I | Attachment | History | Action | Size | Date | Who | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Fig1_bottom_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.1 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:00 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig1_bottom_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.6 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:01 | SunilBansal | ratio of particle density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig1_bottom_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.9 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:03 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy/particle density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig1_top_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:04 | SunilBansal | energy density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig1_top_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.2 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:06 | SunilBansal | particle density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig1_top_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:09 | SunilBansal | energy/particle density for MC and Data in towards + transverse region (Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_bottom_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:05 | SunilBansal | energy density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_bottom_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.9 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:08 | SunilBansal | particle density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_bottom_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 16.6 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:11 | SunilBansal | energy/particle density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_centre_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:05 | SunilBansal | energy density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_centre_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.5 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:07 | SunilBansal | particle density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_centre_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.8 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:10 | SunilBansal | energy/particle density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_top_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.8 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:06 | SunilBansal | energy density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_top_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.1 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:08 | SunilBansal | particle density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig2_top_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.0 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:10 | SunilBansal | energy/particle density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_bottom_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.1 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:01 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_bottom_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 20.1 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:02 | SunilBansal | ratio of particle density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_bottom_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.2 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:04 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy/particle density for MC and Data in away region (Δφ > 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_centre_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.5 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:00 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_centre_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:02 | SunilBansal | ratio of particle density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_centre_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.2 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:03 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy/particle density for MC and Data in transverse region (60 < Δφ < 120 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_top_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 17.3 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:01 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_top_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.4 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:02 | SunilBansal | ratio of particle density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig3_top_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.8 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:03 | SunilBansal | ratio of energy/particle density for MC and Data in towards region (Δφ < 60 degrees) |
![]() |
Fig4_bottom_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.5 K | 2011-12-13 - 04:59 | SunilBansal | comparison of transverse momentum of tracks in transverse region for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 and for events with dimuon transverse momentum < 5 GeV/c |
![]() |
Fig4_bottom_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 22.6 K | 2011-12-13 - 04:59 | SunilBansal | comparison of transverse momentum of tracks in towards, transverse and away region for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 |
![]() |
Fig4_bottom_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 23.2 K | 2011-12-13 - 04:59 | SunilBansal | comparison of transverse momentum of tracks in transverse region for MC and data for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 |
![]() |
Fig4_top_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.8 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:07 | SunilBansal | comparison of track multiplicity in transverse region for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 and for events with dimuon transverse momentum < 5 GeV/c |
![]() |
Fig4_top_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 23.2 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:08 | SunilBansal | comparison of track multiplicity in towards, transverse and away region for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 |
![]() |
Fig4_top_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 21.3 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:06 | SunilBansal | comparison of track multiplicity in transverse region for MC and data for events having invariant mass in [81-101] GeV/c2 |
![]() |
Fig5_centre.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.5 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:04 | SunilBansal | comparison of energy density in transverse region in leading jet and DY events |
![]() |
Fig5_left.pdf | r1 | manage | 18.9 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:07 | SunilBansal | comparison of particle density in transverse region in leading jet and DY events |
![]() |
Fig5_right.pdf | r1 | manage | 19.6 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:10 | SunilBansal | comparison of energy/particle density in transverse region in leading jet and DY events |
![]() |
Figure1.png | r2 r1 | manage | 114.7 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:01 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure21.png | r1 | manage | 76.7 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:05 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure22.png | r1 | manage | 83.5 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:05 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure23.png | r1 | manage | 86.0 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:05 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure31.png | r1 | manage | 71.0 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:26 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure32.png | r1 | manage | 76.2 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:27 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure33.png | r1 | manage | 72.6 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:27 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure41.png | r1 | manage | 81.7 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:27 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure42.png | r1 | manage | 89.1 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:27 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Figure5.png | r1 | manage | 51.9 K | 2011-12-12 - 14:28 | SunilBansal | |
![]() |
Table.pdf | r1 | manage | 26.8 K | 2011-12-13 - 05:11 | SunilBansal | Summary of systematic uncertainty |
![]() |
Table.png | r1 | manage | 36.1 K | 2011-12-12 - 15:33 | SunilBansal |