This is a condensed description with plots for the analysis HIG12001
To improve the sensitivity of the search, selected diphoton events are subdivided into classes according to the output value of a diphoton BDT which is designed to have the following properties:
Five mutually exclusive event classes are defined, four defined by the diphoton BDT output, and a fifth class into which are put all events containing a pair of jets passing selection requirements which are designed to select Higgs bosons produced by the vector boson fusion process.
The background model is obtained by fitting polynomials to the observed diphoton mass distributions in each of the five event classes. A cross check analysis is performed using an alternative background model where the result is extracted from a fit to the output distribution of a BDT (masswindow BDT) which has two inputs: the diphoton BDT output, and the mass. The results of the cross check analysis are consistent with those obtained from the mass fit.
Image  File links  Description 

pdf png  Figure 1: Background model fit to the mgg distribution for the five event classes, together with a simulated signal (m_{H}=120 GeV). The magnitude of the simulated signal is what would be expected if its cross section were equal to the SM expectation. The sum of the event classes together with the sum of the five fits is also given. a) The best event class defined by diphoton BDT output value. 

pdf png  b) The 2nd best event class defined by diphoton BDT output value.  
pdf png  c) The 3rd best event class defined by diphoton BDT output value.  
pdf png  d) The 4th best event class defined by diphoton BDT output value.  
pdf png  e) The dijettagged event class.  
pdf png  f) The sum of the event classes together with the sum of the five fits.  
pdf png  Figure 2: Examples of fits to determine the fraction of events in BDT output bin 0. The value of the fraction of events is shown on the yaxis. a) For a Higgs hypothesis mass of 120 GeV where three sideband windows can be used on either side of the three excluded signal windows. 

pdf png  b) For a Higgs hypothesis mass of 110 GeV where only one sideband window can be used on the low side without using data below 100 GeV and hence five sideband windows are used above the three excluded signal windows.  
pdf png  Figure 3: Example fit of a double power law function to the data over the mass range 100 to 180 GeV, used in the (crosscheck) analysis to obtain the background normalization. The 2% signal window shown by the red vertical lines, centred on a Higgs mass of 120 GeV for this example, is excluded from the fit. The values of the three parameters from this fit are a = 4.27 + 0.05, b = 0.02 + 0.22 and c = 10.0 + 2.3. The chisquared is 158.3 for 156 degrees of freedom, correspond to a probability of 43%. The chisquared is calculated by binning the data as shown and integrating the fitted function over each bin.  
pdf png  Figure 4: Exclusion limit on the cross section of a SM Higgs boson decaying into two photons as a function of the boson mass relative to the SM cross section, where the theoretical uncertainties on the cross section have been included in the limit setting. The limit is calculated using the frequentist CLs method. The expected limit obtained in the earlier analysis of the same dataset is shown for comparison. On popular demand: the observed and expected limit at mH = 125 GeV are 2.87 and 1.20, respectively.  
pdf png  Figure 5: Observed local pvalues, for the combined event classes, and also for the dijettagged class and the combination of the other four classes.  
pdf png  Figure 6: The best fit signal strength, in terms of the standard model Higgs boson cross section, for the combined fit to the five classes (vertical line) and for the individual contributing classes (points) for the hypothesis of a SM Higgs boson mass of 125 GeV. The band corresponds to + 1sigma uncertainties on the overall value. The horizontal bars indicate +sigma uncertainties on the values for individual classes.  
pdf png  Figure 7: Exclusion limit on the cross section of a SM Higgs boson decaying into two photons as a function of the boson mass relative to the SM cross section, where the theoretical uncertainties on the cross section have been included in the limit setting. The limit is calculated using the modified frequentist CLs method and uses the mass sideband background model.  
pdf png  Figure 8: Observed local pvalues, obtained using the mass sideband background model, for the combined event classes, and also for the dijettagged class and the combination of the other four classes. 
Image  File links  Description 

pdf png  Analysis description as a flowchart. 
Image  File links  Description 

100180 90180 90180x5  Diphoton mass distribution for data (data points), and Monte Carlo simulation of SM processes which constitute the background to the search (histograms). A simulated signal for a Higgs boson with a mass of 120 GeV is shown by the red histogram. The shaded band represents the theoretical (kfactor) uncertainty on the the MC prediction. The plot is available in three versions. In two versions, covering different mass ranges, the magnitude of the signal is what would be expected if its cross section were equal to the SM expectation, and in the other it is SM x 5. 
Image  File links  Description 

pdf png  Fraction of Higgs boson vertices found within 10 mm of their true location, for a Monte Carlo signal sample (m_{H} = 120 GeV), as a function of the Higgs boson transverse momentum. The distribution of the number of interactions per bunch crossing (n_{PU}) in the Monte Carlo is adjusted to be the same as in the data by weighting the events.  
pdf png  Validation of the vertex selection BDT with Z→μμ events.  
pdf png  Validation of the vertex selection BDT with photon + jet events.  
pdf png  Validation with Z→μμ events of the BDT used to predict the perevent probability that the vertex selected is within 10mm of the true vertex. The BDT is trained to predict when the wrong vertex is chosen, so a BDT output value of 1 corresponds to a high probability of correct vertex.  
pdf png  Validation with γ+jet events of the BDT used to predict the perevent probability that the vertex selected is within 10mm of the true vertex. (Includes use of photon conversion tracks). The BDT is trained to predict when the wrong vertex is chosen, so a BDT output value of 1 corresponds to a high probability of correct vertex. In this validation the jet is used to determine which is the correct vertex, and the sample is split into events where the correct vertex was chosen (according to the jet), and those where the wrong vertex was chosen. Unfortunately, the jet points to the wrong vertex quite often (the brown line, from MC, shows the vertex probability BDT output value for these cases) so there are many events with a very good probability that the correct vertex was chosen (MVA=1) even in the sample of events where the jet indicates that the vertex chosen is wrong (curves in red). 
Image  File links  Description 

png pdf  Distribution of photon ID MVA output in data and MC simulation for the leading photon in preselected diphoton events with mgg >160 GeV. Photons in the ECAL barrel. The hatched area shows the systematic uncertainty assigned to the photon ID BDT output.  
png pdf  Distribution of photon ID MVA output in data and MC simulation for the leading photon in preselected diphoton events with mgg >160 GeV. Photons in the ECAL endcap. The hatched area shows the systematic uncertainty assigned to the photon ID BDT output. 
Image  File links  Description 

png pdf  The energy resolution in different regions of the detector is investigated by smearing the energies of electrons in MC simulated Z→ee and comparing the resulting Z mass distribution with what is found in data. For electrons with R9>0.94 in the central part of the barrel (η<1) and away from module boundaries, the required additional smearing is very small. This is illustrated in the plot.  
png pdf  Systematic uncertainties for the photon energy scale, for separate regions of detector and for photons with R9>0.94 and R9<0.94. 
Image  File links  Description 

png  BDT output distribution for Z→ee events in data and MC simulation, for all selected events (left), for events with both electrons in the ECAL barrel (second from left), for events with one electron in the barrel and one in the endcaps (third from left), and for events with both electrons in the endcaps (right). The bottom row of plots show the data/MC ratio.  
png pdf  Comparison of the diphoton BDT output for data and for MC simulation in the "control region" (mgg > 160 GeV; black) and in the signal region (100 < mgg < 160; red). The data is shown as points, and the MC simulation is shown as hatched boxes whose size indicates the uncertainty.  
png pdf  The effect of the systematic uncertainty assigned to the photon identification BDT output on the diphoton BDT output, for background MC simulation (100 < mgg < 180 GeV), and for data. The nominal BDT output is shown as a stacked histogram, and the variation due to the uncertainty is shown as a hatched band. This plot, and the one below, show only the systematic uncertainties which are common to both signal and background, there are additional significant uncertainties on the kfactors and background composition which are not shown here.  
png pdf  The effect of the systematic uncertainty assigned to the photon energy resolution BDT output on the diphoton BDT output, for background MC simulation (100 < mgg < 180 GeV), and for data. The nominal BDT output is shown as a stacked histogram, and the variation due to the uncertainty is shown as a hatched band. This plot, and the one above, show only the systematic uncertainties which are common to both signal and background, there are additional significant uncertainties on the kfactors and background composition which are not shown here. 
Image  File links  Description 

png  Diphoton BDT output distribution for events in a simulated Higgs boson signal (m_{H} = 120 GeV) where p_{T}(γγ)>40 GeV. The events are shown classified according to the eta/R9 event classes used in the earlier (HIG11033) analysis. The event class boundaries based on the diphoton BDT output are shown as vertical blue lines, and events in the blue shaded region are not used in the statistical treatment, limit setting etc. Note that not all of the events shown in the plot would have entered the HIG11033 event classes since the event selection used for that analysis was tighter than the preselection used for the multivariate analysis.  
png  Diphoton BDT output distribution for events in a simulated Higgs boson signal (m_{H} = 120 GeV) where p_{T}(γγ)<40 GeV. The events are shown classified according to the eta/R9 event classes used in the earlier (HIG11033) analysis. The event class boundaries based on the diphoton BDT output are shown as vertical blue lines, and events in the blue shaded region are not used in the statistical treatment, limit setting etc. Note that not all of the events shown in the plot would have entered the HIG11033 event classes since the event selection used for that analysis was tighter than the preselection used for the multivariate analysis.  
png  Diphoton BDT output distribution for events in data (100 < mgg < 180 GeV). Both photons in the events have additionally been required to pass the HIG11033 selection requirements ("CiC supertight"). The events are shown classified according to the eta/R9 event classes used in the earlier (HIG11033) analysis. The event class boundaries based on the diphoton BDT output are shown as vertical blue lines, and events in the blue shaded region are not used in the statistical treatment, limit setting etc. 
Image  File links  Description 

pdf png  Event class 0: best event class defined by diphoton BDT output  
pdf png  Event class 1: 2nd best event class defined by diphoton BDT output  
pdf png  Event class 2: 3rd best event class defined by diphoton BDT output  
pdf png  Event class 3: 4th best event class defined by diphoton BDT output  
pdf png  Event class 4: Dijettagged event class  
pdf png  The five event classes combined. 
Image  File links  Description 

pdf png  Local pvalues for event classes shown individually.  
pdf png  Local pvalues. Also shown is the median expected pvalue for a Higgs boson with SM cross section at each mass hypothesis (blue dashed line), and the full local pvalue shape of the median expected pvalue for a Higgs boson with SM cross section at 125 GeV (red dashed line). 
Image  File links  Description 

png  Illustration of the definition of the signal region and sidebands for mass hypothesis m_{H}=120 GeV.  
png  Distribution of the first masswindow BDT input variable: the diphoton BDT output value, for data and MC simulationb in the signal widow for m_{H}=120 GeV.  
png  Distribution of the first masswindow BDT input variable: the diphoton BDT output value, for data and MC simualtion in the signal widow for m_{H}=120 GeV.  
pdf png  Distribution of the data, background model and signal model across the optimized bins of the masswindow BDT for m_{H}=124 GeV. 
I  Attachment  History  Action  Size  Date  Who  Comment 

Fit_BDT0_110.pdf  r1  manage  13.7 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
png  Fit_BDT0_110.png  r1  manage  23.7 K  20120301  13:53  ChrisSeez  
Fit_BDT0_120.pdf  r1  manage  13.7 K  20120301  13:53  ChrisSeez  
png  Fit_BDT0_120.png  r1  manage  23.2 K  20120301  13:53  ChrisSeez  
Hgg_vtxIdEfficiencyMVA_vs_bosonPt_Run2011.pdf  r1  manage  17.4 K  20120303  12:30  ChrisSeez  
png  Hgg_vtxIdEfficiencyMVA_vs_bosonPt_Run2011.png  r1  manage  107.4 K  20120303  12:30  ChrisSeez  
LimitSMRelFreqCompare.pdf  r1  manage  20.0 K  20120306  11:37  ChrisSeez  
png  LimitSMRelFreqCompare.png  r1  manage  43.0 K  20120306  11:37  ChrisSeez  
MVARes_log.pdf  r1  manage  17.4 K  20120303  12:31  ChrisSeez  
png  MVARes_log.png  r1  manage  57.1 K  20120303  12:31  ChrisSeez  
MVAValue_log.pdf  r1  manage  19.2 K  20120305  17:45  ChrisSeez  
png  MVAValue_log.png  r1  manage  62.9 K  20120305  17:46  ChrisSeez  
Table15.pdf  r1  manage  42.7 K  20120305  09:51  ChrisSeez  
png  Table15.png  r1  manage  43.4 K  20120305  09:51  ChrisSeez  
Zmumu_mva_Run2011B.pdf  r1  manage  18.5 K  20120303  12:31  ChrisSeez  
png  Zmumu_mva_Run2011B.png  r1  manage  51.9 K  20120303  12:31  ChrisSeez  
bdtcount_pvalues_split.pdf  r1  manage  28.5 K  20120301  13:50  ChrisSeez  
png  bdtcount_pvalues_split.png  r1  manage  43.2 K  20120301  13:50  ChrisSeez  
png  bdtout.png  r1  manage  54.8 K  20120304  08:47  ChrisSeez  
png  bdtoutput_dataMC.png  r1  manage  16.4 K  20120304  10:13  ChrisSeez  
png  categories_highPt_MC.png  r1  manage  16.6 K  20120303  15:03  ChrisSeez  
png  categories_lowPt_MC.png  r1  manage  18.1 K  20120303  15:03  ChrisSeez  
png  categories_passCiC.png  r1  manage  18.4 K  20120304  08:38  ChrisSeez  
compat.pdf  r1  manage  13.2 K  20120301  13:50  ChrisSeez  
png  compat.png  r1  manage  34.4 K  20120301  13:50  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycat0.pdf  r1  manage  33.3 K  20120301  13:50  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycat0.png  r1  manage  45.1 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycat1.pdf  r1  manage  34.6 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycat1.png  r1  manage  46.5 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycat2.pdf  r1  manage  34.4 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycat2.png  r1  manage  44.1 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycat3.pdf  r1  manage  34.9 K  20120301  13:51  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycat3.png  r1  manage  43.1 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycat4.pdf  r1  manage  32.2 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycat4.png  r1  manage  40.6 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
databkgoverlaycombcat.pdf  r1  manage  34.6 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
png  databkgoverlaycombcat.png  r1  manage  40.9 K  20120301  13:52  ChrisSeez  
png  deltaMOverMH_dataMC.png  r1  manage  14.1 K  20120304  10:13  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacat0.pdf  r1  manage  17.5 K  20120303  14:47  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacat0.png  r1  manage  39.9 K  20120303  14:48  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacat1.pdf  r1  manage  17.1 K  20120303  14:48  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacat1.png  r1  manage  37.0 K  20120303  14:48  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacat2.pdf  r1  manage  17.6 K  20120303  14:48  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacat2.png  r1  manage  39.7 K  20120303  14:48  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacat3.pdf  r1  manage  17.9 K  20120303  14:50  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacat3.png  r1  manage  39.5 K  20120303  14:49  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacat4.pdf  r1  manage  17.8 K  20120303  14:49  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacat4.png  r1  manage  39.7 K  20120303  14:49  ChrisSeez  
effsigmacombcat.pdf  r1  manage  17.3 K  20120303  14:49  ChrisSeez  
png  effsigmacombcat.png  r1  manage  38.3 K  20120303  14:49  ChrisSeez  
evt_mva_zmm.pdf  r1  manage  23.4 K  20120303  12:30  ChrisSeez  
png  evt_mva_zmm.png  r1  manage  14.2 K  20120303  12:30  ChrisSeez  
limit_sm_Frequentist_Ratio_Smooth.pdf  r1  manage  19.2 K  20120306  09:23  ChrisSeez  
png  limit_sm_Frequentist_Ratio_Smooth.png  r1  manage  40.6 K  20120306  09:23  ChrisSeez  
png  mass.png  r1  manage  36.6 K  20120304  10:13  ChrisSeez  
png  mass_sigx1_hash_100to180.png  r1  manage  31.6 K  20120302  16:14  ChrisSeez  
png  mass_sigx1_hash_90to180.png  r1  manage  29.8 K  20120302  16:14  ChrisSeez  
png  mass_sigx5_hash_90to180.png  r1  manage  30.0 K  20120302  17:00  ChrisSeez  
model_m124.pdf  r1  manage  14.3 K  20120304  10:14  ChrisSeez  
png  model_m124.png  r1  manage  21.2 K  20120304  10:14  ChrisSeez  
mvaFeb26.pdf  r1  manage  116.0 K  20120301  13:53  ChrisSeez  
png  mvaFeb26.png  r1  manage  149.9 K  20120301  13:53  ChrisSeez  
mvalog.pdf  r1  manage  38.5 K  20120304  08:47  ChrisSeez  
png  mvalog.png  r1  manage  41.8 K  20120304  08:48  ChrisSeez  
png  outabs_eta_R9_EB_GAPHistos9999_region_1_1.png  r1  manage  15.9 K  20120305  09:50  ChrisSeez  
phidmva1eb.pdf  r1  manage  44.3 K  20120304  08:48  ChrisSeez  
png  phidmva1eb.png  r1  manage  73.0 K  20120304  08:48  ChrisSeez  
phidmva1ee.pdf  r1  manage  38.9 K  20120304  08:48  ChrisSeez  
png  phidmva1ee.png  r1  manage  67.7 K  20120304  08:49  ChrisSeez  
phmvanomid.pdf  r1  manage  41.0 K  20120304  08:49  ChrisSeez  
png  phmvanomid.png  r1  manage  69.1 K  20120304  08:49  ChrisSeez  
phmvanomsige.pdf  r1  manage  35.7 K  20120304  08:50  ChrisSeez  
png  phmvanomsige.png  r1  manage  61.5 K  20120304  08:50  ChrisSeez  
plot_data_pow_model_120.pdf  r1  manage  30.8 K  20120301  13:54  ChrisSeez  
png  plot_data_pow_model_120.png  r1  manage  32.4 K  20120301  13:54  ChrisSeez  
pvaluesm.pdf  r1  manage  15.6 K  20120307  08:54  ChrisSeez  
png  pvaluesm.png  r1  manage  36.2 K  20120307  08:55  ChrisSeez  
pvaluesmcat.pdf  r1  manage  16.6 K  20120304  09:55  ChrisSeez  
png  pvaluesmcat.png  r1  manage  47.3 K  20120304  09:55  ChrisSeez  
pvaluesmcatc.pdf  r1  manage  15.3 K  20120301  13:54  ChrisSeez  
png  pvaluesmcatc.png  r1  manage  39.3 K  20120301  13:54  ChrisSeez  
sigmvanomid.pdf  r1  manage  34.8 K  20120304  08:50  ChrisSeez  
png  sigmvanomid.png  r1  manage  62.3 K  20120304  08:50  ChrisSeez  
sigmvanomsige.pdf  r1  manage  30.1 K  20120304  08:51  ChrisSeez  
png  sigmvanomsige.png  r1  manage  56.9 K  20120304  08:51  ChrisSeez 