# Introduction

The plots shown below have been approved by the NSW Project and may be shown by ATLAS speakers at conferences. Do not add plots on your own but contact the NSW project leader to arrange a plot approval.

## Plot Approval Procedure

Plots and data concerning NSW detector performance, including test beam and/or module-0 results, can only be shown publicly if approved. Plots/results are approved by the NSW project leader after a discussion in the NSW Steering Group. Before requesting the approval of a plot, it should be presented, discussed and agreed on in the appropriate community, eg using the MicroMegas or sTGC Weekly meetings.

The official plot approval procedure is in place since October 2014, it was defined together with and endorsed by the Muon IB in its session on October 16 2014.

# Technical Design Report

Here is the Technical Design Report from 2013. The link also provides access to the individual figures of the TDR.

# Conference Contributions

Here is a list of Muon System talks given at conferences.

Here is a list of NSW, sTGC and MM talks given at conferences.

# MicroMegas Results and Plots

## MM Chamber Construction

### Public Plots

 Fig. 1: Here goes the plot title/short content description and the upload date And here goes the detailed and background information

## MM Performance

### Public Plots

 In the following, performance studies of Micromegas detectors performed with test-beams on several small (10x10 cm2) / medium(1x0.5 m2) size resistive chambers will be reported. In particular the chambers that will be referred to are: Tmm type bulk resistive MM(Tmm2,..., 6) with 10 cm x10 cm active area, with strips 150 μm wide and with a pitch of 250 μm. The resistive strips follow the readout strips geometry with resistivity 40 MOhm/cm. The woven stainless steel mesh structure has a wire diameter of 18 μm and is segmented in 400 lines/inch corresponding to a mesh pitch of &approx 63.5 μm. The support pillars have a diameter of 300 μm with a pitch of 2.5 mm. Tmb similar to Tmm type. The support pillars have a diameter of 500 μm with a pitch of 5 mm. T type bulk resistive MM (T1,..., T8) with 10 cm x 10 cm active area, readout strips 300 μm wide with 400 μm pitch. The resistive strips follow the readout strips geometry with resistivity 20 MOhm/cm. The woven stainless steel mesh structure has a wire diameter of 18 μm and is segmented in 400 lines/inch corresponding to a mesh pitch of 63.5μm. The drift electrode had also a mesh structure with a density of 325 lines/inch (wires of 30 μm diameter with a pitch of 80 μm). TQF chamber similar to T type but with four areas of different resistive strip pattern with respect to the readout strips (normal, half pitch offset, -1 degree and +2 degrees rotation). The resistivity is a bit lower than the T 10 MOhm/cm MMSW (MM for the Small Wheel): the first 4-layers prototype, 1 m x 0.5 m, in a configuration similar to that of the MM for the NSW. It has two planes with parallel strips (precision) and two planes with (stereo) strips rotated by (+/-) 1.5 degrees with respect to the precision ones for second coordinate measurement. The strip pitch is 415 μm and it has a "floating mesh" as opposed to the bulk technique. The mesh structure has a wire diameter of 30 μm and a pitch of 80 μm. The resistivity used in the resistive strips is 10 MOhm/cm. All chambers have a 5 mm drift gap and a 128 μm amplification gap. When not explicitly specified the chambers were operated with a gas mixture of Ar+7%CO2, a drift electrical field of 600 V/cm and an amplification HV in the range 540-580 V corresponding to a gain roughly 10000. The chambers are always readout with APV25 chips connected to the SRS system.

 Fig. 1: Integrated charge for one APV channel for a single event Typical integrated charge from one MicroMegas strip readout with the APV25 hybrid cards (through the Scalable Readout System) operated at 40 MHz with 27 samples. A fit with a Fermi-Dirac function with an additional baseline is performed to determine the strip-hit time, which is defined as the inflection point of the fitted function. Strip-hit charge is measured in the anlayses from the maximum of this distribution or from the plateau of the FD function, in both cases subtracting the fitted baseline.

 Fig. 2: Event display (μTPC and Centroid) Display of an event acquired with chamber T4 on particles with a 30 degrees inclination during a test beam at H4. (Bottom) charge read by each of the strips. (Top) reconstructed centroid and μTPC track.

 Fig. 3: Efficiency map 2D hit reconstruction in a Tmm chamber during a high statistics run. For this study the chamber was kept perpendicular to the beam axis. The hit position in both X and Y readouts is calculated using the centroid method and only events with a single cluster per readout (perpendicular tracks) are used. The inefficient spots appearing every 2.5 mm, corresponding to the pillar structure supporting the mesh of the chamber, are visible. Four different representations of the same plot are shown. The measurements were performed with a Tmm type MM bulk resistive chamber operated with an amplification voltage of HVamp = 540 V. The data were acquired during PS/T9 with a 10 GeV/c π+/p beam.

 Fig. 4: Efficiency map Hit reconstruction efficiency as a function of the extrapolated reference track hit position for a 2D readout chamber of Tmm type. The reference track is reconstructed from 3 Tmm chambers and is then extrapolated to the fourth Tmm under study. Left column corresponds to X and right column corresponds to Y. The first row shows the efficiency for an irradiated area 20 mm wide. The efficiency dips 15% appearing every 2.5 mm correspond to the pillar structure supporting the mesh. The second row focuses only on selected areas on the Y readout of the chamber which are around the pillar region (bands 500μm). The effect of the pillars is more severe in these regions reaching local efficiency dips of the order of 40%. By scanning only the region in between the pillars the efficiency is uniform along the readout channels and a high efficiency is measured for both layers (above 98%). The Y readout shows higher efficiency owing to the fact that it is right below the resistive strips and thus it accumulates more charge than the X layer. The measurements were performed with a Tmm type MM bulk resistive chamber operated with an amplification voltage of HVamp = 540 V. The data were acquired during PS/T9 with a 10 GeV/c π+/p beam.

 Fig. 5: Efficiency map Hit reconstruction efficiency as a function of the extrapolated reference track hit for 2 small T type bulk resistive MM chambers namely TQF, T2. The reference track is reconstructed from 4 Tmm chambers and is then extrapolated to the chamber under study. The two plots on the left correspond to data acquried with the chambers perpendicular to the beam axis while for the two right plots the chambers were inclined by 30 degrees. In both cases the centroid method is used for the reconstruction of the hits. The efficiency dips (5%) appearing every 5 and 2.5 mm respectively correspond to the pillar structure supporting the mesh. The pitch between the pillars and their size are different for the two chambers under study as it is evident from the plots. The TQF chamber has 500 μm wide pillars with a pitch of 5 mm while the T2 pillars are $300μm wide with a pitch of 2.5 mm. In the case of the inclined chambers the particles traverse the chambers under an angle inducing signal in larger number of strips compared to the 0 degrees case. In this case the efficiency is expected to be unaffected by the pillars as it is shown on the two plots corresponding to the 30 degrees case (above 99%). The measurements were performed with T type MM bulk resistive chambers operated with an amplification voltage HVamp = 540 V. The data were acquired during PS/T10 with a 6 GeV/c π+/p$ beam.

# sTGC Results and Plots

## sTGC Chamber and Wedge Construction

### Public Plots

 Fig. 1: Distribution of the pulse peak values of sTGC strip hits during a typical data acquisition run with X-rays. During the run, the X-ray gun is positioned over the QS3 module of an sTGC wedge. The module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline.

 Fig. 2: Number of strips making up charge clusters during a typical X-ray data acquisition run. During the run, the X-ray gun is positioned over the QS3 module of an sTGC wedge. The module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns). The charge clusters selected for analysis must be made up of neighbour-triggered hits from the outer strips and above-threshold hits from the inner strips which implies a minimum strip multiplicity of 3. Charge clusters with strip-multiplicities below or equal to 5 are used for the analysis of X-ray data.

 Fig. 3: Sum of the pulse peak values of hits making up a charge cluster during a typical X-ray data acquisition run. During the run, the X-ray gun is positioned over the QS3 module of an sTGC wedge. The module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns). Results for charge clusters with strip-multiplicities of 3 to 5 are shown.

 Fig. 4: Centroid position of strip charge clusters during an X-ray run with the collimator removed for strip multiplicities of (a)-(e) 3, (b)-(f) 4 and (c)-(g) 5 as well as for clusters multiplicities (d)-(h) 3 to 5 combined. The raw centroid positions, denoted ycl, are shown in (a-d) and the centroid positions corrected for differential non-linearity (DNL), denoted y'cl, shown in (e-h). The DNL bias is corrected using the formula y'rel = yrel + ΣNi=1 ci / (2πi) sin( 2πiyrel) where y'rel and yrel are the cluster centroid positions relative to the nominal strip edges. An independent correction with N=3 is applied for each strip multiplicity. The coefficients ci used for the correction are obtained based on the distributions of yrel of the run. Only clusters from the strips located in the plateau of the X-ray irradiation profile are shown and used for the calculation of the coefficients ci. The pink dashed lines highlight the nominal edges of the strips. During the run, the module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns).

 Fig. 5: Cluster centroid position relative to the strip edges, denoted yrel, during an X-ray run without collimator for strip-multiplicities of (a) 3, (b) 4 and (c) 5. The distributions are fitted to the sum of cosines f(yrel) = 1 + ΣNi=1 ci cos( 2πi yrel) with N=3. The fitted coefficients ci are used to correct the differential non-linearity bias of runs with collimator. Only clusters from strips located in the plateau of the X-ray irradiation profile are shown and used for the calculation of the coefficients ci. During the run, the module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns).

 Fig. 6: Centroid position of strip charge clusters during a typical X-ray run with collimator for strip multiplicities of (a)-(e) 3, (b)-(f) 4 and (c)-(g) 5 as well as for clusters multiplicities (d)-(h) 3 to 5 combined. The raw centroid positions, denoted ycl, are shown in (a-d) and the centroid positions corrected for differential non-linearity (DNL), denoted y'cl, shown in (e-h). The DNL bias is corrected using the formula y'rel = yrel + ΣNi=1 ci/(2πi) sin(2πiyrel) where y'rel and yrel are the cluster centroid positions relative to the nominal strip edges. An independent correction with N=3 is applied for each strip multiplicity. The coefficients ci used for the correction are obtained based on the yrel distributions of runs without collimator. The pink dashed lines highlight the nominal edges of the strips. The distribution of Fig. (h) is fitted to a Gaussian function. The mean parameter μfit of the fitted function is used as the centroid position of the X-ray profile. During the run, the module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns).

 Fig. 7: Centroid position of the X-ray irradiation profile as a function of the position of a micrometric screw pushing the X-ray gun perpendicularly to the strips over the surface of an sTGC wedge. The X-ray gun is inserted in the holder piece. A square edge is glued to the surface of the wedge to guide the movement of the holder. The charge clusters making up the irradiation profile are corrected for differential non-linearity using correction coefficients obtained with an X-ray run without the collimator. The measurements are fitted to a first-order polynomial with the slope fixed to unity. The fit residuals, shown in the bottom panel, are consistent with a spatial resolution better than 40 microns. During the run, the module is flushed with pure CO2 and operates at 2.925 kV. Hits from the strips of the second gas volume from the top and in the vicinity of the X-ray beam are shown. The sTGC module under test is read out with VMM3a ASICs mounted on strip front-end boards (sFEB) rev. 2.1. The VMM3a is configured with neighbour triggering enabled, a gain of 1.0 mV/fC and an integration time of 50 ns. The voltage threshold of the electronic channels is tuned on a channel-by-channel basis to be 20 mV above the voltage baseline. Charge clusters are defined as a collection of contiguous strip hits read out within a time window of 3 BCID (75 ns).

 Fig. 8: Pictures of the equipment used for the X-ray test. Top left: X-ray gun inserted in the holder piece and the base plate. Top right: Drawing of the X-ray gun holder. Bottom left: Source plate for the NSW alignment system. Bottom right: Brass collimator inserted in the tip of the gun. The tip of the gun is screwed in the gun body.

 Fig. 9: Photograph of the interlocked test area used to carry out X-ray measurements.

 Fig. 10: Photograph of the setup used to measure the intrinsic spatial resolution of the technique using a micrometric screw. A square angle is glued on the surface of the wedge to guide the holder piece in a perpendicular direction with respect to the strips. The micrometric screw is also glued on the wedge and is used to push the holder by a known distance.

## sTGC Performance

### Public Plots

 Fig. 2: Inclusive sTGC residual The reference track is built from all four hits in the sTGC quadruplet. Fig. 2: Exclusive sTGC residual The reference track is built from three hits in the sTGC quadruplet, excluding the first hit for which the residual is computed. Fig. 2: sTGC residual The reference track is built from hits in three pixel layers before and after the sTGC quadruplet. Fig. 3: Intrinsic strip spatial resolution measured at the H8 beam line, without the near-neighbour logic In-situ measurement of the sTGC strip spatial resolution as a function of the applied high-voltage using a low-rate muon beam in the H8 beam-test area at CERN using three layers of a QS3P module during 2018. Fig. 4: Charge distribution from a sTGC pad at (a) the H8 beam line for the QS3 module The sTGC pad charge distribution (PDO) for different values of applied high-voltage using a low-rate muon beam in the H8 beam-test area at CERN with a QS3P detector during 2018. Fig. 5: Charge distribution from a sTGC pad at the GIF++ facility for the QL1 module The sTGC pad charge PDO distribution (normalised) for different background rates, as measured in GIF++ using a muon beam in the presence of high rate photon background in GIF++ at CERN with a QL1 detector during 2018.

## sTGC Results from Cosmic Rays Data

 Fig. 6: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. Exclusive \emph{test tracks} are reconstructed using all wire and strip hits of the tested module excluding hits from the tested layer. The efficiency of a strip is defined as the fraction of test tracks pointing at the strip that are accompagnied with a hit on the strip. The large drops in efficiency are explained by the five 7-mm wide wire supports which lay parallel to the strip inside the gas volume. Likewise the moderate drops in efficiency between the wire supports are explained by the presence of button supports.

 Fig. 7: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. The surface of the gas volume is divided in test bins. All test bins have the same dimensions except for 5 rows of bins whose height is tuned to fully cover the wire supports. Exclusive \emph{test tracks} are reconstructed using all wire and strip hits of the tested module excluding hits from the tested layer. The efficiency associated to a test bin is defined as the fraction of test tracks pointing at the bin that are accompagnied with a strip hit in the vincinity of the bin. The narrow inneficient regions correspond to the five 7-mm wide wire supports which lie parallel to the strip inside the gas volume.

 Fig. 8: Data for a QL2C module read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. The noise is the RMS of the baseline voltage of the strip channels measured at the monitor output of the VMM3. The oscilloscope is setup with a time window of microseconds and in AC coupling mode during the measurement. The direct voltage measurements and RMS calculation are done using an oscilloscope.

 Fig. 9: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards..

 Fig. 10: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. Neighbour triggered hits are included in the histogram.

 Fig. 11: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards.

 Fig. 12: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. Charge clusters are made up of hits from contiguous cathode strips of a layer. Due to neighbour triggering, the strip multiplicity is typically larger or equal to 3. Neighbour triggered hits with a peak value below baseline are nevertheless rejected which can reduce the multiplicity. Charge clusters on the edges of a strip board can also have a multiplicity lower than 3.

 Fig. 13: Data for a QL2C module tested with cosmic rays at McGill University. During the test, the module is placed horizontally between two layers of plastic scintillator detectors that trigger on the passage of muons. Data acquisition is triggered by the coincidence of signals from the two scintillator layers. The total data taking time is approximately one day. The module is read out with VMM3 ASICs fitted on prototype front-end boards. Charge clusters are made up of hits from contiguous cathode strips of a layer. The total charge of a cluster is the sum of the peak values of the strip hits making up the cluster after pedestal subtraction.

# Combined Results and Plots

 Fig. 1: Here goes the plot title/short content description and the upload date And here goes the detailed and background information

# Electronics

 Fig. 1: Performance of sTGC serializer: "Eye" diagram The sTGC trigger data serializer (TDS) ASIC chip is responsible for the preparation of trigger data for both pads and strips with additional task of serializing data for transmission to the circuits on the rim of the NSW detector. The serializer is realized in IBM 130 nm CMOS technology. It is adapted from the CERN GBT serializer, with changed architecture from loading 120 bits at 40 MHz to loading 30 bits in parallel at 160 MHz. The serial output is at 4.8 Gbps. The eye diagram is evaluated in a 12.5 GHz bandwidth, 50 GS/s oscilloscope with a PRBS-31 pattern. The height of the eye is measured to be about 540 mV, and the width is about 180.3 ps. Jitter analysis shows that the total jitter at a bit-error-ratio (BER) of 1E-12 is 49.7 ps. A BER test with embedded PRBS checker inside a Xilinx 7 FPGA was also performed. An error free running of three days has been achieved, which corresponds to a BER less than 1 E-15.

-- Main.Stephanie.Zimmermann - 2014-10-31

Responsible: BeateHeinemann
Subject: public

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
pdf pdo_all.pdf r1 manage 14.1 K 2020-04-23 - 09:40 BenoitLefebvre
pdf ql2c7-pdo-wires.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
pdf ql2c7-raw-cluster-size.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:57 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 cluster size
pdf ql2c7-pdo-pads.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
pdf ql2c7-pdo-strips.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
pdf spatial_resolution_utpc_beforeaftercor_atlasnsw.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas resolution for T chamber type with utpc before and after the refinement of the method
pdf ql2c7-sum-pdo-strips.pdf r1 manage 14.6 K 2020-12-03 - 18:58 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 strips cluster PDO
pdf angle_10deg_aftercor.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas angular distribution for 10 degrees
pdf reco_angle_beforeaftercor_errors.pdf r1 manage 15.7 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas reconstructed angle before and after the utpc refinement
pdf angle_20deg_aftercor.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas angular distribution for 20 degrees
pdf Cluster_charge_meanONOFF.pdf r1 manage 15.9 K 2020-12-03 - 12:38 MauroIodice Mean Micromegas cluster charge vs the incident angle
pdf angle_40deg_aftercor.pdf r1 manage 15.9 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas angular distribution for 40 degrees
pdf angle_30deg_aftercor.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas angular distribution for 30 degrees
pdf display3.pdf r1 manage 16.3 K 2015-05-20 - 17:13 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas track evt display
pdf Cluster_widthONOFF.pdf r1 manage 16.5 K 2020-12-03 - 12:51 MauroIodice Cluster width Vs angle
pdf ql2c7-eff-strips-1D.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2020-12-03 - 18:45 MauroIodice sTGC strips Efficiency
pdf ql2c7-noise-strips-2D.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2020-12-03 - 18:55 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 noise map
pdf ql2c7-noise-strips-1D.pdf r1 manage 17.2 K 2020-12-03 - 18:54 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 strip noise
pdf spatial_resolution_tmm_tmb_y.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas resolution for Tmm chamber type (Y readout)
pdf ql2c7-eff-strips-2D.pdf r1 manage 17.7 K 2020-12-03 - 18:54 MauroIodice sTGC efficiency map
pdf spatial_resolution_tmm_tmb_x.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas resolution for Tmm chamber type (X readout)
pdf residuals_t2_t4_H4.pdf r1 manage 18.1 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas resolution for T chamber type
pdf spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer1layer2.pdf r1 manage 18.3 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas MMSW precision coordinate resolution (layer1-layer2)
pdf spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer1layer34.pdf r1 manage 18.3 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas MMSW precision coordinate resolution using the stereo strips(layer1-layer34)
pdf efficiency_tqf_t2_centroid_30degtracks_angletext.pdf r1 manage 18.6 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map for 30 degrees inclination angle
pdf spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer2layer34.pdf r1 manage 18.7 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas MMSW precision coordinate resolution using the stereo strips (layer2-layer34)
pdf spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer34ytmm6y.pdf r1 manage 18.8 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas MMSW second coordinate resolution using the stereo strips
pdf Cluster_width_vs_HV.pdf r1 manage 18.9 K 2020-12-03 - 12:55 MauroIodice Cluster width Vs HV
pdf Mean_cluster_charge_vs_HV.pdf r1 manage 18.9 K 2020-12-03 - 12:56 MauroIodice Cluster charge Vs HV
png mm_single_plane_spatial_resolution.png r1 manage 19.1 K 2014-11-18 - 01:37 OliverStelzerChilton MM single plane spatial resolution vs incident angle
pdf Efficiency_vs_HV.pdf r1 manage 19.2 K 2020-12-03 - 12:57 MauroIodice Efficiency Vs HV
pdf efficiency_tqf_t2_centroid_perpendiculartracks_angletext.pdf r1 manage 19.5 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map for 0 degrees inclination angle
pdf apv.pdf r1 manage 28.5 K 2015-05-20 - 17:17 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas APV integrated charge single channel example
pdf Efficiency_Layer6.pdf r1 manage 30.5 K 2020-12-03 - 12:56 MauroIodice Efficiency map Layer 6
pdf efficiency_tmm_pillarregions_centroid_perpendiculartracks.pdf r1 manage 31.3 K 2015-05-20 - 16:52 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map for different regions with respect to the pillars
pdf apv_function.pdf r1 manage 33.2 K 2015-05-20 - 17:17 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas APV integrated charge single channel example
png mmsw_precision_coordinate.png r1 manage 36.3 K 2014-11-18 - 01:39 OliverStelzerChilton MMSW precision coordinate resolution
pdf phiError.pdf r1 manage 38.9 K 2015-05-21 - 10:47 KonstantinosNtekas MC expectation for second coordinate resolution with stereo strips
png mmsw_second_coordinate.png r1 manage 41.1 K 2014-11-18 - 01:39 OliverStelzerChilton MMSW second coordinate resolution
png sTGC_residual_pixel.png r1 manage 45.5 K 2014-11-19 - 19:57 OliverStelzerChilton sTGC residual with respect to a pixel track
png gamma_ageing.png r1 manage 61.3 K 2015-07-01 - 18:56 MarcoVanadia Micromegas ageing studies with gamma-rays
jpg screw_setup.jpg r1 manage 62.5 K 2020-04-23 - 10:56 BenoitLefebvre
png xray_ageing.png r1 manage 80.2 K 2015-07-01 - 18:43 MarcoVanadia Micromegas ageing studies with x-rays
png sum_pdo.png r1 manage 87.2 K 2020-04-23 - 10:09 BenoitLefebvre
png efficiency_tqf_t2_centroid_30degtracks_angletext.png r1 manage 88.6 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png pdo_all.png r1 manage 91.0 K 2020-04-23 - 09:44 BenoitLefebvre
png Cluster_widthONOFF.png r1 manage 91.9 K 2020-12-03 - 17:30 MauroIodice Micromegas Cluster width Vs angle
png neutron_ageing.png r1 manage 95.1 K 2015-07-01 - 18:52 MarcoVanadia Micromegas ageing studies with neutrons
png efficiency_tqf_t2_centroid_perpendiculartracks_angletext.png r1 manage 95.3 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png ql2c7-pdo-wires.png r1 manage 96.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
png ql2c7-eff-strips-1D.png r1 manage 102.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:45 MauroIodice sTGC strips Efficiency
png ql2c7-noise-strips-1D.png r1 manage 102.8 K 2020-12-03 - 18:54 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 strip noise
jpg test_area.jpg r1 manage 103.2 K 2020-04-23 - 10:55 BenoitLefebvre
png ql2c7-pdo-pads.png r1 manage 104.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
png phiError.png r1 manage 104.9 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png angle_10deg_aftercor.png r1 manage 105.1 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png ql2c7-eff-strips-2D.png r1 manage 105.1 K 2020-12-03 - 18:54 MauroIodice sTGC efficiency map
png ql2c7-noise-strips-2D.png r1 manage 107.3 K 2020-12-03 - 18:55 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 noise map
png spatial_resolution_utpc_beforeaftercor_atlasnsw.png r1 manage 110.0 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png ql2c7-pdo-strips.png r1 manage 110.1 K 2020-12-03 - 18:56 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 PDO
png ql2c7-sum-pdo-strips.png r1 manage 110.1 K 2020-12-03 - 18:58 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 strips cluster PDO
png angle_20deg_aftercor.png r1 manage 112.3 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png ql2c7-raw-cluster-size.png r1 manage 114.0 K 2020-12-03 - 18:57 MauroIodice sTGC ql2c7 cluster size
png angle_40deg_aftercor.png r1 manage 116.7 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png sTGC_standalone_residuals_inc.png r1 manage 116.8 K 2014-11-19 - 01:26 OliverStelzerChilton sTGC standalone inclusive resolution
png angle_30deg_aftercor.png r1 manage 118.6 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png display3.png r1 manage 124.4 K 2015-05-21 - 18:52 KonstantinosNtekas
png apv.png r1 manage 126.6 K 2015-05-21 - 18:52 KonstantinosNtekas
png Efficiency_Layer6.png r1 manage 127.4 K 2020-12-03 - 17:32 MauroIodice Micromegas Layer 6 Efficiency
png reco_angle_beforeaftercor_errors.png r1 manage 129.5 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png cluster_size.png r1 manage 129.6 K 2020-04-23 - 09:50 BenoitLefebvre
png sTGC_standalone_residuals_exc.png r1 manage 131.6 K 2014-11-19 - 01:26 OliverStelzerChilton sTGC standalone exclusive resolution
png yrel_no_collimator.png r1 manage 136.2 K 2020-04-23 - 10:40 BenoitLefebvre
png intrinsic_sp.png r1 manage 137.1 K 2020-05-14 - 11:09 DenisPudzha
png Mean_cluster_charge_vs_HV.png r1 manage 147.6 K 2020-12-03 - 17:31 MauroIodice Micromegas cluster charge vs HV
png Cluster_width_vs_HV.png r1 manage 149.8 K 2020-12-03 - 17:29 MauroIodice Micromegas Cluster width Vs HV
png spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer1layer34.png r1 manage 151.1 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png Efficiency_vs_HV.png r1 manage 153.8 K 2020-12-03 - 17:32 MauroIodice Micromegas Efficiency Vs HV
png spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer1layer2.png r1 manage 154.6 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer34ytmm6y.png r1 manage 160.3 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png spatial_resolution_mmsw1_layer2layer34.png r1 manage 162.3 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png spatial_resolution_tmm_tmb_y.png r1 manage 162.5 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png apv_function.png r1 manage 163.8 K 2015-05-21 - 18:52 KonstantinosNtekas
png residuals_t2_t4_H4.png r1 manage 168.7 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png spatial_resolution_tmm_tmb_x.png r1 manage 172.4 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png pdo_1.png r1 manage 193.6 K 2020-05-14 - 11:09 DenisPudzha
png ypos_collimator.png r1 manage 233.7 K 2020-04-23 - 10:52 BenoitLefebvre
png efficiency_tmm_pillarregions_centroid_perpendiculartracks.png r1 manage 238.0 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
pdf tmm2_pillars_colz.pdf r1 manage 261.6 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map from 2d hit reconstruction (col1)
png sTGC_serializer_performance.png r1 manage 271.4 K 2014-12-01 - 19:50 OliverStelzerChilton sTGC serializer performance
png ypos_no_collimator.png r1 manage 301.3 K 2020-04-23 - 10:14 BenoitLefebvre
png pdo_2.png r1 manage 314.2 K 2020-05-14 - 11:09 DenisPudzha
png tmm_pillarseffect_centroid_perpendiculartracks_aligned.png r1 manage 346.4 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
jpg xray_equipment.jpg r1 manage 352.4 K 2020-04-23 - 10:55 BenoitLefebvre
png screw.png r1 manage 377.4 K 2020-04-23 - 10:52 BenoitLefebvre
pdf tmm_pillarseffect_centroid_perpendiculartracks_aligned.pdf r1 manage 473.1 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas effect of the pillars (bias) on the hit reconstruction
png tmm2_pillars_colz.png r1 manage 660.0 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
pdf tmm2_pillars_colz3.pdf r1 manage 816.1 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map from 2d hit reconstruction (col2)
pdf tmm2_pillars_scatter.pdf r1 manage 843.1 K 2015-05-20 - 16:55 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map from 2d hit reconstruction (scatterplot)
pdf tmm2_pillars_colz_log_newaxes.pdf r1 manage 1273.0 K 2015-05-20 - 16:54 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas efficiency map from 2d hit reconstruction (col3)
png tmm2_pillars_colz_log_newaxes.png r1 manage 1273.8 K 2015-05-21 - 18:27 KonstantinosNtekas
png tmm2_pillars_colz3.png r1 manage 1359.7 K 2015-05-21 - 18:45 KonstantinosNtekas
jpg H6_hd.jpg r1 manage 2521.4 K 2015-05-20 - 17:46 KonstantinosNtekas Micromegas TB photo
Topic revision: r23 - 2020-12-03 - MauroIodice

 Account
 Cern Search TWiki Search Google Search Atlas All webs
Copyright &© 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback