MuonTriggerPublicResults < AtlasPublic

%ATLASPUBLICHEADER%

---+!! <nop>Muon Trigger Public Results
%TOC%     <!--optional-->
%STARTINCLUDE%

---+Introduction

Approved plots that can be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences and similar events. *Please do not add figures on your own.* Contact the responsible project leader in case of questions and/or suggestions. Follow the guidelines on the [[TriggerPublicResults#Guidelines][trigger public results]] page.

---+CONF notes

---++ CONF note on muon trigger performances in 2011 (7 !TeV)

   * Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in 2011  [[https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2012-099/][ATLAS-CONF-2012-099]]

---++ CONF note on muon trigger performances in 2010 (7 !TeV)

   * Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in p-p collisions at &radic;s = 7 !TeV [[https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2010-095/][ATLAS-CONF-2010-095]]

---++ CONF note on muon trigger performances in 2009 and 2010 (900 !GeV and cosmic data)

   * ATLAS Muon Trigger Performance in cosmic rays and pp collisions at &radic;s = 900 !GeV [[https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2010-013/][ATLAS-CONF-2010-013]]

---+ Plots for Upgrade (higher luminosity/energy) studies

---++ Level-1 muon trigger rate extrapolation to 14 TeV

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Estimation of muon level-1 trigger rate extrapolated for sqrt(s)=14 TeV by emulating impact of new small wheel detector </b><br>
Estimation of ATLAS muon level-1 trigger rate extrapolated for pp collisions at &#8730;s=14 TeV with instantaneous luminosity of L=10<sup>34</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>, shown as a function of p<sub>T</sub> threshold. The extrapolation uses measured rates at &#8730;s=7 TeV both at L=0.3•10<sup>34</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup> and also with 25 ns bunch spacing in 2011 runs where the muon level-1 trigger rate was observed to be about 40% higher compared to 50 ns bunch spacing runs. To extrapolate from 7 TeV to 14 TeV, transfer factors were separately applied for non-fake and fake components (1.9±0.1 and 1.3±0.3 respectively) which are disentangled by means of presence of offline reconstructed muon track. The yellow band guides uncertainty due to the transfer factors.
Also shown is an extrapolation with the new small wheel (NSW) planned for ATLAS Phase 1 upgrade. The impact of NSW requirements in trigger was emulated by using 2011 data, separately for non-fake and fake components. They are shown only for p<sub>T</sub>=20 GeV and higher thresholds.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="NSWRate.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/NSWRate.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/NSWRate.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---+ !L2MuonSA Endcap pT Resolution Improvement

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Fraction residuals of inverse p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Fractional residual of inverse-p<sub>T</sub>, (1/p<sub>T</sub>,FastMuonSA &#8722; 1/p<sub>T</sub>,offline)/(1/p<sub>T</sub>,offline), is shown where p<sub>T</sub>,FastMuonSA is the transverse momentum (p<sub>T</sub>) reconstructed by the fast muon stand-alone trigger algorithm (!FastMuonSA) and p<sub>T</sub>,offline is the p<sub>T</sub> given by the offline reconstruction. Both the cases where the hits in the CSC chamber are used (blue) and not used (red) in the !FastMuonSA are shown. The results were obtained by rerunning !FastMuonSA on the 2016 data. The offline reconstructed muons that passed the muon trigger with the threshold of 4 !GeV were considered in the results. Ranges of the offline muon p<sub>T</sub> are written in each plot. The CSC coverage in |&#951;<sub>RoI</sub>| is between 2.0 and 2.4, only muons reconstructed in this region by !FastMuonSA are considered in this figure. In all p<sub>T</sub>,offline ranges, the 1/p<sub>T</sub> resolution is better when including hits from the CSCs.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="slices_6_2.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/slices_6_2.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/slices_6_2.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/slices_6_2.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/slices_6_2.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Inverse  p<sub>T</sub> resolution </b><br>
Resolution of the inverse-p<sub>T</sub> by the fast muon stand-alone trigger algorithm (!FastMuonSA) is shown as a function of the offline muon p<sub>T</sub>. The resolution is extracted by taking the &#963; of a Gaussian fit to the distribution of the fractional residual of inverse-p<sub>T</sub>, i.e. (1/p<sub>T</sub>,FastMuonSA &#8722; 1/p<sub>T</sub>,offline)/(1/p<sub>T</sub>,offline). The blue triangles show the resolution when !FastMuonSA uses hits from CSC chambers, and the red circles show that when !FastMuonSA does not use hits from CSC chambers. The results were obtained by rerunning !FastMuonSA on the 2016 data. The offline reconstructed muons that passed the muon trigger with the threshold of 4 !GeV were considered in the results. The CSC coverage in <br>|&#951;<sub>RoI</sub>| is between 2.0 and 2.4, only muons reconstructed in this region by !FastMuonSA are considered in this figure. The 1/p<sub>T</sub> resolution is improved when using the CSC hits in all p<sub>T</sub>,offline regions.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ptec_6_2.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/ptec_6_2.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/ptec_6_2.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/ptec_6_2.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/ptec_6_2.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>


---+ Plots for 2018 data @ 13 TeV

---++ Muon trigger performances in 2018 (approved plots for LHCC 2018) [[https://cds.cern.ch/record/2318500][ATL-COM-DAQ-2018-047]] (May 16, 2018)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594;  &#956;&#956; candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27 GeV and the barrel with |&#951;|< 1.05. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; &#956;&#956; candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV and the endcap with 1.05 <|&#951;|< 2.4. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon. The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2018. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>


---+ Plots for 2017 data @ 13 TeV

---++ Muon trigger performances in 2017 (approved plots for RBB 2017) [[https://cds.cern.ch/record/2288150/][ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-142]] (Oct 19, 2017)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV and the barrel with |&eta;|< 1.05.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV and the endcaps with 1.05 < |&eta;| < 2.4.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &eta;  </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &eta; of offline muon candidates. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---++ Muon trigger performances in early 2017 (approved plots for EPS 2017) [[https://cds.cern.ch/record/2271751/][ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-059]] (Jul 3, 2017)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV and the barrel with |&eta;|< 1.05.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV and the endcaps with 1.05 < |&eta;| < 2.4.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &eta;  </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu60 High Level Triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &eta; of offline muon candidates. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region with p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and requires that a candidate satisfied a 26 GeV HLT threshold and passed a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The mu60 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and requires that a candidate satisfied a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 60 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2017. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---+ Plots for 2016 data @ 13 TeV

---++ Muon trigger performances in 2016 (approved plots for LHCC 2017) [[https://cds.cern.ch/record/2242824/][ATL-COM-DAQ-2017-005]] (Feb 10, 2017)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region above p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event in the barrel detector region.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region above p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &phi; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &phi; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region above p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of the number of reconstructed vertices in the event in the endcap detector regions.
The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region above p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &eta;  </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR of mu26_ivarmedium with mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &eta; of offline muon candidates. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The selection is restricted to the plateau region above p<sub>T</sub> > 27GeV.
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system.
The mu26_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 26 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.
The mu50 trigger is seeded by MU20 at L1 and is required to satisfy a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 50 GeV.
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;
Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---++ Rate reduction by 2016 EI/FI-coincidence of Level-1 Endcap Muon Trigger
<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Pseudo-rapidity (&eta;) distributions of the L1 muon trigger with and without EI/FI coincidence </b><br>
The pseudo-rapidity (&eta;) distributions of the L1 muon trigger with the p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 20 GeV (L1_MU20) and the rate reduction effect by a coincidence with Small-Wheel TGCs which consist of Endcap Inner (EI) and Forward Inner (FI) chambers are shown, using events taken by a lower threshold L1 trigger (L1_MU11) in 2016. In this sample, the EI/FI coincidence decision made online was not applied however it is recorded as a flag. The region at |&eta;|~1.5 where no rate reduction seen is because that the coincidence is not required due to the inactive region of FI chambers. Moreover, the coincidence around |&eta;|~1.2 was intentionally not applied for the commissioning of the Tile-Muon coincidence [CERN-LHCC-2013-018].  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="FI-coin.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/FI-coin.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/FI-coin.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/FI-coin.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---++ Level1 muon trigger performance in the EndCaps (2 vs 3 station coincidence)
<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1_MU4 efficiency as a function of p<sub>T,&mu;</sub> (3 stations) </b><br>
&#65532;&#65532;L1_MU4 efficiency as a function of transverse momentum of offline muon (p<sub>T,&mu;</sub>) in the endcap region (|&eta;|>1.05) where Thin Gap Chambers (TGC) are utilized, for Monte Carlo simulation (green) and data (red), as well as the ratio of those (blue). The efficiency is estimated by Tag-and-Probe method using J/&psi;&rarr;&mu;&mu; events. In this data period for L1_MU4 trigger, TGC hits coincidence was required among 3 stations except for some regions in the (R,&eta;) plane. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.jpg" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.jpg"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1_MU4 efficiency as a function of p<sub>T,&mu;</sub> (2 and 3 stations) </b><br>
&#65532;&#65532;L1_MU4 efficiency as a function of transverse momentum of offline muon (p<sub>T,&mu;</sub>) in the endcap region (|&eta;|>1.05) where Thin Gap Chambers (TGC) are utilized. The efficiencies are shown for two different data sets taken with different TGC hits coincidence requirement: 2 stations coincidence (black) and 3 stations coincidence except for some regions in the (R,&eta;) plane (red). The amount of data corresponds to 1.6 fb<sup>-1</sup> for each. Also, the ratio (blue) between the two efficiencies is shown in the plot underneath. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.jpg" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.jpg"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Trigger cross section for 2 and 3 stations coincidence </b><br>
&#65532;&#65532;Trigger cross-section of L1_2MU4 (black), L1_MU6_2MU4 (blue), and L1_3MU4 (magenta) are shown as a function of the average number of interactions per LHC bunch crossing, where L1_2MU4 requires two L1 muons with p<sub>T</sub> &geq; 4 GeV, L1_MU6_2MU4 requires two L1 muons with p<sub>T</sub> &geq; 6,4 GeV, and L1_3MU4 requires three L1 muons with p<sub>T</sub> &geq; 4 GeV. The cross sections are shown for two different data sets taken with different TGC hits coincidence requirement: 2 stations coincidence (dashed lines) and 3 stations coincidence except for some regions in the (R,&eta;) plane (markers).
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.jpg" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.jpg"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.pdf][pdf]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---++ Muon trigger performances in early 2016 (approved plots for LHCC)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> in 2015 and 2016 </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger in 2015 (black) and in 2016 (red) &#8232;plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. &#8232;The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; in 2015 and 2016 </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger in 2015 (black) and in 2016 (red) &#8232;plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. &#8232;The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> in 2015 and 2016 </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger in 2015 (black) and in 2016 (red) &#8232;plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. &#8232;The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; in 2015 and 2016 </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger in 2015 (black) and in 2016 (red) &#8232;plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. &#8232;The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#951; in 2015 and 2016 </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger in 2015 (black) and in 2016 (red) &#8232;plotted as a function of &#951; of offline muon candidates. &#8232;The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2015 and 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>



<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of mu24_ivarmedium High Level trigger (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu24_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 24 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.  The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of mu24_ivarmedium High Level trigger (HLT) plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu24_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 24 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.  The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of mu24_ivarmedium High Level trigger (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu24_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 24 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.  The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of mu24_ivarmedium High Level trigger (HLT) plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu24_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 24 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.  The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#951; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU20 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of mu24_ivarmedium High Level trigger (HLT) plotted as a function of &#951; of offline muon candidates. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline isolated muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU20 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 20 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu24_ivarmedium trigger is seeded by the MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 24 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a medium isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT within a cone with a variable size which depends on the pT of the muon.  The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data from 2016 with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. &#8232;Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---+ Plots for 2015 data @ 13 TeV

---++ Muon trigger performances in 2015 25ns data-taking period 

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR combination of mu20_iloose and mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20_iloose trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. 
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Barrel muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR combination of mu20_iloose and mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the barrel detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20_iloose trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. 
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR combination of mu20_iloose and mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of p<sub>T</sub> of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20_iloose trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. 
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#966; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR combination of mu20_iloose and mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &#966; of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector regions. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20_iloose trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. 
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon &#951; </b><br>
Absolute efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and absolute and relative efficiencies of the OR combination of mu20_iloose and mu50 High Level triggers (HLT) plotted as a function of &#951; of offline muon candidates. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. 
The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20_iloose trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. 
The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with Z &#8594; µµ candidates, with no background subtraction applied, in 13 TeV data with 25 ns LHC bunch spacing. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.png" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.png"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.png][png]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---++ Muon trigger performances in 2015 50ns data-taking period (approved plots for Lepton-Photon 2015)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon pT </b><br>
Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and mu20 iloose L1MU15 or mu50 High Level triggers (HLT)  plotted as a function of pT  of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20 iloose L1MU15 trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with
Z &#8594;  µµ candidates in 13 TeV data with 50 ns LHC bunch spacing, with no background subtraction applied. The HLT efficiency is measured with respect to the offline candidates that pass the L1 trigger. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.jpg" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.jpg"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.jpg][jpg]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>



<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Endcap muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon phi </b><br>
Efficiency of Level 1 (L1) MU15 trigger and mu20 iloose L1MU15 or mu50 High Level triggers (HLT)  plotted as a function of &#966;  of offline muon candidates in the endcap detector region. The efficiency is computed with respect to offline muon candidates which are reconstructed using standard ATLAS software and are required to pass “Medium” quality requirement. The MU15 trigger requires that a candidate passed the 15 GeV threshold requirement of the L1 muon trigger system. The mu20 iloose L1MU15 trigger is seeded by the MU15 trigger and is required to satisfy a 20 GeV HLT threshold and to pass a loose isolation selection computed using inner detector tracks reconstructed online by the HLT. The mu50 trigger is seeded by the L1 MU20 trigger and is required to satisfy a 50 GeV HLT threshold. The efficiency is measured using a tag-and-probe method with
Z &#8594;  µµ candidates in 13 TeV data with 50 ns LHC bunch spacing, with no background subtraction applied. The HLT efficiency is measured with respect to the offline candidates that pass the L1 trigger. Only statistical data uncertainties are shown.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.jpg" src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.jpg"/><br>
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.jpg][jpg]]
[[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults/LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---+ Plots for 2012 data @ 8 TeV

---++ Muon trigger performances in 2012 (approved plots for CHEP 2013)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger rate at L1 </b><br>
This plot shows the trigger rate in kHz as a function of luminosity for several level-1 (L1) triggers taken during one LHC fill in 2012.
This includes two high-<i>p<sub>T</sub></i> single muon triggers (L1_MU15 and L1_MU20) as well as a three-muon trigger (L1_3MU4) and a two-muon
trigger (L1_2MU10). L1 muon classifies candidates into six programmable <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> thresholds: L1 MU4, L1 MU6, L1 MU10, L1 MU11, L1 MU15
and L1 MU20, where the number after L1 MU denotes the <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> threshold in GeV for which the coincidence logic has been optimized. It can be
seen that the trigger rate scales linearly as a function of luminosity.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_rate_L1.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_rate_L1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_L1.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_L1.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_L1.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Muon trigger rate at EF </b><br>
This plot shows the trigger rate in Hz as a function of luminosity for several event-filter (EF) triggers taken during one LHC fill in 2012.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner
detector tracks. EF_mu36_tight is a single muon trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut.
EF_mu40_MSonly_barrel_tight is a single muon trigger based only on muon-spectrometer reconstruction. It is active only in the barrel region,
and applies <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 40 GeV. EF_2mu13 requires two or more muon candidates, each of which passes a single muon trigger with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 13 GeV.
EF_mu18_mu8_FS requires at least one muon candidate which passes a single muon trigger with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 18 GeV, and subsequently employs the
full scan algorithm to find two or more muon candidates with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 18 and 8 GeV for leading and sub-leading muons. EF_3mu6 requires at
least three muon candidates each of which passes a single muon trigger with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 6 GeV.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_rate_EF.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_rate_EF.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_EF.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_EF.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_EF.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> EF muon trigger rate component </b><br>
This plot shows the rate in Hz at the Event Filter (EF) for isolated single muon trigger at an instantaneous luminosity of 1034 cm<sup>&#8208;2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> as a
function of the muon <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> threshold at the EF. The ATLAS operating point used in 2012 is mu24i trigger which corresponds to the leftmost
point in this figure. The other points were emulated by using the data recorded with mu24i trigger. Also, the expected rate contributions from
<i>W</i>-boson production and <i>Z</i>-boson production using MC scaled with the predicted cross-section are shown. It can be seen that the
contribution due to <i>W</i> and <i>Z</i> is approximately half of that observed in data at the mu24i operating point while with a threshold of
<i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 40 GeV, the <i>W</i> and <i>Z</i> contribution begins to dominate.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_rate_component_pt.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_rate_component_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_component_pt.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_component_pt.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_rate_component_pt.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the primary single muon trigger -barrel region- </b><br>
Efficiency of the two single muon triggers, mu24i_tight and mu36_tight, convolved as an OR between the two. The mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger
requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The mu36_tight is a single muon
trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured with respect to the offline reconstructed
muons in the barrel region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;| &lt; 1.05. It was measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced
events with the tag-and-probe method. Both data and Monte Carlo simulation results are shown. Error bars include both statistical and systematic
uncertainties. The net efficiency of the triggers, i.e. the efficiency passing all L1, L2 and EF selections, is shown. The plateau region is observed to have a
very sharp turn-on around 25 GeV with an efficiency in the plateau of approximately 70%.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the primary single muon trigger -endcap region- </b><br>
Efficiency of the two single muon triggers, mu24i_tight and mu36_tight, convolved as an OR between the two. The mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger
requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The mu36_tight is a single muon
trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured with respect to the offline reconstructed
muons in the endcap region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;| &gt; 1.05. It was measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced
events with the tag-and-probe method. Both data and Monte Carlo simulation results are shown. Error bars include both statistical and systematic
uncertainties. The net efficiency of the triggers, i.e. the efficiency passing all L1, L2 and EF selections, is shown. The plateau region is observed to have a
very sharp turn-on around 25 GeV with an efficiency in the plateau of approximately 86%.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the primary single muon trigger separately for L1, L2, EF -barrel region, data- </b><br>
Efficiency of the two single muon triggers, mu24i_tight and mu36_tight, convolved as an OR between the two. The mu24i_tight is a single
muon trigger requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The
mu36_tight is a single muon trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured
with respect to the offline reconstructed muons in the barrel region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;|
&lt; 1.05. It was measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced events with the tag-and-probe method. Both data and Monte Carlo simulation results are
shown. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties only. The efficiencies are shown separately for L1 (written as “Level 1”), L1+L2 (written
as “Level 2”) and L1+L2+EF (written as “Event Filter”) stages. The L1 threshold for these triggers is L1_MU15. It can be seen that the
efficiency turn-on becomes sharper with each successive trigger level. The plateau efficiency is dominated by L1, where the HLT efficiency
with respect to L1 is about 98%.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the primary single muon trigger separately for L1, L2, EF -endcap region, data- </b><br>
Efficiency of the two single muon triggers, mu24i_tight and mu36_tight, convolved as an OR between the two. The mu24i_tight is a single
muon trigger requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The
mu36_tight is a single muon trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured
with respect to the offline reconstructed muons in the endcap region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;|
&gt; 1.05. It was measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced events with the tag-and-probe method. Both data and Monte Carlo simulation results are
shown. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties only. The efficiencies are shown separately for L1 (written as “Level 1”), L1+L2 (written
as “Level 2”) and L1+L2+EF (written as “Event Filter”) stages. The L1 threshold for these triggers is L1_MU15. It can be seen that the
efficiency turn-on becomes sharper with each successive trigger level. The plateau efficiency is dominated by L1, where the HLT efficiency
with respect to L1 is about 98%.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the middle-<i>p<sub>T</sub></i> single muon triggers -barrel region, data- </b><br>
Efficiency of the single muon triggers, mu13, mu18_tight, mu24i_tight, mu36_tight and mu40_MSonly_barrel_tight. The mu24i_tight is a single
muon trigger requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The mu36_tight
is a single muon trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured with respect to
the offline reconstructed muons in the barrel region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;| &lt; 1.05. It was
measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced events with the tag-and-probe method. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties only. The different
plateau efficiency for EF_mu13 compared to the others come from EF_mu13 being seeded by L1_MU10 while the others are seeded from
L1_MU15. The L1_MU10 trigger only requires hits in two RPC stations while L1_MU15 requires hits in all three RPC stations.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of the middle-<i>p<sub>T</sub></i> single muon triggers -endcap region, data- </b><br>
Efficiency of the single muon triggers, mu13, mu18_tight, mu24i_tight, mu36_tight and mu40_MSonly_barrel_tight. The mu24i_tight is a single
muon trigger requiring at least one isolated muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 24 GeV where isolation criterion is made with inner detector tracks. The mu36_tight
is a single muon trigger requiring at least one muon with <i>p<sub>T</sub></i> &gt; 36 GeV without applying isolation cut. The efficiency is measured with respect to
the offline reconstructed muons in the endcap region which is defined as the pseudo rapidity of the offline muon satisfies |&eta;| &gt; 1.05. It was
measured by using <i>Z</i>-boson produced events with the tag-and-probe method. Error bars indicate statistical uncertainties only. Each trigger is
observed to have a similar plateau efficiency.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.eps][eps]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.pdf][pdf]]
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.jpg][jpg]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>


---++ Muon trigger performances in 2012 (approved plots for ICHEP 2012)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of single isolated muon trigger as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> (barrel) </b><br>
Efficiency of the trigger EF_mu24i_tight with respect to offline reconstructed isolated muons as a
function of p<sub>T</sub> for the barrel region.
The efficiencies includes the geometric acceptance of the L1 trigger chambers.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies.
Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1. The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 5.56 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_pt.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_pt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of single isolated muon trigger efficiency as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> (endcap) </b><br>
Efficiency of the trigger EF_mu24i_tight with respect to offline reconstructed isolated muons as a
function of p<sub>T</sub> for the endcap region.
The efficiencies includes the geometric acceptance of the L1 trigger chambers.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies.
Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1. The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 5.56 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_pt.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_pt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Single isolated muon trigger efficiency as a function of number of interactions per bunch crossing  (barrel) </b><br>
Efficiency of the trigger EF_mu24i_tight with respect to offline reconstructed isolated muons as a function of <&#956;>,
average number of interactions per bunch crossing, for the barrel region.
The efficiencies includes the geometric acceptance of the L1 trigger chambers.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies. Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1. 
The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 5.56 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_vs_mu.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Single isolated muon trigger efficiency as a function of number of interactions per bunch crossing (endcap) </b><br>
Efficiency of the trigger EF_mu24i_tight with respect to offline reconstructed isolated muons as a function of <&#956;>,
average number of interactions per bunch crossing, for the endcap region.
The efficiencies includes the geometric acceptance of the L1 trigger chambers.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies. Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1. 
The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 5.56 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_vs_mu.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> HLT efficiency of single isolated muon trigger separately for the inside-out alone, outside-in alone, and the unified approaches (barrel) </b><br>
HLT trigger efficiency w.r.t. offline reconstructed isolated muons passing the L1 trigger in the barrel region.
The blue distribution refers to the EF_mu24i_tight chain, which runs first the EF_mu24i_tight outside-in algorithm and, if it failed, 
the EF_mu24i_tight inside-out algorithm. During 2011 data taking only the one-algo-only algorithms were included in the trigger menu.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies. Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1.
The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds to 0.74 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> HLT efficiency of single isolated muon trigger separately for the inside-out alone, outside-in alone, and the unified approaches (endcap) </b><br>
HLT trigger efficiency w.r.t. offline reconstructed isolated muons passing the L1 trigger in the endcap region.
The blue distribution refers to the EF_mu24i_tight chain, which runs first the EF_mu24i_tight outside-in algorithm and, if it failed, 
the EF_mu24i_tight inside-out algorithm. During 2011 data taking only the one-algo-only algorithms were included in the trigger menu.
EF_mu24i_tight is a single muon trigger seeded by L1_MU15, which applies isolation requirements and a p<sub>T</sub> threshold of 24 GeV at the Event Filter.
The tag-and-probe method with Z&#8594;&#956;+&#956;- events was used to derive efficiencies. Offline muons are required to satisfy the isolation requirement &#931;pT/pT < 0.1.
The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds to 0.74 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of trigger isolation requirement as a function of muon p<sub>T</sub> </b><br>
EF isolated muon trigger efficiency with respect to the offline isolated muons from Z decays as a function of p<sub>T</sub>.
The track isolation variable (&#931;pT) is defined as the sum of the p<sub>T</sub> of tracks having p<sub>T</sub> > 1 GeV found in the ID in a cone of &#916;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate, 
after subtracting the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The circles show the relative efficiency with the relative track isolation cut at 0.12.
The efficiency does not include the efficiencies of the previous steps of the isolated trigger chain. The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 3.79 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_isoeff_pt.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_isoeff_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_isoeff_pt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Efficiency of trigger isolation requirement as a function of number of interactions per bunch crossing </b><br>
EF isolated muon trigger efficiency with respect to the offline isolated muons from Z decays as a function of <&#956;>, the average number of interactions per bunch crossing.
The track isolation variable (&#931;pT) is defined as the sum of the p<sub>T</sub> of tracks having p<sub>T</sub> > 1 GeV found in the ID in a cone of &#916;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate, 
after subtracting the p<sub>T</sub> of the muon.
The circles show the relative efficiency with the relative track isolation cut at 0.12.
The efficiency does not include the efficiencies of the previous steps of the isolated trigger chain. The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors.
The amount of data used corresponds to 3.79 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_isoeff_mu.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_isoeff_mu.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_isoeff_mu.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> Trigger isolation variable as a function of number of interactions per bunch crossing </b><br>
Mean of the EF track isolation variable for muons from Z decays as a function of <&#956;>, the average number of interactions per bunch crossing.
The vertical error bars in each figure represent the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds to 3.79 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="ICHEP12_iso_var.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/ICHEP12_iso_var.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/ICHEP12_iso_var.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>



</tbody>
</table>

---++ L1 Muon trigger Rates in 2012 

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The first row shows the rates obtained for p<sub>T</sub> >10 GeV muon selection (L1_MU10), the second row for p<sub>T</sub> >15 GeV selection (L1_MU15), the third row for p<sub>T</sub> >20 GeV (L1_MU20) selection. In the first column the total rates (Barrel+Endcaps |eta|<2.4) are displayed, while in the second (third) column the Barrel rates, |eta|<1.05 (the Endcaps rates, 1.05<|eta|<2.4) are displayed. The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="all_rates_app.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/all_rates_app.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/all_rates_app.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU10 muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu10.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu10.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu10.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU10 Barrel muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu10b.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu10b.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu10b.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU10 Endcap muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu10e.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu10e.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu10e.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU15 muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu15.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu15.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu15.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU15 Barrel muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu15b.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu15b.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu15b.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU15 Endcap muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu15e.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu15e.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu15e.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU20 muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu20.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu20.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu20.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU20 Barrel muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu20b.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu20b.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu20b.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 MU20 Endcap muon rates as a function of the instantaneous luminosity, measured with 2012 data. </b><br> The black points represent the total measured rate, the red points the fake rates. All uncertainties are statistical. A fake trigger is defined as a trigger that does not match with a offline reconstructed muon within a cone DR=&#8730;(&#951;2+&#966;2) of 0.4. The higher fake fraction in the endcaps is due to the tracking outside the magnetic field, measuring only the deviation from the direction pointing towards the nominal IP position, and the smaller level arm with respect to the barrel layout. Fake triggers are understood to be mainly due to secondary particles, for example protons produced in dense materials such as the magnets. A linear fit is applied to both the total and fake rate curves, the fitted slopes are shown in the plots. The amount of data used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of about 1.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="mu20e.png" src="%ATTACHURL%/mu20e.png"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/mu20e.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>


</tbody>
</table>

---+ Plots for 2011 data @ 7 TeV


---++ Muon trigger performances in 2011 (approved plots for CHEP 2012)

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 trigger rates </b><br>
L1 trigger rates before prescale for a run recorded on 22 October 2011 with a fill of 1332 proton bunches in 12 trains with 50 ns bunch spacing.
Open circles are for L1 MU10 (2-station and 3-station coincidence triggers in barrel and endcap regions, respectively),
filled circles are for L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger) and open squares are for L1 2MU4.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" alt="CHEP12_l1rates.jpg" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_l1rates.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/CHEP12_l1rates.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 efficiency (barrel) </b><br>
L1 trigger efficiency with respect to isolated offline combined muons in the barrel region as a function of pT of the muon.
Filled circles and open circles show L1 MU10 (2-station coincidence trigger) and L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger) efficiencies, respectively. 
The tag-and-probe method with Z was used to derive efficiencies. 
The efficiencies include geometrical acceptance of the RPC detector. 
The vertical error bars show the statistical errors. 
The amount of data used for the efficiency measurement corresponds to 0.35 pb<sup>-1</sup>, taken after the last calibration performed on RPC detector during 2011 data taking period.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 efficiency (endcapl) </b><br>
L1 trigger efficiency with respect to isolated offline combined muons in the endcap regions as a function of pT of the muon. Open circles show L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger) efficiency. The tag-and-probe method with Z was used to derive efficiencies. The efficiencies include geometrical acceptance of the TGC detectors. The vertical error bars show the statistical errors. The amount of data used for the measurement corresponds to 2.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon trigger execution time</b><br>
Measured execution times per RoI of the L2 combined reconstruction chain. The processing times of HLT algorithms have been determined on Intel Core Duo CPU E8400 with clock speed of 3.00 GHz running on raw data from the events selected by jet, tau or missing ET triggers at a luminosity of about 3.1 x 10<sup>33</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>. In 2011 the computing nodes of the HLT consisted mainly of Intel Harpertown quad-core CPUs running at
2.5 GHz. The mean time of the algorithm is indicated in the legend.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2timings.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2timings.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon trigger execution time</b><br>
Measured execution times per RoI of EF reconstruction chains. One chain starts from muon spectrometer track (outside-in) and another chain starts from inner detector track (inside-out). The processing times of HLT algorithms have been determined on Intel Core Duo CPU E8400 with clock speed of 3.00 GHz running on raw data from the events selected by jet, tau or missing ET triggers at a luminosity of about 3.1 x 10<sup>33</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>. Solid and dashed lines are for outside-in and inside-out chains, respectively. In 2011 the computing nodes of the HLT consisted mainly of Intel Harpertown quad-core CPUs running at 2.5 GHz. The mean time of each algorithm is indicated in the legend. In 2012, outside-in algorithm is complemented by inside-out algorithm.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_EFtimings_.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_EFtimings.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF trigger rate</b><br>
Trigger rates for a run recorded on 22 October 2011 with a fill of 1332 proton bunches in 12 trains with 50 ns bunch spacing. Rates of two independent EF trigger algorithms, one starting from muon spectrometer track (outside-in) and another starting from inner detector track (inside-out), are shown. Filled circles and open circles are for
mu18 medium inside-out and mu18 medium outside-in algorithms, respectively. The
mu18 medium is the unprescaled triggers seeded by L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger). The lower part of the plot shows ratio of rate to luminosity. The vertical error bars show the statistical errors.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_EfRateRatio.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_EfRateRatio.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>muon trigger efficiency as a function of offline muon pT (barrel)</b><br>
Efficiencies in terms of offline muon pT for mu18 medium trigger, which uses muon spectrometer track based algorithm at EF (outside-in), in the barrel region. The
mu18 medium is the unprescaled triggers seeded by L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger). The tag-and-probe method with Z was used to derive efficiencies. In upper part of the plot, open circles and filled boxes show data and MC, respectively. Lower part of the plot shows ratio of data efficiencies to those of Monte Carlo. The vertical error bars and the vertical size of the boxes show the statistical errors. The amount of data used for the trigger efficiency measurement corresponds to 2.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>muon trigger efficiency as a function of offline muon pT (endcap)</b><br>
Efficiencies in terms of offline muon pT for mu18 medium trigger, which uses muon spectrometer track based algorithm at EF (outside-in), in the endcap regions. The
mu18 medium is the unprescaled trigger seeded by L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger). The tag-and-probe method with Z was used to derive efficiencies. In upper part of the plot, open circles and filled boxes show data and MC, respectively. Lower part of the plot shows ratio of data efficiencies to those of Monte Carlo. The vertical error bars and the vertical size of the boxes show the statistical errors. The amount of data used for the trigger efficiency measurement corresponds to 2.8 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>muon trigger efficiency as a function of interactions per bunch crossing</b><br>
Trigger efficiencies in plateau region (pT > 20 GeV) as a function of interactions per bunch crossing with data collected during LHC operation at &#946;<sup>&#8727;</sup> = 1.0 m. The tag-and-probe method with Z was used to derive efficiencies. The figure is for mu18 medium trigger with muon spectrometer track based algorithm at EF (outside-in). The mu18 medium is the unprescaled triggers seeded by L1 MU11 (3-station coincidence trigger). Circles and triangles are for barrel and endcap regions, respectively. The difference of efficiencies in barrel and endcap regions are due to geometrical acceptance of level1 trigger chambers. The vertical error bars show the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds to 1.9 fb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_pileup_outsidein.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_pileup_outsidein.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 calorimeter and track isolation variables as a function of number of vertexes</b><br>
Mean of L2 isolation variables calculated for muons from Z decays in terms of number of reconstructed vertices. Triangles show the mean transverse energy deposition in annuli, defined as 0.07 < &#8710;R < 0.2 in electromagnetic calorimeter and 0.1 < &#8710;R < 0.2 in hadronic calorimeter, around the muon candidate. Circles show the mean of the sum of track pT around the muon candidate. Inner detector tracks in a cone size of &#8710;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate with pT > 1 GeV satisfying |z0(inner detector track) &#8722; z0(muon track)| < 15 mm are used for the sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. The vertical error bars show the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds
to 220 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2Iso_iso_vs_nvrtx.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2Iso_iso_vs_nvrtx.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Efficiency and rejection of L2 calorimeter isolation</b><br>
Efficiency and rejection of the L2 isolated trigger with 18 GeV threshold as a function of the cut on the &#931;ET /pT (&#956;). Annuli, defined
as 0.07 < &#8710;R < 0.2 in electromagnetic calorimeter and
0.1 < &#8710;R < 0.2 in hadronic calorimeter, around the muon candidate are used for the &#931;ET calculation. The efficiency is estimated with respect to isolated muons from Z &#8594; &#956;&#956; decays and the rejection (defined as 1 - efficiency) is derived with respect to L2 combined muon candidates with 18 GeV threshold. The amount of data used corresponds to 180 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff1.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Efficiency and rejection of L2 track isolation</b><br>
Efficiency and rejection of the L2 isolated trigger with 18 GeV threshold as a function of the cut on the &#931;pT /pT (&#956;). The cone size of 0.2 around the muon candidate is used for &#931;pT calculation. Only the L2 inner detector tracks with pT > 1 GeV satisfying
|z0 (L2 track) &#8722; z0 (L2 SA)| < 15 mm are used for the sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. The efficiency is estimated with respect to isolated muons from Z &#8594; &#956;&#956; decays and the rejection (defined as 1 - efficiency) is derived with respect to L2 combined muon candidates with 18 GeV threshold. Majority of muons from Z decays have &#931;pT /pT (&#956;) close to 0 thus the efficiency curve starts from 0.95. The amount of data used corresponds
to 180 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff2.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff2.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Efficiency and rejection of L2 isolation working points </b><br>
Rejection for L2 muon candidates selected by 18 GeV threshold trigger in terms of efficiency for muons from Z decays with optimised isolation criteria. Dots on the curve show operating points for tight isolation (&#931; ET < 1.4 GeV and &#931; pT < 5.7 GeV) and loose isolation (&#931; ET < 2.7 GeV) triggers. The amount of data used corresponds to 180 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2Iso_ROC.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_L2Iso_ROC.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Distribution of EF track isolation variable</b><br>
Distributions of the ratio between the sum of the pT of tracks around the muon candidate to the pT of the muon candidate. Only the EF inner detector tracks in a cone size of &#8710;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate with pT > 1 GeV satisfying
|z0(inner detector track) &#8722; z0(muon track)| < 10 mm are used for the above sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. Histogram hatched with left slanted lines shows distributions for isolated muons coming from Z decays. Histogram hatched with right slanted lines are for muon candidates identified by EF combined trigger with 22 GeV threshold. The amount of data used corresponds to 220 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_Iso_relvar.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_Iso_relvar.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Efficiency of EF track isolation</b><br>
EF isolated muon trigger efficiency with respect to offline isolated muon from Z decays as a function of the pT of the muon. The ratio between the sum of the pT of tracks around the muon candidate to the pT of the muon candidate is required to be less than 0.12. The cut is used in 2012 data taking period. Only the EF inner detector tracks in a cone size of &#8710;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate with pT > 1 GeV satisfying
|z0(inner detector track) &#8722; z0(muon track)| < 10 mm are used for the above sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. The amount of data used corresponds
to 220 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_IsoEff_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_IsoEff_pt.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF track isolation variable as a function of number of vertexes</b><br>
Mean of track isolation variable calculated at EF for muons coming from Z decays in terms of number of reconstructed vertices. Muons are selected by EF combined trigger with 22 GeV threshold. Circles show the mean of the sum of track pT around the muon candidate. Inner detector tracks in a cone size of &#8710;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate with pT > 1 GeV satisfying |z0(inner detector track) &#8722; z0(muon track)| < 10 mm are used for the sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. The vertical error bars show the statistical errors. The amount of data used corresponds to 220 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_IsoPt_nvtx.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_IsoPt_nvtx.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Rejection and efficiency of EF track isolation working point</b><br>
Rejection for EF muon candidates selected by 22 GeV threshold trigger in terms of efficiency for muons from Z decays. The ratio between the sum of the pT of tracks around the muon candidate to the pT of the muon candidate is varied to make the curve. Inner detector tracks in a cone size of &#8710;R = 0.2 around the muon candidate with pT > 1 GeV satisfying |z0(inner detector track) &#8722; z0(muon track)| < 10 mm are used for the sum. The pT of the muon candidate is subtracted from the sum. The operating point of the isolated trigger in 2012 is shown with the filled circle. The amount of data used corresponds to 220 pb<sup>-1</sup>.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_Iso_ROC.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/CHEP12_Iso_ROC.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---++ Trigger efficiencies as a function of interactions per bunch crossing for LHCC

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF mu18 Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction (barrel region) </b><br>
The measured efficiency of the single muon trigger for pT &gt; 18 GeV muons (“mu18”) at &eta; &lt; 1.05, as a function of interactions per bunch crossing.
The efficiencies were measured separately for two trigger chains one is seeded fromLevel-1 2-station trigger, the other is seeded from Level-1 3-station trigger. 
The 2-station trigger was in use for limited run periods of 2011 data taking, thus this measurement is llimited up to interactions per bunch crossing around 13. 
The efficiency was measured with respect to muons reconstructed offline with pT &gt; 20 GeV, with the Tag-and-Probe method by using muons from Z decays.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18wrtMu_barrel.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18wrtMu_barrel.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF mu18 Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction (endcap region) </b><br>
The measured efficiency of the single muon trigger for pT &gt; 18 GeV muons (“mu18”) at &eta; &gt; 1.05, as a function of interactions per bunch crossing.
The efficiency was measured with respect to muons reconstructed offlinewith pT &gt; 20 GeV, 
with the Tag-and-Probe method by using muons from Z decays.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18wrtMu_endcap.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18wrtMu_endcap.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---++ L1 Barrel (RPC) Trigger efficiencies for LHCC

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Barrel Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction (as a function of pT) </b><br>
L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency, for the six nominal thresholds, with respect to offline reconstructed
muon as a function of the muon pT. The different acceptance between the 2-station coincidence
low-pT thresholds (MU4, MU6, MU10) and the 3-station coincidence high-pT thresholds
(MU11, MU15, MU20) is caused by the smaller coverage for the additional coincidence.
The efficiency has been determined with a tag and probe method using di-muon events.
The data used correspond to total integrated luminosity of 380 pb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/forApp_pt_rebin_newlab.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/forApp_pt_rebin_newlab.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Barrel Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction (as a function of &eta;) </b><br>
The L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency, for the 2-station threshold MU10 and the
3-station threshold MU11, with respect to offline reconstructed combined muon,
selected with pT &gt; 15 GeV, as a funciton of the muon &eta;.
The efficiency has been determined with a tag and probe method using di-muon events.
The data used correspond to total integrated luminosity of 380 pb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/forApp_eta_newlab.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/forApp_eta_newlab.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Barrel Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction (as a function of &phi;) </b><br>
The L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency, for the 2-station threshold MU10 and the
3-station threshold MU11, with respect to offline reconstructed combined muon,
selected with pT &gt; 15 GeV, as a funciton of the muon &phi;.
The efficiency has been determined with a tag and probe method using di-muon events.
The data used correspond to total integrated luminosity of 380 pb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/forApp_phi_newlab.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/forApp_phi_newlab.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Barrel Trigger Efficiency for different periods with number of interactions per bunch crossing, with respect to combined muon reconstruction (as a function of pT) </b><br>
The L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency, for the 2-station threshold MU10, with respect to offline reconstructed combined muon
as a funciton of the muon pT.
The efficiency curves are shown for different ranges of the average value of the number of
interactions per bunch crossing, &mu;.
The efficiency has been determined with a tag and probe method using di-muon events.
The data used correspond to total integrated luminosity of 380 pb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/forApp_LPTvsmu_newlab.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/forApp_LPTvsmu_newlab.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Barrel Trigger Efficiency for different periods with number of interactions per bunch crossing, with respect to combined muon reconstruction (as a function of pT) </b><br>
The L1 muon barrel trigger efficiency, for the 3-station threshold MU11, with respect to offline reconstructed combined muon
as a funciton of the muon pT.
The efficiency curves are shown for different ranges of the average value of the number of
interactions per bunch crossing, &mu;.
The efficiency has been determined with a tag and probe method using di-muon events.
The data used correspond to total integrated luminosity of 380 pb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/forApp_HPTvsmu_newlab.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/forApp_HPTvsmu_newlab.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>



---++ MuFast plot for IEEE 2011

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Beta distribution in endcap regions for muon track of pT=20 GeV</b><br>
Beta distribution in endcap regions for muon track of pT=20 GeV  where the magnetic field is homogeneous. Beta measures the track bending: it is the angle among the muon track segment fit in the innermost chamber (i.e. before the bending of the endcap toroid) and the muon track segment fit in the middle / middle+outermost chambers (i.e. after the bending of the endcap toroid). 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/BetaEndcapRegion.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/BetaEndcapRegion.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>Beta distribution in endcap transition regions for muon track of pT=20 GeV</b><br>
Beta distribution for muon track of pT=20 GeV in the endcap regions where the magnetic field is highly inhomogeneous. Beta measures the track bending: it is the angle among the muon track segment fit in the innermost chamber (i.e. before the bending of the endcap toroid) and the muon track segment fit in the middle / middle+outermost chambers (i.e. after the bending of the endcap toroid). 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/BetaTransitionRegion.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/BetaTransitionRegion.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast online execution time</b><br>
Plot showing the MuFast online wall-clock time (i.e. including the ROS access/data transfer time) per RoI. The wall-clock time of the mu13 selection chain, including the Inner Detector tracking and the combined reconstruction algorithm is also shown. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/muFastExecutionTime.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/muFastExecutionTime.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast pT resolution after tuning (barrel)</b><br>
Relative pT resolution for the barrel region (|eta|<1.05) for 2010 data reprocessed with the Look Up Tables (LUT) for the pT estimation computed using the best knowledge of the alignment condition data.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/barrel_tuning.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/barrel_tuning.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast pT resolution after tuning (endcap)</b><br>
Relative pT resolution for the endcap region (1.05<|eta|<2.4) for 2010 data reprocessed with tuned Look Up Tables (LUT) computed using the best knowledge of the alignment condition data.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/endcap_tuning_ptRes.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/endcap_tuning_ptRes.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast pT resolution on 2011 data</b><br>
Relative pT resolution of MuFast for 2011 data as a function of the reconstructed muon pT. At high-pT, the barrel performance are slightly degraded with respect to the tuning. It is likely due to change in alignment constant: the effect correspond to a spread of 2-3 mm in the track sagitta.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/muFastResolution.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/muFastResolution.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast efficiency in the barrel region for 2011 data</b><br>
Turn on curves for the barrel region computed with respect to LVL1. The total 2% plateau inefficiency of MuFast originates from border effect in the feet region of the spectrometer (~0.7%) and from bad detector status and/or bad LVL1 timing.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/muFastEfficiencyBarrel_lvl1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/muFastEfficiencyBarrel_lvl1.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>MuFast efficiency in the endcap region for 2011 data</b><br>
Turn on curves for the endcap region computed with respect to LVL1. The total 4% inefficiency of MuFast originates mostly from the large resolution tails in the transition region (1.3<|eta|<1.5) where the magnetic is highly inhomogenous due to the interference among the barrel and the endcap toroids. The inefficiency due to bad detector status and/or bad LVL1 timing is about 1%.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/muFastEfficiencyEndcap_lvl1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/muFastEfficiencyEndcap_lvl1.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---++ Trigger efficiencies for PLHC2011

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF mu18 Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction</b><br>
Efficiency of the muon trigger with 18 GeV nominal threshold vs muon $\eta$, with respect to offline combined muon reconstruction, evaluated with a Tag And Probe method on Zmumu events. Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138.5 pb-1, taken in the first months of 2011 (dots), are compared to the Zmumu MC signal sample (triangles). The overall data efficiency is 0.8125 $\pm$ 0.0015 while the MC efficiency is 0.7902 $\pm$ 0.0002, statistical errors only. In the bottom part the SF(DATA/MC) is reported which is 1.0283 $\pm$ 0.0016 overall. The data/MC scale factor is about 2\%, i.e. data efficiency is highier then MC. This reflects the improvements
in the detector operation point tuning not yet propagated to the simulation.  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18MGSF_eta.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18MGSF_eta.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF mu18 Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction</b><br>
Efficiency of the muon trigger with 18 GeV nominal threshold vs muon pT, with respect to offline combined muon reconstruction, evaluated with a Tag And Probe method on Zmumu events. Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138.5 pb-1, taken in the first months of 2011 (dots), are compared to the Zmumu MC signal sample (triangles). The overall data efficiency is 0.8125 $\pm$ 0.0015 while the MC efficiency is 0.7902 $\pm$ 0.0002, statistical errors only. In the bottom part the SF(DATA/MC) is reported which is 1.0283 $\pm$ 0.0016 overall. The data/MC scale factor is about 2\%, i.e. data efficiency is highier then MC. This reflects the improvements
in the detector operation point tuning not yet propagated to the simulation.  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18MGSF_pt.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu18MGSF_pt.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


</tbody>
</table>


---+ Plots for 2010 data @ 7 TeV

---++ Trigger efficiencies



---+++ L1 Muon trigger efficiencies

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Muon Endcap Trigger Efficiency wrt to offline</b><br>
  L1 Muon Endcap Trigger Efficiency as a function of pT from offline
  reconstructed spectrometer only muons extrapolated to the
  interaction region (Muon "Stand Alone" pT). The efficiency is
  calculated with respect to offline muons reconstructed with the muon
  spectrometer and the inner detector with &eta; &gt;1.05. L1 RoI to
  offline matching criteria is DR&lt;0.5.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/MuonswBeam_TGC_ME_MU0_MUID_eff_nofit.jpg"/><br>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/MuonswBeam_TGC_ME_MU0_MUID_eff_nofit.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Muon Endcap Trigger (6GeV) Efficiency wrt to offline</b><br>
  The plot shows the L1 muon trigger efficiency relative to the
  offline muons in the end-cap regions for the 2nd lowest threshold,
  L1_MU6. To derive this L1_MU6 efficiency, the same method as
  described in ATL-COM-GEN-2010-023 is used; the used sample is based
  on L1 calorimeter jet trigger (L1_J30) and amounts approximately 213
  nb-1 of effective luminosity. The offline combined muon was required
  to have 1.05 &lt; | eta | &lt; 2.40. A matching criteria between L1
  muon candidate and offline reconstructed muon of dR&lt;0.5 was
  applied. The efficiency is measured with respect to offline
  reconstructed combined muons as a function of the spectrometer muon
  pT (turn-on curve). The turn-on curve is fitted with the Fermi
  function <img src="%ATTACHURLPATH%/L1MU6Endcap_fermiFunction.jpg"/><br> 
  The plateau efficiency (A) is determined as 0.936Â±0.006.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/L1MU6Endcap_eff.jpg" /><br> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/L1MU6Endcap_eff.jpg][jpg]]
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/L1MU6Endcap_eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Muon Barrel Trigger Efficiency wrt to offline</b><br>
  L1 Muon Barrel Trigger Efficiency as a function of pT from offline
  reconstructed spectrometer only muons extrapolated to the
  interaction region (Muon "Stand Alone" pT). The efficiency is
  calculated with respect to offline muons reconstructed with the muon
  spectrometer and the inner detector with | eta | &lt;1.05. L1 RoI to
  offline matching criteria is DR&lt;0.5. Overlaid are fully simulated
  minimum bias and single muon Monte Carlos.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/RPC_MU0_MUID_eff_MU_me_mc.jpg" /><br> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/RPC_MU0_MUID_eff_MU_me_mc.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Muon Barrel Trigger (6GeV) Efficiency wrt to offline</b><br>
  L1 Barrel Muon Trigger Efficiency as a function of pT from offline
  reconstructed spectrometer only muons extrapolated to the
  interaction region (Muon "Stand Alone" pT). The nominal trigger
  threshold is set to pt&gt;6 GeV. The efficiency is calculated with
  respect to offline muons reconstructed with the muon spectrometer
  and the inner detector with | eta | &lt;1.05. L1 RoI to offline
  matching criteria is DR&lt;0.5. Overlaid are fully simulated minimum
  bias and single muon Monte Carlos.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/RPC_MU6_MUID_eff_MU_me_mc.jpg" /><br>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/RPC_MU6_MUID_eff_MU_me_mc.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 Trigger efficiency measured with J/Psi and "tag and probe" method</b><br>
  Trigger efficiency of L1 muon for the lowest threshold MU0 as a
  function of the offline muon pT obtained with a tag and probe method
  on Jpsi candidates using combined muons for both the tag and probe
  tracks. Events are required to have passed the L1 MinBias trigger
  and a muon Atlas.EventFilter confirmation. A reconstructed primary
  vertex with at least 3 Inner Detector (ID) track is required in each
  event. Muon combined tracks in the eta range [-2.4,2.4] are required
  to match with a reconstructed primary vertex with z&lt;10mm. Only
  muons associated with ID tracks that have at least one hit in the
  pixels and six in the SCT are accepted. The Jpsi candidates have
  been selected asking for two opposite sign muons and with angular
  distance 0.4&lt;DR&lt;2.0 and with an invariant mass window between
  2860 MeV and 3340 MeV. The tag and probe method has been applied
  matching the combined muons to muon trigger RoIs using the
  geometrical criteria DR&lt;0.4. L1 triggers found within +- 3 BCs
  are included in the efficiency calculation as the RPC L1 timing is
  not yet fully commissioned.The used data sample corresponds to an
  integrated luminosity of about 210nb-1.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/TP_MU0_All.gif" /><br> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/TP_MU0_All.gif][gif]] 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/TP_MU0_All.eps][eps]]
</td></tr>



</tbody>
</table>


---+++ HLT muon trigger efficiencies performance

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon efficiency (spectrometer only)</b><br>
  Efficiency of the L2 muon spectrometer only trigger wrt to the L1
  muon trigger as a function of the transverse momentum pT from
  offline reconstructed spectrometer only muons extrapolated to the
  interaction region. A cut at L2 is applied to retain muons with
  pt&gt;4GeV.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/L2_mu4_MSonly_eff.jpg"/><br>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/L2_mu4_MSonly_eff.pdf][pdf]] 
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon trigger efficiency (spectrometer and inner detector)</b><br>
  Efficiency of the L2 muon trigger combining muon spectrometer and
  inner detector information wrt to the L1 muon trigger as a function
  of the transverse momentum pT from offline reconstructed combined
  muons. A cut at L2 is applied to retain muons with pt&gt;4GeV.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/mu4_eff_mucomb_mufast_p_t_total.jpg"/><br> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/mu4_eff_mucomb_mufast_p_t_total.pdf][pdf]]</p>  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon efficiency (spectrometer and inner detector)</b><br>
  Efficiency of the Event Filter muon trigger, combining muon
  spectrometer and inner detector information (CB), wrt to L2 CB muon
  trigger as a function of the transverse momentum pt from offline
  reconstructed CB muons. A cut at EF is applied to retain muons with
  pt&gt;4GeV.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/c__mcdatacomp_eff_g_eff_mh_muidmu_mefcomb_active_pt_EF_mu4clone_rebin_toGeVh_muidmu_ml2mucomb_pt_EF_mu4clone_rebin_toGeV.jpg"/><br>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/c__mcdatacomp_eff_g_eff_mh_muidmu_mefcomb_active_pt_EF_mu4clone_rebin_toGeVh_muidmu_ml2mucomb_pt_EF_mu4clone_rebin_toGeV.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon combined efficiency</b><br>
  Efficiency of the Event Filter muon combined trigger wrt to L2 muon
  combined trigger as a function of the rapidity eta from offline
  reconstructed combined muons. A cut at EF is applied to retain muons
  with pt&gt;4GeV.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/c__mcdatacomp_eff_g_eff_mh_muidmu_mefcomb_active_eta_EF_mu4cloneh_muidmu_ml2mucomb_eta_EF_mu4clone.jpg"/><br>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/c__mcdatacomp_eff_g_eff_mh_muidmu_mefcomb_active_eta_EF_mu4cloneh_muidmu_ml2mucomb_eta_EF_mu4clone.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---+++ RPC and TGC trigger efficiencies

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L1 RPC trigger Efficiency wrt offline muons </b><br /> 
  Trigger Efficiency of L1 RPC for the lowest threshold MU0 relative
  to offline combined muons, as a function of pT (offline). Data
  sample selected from runs 152777-153599, require &gt;=3 Inner
  Detector tracks and L1 Minimum Bias trigger. Efficiency calculated
  with respect to offline combined Muons with &eta; &lt;1.05. L1 RoI
  to offline matching criteria is DR&lt;0.5. Error is defined as
  smallest interval containing 68% of posterior with flat prior using
  Bayesian statistics.Remarks: Inefficiency at plateau is mainly due
  to the detector geometrical acceptance. L1 triggers found within
  +-3BCs are included in the efficiency calculation as the RPC L1
  timing is not yet fully commissioned. A plateau value of 84% is
  expected when the RPC detector is fully commissioned.
</td>
<td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/1_L1RPCeff.jpg"/><br/>
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/1_L1RPCeff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b> L1 TGC trigger Efficiency wrt offline muons </b><br />
  L1 TGC trigger efficiency for the lowest threshold MU0 relative to
  offline combined muons, as a function of pT(offline) for &eta;
  &gt;1.05. Require a match of L1 ROI to offline muon, matching
  criteria is DR&lt;0.5. Data sample selected from runs 152166-153200,
  require &gt;=3 Inner Detector tracks, and a L1 Minimum Bias trigger.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/2_L1TGCeff.jpg" /><br />
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/2_L1TGCeff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

---+++ HLT trigger efficiencies and L2 track parameters for long run 153565 in April

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon standalone, algorithm efficiency wrt offline muons, L1 muon trigger required </b><br />
  Efficiency of the L2 muon standalone algorithm relative to offline
  reconstructed muons as a function of the transverse momentum pT
  measured by the offline. Data selected is run 153565, require a L1
  muon trigger, offline selection requires a reconstructed combined
  muon with a pT&gt;2 GeV, momentum p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the
  silicon detectors &gt;5, and a match with a L1 RoI in
  DR&lt;0.5. Error is defined as smallest interval containing 68% of
  posterior with flat prior using Bayesian statistics.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/3_L2eff.jpg" /><br />
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/3_L2eff.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon standalone, efficiency with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV wrt offline muons, L1 muon trigger required </b><br />
  Efficiency of L2 muon standalone algorithm relative to offline
  reconstructed muons with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV as a
  function of the transverse momentum pT measured by the offline
  reconstruction (turn-on curve). Data selected is run 153565, require
  a L1 muon trigger, offline selection requires a reconstructed
  combined muon with a pT&gt;2 GeV, momentum p&gt;4 GeV, number of
  hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5, and a match with a L1 RoI in
  DR&lt;0.5. Error is defined as smallest interval containing 68% of
  posterior with flat prior using Bayesian statistics.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/4_L2eff4gev.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/4_L2eff4gev.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon standalone, track parameter comparison to offline </b><br /> 
  Transverse momentum pT determined by the L2 muon standalone
  algorithm versus pT measured offline. Data selected is run 153565,
  offline selection requires a L1 muon trigger, a reconstructed
  combined muon with a pT&gt;6 GeV, momentum p&gt;4 GeV, number of
  hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5, and a match with a L1 RoI in
  DR&lt;0.5.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/5_L2trk.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/5_L2trk.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon combined, efficiency with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV wrt offline and L2 standalone muons, for the Barrel region (*  &eta;  &lt;1.05)</b><br />
  Efficiency of the L2 muon combined algorithm relative to the L2 muon
  spectrometer algorithm with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV as a
  function of the transverse momentum pT of the offline reconstructed
  combined muon. Data selected is run 153565, require a L1 muon
  trigger, offline selection requires a reconstructed combined muon
  with rapidity eta &lt;1.05 (Barrel region), pT&gt;2 GeV, momentum
  p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5, and a
  match with a L1 RoI in DR&lt;0.5. Error is defined as smallest
  interval containing 68% of posterior with flat prior using Bayesian
  statistics.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/6_L2cbeff.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/6_L2cbeff.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon combined, efficiency with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV wrt offline and L2 standalone muons, for the Endcap region (*  &eta;  &gt;1.05) </b><br /> 
  Efficiency of the L2 muon combined algorithm relative to the L2 muon
  spectrometer algorithm with a nominal threshold set to 4 GeV as a
  function of the transverse momentum pT of the offline reconstructed
  combined muon. Data selected is run 153565, require a L1 muon
  trigger, offline selection requires a reconstructed combined muon
  with rapidity eta &gt;1.05 (endcap region), pT&gt;2 GeV, momentum
  p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5, and a
  match with a L1 RoI in DR&lt;0.5. Error is defined as smallest
  interval containing 68% of posterior with flat prior using Bayesian
  statistics.Remark: The lower efficiency observed is due to a not yet
  optimised search window for the inner detector tracks around the
  muon direction in the endcap transition region where the resolutions
  in the muon spectrometer is inferior due to the configuration of
  magnetic field.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/7_l2cbeff4gev.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/7_l2cbeff4gev.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>L2 muon combined, track parameters wrt to offline </b><br />
  Comparison of the transverse momentum pT as measured by the L2 muon
  combined algorithm and offline combined muon reconstruction. Data
  selected is run 153565, offline selection requires a L1 muon
  trigger, a reconstructed combined muon with pT&gt;2 GeV, momentum
  p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5, and a
  match with a L1 RoI in DR&lt;0.5.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/8_L2cbtrk.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/8_L2cbtrk.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon standalone, algorithm efficiency wrt to offline muons </b><br />
  Efficiency of the EF muon standalone algorithm relative to offline
  reconstructed combined muon, as a function of transverse momentum pT
  as measured by the offline. Data selected is run 153565, offline
  selection requires a reconstructed combined muon with pT&gt;2 GeV,
  momentum p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors
  &gt;5. Error is defined as smallest interval containing 68% of
  posterior with flat prior using Bayesian statistics.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/9_EFeff.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/9_EFeff.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon standalone, comparison of track parameters to offline </b><br />
  Comparison of the transverse momentum pT measured by the EF muon
  standalone algorithm and the offline standalone pT measurement of
  the offline combined muon. Data selected is run 153565, offline
  selection requires a reconstructed combined muon with pT&gt;2 GeV,
  momentum p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/10_EFtrk.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/10_EFtrk.pdf][pdf]]  
</td></tr>


<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF muon combined, comparison of track parameters to offline </b><br /> 
  Comparison of the transverse momentum pT measured by the EF muon
  combined algorithm and the offline combined muon
  reconstruction. Data selected is run 153565, offline selection
  requires a reconstructed combined muon with pT &gt;2 GeV, momentum
  p&gt;4 GeV, number of hits in the silicon detectors &gt;5.
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/11_EFcbtrk.jpg" /><br /> 
[[%PUBURLPATH%/%WEB%/TriggerPublicResults/11_EFcbtrk.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>


</tbody>
</table>

---+++ Di-muons Trigger Efficiency

<table class="twikiTable" width="100%" bgcolor=#f5f5fa  border=1 cellpadding=10 cellspacing=10>
<colgroup><col width="60%"></colgroup>
<tbody>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs muon p 
T (the higher pT muon) evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction. 
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles). The data efficiency evaluated 
at plateau (for muon pT>8 GeV) is 0.787 ± 0.005 while the MC efficiency is  
0.786 ±0.003, statistical errors only. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt1.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect to the lower pT combined muon</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs muon p 
T (the lower pT muon) evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction.  
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles). 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt2.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt2.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect to the eta of the higher pT combined muon</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs muon 
&#951; (the higher pT 
muon) evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction.  
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles).  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta1.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect to the eta of the lower pT combined muon</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs muon 
&#951; (the lower pT 
muon) evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction.  
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles).  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta2.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta2.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect vs &#916;R between the two muons</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs &#916;R between the two 
muons evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction.  
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles).  
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_dr.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EFmu4_jpsimumu_dr.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

<tr><td bgcolor="#eeeeee"><b>EF_2mu4_jpsimumu efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon</b><br /> 
Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_2mu4_Jpsimumu vs muon p 
T (the higher pT muon) evaluated on candidate J/&#968; &#8594;µµ events with respect to offline combined muon 
reconstruction.  
Data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 38 pb&#65293;1 taken in the 2010 (dots), are 
compared to the J/&#968; &#8594;µµ MC signal sample (triangles). The data efficiency evaluated 
at plateau (for muon pT>8 GeV) is 0.41 ± 0.05 while the MC efficiency is 0.39 ± 0.04, 
statistical errors only. 
</td><td align="center">
<img width="300" src="%ATTACHURL%/EF2mu4_jpsimumu_pt1.jpg"/><br>
[[%ATTACHURL%/EF2mu4_jpsimumu_pt1.pdf][pdf]]
</td></tr>

</tbody>
</table>
-----
*Major updates*:%BR%
-- Main.JoergStelzer - 13-Jun-2011 %BR%
*%RESPONSIBLE%* Kunihiro Nagano, Kevin Black %BR%
%STOPINCLUDE%

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
jpg	BetaEndcapRegion.jpg	r1	manage	132.4 K	2011-12-08 - 07:37	KunihiroNagano
pdf	BetaEndcapRegion.pdf	r1	manage	37.4 K	2011-11-15 - 10:41	AlessandroDiMattia	Beta distribution in endcap regions for muon track of pT=20 GeV
jpg	BetaTransitionRegion.jpg	r1	manage	238.2 K	2011-12-08 - 07:38	KunihiroNagano
pdf	BetaTransitionRegion.pdf	r1	manage	35.3 K	2011-11-15 - 10:42	AlessandroDiMattia	Beta distribution for muon track of pT=20 GeV in the endcap transition regions
eps	CHEP12_EFtimings.eps	r1	manage	9.6 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_EFtimings_.jpg	r1	manage	362.6 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_EfRateRatio.eps	r1	manage	17.2 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_EfRateRatio.jpg	r1	manage	291.5 K	2012-05-22 - 10:12	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_IsoEff_pt.eps	r1	manage	7.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_IsoEff_pt.jpg	r1	manage	270.9 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_IsoPt_nvtx.eps	r1	manage	9.7 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_IsoPt_nvtx.jpg	r1	manage	384.7 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_Iso_ROC.eps	r1	manage	8.1 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_Iso_ROC.jpg	r1	manage	304.5 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_Iso_relvar.eps	r1	manage	16.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_Iso_relvar.jpg	r1	manage	1092.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff1.eps	r1	manage	15.3 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff1.jpg	r1	manage	497.7 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff2.eps	r1	manage	16.3 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_L2IsoRel_eff2.jpg	r1	manage	460.2 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_L2Iso_ROC.eps	r1	manage	10.0 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_L2Iso_ROC.jpg	r1	manage	373.0 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_L2Iso_iso_vs_nvrtx.eps	r1	manage	11.0 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_L2Iso_iso_vs_nvrtx.jpg	r1	manage	341.7 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_L2timings.eps	r1	manage	7.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_L2timings.jpg	r1	manage	204.2 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_l1rates.eps	r1	manage	19.0 K	2012-05-22 - 10:30	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_l1rates.jpg	r1	manage	313.4 K	2012-05-22 - 10:15	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_pileup_outsidein.eps	r1	manage	10.3 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_pileup_outsidein.jpg	r1	manage	309.5 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt.eps	r1	manage	14.4 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt.jpg	r1	manage	291.6 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.eps	r1	manage	12.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_turn_on_barrel_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.jpg	r1	manage	315.1 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt.eps	r1	manage	14.5 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt.jpg	r1	manage	274.5 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.eps	r1	manage	11.1 K	2012-05-22 - 10:29	KunihiroNagano
jpg	CHEP12_turn_on_endcap_log_fermi_1ovpt_l1.jpg	r1	manage	267.8 K	2012-05-22 - 10:16	KunihiroNagano
eps	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.eps	r1	manage	19.0 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.jpg	r1	manage	113.7 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_barrel.pdf	r1	manage	13.8 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.eps	r1	manage	19.2 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.jpg	r1	manage	117.6 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_L1L2EF_endcap.pdf	r1	manage	13.9 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.eps	r1	manage	23.9 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.jpg	r1	manage	117.5 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_pt_barrel.pdf	r1	manage	13.7 K	2013-10-08 - 17:27	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.eps	r1	manage	23.8 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.jpg	r1	manage	115.5 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_pt_endcap.pdf	r1	manage	13.7 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.eps	r1	manage	24.1 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.jpg	r1	manage	130.3 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_barrel.pdf	r1	manage	14.7 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.eps	r1	manage	20.2 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.jpg	r1	manage	117.9 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_eff_various_triggers_endcap.pdf	r1	manage	14.1 K	2013-10-08 - 17:31	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_rate_EF.eps	r1	manage	11.9 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_rate_EF.jpg	r1	manage	153.2 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_rate_EF.pdf	r1	manage	12.0 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_rate_L1.eps	r1	manage	10.7 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_rate_L1.jpg	r1	manage	139.6 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_rate_L1.pdf	r1	manage	12.1 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
eps	CHEP13_rate_component_pt.eps	r1	manage	14.1 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
jpg	CHEP13_rate_component_pt.jpg	r1	manage	159.6 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
pdf	CHEP13_rate_component_pt.pdf	r1	manage	11.5 K	2013-10-08 - 17:32	MasatoAoki
jpg	EF2mu4_jpsimumu_pt1.jpg	r1	manage	107.1 K	2011-07-30 - 20:05	FrancescoConventi	EF_2mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon
pdf	EF2mu4_jpsimumu_pt1.pdf	r1	manage	24.8 K	2011-07-30 - 20:04	FrancescoConventi	EF_2mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon
jpg	EFmu18MGSF_eta.jpg	r1	manage	116.2 K	2011-07-15 - 11:36	SaraBorroni	EF_mu18_MG Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction vs eta of the combined muon
jpg	EFmu18MGSF_pt.jpg	r1	manage	111.5 K	2011-07-15 - 11:51	SaraBorroni	EF_mu18_MG Trigger Efficiency with respect to combined muon reconstruction vs pT of the combined muon
jpg	EFmu18wrtMu_barrel.jpg	r1	manage	110.5 K	2011-12-08 - 07:32	KunihiroNagano
pdf	EFmu18wrtMu_barrel.pdf	r1	manage	33.1 K	2011-12-08 - 07:32	KunihiroNagano
jpg	EFmu18wrtMu_endcap.jpg	r1	manage	90.6 K	2011-12-08 - 07:32	KunihiroNagano
pdf	EFmu18wrtMu_endcap.pdf	r1	manage	28.2 K	2011-12-08 - 07:33	KunihiroNagano
jpg	EFmu4_jpsimumu_dr.jpg	r1	manage	90.4 K	2011-07-30 - 20:04	FrancescoConventi	Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs ΔR between the two muons
pdf	EFmu4_jpsimumu_dr.pdf	r1	manage	23.4 K	2011-07-30 - 20:03	FrancescoConventi	Efficiency of the di-muons trigger EF_mu4_Jpsimumu vs ΔR between the two muons
jpg	EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta1.jpg	r1	manage	90.3 K	2011-07-30 - 20:01	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the eta of the higher pT combined muon
pdf	EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta1.pdf	r1	manage	23.5 K	2011-07-30 - 20:01	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the eta of the higher pT combined muon
jpg	EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta2.jpg	r1	manage	89.5 K	2011-07-30 - 20:02	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the eta of the lower pT combined muon
pdf	EFmu4_jpsimumu_eta2.pdf	r1	manage	23.5 K	2011-07-30 - 20:02	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the eta of the lower pT combined muon
jpg	EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt1.jpg	r1	manage	108.1 K	2011-07-30 - 19:46	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon
pdf	EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt1.pdf	r1	manage	23.8 K	2011-07-30 - 19:49	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the higher pT combined muon
jpg	EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt2.jpg	r1	manage	97.2 K	2011-07-30 - 19:55	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the lower pT combined muon
pdf	EFmu4_jpsimumu_pt2.pdf	r1	manage	23.8 K	2011-07-30 - 19:55	FrancescoConventi	EF_mu4_Jpsimumu Trigger efficiency respect to the lower pT combined muon
eps	FI-coin.eps	r1	manage	15.4 K	2016-10-12 - 13:16	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	FI-coin.pdf	r1	manage	15.3 K	2016-10-12 - 13:14	LidiaDellAsta
png	FI-coin.png	r1	manage	16.1 K	2016-10-12 - 13:14	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	35.8 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	121.4 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.2 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	103.9 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.0 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	107.3 K	2017-02-13 - 21:04	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	19.5 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	119.1 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.5 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png	r1	manage	99.8 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.1 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	107.6 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.0 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	107.4 K	2017-02-13 - 21:06	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.eps	r1	manage	16.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	30.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.eps	r1	manage	13.1 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.2 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	28.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.eps	r1	manage	14.6 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.1 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	25.2 K	2017-07-04 - 12:31	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.eps	r1	manage	16.2 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.3 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	30.4 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.eps	r1	manage	12.2 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png	r1	manage	27.5 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.eps	r1	manage	14.6 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.1 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	25.9 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
eps	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.eps	r1	manage	15.7 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.1 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
png	HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	28.7 K	2017-07-04 - 12:32	LidiaDellAsta
eps	ICHEP12_iso_var.eps	r1	manage	9.9 K	2012-09-06 - 14:18	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_iso_var.jpg	r1	manage	267.6 K	2012-07-02 - 13:34	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_isoeff_mu.eps	r1	manage	11.8 K	2012-07-02 - 13:34	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_isoeff_mu.jpg	r1	manage	268.5 K	2012-07-02 - 13:34	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_isoeff_pt.eps	r1	manage	11.3 K	2012-07-02 - 13:34	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_isoeff_pt.jpg	r1	manage	270.1 K	2012-07-02 - 13:34	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_pt.eps	r1	manage	12.0 K	2012-07-02 - 09:56	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_pt.jpg	r1	manage	319.8 K	2012-07-02 - 09:53	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_vs_mu.eps	r1	manage	10.3 K	2012-07-02 - 12:06	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg	r1	manage	270.3 K	2012-07-02 - 12:06	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.eps	r1	manage	17.1 K	2012-07-02 - 13:24	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_barrel_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg	r1	manage	417.9 K	2012-07-02 - 13:24	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_pt.eps	r1	manage	11.5 K	2012-07-02 - 09:56	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_pt.jpg	r1	manage	312.6 K	2012-07-02 - 09:53	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_vs_mu.eps	r1	manage	10.3 K	2012-07-02 - 12:05	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_Efficiency_vs_mu.jpg	r1	manage	269.4 K	2012-07-02 - 12:05	KunihiroNagano
eps	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.eps	r1	manage	17.4 K	2012-07-02 - 13:24	KunihiroNagano
jpg	ICHEP12_mu24i_tight_endcap_HLTEfficiency_PeriodA.jpg	r1	manage	428.5 K	2012-07-02 - 13:24	KunihiroNagano
eps	L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.eps	r1	manage	15.6 K	2016-09-28 - 17:36	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.jpg	r1	manage	588.1 K	2016-09-28 - 17:49	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	L1_MU4MULT_XS_VS_MU.pdf	r1	manage	17.2 K	2016-09-28 - 17:42	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.2 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	28.4 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.3 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	27.8 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.6 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_phi_endcaps_eff.png	r1	manage	26.6 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.1 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	29.0 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.8 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_HLT_mu24_ivarmedium_pt_endcaps_eff.png	r1	manage	29.3 K	2016-05-23 - 23:02	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.5 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	26.4 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.2 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	25.3 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.pdf	r1	manage	14.8 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_phi_endcaps_eff.png	r1	manage	24.2 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.7 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	28.0 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.6 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC2016_L1_MU20_Comp_pt_endcaps_eff.png	r1	manage	28.4 K	2016-05-23 - 22:48	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	23.0 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	34.2 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.2 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	29.1 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.0 K	2018-05-23 - 23:37	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	29.5 K	2018-05-23 - 23:37	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	23.0 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	34.5 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.5 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png	r1	manage	28.0 K	2018-05-23 - 23:24	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
pdf	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.2 K	2018-05-23 - 23:37	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
png	LHCC2018_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu50_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	30.1 K	2018-05-23 - 23:37	MarcusMorgenstern	LHCC2018 public plots - early 2018
jpg	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.jpg	r1	manage	35.7 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.2 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_phi_eff.png	r1	manage	195.9 K	2015-11-28 - 14:55	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.jpg	r1	manage	37.2 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.0 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	128.1 K	2015-11-28 - 14:55	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.jpg	r1	manage	35.7 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.6 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_eff.png	r1	manage	162.5 K	2015-11-28 - 14:55	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.jpg	r1	manage	38.1 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.9 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	187.8 K	2015-11-28 - 14:55	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.jpg	r1	manage	38.0 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.1 K	2015-11-27 - 15:31	LidiaDellAsta
png	LHCC_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_probe_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	191.9 K	2015-11-28 - 14:55	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.jpg	r1	manage	96.1 K	2015-08-10 - 11:42	MasatoAoki
pdf	LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.0 K	2015-08-10 - 11:42	MasatoAoki
jpg	LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.jpg	r1	manage	103.7 K	2015-08-10 - 11:42	MasatoAoki
pdf	LP2015_HLT_mu20_iloose_L1MU15_OR_HLT_mu50_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.9 K	2015-08-10 - 11:42	MasatoAoki
eps	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.eps	r1	manage	18.6 K	2016-09-28 - 17:36	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.jpg	r1	manage	343.2 K	2016-09-28 - 17:50	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_2vs3st.pdf	r1	manage	18.4 K	2016-09-28 - 17:42	LidiaDellAsta
eps	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.eps	r1	manage	20.2 K	2016-09-28 - 17:36	LidiaDellAsta
jpg	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.jpg	r1	manage	319.0 K	2016-09-28 - 17:50	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	MU4_ENDCAP_effvspt_3st.pdf	r1	manage	18.6 K	2016-09-28 - 17:42	LidiaDellAsta
eps	NSWRate.eps	r1	manage	14.0 K	2012-07-26 - 14:33	KunihiroNagano
png	NSWRate.png	r1	manage	22.1 K	2012-07-26 - 14:33	KunihiroNagano
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.1 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	30.0 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.pdf	r1	manage	16.2 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_phi_barrel_eff.png	r1	manage	28.7 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.1 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_barrel_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	87.0 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.0 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_NRecVtx_eff.png	r1	manage	30.5 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.pdf	r1	manage	15.5 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_phi_endcap_eff.png	r1	manage	27.7 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.pdf	r1	manage	17.1 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_endcap_probe_pt_eff.png	r1	manage	29.8 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
pdf	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.pdf	r1	manage	18.1 K	2017-10-19 - 17:25	LidiaDellAsta
png	RBB2017_HLT_mu26_ivarmedium_OR_HLT_mu60_Medium_IsoFixedCutTightTrackOnly_probe_eta_eff.png	r1	manage	28.7 K	2017-10-19 - 17:26	LidiaDellAsta
eps	all_rates_app.eps	r1	manage	73.2 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	all_rates_app.png	r1	manage	229.2 K	2013-04-23 - 11:23	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
jpg	barrel_tuning.jpg	r1	manage	297.7 K	2011-12-08 - 07:40	KunihiroNagano
pdf	barrel_tuning.pdf	r1	manage	36.1 K	2011-11-15 - 10:56	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast pT resolution after tuning (barrel)
jpg	endcap_tuning_ptRes.jpg	r1	manage	459.1 K	2011-12-08 - 07:41	KunihiroNagano
pdf	endcap_tuning_ptRes.pdf	r1	manage	35.7 K	2011-11-15 - 10:57	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast pT resolution after tuning (endcap)
jpg	forApp_HPTvsmu_newlab.jpg	r1	manage	348.4 K	2012-01-23 - 14:05	KunihiroNagano
pdf	forApp_HPTvsmu_newlab.pdf	r1	manage	18.7 K	2012-01-23 - 14:05	KunihiroNagano
jpg	forApp_LPTvsmu_newlab.jpg	r1	manage	380.2 K	2012-01-23 - 14:05	KunihiroNagano
pdf	forApp_LPTvsmu_newlab.pdf	r1	manage	20.5 K	2012-01-23 - 14:06	KunihiroNagano
jpg	forApp_eta_newlab.jpg	r1	manage	414.0 K	2012-01-23 - 13:46	KunihiroNagano
pdf	forApp_eta_newlab.pdf	r1	manage	24.1 K	2012-01-23 - 13:46	KunihiroNagano
jpg	forApp_phi_newlab.jpg	r1	manage	394.8 K	2012-01-23 - 13:55	KunihiroNagano
pdf	forApp_phi_newlab.pdf	r1	manage	20.7 K	2012-01-23 - 13:55	KunihiroNagano
jpg	forApp_pt_rebin_newlab.jpg	r1	manage	416.9 K	2012-01-23 - 13:46	KunihiroNagano
pdf	forApp_pt_rebin_newlab.pdf	r1	manage	17.5 K	2012-01-23 - 13:46	KunihiroNagano
eps	mu10.eps	r1	manage	13.3 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu10.png	r1	manage	107.7 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu10b.eps	r1	manage	12.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu10b.png	r1	manage	102.9 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu10e.eps	r1	manage	13.5 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu10e.png	r1	manage	110.0 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu15.eps	r1	manage	11.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu15.png	r1	manage	95.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu15b.eps	r1	manage	13.2 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu15b.png	r1	manage	99.4 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu15e.eps	r1	manage	13.0 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu15e.png	r1	manage	107.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu20.eps	r1	manage	12.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu20.png	r1	manage	101.4 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu20b.eps	r1	manage	14.3 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu20b.png	r1	manage	102.4 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
eps	mu20e.eps	r1	manage	12.6 K	2013-04-23 - 11:15	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
png	mu20e.png	r1	manage	104.7 K	2013-04-23 - 11:17	MichelaBiglietti	L1 Muon Rates
jpg	muFastEfficiencyBarrel_lvl1.jpg	r1	manage	302.8 K	2011-12-08 - 07:42	KunihiroNagano
pdf	muFastEfficiencyBarrel_lvl1.pdf	r1	manage	37.0 K	2011-11-15 - 11:11	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast efficiency in the barrel region for 2011 data
jpg	muFastEfficiencyEndcap_lvl1.jpg	r1	manage	314.1 K	2011-12-08 - 07:43	KunihiroNagano
pdf	muFastEfficiencyEndcap_lvl1.pdf	r1	manage	37.3 K	2011-11-15 - 11:13	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast efficiency in the endcap region for 2011 data
jpg	muFastExecutionTime.jpg	r1	manage	309.6 K	2011-12-08 - 07:40	KunihiroNagano
pdf	muFastExecutionTime.pdf	r1	manage	34.9 K	2011-11-15 - 10:52	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast online execution time
jpg	muFastResolution.jpg	r1	manage	236.6 K	2011-12-08 - 07:41	KunihiroNagano
pdf	muFastResolution.pdf	r1	manage	33.0 K	2011-11-15 - 11:07	AlessandroDiMattia	MuFast pT resolution on 2011 data
eps	ptec_6_2.eps	r1	manage	9.8 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw
pdf	ptec_6_2.pdf	r1	manage	14.4 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw
png	ptec_6_2.png	r1	manage	21.4 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw
eps	slices_6_2.eps	r1	manage	50.1 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw
pdf	slices_6_2.pdf	r1	manage	29.3 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw
png	slices_6_2.png	r1	manage	43.7 K	2017-07-29 - 10:22	SavannaMarieShaw

Topic revision: r35 - 2018-08-26 - JoergStelzer

Account
- Log In

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
Atlas All webs

Edit
Attach

Copyright &© 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback