Measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV
This is a condensed description with plots for the analysis
CMSPASHIG13005.
Sensitivities and significances of the observed excess in the individual decay modes

Significance (m_{H} = 125.7 GeV) 
Combination 
Expected (prefit) 
Expected (postfit) 
Observed 
H→ZZ 
7.1 σ 
7.1 σ 
6.7 σ 
H→γγ 
4.2 σ 
3.9 σ 
3.2 σ 
H→WW 
5.6 σ 
5.3 σ 
3.9 σ 
H→bb 
2.1 σ 
2.2 σ 
2.0 σ 
H→ττ 
2.7 σ 
2.6 σ 
2.8 σ 
H→ττ and H→bb 
3.5 σ 
3.4 σ 
3.4 σ 
The expected significance is computed for the background + SM signal hypothesis (with μ=1).
The prefit expected significance is computed for the nominal value of the nuisance parameters,
while the postfit expected significance is computed setting the nuisance parameters to their
bestfit values.
Mass of the observed state
Plot 
Caption 

(Left) 1D test statistics q(m_{H}) scan vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} for the γγ and 4l final states separately and for their combination. In this combination, three independent signal strengths gg → H → γγ, VBF+VH → H → γγ, and H → ZZ → 4l are proﬁled together with all other nuisance parameters. (Right) 2D 68% CL contours for a hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} and signal strength σ/σ_{SM} for the γγ and 4l, and their combination. In this combination, the relative signal strengths are constrained by the expectations for the SM Higgs boson. 

1D test statistics q(m_{H}) scan vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} for the combination of the high resolution channels. 1Dscans of the test statistic q(m_{X}) versus hypothesized boson mass m_{X} for the combination of the γγ and 4l final states. The solid line is obtained with all nuisance parameters profiled and, hence, includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The dashed line is obtained with all nuisance parameters fixed to their bestfit values and, hence, includes only statistical uncertainties. The crossings with the thick (thin) horizontal lines define the 68% (95%) CL interval for the measured mass. 
Additional plots
Plot 
Caption 
\ 
1D test statistics –2 ln Q vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} for the diphoton final state. The solid line is obtained with all nuisance parameters profiled and, hence, includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The dashed line is obtained with all nuisance parameters fixed to their bestfit values and, hence, includes only statistical uncertainties. The crossings with the thick (thin) horizontal lines define the 68% (95%) CL interval for the measured mass. 
\ 
1D test statistics –2 ln Q vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} for the fourlepton final state. The solid line is obtained with all nuisance parameters profiled and, hence, includes both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The dashed line is obtained with all nuisance parameters fixed to their bestfit values and, hence, includes only statistical uncertainties. The crossings with the thick (thin) horizontal lines define the 68% (95%) CL interval for the measured mass. 

2D test statistics –2 ln Q vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} and signal strength σ/σ_{SM} for the combination of the high resolution channels. The cross indicates the bestfit values. The solid, dashed, and dotted contours show the 68%, 95%, and 99.7% CL ranges, respectively. In this combination, the relative signal strengths for the various final states are constrained by the expectations for the SM Higgs boson. 

2D test statistics –2 ln Q vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} and signal strength σ/σ_{SM} for the diphoton final state. The cross indicates the bestfit values. The solid, dashed, and dotted contours show the 68%, 95%, and 99.7% CL ranges, respectively. In this combination, the relative signal strengths for the various production modes are constrained by the expectations for the SM Higgs boson. 

2D test statistics –2 ln Q vs hypothesized Higgs boson mass m_{H} and signal strength σ/σ_{SM} for the fourlepton final state. The cross indicates the bestfit values. The solid, dashed, and dotted contours show the 68%, 95%, and 99.7% CL ranges, respectively. 
Compatibility of the observed state with the SM Higgs boson hypothesis: signal strengths
Plot 
Caption 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the combination (solid vertical line) and for contributing channels (points). The vertical band shows the overall μ̂ value 0.80 ± 0.14. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the combination (solid vertical line) and for subcombinations grouped by decay mode (points). The vertical band shows the overall μ̂ value 0.80 ± 0.14. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the combination (solid vertical line) and for subcombinations grouped by a signature enhancing specific production mechanisms (points). The vertical band shows the overall μ̂ value 0.80 ± 0.14. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. 

(Left plot) The 68% CL intervals for signal strength in the gluongluonfusionplusttH and in VBFplusVH production mechanisms: μ_{ggH,ttH} and μ _{VBF,VH}, respectively. The different colors show the results obtained by combining data from each of the five analayzed decay modes: γγ (green), WW (blue), ZZ(red), ττ (violet), bb (cyan). The crosses indicate the bestfit values. The diamond at (1,1) indicates the expected values for the SM Higgs boson. 
Additional plots not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the the individual channels. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The vertical dashed line indicates the prediction for a SM Higgs boson. 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the subcombinations by decay mode. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The vertical dashed line indicates the prediction for a SM Higgs boson. 

Values of μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} for the subcombinations grouped by a signature enhancing specific production mechanisms. The horizontal bars indicate the ±1σ uncertainties on the μ̂ values for individual channels; they include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The vertical dashed line indicates the prediction for a SM Higgs boson. 
Numeric values
The tables below contain the same information that is shown in figures 3a3c of the HIG13005 PAS.
Channel 
μ̂ = σ/σ_{SM} (m_{H} = 125.7 GeV) 
by production tag and decay mode 
value 
uncertainty 
H → bb (VH tag) 
1.306 
0.608 / +0.682 
H → bb (ttH tag) 
0.150 
2.903 / +2.820 
H → γγ (untagged) 
0.700 
0.289 / +0.326 
H → γγ (VBF tag) 
1.010 
0.535 / +0.628 
H → γγ (VH tag) 
0.571 
1.135 / +1.340 
H → WW (VBF tag) 
0.047 
0.555 / +0.747 
H → WW (0/1 jet) 
0.725 
0.197 / +0.220 
H → WW (VH tag) 
0.510 
0.942 / +1.256 
H → ττ (0/1 jet) 
0.770 
0.551 / +0.577 
H → ττ (VBF tag) 
1.423 
0.637 / +0.696 
H → ττ (VH tag) 
0.981 
1.496 / +1.680 
H → ZZ (0/1 jet) 
0.858 
0.258 / +0.321 
H → ZZ (2 jets) 
1.235 
0.583 / +0.852 
by decay mode 
value 
uncertainty 
H → bb 
1.148 
0.595 / +0.646 
H → ττ 
1.100 
0.397 / +0.432 
H → γγ 
0.772 
0.259 / +0.289 
H → WW 
0.679 
0.186 / +0.205 
H → ZZ 
0.919 
0.247 / +0.301 
by production tag 
value 
uncertainty 
Untagged 
0.779 
0.150 / +0.169 
VBF tag 
1.017 
0.312 / +0.357 
VH tag 
1.020 
0.468 / +0.503 
ttH tag 
0.150 
2.903 / +2.820 
Production modes
Likelihood scan results for a fit to the data assuming independent signal strengths for
each of the four production modes, while the decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM.
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(μ_{ggH}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for gluonfusion production μ_{ggH}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{VBF},μ_{VH},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VBF}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for vectorbosonfusion production μ_{VBF}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{ggH},μ_{VH},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VH}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for associated VH production μ_{VH}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{ggH},μ_{VBF},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 
Impact of theoretical uncertainties on inclusive production cross sections (not in PAS)
Likelihood scan results for a fit to the data assuming independent signal strengths for
each of the four production modes, while the decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM.
Results are shown with and without the theoretical uncertainties from higher order terms on inclusive production cross sections; acceptance, jetbin, PDF and underlyingevent uncertainties are always included.
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(μ_{ggH}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for gluonfusion production μ_{ggH}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{VBF},μ_{VH},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VBF}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for vectorbosonfusion production μ_{VBF}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{ggH},μ_{VH},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VH}) scan vs the signal strength modifier for associated VH production μ_{VH}, profiling the signal strength modifiers for the other production modes μ_{ggH},μ_{VBF},μ_{ttH} and all other nuisances. The decay branching fractions are assumed to be as in the SM. 
Ratio of production modes (not in PAS)
Likelihood scan results for a fit to the data of the ratio of signal strengths in associated VBF and VH production (μ_{VBF,VH}) and the other productions modes (μ_{ggH,ttH}). Using this ratio (μ_{VBF,VH}/μ_{ggH,ttH}) the branching fractions fractions cancel out in each decay channel and the results of the different channels can be combined.
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VBF,VH}/μ_{ggH,ttH}) scan vs the ratio of signal strength modifiers μ_{VBF,VH}/μ_{ggH,ttH}, profiling all other nuisances, for the different decay channels considered and their combination. The crosssection ratios σ_{VBF}/σ_{VH} and σ_{ggH}/σ_{ttH} assumed to be as in the SM. 

1D test statistics q(μ_{VBF,VH}/μ_{ggH,ttH}) scan vs the ratio of signal strength modifiers μ_{VBF,VH}/μ_{ggH,ttH}, profiling all other nuisances, for the combination of different decay channels as well as the SM expectation. The crosssection ratios σ_{VBF}/σ_{VH} and σ_{ggH}/σ_{ttH} assumed to be as in the SM. 
Tests for deviations of the couplings
Test of Fermion and Vector Boson Couplings
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(κ_{V}, κ_{F}) scan. 

2D test statistics q(κ_{V}, κ_{F}) scan, including individual channels. 
Additional plots not in PAS

1D test statistics q(κ_{V}) scan, profiling κ_{F}. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{F}) scan, profiling κ_{V}. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{V}) scan, if κ_{F} is fixed to the SM value (κ_{F}=1). 

1D test statistics q(κ_{F}) scan, if κ_{V} is fixed to the SM value (κ_{V}=1). 
Test of Custodial Symmetry
Using only untagged WW and ZZ events and assuming SM couplings to fermions
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(λ_{WZ}) scan vs the coupling modifier ratio λ_{WZ}, profiling the coupling modifier κ_{Z} and all other nuisances. The coupling to fermions is taken to be the SM one (κ_{F} = 1). 
Additional correlation plot not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(λ_{WZ}, κ_{Z}) scan, profiling κ_{F} and all other nuisances. The coupling to fermions is taken to be the SM one (κ_{F} = 1). 
Using all channels, and without assumption on the couplings to fermions (except their universality)
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(λ_{WZ}) scan vs the coupling modifier ratio λ_{WZ}, profiling the coupling modifiers κ_{Z} and κ_{F} and all other nuisances. 
Additional correlation plots not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(λ_{WZ}, κ_{Z}) scan, profiling the coupling modifier to fermions κ_{F} and all other nuisances. 

2D test statistics q(λ_{WZ}, κ_{F}) scan, profiling the coupling modifier to the Z boson κ_{Z} and all other nuisances. 
Test of Fermion Universality
Uptype vs Downtype Fermions
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(λ_{du}) scan vs the coupling modifier ratio λ_{du}, profiling the coupling modifiers κ_{u} and κ_{V} and all other nuisances. κ_{u} and κ_{V} are always taken to be positive. 
Additional correlation plots not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(λ_{du}, κ_{u}) scan, profiling the coupling modifier to vector bosons κ_{V} and all other nuisances. κ_{u} and κ_{V} are always taken to be positive. 

2D test statistics q(κ_{V}, κ_{u}) scan, profiling the modifier to the ratio of uptype and downtype couplings λ_{du} and all other nuisances. 
Leptons vs Quarks
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(λ_{lq}) scan vs the coupling modifier ratio λ_{lq}, profiling the coupling modifiers κ_{q} and κ_{V} and all other nuisances. κ_{q} and κ_{V} are always taken to be positive. 
Additional correlation plots not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(λ_{lq}, κ_{q}) scan, profiling the coupling modifier to vector bosons κ_{V} and all other nuisances. κ_{q} and κ_{V} are always taken to be positive. 

2D test statistics q(λ_{lq}, κ_{V}) scan, profiling the coupling modifier to the quarks κ_{q} and all other nuisances. κ_{q} and κ_{V} are always taken to be positive. 

2D test statistics q(κ_{V}, κ_{q}) scan, profiling the modifier to the ratio of lepton to quark couplings λ_{lq} and all other nuisances. 
Search for Beyond Standard Model Physics in Loops
Additional plots not in PAS
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(κ_{g}) scan, profiling the modifier to the effective coupling to photons κ_{γ}. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{γ}) scan, profiling the modifier to the effective coupling to gluons κ_{g}. 
Additional plots including Zγ (not in PAS)
For this fit, the Zγ analysis from
HIG13006 is included,
and an extra coupling modifier κ
_{Zγ} is added to the model to parametrize this loopinduced coupling.
Limits are set in the 2D plane (κ
_{γ}, κ
_{Zγ}), profiling the modifier to the gluon
effective coupling κ
_{g}, and assuming the treelevel couplings to be as in the SM (κ = 1).
Plot 
Caption 

2D test statistics q(κ_{g}, κ_{Zγ}) scan, profiling the modifier to the effective coupling to gluons κ_{g}. 
Search for Beyond Standard Model Physics in Loops and Decays
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(BR_{BSM}) scan, profiling the modifier to the effective coupling to photons and gluons κ_{γ}, κ_{g}. 

2D test statistics q(κ_{g}, BR_{BSM}) scan, profiling the modifier to the effective coupling to photons κ_{γ}. 
Generic search for deviations in the couplings (with effective photon and gluon couplings)
The search is performed with five independent coupling modifiers: κ
_{V}, κ
_{b}, κ
_{τ}, κ
_{t}, κ
_{g}, κ
_{γ}.
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(κ_{V}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{b}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{τ}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{t}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{γ}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{g}) scan, profiling the other five coupling modifiers. 
Generic search for deviations in the couplings (assuming SM loop structure) (not in PAS)
The search is performed with five independent coupling modifiers: κ
_{W}, κ
_{Z}, κ
_{b}, κ
_{τ}, κ
_{t}.
Plot 
Caption 

1D test statistics q(κ_{W}) scan, profiling the other four coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{Z}) scan, profiling the other four coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{b}) scan, profiling the other four coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{τ}) scan, profiling the other four coupling modifiers. 

1D test statistics q(κ_{t}) scan, profiling the other four coupling modifiers. 
Summary plots of couplings
Plot 
Caption 

Summary of the fits for deviations in the coupling for the LHC XS WG benchmark models (arXiv:1209.0040). For each model, the best fit values of the most interesting parameters are shown, with the corresponding 68% and 95% CL intervals, and the overall pvalue p_{SM} of the SM Higgs hypothesis is given. The list of parameters for each model and the numerical values of the intervals are provided in Table 3 of the PAS. 

Summary of the fits for deviations in the coupling for the generic sixparameter model including effective loop couplings. The best fit of the parameters are shown, with the corresponding 68% and 95% CL intervals, and the overall pvalue p_{SM} of the SM Higgs hypothesis is given. The result of the fit when extending the model to allow for beyondSM decays while restricting the effective coupling to vector bosons to not exceed unity (κ_{V} ≤ 1.0) is also shown. 

Summary of the fits for deviations in the coupling for the generic fiveparameter model not effective loop couplings. In this model, loopinduced couplings are assumed to follow the SM structure as in arXiv:1209.0040. The best fit values of the parameters are shown, with the corresponding 68% and 95% CL intervals, and the overall pvalue p_{SM} of the SM Higgs hypothesis is given. 

Summary of the fits for deviations in the coupling for the generic fiveparameter model not effective loop couplings, expressed as function of the particle mass. For the fermions, the values of the fitted yukawa couplings hff are shown, while for vector bosons the squareroot of the coupling for the hVV vertex divided by twice the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs boson field. Particle masses (in the MSbar scheme) and the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs boson are taken from the PDG. In this model, loopinduced couplings are assumed to follow the SM structure as in arXiv:1209.0040. 
Combined WW + ZZ results for spin 2
Plot 
Caption 

Postfit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg) in the best fit to the data. The observed value is indicated by the arrow and disfavours the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) signal hypothesis with a CLs value of 0.6%. 

Prefit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg). The median expected CLs value of the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) hypothesis for a SM Higgs boson is 0.2%. 
Additional plots for WW and ZZ alone
Plot 
Caption 

H→ZZ: postfit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg) in the best fit to the data. The observed value is indicated by the arrow and disfavours the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) signal hypothesis with a CLs value of 1.3%. 

H→ZZ: prefit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg). The median expected CLs value of the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) hypothesis for a SM Higgs boson is 6.8%. 

H→WW: postfit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg) in the best fit to the data. The observed value is indicated by the arrow and disfavours the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) signal hypothesis with a CLs value of 14.0% 

H→WW: prefit model distributions of the test statistic comparing the signal J^{P} hypotheses 0^{+} and 2^{+}_{m}(gg). The median expected CLs value of the 2^{+}_{m}(gg) hypothesis for a SM Higgs boson is 1.4%. 