A search for new physics is performed using events with isolated same-sign leptons and at least two b-quark jets in the final state. Results are based on a sample of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV collected with the CMS detector and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 10.5 fb
. No excess above the standard model background is observed. Upper limits are set on the number of events from non-standard-model sources and are used to constrain a number of new physics models. Information on acceptance and efficiencies is also provided so that the
results can be used to confront an even broader class of new physics models.
.
Figure |
Abbreviated Caption |
|
Figure 1a : distribution of ET vs. HT for the 43 events in SR0; ee events: circles; eμ events: squares; μμ events: triangles; filled markers denote events with at least four jets; open markers denote events with at least 2, but less than 4 jets |
|
Figure 1b : projection of the scatter plot on the HT axis |
|
Figure 1c : projection of the scatter plot on the MET axis |
|
Figure 1d : distribution of leading lepton pt of observed events and estimated backgrounds |
|
Figure 1e : distribution of the trailing lepton pt of observed events and estimated backgrounds |
|
Figure 1f : distribution of number of jets of observed events and estimated backgrounds |
|
Figure 1g : distribution of the number of b-tagged jets of observed events and estimated backgrounds |
|
Figure 2a : Lepton selection efficiency (calculated using Model A1) |
|
Figure 2b : b-tagging efficiency |
|
Figure 5a : Diagram for A1 model |
|
Figure 5b : Diagram for A2 model |
|
Figure 6a : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(χ0 ) − m( g) plane for model A1 (gluino decay via virtual stop quarks). The band represents the theoretical uncertainty on the gluino pair production cross-section. |
|
Figure 6b : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(t1 ) − m( g) plane for model A2 (gluino decay to on-shell top squarks) for a LSP mass of 50 GeV |
|
Figure 6c : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(t1 ) − m( g) plane for model A2 (gluino decay to on-shell top squarks) for a LSP mass of 250 GeV |
|
Figure 7a : Diagram for B1 model |
|
Figure 7b : Diagram for B2 model |
|
Figure 8a : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(χ− ) − m(b1 ) plane for model B1 (sbottom pair production) |
|
Figure 8b : exclusion (95% C.L.) in the m(b1 ) − m( g) plane for model B2 for a chargino mass of 150 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV |
|
Figure 8c : exclusion (95% C.L.) in the m(b1 ) − m( g) plane for model B2 for a chargino mass of 300 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV |
|
Additional Figure : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(t1 ) − m( g) plane for model Aq (gluino decay via virtual stop quarks), alternate presentation |
|
Additional Figure : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(t1 ) − m( g) plane for model A2 (gluino decay to on-shell top squarks), alternate presentation |
|
Additional Figure : exclusion (95 % C.L.) in the m(χ− ) − m(b1 ) plane for model B1 (sbottom pair production), alternate presentation |
|
Additional Figure : exclusion (95% C.L.) in the m(b1 ) − m( g) plane for model B2, alternate presentation |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 electron Tight-to-Loose ratio projected in lepton pT for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 electron Tight-to-Loose ratio projected in lepton eta for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 electron Tight-to-Loose ratio binned in number of vertices for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 muon Tight-to-Loose ratio projected in lepton pT for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 muon Tight-to-Loose ratio projected in lepton eta for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure : Method 1 muon Tight-to-Loose ratio binned in number of vertices for different requirements on the PT of the away jet |
|
Additional Figure: Observed events and predicted background for each channel in a control region, defined with HT>200 GeV, MET> 200 GeV and nBjet>=0. |
|
Additional Figure: HT distribution of the observed events and estimated backgrounds in the control region. |
|
Additional Figure: MET distribution of the observed events and estimated backgrounds in the control region. |
|
Additional Figure: distribution of the number of b-tagged jets of observed events and estimated backgrounds in the control region. |
|
Additional Figure: pT distribution of the leading lepton for observed data and predicted background for the control region. |
|
Additional Figure: Relative isolation distribution as measured in the QCD control region for Method 2 used to estimate the background from jets mis-identified as muons. |
|
Additional Figure: Relative isolation distribution as measured in the QCD control region for Method 2 used to estimate the background from jets mis-identified as electrons. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model A1. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model A2 with a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model A2 with a LSP mass of 250 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model B2 with a chargino mass of 150 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model B2 with a chargino mass of 300 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Signal region giving the best expected limit for Model B1. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model A1. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model A2 with a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model A2 with a LSP mass of 250 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model B2 with a chargino mass of 150 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model B2 with a chargino mass of 300 GeV and a LSP mass of 50 GeV. |
|
Additional Figure: Acceptance for Model B1. |