Search for extended Higgs sectors in the $H \rightarrow hh$ and $A \rightarrow Zh$ channels in $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV $pp$ collisions with multileptons and photons final states (HIG-13-025)

Abstract

Using a 19.5 fb$^{-1}$ data sample at $\sqrt{s} = 8$TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC, a search for an extension of the Higgs sector to Two Higgs Doublet Models is presented. Decays $H \rightarrow hh$ and $A \rightarrow Zh$ of the heavy scalar and pseudo-scalar Higgs bosons, respectively, include the Standard Model-like Higgs h in the final state and lead to events with isolated leptons and photons.Observed multilepton events with or without diphoton candidates are organized into exclusive search channels based on event kinematics. The search channels are ordered by the amount of expected Standard Model background.Data-based estimation of the Standard Model backgrounds is emphasized, but data-validated simulations are also employed as appropriate. Observations are consistent with the Standard Model and lead to the exclusion of significant portions of Two Higgs Doublet Model parameter space presented in terms of the relevant parameters of the model.

Approved tables and plots (click on plot to get larger version)

Material in PAS

Figures

Figure Caption
Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_ALL_Approvalsuggestion_Dec032013.png Figure 1: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands for $H\rightarrow hh$ in terms of $\sigma * BR$. These limits are based on multilepton and diphoton channels. Branching ratios for $h$ are assumed to have Standard Model values. No contribution from gg$\rightarrow$A$\rightarrow$Zh is considered in this limit.
Exclusion_AtoZhiggs_Approvalsuggerstion_Dec032013.png Figure 2: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands for $A\rightarrow Zh$ in terms of $\sigma * BR$. These limits are based on multilepton and diphoton channels. Branching ratios for $h$ are assumed to have Standard Model values. No contribution from gg$\rightarrow$H$\rightarrow$hh is considered in this limit.
Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_Multilepton_Approvalsuggestion_Dec062013.png Figure 3: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands for $H\rightarrow hh$ in terms of $\sigma * BR$. These limits are based only on multilepton channels. Branching ratios for $h$ are assumed to have Standard Model values. No contribution from gg$\rightarrow$A$\rightarrow$Zh is considered in this limit.
Exclusion_AtoZHiggs_Multilepton_ApprovalSuggestion_Dec062013.png Figure 4: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands for $A\rightarrow Zh$ in terms of $\sigma * BR$. These limits are based only on multilepton channels. Branching ratios for $h$ are assumed to have Standard Model values. No contribution from gg$\rightarrow$H$\rightarrow$hh is considered in this limit.
Exclusion_T1_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png Figure 5: Observed and expected limits on Heavy higgs of mass 300 GeV in Type I 2HDM. The parameters $\alpha$ an $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ production, the branching ratio ${\rm Br}(H \to hh)$ and the branching ratios ${\rm Br}(h \to WW, ZZ, \tau \tau, \gamma \gamma)$. Region below the observed limit and within the observed limit loop is excluded.
Exclusion_T2_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png Figure 6: Observed and expected limits on Heavy higgs of mass 300 GeV in Type II 2HDMs. The parameters $\alpha$ an $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ production, the branching ratio ${\rm Br}(H \to hh)$ and the branching ratios ${\rm Br}(h \to WW, ZZ, \tau \tau, \gamma \gamma)$. Region below the observed limit and within the observed limit loop is excluded.
Exclusion_T1_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 7: Observed and expected limits on $A$ of mass 300 GeV in Type I 2HDMs .The parameters $\alpha$ an $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ production, the branching ratio ${\rm Br}(A \to Zh)$ and the branching ratios ${\rm Br}(h \to WW, ZZ, \tau \tau, \gamma \gamma)$. Region below the observed limit is excluded.
Exclusion_T2_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec040213.png Figure 8: Observed and expected limits on$A$ of mass 300 GeV in Type II 2HDMs. The parameters $\alpha$ an $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ production, the branching ratio ${\rm Br}(A \to Zh)$ and the branching ratios ${\rm Br}(h \to WW, ZZ, \tau \tau, \gamma \gamma)$. Region below the observed limit is excluded.
Exclusion_T1_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png Figure 9: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands on combined signal for Heavy Higgs and $A$ inType I 2HDMs ($m_{H}$ = $m_{A}$ = 300 GeV). The parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ and $A$ production, the branching ratio Br(H $\rightarrow$ hh) and Br(A $\rightarrow$ Zh) and the branching ratios Br(h $\rightarrow$ WW, ZZ, $\tau \tau$, $\gamma \gamma$).Region below the observed limit is excluded.
Exclusion_T2_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png Figure 10: Observed and expected limits with 1 and 2- $\sigma$ bands on combined signal for Heavy Higgs and $A$ inType II 2HDMs ($m_{H}$ = $m_{A}$ = 300 GeV). The parameters $\alpha$ an $\beta$ determine the cross section for $H$ and $A$ production, the branching ratio Br(H $\rightarrow$ hh) and Br(A $\rightarrow$ Zh) and the branching ratios Br(h $\rightarrow$ WW, ZZ, $\tau \tau$, $\gamma \gamma$). Region below the observed limit is excluded.
Tau2GG_MET0t030_RealFit_Dec062013.png Figure 11: Invariant mass distribution of photons in channel with up to two (i.e. one or two) hadronic taus and two photons, 0-30 GeV MET.
L1GG_MET30to50_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013png Figure 12: Invariant mass distribution of photons in channel with one lepton and two photons, 30-50 GeV MET bin. The blue fit is the one taken from the upto 2 tau+2photon channel and the red fit corresponds to an independent fit for this particular channel.
L2GG_offZ_MET0to30_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013.png Figure 13: Invariant mass distribution of photons in the channel with two leptons and two photons (0-30 GeV MET bin). The blue fit is the one taken from the (upto) 2tau + 2photon channel. The red line represents a fit excluding the zero bins and is for reference only, it is not used in the analysis.

L4DY1ZVTau0b0_MET.png Figure 14: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF1 off-Z + no hadronic Tau + no b-jet.Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY1ZVTau1b0_MET.png Figure 15: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF1 off-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2ZVTau0b0_MET.png Figure 16: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 off-Z + no hadronic Tau + no b-jet.Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2ZVTau0b1_MET.png Figure 17: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 off-Z + no hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY1Tau1b1_MET.png Figure 18: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF1 on-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet . Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2Tau0b1_MET.png Figure 19: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 on-Z + no hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2Tau0b0_MET.png Figure 20: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 on-Z + no hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY1Tau1b0_MET.png Figure 21: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF1 on-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.

Tables

Table Caption
Results_table_fourleptons.png Table 1: Observed yields for four lepton events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ data recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down by the number of and mass of any opposite-sign, same-flavor pairs (whether on or off Z), whether there are any b-jets present and the $E_{T}^{miss}$. Expected yields are the sum of simulation and data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_threeleptons.png Table 2: Observed yields for three lepton events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ data recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down by the number of and mass of any opposite-sign, same-flavor pairs (whether on or off Z), whether there are any b-jets present and the $E_{T}^{miss}$. Expected yields are the sum of simulation and data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_twoleptwogam.png Table 3: Observed yields for two lepton and two photon events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ data recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down the number of and mass of any opposite-sign, same-flavor pairs (whether on or off Z), and the $E_{T}^{miss}$. Only channels where invariant mass of photons lies in the higgs mass window (120-130 GeV) are considered. Expected yields are data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_oneleptwogam.png Table 4: Observed yields for one lepton and diphoton events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ data recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down in bins of $E_{T}^{miss}$. There are no hadronic taus in these channels. Only channels where invariant mass of photons lies in the higgs mass window (120-130 GeV) are considered. Expected yields are data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_twotautwogam.png Table 5: Observed yields for up to two hadronic taus plus diphoton events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ data recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down in bins of $E_{T}^{miss}$. Only channels where invariant mass of photons lies in the higgs mass window (120-130 GeV)are considered. Expected yields are data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_leptautwogam.png Table 6: Observed yields for one lepton, one hadronic tau plus diphoton events from 19.5 $fb^{-1}$ recorded in 2012. The channels are broken down in bins of $E_{T}^{miss}$. Only channels where invariant mass of photons lies in the higgs mass window (120-130 GeV)are considered. Expected yields are data-driven estimates of backgrounds in each channel. The channels are exclusive.
Results_table_systematic.png Table 7: The systematic uncertainties associated with this analysis.
finalstates_heavyhiggs.png Table 7: This table shows the various decay modes of $h$. The combination of these decays considered for the analysis are marked with ``$\checkmark$" and those not considered for the analysis are marked with a ``X"
finalstates_Azh.png Table 8: This table show the various decay modes of $h$ and Z boson. The combination of these decays considered for the analysis are marked with ``$\checkmark$" and those not considered for the analysis are marked with a ``X".
Hsearchchannels.png Table 9: Various combinations of decay modes of two SM-like higgs and how they populate the search channels.
Asearchchannels.png Table 10: Various combinations of decay modes of Z boson and SM-like higgs and how they populate the search channels.
Couplings_2HDM.png Table 11: Couplings of the neutral Higgs bosons to SM fermions and massive gauge bosons as a function of $\alpha$ and $\beta$. This table has be taken from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al.(http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4835). (Note: This is an erratum from the public PAS due to typos in this table in the PAS.)

Additional Material for HIG-13-025

Figure Caption
T1_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png Figure 1: $\sigma$*BR (H$\rightarrow$hh) contours for TYPE I 2HDM.Parameters $\alpha$ and $\tan\beta$ give Heavy higgs's couplings to SM fermions and massive gauge bosons. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png Figure 2: $\sigma$*BR (H$\rightarrow$hh) contours for TYPE II 2HDM. Parameters $\alpha$ and $\tan\beta$ give Heavy higgs's couplings to SM fermions and massive gauge bosons. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png Figure 3: $\sigma$*BR (A$\rightarrow$Zh) contours for TYPE I 2HDM. Parameters $\alpha$ and $\tan\beta$ give A particle's couplings to SM fermions and massive gauge bosons. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png Figure 4: $\sigma$*BR (A$\rightarrow$Zh) contours for TYPE II 2HDM. Parameters $\alpha$ and $\tan\beta$ give A particle's couplings to SM fermions and massive gauge bosons. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_hWW_BR.png Figure 5: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE I 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$WW.This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_hZZ_BR.png Figure 6: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE I 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$ZZ. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_htata_BR.png Figure 7: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE I 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow \tau\tau$. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_hgaga_BR.png Figure 8: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE I 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T1_hbb_BR.png Figure 9: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE I 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$bb. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_hWW_BR.png Figure 10: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE II 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$WW. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_hZZ_BR.png Figure 11: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE II 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$ZZ. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_htata_BR.png Figure 12: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE II 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow \tau\tau$. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_hgaga_BR.png Figure 13: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE II 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
T2_hbb_BR.png Figure 14: Ratio of SM-like higgs branching ratio in TYPE II 2HDM to SM higgs branching ratio for h$\rightarrow$bb. This figure is similar to one from theory paper by Nathaniel Craig et al. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2424), the only difference is plotting of $\tan\beta$, instead of $\beta$, on the vertical axis.
L3Tau1DY1ZVZL_MET.png Figure 15: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 below-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau1DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.png Figure 16: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 below-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau1DY0SS_MET.png Figure 17: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + no OSSF + 1 hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau1DY0SSJgt1b_MET.png Figure 18: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + no OSSF + no hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau0DY1ZVZL_MET.png Figure 19: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 below-Z + no hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau0DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.png Figure 20: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 below-Z + no hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2TwoZTau0b1_MET.png Figure 21: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 Two Z + no hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L4DY2TwoZTau0b0_MET.png Figure 22: Background breakdown vs MET for 4 lepton + OSSF2 TwoZ + no hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau1DY1_MET.png Figure 23: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 on-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + no b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
L3Tau1DY1Jgt1b_MET.png Figure 24: Background breakdown vs MET for 3 lepton + OSSF1 on-Z + 1 hadronic Tau + at least 1 b-jet. Here, background and signal are stacked.
SigmaBr_limit_table.png Figure 25: 95$\%$ C.L. upper limits on $\sigma * BR$ for $H\rightarrow hh$ and $A\rightarrow Zh$.

Additional Material from SUS-13-002 and SUS-13-003 (Links to Public Results)

Figure Caption
STElMu_ST_controlLOG.png Figure 1: The $S_\text{T}$ distribution in an opposite sign e$\textrm{$\mu$}$ $\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}$ control region. The uncertainties in the ratio plot below include both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 2: Distribution for H$_{\text{T}}$ in the opposite sign e$\textrm{$\mu$}$ dilepton $\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}$ control region.
TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 3: Distributions for E$^{miss}_{\text{T}}$ in the opposite sign e$\textrm{$\mu$}$ dilepton $\textrm{t}\bar{\textrm{t}}$ control region.
WZControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 5: Distributions for E$^{miss}_{\text{T}}$ in the WZ control region.
mass_dist_met0to50GeVL4onZMass_PFMETvsAllMass.png Figure 6: 4-lepton mass distribution for low-E$^{miss}_{\text{T}}$, low-H$_{\text{T}}$ ZZ control region.
fsr_mu3_invmass_19p5ifb.png Figure 7: 3-muon invariant mass showing asymmetric internal photon conversion.
EffRatvsRdxy_leptons_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 8: Efficiency ratio vs Rd$_{\textrm{xy}}$ ("b-ness of events") for muons and electrons.
FTvsFSB_DiLepton_highPt_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 9: f$_\textrm{t}$-f$_\textrm{sb}$ for taus with p$_{\textrm{T}}$ between 40 and 60 GeV (f$_\textrm{t}$ is the fake-rate for taus and f$_\textrm{sb}$ is inversely proportional to jet activity).
FTvsFSB_DiLepton_lowPt_CMS_Preliminary.png Figure 10: f$_\textrm{t}$-f$_\textrm{sb}$ for taus with p$_{\textrm{T}}$ between 20 and 40 GeV (f$_\textrm{t}$ is the fake-rate for taus and f$_\textrm{sb}$ is inversely proportional to jet activity).

Signal MC Generation

For signal, all LHE files are made using MADGRAPH 4.4.5 and then decayed and showered through PYTHIA 6 in CMSSW532patch4. We simulate gluon fusion production of a Heavy Higgs boson decaying to a pair of SM-like Higgs bosons, $gg \to H \to hh$ for $H$ mass ranging from 260 GeV to 360 GeV. Each $h$ can decay to $WW$, $ZZ$, $\tau\tau$, $bb$ and $\gamma\gamma$ ($h\rightarrow WW$, $h\rightarrow ZZ$, $h\rightarrow \tau\tau$, $h\rightarrow bb$, $h\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$) , for example, as shown in figure below. We generate a separate LHE file for each combination of $h$ decay modes, for each mass point of $H$ .

HeavyHiggsDecay_cropped.png Figure 11: Heavy higgs decays to 2 SM higgs. One of the SM higgs decays to WW, other to ZZ

We also simulate gluon fusion production of a heavy pseudo-scalar Higgs boson decaying to a SM-like Higgs boson and $Z$-boson, $gg \to A \to Zh$, for masses of $A$ between 260 GeV to 360 GeV. Z-boson can decay leptonically or otherwise and $h$ can decay to $WW$, $ZZ$, $\tau\tau$ or $\gamma\gamma$.

Each production and decay topology is generated exclusively, and combined according to the $H$, $A$, and $h$ branching ratios.These signal samples are generated model independently. To interpret the results in Two Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) scenario we use cross sections obtained from the SusHi (http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.3249) program and branching ratios for SM-like Higgs calculated using 2HDMC (http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.0851).

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf Asearchchannels.pdf r1 manage 26.9 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Asearchchannels.png r1 manage 37.5 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Couplings_2HDM.pdf r1 manage 24.0 K 2014-01-15 - 16:30 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Couplings_2HDM.png r1 manage 27.6 K 2014-01-15 - 16:30 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng EffRatvsRdxy_leptons.png r1 manage 66.1 K 2013-11-22 - 17:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_AtoZHiggs_Multilepton_ApprovalSuggestion_Dec062013.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_AtoZHiggs_Multilepton_ApprovalSuggestion_Dec062013.png r1 manage 104.3 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_AtoZhiggs_Approvalsuggerstion_Dec032013.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_AtoZhiggs_Approvalsuggerstion_Dec032013.png r1 manage 101.1 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_ALL_Approvalsuggestion_Dec032013.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_ALL_Approvalsuggestion_Dec032013.png r1 manage 106.7 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_Multilepton_Approvalsuggestion_Dec062013.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_HeavyHiggs_Multilepton_Approvalsuggestion_Dec062013.png r1 manage 108.6 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T1_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 27.8 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T1_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 111.5 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T1_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.pdf r1 manage 22.1 K 2013-12-04 - 22:23 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T1_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png r1 manage 117.9 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T1_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.pdf r1 manage 21.7 K 2013-12-07 - 17:27 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T1_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png r1 manage 144.2 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T2_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec040213.pdf r1 manage 19.0 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T2_AtoZHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec040213.png r1 manage 111.8 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T2_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.pdf r1 manage 23.2 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T2_HandA_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png r1 manage 121.6 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Exclusion_T2_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.pdf r1 manage 19.8 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Exclusion_T2_HeavyHiggs_CMS_Preliminary_Dec042013.png r1 manage 139.0 K 2013-12-04 - 22:21 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng FTvsFSB_DiLepton_highPt.png r1 manage 63.1 K 2013-11-22 - 17:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng FTvsFSB_DiLepton_lowPt.png r1 manage 63.1 K 2013-11-22 - 17:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf HeavyHiggsDecay_cropped.pdf r1 manage 28.4 K 2014-01-03 - 06:29 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng HeavyHiggsDecay_cropped.png r1 manage 23.2 K 2014-01-03 - 06:29 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Hsearchchannels.pdf r1 manage 24.4 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Hsearchchannels.png r1 manage 41.4 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L1GG_MET30to50_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L1GG_MET30to50_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013.png r1 manage 67.5 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L2GG_offZ_MET0to30_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L2GG_offZ_MET0to30_tau2gg0to30fit_19p5_Dec062013.png r1 manage 50.0 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau0DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.7 K 2013-12-16 - 04:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau0DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.png r1 manage 65.1 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau0DY1ZVZL_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2013-12-16 - 04:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau0DY1ZVZL_MET.png r1 manage 65.5 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY0SSJgt1b_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.6 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY0SSJgt1b_MET.png r1 manage 63.3 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY0SS_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY0SS_MET.png r1 manage 63.8 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.6 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY1Jgt1bZVZL_MET.png r1 manage 64.6 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY1Jgt1b_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2013-12-16 - 04:34 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY1Jgt1b_MET.png r1 manage 65.7 K 2013-12-16 - 04:36 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY1ZVZL_MET.pdf r1 manage 15.0 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY1ZVZL_MET.png r1 manage 66.8 K 2013-12-16 - 04:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L3Tau1DY1_MET.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2013-12-16 - 04:34 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L3Tau1DY1_MET.png r1 manage 68.1 K 2013-12-16 - 04:36 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1Tau0b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2013-12-18 - 06:03 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1Tau0b0_MET.png r1 manage 59.8 K 2013-12-18 - 06:03 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1Tau0b1_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2013-12-18 - 06:03 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1Tau0b1_MET.png r1 manage 62.7 K 2013-12-18 - 06:03 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1Tau1b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.4 K 2013-12-18 - 05:59 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1Tau1b0_MET.png r1 manage 61.2 K 2013-12-18 - 05:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1Tau1b1_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-18 - 05:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1Tau1b1_MET.png r1 manage 60.7 K 2013-12-18 - 05:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1ZVTau0b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.3 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1ZVTau0b0_MET.png r1 manage 62.1 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY1ZVTau1b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.4 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY1ZVTau1b0_MET.png r1 manage 61.0 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2Tau0b0_MET.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.5 K 2013-12-17 - 04:39 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2Tau0b0_MET.png r2 r1 manage 62.2 K 2013-12-17 - 04:39 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2Tau0b1_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.0 K 2013-12-05 - 20:39 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2Tau0b1_MET.png r2 r1 manage 60.7 K 2013-12-17 - 04:39 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2TwoZTau0b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.7 K 2013-12-16 - 04:26 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2TwoZTau0b0_MET.png r1 manage 65.9 K 2013-12-16 - 04:26 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2TwoZTau0b1_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.2 K 2013-12-16 - 04:26 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2TwoZTau0b1_MET.png r1 manage 61.4 K 2013-12-16 - 04:26 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2ZVTau0b0_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2ZVTau0b0_MET.png r1 manage 62.7 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf L4DY2ZVTau0b1_MET.pdf r1 manage 14.1 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng L4DY2ZVTau0b1_MET.png r1 manage 61.5 K 2013-12-17 - 04:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_fourleptons.pdf r1 manage 36.7 K 2014-01-02 - 04:58 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_fourleptons.png r1 manage 176.1 K 2014-01-02 - 04:58 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_leptautwogam.pdf r1 manage 27.4 K 2013-11-22 - 20:37 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_leptautwogam.png r1 manage 17.9 K 2013-11-22 - 20:36 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_oneleptwogam.pdf r1 manage 27.2 K 2013-11-22 - 20:35 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_oneleptwogam.png r1 manage 18.2 K 2013-11-22 - 20:35 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_systematic.pdf r1 manage 24.2 K 2013-11-22 - 20:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_systematic.png r1 manage 60.7 K 2013-11-22 - 20:37 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_threeleptons.pdf r1 manage 34.8 K 2014-01-02 - 04:58 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_threeleptons.png r1 manage 155.8 K 2014-01-02 - 04:58 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_twoleptwogam.pdf r1 manage 30.1 K 2013-11-22 - 20:34 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_twoleptwogam.png r1 manage 43.1 K 2013-11-22 - 20:34 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Results_table_twotautwogam.pdf r1 manage 27.5 K 2013-11-22 - 20:46 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Results_table_twotautwogam.png r1 manage 20.3 K 2013-11-22 - 20:46 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng STElMu_ST_controlLOG.png r1 manage 110.2 K 2013-11-22 - 17:00 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf SigmaBr_limit_table.pdf r1 manage 22.1 K 2014-02-21 - 13:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng SigmaBr_limit_table.png r1 manage 117.6 K 2014-02-21 - 13:44 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.pdf r1 manage 158.2 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png r1 manage 84.5 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.pdf r1 manage 164.4 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png r1 manage 123.8 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_hWW_BR.pdf r1 manage 69.3 K 2013-12-07 - 17:41 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_hWW_BR.png r1 manage 119.4 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_hZZ_BR.pdf r1 manage 70.5 K 2013-11-22 - 22:57 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_hZZ_BR.png r1 manage 127.3 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_hbb_BR.pdf r1 manage 63.8 K 2013-11-22 - 22:54 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_hbb_BR.png r1 manage 66.7 K 2013-11-23 - 17:38 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_hgaga_BR.pdf r1 manage 70.1 K 2013-12-07 - 17:42 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_hgaga_BR.png r1 manage 122.5 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T1_htata_BR.pdf r1 manage 63.8 K 2013-11-22 - 22:55 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T1_htata_BR.png r1 manage 66.5 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.pdf r1 manage 160.3 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_Azh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png r1 manage 98.8 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.pdf r1 manage 171.5 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_Hhh_plain_SusHi_Contour.png r1 manage 133.2 K 2013-12-19 - 04:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_hWW_BR.pdf r1 manage 75.7 K 2013-11-22 - 22:57 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_hWW_BR.png r1 manage 154.1 K 2013-11-23 - 17:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_hZZ_BR.pdf r1 manage 77.3 K 2013-11-22 - 22:56 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_hZZ_BR.png r1 manage 165.2 K 2013-11-23 - 17:14 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_hbb_BR.pdf r1 manage 72.2 K 2013-11-22 - 22:54 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_hbb_BR.png r1 manage 138.2 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_hgaga_BR.pdf r1 manage 79.6 K 2013-11-22 - 22:55 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_hgaga_BR.png r1 manage 175.1 K 2013-11-23 - 17:17 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf T2_htata_BR.pdf r1 manage 72.2 K 2013-11-22 - 22:56 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng T2_htata_BR.png r1 manage 138.0 K 2013-11-23 - 17:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT.png r1 manage 114.9 K 2013-11-22 - 17:19 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET.png r1 manage 106.8 K 2013-11-22 - 17:19 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf Tau2GG_MET0t030_RealFit_Dec062013.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng Tau2GG_MET0t030_RealFit_Dec062013.png r1 manage 56.4 K 2013-12-06 - 18:24 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng WZControl_DiLepton_MET.png r1 manage 102.9 K 2013-11-22 - 17:19 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng WZControl_DiLepton_MT_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 102.6 K 2013-11-22 - 17:26 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf finalstates_Azh.pdf r1 manage 22.5 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng finalstates_Azh.png r1 manage 10.5 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PDFpdf finalstates_heavyhiggs.pdf r1 manage 22.4 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng finalstates_heavyhiggs.png r1 manage 15.3 K 2013-12-07 - 18:53 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng fsr_mu3_invmass_19p5ifb_twiki.png r1 manage 63.7 K 2013-11-22 - 17:18 ShrutiPanwalkar  
PNGpng mass_dist_met0to50GeVL4onZMass_PFMETvsAllMass.png r1 manage 114.2 K 2013-11-22 - 17:15 ShrutiPanwalkar  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r26 < r25 < r24 < r23 < r22 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r26 - 2014-02-26 - ShrutiPanwalkar
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback