L1 muon triggers and reconstructed offline muons. png pdf contact: Massimo Corradi, Riccardo Vari

# 2010 data @ 7 TeV

## RPC timing

 L1 RPC trigger timing Distribution of the trigger time difference of the L1 RPC trigger in units of bunch crossings (BC) with respect to the minimum bias L1 trigger for collision events containing an offline muon with | eta | <1.05, reconstructed using the muon spectrometer and inner detector data. The L1 RoI to offline matching criteria is DR<0.5. The timing window has been temporarily stretched to accept muon triggers in BC={-2,-1,0} to ensure sufficient statistics for the timing calibration with data. Shown is the calibration obtained with cosmic radiation (black) and the first calibration obtained with collision data (red). jpg pdf L1 RPC low-pt trigger timing Bunch-Crossing (BC) distribution of the RPC low-pt trigger, from any trigger sector, with respect to the L1A BC trigger before and after a calibration with pp data. The blue dotted line represent the BC distribution obtained after calibration with cosmic data. png eps L1 RPC high-pt trigger timing Bunch-Crossing (BC) distribution of the RPC high-pt trigger, from any trigger sector, with respect to the RPC low-pt trigger before and after calibration with pp data. png eps

## TGC phase scan

 TGC Clock Phase Scan The plot shows the fraction of the TGC hits in the bunch crossing before the colliding bunch as a function of the clock phase shift of the TGC, from which the optimal delay time for the opening gate can be determined. The numerator is the TGC hits in BC={-1}, the denominator is the sum of the TGC hits in BC={-1,0,1} relative to the colliding bunch. A transverse momentum of offline combined muon of greater 5 GeV/c is required. The optimal timing is between -1 nsec and -2 nsec. An adjustment in the TGC timing of -4 nsec is chosen to have a sufficient margin to cover the fluctuation of fiber length between LHC and ATLAS by the variation in temperature. jpg pdf

## RPC and TGC rates

 Result of a clock fine delay scan between the Muon-to-CTP-Interface (MUCTPI) and the sector logic modules of the muon trigger detectors (RPC and TGC). The test indirectly measures the relative phase between the incoming muon trigger sector data and the MUCTPI clock. This phase relationship needs to be known in order to safely strobe the incoming data without any errors. The result shows that with the current operating point (MUCTPI clock fine delay setting of 3ns), the signals are strobed correctly with no errors and with timing margins of more than +/- 5ns for all 208 sectors. Test procedure: the phase of the MUCTPI clock that strobes the incoming muon sector data is shifted by 0.5ns steps over the full 25ns range, while the sector logic modules are sending a known repetitive test pattern. For each delay step, the data transmission is checked using diagnostics memories. The number of sectors with at least one error is shown in the histogram per delay setting. These delay settings with transmission errors, which need to be avoided, cluster far away from the current operating point (delay setting of 3ns) with margins of more than +/- 5ns. png png Rate of each of the RPC (centre lines) and TGC (left and right disks) sectors. Taken during a run of stable beams, the eight-fold structure of the muon detector can be seen in the RPC, this is harder to see in the TGC due to limited statistics. The numbers on the blue/purple coloured background show the MIOCT slot numbers, showing how these are linked between TGC and RPC. png RPC and TGC rates as a function of transverse momentum threshold Shows the rate as a function of PT threshold (y-axis) for each sector (x-axis). The first 4 sectors correspond to the RPC, any gaps appear due to limited statistics. Each threshold can have 2 candidates and there is also a total. The remaining sectors are for the TGC, where the 4th trigger threshold was not being used. Each plot is one MIOCT board (its slot number gives the position of the detector inputs, as shown in the above plot) and all inputs report similar rates. png

-- JoergStelzer - 13-Jun-2011 Responsible: JoergStelzer
Subject: public

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-033-fig10.eps r1 manage 13.3 K 2012-05-31 - 16:20 WillButtinger
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-033-fig10.png r1 manage 17.8 K 2012-05-31 - 16:20 WillButtinger
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-033-fig9.eps r1 manage 12.3 K 2012-05-31 - 16:20 WillButtinger
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-033-fig9.png r1 manage 13.2 K 2012-05-31 - 16:20 WillButtinger
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig1.pdf r1 manage 112.5 K 2014-02-21 - 20:07 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig1.png r1 manage 834.0 K 2014-02-21 - 20:17 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig2.pdf r1 manage 116.0 K 2014-02-21 - 20:22 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig2.png r1 manage 840.2 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig3.pdf r1 manage 120.1 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig3.png r1 manage 868.1 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig4.pdf r1 manage 57.4 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig4.png r1 manage 209.9 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig5.pdf r1 manage 75.2 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig5.png r1 manage 157.0 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig6.pdf r1 manage 90.5 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig6.png r1 manage 200.8 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig7.pdf r1 manage 57.0 K 2014-02-21 - 20:24 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig7.png r1 manage 130.5 K 2014-02-21 - 20:26 RiccardoVari
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig8.pdf r1 manage 73.7 K 2014-02-21 - 20:26 RiccardoVari
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-007-fig8.png r1 manage 143.9 K 2014-02-21 - 20:26 RiccardoVari
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig1a.eps r1 manage 38.0 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig1a.png r1 manage 25.1 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig1b.eps r1 manage 45.1 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig1b.png r1 manage 25.6 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig2.eps r1 manage 17.1 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig2.png r1 manage 36.5 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig3.eps r1 manage 10.1 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig3.png r1 manage 19.2 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig4.eps r1 manage 24.4 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2014-010-fig4.png r1 manage 28.0 K 2014-03-07 - 15:20 YasuyukiHorii
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig1a.eps r1 manage 27.4 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig1a.png r1 manage 21.4 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig1b.eps r1 manage 25.9 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig1b.png r1 manage 21.5 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig2.eps r1 manage 10.9 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig2.png r1 manage 18.0 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig3.eps r1 manage 12.4 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-142-fig3.png r1 manage 24.5 K 2015-09-20 - 04:20 TomoeKishimoto
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig1.pdf r1 manage 26.4 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig1.png r1 manage 40.1 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig2.pdf r1 manage 18.9 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig2.png r1 manage 30.5 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig3.pdf r1 manage 17.9 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig3.png r1 manage 29.7 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig4.pdf r1 manage 18.3 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig4.png r1 manage 30.6 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig5.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig5.png r1 manage 44.5 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig6.pdf r1 manage 14.9 K 2015-11-30 - 17:48 MasatoAoki
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-201-fig6.png r1 manage 46.3 K 2015-11-30 - 17:49 MasatoAoki
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig1.pdf r1 manage 34.7 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig1.png r1 manage 282.5 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig2.pdf r1 manage 30.2 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig2.png r1 manage 274.5 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig3.pdf r1 manage 34.1 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig3.png r1 manage 489.6 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig4.pdf r1 manage 29.4 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig4.png r1 manage 307.2 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig5.pdf r1 manage 29.2 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig5.png r1 manage 271.2 K 2016-12-12 - 19:39 MasayaIshino
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig6.pdf r1 manage 28.4 K 2016-12-12 - 19:40 MasayaIshino
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2015-205-fig6.png r1 manage 306.6 K 2016-12-12 - 19:40 MasayaIshino
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1a.eps r1 manage 19.4 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1a.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1a.png r1 manage 18.0 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1b.eps r1 manage 16.9 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1b.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig1b.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig2.eps r1 manage 13.3 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig2.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig2.png r1 manage 20.7 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig3.eps r1 manage 16.8 K 2017-05-07 - 13:12 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig3.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2017-05-07 - 13:13 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-022-fig3.png r1 manage 26.3 K 2017-05-07 - 13:13 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-1.eps r1 manage 18.2 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-1.pdf r1 manage 18.4 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-1.png r1 manage 21.8 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-2.eps r1 manage 12.8 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-2.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-112-2.png r1 manage 20.7 K 2017-09-15 - 15:28 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU10.eps r1 manage 9.5 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU10.pdf r1 manage 44.3 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU10.png r1 manage 7.6 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU11.eps r1 manage 9.5 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU11.pdf r1 manage 44.3 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-1D_eff_17_16_MU11.png r1 manage 7.6 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-BCtiming.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-BCtiming.pdf r1 manage 336.4 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-BCtiming.png r1 manage 28.2 K 2018-02-18 - 20:18 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU10.eps r1 manage 40.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU10.pdf r1 manage 466.8 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU10.png r1 manage 32.1 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU11.eps r1 manage 41.9 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU11.pdf r1 manage 465.3 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-effratio_2017over2016_MU11.png r1 manage 34.5 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-plateaueff_vs_days.eps r1 manage 23.3 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-plateaueff_vs_days.pdf r1 manage 55.2 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-plateaueff_vs_days.png r1 manage 27.8 K 2018-02-18 - 20:20 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu10.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu10.pdf r1 manage 219.4 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu10.png r1 manage 18.7 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu11.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu11.pdf r1 manage 197.8 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector12_mu11.png r1 manage 19.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu10.eps r1 manage 19.9 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu10.pdf r1 manage 223.1 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu10.png r1 manage 18.9 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu11.eps r1 manage 19.9 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu11.pdf r1 manage 195.0 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-sector14_mu11.png r1 manage 19.1 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-time_vs_days.eps r1 manage 23.2 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-time_vs_days.pdf r1 manage 58.2 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-time_vs_days.png r1 manage 11.8 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-turnon.eps r1 manage 15.5 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-turnon.pdf r1 manage 60.1 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-008-turnon.png r1 manage 23.2 K 2018-02-18 - 20:21 JoergStelzer
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig1.eps r1 manage 24.1 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig1.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig1.png r1 manage 14.8 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
eps ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig2.eps r1 manage 75.5 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
pdf ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig2.pdf r1 manage 43.4 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
png ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-033-fig2.png r1 manage 23.5 K 2018-05-28 - 04:43 JumpeiMaeda
eps LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_MU10.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
pdf LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_MU10.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
eps LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_MU11.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
pdf LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_MU11.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
png LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_mu10.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
png LHCC_Sep2017_sec12_mu11.png r1 manage 14.1 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
eps LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_MU10.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
pdf LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_MU10.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
eps LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_MU11.eps r1 manage 20.0 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
pdf LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_MU11.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
png LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_mu10.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2017-09-13 - 20:51 LidiaDellAsta
png LHCC_Sep2017_sec14_mu11.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
eps LHCC_Sep2017_turn_on_2017.eps r1 manage 15.2 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
pdf LHCC_Sep2017_turn_on_2017.pdf r1 manage 17.3 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
png LHCC_Sep2017_turn_on_2017.png r1 manage 18.6 K 2017-09-13 - 21:10 LidiaDellAsta
gz atl-com-daq-2015-205.tar.gz r1 manage 1084.1 K 2016-12-13 - 16:31 MasayaIshino
eps eff_th3_allsec.eps r1 manage 14.2 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
pdf eff_th3_allsec.pdf r1 manage 14.4 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
png eff_th3_allsec.png r1 manage 52.7 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
eps eff_th3_sec12.eps r1 manage 19.9 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
pdf eff_th3_sec12.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
png eff_th3_sec12.png r1 manage 50.7 K 2017-05-23 - 12:48 LidiaDellAsta
eps eff_th3_sec14.eps r1 manage 19.9 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
pdf eff_th3_sec14.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
png eff_th3_sec14.png r1 manage 50.3 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_01.pdf r1 manage 38.2 K 2016-02-19 - 17:50 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_01.png r1 manage 31.1 K 2016-02-19 - 17:50 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_02.pdf r1 manage 39.6 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_02.png r1 manage 50.2 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_03.pdf r1 manage 19.7 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_03.png r1 manage 21.5 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_04.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_04.png r1 manage 13.1 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_05.pdf r1 manage 18.8 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_05.png r1 manage 15.6 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_06.pdf r1 manage 19.6 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_06.png r1 manage 15.9 K 2016-02-19 - 17:55 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_07.pdf r1 manage 14.4 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_07.png r1 manage 17.2 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_08.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_08.png r1 manage 20.0 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_09.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.6 K 2016-02-19 - 20:49 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_09.png r2 r1 manage 17.1 K 2016-02-19 - 20:50 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_10.pdf r1 manage 18.7 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_10.png r1 manage 49.3 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_11.pdf r1 manage 17.6 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_11.png r1 manage 47.3 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_12.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_12.png r1 manage 19.3 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf fig_13.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
png fig_13.png r1 manage 12.6 K 2016-02-19 - 17:56 LidiaDellAsta
pdf mu20tbp_vs_lumi.pdf r1 manage 217.2 K 2015-11-11 - 11:48 DavidMStrom
png mu20tbp_vs_lumi.png r1 manage 139.1 K 2015-11-11 - 11:48 DavidMStrom
eps phiHi.eps r1 manage 14.3 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
pdf phiHi.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
png phiHi.png r1 manage 74.0 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
eps phiLow.eps r1 manage 14.4 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
pdf phiLow.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
png phiLow.png r1 manage 70.5 K 2017-05-23 - 12:49 LidiaDellAsta
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version |  | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r30 - 2018-05-28 - JumpeiMaeda

 Account
 Cern Search TWiki Search Google Search Atlas All webs Edit Attach
Copyright &© 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback