Figure | Abbreviated Caption![]() |
---|---|
![]() |
Fig 1a: Distribution of missing transverse energy ETmiss for SM MC and data after preselection. The MC distributions for the LM13 benchmark point are also shown. |
![]() |
Fig 1b: Distribution of scalar sum of jet transverse energies (HT) for SM MC and data after preselection. The MC distributions for the LM13 benchmark point are also shown. |
![]() |
Fig 1c: Distribution of dilepton invariant mass m(ll) for SM MC and data after preselection. The MC distributions for the LM13 benchmark point are also shown. |
![]() |
Fig 2: Distribution of ETmiss vs HT for data. The high ETmiss (high HT) signal region is indicated with the blue dotted (red striped) region. |
![]() |
Fig 3a: HT distribution in the ttbar region. |
![]() |
Fig 3b: Standard Model background enhanced sample depicting the effectiveness of the cut of abs{∆φ(MHT, j2)} < 0.15 in selecting a high purity sample of QCD events. |
![]() |
Fig 3c: MHT distribution in the Z→μμ + jets control region used to estimate Z→νν + jets. |
![]() |
Fig 3d: MET distribution in the W + jets control region after subtraction of all other backgrounds. |
![]() |
Fig 4a: MET in a "loose" signal region without requiring τh isolation to enhance the statistics and compare the data-driven estimation of backgrounds with the observed distribution from data. |
![]() |
Fig 4b: MHT in a "loose" signal region without requiring hadronic tau isolation to enhance the statistics and compare the data-driven estimation of backgrounds with the observed distribution from data. |
![]() |
Fig 4c: Invariant mass of the like-sign τ pairs in a "loose" signal region without requiring hadronic tau isolation to enhance the statistics and compare the data-driven estimation of backgrounds with the observed distribution from data. |
![]() |
Fig 4d: ∆φ(j1,MHT) in a "loose" signal region without requiring τh isolation to enhance the statistics and compare the data-driven estimation of backgrounds with the observed distribution from data. |