Charged particle multiplicity in HI collisions at 2.76 TeV

Introduction

Introduction

This page describes the histograms approved to show in the 2011 Quark Matter Conference for charged particle multiplicity measurement at 2.76 TeV.

$\Delta \phi$ vs $\Delta \eta$ for all layer-0 and layer-1 pixel clusters pairs $\Delta \phi$ vs $\Delta \eta$ for all layer-0 and layer-1 pixel cluster pairs for Minbias events. $\Delta \eta$ and $\Delta \phi$ are defined as layer-0 cluster $\eta$ or $\phi$ minus layer-1 cluster $\eta$ or $\phi$ correspondingly. The black line shows the selection criteria for selecting tracklets candidates at $\|\eta\|=1$ . Cluster pairs within the black line are selected as tracklet candidates. The $\eta$ dependent selection criteria is denoted by this formula: $\Delta {\mathcal R} \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{\left(\frac{\Delta \eta}{\sigma_\eta(\eta)}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\Delta \phi}{\sigma_\phi(\eta)}\right)^2} < 3$ .	*APPROVED* eps file

$\Delta \phi$ vs $\Delta \eta$ for all layer-0 and layer-1 pixel clusters pairs
$\Delta \phi$ vs $\Delta \eta$ for all layer-0 and layer-1 pixel cluster pairs for Minbias events. $\Delta \eta$ and $\Delta \phi$ are defined as layer-0 cluster $\eta$ or $\phi$ minus layer-1 cluster $\eta$ or $\phi$ correspondingly. The black line shows the selection criteria for selecting tracklets candidates at $|\eta|=1$ . Cluster pairs within the black line are selected as tracklet candidates. The $\eta$ dependent selection criteria is denoted by this formula: $\Delta {\mathcal R} \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \sqrt{\left(\frac{\Delta \eta}{\sigma_\eta(\eta)}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\Delta \phi}{\sigma_\phi(\eta)}\right)^2} < 3$ .

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-9.png

APPROVED eps file

Occupancy variable used to match MC to data (\|η\|<1) Distribution of occupancy variable $dn_{clus}^{0}/d\eta (\|\eta\|<1)/2$ for data. This variable is used to match data and MC. This variable divides events into 20 different occupant categories.	*APPROVED* eps file

Occupancy variable used to match MC to data (|η|<1)
Distribution of occupancy variable $dn_{clus}^{0}/d\eta (|\eta|<1)/2$ for data. This variable is used to match data and MC. This variable divides events into 20 different occupant categories.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-19.png

APPROVED eps file

Comparison of data and Monte Carlo with tracklets $\Delta \eta$ and $\Delta \phi$ distributions Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ (left) and $\Delta \phi$ (right) from data (black line) and MC (yellow shaded) with tracklets from two $\eta$ range: $\|\eta\|<1.0$ (top) and $1<\|\eta\|<2$ (bottom) for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.	*APPROVED* eps file

Comparison of data and Monte Carlo with tracklets $\Delta \eta$ and $\Delta \phi$ distributions
Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ (left) and $\Delta \phi$ (right) from data (black line) and MC (yellow shaded) with tracklets from two $\eta$ range: $|\eta|<1.0$ (top) and $1<|\eta|<2$ (bottom) for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/paper_detadphi_v1.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ from data and MC Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ from data and MC
Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \eta$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-1.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \phi$ from data and MC Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \phi$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \phi$ from data and MC
Distribution of tracklets $\Delta \phi$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-10.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of pixel tracks $d_{0}$ from data and MC Distribution of pixel tracks $d_{0}$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of pixel tracks $d_{0}$ from data and MC
Distribution of pixel tracks $d_{0}$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-0.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of pixel tracks $z_{0}\sin(\theta)$ from data and MC Distribution of pixel tracks $z_{0}\sin(\theta)$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of pixel tracks $z_{0}\sin(\theta)$ from data and MC
Distribution of pixel tracks $z_{0}\sin(\theta)$ from data and MC for the 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Top: data (black) and MC (yellow) overlay together. Bottom: Ratio of MC to data. A pT re-weighting procedure was applied to MC samples.

APPROVED eps file

Number of tracklets from Method 2 vs FCal ET (1<\|η\|<2) Number of tracklets from method 2 in $\|\eta\|<1.0$ normalized by $\eta$ coverage vs the forward calorimeter transverse energy distribution. The red points are from signal events, the black points are from flipped events, and the blue points are signal events subtracted by flipped events.	*APPROVED* eps file

Number of tracklets from Method 2 vs FCal ET (1<|η|<2)
Number of tracklets from method 2 in $|\eta|<1.0$ normalized by $\eta$ coverage vs the forward calorimeter transverse energy distribution. The red points are from signal events, the black points are from flipped events, and the blue points are signal events subtracted by flipped events.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-7.png

APPROVED eps file

Raw tracklets $\eta$ distribution from Method 1 Raw two-point tracklet $1/N_{evt} dN_{trkl}/d\eta$ distribution in 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb collisions from Method 1 for 8 different centrality selections.	*APPROVED* eps file

Raw tracklets $\eta$ distribution from Method 1
Raw two-point tracklet $1/N_{evt} dN_{trkl}/d\eta$ distribution in 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb collisions from Method 1 for 8 different centrality selections.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-20.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ . The error bar on each point shows the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty from the $dn/d\eta$ measurement, the shaded band shows the total statisical and systematic uncertainty including the uncertainties on $N_{part}$ .	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$
Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ . The error bar on each point shows the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty from the $dn/d\eta$ measurement, the shaded band shows the total statisical and systematic uncertainty including the uncertainties on $N_{part}$ .

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-5.png

APPROVED eps file

Charged particle multiplicity collision energy dependence and $N_{part}$ dependence Top: Collision energy dependence of $dn/d\eta$ per colliding nucleon pair, $N_{part}$ /2, from a variety of measurements in proton-proton and central nuclear nucelar collisions including the 0-6\% reported here for $\|\eta\|<0.5$ and the previous 0-5 $\%$ ALICE measurement (point shifted horizontally for clarity). The curves show different expectations for the collision energy dependence of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ in nuclear nuclear collisions: dotted - results of a Landau hydrodynamics calculation , dashed - a $\sqrt{s}^{0.15}$ extrapolation of RHIC and SPS data proposed by ALICE, dot-dashed - a logarithmic extrapolation of RHIC and SPS data. Bottom: $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ evaluated over $\|\eta\| < 0.5$ vs $N_{part}$ for 2 $\%$ centrality intervals over 0-20 $\%$ and 5 $\%$ centrality intervals over 20-80 $\%$ . Error bars represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties on the \dndetamid\ measurement, the shaded band represents the total systematic uncertainty including $N_{part}$ uncertainties. The RHIC measurements have been multiplied by 2.15 to allow comparison with the $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV results. }	*APPROVED* eps file

Charged particle multiplicity collision energy dependence and $N_{part}$ dependence
Top: Collision energy dependence of $dn/d\eta$ per colliding nucleon pair, $N_{part}$ /2, from a variety of measurements in proton-proton and central nuclear nucelar collisions including the 0-6\% reported here for $|\eta|<0.5$ and the previous 0-5 $\%$ ALICE measurement (point shifted horizontally for clarity). The curves show different expectations for the collision energy dependence of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ in nuclear nuclear collisions: dotted - results of a Landau hydrodynamics calculation , dashed - a $\sqrt{s}^{0.15}$ extrapolation of RHIC and SPS data proposed by ALICE, dot-dashed - a logarithmic extrapolation of RHIC and SPS data. Bottom: $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ evaluated over $|\eta| < 0.5$ vs $N_{part}$ for 2 $\%$ centrality intervals over 0-20 $\%$ and 5 $\%$ centrality intervals over 20-80 $\%$ . Error bars represent combined statistical and systematic uncertainties on the \dndetamid\ measurement, the shaded band represents the total systematic uncertainty including $N_{part}$ uncertainties. The RHIC measurements have been multiplied by 2.15 to allow comparison with the $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV results. }

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/paper_dndetaNpart_v10.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ from ATLAS (circle points). The error bar on each point shows the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty from the $dn/d\eta$ measurement, the shaded band shows the total statisical and systematic uncertainty including the uncertainties on $N_{part}$ . Also shown in the figure are measurement from ALICE (star points), RHIC results averaged over four experiments (square), and PHOBOS results (triangle). RHIC and PHOBOS results are scaled up by a factor of 2.15 to match central ATLAS data.	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$
Distribution of $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $N_{part}$ from ATLAS (circle points). The error bar on each point shows the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty from the $dn/d\eta$ measurement, the shaded band shows the total statisical and systematic uncertainty including the uncertainties on $N_{part}$ . Also shown in the figure are measurement from ALICE (star points), RHIC results averaged over four experiments (square), and PHOBOS results (triangle). RHIC and PHOBOS results are scaled up by a factor of 2.15 to match central ATLAS data.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-6.png

APPROVED eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ compared with CGC calculation Distribution of $dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from ATLAS (circle points) for 0-6 $\%$ centrality interval. Shaded band shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties. Also shown is the prediction from CGC calculation [arXiv:1011.3591v1 [hep-ph]] for 0-5 $\%$ (line).	*APPROVED* eps file

Distribution of $dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ compared with CGC calculation
Distribution of $dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from ATLAS (circle points) for 0-6 $\%$ centrality interval. Shaded band shows the combined systematic and statistical uncertainties. Also shown is the prediction from CGC calculation [arXiv:1011.3591v1 [hep-ph]] for 0-5 $\%$ (line).

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-4.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ distribution Left: Top: raw track/tracklet $1/\Nevt dN_{\mathrm{trkl}}/d\eta$ distribution from tracklet Method 1 ( points), tracklet Method 2 (squares) and pixel tracking (blue triangles) for 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Middle: corrected tracklet and track $dn/d\eta$ distributions (same symbol scheme), bottom: ratio of $dn/d\eta$ from the tracklet Method 2 (squares) and pixel tracking ( triangles) to tracklet Method 1 respectively. Right: Final $dn/d\eta$ distributions from tracklet Method 1 for eight 10 $\%$ centrality intervals. Total systematic errors on $1/\Nevt dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta$ are shown as a shaded band.	*APPROVED* eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ distribution
Left: Top: raw track/tracklet $1/\Nevt dN_{\mathrm{trkl}}/d\eta$ distribution from tracklet Method 1 ( points), tracklet Method 2 (squares) and pixel tracking (blue triangles) for 0-10 $\%$ centrality events. Middle: corrected tracklet and track $dn/d\eta$ distributions (same symbol scheme), bottom: ratio of $dn/d\eta$ from the tracklet Method 2 (squares) and pixel tracking ( triangles) to tracklet Method 1 respectively. Right: Final $dn/d\eta$ distributions from tracklet Method 1 for eight 10 $\%$ centrality intervals. Total systematic errors on $1/\Nevt dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta$ are shown as a shaded band.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/paper_dndeta_v7.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $\eta$ Left: $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ measured by ATLAS at $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV compared to similar measurements over $\|\eta\|<5.4$ by PHOBOS at RHIC for 19.6 and 200 GeV. Right: The same data as in the other figure, but with the PHOBOS data shifted such that one of the projectiles has the LHC Pb+Pb per-nucleon beam rapidity.	*APPROVED* eps file

$dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ vs $\eta$
Left: $dn/d\eta/(N_{part}/2)$ measured by ATLAS at $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV compared to similar measurements over $|\eta|<5.4$ by PHOBOS at RHIC for 19.6 and 200 GeV. Right: The same data as in the other figure, but with the PHOBOS data shifted such that one of the projectiles has the LHC Pb+Pb per-nucleon beam rapidity.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-22.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 0-10\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods
Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 0-10\% centrality interval.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-11.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 10-20\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-12.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 20-30\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-13.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 30-40\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-14.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 40-50\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-15.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 50-60\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-16.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 60-70\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-17.png

APPROVED eps file

$dn/d\eta$ vs $\eta$ from three different methods Distributions of $dn/d\eta$ measured by three different methods: Pixel tracking (trigangle), tracklet Method 1(point) and tracklet Method 2(square). Low panel shows the ratio of pixel tracking and Method2 to Method 1 ratio. This shows for 70-80\% centrality interval.	*APPROVED* eps file

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/AtlasPublic/QM2011Multiplicity/a-18.png

APPROVED eps file

Major updates:
-- Main.YujiaoChen - 15-Jun-2011

Responsible: Main.YujiaoChen
Subject: public

auxi_dndetaNpart_phobos.eps: auxi_dndetaNpart_phobos.eps

paper_dndetaNpart_bottom.eps: paper_dndetaNpart_bottom.eps

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
png	a-0.png	r1	manage	42.3 K	2011-06-15 - 19:19	YujiaoChen	d0
png	a-1.png	r1	manage	40.4 K	2011-06-15 - 19:20	YujiaoChen	delta eta
png	a-10.png	r1	manage	41.8 K	2011-06-15 - 19:25	YujiaoChen	Delta phi
png	a-11.png	r1	manage	55.7 K	2011-06-15 - 19:26	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 1
png	a-12.png	r1	manage	52.4 K	2011-06-15 - 19:26	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 2
png	a-13.png	r1	manage	54.6 K	2011-06-15 - 21:24	YujiaoChen
png	a-14.png	r1	manage	51.6 K	2011-06-15 - 19:27	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 3
png	a-15.png	r1	manage	55.4 K	2011-06-15 - 19:27	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 4
png	a-16.png	r1	manage	57.0 K	2011-06-15 - 19:28	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 5
png	a-17.png	r1	manage	54.0 K	2011-06-15 - 19:28	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 6
png	a-18.png	r1	manage	53.1 K	2011-06-15 - 19:29	YujiaoChen	dndeta, 3 methods, cent 7
png	a-19.png	r1	manage	22.0 K	2011-06-15 - 19:29	YujiaoChen	occupancy
png	a-20.png	r1	manage	41.0 K	2011-06-15 - 19:31	YujiaoChen	Raw
png	a-21.png	r1	manage	42.3 K	2011-06-15 - 19:31	YujiaoChen	z0sin(theta)
png	a-22.png	r1	manage	24.7 K	2011-06-15 - 19:33	YujiaoChen
png	a-23.png	r1	manage	38.3 K	2011-06-15 - 19:33	YujiaoChen	dndeta ALICE
png	a-24.png	r1	manage	54.7 K	2011-06-15 - 19:34	YujiaoChen	dndeta raw, corrected, ratio
png	a-3.png	r1	manage	39.1 K	2011-06-15 - 19:21	YujiaoChen	dndeta ratio with error band
png	a-4.png	r1	manage	29.1 K	2011-06-15 - 19:22	YujiaoChen	dndeta compared with CGC calculation
png	a-5.png	r1	manage	27.1 K	2011-06-15 - 19:22	YujiaoChen	dndeta ATLAS
png	a-6.png	r1	manage	45.0 K	2011-06-15 - 19:23	YujiaoChen	dndeta with PHOBOS
png	a-7.png	r1	manage	45.7 K	2011-06-15 - 19:23	YujiaoChen	M2 signal, flipped, signal-flip
png	a-9.png	r1	manage	63.7 K	2011-06-15 - 19:24	YujiaoChen	Detla phi vs Delta eta for layer-0 and layer-1 pixel clusters
eps	auxi_d0TrackPix_run169866vsHijing_ReWeight_cent0.eps	r1	manage	16.6 K	2011-06-15 - 19:32	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_detaM1_Run169866vsHijing_3sigma_Reweight.eps	r1	manage	21.0 K	2011-06-15 - 18:58	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dndEtaRatio_errorBand.eps	r1	manage	21.0 K	2011-06-15 - 18:50	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dndeta0to6CompareCGC.eps	r1	manage	14.8 K	2011-06-15 - 18:50	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dndetaNpartScale_ATLAS.eps	r1	manage	13.8 K	2011-06-15 - 18:57	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dndetaNpart_phobos.eps	r1	manage	25.0 K	2011-06-15 - 18:04	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dndetaTrklEtM2_allThree_corseBin_Run169866_smallsize.eps	r1	manage	133.2 K	2011-06-15 - 18:51	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dphiDetaClus_Run169866_ellipse.eps	r1	manage	478.1 K	2011-06-15 - 18:52	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_dphiM1_Run169866vsHijing_3sigma_Reweight.eps	r1	manage	22.1 K	2011-06-15 - 18:57	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent0.eps	r1	manage	29.7 K	2011-06-15 - 18:56	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent1.eps	r1	manage	28.9 K	2011-06-15 - 18:56	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent2.eps	r1	manage	29.7 K	2011-06-15 - 18:55	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent3.eps	r1	manage	29.6 K	2011-06-15 - 18:55	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent4.eps	r1	manage	29.5 K	2011-06-15 - 21:17	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent5.eps	r1	manage	29.9 K	2011-06-15 - 18:55	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent6.eps	r1	manage	28.7 K	2011-06-15 - 18:54	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_eta_pt0MagOff_m1m2tm_3sigma_tm16_2_1_5_cent7.eps	r1	manage	28.7 K	2011-06-15 - 18:54	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_occupancy_20bins.eps	r1	manage	15.6 K	2011-06-15 - 18:51	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_rawDndetaM1_Run169866_3sigma.eps	r1	manage	31.9 K	2011-06-15 - 18:54	YujiaoChen
eps	auxi_z0sinTrackPix_run169866vsHijing_ReWeight_cent0.eps	r1	manage	16.9 K	2011-06-15 - 18:53	YujiaoChen
eps	limfrag_comp_v6.eps	r1	manage	15.7 K	2011-06-15 - 18:06	YujiaoChen
pdf	paper_detadphi_v1.pdf	r1	manage	40.6 K	2011-06-15 - 18:52	YujiaoChen
png	paper_detadphi_v1.png	r1	manage	124.1 K	2011-06-15 - 19:50	YujiaoChen
eps	paper_dndetaNpart_bottom.eps	r1	manage	21.3 K	2011-06-15 - 18:07	YujiaoChen
pdf	paper_dndetaNpart_v10.pdf	r1	manage	25.2 K	2011-06-15 - 18:52	YujiaoChen
png	paper_dndetaNpart_v10.png	r1	manage	193.4 K	2011-06-15 - 20:34	YujiaoChen
pdf	paper_dndeta_v7.pdf	r1	manage	40.9 K	2011-06-15 - 18:53	YujiaoChen
png	paper_dndeta_v7.png	r1	manage	189.3 K	2011-06-15 - 21:03	YujiaoChen

Topic revision: r1 - 2011-06-15 - YujiaoChen

Account
- Log In

- Cern Search
- TWiki Search
- Google Search
Atlas All webs

Edit
Attach

Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback