CMS Tracker Detector Performance Results

Plots and Results

13TeV Data

8TeV Data

Link to the cluster charge plots (under HLT Tracking Performance plots).

Pixel cluster plots for APS (approved 7.11.2012):

slides with explanations: pdf

individual plots, all clusters are on tracks:

|

imge3fb2e6fac07c20d88ae4b312e72d10f.png
Typical Landau distribution of cluster charge with example fit for MPV
|
img78e6247686b8ecffc08569bf378272b4.png
Cluster size in local X coordinate in number of pixels, typical distribution
|
img6dc057bf0d81e74898953646b5a93e37.png
Cluster size in local Y coordinate in number of pixels, typical distribution
|
img3ee589174608cd2a84b15a7181b98fe3.png
Total cluster size in number of pixels, typical distribution
|
img0d4322a0e26e25d3858d060f4af31c94.png
Mean cluster size in local X and Y coordinates vs. integrated luminosity in 2012
|
img9cd6fd3d1ec1df650b8d77eb48094ba9.png
Mean cluster size vs. integrated luminosity in 2012 for central tracks
|
img2da71b1474c308e3549cbf7212ac7449.png
Mean cluster size vs. integrated luminosity in 2012 for forward tracks
|
img88c99f10fcc43b91ed9f2df48422bba8.png
MPV of cluster charge vs. integrated luminosity in 2012 for central tracks
|
img97ccd4919c8f413537468ca47d3f7c01.png
MPV of cluster charge vs. integrated luminosity in 2012 for forward tracks

Tracker performance plots for VERTEX (approved 11/9/2012):

slides with explanations: pdf

individual plots:

|

img1dcf3f10ead9c00af8766cb6f6d0a4f3.png
Subdetector Signal Vs Delay
|
img876f7aaa5ed68a0774afef26c92d5b1c.png
Optimal Delay Vs Subdetector Layer
|
imgeaf507f544f8eaaf9b45ca3eaa782312.png
Tracker Status Map

Tracker performance plots for ICHEP (approved 27/6/2012):

slides ( pdf),

individual plots: |

img9f167ec6ec4f5499ea23d8856173933b.pdf
Tracker Material in units of radiation length vs. eta
|
img90a796b79377ab0d8b2736bc42c1f08c.pdf
Tracker Material in units of interaction length vs. eta
|
img9162a522041878de6389de66a5f58f5d.png
strip module hit efficiency
|
img43a82c45b4e90062e141b0d2eaa82b33.png
pixel module hit efficiency
|
imga79ef07df53db39c85989663e140beb1.png
pixel barrel resolution in the z coordinate

7TeV Data

Measurement of Pixel hit resolution from early 2011 data based on the Pixel Triplet method. The slides of the approval talk can be found here.

|

imgf9e0ee48ebca770d7774454532b4b4ee.png
Resolution in rphi
img7569b7652b3f7c15030a11a4223e631c.png
Resolution in z vs. DIP angle

Results from the Laser Alignment System in the Strip Tracker using 2011 data. Find the slides from the approval meeting here. They contain a description of the system and supporting plots. Here are the approved plots for the public:

img5c34e13d432cfbbfc60e97b8d5fffbfd.png
TEC+ laser beam profile
img349b504e6ca9f98b5dcba792ceded051.png
TOB laser beam profile
img8f8ca3335131ec0fa103e3670bcab929.png
Online monitoring of calibration events
imga8c182652bcd9981fb8c15e45d1ca397.png
Laser parameter scan for calibration
img967374bed16b80bf35535b6816a65357.png
Stability within a run; changes with respect to last 5 minutes
img8ab23fbd50f9710960f68465e09cc2c8.png
TIB stability projections
img93ac88363c4c8c7ccd63ca82edc01013.png
TEC+ stability projections
img289156d6ac3c997e1f58387053e8f29d.png
TEC- stability projections
img9774aa8d57c01943f012307c4f131e80.png
Individual deviations: torsion in TIB
imgc0d7be174189e059a4b11b02743f03e9.png
Individual deviations: chi2 in TIB
imgf1887c29443b870c60852d9d62218fd0.png
Individual deviations: temperature
imgff3a4ae578d6b7186e89228a82293451.png
Illustration for Lorentz Angle measurement
imgbcfa7cc922ea800c2fbf7553e17532d8.png
Measurement of Lorentz drift during Magnet ramp

On track strip clusters Signal to Noise ratio S/N for each part of the strip tracker, operated in deconvolution mode (nominal conditions). Update of plots approved in 2010.

TIB TOB
18.4 22.4
|
imga571742cbed3a14a9e2581ae95efa54c.gif
TIB S/N
img8d109e85e586268212188cbf2944a7b4.gif
TOB S/N

This is the situation towards the end of the 2010 pp runs, where 10 of the 11 inefficient modules have been recovered.

efficiency end2010.png
Strip efficiency summary
efficiencyMap end2010.png
Strip efficiency tacker map

Contact: Michael Segala, Thomas Speer
Presented for approval on 13 October 2010 at the general meeting: slides
Results from 3.9 pb-1 of data, all resolutions in microns.

Layers pitch Degrees 0-10 Cluster Width 1 Cluster Width 2 Cluster Width 3
TIB 12 80 16.0 +/- 3.5 18.0 +/- 7.6 15.7 +/- 3.1 15.5 +/- 3.6
TIB 34 120 27.9 +/- 2.9 25.5 +/- 4.0 24.8 +/- 3.1 27.0 +/- 3.7
TOB 1234 183 41.3 +/- 3.8 n/a n/a 41.1 +/- 4.3
TOB 56 122 24.5 +/- 2.7 n/a n/a 25.6 +/- 3.3

StripHitRes2.gif
Resolution as a function of strip pitch (eps)
StripHitRes2.gif
Resolution for each sensor type (eps)
StripHitResTrackerMap.png
Tracker Map of resolutions (in microns)

Contact: Loic Quertenmont loic.quertenmont@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Presented for approval on June 23th, 2010 at general Meeting.
More details on the used technique are described in: CMS AN-2010/020.

High Purity Tracks with P>2.0GeV and 8 Single-Sides Hits have been used.

Data MC  
SSTCalibration Data Gain.png
SSTCalibration MC Gain.png
Distribution of the Most Probable Value (extracted) from a Landau fit on the pathlength-corrected Charge Distribution for each SiStrip APV. Mean value of the MPV distribution depends on the thickness of the sensor and of the geometrical position (higher particle spectrum illumination). Effect well visible in MC
Tickmark Calibrated Ticklark+Particle Calibrated Data
SSTCalibration Data Charge Tick.png
SSTCalibration Data Charge Part.png
Pathlength Corrected Charge Distribution for a SiStrip Tracker calibrated for optical response by internal reference signal (tickmark) and for a SiStrip Tracker calibrated with Particles (on top of the previous calibration). The dashed line represent the inter-calibration value (300 ADC/mm) used by the particle gain calibration
Un-calibrated Particle Calibrated MC
SSTCalibration MC Charge Unca.png
SSTCalibration MC Charge Part.png
Pathlength Corrected Charge Distribution for an un-calibrated SiStrip Tracker and for a SiStrip Tracker calibrated with Particles. The dashed line represent the inter-calibration value (300 ADC/mm) used by the particle gain calibration.

Contact: Loic Quertenmont loic.quertenmont@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch
Presented for approval on June 23th, 2010 at general Meeting.

More details on the used technique are discribed in: CMS AN-2009/020, CMS AN-2010/020, CMS PAS TRK-10-001 as well as on the dEdx twiki page

Only collision events have been used: BPTX(TT0), BSC(TT41) and beam halo veto (! TT36||TT37||TT38||TT39)
A Good vertex must be present in the event
High Purity Tracks with |d0|<0.25cm and |dZ|<0.5cm and 12 Single-Sides Strip Hits have been used. SiStrip Cluster charge has been calibrated using gain with particles.

Harmonic-2 Estimator Truncated-40 Estimator  
dEdx Harm2 dEdx.png
dEdx Tru40 dEdx.png
dE/dx Distribution for tracks with P>5.0GeV using the Pixel-Less Truncated-40 and Harmonic-2 estimators.
Data-Harmonic-2 Estimator MC-Harmonic-2 Estimator  
dEdx Data Harm2 dEdxVsP.png
dEdx MC Harm2 dEdxVsP.png
Distribution of dE/dx vs P using the Pixel-Less Harmonic-2 estimators. Kaon and Proton bands are well visible in both the Data and MC. The Deuteron band is supressed in the MC, because PYTHIA is not producing deuterons.
Data-Truncated-40 Estimator MC-Truncated-40 Estimator  
dEdx Data Tru40 dEdxVsP.png
dEdx MC Tru40 dEdxVsP.png
Distribution of dE/dx vs P using the Pixel-Less Truncated-40 estimators. Kaon and Proton bands are well visible in both the Data and MC. The Deuteron band is supressed in the MC, because PYTHIA is not producing deuterons.
Harmonic-2 Estimator Truncated-40 Estimator  
dEdx Harm2 Mass.png
dEdx Tru40 Mass.png
Distribution of the reconstructed mass using momentum and dE/dx information of the tracks with P5.0MeV/cm using the Pixel-Less Truncated-40 and Harmonic-2 estimators. Difference between Data and MC for the Deuteron peak is due to the non-generation of Deuteron particles by PYTHIA.
Data-Asymmetric Smirnov Discriminator MC-Asymmetric Smirnov Discriminator  
dEdx Data ASmi dEdxVsP.png
dEdx MC ASmi dEdxVsP.png
Distribution of dE/dx vs P using the Pixel-Less Asymmetric Smirnov discriminator. Kaon and Proton bands are well visible in both the Data and MC. The Deuteron band is supressed in the MC, because PYTHIA is not producing deuterons.
Data-Asymmetric Smirnov Discriminator MC-Asymmetric Smirnov Discriminator  
dEdx Data Template.png
dEdx MC Template.png
dE/dx Template used by the discriminators to assign a probability that an observed cluster is compatible with a Minimum Ionizing Particle (MIP). What is shown is the probability that a MIP of a given pathlength (X-axis) would have release less charge than what was observed (Y-Axis). Tracks of at least 5.0GeV and more than 5 Single-Sided SiStrip Hits have been used to compute this dE/dx Templates. Note: This plot is relatively technical and should then be shown by expert only.

Contact: Carlotta Favaro, Hella Snoek
Presented for approval on 9 February 2011. A general description of the result can be found here. A detailed summary of the analysis is given in this presentation for the Tracker DPG meeting.

BPIXresolution.png
Transverse and longitudinal hit resolution as a function of the cluster length (png)

Individual plots are pasted below. Find more informations and names of contact persons in the following approval talks: Results for ICHEP 2010 are here: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=81387

Results for kinks and bows are here: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=99220 (with plots in pdf format currently at https://frmeier.web.cern.ch/frmeier/alignment/)

Results for updated FPIX DMR, Tracker tilts, PV validation in 2010 are here https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=123710

* TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 1 - Cosmic track Chi2 probability:
ProbChi2.png

* TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 2 - TIB local residuals:
LocalResiduals_TIB.png

* TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 3 - TOB local residuals:
LocalResiduals_TOB.png

* TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 4 - Sagitta for 3 BPIX ladders:
SagittaBPIX.png

  • TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - example of Chi2 scan as a function of Theta_{X}:
    sumtxm0.png

  • TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - example of Chi2 scan as a function of Theta_{Y}:
    sumtym0.png

  • TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - Results of Tracker Tilt alignment on 2010 data:
    tiltband.png

  • TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - Results of Tracker Tilt alignment on MC: tiltbandmc.eps
    tiltbandmc.png

  • TK alignment - PV validaiton 2010 - DeltaZ separation of BPIX half shells vs time in 2010 (measured with PV residuals):
    DzVsTime_forApproval-v2.png

Results on PV validation, Z mass validation and kinks and bows were approved at the Run Organization Meeting on August 16, 2011, slides with little more explanation are attached to the agenda of the following CMS General Meeting. Individual plots are listed below.

Contact: Roberto Castello (roberto.castello@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch), Gero Flucke (gero.flucke@desyNOSPAMPLEASE.de)
Presented for approval on May 2nd, 2012 at Weekly General Meeting. Explanation of the plots is contained in the linked slides.

Control of weak modes and global deformations
weakmodestudy TwistAligned vs Summer2011.png
pdf
chi2ndf Twist.png
pdf
Twist deformation

weakmodestudy SkewAligned vs Summer2011.png
pdf
chi2ndf Skew.png
pdf
Skew deformation

weakmodestudy SagittaAligned vs Summer2011.png
pdf
chi2ndf XSagitta.png
pdf
Sagitta deformation

Tracker Surface deformations
ResXvsXProfile TIB.png
pdf
ResXvsYProfile TIB.png
pdf
Surface deformations in TIB
ResXvsXProfile TOB.png
pdf
ResXvsYProfile TOB.png
pdf
Surface deformations and kinks in TOB
ResXvsXProfile TEC R5-7.png
pdf
ResXvsYProfile TEC R5-7.png
pdf
Surface deformations and kinks in TEC
ResXvsYProfile BPIX.png
pdf
Surface deformations in the BPIX
probchi2 d0.png
pdf
Chi2 probabilty vs d0

Alignment precision in Pixel detector
DmedianR TPB.png
pdf
DmedianYR TPB.png
pdf
DMR for Barrel pixels ( Data/MC design/MC misalignment)
DmedianR TPE.png
pdf
DmedianYR TPE.png
pdf
DMR for Forward pixels ( Data/MC design/MC misalignment)

Contact: Janos Karancsi, Janos.Karancsi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch and Viktor Veszpremi, Viktor.Veszpremi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval on May 13, 2011

Definition of efficiency: N_valid + N_missing_with_cluster / (N_valid + N_missing), for Rechits with no other Rechits within 5 mm. N_missing_with_cluster : Missing RecHits with a cluster within 500 um.

Event selection: ≥1 vertex, where |z|4. track selection: General track seeded from the Pixels, valid hits always required on "other" layers in order to minimize bias from seeding. Track p_T>0.6 GeV, N_strip_hits >10, track consistent with vertex (cut on impact parameters d0, dz - layer dependent), track separation (RecHits separated by 5mm)

Efficiency vs Layers and Disks - first 2011 runs:

det 11data.png
Efficiency vs layers and disks - systematic error: 0.002, statistical error: of order 10^-5

High Voltage Bias Scan - 2011 March:

BmO Sector6 Layer1 HV1 BpO Sector2 Layer3 HV1 BmI Disk1 ROG1 HV1
hv11 l1.png
Dependence of efficiency on the applied bias voltage in the BPix HV group 1 BmO Sector6 Layer1
hv11 l3.png
Dependence of efficiency on the applied bias voltage in the BPix HV group 1 BpO Sector2 Layer3
hv11 d1.png
Dependence of efficiency on the applied bias voltage in the FPix HV group 1 BmI Disk1 Blade 1-3


Plots approved mainly for expert presentations:


2010 runs:

The initial average number of protons per bunch and the number of bunches per orbit (colliding at CMS) are shown in green. The observed efficiency loss is qualitatively understood, but not verified quantitatively. It is not due to detector degradation. Some dynamic efficiency loss is expected due to high occupancy because readout buffers can become full which may cause losses of data. The innermost layer, Layer 1, is the most susceptible to this effect Efficiency on FPix stays within the systematics uncertainty of 0.002

Barrel Pixel Forward Pixel
date bpix.png
Efficiency for each barrel layer vs dates of the largest 2010 runs (time scale is not linear)
date fpix.png
Efficiency for each disks vs dates of the largest 2010 runs (time scale is not linear)
2010 Read out chip efficiency:

Integrated over all 2010 runs. Modules used in track seeding are excluded (eg Disk1 Panel1 Plaquette 2). X axis goes along global z, Y axis along -phi.

Hatched areas: inactive modules, White areas: no tracks or otherwise excluded from efficiency calculation

Statistical error - BPix: between 6.10-5 and 0.001, FPix: between 9.10-5 and 0.007. Systematic uncertainty: 0.002

Barrel Pixel
roc10 l1.png
Readout chip efficiency - Layer1
roc10 l2.png
Readout chip efficiency - Layer2
roc10 l3.png
Readout chip efficiency - Layer3
Forward pixel
roc10 fpixI.png
Readout chip efficiency - Inner FPix (+X side)
roc10 fpixO.png
Readout chip efficiency - Inner FPix (-X side)
 

Contact: Janos Karancsi, Janos.Karancsi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch and Viktor Veszpremi, Viktor.Veszpremi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval on May 13, 2011

Average cluster size (black) and efficiency (red) versus the relative phase between the LHC clock and the pixel clock.

The average cluster size is calculated using clusters attached to tracks with charge (uncorrected for incidence angle) greater than 12k electron. The the clock phase delay of the pixel clock is chosen to be 13 ns. This operating point is well within the maximum efficiency plateau.

delay11 det.png
Average on-track cluster size and sensor efficiency in the pixel detector at various delays of the pixel clock (delays w.r.t the LHC clock)

Barrel Pixel Forward Pixel
delay11 bpix.png
Average on-track cluster size and sensor efficiency in the pixel detector at various delays of the pixel clock (delays w.r.t the LHC clock) - Barrel Pixel
delay11 fpix.png
Average on-track cluster size and sensor efficiency in the pixel detector at various delays of the pixel clock (delays w.r.t the LHC clock) - Forward Pixel
Layer by layer plots of the fine timing scan around the optimal point.

Barrel Pixel
delay l1.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Layer 1
delay l2.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Layer 2
delay l3.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Layer 3
 
Forward pixel
delay dm2.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Disk -2
delay dm1.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Disk -1
delay dp1.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Disk -1
delay dp2.png
Zoomed in around optimal point - Disk -2

Contact: Maxime Gouzevitch, Maxime.Gouzevitch@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch and Giacomo Sguazzoni, Giacomo.Sguazzoni@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch.

Presented for approval on 10 June 2011.

Slides with explanations here and raw plots below.

  • 2T vs. 3.8T difference vs. z in the fitted Beam Pipe center position x and y:
    20110610_BPStudies_2Tminus4TCenterPosition.png

  • Nuclear interactions xy map in the beam pipe region ofr -20cm<z<20cm:
    20110610_BPStudies_XyMap.png

Presented on 11- June-2011 at General Meeting

Approval110610.pdf
Approved plots

Presented on 21- June-2011 at Run Coordination meeting: were they finally approved ?

TK iLeak Approval.pdf
Approved (?) plots

Presented on 11- June -2011 at Tracker DPG meeting

Plots of Hit efficiency for 2011; Tracker mao with hybrid and sensor temperature; SS2 leak rate evolution

DPG110610-temp-efficiency-2011.pdf
Approved (?) plots

Publications

  • All Papers
  • Detector performance before installation at P5:
    • Stand-alone Cosmic Muon Reconstruction Before Installation of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker link
    • Performance studies of the CMS Strip Tracker before installation link
    • Alignment of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker during stand-alone Commissioning link
  • Detector performance with cosmics:
    • Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker with Cosmic Ray Muons link
    • Commissioning and Performance of the CMS Pixel Tracker with Cosmic Ray Muons link
    • Alignment of the CMS Silicon Tracker during Commissioning with Cosmic Rays link
  • Tracking and Vertexing Results from First Collisions
  • Studies of Tracker Material

Older Results

2009

  • Pixel: 98.4% of channels in operation
    • Barrel: 99% (11400 out of 11520 ROCs operational)
    • Endcap: 96.9% (4185 out of 4320 ROCs)
  • SST: 97.2% of channels in operation
    • TIB/TID: 92.9 %
      • Two cooling loops closed due to leaks, ~2%
      • One ring lost (short, appeared with B field), ~1%
      • HV missing and HV shorts, ~2.5%
    • TOB: 98.3 %
      • One ring lost (short, comes/goes with B field)
    • TEC: 99.0 %
      • One HV PG missing (short)
      • One LV PG missing (short)

Total cluster charge, corrected for track impact angle w.r.t. the sensor
Cluster charge norm bpix 900.png
Barrel
Cluster charge norm fpix 900.png
Endcap

Pixel charge
Cluster pixChargeBPix.png
Barrel (eps)
Cluster pixChargeFPix.png
Endcap (eps)
Cluster charge
Cluster clusChargeBPix.png
Barrel (eps)
Cluster clusChargeFPix.png
Endcap (eps)
Cluster size versus clock phase
Cluster clusMeanSizeVsDelay.png
Barrel (eps)
 

Conditions TIB TID TOB TEC thin TEC thick
900 GeV, peak mode 27.4 26.7 34.1 28.8 35.7
2360 GeV, peak mode 27.4 26.8 34.1 28.8 35.7
2360 GeV, deco mode 20.3 19.2 23.9 20.3 26.1

Conditions TIB TID TOB TEC thin TEC thick
900 GeV, peak mode
snTIB900.png
TIB (eps)
snTID900.png
TID (eps)
snTOB900.png
TOB (eps)
snTECthin900.png
TEC thin (eps)
snTECthick900.png
TEC thick (eps)
2360 GeV, peak mode
snTIB2360.png
TIB (eps)
snTID2360.png
TID (eps)
snTOB2360.png
TOB (eps)
snTECthin2360.png
TEC thin (eps)
snTECthick2360.png
TEC thick (eps)
2360 GeV, deco mode
SNtib deco.png
TIB (eps)
TIDsn deco.png
TID (eps)
TOBsn deco.png
TOB (eps)
TECthinsn deco.png
TEC thin (eps)
TECthicksn deco.png
TEC thick (eps)

Strip Tracker synchronization: Fine delay scan (TOB3 in Deconvolution)

  • For Peak mode, latency scan is enough, fine delay scan not needed
  • Fine delay scan needed for Deconvolution mode only
  • Impact on Peak mode operation: ~2.5% on S/N.
  • Procedure described in CMS Note 2008/007
  • Runs 123970-123978

  • SST Fine delay scan:
    FineDelay900GeV.png

Hit efficiency

  • Description of the method: Tracks are selected which pass through a specific, well-identified silicon strip tracker module. The sensor is considered "efficient" if a charge cluster is found anywhere on the module that was traversed. If no cluster was found, the hit is considered "inefficient."
  • Track selection: Only tracks with the "high purity" quality flag from the first iterative tracking step are used. Each track is additionally required to have at least 8 valid hits.
  • Dataset: Results are from runs 123970, 123977, 123985, 124009, 124020, 124022, 124023, 124024, 124027, 124030 from the dataset /MinimumBias/BeamCommissioning09-BSCNOBEAMHALO-PromptSkimCommissioning_v1/RAW-RECO which skims on events with technical trigger bit 40 or 41 (Beam coincidence) and applies a veto on trigger bits 36-39 (Beam halo events).

More details on here

dedx1.png
dE/dx
dedx2.png
dE/dx with fit superimposed
dedx3.png
Kaon and Proton mass peaks

2010

Note also that the pixel online group approved many plots for PIXEL2010. Slides are on indico: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=99220 http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=99218

Most of the approved material can also be found on afs (/afs/cern.ch/cms/performance/tracker/activities/results_2010/Approved/) but should not be considered without the accompanying material in the Detector Performance Note.

  • Pixel: 98.3% of channels in operation
    • Barrel: 98.9% (11400 out of 11520 ROCs operational)
    • Endcap: 96.8% (4185 out of 4320 ROCs)
  • SST: 98.1% of channels in operation
    • TIB/TID: 96.3 %
      • One ring lost (short, appeared with B field), ~1%
      • HV missing and HV shorts, ~2.5%
    • TOB: 98.8 %
      • One ring lost (short, comes/goes with B field)
    • TEC: 99.0 %
      • One HV PG missing (short)
      • One LV PG missing (short)

Presented for approval in run meeting on August 27 by Ben Kreis.

The thresholds represent absolute thresholds, determined in s-curve run 131247. If you use numbers, please quote the numbers provided in the plots 'with stats'.

Detector with stats without stats
BPIX png pdf png pdf
FPIX png pdf png pdf
combined BPIX andFPIX png pdf png pdf
overlayed BPIX and FPIX png pdf png pdf
Contact: Urs Langenegger urs.langenegger@psiNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Contact: Andreas Jaeger andreas.jarger@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval April 30th, 2010

Cluster charge for barrel and endcaps, compared to the MC prediction. This is an update of the results presented in the CRAFT08 paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/T03007 There is a good description of data by MC, both in barrel and endcaps.

normalized cluster chargeBarrel prelim.png
Pixel cluster charge in the barrel region
normalized cluster chargeEndcap prelim.png
Pixel cluster charge in the endcap region
Cluster size in barrel and endcaps. There is a good description of data by MC, both in barrel and endcaps. The difference in cluster size between barrel and endcap is solely due to geometric effects (crossing angle of tracks in the barrel). This is an update of the results presented in the CRAFT08 paper: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/5/03/T03007

sizeBarrel prelim.png
Pixel cluster size in the barrel region
sizeEndcap prelim.png
Pixel cluster size in the endcap region

Contact: Christophe Delaere, Thomas Speer, Laura Borrello christophe.delaere@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, thomas.speer@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch, Laura.borrello@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval April 30th, 2010

On track strip clusters Signal to Noise ratio S/N for each part of the strip tracker, operated in deconvolution mode (nominal conditions). These plots give the performances prior the final tuning of the sampling time. It will improve further for data following April 28th.

TIB TID TOB TEC thin TEC thick
19.4 18.5 22.5 19.4, 19.1 23.9, 23.4
TIB.png
TIB S/N
TID.png
TID S/N
TOB.png
TOB S/N
TEC thin.png
TEC+ thin S/N
TEC- thin.png
TEC- thin S/N
TEC thick.png
TEC+ thick S/N
TEC- thick.png
TEC- thick S/N

Contact: Viktor Veszpremi, Viktor.Veszpremi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval on June 22, 2010

Definition of efficiency: N_hits_found / N_hits_expected computed in the fiducial regions. Layer 1 eff. underestimated by ~1.5% due to tracks originating outside Layer 1 (secondaries)

Used 7 TeV collision data. Event selection: ≥1 vertex, where |z|4. Track selection: seeded from the Pixels, valid hits always required on „other” layers in order to minimize bias from seeding. Track p_T>0.9 GeV, N_strip_hits >10, track consistent with vertex, where |dz|<1.0 cm and |d0|<0.5 cm.

06222010 LayerEff.png
Sensor efficiency in each pixel layer

Effect of the applied HV bias on sensor efficiency. Efficiency curve expected to change in future due to aging and radiation effects. Current operating points are 150 V in BPix and 300 V in FPix (consistent with module testing).

06222010 HitEffVsHVBPix BpO SEC2 L3.png
Dependence of efficiency on the applied bias voltage in the BPix HV group BpO sector 2 Layer 3
06222010 HitEffVsHVFPix BmI D1 ROG1.png
Dependence of efficiency on the applied bias voltage in FPix BmI disk 1 port cards 1-3 (HV1)

Contact: Viktor Veszpremi, Viktor.Veszpremi@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval on June 22, 2010

Average cluster size (black) and efficiency (red) versus the relative phase between the LHC clock and the pixel clock. During data taking the clock+trigger signal sent to the pixels was delayed in 2 ns steps.

The efficiency is calculated as above, but tracks are seeded from the strip tracker instead, and no valid hits are required (explicitly) on the other layers.

The average cluster size is calculated using all clusters with charge (uncorrected for incidence angle) greater than 12k electron. The advantage of this quantity is that it is totally independent of the tracking. The the clock phase delay of the pixel clock is chosen to be 10 ns in order to maximize the size of the clusters read out by the pixel detectors. This operating point is also well within the maximum efficiency plateau.

06222010 hitEffAndClusSizeVsDelay.png
Average cluster size and sensor efficiency in the pixel detector at various delays of the pixel clock (delays w.r.t the LHC clock)


Plots approved mainly for expert presentations:


Pixel efficiency per layer. In FPix Disk 1, the maximum efficiency region has a negative slope due to misalignment of the clock phase among the read-out groups. An additive correction factor to the clock phase delay for each read-out group was derived such that after re-adjusting the clock+trigger delays, the average cluster size is maximized at a common clock phase delay (of ~10 ns) in BPix / FPix.

06222010 HitEffVsDelay All.png
Pixel efficiency per layer at various delays of the pixel clock
06222010 clusMeanSizeVsDelay.png
Average cluster size at various delays of the pixel clock. FPix: at late clock phase, the average is biased towards large clusters, because the small (1-2 pixel) clusters with large average charge per pixel are no longer read out due to the timewalk effect.
The largest relative difference in the clock phases among the read-out groups was found to be 8 ns in the FPix (the clock+trigger signal arrives to this part of the pixel detector the latest.) The first plot shows the efficiency vs clock delay curve of this (black) and two other read-out groups. The second plot shows the same curves after the clock+trigger delay adjustment is applied. Note that the second plot is merely a derivative of the first one. (In order to test a new detector configuration, one would need to perform another delay scan measurement.) The merit of the second plot is that it demonstrates how well the correction works that is derived from the average cluster size measurements.

06222010 HitEffVsDelay FPix part.png
Efficiency vs clock delay in three read-out groups in the FPix measured during the delay scan
06222010 HitEffVsDelay FPix part Corr.png
Efficiency vs clock delay after the internal alignment of the FPix.
The largest relative difference in the clock phases among the BPix read-out groups was found to be 3 ns (the clock+trigger signal arrives to this part of BPix the earliest.) The first (second) plot shows the efficiency vs clock delay curve of this and two, well-aligned groups before (after) the internal alignment of the BPix.

06222010 HitEffVsDelay BPix part.png
Efficiency vs clock delay in three read-out groups in the BPix measured during the delay scan
06222010 HitEffVsDelay BPix part Corr.png
Efficiency vs clock delay after the internal alignment of the BPix.

Contact: Christophe Delaere christophe.delaere@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch

Presented for approval on April 30th, 2010

The timing is measured independently for each partition. For endcaps, where thin and thick sensors are mixed, each type of sensor is considered separately. The dashed line represents the working point determined in December 2009, measuring the timing of the TOB partition only (see TRKApprovedResults900GeV). The optimal point is obtained by considering the maximum of the fitted pulse shape, using the analytical deconvoluted signal description.

From the plot on sees the good state of the initial timing. There is a 2ns effect between thin and thick sensors, just as expected from the difference of drift time in the bulk of the silicon. The differences from partition to partition are less than 2ns, which is compatible with the resolution of the initial cross-partition timing. The various partitions will be corrected on April 28th, so that data following the April technical stop should have all partitions and sensors better in sync.

Details of the procedure are presented in CMS Note 2008/007.

stripFineDelay.png
Strip delay scan

efficiency.png
Strip efficiency

Plots of the performance of the strip tracker during commissioning at +4°C can be found here

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsDelay_All.png r1 manage 16.7 K 2010-07-01 - 11:10 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsDelay_BPix_part.png r1 manage 14.8 K 2010-07-01 - 11:11 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsDelay_BPix_part_Corr.png r1 manage 14.7 K 2010-07-01 - 11:11 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsDelay_FPix_part.png r1 manage 15.2 K 2010-07-01 - 11:11 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsDelay_FPix_part_Corr.png r1 manage 15.1 K 2010-07-01 - 11:12 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsHVBPix_BpO_SEC2_L3.png r1 manage 12.2 K 2010-07-01 - 10:39 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_HitEffVsHVFPix_BmI_D1_ROG1.png r1 manage 12.1 K 2010-07-01 - 10:39 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_LayerEff.png r1 manage 13.8 K 2010-07-01 - 10:37 ViktorVeszpremi Sensor efficiency in each pixel layer measured in 7 TeV data
PNGpng 06222010_clusMeanSizeVsDelay.png r1 manage 13.9 K 2010-07-01 - 11:10 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 06222010_hitEffAndClusSizeVsDelay.png r1 manage 18.0 K 2010-07-01 - 11:12 ViktorVeszpremi  
PNGpng 20110610_BPStudies_2Tminus4TCenterPosition.png r1 manage 52.6 K 2011-06-18 - 00:38 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng 20110610_BPStudies_XyMap.png r1 manage 78.6 K 2011-06-18 - 00:38 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PDFpdf 20110615_BPStudies_PublicPlots.pdf r1 manage 319.3 K 2011-06-18 - 00:47 GiacomoSguazzoni  
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_PVvalidation.eps r1 manage 11.3 K 2011-09-14 - 15:04 GeroFlucke PV vertex delta z validation
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_PVvalidation.pdf r1 manage 11.2 K 2011-09-14 - 15:04 GeroFlucke PV vertex delta z validation
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_ZmassVsEtaPlus.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2012-05-22 - 11:48 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng 2011_alignment_ZmassVsEtaPlus.png r1 manage 13.2 K 2011-09-14 - 15:05 GeroFlucke Z mass vs eta
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_ZmassVsEtaPlus_newMarkers.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2012-05-22 - 11:48 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_ZmassVsPhiPlus.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2011-09-14 - 15:06 GeroFlucke Z mass vs phi
PNGpng 2011_alignment_ZmassVsPhiPlus.png r1 manage 14.4 K 2011-09-14 - 15:06 GeroFlucke Z mass vs phi
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_ZmassVsPhiPlus_newMarkers.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2012-05-22 - 11:44 RobertoCastello  
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_bowDalpha.eps r1 manage 8.9 K 2011-09-14 - 14:57 GeroFlucke kink between sensor of double sensor modules
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_bowDalpha.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2011-09-14 - 14:57 GeroFlucke kink between sensor of double sensor modules
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_bowW02_doubleSens.eps r1 manage 9.3 K 2011-09-14 - 14:59 GeroFlucke mean sensor bow along local y for double sensor modules
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_bowW02_doubleSens.pdf r1 manage 14.1 K 2011-09-14 - 14:59 GeroFlucke mean sensor bow along local y for double sensor modules
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_bowW02_singleSens.eps r1 manage 11.2 K 2011-09-14 - 15:00 GeroFlucke sensor bow along local y for single sensor modules
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_bowW02_singleSens.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2011-09-14 - 15:01 GeroFlucke sensor bow along local y for single sensor modules
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_bowW20_doubleSens.eps r1 manage 9.4 K 2011-09-14 - 15:02 GeroFlucke mean sensor bow along local x for double sensor modules
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_bowW20_doubleSens.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2011-09-14 - 15:02 GeroFlucke mean sensor bow along local x for double sensor modules
Unknown file formateps 2011_alignment_bowW20_singleSens.eps r1 manage 10.9 K 2011-09-14 - 15:03 GeroFlucke sensor bow along local x for single sensor modules
PDFpdf 2011_alignment_bowW20_singleSens.pdf r1 manage 15.0 K 2011-09-14 - 15:03 GeroFlucke sensor bow along local x for single sensor modules
PDFpdf 20120911_TRKDPG_Plots_Vertex2012.pdf r1 manage 1386.1 K 2012-09-21 - 15:41 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PDFpdf 2012_ICHEP_TrkDpg.pdf r1 manage 245.1 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng 900GeV2Tcluster.png r1 manage 166.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:07 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng 900GeV2Tfit.png r1 manage 129.0 K 2010-06-29 - 11:07 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng 900GeV38Tcluster.png r1 manage 159.1 K 2010-06-29 - 11:07 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng 900GeV38Tfit.png r1 manage 128.7 K 2010-06-29 - 11:07 ChristopheDelaere  
PDFpdf APS_Presentation_WillBurg.pdf r1 manage 932.8 K 2012-11-12 - 12:04 PetraMerkel  
PDFpdf Approval110610.pdf r1 manage 750.1 K 2011-07-06 - 15:09 LinoDemaria Plots approved 11-june-2011: signal time profile; readout synch; Map of S/N; new dE/dx plots
Unknown file formateps BPIXresolution.eps r1 manage 8.6 K 2011-02-10 - 10:49 CarlottaFavaro  
PNGpng BPIXresolution.png r1 manage 17.2 K 2011-02-10 - 10:48 CarlottaFavaro  
PNGpng ClusterChargeCentralvsLumi.png r1 manage 100.1 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterChargeForwardvsLumi.png r1 manage 96.1 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterChargeLandau.png r1 manage 158.5 K 2012-11-12 - 11:59 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSize.png r1 manage 83.3 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSizeCentralvsLumi.png r1 manage 94.1 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSizeForwardvsLumi.png r1 manage 95.5 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSizeX.png r1 manage 63.4 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSizeXYvsLumi.png r1 manage 314.1 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ClusterSizeY.png r1 manage 64.6 K 2012-11-12 - 12:02 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng Cluster_charge_norm_bpix_900.png r1 manage 80.6 K 2010-06-29 - 11:01 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_charge_norm_fpix_900.png r1 manage 77.3 K 2010-06-29 - 11:01 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_clusChargeBPix.png r1 manage 45.3 K 2010-06-29 - 11:05 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_clusChargeFPix.png r1 manage 47.0 K 2010-06-29 - 11:05 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_clusMeanSizeVsDelay.png r1 manage 25.3 K 2010-06-29 - 11:04 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_pixChargeBPix.png r1 manage 43.9 K 2010-06-29 - 11:05 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng Cluster_pixChargeFPix.png r1 manage 43.8 K 2010-06-29 - 11:05 ChristopheDelaere  
PDFpdf DPG110610-temp-efficiency-2011.pdf r1 manage 801.9 K 2011-07-06 - 15:30 LinoDemaria Plots approved at DPG: Temp Hybr/Sens; Leak rate; Hit Efficiency 2011
PDFpdf DmedianR_TPB.pdf r1 manage 12.0 K 2012-05-06 - 02:13 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng DmedianR_TPB.png r1 manage 159.2 K 2012-05-05 - 23:18 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf DmedianR_TPE.pdf r1 manage 11.4 K 2012-05-06 - 02:13 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng DmedianR_TPE.png r1 manage 152.1 K 2012-05-05 - 23:13 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf DmedianYR_TPB.pdf r1 manage 11.7 K 2012-05-06 - 02:12 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng DmedianYR_TPB.png r1 manage 156.7 K 2012-05-05 - 23:11 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf DmedianYR_TPE.pdf r1 manage 11.4 K 2012-05-06 - 02:11 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng DmedianYR_TPE.png r1 manage 153.0 K 2012-05-05 - 22:58 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng DzVsTime_forApproval-v2.png r1 manage 34.9 K 2011-07-26 - 15:08 AlessioBonato TK alignment - PV validaiton 2010 - DeltaZ separation of BPIX half shells vs time in 2010 (measured with PV residuals)
PNGpng FineDelay900GeV.png r1 manage 15.8 K 2010-06-29 - 11:15 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng HitEffSummaryQualcutOverlay_approval_900.png r1 manage 14.1 K 2010-06-29 - 11:15 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng LAS_scan.png r1 manage 77.2 K 2011-12-02 - 16:26 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng LocalResiduals_TIB.png r1 manage 1086.5 K 2011-07-26 - 14:56 AlessioBonato TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 2 - TIB local residuals
PNGpng LocalResiduals_TOB.png r1 manage 1125.9 K 2011-07-26 - 14:55 AlessioBonato TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 3 - TOB local residuals
PDFpdf MassVSPhiPlus_newMarkers.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2012-05-22 - 11:38 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng NumberOfSignals_AlignmentTubes.png r1 manage 11.0 K 2011-12-02 - 16:23 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng NumberOfSignals_AlignmentTubes_CMS.png r1 manage 18.7 K 2011-12-02 - 17:07 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng OptimalDelayVsSubdetectorLayer.png r1 manage 513.6 K 2012-09-21 - 15:41 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng PixelTripletResiduals_rphi.png r1 manage 117.2 K 2011-12-02 - 16:39 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng PixelTripletResiduals_z.png r1 manage 110.2 K 2011-12-02 - 16:39 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng ProbChi2.png r1 manage 1078.6 K 2011-07-26 - 14:54 AlessioBonato TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 1 - Cosmic track Chi2 prob
PDFpdf ResXvsXProfile_TEC_R5-7.pdf r1 manage 23.3 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsXProfile_TEC_R5-7.png r1 manage 25.8 K 2012-05-06 - 01:43 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsXProfile_TIB.pdf r1 manage 17.3 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsXProfile_TIB.png r1 manage 18.4 K 2012-05-06 - 01:43 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsXProfile_TOB.pdf r1 manage 20.2 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsXProfile_TOB.png r1 manage 24.0 K 2012-05-06 - 01:38 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsYProfile_BPIX.pdf r1 manage 16.5 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsYProfile_BPIX.png r1 manage 17.6 K 2012-05-06 - 01:37 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsYProfile_TEC_R5-7.pdf r1 manage 23.2 K 2012-05-06 - 02:08 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsYProfile_TEC_R5-7.png r1 manage 24.8 K 2012-05-06 - 01:36 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsYProfile_TIB.pdf r1 manage 17.3 K 2012-05-06 - 02:08 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsYProfile_TIB.png r1 manage 18.2 K 2012-05-06 - 01:36 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf ResXvsYProfile_TOB.pdf r1 manage 20.3 K 2012-05-06 - 02:08 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng ResXvsYProfile_TOB.png r1 manage 24.8 K 2012-05-06 - 01:35 RobertoCastello  
GIFgif Run166010_TIB_ClusterStoNCorr_Ontrack.gif r1 manage 8.1 K 2011-06-16 - 13:09 LauraBorrello  
GIFgif Run166010_TOB_ClusterStoNCorr_Ontrack.gif r1 manage 8.5 K 2011-06-16 - 13:13 LauraBorrello  
PNGpng Run_161473_LAS_Event.png r1 manage 22.6 K 2011-12-02 - 16:22 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng Run_161473_LAS_Event_T.png r1 manage 20.2 K 2011-12-02 - 16:22 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng Run_161473_LAS_Event_chi2.png r1 manage 14.6 K 2011-12-02 - 16:22 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng SNtib_deco.png r1 manage 13.4 K 2010-06-29 - 11:16 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_Data_Charge_Part.png r1 manage 16.7 K 2010-06-28 - 14:37 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_Data_Charge_Tick.png r1 manage 17.3 K 2010-06-28 - 14:38 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_Data_Gain.png r1 manage 14.5 K 2010-06-28 - 17:18 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_MC_Charge_Part.png r1 manage 17.8 K 2010-06-28 - 14:38 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_MC_Charge_Unca.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2010-06-28 - 14:38 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SSTCalibration_MC_Gain.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2010-06-28 - 17:18 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng SagittaBPIX.png r1 manage 979.9 K 2011-07-26 - 14:53 AlessioBonato TK alignment - KinksAndBows - Plot 4 - Sagitta for 3 BPIX ladders
Unknown file formateps StripHitRes.eps r1 manage 11.7 K 2010-11-18 - 16:09 ThomasSpeer  
GIFgif StripHitRes.gif r1 manage 13.1 K 2010-11-18 - 14:31 ThomasSpeer  
Unknown file formateps StripHitRes2.eps r1 manage 11.3 K 2010-11-18 - 16:09 ThomasSpeer  
GIFgif StripHitRes2.gif r1 manage 13.0 K 2010-11-18 - 14:30 ThomasSpeer  
PNGpng StripHitResTrackerMap.png r1 manage 282.0 K 2010-11-18 - 14:31 ThomasSpeer  
PNGpng SubdetectorSignalVsDelay.png r1 manage 105.7 K 2012-09-21 - 15:41 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng TEC-_thick.png r1 manage 14.1 K 2010-06-28 - 12:03 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TEC-_thin.png r1 manage 17.9 K 2010-06-28 - 12:03 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TEC_plus_Ring4_Beam0_profiles.png r1 manage 19.0 K 2011-12-02 - 16:20 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng TEC_thick.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2010-06-28 - 12:03 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TEC_thin.png r1 manage 14.0 K 2010-06-28 - 12:03 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TECthicksn_deco.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:16 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TECthinsn_deco.png r1 manage 15.0 K 2010-06-29 - 11:16 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TIB.png r1 manage 16.9 K 2010-06-28 - 12:03 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TID.png r1 manage 17.1 K 2010-06-28 - 12:04 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TIDsn_deco.png r1 manage 15.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:16 ChristopheDelaere  
PDFpdf TK_iLeak_Approval.pdf r1 manage 148.8 K 2011-07-06 - 15:15 LinoDemaria Strip Leakage current plots - RC meeting 21-june-2011
PNGpng TOB.png r1 manage 14.9 K 2010-06-28 - 12:04 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TOB_Beam0_profiles.png r1 manage 16.3 K 2011-12-02 - 16:19 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng TOBsn_deco.png r1 manage 13.6 K 2010-06-29 - 11:16 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng TrackerStatusMap.png r1 manage 734.7 K 2012-09-21 - 15:41 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PDFpdf Tracker_SubDetectors_l_vs_eta.pdf r1 manage 25.2 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PDFpdf Tracker_SubDetectors_x_vs_eta.pdf r1 manage 24.7 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng Vpsp.png r1 manage 7.4 K 2014-11-08 - 18:38 ErikButz  
PNGpng VpspNoLog.png r1 manage 7.9 K 2014-11-08 - 18:38 ErikButz  
PNGpng _400___sample_tick.png r1 manage 69.2 K 2014-11-08 - 18:46 ErikButz  
PDFpdf chi2ndf_Skew.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2012-05-06 - 02:10 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng chi2ndf_Skew.png r1 manage 144.0 K 2012-05-05 - 22:36 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf chi2ndf_Twist.pdf r1 manage 17.7 K 2012-05-06 - 02:10 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng chi2ndf_Twist.png r1 manage 144.0 K 2012-05-05 - 22:37 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf chi2ndf_XSagitta.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng chi2ndf_XSagitta.png r1 manage 143.6 K 2012-05-05 - 22:39 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf commissioningPerformance-2010.pdf r1 manage 139.6 K 2011-07-06 - 15:22 LinoDemaria Commissioning plots 2010
PNGpng dEdx_Data_ASmi_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 24.9 K 2010-06-28 - 15:18 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Data_Harm2_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 29.4 K 2010-06-28 - 15:04 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Data_Template.png r1 manage 14.2 K 2010-06-28 - 15:19 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Data_Tru40_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 28.9 K 2010-06-28 - 15:04 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Harm2_Mass.png r1 manage 14.4 K 2010-06-28 - 15:04 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Harm2_dEdx.png r1 manage 12.6 K 2010-06-28 - 15:04 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_MC_ASmi_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 22.8 K 2010-06-28 - 15:18 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_MC_Harm2_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 28.0 K 2010-06-28 - 15:05 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_MC_Template.png r1 manage 14.3 K 2010-06-28 - 15:18 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_MC_Tru40_dEdxVsP.png r1 manage 26.8 K 2010-06-28 - 15:05 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Tru40_Mass.png r1 manage 14.1 K 2010-06-28 - 15:05 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng dEdx_Tru40_dEdx.png r1 manage 12.5 K 2010-06-28 - 15:05 LoicQuertenmont  
PNGpng date_bpix.png r1 manage 27.2 K 2011-05-18 - 18:01 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng date_fpix.png r1 manage 27.3 K 2011-05-18 - 18:01 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng dedx1.png r1 manage 325.9 K 2010-06-29 - 11:23 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng dedx2.png r1 manage 357.6 K 2010-06-29 - 11:23 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng dedx3.png r1 manage 14.6 K 2010-06-29 - 11:23 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng delay11_bpix.png r1 manage 21.3 K 2011-05-18 - 17:52 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay11_det.png r1 manage 20.4 K 2011-05-18 - 17:52 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay11_fpix.png r1 manage 19.9 K 2011-05-18 - 17:53 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_dm1.png r1 manage 20.7 K 2011-05-18 - 17:53 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_dm2.png r1 manage 21.0 K 2011-05-18 - 17:59 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_dp1.png r1 manage 20.6 K 2011-05-18 - 17:59 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_dp2.png r1 manage 20.8 K 2011-05-18 - 17:59 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_l1.png r1 manage 22.4 K 2011-05-18 - 17:59 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_l2.png r1 manage 22.9 K 2011-05-18 - 18:00 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng delay_l3.png r1 manage 23.7 K 2011-05-18 - 18:00 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng det_11data.png r1 manage 18.4 K 2011-05-18 - 18:00 JanosKarancsi  
Unknown file formateps dmr_FPIX_x.eps r1 manage 8.8 K 2011-07-26 - 15:10 AlessioBonato TK alignment - DMR 2010 - DMR-u in FPIX after EoY2010 alignment
Unknown file formateps dmr_FPIX_y.eps r1 manage 9.3 K 2011-07-26 - 15:10 AlessioBonato TK alignment - DMR 2010 - DMR-v in FPIX after EoY2010 alignment
PNGpng efficiency.png r1 manage 20.8 K 2010-06-28 - 12:37 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng efficiencyMap_end2010.png r1 manage 68.5 K 2010-11-18 - 13:51 ThomasSpeer  
PNGpng efficiency_end2010.png r1 manage 19.0 K 2010-11-18 - 13:51 ThomasSpeer  
PNGpng hv11_d1.png r1 manage 16.0 K 2011-05-18 - 18:01 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng hv11_l1.png r1 manage 16.9 K 2011-05-18 - 18:02 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng hv11_l3.png r1 manage 17.0 K 2011-05-18 - 18:02 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng lorentz_angle_LAS.png r1 manage 6.5 K 2011-12-02 - 16:25 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng lorentz_angle_TOB_leg.png r1 manage 74.6 K 2011-12-02 - 16:24 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng normalized_cluster_chargeBarrel_prelim.png r1 manage 24.5 K 2010-06-28 - 11:58 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng normalized_cluster_chargeEndcap_prelim.png r1 manage 25.6 K 2010-06-28 - 11:58 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng pixel_barrel_z_resolution.png r1 manage 48.0 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng pixel_module_hit_eff_vs_layerdisk.png r1 manage 30.4 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PDFpdf probchi2_d0.pdf r1 manage 25.6 K 2012-05-06 - 02:09 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng probchi2_d0.png r1 manage 29.6 K 2012-05-06 - 02:04 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng roc10_fpixI.png r1 manage 28.1 K 2011-05-18 - 18:02 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng roc10_fpixO.png r1 manage 28.3 K 2011-05-18 - 18:02 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng roc10_l1.png r1 manage 16.6 K 2011-05-18 - 18:03 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng roc10_l2.png r1 manage 18.0 K 2011-05-18 - 18:03 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng roc10_l3.png r1 manage 18.9 K 2011-05-18 - 18:03 JanosKarancsi  
PNGpng sizeBarrel_prelim.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2010-06-28 - 11:58 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng sizeEndcap_prelim.png r1 manage 17.8 K 2010-06-28 - 11:58 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTECthick2360.png r1 manage 74.1 K 2010-06-29 - 11:13 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTECthick900.png r1 manage 68.7 K 2010-06-29 - 11:09 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTECthin2360.png r1 manage 63.0 K 2010-06-29 - 11:13 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTECthin900.png r1 manage 61.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:09 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTIB2360.png r1 manage 70.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:13 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTIB900.png r1 manage 71.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:10 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTID2360.png r1 manage 74.8 K 2010-06-29 - 11:13 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTID900.png r1 manage 73.8 K 2010-06-29 - 11:10 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTOB2360.png r1 manage 70.2 K 2010-06-29 - 11:13 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng snTOB900.png r1 manage 86.4 K 2010-06-29 - 11:09 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng stab_11_all.png r1 manage 39.1 K 2011-12-02 - 16:21 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng stab_11_projection_TECm.png r1 manage 10.1 K 2011-12-02 - 16:21 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng stab_11_projection_TECp.png r1 manage 10.1 K 2011-12-02 - 16:20 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng stab_11_projection_TIB.png r1 manage 22.5 K 2011-12-02 - 16:20 PetraMerkel  
PNGpng stripFineDelay.png r1 manage 18.3 K 2010-06-28 - 12:37 ChristopheDelaere  
PNGpng strip_module_hit_eff_vs_layerdisk.png r1 manage 61.1 K 2012-07-02 - 11:24 GiacomoSguazzoni  
PNGpng sumtxm0.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2011-07-26 - 15:04 AlessioBonato TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - example of Chi2 scan as a function of Theta_{X}
PNGpng sumtym0.png r1 manage 17.5 K 2011-07-26 - 15:05 AlessioBonato TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - example of Chi2 scan as a function of Theta_{Y}
PNGpng tiltband.png r1 manage 17.4 K 2011-07-26 - 15:06 AlessioBonato TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - Results of Tracker Tilt alignment on 2010 data
Unknown file formateps tiltbandmc.eps r1 manage 10.4 K 2011-07-26 - 15:06 AlessioBonato TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - Results of Tracker Tilt alignment on MC
PNGpng tiltbandmc.png r1 manage 16.6 K 2011-07-26 - 15:13 AlessioBonato TK alignment - Tracker Tilt - Results of Tracker Tilt alignment on MC
PDFpdf weakmodestudy_SagittaAligned_vs_Summer2011.pdf r1 manage 1036.9 K 2012-05-06 - 02:14 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng weakmodestudy_SagittaAligned_vs_Summer2011.png r1 manage 225.5 K 2012-05-05 - 22:30 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf weakmodestudy_SkewAligned_vs_Summer2011.pdf r1 manage 580.1 K 2012-05-06 - 02:14 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng weakmodestudy_SkewAligned_vs_Summer2011.png r1 manage 262.9 K 2012-05-05 - 22:31 RobertoCastello  
PDFpdf weakmodestudy_TwistAligned_vs_Summer2011.pdf r1 manage 869.9 K 2012-05-06 - 02:13 RobertoCastello  
PNGpng weakmodestudy_TwistAligned_vs_Summer2011.png r1 manage 216.6 K 2012-05-05 - 22:31 RobertoCastello  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r68 < r67 < r66 < r65 < r64 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r68 - 2019-09-10 - MarcoMusich
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback