Search for the Higgs Boson Decaying to W+W− in the Fully Leptonic Final State in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV
This is a condensed description with plots for the analysis
CMS-HIG-12-017
Abstract
We report a search for the Higgs boson decaying to W
+W
− in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8
TeV. The data were collected at the LHC with the CMS detector, and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 5.1 fb
−1. The W
+W
− candidates are selected in events with two opposite charged leptons and large missing transverse energy. Upper limits on the Higgs boson production relative to the standard model Higgs expectation are derived. The Standard Model Higgs boson is excluded for a mass in the range [129 - 520] GeV at 95% confidence level when these results are combined together with the analysis performed at sqrt(s)=7
TeV.
Main Results
A search has been made for a Higgs boson decaying in a pair of W bosons in the CMS detector.
Events are classified according the exclusive jet multiplicity: 0, 1 and 2. The analysis of events with 0, 1 jets
is optimized for gg → H → WW, while the one for events with 2 jets is optimized for Vector Boson Fusion
(VBF) qq → H → WW.
A cut and count analysis is performed, optimized for each mass point.
The main backgrounds (W
+W
-, top, Drell Yan, W+jets) are estimated
with data-driven techniques. The uncertainty on the background normalization represent the largest source of systematics of the analysis,
together with the theoretical uncertainties on the Higgs cross section.
The expected exclusion range at 95% CL when considering the results at 7 and 8
TeV, based on a MVA shape analysis and a cut based analysis
respectively is between 122 and 450
GeV for a Standard Model Higgs, while the observed one is
[129 - 520] GeV/c2 at 95% C.L. using the CL
s approach.
The observed (expected) upper limits are about 2.2 (1.2) times de SM expectation for a mass of 125
GeV
A small excess of events is observed for hypothetical low Higgs boson masses which makes the observed limits weaker than the expected ones.
Below we report the table with detailed exclusion limits for a range of masses 110-600 GeV/c
2,
for the cut based 8
TeV analysis and for the 7 and 8
TeV analysis combined, based on a MVA shape analysis and a cut based analysis respectively.
- results with the cut-based analysis:
|
|
8 TeV analysis |
|
|
|
7 TeV + 8 TeV analysis |
|
|
Higgs Mass |
Observed |
Median exp. |
68% band |
95% band |
Observed |
Median exp. |
68% band |
95% band |
110 |
8.9 |
5.4 |
[ 2.9, 3.9] |
[ 7.6, 10.1] |
6.1 |
3.9 |
[ 2.1, 2.8] |
[ 5.4, 7.3] |
115 |
4.4 |
2.9 |
[ 1.6, 2.1] |
[ 4.1, 5.5] |
3.6 |
2.0 |
[ 1.1, 1.4] |
[ 2.8, 3.7] |
120 |
3.2 |
1.8 |
[ 1.0, 1.3] |
[ 2.5, 3.3] |
2.2 |
1.2 |
[ 0.7, 0.9] |
[ 1.7, 2.2] |
125 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
[ 1.6, 2.2] |
1.4 |
0.8 |
[ 0.5, 0.6] |
[ 1.2, 1.6] |
130 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
[ 0.5, 0.6] |
[ 1.1, 1.6] |
0.9 |
0.6 |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
[ 0.8, 1.1] |
135 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
[ 0.3, 0.5] |
[ 0.9, 1.2] |
0.7 |
0.5 |
[ 0.2, 0.3] |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
140 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
[ 0.7, 0.9] |
0.6 |
0.3 |
[ 0.2, 0.2] |
[ 0.5, 0.7] |
150 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
[ 0.2, 0.2] |
[ 0.5, 0.7] |
0.5 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.2] |
[ 0.3, 0.5] |
160 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.1] |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
0.3 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.1] |
[ 0.2, 0.3] |
170 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.2] |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
0.3 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.1] |
[ 0.2, 0.3] |
180 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
[ 0.2, 0.2] |
[ 0.4, 0.6] |
0.3 |
0.2 |
[ 0.1, 0.2] |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
190 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
[ 0.2, 0.3] |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
0.4 |
0.3 |
[ 0.2, 0.2] |
[ 0.4, 0.6] |
200 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
[ 0.3, 0.4] |
[ 0.7, 1.0] |
0.5 |
0.4 |
[ 0.2, 0.3] |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
250 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
[ 1.5, 2.0] |
0.6 |
0.8 |
[ 0.4, 0.5] |
[ 1.1, 1.4] |
300 |
1.9 |
1.2 |
[ 0.6, 0.9] |
[ 1.6, 2.2] |
0.8 |
0.8 |
[ 0.4, 0.6] |
[ 1.1, 1.5] |
350 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
[ 0.6, 0.8] |
[ 1.5, 2.0] |
0.7 |
0.7 |
[ 0.4, 0.5] |
[ 1.0, 1.3] |
400 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
[ 0.7, 0.9] |
[ 1.7, 2.3] |
0.8 |
0.8 |
[ 0.4, 0.6] |
[ 1.1, 1.4] |
450 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
[ 0.8, 1.1] |
[ 2.1, 2.9] |
0.7 |
1.0 |
[ 0.5, 0.7] |
[ 1.4, 1.9] |
500 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
[ 1.1, 1.5] |
[ 2.9, 3.9] |
0.9 |
1.4 |
[ 0.7, 1.0] |
[ 1.9, 2.6] |
550 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
[ 1.5, 2.0] |
[ 3.8, 5.1] |
1.2 |
1.9 |
[ 1.0, 1.4] |
[ 2.6, 3.5] |
600 |
2.7 |
3.8 |
[ 2.0, 2.7] |
[ 5.3, 7.1] |
1.5 |
2.7 |
[ 1.4, 1.9] |
[ 3.7, 5.0] |
Paper figures
|
Δφ ll in the 0-jet bin at WW selection level |
|
Δφ ll in the 1-jet bin at WW selection level |
|
Exclusion limit with cut-based analysis at 8 TeV |
|
Exclusion limit with shape based analysis at 7 TeV and cut-based analysis at 8 TeV |
Paper tables
Yields at the WW selection level
Backgrounds are rescaled to the data-driven expectations
njets |
data |
all bkg. |
WW |
ttbar+tW |
W+jets |
0-jet |
1594 |
1501 ± 21 |
1046.1 ± 7.2 |
164.2 ± 5.4 |
158.2 ± 7.1 |
1-jet |
1186 |
1162 ± 27 |
381.0 ± 4.0 |
527.3 ± 8.4 |
122.6 ± 6.7 |
2-jet |
1295 |
1412 ± 24 |
177.0 ± 2.8 |
886.5 ± 11.1 |
94.9 ± 6.4 |
njets |
WZ/ZZ |
DY→ll |
Wγ |
0-jet |
32.6 ± 0.6 |
73 ± 27 |
27.1 ± 3.9 |
1-jet |
30.3 ± 0.6 |
77 ± 24 |
23.7 ± 5.2 |
2-jet |
20.8 ± 0.5 |
227 ± 20 |
5.6 ± 2.1 |
Yields at the Higgs selection level
- cut based approach in the 0-jet category, emu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
23.9 ± 5.2 |
87.6 ± 9.5 |
2.2 ± 0.2 |
9.3 ± 2.7 |
19.1 ± 7.2 |
6.0 ± 2.3 |
124.2 ± 12.4 |
158 |
130 |
35.3 ± 7.6 |
96.8 ± 10.5 |
2.5 ± 0.3 |
10.1 ± 2.8 |
20.7 ± 7.8 |
6.3 ± 2.4 |
136.3 ± 13.6 |
169 |
160 |
98.3 ± 21.2 |
53.6 ± 5.9 |
1.2 ± 0.1 |
6.3 ± 1.7 |
2.5 ± 1.3 |
0.2 ± 0.1 |
63.9 ± 6.3 |
79 |
400 |
16.6 ± 4.8 |
50.5 ± 5.8 |
1.5 ± 0.2 |
26.1 ± 5.7 |
4.5 ± 2.0 |
0.7 ± 0.5 |
83.3 ± 8.4 |
92 |
- cut based approach in the 0-jet category, ee/mumu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
14.9 ± 3.3 |
60.4 ± 6.7 |
37.7 ± 12.5 |
1.9 ± 0.5 |
10.8 ± 4.3 |
4.6 ± 2.5 |
115.5 ± 15.0 |
123 |
130 |
23.5 ± 5.1 |
67.4 ± 7.5 |
41.3 ± 15.9 |
2.3 ± 0.6 |
11.0 ± 4.3 |
4.8 ± 2.5 |
126.8 ± 18.3 |
134 |
160 |
86.0 ± 18.7 |
44.5 ± 4.9 |
11.3 ± 13.4 |
3.8 ± 0.9 |
1.3 ± 1.1 |
0.4 ± 0.3 |
61.4 ± 14.4 |
92 |
400 |
12.3 ± 3.6 |
37.1 ± 4.3 |
5.7 ± 1.3 |
20.0 ± 4.7 |
3.4 ± 1.9 |
13.6 ± 4.8 |
79.9 ± 8.3 |
55 |
- cut based approach in the 1-jet category, emu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
10.3 ± 3.0 |
19.5 ± 3.7 |
2.4 ± 0.3 |
22.3 ± 2.0 |
11.7 ± 4.6 |
5.9 ± 3.2 |
61.7 ± 7.0 |
54 |
130 |
15.7 ± 4.7 |
22.0 ± 4.1 |
2.6 ± 0.3 |
25.1 ± 2.2 |
12.8 ± 5.1 |
6.0 ± 3.2 |
68.5 ± 7.6 |
64 |
160 |
52.6 ± 14.9 |
20.1 ± 4.0 |
1.6 ± 0.2 |
21.5 ± 1.8 |
5.0 ± 2.3 |
0.9 ± 0.5 |
49.2 ± 5.0 |
62 |
400 |
11.4 ± 3.3 |
39.1 ± 6.3 |
2.1 ± 0.3 |
56.6 ± 3.7 |
7.1 ± 3.1 |
0.6 ± 0.6 |
105.5 ± 8.0 |
96 |
- cut based approach in the 1-jet category, ee/mumu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
4.4 ± 1.3 |
9.7 ± 1.9 |
8.7 ± 4.9 |
9.5 ± 1.1 |
3.9 ± 1.7 |
1.3 ± 1.2 |
33.1 ± 5.7 |
43 |
130 |
7.1 ± 2.2 |
11.2 ± 2.2 |
9.1 ± 5.4 |
10.7 ± 1.2 |
3.7 ± 1.7 |
1.3 ± 1.2 |
36.0 ± 6.3 |
53 |
160 |
37.9 ± 10.9 |
13.8 ± 2.8 |
28.4 ± 10.7 |
16.2 ± 1.6 |
3.8 ± 2.1 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
62.3 ± 11.4 |
65 |
400 |
7.4 ± 2.2 |
19.6 ± 3.2 |
7.9 ± 2.4 |
33.4 ± 2.4 |
1.6 ± 1.3 |
4.4 ± 1.8 |
66.8 ± 5.1 |
67 |
- cut based approach in the 2-jet category, emu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
1.5 ± 0.2 |
0.4 ± 0.1 |
0.1 ± 0.0 |
3.4 ± 1.9 |
0.3 ± 0.3 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
4.1 ± 1.9 |
6 |
130 |
2.5 ± 0.4 |
0.5 ± 0.2 |
0.1 ± 0.0 |
3.0 ± 1.8 |
0.3 ± 0.3 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
3.9 ± 1.9 |
6 |
160 |
9.9 ± 1.3 |
0.8 ± 0.2 |
0.1 ± 0.0 |
4.2 ± 2.2 |
0.6 ± 0.4 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
5.6 ± 2.2 |
11 |
400 |
2.3 ± 0.4 |
1.9 ± 0.8 |
0.2 ± 0.0 |
9.1 ± 2.7 |
0.5 ± 0.4 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
11.7 ± 2.9 |
22 |
- cut based approach in the 2-jet category, ee/mumu final state *:
mH |
H→WW |
pp→WW |
WZ+ZZ+Z/gamma* |
Top |
W+jets |
W&gamma* |
all bkg. |
data |
125 |
0.8 ± 0.1 |
0.3 ± 0.1 |
3.1 ± 1.8 |
2.0 ± 1.2 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
5.4 ± 2.2 |
7 |
130 |
1.3 ± 0.2 |
0.4 ± 0.2 |
3.8 ± 2.2 |
2.0 ± 1.2 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
6.2 ± 2.5 |
7 |
160 |
6.0 ± 0.8 |
0.7 ± 0.3 |
4.7 ± 2.7 |
2.4 ± 1.2 |
0.2 ± 0.4 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
8.0 ± 3.0 |
9 |
400 |
1.6 ± 0.2 |
1.5 ± 0.7 |
6.6 ± 2.8 |
4.9 ± 1.9 |
0.7 ± 0.7 |
0.0 ± 0.0 |
13.8 ± 3.5 |
15 |
Selections definition
WW selection
The following cuts constitute what in the paper is called
WW selection
Selection [units] |
ee,μμ |
eμ |
pTmax [GeV/c] |
20 |
20 |
pTmin [GeV/c] |
10 |
10 |
third lepton veto |
applied |
applied |
opposite-sign requirement |
applied |
applied |
mll [GeV/c2] |
12 |
12 |
projected MET [GeV] (**) |
45 (*) |
20 |
Z mass veto |
applied |
--- |
Δφ(ll-jetmax) [dg.] |
165 (*) |
--- |
top veto |
applied |
applied |
pTll [GeV/c] |
45 |
45 |
(*) For Higgs masses below 140
GeV in 0 and 1 jet categories no cut is applied in Δφ(ll-jet
max) and the projected MET cut in ee,μμ channel is set to 20 GeV.
Additionally a dedicated multivariate selection combining missing transverse momentum, kinematic and topological variables, is
used to reject Drell-Yan events and maximize the surviving signal yield. DYMVA variable has to be greater than 0.6 for 0 jet bin and above 0.3 for the 1 jet bin.
(**) For the VBF selection, Particle Flow MET is used.
Higgs selection
The following cuts constitute what in the paper is called
Higgs selection
mH |
pTmax |
pTmin |
mll |
Δφll |
mT |
[GeV/c2] |
[GeV/c] |
[GeV/c] |
[GeV/c2] |
dg. |
[GeV/c2] |
120 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
115 |
[80,120] |
130 |
25 |
10 |
45 |
90 |
[80,125] |
160 |
30 |
25 |
50 |
60 |
[90,160] |
200 |
40 |
25 |
90 |
100 |
[120,200] |
250 |
55 |
25 |
150 |
140 |
[120,250] |
300 |
70 |
25 |
200 |
175 |
[120,300] |
400 |
90 |
25 |
300 |
175 |
[120,400] |
Other figures
Kinematic variables at the WW selection level
|
dilepton invariant mass in the 0-jet bin at WW selection level |
|
dilepton invariant mass in the 0-jet bin at WW selection level |
|
|
leading lepton pT 0-jet / 1-jet / at WW selection level |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
trailing lepton pT 0-jet / 1-jet / at WW selection level |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
Fraction of 0-jet events as a function of jet pT threshold
|
Fraction of 0-jet events as a function of jet pT threshold measured in a sample of same-flavour lepton pairs consistent with Z decay, showing stability of jet selection in different pile-up conditions. A jet pT threshold of 30 GeV is used in the analysis |
Kinematic variables final selection
|
Δφ ll in the 0-jet bin one step before the final selection (no cuts on Δφ(ll) and m(ll)) for mh=125 GeV |
|
Δφ ll in the 1-jet bin one step before the final selection (no cuts on Δφ(ll) and m(ll)) for mh=125 GeV |
|
dilepton invariant mass in the 0-jet bin at final selection (all other selection applied) for mh=125 GeV |
|
dilepton invariant mass in the 1-jet bin at final selection (all other selection applied) for mh=125 GeV |
|
|
leading lepton pT the 0-jet / 1-jet / bins for mh=125 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
trailing lepton pT the 0-jet / 1-jet / bins for mh=125 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
dilepton invariant mass in the 0-jet and 1-jet bins for mh=160 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
Δφ ll in the 0-jet / 1 jet bins for mh=160 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
leading lepton pT the 0-jet / 1-jet / bins for mh=160 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
trailing lepton pT the 0-jet / 1-jet / bins for mh=160 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
|
|
transverse mass in the 0-jet bin for mh=125 GeV and mh=160 GeV at final selection (all other selection applied) |
pdf |
pdf |
[pdf] other formats |
Exclusion limits at low masses
|
Limits from 2012 at low masses |
|
Signal injection using prediction at 5.1/fb 8 TeV |