Boosted Top Jet Tagging at CMS

Abstract

Multiple techniques for reconstructing highly Lorentz-boosted, hadronically-decaying top quarks are studied. These techniques, including the CMS Top Tagger, the HEP Top Tagger, and N-subjettiness, use jet substructure and jet mass observables to identify “top-jets”. The efficiency and misidentification rate of these algorithms are compared, both with and without identification of b-quark subjets. The efficiency is measured in data and in simulation, and the ratio of these measurements is presented as a data-simulation scale factor

Plots and tables from the paper JME-13-007 ( click on plot to get .pdf )

Simulation

Tagging variables

CMS Combined Tagger - tagging variables
CA8 Jet mass for jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CA8 Jet mass after top tagging selections (Nsubjets ≥ 3, mmin > 50, τ3/τ2 < 0.55) for jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CMS Top Tagger minimum pairwise subjet mass for CA8 jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CMS Top Tagger minimum pairwise subjet mass after the N-subjettiness selection (τ3/τ2 < 0.55) for CA8 jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CA8 N-subjettiness ratio τ3/τ2 for jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CA8 N-subjettiness ratio τ3/τ2 after the CMS Top Tagger selection (Nsubjets ≥ 3, mmin > 50, 140 < mjet < 250 GeV/c2) for jets with pT > 500 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample

HEP Combined Tagger - tagging variables
HEP Top Tagger top jet mass (m123) for CA15 jets with pT > 200 GeV/c from a simulated tt MADGRAPH sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
HEP Top Tagger top jet mass (m123) after the HEP Top Tagger W mass selection for CA15 jets with pT > 200 GeV/c from a simulated tt MADGRAPH sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CA15 N-subjettiness ratio τ3/τ2 for jets with pT > 200 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
CA15 N-subjettiness ratio τ3/τ2 after the HEP Top Tagger top and W mass selections for jets with pT > 200 GeV/c from a simulated tt POWHEG sample and from a simulated QCD PYTHIA 6 sample
Bi-dimensional distributions of m23/m123 vs. atan(m13/m12) for HEP Top Tagger subjets from CA15 jets with pT > 200 GeV/c for a simulated tt (MADGRAPH) sample
Bi-dimensional distributions of m23/m123 vs. atan(m13/m12) for HEP Top Tagger subjets from CA15 jets with pT > 300 GeV/c for a simulated tt (MADGRAPH) sample
Bi-dimensional distributions of m23/m123 vs. atan(m13/m12) for HEP Top Tagger subjets from CA15 jets with pT > 400 GeV/c for a simulated tt (MADGRAPH) sample
Bi-dimensional distributions of m23/m123 vs. atan(m13/m12) for HEP Top Tagger subjets from CA15 jets with pT > 200 GeV/c for a simulated background sample (cross section weighted boson+jets, diboson, single-top, tt all-hadronic, and tt leptonic production)

ROC curves

ROC - low pT
Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency for the HEP Top Tagger and HEP Com- bined Tagger for jets matched to generated partons with pT > 200 GeV/c2. The mistag rate is measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo while the efficiency is measured with POWHEG tt Monte Carlo. R = 1.5 jets are used for all algorithms. A mass cut of 140 < m123 < 250 GeV/c2 is required. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while back- ground jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. The CMS Top Tagger and CMS Combined Tagger are not considered for this pT range because the decay products of tops with pT close to the 200 GeV/c are rarely merged within R=0.8 jets.

ROC - medium-high pT
Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency as measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo and POWHEG tt Monte Carlo, respectively. In the cases where a jet mass cut is applied, the cut is not varied and is fixed at 140 < mjet < 250GeV/c2. N-subjettiness is calculated using R = 0.8 jets except when used in combination with the HEP Top Tagger in which case R = 1.5 jets are used. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while background jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. Distributions are shown for three pT selections, where the pT cut is applied to the matched generated parton.

Working Point Definitions

Working points for the HEP Combined Tagger
Working points for the CMS Combined Tagger

Pileup

Slope of tagging efficiency and mistag rate (in percent) vs Nvtx for different tagging selections and pT > 500 GeV/c.

Data/MC comparison

CMS Combined Tagger

CMS Combined Tagger - semileptonic selection
Number of subjets for full merged top jet candidate in the hadronic hemisphere after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. This distribution is used to evaluate the sequential top-tagging efficiency SF.
Minimum subjet pairwise mass after the selection Nsubjets>=3 for full merged top jet candidates in the hadronic hemisphere after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. This distribution is used to evaluate the sequential top-tagging efficiency SF. The mmin distribution is not well modeled by the simulation. This effect may be due to mis-modeling of radiation within the top jet or merged subjets at very high jet momenta. The discrepancy is most evident at large jet pseudorapidity and therefore we choose to measure a pseudorapidity-dependent scale fac- tor.
CA8 jet mass after the selections Nsubjets>=3 and mmin>50 for full merged top jet candidate in the hadronic hemisphere after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. This distribution is used to evaluate the sequential top-tagging efficiency SF.
Nsubjettiness ratio τ3/τ2 after the selections Nsubjets>=3, mmin>50, 140<mjet<250 for full merged top jet candidate in the hadronic hemisphere after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. This distribution is used to evaluate the sequential top-tagging efficiency SF.
Maximum subjet CSV b-discriminant after the selections Nsubjets>=3, mmin>50, 140<mjet<250, and τ3/τ2 < 0.55 for full merged top jet candidate in the hadronic hemisphere after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. This distribution is used to evaluate the sequential top-tagging efficiency SF.
Jet mass for fully-merged top candidates from the semileptonic sample after selections Nsubjets>=3, mmin>50, 140<mjet<250, and τ3/τ2 < 0.55. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
Jet mass for fully-merged top candidates from the semileptonic sample after selections Nsubjets>=3, mmin>50, 140<mjet<250, τ3/τ2 < 0.55 and CSV-medium b-tag. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.

HEP Combined Tagger

CA15 jet pT
Distribution of the pT of the Cambridge Aachen R=1.5 top candidate jet after all the selection cuts, but before applying the HEP Top Tagger. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.

HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) - 3 pT regions
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) for CA15 jet pT > 200 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) for CA15 jet pT > 300 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) for CA15 jet pT > 400 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.

HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) after W mass selection - 3 pT regions
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) after the W mass selection but before the top mass selection for CA15 jet pT > 200 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) after the W mass selection but before the top mass selection for CA15 jet pT > 300 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.
HEP Top Tagger top mass distribution (m123) after the W mass selection but before the top mass selection for CA15 jet pT > 400 GeV/c. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator. The m123 top mass peak is not well-modeled by simulation.

HEP Top Tagger W mass selection
Bi-dimensional distributions of m23/m123 vs. atan(m13/m12) for HEP Top Tagger jets in data (semi- leptonic selection). The area enclosed by the black lines denotes the region selected by the HEP Top Tagger W mass selection.

Type 2 tagger

(a) Pruned jet mass of the leading jet in the hadronic hemisphere. This is the hadronic W boson candidate for partially merged “type 2” top quark candidates after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event gen- erator. “NTMJ” represents non-top multijet backgrounds. These are measured in data by reversing the mass drop selection and normalizing through a fit to the HT distribution. The shaded regions represent the total uncertainty on the background model.
Subjet Mass drop μ for the W boson candidate in the hadronic hemisphere for partially merged “type 2” top quark candidates after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event gen- erator. “NTMJ” represents non-top multijet backgrounds. These are measured in data by reversing the mass drop selection and normalizing through a fit to the HT distribution. The shaded regions represent the total uncertainty on the background model.
Pairwise mass of the W boson candidate and the closest jet in ∆R for partially merged “type 2” top quark candidates after the semileptonic selection. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event gen- erator. “NTMJ” represents non-top multijet backgrounds. These are measured in data by reversing the mass drop selection and normalizing through a fit to the HT distribution. The shaded regions represent the total uncertainty on the background model.

Scale Factors

Efficiencies in data and simulation for each successive cut in the CMS Top Tagger, and for the addition of N-subjettiness and subjet b-tagging (CMS Combined Tagger WP3), as measured using the semileptonic selection. The denominator of each quoted efficiency is the number of events passing the previous selection. The efficiency is measured for three tt Monte Carlo generators (MADGRAPH, POWHEG, and MC@NLO).
Data-simulation scale factors for three Monte Carlo generators for each successive cut in the CMS Top Tagger WP0, and for the addition of N-subjettiness and subjet b-tagging (CMS combined tagger WP3), as measured with the semileptonic selection. The scale factor measured in each row is with respect to the events passing the selection in the previous row. The scale factor is measured for three tt Monte Carlo generators (MADGRAPH, POWHEG, and MC@NLO). Only 21 events in the semileptonic selection in data survive the CMS and N-subjettiness selec- tions and therefore the subjet b-tagging scale factor measurement lacks statistics. If measured after the minmass selection or after the CMS Top Tagger selection the subjet b-tag scale factor is consistent with 1.
Efficiencies in data and simulation for each successive cut in the CMS Top Tagger, and for the addition of N-subjettiness and subjet b-tagging (CMS Combined Tagger WP3), as measured using the semileptonic selection. The denominator of each quoted efficiency is the number of events passing the previous selection. The efficiency is measured for three tt Monte Carlo generators (MADGRAPH, POWHEG, and MC@NLO).
Data-simulation scale factors after requiring all selections of the HEP Combined Tagger WP2 and after requiring all selections of the HEP Combined Tagger WP3. The scale factor is measured for three tt Monte Carlo generators in three pT regions and in two η regions. The scale factor is measured with the semileptonic selection with subjet b-tagging.
Data-simulation scale factors for each sequential selection of the HEP Combined Tagger WP3. The scale factor measured in each row is with respect to the events passing the selection in the previous row. The scale factor is measured for three tt Monte Carlo generators in three pT regions and in two η regions. The scale factor is measured with the semileptonic selection with subjet b-tagging.

Supplementary plots ( click on plot to get .pdf )

Simulation plots

ROC curves

Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency for multiple combinations of subjet b-tagging and other top tagging algorithms, as measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo and POWHEG tt Monte Carlo, respectively. In the cases where a jet mass cut is applied, the cut is not varied and is fixed at 140 < mjet < 250GeV/c2. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while background jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. Distributions are shown for three pT selections, where the pT cut is applied to the matched generated parton.
Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency for multiple combinations of N-subjettiness and other top tagging algorithms, as measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo and POWHEG tt Monte Carlo, respectively. In the cases where a jet mass cut is applied, the cut is not varied and is fixed at 140 < mjet < 250GeV/c2. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while background jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. Distributions are shown for three pT selections, where the pT cut is applied to the matched generated parton.
Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency for multiple combinations of the HEP Top Tagger along with other top tagging algorithms, as measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo and POWHEG tt Monte Carlo, respectively. In the cases where a jet mass cut is applied, the cut is not varied and is fixed at 140 < mjet < 250GeV/c2. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while background jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. Distributions are shown for three pT selections, where the pT cut is applied to the matched generated parton.

Mistag rate vs. top-jet tagging efficiency for the CMS Combined Tagger and HEP Combined Tagger, as measured from QCD PYTHIA 6 Monte Carlo and POWHEG tt Monte Carlo, respectively. Signal jets are matched to simulated all-hadronic generated top quarks, while background jets are matched to simulated partons from the hard scatter. Distributions are shown for four pT selections, where the pT cut is applied to the matched generated parton.

Data/MC comparison plots

CMS Combined Tagger

Minimum pairwise mass - Compare generators - 3 eta regions
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for all eta (abs(eta)<2.4) for ttbar simulated with three event generators in addition to addional non-ttbar backgrounds.
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0) for ttbar simulated with three event generators in addition to addional non-ttbar backgrounds.
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4) for ttbar simulated with three event generators in addition to addional non-ttbar backgrounds.

Minimum pairwise mass in 2 eta regions - MADGRAPH
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0) with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4) with the MADGRAPH event generator.

Minimum pairwise mass in 2 eta regions - POWHEG
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0) with the POWHEG event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4) with the POWHEG event generator.

Minimum pairwise mass in 2 eta regions - MC@NLO
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0) with the MC@NLO event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet minimum pairwise mass for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4) with the MC@NLO event generator.

Subjet pairwise mass - all eta - MADGRAPH
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m12 for all eta (abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m13 for all eta (abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m23 for all eta (abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.

Subjet pairwise mass - central eta - MADGRAPH
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m12 for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<1.0. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m13 for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<1.0. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m23 for central eta (abs(eta)<1.0). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and abs(eta)<1.0. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.

Subjet pairwise mass - high eta - MADGRAPH
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m12 for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and 1.0<abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m13 for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and 1.0<abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.
CMS Top Tagger subjet pairwise mass m23 for high eta (1.0<abs(eta)<2.4). Subjets are numbered based on subjet pT, with subjet 1 being the leading subjet. Subjets are found by the CMS Top Tagger using CA8 jets with pT>400 and 1.0<abs(eta)<2.4. tt is simulated with the MADGRAPH event generator.

HEP Combined Tagger

HEP subjet pairwise mass - MADGRAPH
Invariant mass of the combination of the two highest pT subjets in the CA15 Jet after a semileptonic selection
Invariant mass of the combination of the pT-ordered subjets in position 1 and 3 in the CA15 jet after a semileptonic selection
Invariant mass of the combination of the pT-ordered subjets in position 2 and 3 in the CA15 jet after a semileptonic selection

HEP W-tag variables - before W mass selection - MADGRAPH
Distribution of the arctangent of the ratio of m_13 and m_12 for subjets of CA15 jets after a semileptonic selection, where m_ij is the invariant mass of the combination of the pT-oredered subjets in position i and j.
Distribution of the ratio of m_23 and m_123 for subjets of CA15 jets after a semileptonic selection, where m_ij is the invariant mass of the combination of the pT-oredered subjets in position i and j, and m_123 is the jet mass obtained from the sum of the three subjets.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the two subjets whose mass is closest to the W mass from CA15 Jets after a semileptonic selection.

HEP W-tag variables - after W mass selection - MADGRAPH
Distribution of the arctangent of the ratio of m_13 and m_12 for subjets of CA15 jets after a semileptonic selection, where m_ij is the invariant mass of the combination of the pT-oredered subjets in position i and j. The HEP Top Tagger W mass selection has been applied.
Distribution of the ratio of m_23 and m_123 for subjets of CA15 jets after a semileptonic selection, where m_ij is the invariant mass of the combination of the pT-oredered subjets in position i and j, and m_123 is the jet mass obtained from the sum of the three subjets. The HEP Top Tagger W mass selection has been applied.
Distribution of the invariant mass of the two subjets whose mass is closest to the W mass from CA15 Jets after a semileptonic selection. The HEP Top Tagger W mass selection has been applied.

Diagrams and flowcharts

CMS Top Tagger
Cartoon demonstrating the two stage application of the CMS Top Tagger decomposition procedure. The jet is declustered into A and B. A and B are then individually declustered into A' A'' and B' B''
Flowchart of the CMS Top Tagger decomposition procedure
An example decomposition using the CMS Top Tagger

HEP Top Tagger
HEP Top Tagger algorithm description
Labeled HEP Top Tagger W mass selection in bi-dimensional plane
Flowchart for HEP Top Tagger mass drop decomposition procedure
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 1 - mass drop decomposition. The circles represent PF constituents. The circle radius is proportional to the constituent momentum. The colors represent subjets found by the decomposition. Some constituents are discarded during the decomposition process.
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 2 - consider all combinations of 3 mass drop subjets.
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 3 - recluster each combination of three mass drop subjets. Distance parameter is determined by the separation between the two closest mass drop subjets in each combination. The hollow blue circles represent subjets found by the reclustering.
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 4 - jet filtering. Keep only the 5 leading subjets.
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 5 - filter all combinations of 3 mass drop subjets
HEP Top Tagger cartoon 6 - keep the combination with filtered mass closest to the top mass. Recluster to force 3 subjets.

-- JamesDolen - 14 Jan 2014

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf CMScartoon.pdf r1 manage 69.7 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PNGpng CMScartoon.png r1 manage 18.0 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf CMSexample.pdf r1 manage 70.6 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PNGpng CMSexample.png r1 manage 401.1 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf CMSflowchart.pdf r1 manage 69.7 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PNGpng CMSflowchart.png r1 manage 144.5 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_JETMASS_HTT_QCD_JETMASS_HTT_TTBAR_JetPt200.pdf r1 manage 16.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_JETMASS_HTT_QCD_JETMASS_HTT_TTBAR_JetPt200.png r1 manage 142.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_JETMASS_QCD_JETMASS_TTBAR_JetPt200.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_JETMASS_QCD_JETMASS_TTBAR_JetPt200.png r1 manage 132.3 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_NSUB_HTT_QCD_NSUB_HTT_TTBAR_JetPt200.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_NSUB_HTT_QCD_NSUB_HTT_TTBAR_JetPt200.png r1 manage 131.3 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_NSUB_QCD_NSUB_TTBAR_JetPt200.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_NSUB_QCD_NSUB_TTBAR_JetPt200.png r1 manage 122.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_TT_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_TT_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_JetPt500DifferentBinning.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-01-27 - 16:38 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_TT_MASS_CUT_PT_NSUB_MMIN_T32P_JetPt500DifferentBinning.png r1 manage 150.1 K 2014-01-27 - 16:38 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MASS_CUT_PT_TT_MASS_CUT_PT_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2014-01-27 - 16:38 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MASS_CUT_PT_TT_MASS_CUT_PT_JetPt500.png r1 manage 123.9 K 2014-01-27 - 16:38 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_T32P_TT_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_T32P_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.3 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_T32P_TT_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_T32P_JetPt500.png r1 manage 149.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_TT_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_TT_MINM_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_JetPt500.png r1 manage 134.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_MINM_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_MINM_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_MINM_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_NSUB_MINM_JetPt500.png r1 manage 156.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_MASS_JetPt500.png r1 manage 124.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_JetPt500.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Draw2HistogramsFrom1File_QQ_T32P_CUT_PT_TT_T32P_CUT_PT_JetPt500.png r1 manage 117.4 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page1.pdf r1 manage 33.1 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page1.png r1 manage 111.0 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page2.pdf r1 manage 45.8 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page2.png r1 manage 182.6 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page3.pdf r1 manage 40.9 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page3.png r1 manage 148.6 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page4.pdf r1 manage 34.2 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page4.png r1 manage 154.9 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page5.pdf r1 manage 58.7 K 2014-01-28 - 21:07 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page5.png r1 manage 296.7 K 2014-01-28 - 21:07 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page6.pdf r1 manage 32.8 K 2014-01-28 - 21:07 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEPTopTaggerCartoonForNote_Page6.png r1 manage 126.1 K 2014-01-28 - 21:07 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEP_Wmass_selection.pdf r1 manage 435.1 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEP_Wmass_selection.png r1 manage 471.0 K 2014-01-28 - 21:06 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEP_flowchart_massdrop.pdf r1 manage 41.9 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEP_flowchart_massdrop.png r1 manage 158.5 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf HEP_one_slide_description.pdf r1 manage 287.7 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PNGpng HEP_one_slide_description.png r1 manage 652.2 K 2014-01-28 - 21:04 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 147.9 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 148.3 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_pt300hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 18.2 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_pt300hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 154.5 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_pt300histshtt_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 17.6 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_pt300histshtt_Canvas.png r1 manage 156.2 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_pt400hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_pt400hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 157.2 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf MassTop_pt400histshtt_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng MassTop_pt400histshtt_Canvas.png r1 manage 141.8 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists.pdf r1 manage 47.2 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists.png r1 manage 186.5 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Background_Add.pdf r1 manage 66.5 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Background_Add.png r1 manage 228.2 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Signal_Add.pdf r1 manage 78.9 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Signal_Add.png r1 manage 252.7 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_pt300hists_Signal_Add.pdf r1 manage 72.4 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_pt300hists_Signal_Add.png r1 manage 257.3 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_pt400hists_Signal_Add.pdf r1 manage 49.1 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Pheno2DPlot_HTT2D_pt400hists_Signal_Add.png r1 manage 197.3 K 2014-01-27 - 16:51 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf Toppt_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng Toppt_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 149.1 K 2014-01-27 - 19:30 JamesDolen  
Compressed Zip archivezip cms_top_tagger_plots_with_text.zip r1 manage 1697.8 K 2014-01-23 - 17:58 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf m01_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.4 K 2014-01-21 - 17:34 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng m01_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 138.4 K 2014-01-21 - 17:35 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf m02_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.5 K 2014-01-21 - 17:35 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng m02_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 135.4 K 2014-01-21 - 17:36 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf m12_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.3 K 2014-01-21 - 17:36 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng m12_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 133.8 K 2014-01-21 - 17:37 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf mistag_effic_HEP200_SideLegend_log.pdf r1 manage 42.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:37 JamesDolen  
PNGpng mistag_effic_HEP200_SideLegend_log.png r1 manage 137.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf roc_selectedBest.pdf r1 manage 43.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PNGpng roc_selectedBest.png r1 manage 362.0 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf roc_selectedBest2.pdf r1 manage 42.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PNGpng roc_selectedBest2.png r1 manage 196.0 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf roc_selectedBtag.pdf r1 manage 28.4 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng roc_selectedBtag.png r1 manage 283.4 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf roc_selectedHEP.pdf r1 manage 65.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng roc_selectedHEP.png r1 manage 235.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:34 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf roc_selectedTau32.pdf r1 manage 29.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng roc_selectedTau32.png r1 manage 298.3 K 2014-01-23 - 20:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_TTWeight.png r1 manage 139.9 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 130.3 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet12mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 126.7 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_TTWeight.png r1 manage 127.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 138.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet13mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 125.9 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_TTWeight.png r1 manage 139.9 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 136.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_subjet23mass_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 130.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_t1TopMasspostbmax_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 14.9 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_t1TopMasspostbmax_TTWeight.png r1 manage 123.0 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMassNewSel_t1TopMassposttau32_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.2 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMassNewSel_t1TopMassposttau32_TTWeight.png r1 manage 128.9 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.8 K 2014-01-29 - 03:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight.png r2 r1 manage 153.8 K 2014-01-29 - 03:13 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight_eta_range1.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.8 K 2014-01-29 - 03:16 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight_eta_range1.png r2 r1 manage 151.9 K 2014-01-29 - 03:16 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight_eta_range2.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.1 K 2014-01-29 - 03:16 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_MinPairHist_GenttbarComp_TTWeight_eta_range2.png r2 r1 manage 158.5 K 2014-01-29 - 03:17 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_mTopCand.pdf r1 manage 24.9 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_mTopCand.png r1 manage 131.1 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_mWCand.pdf r1 manage 28.6 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_mWCand.png r1 manage 200.4 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_muHist.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_muHist.png r1 manage 127.3 K 2014-01-28 - 17:41 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1BMax_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1BMax_TTWeight.png r1 manage 150.0 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_MCATNLO_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_MCATNLO_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 133.7 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_MCATNLO_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_MCATNLO_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 137.3 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_POWHEG_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_POWHEG_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 132.8 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_POWHEG_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_POWHEG_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 137.1 K 2014-01-27 - 23:55 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_TTWeight.png r1 manage 137.2 K 2014-01-23 - 20:11 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_eta_range1_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.8 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_eta_range1_TTWeight.png r1 manage 136.5 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_eta_range2_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 16.2 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1MinimumPairwiseMass_eta_range2_TTWeight.png r1 manage 141.1 K 2014-01-27 - 23:54 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1Nsubjets_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 15.1 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1Nsubjets_TTWeight.png r1 manage 135.5 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1Tau32_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1Tau32_TTWeight.png r1 manage 127.9 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf semiLepMass_t1TopMass_TTWeight.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2014-01-23 - 20:12 JamesDolen  
PNGpng semiLepMass_t1TopMass_TTWeight.png r1 manage 129.6 K 2014-01-23 - 20:10 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf table_pileup.pdf r1 manage 129.3 K 2014-01-28 - 00:35 JamesDolen  
PNGpng table_pileup.png r1 manage 69.2 K 2014-01-28 - 00:35 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf table_wp_cms.pdf r1 manage 125.7 K 2014-01-28 - 00:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng table_wp_cms.png r1 manage 82.1 K 2014-01-28 - 00:36 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf table_wp_hep.pdf r1 manage 129.3 K 2014-01-28 - 00:36 JamesDolen  
PNGpng table_wp_hep.png r1 manage 61.0 K 2014-01-28 - 00:36 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF1.pdf r1 manage 98.4 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF1.png r1 manage 82.7 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF2.pdf r1 manage 98.4 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF2.png r1 manage 81.1 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF3.pdf r1 manage 149.9 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF3.png r1 manage 139.4 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF4.pdf r1 manage 149.9 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF4.png r1 manage 135.1 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF5.pdf r1 manage 144.9 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF5.png r1 manage 136.3 K 2014-01-28 - 17:26 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf tables_SF6.pdf r1 manage 131.7 K 2014-01-28 - 17:30 JamesDolen  
PNGpng tables_SF6.png r1 manage 185.0 K 2014-01-28 - 17:30 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf var1_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.1 K 2014-01-21 - 17:37 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng var1_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 149.1 K 2014-01-21 - 17:38 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf var1_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 20.7 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
PNGpng var1_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 166.7 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf var2_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.2 K 2014-01-21 - 17:38 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng var2_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 148.0 K 2014-01-21 - 17:39 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf var2_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 19.1 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
PNGpng var2_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 150.9 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
PDFpdf var3_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.4 K 2014-01-21 - 17:39 EmanueleUsai  
PNGpng var3_HTT_NOheptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r2 r1 manage 142.9 K 2014-01-21 - 17:40 EmanueleUsai  
PDFpdf var3_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.pdf r1 manage 18.6 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
PNGpng var3_HTT_heptoptag_NOmasscut_hists_Canvas.png r1 manage 146.6 K 2014-01-28 - 00:48 JamesDolen  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r12 < r11 < r10 < r9 < r8 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r12 - 2014-01-29 - JamesDolen
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback