TWiki>
CMSPublic Web>PhysicsResults>LumiPublicResults>LumiPublicResultsPAS (2022-09-08, JoschaKnolle)
EditAttachPDF
CMSPublic Web>PhysicsResults>LumiPublicResults>LumiPublicResultsPAS (2022-09-08, JoschaKnolle) EditAttachPDF
|
|
CMS Luminosity Results From Public Documents
This page collects all of the approved, public luminosity calibration plots for Run 1. For similar information for Run 2, please consult the PhysicsResultsLUM twiki.- Physics Analysis Summaries (PAS)
- CMS Luminosity Based on Pixel Cluster Counting - Summer 2013 Update (CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001)
- CMS Luminosity Based on Pixel Cluster Counting - Summer 2012 Update (CMS-PAS-LUM-12-001)
- Absolute Calibration of the Luminosity Measurement at CMS: Winter 2012 Update (CMS-PAS-SMP-12-008)
- Absolute Calibration of Luminosity Measurement at CMS: Summer 2011 Update (CMS-PAS-EWK-11-001)
- Measurement of CMS Luminosity (CMS-PAS-EWK-10-004)
Links to Other Public CMS Results
- CMS public home page
- CMS public luminosity statistics
- CMS public luminosity results (Run 1, Run 2, ...)
- CMS public physics results
Physics Analysis Summaries (PAS)
The following figures are from the respective PASes. CMS Luminosity Based on Pixel Cluster Counting - Summer 2013 Update (CMS-PAS-LUM-13-001)
under construction
|
Beam-spot centroid longitudinal position as a function of the beam separation during
a horizontal scan. April 2012 campaign. The strong correlation (as observed) is due to the finite crossing angle. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam-spot centroid longitudinal position as a function of the beam separation during
a horizontal scan. November 2012 campaign. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Luminous region RMS in the vertical plane as a function of the beam separation during
a horizontal scan. April 2012 campaign. Non-factorisable beam charge density distributions are expected to produce correlations as observed in this scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Luminous region RMS in the vertical plane as a function of the beam separation during
a horizontal scan. November 2012 campaign. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Overview of the November VdM scans. The horizontal axis of the sketch lists the conditions of the scan (the axis of the scan and the offset), while the size of the peaks indicates the relative size of the observed rate. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Example of a rate profile fit. This specific case corresponds to BX 721 and scan pair number 0. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Estimates for the visible cross-section for each BX and head-on scan pair performed during fill 3316. The first four scans (two scan pairs) occurred consecutively within 1h, the last scan pair took place 2h later. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Length scale calibration. The relation between the measured center of the luminous region and the nominal crossing position for the horizontal scanning plane and both calibration fills. The two different markers/colors correspond to the two sets of scan points with opposite directions of approach. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Length scale calibration. The relation between the measured center of the luminous region and the nominal crossing position for the vertical scanning plane and both calibration fills. The two different markers/colors correspond to the two sets of scan points with opposite directions of approach. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Time dependency of the luminosity (black) and the beam currents product (red). Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Time evolution of the rate profile widths for each BX considered in the analysis. Solid (empty) crosses stands for horizontal (vertical) scans. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Orbit drift. Difference of the estimated beams orbits at the CMS IP in the horizontal (solid crosses) and vertical (empty crosses). Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam-beam deflection. Analytic estimation of the beam beam deflection as a function of the beam separation for parameters typical of fill 3316. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Pull - HF vs pixels. Distribution of the difference between of the rate profile widths as measured by the cluster counting method and by the HF divided by the statistical uncertainty. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Pixel clusters - relative contribution. Relative contributions of different pixel detector regions to the total cluster count as a function of the run number for the 2012 physics runs. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Pixel clusters relative contribution vs Pile-up. Pileup (upper plot) and relative contributions of different pixel detector regions (down) as a function of time during fill 3236. The drop in luminosity around 10h after the beginning is due to an end-of-fill VdM scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Pixel cluster efficiency. Pixel cluster efficiency drop for various detector components as a function of the instantaneous luminosity. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Pixel cluster efficiency. Pixel cluster efficiency drop for various detector components as a function of the L1 trigger rate. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam spot position. Distribution of the beam-spot in the longitudinal direction for the 2012 LHC run. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Cluster multiplicity vs vertex position. Expected number of hits as a function of the longitudinal position of the generated interaction vertex. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
CMS Luminosity Based on Pixel Cluster Counting - Summer 2012 Update (CMS-PAS-LUM-12-001)
|
The relation between the observed center of the luminous region and the nominal
position. The figure represents the horizontal scanning plane. The two different markers/colors correspond to the two sets of scan points with opposite directions of approach. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
The relation between the observed center of the luminous region and the nominal
position. The figure represents the vertical scanning plane. The two different markers/colors correspond to the two sets of scan points with opposite directions of approach. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam shape fits for the first Van der Meer scan (beam crossing 721) in LHC Fill 2520. Number of pixel clusters as a rate variable, X-plane scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam shape fits for the first Van der Meer scan (beam crossing 721) in LHC Fill 2520. Number of pixel clusters as a rate variable, Y-plane scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam shape fits for the first Van der Meer scan (beam crossing 721) in LHC Fill 2520. Number of vertices as a rate variable, X-plane scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Beam shape fits for the first Van der Meer scan (beam crossing 721) in LHC Fill 2520. Number of vertices as a rate variable, Y-plane scan. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
The evolution of the observed pixel cluster cross section as a function of the scan pair. There is a clear, so far not understood, upward trend. Awaiting further understanding this trend is taken into account as a systematic uncertainty. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Comparison between visible cross sections obtained during the Van der Meer scans. The figure represents the ratio between pixel cluster counting and HF zero-counting. Ratio scaled to average to unity. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Comparison between visible cross sections obtained during the Van der Meer scans. The figure represents the ratio between vertex counting and HF zero-counting. Ratio scaled to average to unity. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Comparison between visible cross sections obtained during the Van der Meer scans. The figure represents the ratio between BCM1F zero-counting and HF zero-counting. Ratio scaled to average to unity. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Results of the pixel afterglow ‘deconvolution fit’. The main difference with respect to 2011 lies in the ‘BX+1’ ghost response parameter a1. This effect is due to the minimum cluster size and charge cuts and does not affect the afterglow correction values. Linear scale version of the figure. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Results of the pixel afterglow ‘deconvolution fit’. The main difference with respect to 2011 lies in the ‘BX+1’ ghost response parameter a1. This effect is due to the minimum cluster size and charge cuts and does not affect the afterglow correction values. Logarithmic scale version of the figure. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Relative contributions of different pixel detector regions to the total cluster count. The shaded band indicates a \pm 1.5% window of stability for the contribution of the barrel to the overall cluster count. (The total barrel contribution is > 70%.) Full size version of the plot: 
| |
|
Relative contributions of different pixel detector regions to the total cluster count. The figure represents result sfor the forward pixel detector region. Full size version of the plot: 
| |
Absolute Calibration of the Luminosity Measurement at CMS: Winter 2012 Update (CMS-PAS-SMP-12-008)
|
Representative results from the May 2011 VdM scans Scan in the x plane for beam crossing 2752 using the mean number of pixels per zero-bias trigger as the rate variable. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Representative results from the May 2011 VdM scans Scan in the y plane for beam crossing 2752 using the mean number of pixels per zero-bias trigger as the rate variable. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Representative results from the May 2011 VdM scans Scan in the x plane for beam crossing 2752 using the mean number of vertices per zero-bias trigger as the rate variable. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Representative results from the May 2011 VdM scans Scan in the y plane for beam crossing 2752 using the mean number of vertices per zero-bias trigger as the rate variable. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
Absolute Calibration of Luminosity Measurement at CMS: Summer 2011 Update (CMS-PAS-EWK-11-001)
|
Cross section for vertex production plotted as a function of instantaneous singlebunch
luminosity The cross section measurement is based on the online calibration for the luminosity measurement. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Response of the HF online system to a single bunch with luminosity in BX0 The plot has been normalized such that the value in BX0 is one. Full size versions of the plot: 
| |
|
VdM scans using the HF Online method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1753 (May 2011) X scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
VdM scans using the HF Online method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1753 (May 2011) Y scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
VdM scans using the HF Online method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1875 (June 2011) X scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
VdM scans using the HF Online method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1875 (June 2011) Y scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
VdM scans using the offline simple-vertex-counting method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1753 (May 2011) X scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
VdM scans using the offline simple-vertex-counting method The figure represents the LHC Fill 1753 (May 2011) Y scan. Length-scale corrections have not been applied. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Calibration correction constants kx (left) and ky (right) for the 1041 bunches in the LHC Fill 1875 (June 2011) scans. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
Measurement of CMS Luminosity (CMS-PAS-EWK-10-004)
|
Relative luminosity versus bunch crossing Shown for LHC Fill 1089. The instantaneous luminosity during this fill was approximately 2 × 10^{28} cm^{−2} s^{−1}. Beams were colliding only in BX 1. BX’s 892 and 1786, which are not colliding bunches, are used to estimate the background levels for the various methods. Rates are shown for the HF online method as well as the two offline methods described below. In all cases, the luminosities were normalized to unity in BX 1, with the points for the HF online and offline methods displaced slightly so that all three points are visible. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Variables and cuts used on offline HF event selection
Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Van der Meer scan results
The figure represents the LHC fill 1058 X scan. The blue curve is the total double- Gaussian, the red curve is the core Gaussian (sig1), and the green curve is the Gaussian for the tails (sig2). Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Van der Meer scan results
The figure represents the LHC fill 1058 Y scan. The blue curve is the total double- Gaussian, the red curve is the core Gaussian (sig1), and the green curve is the Gaussian for the tails (sig2). Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Van der Meer scan results
The figure represents the LHC fill 1089 X scan. The blue curve is the total double- Gaussian, the red curve is the core Gaussian (sig1), and the green curve is the Gaussian for the tails (sig2). Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Van der Meer scan results
The figure represents the LHC fill 1089 Y scan. The blue curve is the total double- Gaussian, the red curve is the core Gaussian (sig1), and the green curve is the Gaussian for the tails (sig2). Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
|
Calibration relative to MC normalization
Shown at the five central zero points in the LHC Fill 1089. The different sets of points show the corrections as propagated from the four different pairs of measured x and y beam widths. The uncorrected points for the reverse x and forward y pair are also shown in black. Full size versions of the plot: 
pdf version
| |
| I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 png |
2012_ratio_Feb25.png | r1 | manage | 56.0 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:48 | StoyanStoynev | pixel cluster fractional contributions |
 pdf |
BXrates.pdf | r1 | manage | 25.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:34 | StoyanStoynev | Relative rates (2010) - pdf version |
| png |
BXrates.png | r1 | manage | 9.0 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:33 | StoyanStoynev | Relative rates (2010) |
| png |
CMSLogo.png | r1 | manage | 19.4 K | 2012-11-02 - 11:14 | StoyanStoynev | CMS logo |
| pdf |
HFOfflineCuts.pdf | r1 | manage | 99.6 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:35 | StoyanStoynev | Offline cuts (2010) - pdf version |
| png |
HFOfflineCuts.png | r1 | manage | 21.8 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:34 | StoyanStoynev | Offline cuts (2010) |
| pdf |
HFOnFill1753XBX81.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.1 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:43 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X May 2011 - pdf version |
| png |
HFOnFill1753XBX81.png | r1 | manage | 14.3 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:42 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X May 2011 |
| pdf |
HFOnFill1753YBX81.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.0 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:44 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y May 2011 - pdf version |
| png |
HFOnFill1753YBX81.png | r1 | manage | 14.6 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:44 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y May 2011 |
| pdf |
HFOnFill1875XBX45.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:46 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X June 2011 - pdf version |
| png |
HFOnFill1875XBX45.png | r1 | manage | 14.0 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:45 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X June 2011 |
| pdf |
HFOnFill1875YBX45.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.8 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:48 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y June 2011 - pdf version |
| png |
HFOnFill1875YBX45.png | r1 | manage | 14.5 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:47 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y June 2011 |
| png |
NovScan_sketch.png | r1 | manage | 124.6 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:30 | StoyanStoynev | VdM sketch (November 2012) |
| png |
SigmaVisComparison_scaledBCM1FoverHF.png | r1 | manage | 28.0 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:38 | StoyanStoynev | ratio of visible cross sections - BCM1F over HF |
| png |
SigmaVisComparison_scaledPixoverHF.png | r1 | manage | 28.3 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:37 | StoyanStoynev | ratio of visible cross sections - pixel over HF |
| png |
SigmaVisComparison_scaledVtxoverHF.png | r1 | manage | 28.3 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:38 | StoyanStoynev | ratio of visible cross sections - vertex over HF |
| png |
SingleBunchAfterglow.png | r1 | manage | 14.8 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:40 | StoyanStoynev | HF response (2011) |
| pdf |
VertexCrossSectionFromCounting.pdf | r1 | manage | 14.2 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:39 | StoyanStoynev | Vertex cross-section (2011) - pdf version |
| png |
VertexCrossSectionFromCounting.png | r1 | manage | 6.8 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:39 | StoyanStoynev | Vertex cross-section (2011) |
| pdf |
VertexOffFill1753XBX817.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.0 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:49 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X May 2011 (vertex) - pdf version |
| png |
VertexOffFill1753XBX817.png | r1 | manage | 15.5 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:49 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X May 2011 (vertex) |
| pdf |
VertexOffFill1753YBX817.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:51 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y May 2011 (vertex) - pdf version |
| png |
VertexOffFill1753YBX817.png | r1 | manage | 13.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:50 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y May 2011 (vertex) |
| png |
bb_example.png | r1 | manage | 32.0 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:40 | StoyanStoynev | beam-beam deflection |
| png |
bs_Z_jitter.png | r1 | manage | 5.8 K | 2013-12-17 - 15:01 | StoyanStoynev | beamspot Z jitter |
| png |
graph_pixel_model2b_scanpair0_bx721.png | r1 | manage | 236.2 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:34 | StoyanStoynev | rate profile |
| png |
graph_pixel_scan0_x_bx721.png | r1 | manage | 160.1 K | 2012-11-02 - 11:42 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2012, Fill 2520, BX 721, pixel |
| png |
graph_pixel_scan1_y_bx721.png | r1 | manage | 178.9 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:32 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2012, Fill 2520, BX 721, pixel |
| pdf |
graph_scan0_x_bx2752_all.pdf | r1 | manage | 239.0 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:11 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2011 (pixel) - pdf version |
| png |
graph_scan0_x_bx2752_all.png | r1 | manage | 18.1 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:10 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2011 (pixel) |
| pdf |
graph_scan1_y_bx2752_all.pdf | r1 | manage | 238.9 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:34 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2011 (pixel) - pdf version |
| png |
graph_scan1_y_bx2752_all.png | r1 | manage | 18.2 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:33 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2011 (pixel) |
| png |
graph_vertex_scan0_x_bx721.png | r1 | manage | 161.7 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:33 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2012, Fill 2520, BX 721, vertex |
| png |
graph_vertex_scan1_y_bx721.png | r1 | manage | 171.4 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:33 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2012, Fill 2520, BX 721, vertex |
| pdf |
kValuesJuneScan.pdf | r1 | manage | 14.5 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:52 | StoyanStoynev | Callibration correction constants (June 2011) - pdf version |
| png |
kValuesJuneScan.png | r1 | manage | 6.1 K | 2012-11-02 - 09:51 | StoyanStoynev | Callibration correction constants (June 2011) |
| png |
lumiN2slopes.png | r1 | manage | 10.0 K | 2013-12-16 - 22:08 | StoyanStoynev | lumi and beam current slopes |
| png |
lumi_mult_vs_vtxpos.png | r1 | manage | 16.2 K | 2013-12-17 - 15:04 | StoyanStoynev | cluster multiplicity vs vertex position |
| png |
mean_z_scanPlanex_Apr_new.png | r1 | manage | 15.1 K | 2013-12-15 - 18:16 | StoyanStoynev | Beam-spot centroid (April 2012) |
| png |
mean_z_scanPlanex_Nov_new.png | r1 | manage | 19.7 K | 2013-12-15 - 18:21 | StoyanStoynev | Beam-spot centroid (November 2012) |
| png |
orbitDrift.png | r1 | manage | 21.3 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:36 | StoyanStoynev | orbit drift |
| png |
pixel_afterglow_fill2580_fit_lin.png | r1 | manage | 226.5 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:40 | StoyanStoynev | Cluster count - linear |
| png |
pixel_afterglow_fill2580_fit_log.png | r1 | manage | 250.0 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:41 | StoyanStoynev | Cluster count - liogarithmic |
| png |
pixel_efficiency3.png | r1 | manage | 106.4 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:57 | StoyanStoynev | pixel cluster efficiecny vs ins. lumi |
| png |
pixel_efficiency4.png | r1 | manage | 112.9 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:57 | StoyanStoynev | pixel cluster efficiecny vs L1 trigger rate |
| png |
pixel_frac_barrel.png | r1 | manage | 90.1 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:42 | StoyanStoynev | Relative pixel detector region contributions - barrel |
| png |
pixel_frac_forward.png | r1 | manage | 120.3 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:43 | StoyanStoynev | Relative pixel detector region contributions - forward |
| png |
pull_HF_vs_pixels.png | r1 | manage | 13.9 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:44 | StoyanStoynev | pull HF vs pixels |
| png |
ratio_pileup.png | r1 | manage | 11.8 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:54 | StoyanStoynev | pile up and pixel cluster relative contributions |
| png |
rms_y_scanPlanex_Apr_new.png | r1 | manage | 20.8 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:19 | StoyanStoynev | Lumi region RMS, Y (April 2012) |
| png |
rms_y_scanPlanex_Nov_new.png | r1 | manage | 24.4 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:19 | StoyanStoynev | Lumi region RMS, Y (November 2012) |
| png |
sigmavis.png | r1 | manage | 11.3 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:37 | StoyanStoynev | visible cross-section (fill 3316) |
| png |
vdm_evolution_xsec_pixel.png | r1 | manage | 129.8 K | 2012-10-31 - 12:34 | StoyanStoynev | Evolution of the pixel cluster cross-section |
| pdf |
vertexVDMxFitScan1.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.0 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:35 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2011 (vertex) - pdf version |
| png |
vertexVDMxFitScan1.png | r1 | manage | 13.8 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:34 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2011 (vertex) |
| pdf |
vertexVDMyFitScan1.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.9 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:35 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2011 (vertex) - pdf version |
| png |
vertexVDMyFitScan1.png | r1 | manage | 13.7 K | 2012-10-31 - 11:35 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2011 (vertex) |
| png |
vtx_x_ls_scan_plane_x.png | r3 r2 r1 | manage | 151.3 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:21 | StoyanStoynev | length scale calibration (X) |
| png |
vtx_x_ls_scan_plane_x_NEW.png | r1 | manage | 163.8 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:53 | StoyanStoynev | new length scale calibration (X) |
| png |
vtx_y_ls_scan_plane_y.png | r3 r2 r1 | manage | 140.7 K | 2013-12-17 - 14:21 | StoyanStoynev | length scale calibration (Y) |
| png |
vtx_y_ls_scan_plane_y_NEW.png | r1 | manage | 168.2 K | 2013-12-16 - 21:53 | StoyanStoynev | new length scale calibration (Y) |
| png |
width_perBX.png | r1 | manage | 12.7 K | 2013-12-16 - 22:08 | StoyanStoynev | rate profile width vs time |
| pdf |
x-scan-2010-PAS-fill1058.pdf | r1 | manage | 56.5 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:37 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2010 - pdf version |
| png |
x-scan-2010-PAS-fill1058.png | r1 | manage | 26.2 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:36 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2010 |
| pdf |
xScan_1089_log.pdf | r1 | manage | 47.6 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:41 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2010 (fill 1089, log) - pdf version |
| png |
xScan_1089_log.png | r1 | manage | 13.1 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:41 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan X 2010 (fill 1089, log) |
| pdf |
y-scan-2010-PAS-fill1058.pdf | r1 | manage | 56.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:38 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2010 - pdf version |
| png |
y-scan-2010-PAS-fill1058.png | r1 | manage | 27.9 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:38 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2010 |
| pdf |
yScan_1089_log.pdf | r1 | manage | 47.6 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:43 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2010 (fill 1089, log) - pdf version |
| png |
yScan_1089_log.png | r1 | manage | 13.1 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:42 | StoyanStoynev | VdM scan Y 2010 (fill 1089, log) |
| pdf |
zero-points-calib-scan-2010-PAS-emit-corrected-fill1089.pdf | r1 | manage | 14.3 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:45 | StoyanStoynev | Calibration relative to MC (2010) - pdf version |
| png |
zero-points-calib-scan-2010-PAS-emit-corrected-fill1089.png | r1 | manage | 19.4 K | 2012-11-02 - 10:44 | StoyanStoynev | Calibration relative to MC (2010) |
Topic revision: r9 - 2022-09-08 - JoschaKnolle
-
CMSPublic Web
- CMSPrivate Web
-
Create New Topic
-
Index
-
Search
-
Changes
-
Notifications
-
Statistics
-
Preferences
Create a LeftBar
- ABATBEA
- ACPP
- ADCgroup
- AEGIS
- AfricaMap
- AgileInfrastructure
- ALICE
- AliceEbyE
- AliceSPD
- AliceSSD
- AliceTOF
- AliFemto
- ALPHA
- Altair
- ArdaGrid
- ASACUSA
- AthenaFCalTBAna
- Atlas
- AtlasLBNL
- AXIALPET
- CAE
- CALICE
- CDS
- CENF
- CERNSearch
- CLIC
- Cloud
- CloudServices
- CMS
- Controls
- CTA
- CvmFS
- DB
- DefaultWeb
- DESgroup
- DPHEP
- DM-LHC
- DSSGroup
- EGEE
- EgeePtf
- ELFms
- EMI
- ETICS
- FIOgroup
- FlukaTeam
- Frontier
- Gaudi
- GeneratorServices
- GuidesInfo
- HardwareLabs
- HCC
- HEPIX
- ILCBDSColl
- ILCTPC
- IMWG
- Inspire
- IPv6
- IT
- ItCommTeam
- ITCoord
- ITdeptTechForum
- ITDRP
- ITGT
- ITSDC
- LAr
- LCG
- LCGAAWorkbook
- Leade
- LHCAccess
- LHCAtHome
- LHCb
- LHCgas
- LHCONE
- LHCOPN
- LinuxSupport
- Main
- Medipix
- Messaging
- MPGD
- NA49
- NA61
- NA62
- NTOF
- Openlab
- PDBService
- Persistency
- PESgroup
- Plugins
- PSAccess
- PSBUpgrade
- R2Eproject
- RCTF
- RD42
- RFCond12
- RFLowLevel
- ROXIE
- Sandbox
- SocialActivities
- SPI
- SRMDev
- SSM
- Student
- SuperComputing
- Support
- SwfCatalogue
- TMVA
- TOTEM
- TWiki
- UNOSAT
- Virtualization
- VOBox
- WITCH
- XTCA
 |
|
Copyright &© 2008-2023 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback