Figure | Abbreviated Caption |
---|---|
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distributions from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV. The same reconstruction algorithm and analysis criteria are applied to PbPb and pp datasets, including a transverse momentum requirement on single muons of pT > 4 GeV/c. The solid (signal + background) and dashed (background-only) lines show the results of the simultaneous fit performed to the pp and PbPb datasets. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distributions from the pp data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV. The same reconstruction algorithm and analysis criteria are applied to PbPb and pp datasets, including a transverse momentum requirement on single muons of pT > 4 GeV/c. The solid (signal + background) and dashed (background-only) lines show the results of the simultaneous fit performed to the pp and PbPb datasets. |
![]() |
Centrality dependence of the double ratio [Υ(2S)/Υ(1S)]PbPb/[Υ(2S)/Υ(1S)]pp. The centrality bins are 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, and 50-100%. For each bin, the centrality percentile is specified; the point abscissae used correspond to the mean of the distribution of the expected number of participants Npart in the respective bin. The global uncertainty represented by a box at unity corresponds to the quadrature sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties from the fit to the pp data, and do not affect the point-to-point trend. |
![]() |
Centrality dependence of the nuclear modification factors, RAA, for the individual Υ(1S) and Υ(2S) states. The centrality bins are 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50%, and 50-100%. The uncertainties of 14% for Υ(1S) and 21% for Υ(2S), from Npart-independent quantities (luminosity, pp yields and efficiency), are represented by the boxes at unity, and are not included in the data points as these do not affect the point-to-point trend. |
![]() |
Variant of the previous plot, but also including the centrality-integrated values (minimum bias). |
Figure | Abbreviated Caption |
---|---|
![]() |
Comparison of RAA results for Y(nS) and 2011-run J/Ψ (preliminary results). The results are shown as a function of centrality and for the centrality-integrated case, displaying the quarkonium sequential suppression observed. |
![]() |
Comparison of the Υ(1S) and Υ(2S) nuclear modification factor RAA centrality dependence results to the 2011-run J/Ψ RAA measurement (preliminary). |
![]() |
Comparison of the Υ(1S) nuclear modification factor RAA centrality dependence result to the 2010-run Y(1S) RAA previous measurement (Published in JHEP 1205 (2012) 063![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Comparison of the Υ(1S) nuclear modification factor RAA centrality dependence result to theory prediction M. Strickland (arXiv:1207.5327v2![]() |
|
Comparison of the Υ(1S) nuclear modification factor RAA centrality dependence result to the Y(1S) RAA measurent by STAR (arXiv:1312.3675 |
![]() |
Strong-binding scenario (SBS) prediction, produced using the calculations performed in the paper Eur. Phys. J. A48 (2012) 72![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Comparison of the Υ(1S) and Υ(2S) nuclear modification factor RAA centrality dependence results to the Y(1S) RAA measured in the forward rapidity range (2.5<y<4) by ALICE (arXiv:1405.4493). The grey box at unity displays correlated systematic errors relative to the pp reference. On the right hand side a smaller panel is included, suggesting a comparison between centrality-integrated results. |
Figure | Abbreviated Caption |
---|---|
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV. The red line shows the fit to the PbPb data. The blue dashed line shows the shape obtained from the fit to the pp data. For a better comparison, the background shape, background yield, mass peak width, mass peak tail shape and the Y(1S) yields in the blue line are fixed to the PbPb fit, while the Y(2S)/Y(1S) and Y(3S)/Y(1S) ratios are fixed to the pp fit values. |
![]() |
Variant of the previous plot. Here, the dashed curve illustrates the corresponding signals in pp data, scaled by the RAA values. The Y(1S) state is apparently suppressed in PbPb with respect to pp, while the Y(2S) and Y(3S) states are suppressed significantly more. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 0-5%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 5-10%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 10-20%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 20-30%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 30-40%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 40-50%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
![]() |
Dimuon invariant-mass distribution from the PbPb data at sqrt(sNN) = 2.76 TeV, in the centrality bin 50-100%. Resolution and final state radiation fit parameters are fixed to the centrality-integrated (aka minimum bias) sample. |
|
The total signal efficiency, evaluated from PbPb and pp Monte Carlo simulation; shown as a function of the centrality of the PbPb collision (expressed by the number of participant nucleons). The error bars reflect the statistics of the MC sample, and the systematic uncertainties related to the kinematic distributions and to the MC validation through comparison with data.
|
|
The Y(1S)/Y(2S) efficiency ratio, evaluated from PbPb and pp Monte Carlo simulation; shown as a function of the centrality of the PbPb collision (expressed by the number of participant nucleons). The error bars reflect the statistics of the MC sample, and the systematic uncertainties related to the kinematic distributions.
|
![]() |
Estimations of the background shape used in the evaluation of systematic fit uncertainties, based on: (top) like-sign, (middle) track-rotated, and (bottom) opposite-sign dimuon spectra. |
I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Raa_AliceY1SY2S_MB_v2.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.9 K | 2013-08-20 - 19:27 | NicolasFilipovic | |
![]() |
Raa_AliceY1SY2S_MB_v2.png | r1 | manage | 139.6 K | 2013-08-20 - 20:27 | NicolasFilipovic | |
![]() |
Raa_AliceY1SY2S_MB_vFinal.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.8 K | 2014-07-02 - 12:24 | NicolasFilipovic | |
![]() |
UpsilonQM2014.png | r1 | manage | 18.5 K | 2014-05-20 - 15:47 | NicolasFilipovic | |
![]() |
UpsilonQMSTAR.png | r1 | manage | 13.7 K | 2014-05-20 - 15:47 | NicolasFilipovic | |
![]() |
upsilon_RAA_CMSSTAR.png | r1 | manage | 104.9 K | 2014-11-20 - 11:25 | LamiaBenhabib | |
![]() |
upsilon_RAA_CMSSTAR_2014.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.7 K | 2014-07-02 - 12:24 | NicolasFilipovic |