PLEASE WAIT A FEW SECONDS TO ALLOW THE PAGE TO LOAD PROPERLY BEFORE VIEWING THE MATERIAL BELOW

Searches for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons decaying to leptons and W, Z, and Higgs bosons in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV

Contents:

Abstract

Searches for the direct electroweak production of supersymmetric charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons in a variety of signatures with leptons and W, Z, and Higgs bosons are presented. Results are based on a sample of proton-proton collision data collected at center-of-mass energy √s = 8 TeV with the CMS detector in 2012, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.5fb-1. The observed event rates are in agreement with expectations from the standard model. These results probe charginos and neutralinos with masses up to 720 GeV, and sleptons up to 280 GeV, depending on the model details.

Detailed documentation can be found at SUS-13-006.

This paper is submitted to EPJC arXiv:1405.7570. It merges the results from CMS-PAS-SUS-13-006 and CMS-PAS-SUS-13-017 together.

Approved tables and plots ( click on plot to get .pdf )

Tables and Plots from the Paper

Section 1) Introduction

Figures Caption
Figure 1: (left) Chargino-neutralino pair production with decays mediated by sleptons and sneutrinos, leading to a three-lepton final state with missing transverse energy $E_{T}^{miss}$.
Figure 1: (right) Chargino-neutralino pair production with decays mediated by sleptons, leading to a three-lepton final state with missing transverse energy $E_{T}^{miss}$.
Figure 2: (left) Chargino-neutralino production, with the chargino decaying to a W boson and the LSP and with the neutralino decaying to a Z boson and the LSP, leading to the WZ+ $E_{T}^{miss}$ final state.
Figure 2: (middle) Chargino-neutralino production, with the chargino decaying to a W boson and the LSP and with the neutralino decaying to a Higgs boson and the LSP, leading to the WH+ $E_{T}^{miss}$ final state.
Figure 2: (right) A GMSB model with higgsino pair production, with $\tilde{\chi}_{j}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{i}$ indicating charginos or neutralinos, leading to the ZZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state.
Figure 3: (left) Chargino pair production leading to opposite-sign lepton pairs with with $E_{T}^{miss}$.
Figure 3: (right) Slepton pair production leading to opposite-sign lepton pairs with $E_{T}^{miss}$.

Section 3) Search in the three-lepton final state

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 4: $M_{T}$ versus $M_{\ell\ell}$ for three-lepton events in data with an $ee$ or μμ OSSF dilepton pair, where the third lepton is either an electron or a muon. Events outside of the plotted range are not indicated.
Figure 5: $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions, in bins of $M_{T}$ and $M_{\ell\ell}$, for three-lepton events with an $ee$ or μμ OSSF dilepton pair, where the third lepton is either an electron or a muon. The SM expectations are also shown. The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for example signal scenarios are overlaid. The first (second) number in parentheses indicates the value of $m_\tilde{\chi}$ ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$).
Table 1: Observed yields and SM expectations for three-lepton events with an $ee$ or μμ OSSFpair, where the third lepton is either an electron or muon. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components.

Figure 20: Distribution of $M_{T}$ versus $M_{\ell\ell}$ for three-lepton $ee$μ and $e$μμ events without an OSSF pair. $M_{\ell\ell}$ is calculated by combining opposite-sign leptons and choosing the pair closest to the corresponding dilepton mass determined from Z→$\tau\tau$ simulation. $M_{T}$ is calculated using the remaining lepton.
Figure 21: The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for three-lepton $ee$μ and $e$μμ events without an OSSF pair. The SM expectations are also shown. The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for an example signal scenario is overlaid. The first (second) number in parentheses indicates the value of $m_\tilde{\chi}$ ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$
Table 11: Observed yields and SM expectations for three-lepton $ee$μ and $e$μμ events without an OSSF pair. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components.

Figure 22: Distribution of $M_{T}$ versus $M_{\ell\ell}$ for three-lepton events with a same-sign $ee$, $e$μ, or μμ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. $M_{\ell\ell}$ is calculated by combining opposite-sign leptons and choosing the pair closest to the corresponding dilepton mass determined from Z→$\tau\tau$ simulation. $M_{T}$ is calculated using the remaining lepton.
Figure 23: The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for three-lepton events with a same-sign $ee$, $e$μ, or μμ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. The SM expectations are also shown. The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for an example signal scenario is overlaid. The first (second) number in parentheses indicates the value of $m_\tilde{\chi}$ ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$
Table 12: Observed yields and SM expectations for events with a same-sign $ee$, $e$μ, or μμ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components.

Figure 24: Distribution of $M_{T}$ versus $M_{\ell\ell}$ for three-lepton events with an opposite-sign $e$μ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. $M_{\ell\ell}$ is calculated by combining opposite-sign leptons and choosing the pair closest to the corresponding dilepton mass determined from Z →$\tau\tau$ simulation. $M_{T}$ is calculated using the remaining lepton.
Figure 25: The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for three-lepton events with an opposite-sign $e$μ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. The SM expectations are also shown. The $E_{T}^{miss}$ distributions for an example signal scenario is overlaid. The first (second) number in parentheses indicates the value of $m_\tilde{\chi}$ ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$.
Table 13: Observed yields and SM expectations for events with an opposite-sign $e$μ pair and one $\tau_{h}$. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components.

Section 4) Search in the four-lepton final state

Tables and Figures Caption
Table 2: Observed yields and SM expectations for exclusive channels of four-lepton final states. All categories require four leptons including an OSSF ($ee$ or $μ$μ) pair consistent with a Z boson. The three sections refer, respectively, to events with one OSSF pair and no $\tau_{h}$ candidate, one OSSF pair and one $\tau_{h}$ candidate, and two OSSF pairs and no $\tau_{h}$ candidate. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components
Figure 26: $E_{T}^{miss}$ versus $M_{\ell\ell}$ for four-lepton events with an on-Z OSSF pair and no $\tau_{h}$. The legend indicates the flavor breakdown of events. For events with two OSSF pairs, we choose the pair with mass closest to the Z boson mass.

Section 5) Search in the same-sign two-lepton final state

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 6: (left) $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution for same-sign dilepton candidates in comparison with the SM expectations. The bottom panel shows the ratio and corresponding uncertainty of the observed and total SM expected distributions. The third lepton veto is not applied. The distributions of example signal scenarios are overlaid.
Figure 6: (right) Observed yields and expected backgrounds for the different search regions. In both plots, events with $E_{T}^{miss}$>120GeV are displayed, and the hashed band shows the combined statistical and systematic uncertainties of the total background.
Table 3: Observed yields and SM expectations for the same-sign dilepton search, with and without a veto on the presence of a third lepton. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The $N_{jets}$ variable refers to the number of jets with $p_{T}$> 40 GeV and \ $\eta$\ <2.5

Section 6) Search in the WZ/ZZ +$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state with two leptons and two jets

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 7: (left) Distributions for Z+dijet events in comparison with SM expectations: $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution for events with the dilepton invariant mass satisfying 81< $M_{\ell\ell}$<101 GeV; expected results for two signal scenarios are overlaid. The ratio of the observed to predicted yields in each bin is shown in the lower panels. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties of the data and the shaded band the total background uncertainty.
Figure 7: (right) Distributions for Z+dijet events in comparison with SM expectations: $M_{\ell\ell}$ distribution for $E_{T}^{miss}$ >80 GeV. The ratio of the observed to predicted yields in each bin is shown in the lower panels. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties of the data and the shaded band the total background uncertainty.
Table 4: Observed yields and SM expectations, in bins of $E_{T}^{miss}$, for the Z+dijet analysis. The total background is the sum of the Z+jets background, the flavor-symmetric (FS) background, and the WZ, ZZ, and rare SM backgrounds. All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The expected yields for the WZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$ model with $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 300 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 0 GeV, and the GMSB ZZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$ model with $\mu$=320 GeV are also indicated

Section 7) Search in the WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 8: (top left) Distribution of $M_{b\bar{b}}$ for the single-lepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis for $E_{T}^{miss}$ >100 GeV, after all signal region requirements have been applied except for that on $M_{b\bar{b}}$. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The labels "2ℓ top'' and "1ℓ top'' refer to the dilepton top-quark and single-lepton top-quark backgrounds, respectively. The band indicates the total uncertainty of the background prediction. Results from an example signal scenario are shown, stacked on top of the SM background.
Figure 8: (top right) Distribution of $M_{b\bar{b}}$ for the single-lepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis for $E_{T}^{miss}$ >125 GeV, after all signal region requirements have been applied except for that on $M_{b\bar{b}}$. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The labels "2ℓ top'' and "1ℓ top'' refer to the dilepton top-quark and single-lepton top-quark backgrounds, respectively. The band indicates the total uncertainty of the background prediction. Results from an example signal scenario are shown, stacked on top of the SM background.
Figure 8: (bottom left) Distribution of $M_{b\bar{b}}$ for the single-lepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis for $E_{T}^{miss}$ >150 GeV, after all signal region requirements have been applied except for that on $M_{b\bar{b}}$. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The labels "2ℓ top'' and "1ℓ top'' refer to the dilepton top-quark and single-lepton top-quark backgrounds, respectively. The band indicates the total uncertainty of the background prediction. Results from an example signal scenario are shown, stacked on top of the SM background.
Figure 8: (bottom right) Distribution of $M_{b\bar{b}}$ for the single-lepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis for $E_{T}^{miss}$ >175 GeV, after all signal region requirements have been applied except for that on $M_{b\bar{b}}$. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The labels "2ℓ top'' and "1ℓ top'' refer to the dilepton top-quark and single-lepton top-quark backgrounds, respectively. The band indicates the total uncertainty of the background prediction. Results from an example signal scenario are shown, stacked on top of the SM background.
Figure 9: $M_{\ell jj}$ distribution for the same-sign dilepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis, compared to the expected backgrounds, after all selection requirements have been applied except for that on \mljj. An example signal scenario with $m_\tilde{\chi}$=130 GeV and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$=1 GeV is overlaid. For better visibility, the signal normalization has been increased by a factor of five relative to the theory prediction.
Table 5: Observed yields and SM expectations, in several bins of $E_{T}^{miss}$, for the single-lepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis. The expectations from several signal scenarios are shown; the first number indicates $m_\tilde{\chi}$ and the second $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ (GeV). The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components
Table 6: Observed yields and SM expectations for the same-sign dilepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis. The expectations from several signal scenarios are shown; the first number indicates $m_\tilde{\chi}$ and the second $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ (GeV). The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components
Table 7: Observed yields and SM expectations for the multilepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ search for the five signal regions with best sensitivity for the $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 130 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1GeV scenario. All five signal regions require exactly three leptons, no $\tau_{h}$ candidate, no tagged b jet, and $H_{T}$ < 200 GeV. The “Below Z” entries indicate the requirement of an OSSF lepton pair with $M_{\ell\ell}$ < 75 GeV
Table 14: Multilepton results for the $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 150 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1GeV scenario. See Table 7 for details
Table 15: Multilepton results for the $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 200 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1GeV scenario. See Table 7 for details
Table 16: Multilepton results for the $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 300 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1GeV scenario. See Table 7 for details
Table 17: Multilepton results for the $m_\tilde{\chi}$ = 400 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1GeV scenario. See Table 7 for details

Section 8) Searches in the final state with non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton pair

Tables and Figures Caption
Table 8: Results from a maximum likelihood fit of the background-only hypothesis to the $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution in data for $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ > 10 GeV for the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis. The corresponding results from simulation are also shown
Figure 10: $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution for the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis compared to the background prediction for the opposite-flavor channels. The background prediction is based on a fit of templates derived from control samples or simulation. The signal distributions with two different chargino mass values for the SUSY scenario shown in Fig. 1(left) are also shown, with the LSP mass set to zero. The ratio of the data to the fitted distribution is shown in the lower panels.
Figure 10: $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution for the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis compared to the background prediction for the same-flavor channels. The background prediction is based on a fit of templates derived from control samples or simulation. The signal distributions with two different chargino mass values for the SUSY scenario shown in Fig. 1(left) are also shown, with the LSP mass set to zero. The ratio of the data to the fitted distribution is shown in the lower panels.
Figure 11 $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution compared to the background prediction for the same-flavor channel of the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis, where the background prediction is derived from an alternative template method that uses opposite-flavor dilepton events as a control sample (see text). The signal distributions with two different slepton mass values for the SUSY scenario shown in Fig. 3(right) are also shown, with the LSP mass set to zero. The ratio of the data to the fitted distribution is shown in the lower panel.
Table 9: Results from a maximum likelihood fit of the background-only hypothesis to the $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution in data, performed for events with 10 < $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ < 120 GeV and extrapolated to the $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ > 120 GeV region, for the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis. Where the predicted value is zero, the one standard deviation upper limit is given.
Table 10: Results from a maximum likelihood fit of the background-only hypothesis to the $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ distribution of the same-flavor channel with $M_{\mathrm{CT}\perp}$ > 10 GeV, for the non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton analysis, where the background prediction is derived from an alternative template method that uses opposite-flavor dilepton events as a control sample (see text). For comparison, the SM expected yields based on simulation are also indicated.

Section 9) Interpretations of the searches

9.1) Limits on chargino-neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 12: Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search in the flavor-democratic signal model with slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.5. The shading in the $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ versus $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ (=$m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$) plane indicates the 95% CL upper limit on the chargino-neutralino production cross section times branching fraction. The contours bound the mass regions excluded at 95% CL assuming the NLO+NLL cross sections for a branching fraction of 50%, as appropriate for the visible decay products in this scenario. The observed, $\pm 1 \sigma_\mathrm{theory}$ observed, median expected, and $\pm 1 \sigma_\mathrm{experiment}$ expected bounds are shown.
Figure 13: (left) Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search, the same-sign dilepton search, and their combination, in the flavor-democratic signal model with the slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.05. The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 13: (right) Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search, the same-sign dilepton search, and their combination, in the flavor-democratic signal model with the slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.95. The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 14: (top left) Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search, the same-sign dilepton search, and their combination for the τ-enriched signal model with the slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.05 The shading indicates the 95 % CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 14: (top right) Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search for the τ-enriched signal model with the slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.5 The shading indicates the 95 % CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 14: (bottom) Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search, the same-sign dilepton search, and their combination for the τ-enriched signal model with the slepton mass parameter $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$=0.95 The shading indicates the 95 % CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 15: Interpretation of the results of the three-lepton search in the τ-dominated signal model. The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.

9.2) Limits on chargino-neutralino production without light sleptons

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 16: (left) Interpretation of the results of the Z+dijet search, the three-lepton search, and their combination, in the WZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$ model. The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure : (right) Interpretation of the combined results of the single-lepton, same-sign dilepton, and multilepton channels, in the WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ model. The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 27: (upper left) The interpretation of the results from the single-lepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times B($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ → WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$). The green band shows the one-standard-deviation variation of the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty of the cross section calculation.
Figure 27: (upper right) The interpretation of the results from the same-sign dilepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times B($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ → WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$). The green band shows the one-standard-deviation variation of the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty of the cross section calculation.
Figure 27: (lower left) The interpretation of the results from the multilepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times B($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ → WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$). The green band shows the one-standard-deviation variation of the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty of the cross section calculation.
Figure 27: (lower right) The interpretation of the results from the combination of the single-lepton search, the same-sign dilepton search, and the multilepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times B($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ → WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$). The green band shows the one-standard-deviation variation of the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty of the cross section calculation.

9.3) Limits on a Z-boson enriched GMSB model

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 17: Interpretation of the results of the Z+dijet search, the three- and four-lepton searches, and their combination, in the GMSB scenario discussed in the text. The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section are indicated as a function of the higgsino mass parameter μ, and are compared to the theoretical cross section.

9.4) Limits on chargino and slepton pair production

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 18: (upper left)Interpretation of the results of the opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton search, in the models with chargino pair production($\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}$). The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections.
Figure 18: (upper right) Interpretation of the results of the opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton search, in the models with left-handed slepton pair production ($\ell_{L}\ell_{L}$). The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections
Figure 18: (bottom) Interpretation of the results of the opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton search, in the models with right-handed slepton pair production ($\ell_{R}\ell_{R}$). The shading indicates the 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times branching fraction, and the contours the excluded regions assuming the NLO+NLL signal cross sections

Section 10) Summary

Tables and Figures Caption
Figure 19: (left) Contours bounding the mass regions excluded at 95\% CL for chargino-neutralino production with decays to left-handed sleptons, right-handed sleptons, or direct decays to Higgs and vector bosons, and for chargino-pair production, based on NLO+NLL signal cross sections. Where applicable, the $x_{\tilde{\ell}}$ value used to calculate the slepton mass is 0.5.
Figure 19: (right) Expanded view for chargino-neutralino production with decays to Higgs and vector bosons

Additional Material, Electronic version of interpretations and acceptance maps

Information for model testing: cutflow tables for individual searches in representative points

WH+MET search with a single lepton and two b jets

Tables Caption
Number of signal events remaining after each stage of the event selection for the WH search with $H\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$, with chargino mass values of 130 and 200 GeV and an LSP mass of 1 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical. The baseline selection accounts for the primary vertex criteria and for quality requirements applied to the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution.

WH+MET search with two same-sign leptons

Tables Caption
Number of signal events remaining after each stage of the event selection for the WH search with $H\rightarrow WW$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$, with a chargino mass of 130 GeV and an LSP mass of 1 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.

WZ+MET search with three light leptons

Tables Caption
Number of signal events in each search region for the WZ+MET search with three light leptons containing an opposite-sign same-flavor pair, with a chargino mass of 150 GeV and an LSP mass of 60 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.
Number of signal events in each search region for the WZ+MET search with three light leptons containing an opposite-sign same-flavor pair, with a chargino mass of 200 GeV and an LSP mass of 20 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.
Number of signal events for the WZ+MET search with three light leptons containing an opposite-sign same-flavor pair. The efficiencies are shown after requiring 3 light leptons, applying a b-jet veto and $M_{\ell\ell} > 12 {\rm GeV}$. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.

3$\tau$+MET search with two same sign light leptons and a hadronically decaying tau

Tables Caption
Number of signal events for the tau-dominated scenario of chargino-neutralino production in each search region for the search with two same sign light leptons and a hadronically decaying tau, with a chargino mass of 300 GeV and an LSP mass of 20 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.
Number of signal events for the tau-dominated scenario of chargino-neutralino production in each search region for the search with two same sign light leptons and a hadronically decaying tau, with a chargino mass of 300 GeV and an LSP mass of 100 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.
Number of signal events for the search with two same sign light leptons and a hadronically decaying tau. The efficiencies are shown after requiring 2 same-sign light leptons and a hadronically decaying tau, applying a b-jet veto and $M_{\ell\ell} > 12 {\rm GeV}$. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.

$\ell\ell\tau+MET$ search with two same sign leptons

Tables Caption
Number of signal events for the tau-enriched scenario with x=0.05 remaining after each stage of the event selection for the SS search, for two mass points with a chargino mass of 300 GeV and a LSP mass of 20 and 220 GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical.

WZ+MET and ZZ+MET search with a Z-candidate and 2 jets

Tables Caption
Number of signal events remaining after each stage of the event selection for the Z+dijet+$E_{T}^{miss}$ search with $Z\rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ and $W\rightarrow jj$, with a chargino mass values of 300 GeV and a massless LSP. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical. The "All Events" entry includes generated events with the decays $Z\rightarrow ee,\mu\mu,\tau\tau$.
Number of signal events remaining after each stage of the event selection for the Z+dijet+$E_{T}^{miss}$ search with $Z\rightarrow \ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ and $Z\rightarrow jj$, in the GMSB scenario with the higgsino mass parameter $\mu = 320$ GeV. The results are normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.5 fb-1 using NLO+NLL calculations. The uncertainties are statistical. The "All Events" entry includes generated events with at least one Z boson decaying via $Z\rightarrow ee,\mu\mu,\tau\tau$.

Search in the three-lepton final state

Numbering scheme for analysis channels

Channel Specification Channel Number
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR1
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR2
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR3
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR4
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR5
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR6
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR7
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR8
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR9
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR10
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR11
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR12
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR13
3L_OSSF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR14
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR15
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR16
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR17
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR18
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR19
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR20
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR21
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR22
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR23
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR24
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR25
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR26
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR27
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR28
3L_OSSF_inZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR29
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR30
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR31
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR32
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR33
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR34
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR35
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR36
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR37
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR38
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR39
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR40
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR41
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR42
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR43
3L_OSSF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR44
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR45
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR46
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR47
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR48
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR49
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR50
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR51
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR52
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR53
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR54
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR55
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR56
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR57
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR58
3L_OSOF_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR59
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR75
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR76
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR77
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR78
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR79
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR80
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR81
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR82
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR83
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR84
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR85
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR86
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR87
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR88
3L_OSOF_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR89
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR90
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR91
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR92
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR93
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR94
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR95
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR96
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR97
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR98
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR99
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR100
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR101
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR102
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR103
3L_SS1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR104
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR120
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR121
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR122
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR123
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR124
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR125
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR126
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR127
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR128
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR129
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR130
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR131
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR132
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR133
3L_SS1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR134
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR135
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR136
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR137
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR138
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR139
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR140
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR141
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR142
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR143
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR144
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR145
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR146
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR147
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR148
3L_OSOF1tau_belowZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR149
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:0-50 SR165
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:50-100 SR166
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:100-150 SR167
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:150-200 SR168
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:0-120_MET:200-inf SR169
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:0-50 SR170
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:50-100 SR171
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:100-150 SR172
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:150-200 SR173
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:120-160_MET:200-inf SR174
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:0-50 SR175
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:50-100 SR176
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:100-150 SR177
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:150-200 SR178
3L_OSOF1tau_aboveZ_MT:160-inf_MET:200-inf SR179
SS_HT0MET200lV SR181
SS_HT0MET120NJ2bVlV SR182
2L2J_MET:80-100 SR500
2L2J_MET:100-120 SR501
2L2J_MET:120-150 SR502
2L2J_MET:150-200 SR503
2L2J_MET:200-inf SR504

The root files contain the efficiencies for the signal regions used in the limits for the given model.

Model Specification Analysis Link to the file
Chargino-Neutralino Production Flavor-democratic, x=0.5, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons 3l Flavor-democratic x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino Production Flavor-democratic, x=0.05, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons 3l Flavor-democratic x=0.05
Chargino-Neutralino Production Flavor-democratic, x=0.95, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons 3l Flavor-democratic x=0.95
Chargino-Neutralino Production Tau-enriched, x=0.5, no penalty 3l Tau-enriched x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino Production Tau-enriched, x=0.05, no penalty 3l Tau-enriched x=0.05
Chargino-Neutralino Production Tau-enriched, x=0.95, no penalty 3l Tau-enriched x=0.95
Chargino-Neutralino Production Tau-dominated, x=0.5, no penalty 3l Tau-dominated x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino Production WZ, need to add 10.1% penalty for Z BF 3l Intermediate WZ

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
Additional Figure: Response (left) and resolution (right) for u1 (top) and u2 (bottom) in Drell-Yan and WZ simulation.
Additional Figure: Left: $E_{\rm T}^{\rm miss}$ spectrum for internal and external conversions in data. The curves have been normalized to the event yields in the smallest sample (the internal conversions) to allow a better shape comparison. Right: Rayleigh-fit to the data $E_{\rm T}^{\rm miss}$ spectrum for di-lepton mass outside the Z mass window and tri-lepton mass inside the Z mass window, this sample is highly enriched in ${\rm Z}\gamma(^{*})$.
  Additional Figure: Tight-to-Loose ratio of tau lepton measured in CS. It is used in SS+tau channel.
Additional Figure: $M_{\rm T}$ distribution for three-lepton events with an ${\rm ee}$ or $\mu\mu$ OSSF dilepton pair, where the third lepton is either an electron or a muon.
 
Additional Figure: $M_{\rm T}$ distribution for three-lepton events without an ${\rm ee}$ or $\mu\mu$ OSSF dilepton pair.
Additional Figure: Performance of the non-prompt lepton background estimation method in simulation.

Search in the four-lepton final state

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
Additional Figure: Efficiency ratio vs Rdxy ("b-ness of events") for muons and electrons.
Additional Figure: ft-fsb for taus with Pt between 40 and 60 GeV (ft is the fake-rate for taus and fsb is inversely proportional to jet activity)
Additional Figure: ft-fsb for taus with Pt between 20 and 40 GeV (ft is the fake-rate for taus and fsb is inversely proportional to jet activity)
Additional Figure: 3-muon invariant mass showing asymmetric internal conversion.

Search in the same-sign two-lepton final state

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
Additional Figure: $E_{\rm T}^{\rm miss}$% versus $H_{\rm T}$ for same-sign dilepton candidate events. Only the $E_{\rm T}^{\rm miss} &amp;gt; 120~{\rm GeV}$ region is considered in this analysis.
Table : (Same as Table 3) Observed yields and SM expectations for the same-sign dilepton search, with and without a veto on the presence of a third lepton. The uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components.
Additional Figure: Charge miss-identification probability for electrons as a function of the electron pt.
Additional Figure: Fake ratios for electrons vs pT and eta.
Additional Figure: Fake ratios for electrons vs pT and eta.
Additional Figure: Prompt ratios for electrons and muons vs pT.
Additional Figure: MET distribution in a WZ-enriched sample, differences between data-MC are taken as syst. error for WZ background prediction.
Additional Figure: Observed and predicted background Njets and Nbjets distribution for the events passing the baseline selection.
Table: Expected and observed yields in the baseline region showing different channel separately. .

Search in the WZ/ZZ +$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state with two leptons and two jets

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
Additional Figure: The observed MET distribution compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds in the dijet mass Mjj > 110 GeV control region.
Table: Summary of observed yields compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds in the dijet mass Mjj > 110 GeV control region.
Additional Figure: Data vs. MC comparison of the dilepton mass after an inclusive dilepton selection.
Table: Comparison of data vs. MC yields in the Z mass window after an inclusive dilepton selection.
Additional Figure: Data vs. MC comparison of the dilepton mass after the preselection of the Z(ll)V(jj) search.
Table: Comparison of data vs. MC yields in the Z mass window after the preselection of the Z(ll)V(jj) search.
Additional Figure: Validation of the WZ MC in a 3l control region.
Additional Figure: Validation of the ZZ MC in a 4l control region.
Additional Figure: Data vs. MC comparison of the dijet mass after the preselection of the Z(ll)V(jj) search.

Search in the WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state

Search in the single-lepton final state

The attached root file has 2d maps of signal efficiency (in percent) for each of the analysis signal regions, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → bb.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure: Dijet mass in CR-2l after preselection.
Additional Figure: ETmiss in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: MT in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: MT2bl in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: Dijet mass in CR-0b after preselection.
Additional Figure: ETmiss in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: MT in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: MT2bl in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-2l after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and either the MT or MT2bl cut. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 1.0 +/- 0.4 on the dilepton top background, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-Mbb after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and the MT2bl cut. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 0.75 +/- 0.25 for the efficiency of the single lepton backgrounds to pass the MT2bl cut, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-0b after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and the MT2bl and MT cuts. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 1.1 +/- 0.1 for the efficiency of the W+jets backgrounds to pass the MT cut, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-Mbb after all cuts except ETmiss and with all scale factors applied. This plot is used to validate the total background prediction. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure: Dijet mass after analysis preselection. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 20.
Additional Figure: ETmiss after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure: MT after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure: MT2bl after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure: Selected best signal region for each mass point, based on the expected cross-section limits.
Additional Figure: Estimated 5$\sigma$ discovery reach in 300 fb$^{-1}$ 14 TeV data, in the plane of the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ mass vs. the common mass of the $\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}$ particles. The signal and background yields for the tightest signal region ($E_{T}^{miss} > 175$ GeV) of the single lepton analysis are extrapolated based on the increased production cross section and the factor of 15 increase in the integrated luminosity. In scenario A, the same systematic uncertainty on the background prediction as in the 8 TeV analysis (25%) is assumed; in scenario B this systematic uncertainty is reduced by a factor of 2.

Search in the same-sign dilepton final state

The attached root file has a 2d map of signal efficiency (in percent) for the single signal region of the same-sign analysis, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → WW.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure: Max $M_{T}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure: ETmiss after preselection.
Additional Figure : $M_{ljj}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure: $M_{T2}^{j}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure: Number of CSVL b-tagged jets after preselection.
Additional Figure: Number of CSVT b-tagged jets after preselection.
Additional Figure: p$_{T}$ of the highest p$_{T}$ lepton after preselection.
Additional Figure: p$_{T}$ of the lowest p$_{T}$ lepton after preselection.
Additional Figure: p$_{T}$ of the third lepton, if present, after preselection.
Additional Figure: $\Delta \eta$ between leptons after preselection.
Additional Figure: Total yield after preselection, including a breakdown by flavor.
Additional Figure: Background and data yields after preselection.
Additional Figure: Electron fake rate as a function of $\eta$.
Additional Figure: Electron fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$.
Additional Figure 16: Electron fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$, with and without the electroweak correction.
Additional Figure: Muon fake rate as a function of $\eta$.
Additional Figure: Muon fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$.
Additional Figure: Muon fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$, with and without the electroweak correction.

Search in the multilepton final state

The attached files efficiencies_multilepton_HtoWW.txt, efficiencies_multilepton_HtoTauTau.txt, and efficiencies_multilepton_HtoZZ.txt contain the signal efficiency for the top 5 analysis signal regions at the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → WW, H → $\tau\tau$, H → ZZ respectively.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → WW*.
Additional Figure: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → ZZ*.
Additional Figure: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → τ τ.
Additional Figure: A comparison of data and simulation for the ETmiss distribution for events with an opposite-sign electron-muon pair, a dataset dominated by ttbar production, shown in absolute yields.
Additional Figure: A comparison of data and simulation for the HT distribution for events with an opposite-sign electron-muon pair, a dataset dominated by ttbar production, shown in absolute yields.
Additional Figure: Isolation distribution used for data-driven background estimation.
Additional Figure: ETmiss distribution in WZ control region (3-leptons including 1 on-Z OSSF pair, HT < 200 GeV, and Transverse mass between 50 and 100 GeV)
Additional Figure: The transverse mass distribution of events in a data sample enriched in WZ requiring an OSSF pair with invariant mass in the Z-window and 50 GeV < ETmiss < 100 GeV (Linear Scale).
Additional Figure: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons (no OSSF pair or hadronic taus), no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons (no OSSF pair) including 1 hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons including 1 OSSF pair above Z, no hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons including 1 OSSF pair below Z, no hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.

Searches in the final state with non-resonant opposite-sign dilepton-pair

These files contain the signal efficiencies in the MCTPerp > 120 GeV region for the cut-based analysis. The CSV files have a header row describing the fields. "mass1" refers to the pair-produced particle and "mass2" refers to the LSP. The uncertainty on the acceptance is purely statistical. No systematics are included.

Model Specification Analysis Link to the file
Chargino-Chargino Production Decay via sleptons and sneutrinos OS MCT Chargino-Chargino
Slepton-Slepton Production Only smuons and selectrons OS MCT Slepton-Slepton

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
Additional Figure : Schematic event used to illustrate the calculation of the $M_{\rm CT}$ and $M_{{\rm CT}\perp}$ variables. P represents a "parent" particle and C an undetected "child" particle; $v_{\rm a}$ and $v_{\rm b}$ are visible particles.
Equation 3: The $M_{\rm CT}$ variable definition.
Equation 4: An upper endpoint of the $M_{\rm CT}$ distribution.
Equation 5: An upper endpoint of the $M_{{\rm CT}\perp}$ distribution.
Additional Figure: Simulated distribution of the MCTPerp distributions of Standard Model backgrounds and two signal models. The left plots shows the opposite-flavor channel, while the right shows the same-flavor.
Additional Figure: Comparison of the MCT⊥ shapes of the top control region versus the true top shapes in Monte Carlo simulation in events where the two leptons are of the opposite (a) and same (b) flavor. The Monte Carlo truth histograms from different processes are stacked and their sum normalized to one.
Additional Figure: Comparison of data and Monte Carlo simulation with all preselection cuts applied. We require three leptons, two of which form an invariant mass consistent with a Z boson. In this region WZ background is dominant, and we see good agreement between data and simulation. A two-sample KS test comparing the data and the WZ simulation gives a p-value of 0.23.
Additional Figure: Comparison of data and Monte Carlo simulation with all preselection cuts applied, but the Z mass veto inverted in the same flavor channel. In the low MCT⊥ region, the Z/γ∗ background dominates. Discrepancies from this plot are used to assign a shape systematic to the Z template. In the high MCT⊥ region, the ZZ background dominates, and we see that the agreement is quite good. Y-axis scales are a) log and b) linear.
Additional Figure: Comparison of the MCT⊥ shapes of the non-prompt control region versus the true W+Jets and semileptonic tt shape in Monte Carlo simulation. The shaded region indicates the statistical uncertainty on the signal-region Monte Carlo, which, unlike in other regions, is non- negligible.
Additional Figure: Monte Carlo closure test of the flavor symmetric background template. The flavor symmetric histogram includes top, WW, and WZ backgrounds.

Interpretations of the searches

The root files contain TCanvas with corresponding plot

Model Specification Analysis Link to the file
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Flavor-democratic, x=0.5, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons three-lepton Flavor-democratic x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Flavor-democratic, x=0.05, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons three-lepton/same-sign two-lepton Flavor-democratic x=0.05
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Flavor-democratic, x=0.95, need to add 50% penalty in case of left-handed sleptons three-lepton/same-sign two-lepton Flavor-democratic x=0.95
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Tau-enriched, x=0.5, no penalty three-lepton Tau-enriched x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Tau-enriched, x=0.05, no penalty three-lepton/same-sign two-lepton Tau-enriched x=0.05
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Tau-enriched, x=0.95, no penalty three-lepton/same-sign two-lepton Tau-enriched x=0.95
Chargino-Neutralino production with slepton-mediated decays Tau-dominated, x=0.5, no penalty three-lepton Tau-dominated x=0.5
Chargino-Neutralino production without light sleptons Decay 100% into WZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state, need to add 10.1% penalty for Z BF Z+dijet/three-lepton WZ+$E_{T}^{miss}$
Chargino-Neutralino production without light sleptons Decay 100% into WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ final state single-lepton/same-sign dilepton/multilepton WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$
Chargino Pair Production Decay via sleptons and sneutrinos opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton Chargino-Chargino
Slepton Pair Production Only left smuons and selectrons opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton SleptonL-SleptonL
Slepton Pair Production Only right smuons and selectrons opposite-sign non-resonant dilepton SleptonR-SleptonR
GMSB   Z+dijet/three-lepton/four-lepton GMSB
Combined Plot     Summary Plot

Tables and Figures Abbreviated Caption
  Summary of quantitative mass limits in the various models.
  Additional Figure: Interpretation of the combined results. Results are the same as Fig 27 (lower right), except that here the ratio of cross section upper limit to theory prediction is displayed.
  Additional Figure: Summary of the interpretations for the combined results and the results from the three individual channels for the WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis. Cross section upper limits are compared to the theory prediction.
  Additional Figure: Summary of the interpretations for the combined results and the results from the three individual channels for the WH+$E_{T}^{miss}$ analysis. The ratio of cross section limit to theory prediction is displayed.
  Additional Figure: Summary plot of the observed excluded regions.
  Additional Figure: Alternate version of summary plot above. Summary plot of the observed and expected excluded regions.

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PDFpdf 3l_OSSF_WZ.pdf r1 manage 33.5 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_OSSF_WZ.png r1 manage 370.7 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_OSSF_WZ_150_60.pdf r1 manage 59.5 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_OSSF_WZ_150_60.png r1 manage 970.6 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_OSSF_WZ_200_20.pdf r1 manage 59.2 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_OSSF_WZ_200_20.png r1 manage 967.1 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_SStau_tauDom.pdf r1 manage 48.2 K 2014-08-18 - 11:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_SStau_tauDom.png r1 manage 364.3 K 2014-08-18 - 11:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_SStau_tauDom_300_100.pdf r1 manage 57.9 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_SStau_tauDom_300_100.png r1 manage 845.0 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_SStau_tauDom_300_20.pdf r1 manage 57.9 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_SStau_tauDom_300_20.png r1 manage 856.8 K 2014-08-18 - 11:50 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_mt_1.pdf r1 manage 16.7 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_mt_1.png r2 r1 manage 164.6 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_mt_2.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.2 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_mt_2.png r2 r1 manage 182.1 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_mt_3.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.9 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_mt_3.png r2 r1 manage 170.4 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_mt_4.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.5 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_mt_4.png r2 r1 manage 157.0 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf 3l_mt_5.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.6 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng 3l_mt_5.png r2 r1 manage 166.2 K 2014-06-19 - 10:59 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf ChMissID_Prob2_Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.2 K 2014-06-10 - 13:36 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng ChMissID_Prob2_Pt.png r2 r1 manage 84.3 K 2014-06-10 - 13:37 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf EWKino_exclusion_Combined_SUSY2013.pdf r2 r1 manage 22.6 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng EWKino_exclusion_Combined_SUSY2013.png r2 r1 manage 235.9 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf EWKino_exclusion_Combined_observed_SUSY2013.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.0 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng EWKino_exclusion_Combined_observed_SUSY2013.png r2 r1 manage 210.1 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf EffRatvsRdxy_leptons.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.3 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng EffRatvsRdxy_leptons.png r2 r1 manage 92.9 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf Eq3.pdf r1 manage 66.3 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Eq3.png r1 manage 30.5 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Eq4.pdf r1 manage 41.8 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Eq4.png r1 manage 25.8 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Eq5.pdf r1 manage 58.8 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Eq5.png r1 manage 36.4 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf FRatio_Electrons_Eta.pdf r2 r1 manage 71.4 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng FRatio_Electrons_Eta.png r2 r1 manage 71.4 K 2014-06-10 - 13:58 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf FRatio_Electrons_Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 75.6 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng FRatio_Electrons_Pt.png r2 r1 manage 75.6 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf FRatio_Muons_Eta.pdf r2 r1 manage 70.7 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng FRatio_Muons_Eta.png r2 r1 manage 70.7 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf FRatio_Muons_Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 75.3 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng FRatio_Muons_Pt.png r2 r1 manage 75.3 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf FTvsFSB_DiLepton_highPt.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng FTvsFSB_DiLepton_highPt.png r2 r1 manage 90.9 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf FTvsFSB_DiLepton_lowPt.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.3 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng FTvsFSB_DiLepton_lowPt.png r2 r1 manage 91.4 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf Fig10_OSDil_MCTDistribution_of.pdf r1 manage 365.8 K 2014-06-04 - 16:02 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig10_OSDil_MCTDistribution_of.png r1 manage 203.5 K 2014-06-04 - 16:02 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig10_OSDil_MCTDistribution_sf.pdf r1 manage 367.2 K 2014-06-04 - 16:02 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig10_OSDil_MCTDistribution_sf.png r1 manage 207.7 K 2014-06-04 - 16:02 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig11_OSDil_MCTDistribution_sf2.pdf r1 manage 298.6 K 2014-06-04 - 16:08 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig11_OSDil_MCTDistribution_sf2.png r1 manage 210.1 K 2014-06-04 - 16:08 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig12_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_5.pdf r1 manage 27.0 K 2014-06-04 - 16:40 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig12_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_5.png r1 manage 451.8 K 2014-06-04 - 16:40 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig13_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_05.pdf r1 manage 25.9 K 2014-06-04 - 16:50 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig13_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_05.png r1 manage 533.3 K 2014-06-04 - 16:50 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig13_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_95.pdf r1 manage 27.2 K 2014-06-04 - 16:50 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig13_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_95.png r1 manage 533.2 K 2014-06-04 - 16:50 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_05.pdf r1 manage 25.9 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_05.png r1 manage 447.2 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_5.pdf r1 manage 26.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_5.png r1 manage 442.6 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_95.pdf r1 manage 26.4 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig14_exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_95.png r1 manage 523.4 K 2014-06-04 - 17:09 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig16_exclusion_TChiStauSnu_0_5.pdf r1 manage 25.2 K 2014-06-04 - 17:12 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig16_exclusion_TChiStauSnu_0_5.png r1 manage 392.0 K 2014-06-04 - 17:12 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig16_exclusion_TChiWH.pdf r1 manage 22.0 K 2014-06-04 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig16_exclusion_TChiWH.png r1 manage 342.5 K 2014-06-04 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig16_exclusion_TChiWZ.pdf r1 manage 26.4 K 2014-06-04 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig16_exclusion_TChiWZ.png r1 manage 597.4 K 2014-06-04 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig17_exclusion_GMSB.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:48 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig17_exclusion_GMSB.png r1 manage 431.6 K 2014-06-04 - 17:48 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig18_exclusion_TChipmSlepSnu.pdf r1 manage 24.1 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig18_exclusion_TChipmSlepSnu.png r1 manage 384.1 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig18_exclusion_TSlepSlepL.pdf r1 manage 21.8 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig18_exclusion_TSlepSlepL.png r1 manage 328.1 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig18_exclusion_TSlepSlepR.pdf r1 manage 21.6 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig18_exclusion_TSlepSlepR.png r1 manage 290.1 K 2014-06-04 - 18:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig19_exclusion_Combined.pdf r1 manage 18.4 K 2014-06-04 - 18:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig19_exclusion_Combined.png r1 manage 444.3 K 2014-06-04 - 18:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig19_exclusion_Combined_wzwh.pdf r1 manage 16.3 K 2014-06-04 - 18:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig19_exclusion_Combined_wzwh.png r1 manage 379.3 K 2014-06-04 - 18:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig1_TChiNuSlep_slep.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2014-06-03 - 10:49 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig1_TChiNuSlep_slep.png r1 manage 69.6 K 2014-06-03 - 10:49 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig1_TChiNuSlep_snu.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2014-06-03 - 10:49 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig1_TChiNuSlep_snu.png r1 manage 69.5 K 2014-06-03 - 10:49 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig20_mt_Mll_noOSSF_scatter.pdf r1 manage 14.5 K 2014-06-03 - 17:08 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig20_mt_Mll_noOSSF_scatter.png r1 manage 169.9 K 2014-06-03 - 17:08 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig21_ossf0tau0.pdf r1 manage 112.5 K 2014-06-03 - 17:08 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig21_ossf0tau0.png r1 manage 505.5 K 2014-06-03 - 17:08 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig22_mt_Mll_SStau_scatter.pdf r1 manage 15.3 K 2014-06-03 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig22_mt_Mll_SStau_scatter.png r1 manage 187.5 K 2014-06-03 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig23_ossf0tau1.pdf r1 manage 112.3 K 2014-06-03 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig23_ossf0tau1.png r1 manage 482.7 K 2014-06-03 - 17:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig24_mt_Mll_OSemutau_scatter.pdf r1 manage 17.8 K 2014-06-03 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig24_mt_Mll_OSemutau_scatter.png r1 manage 174.1 K 2014-06-03 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig25_ossf0tau1_C2.pdf r1 manage 112.6 K 2014-06-03 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig25_ossf0tau1_C2.png r1 manage 564.4 K 2014-06-03 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig26_fourLeptons_METvsMll.pdf r1 manage 9.3 K 2014-06-03 - 18:13 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig26_fourLeptons_METvsMll.png r1 manage 192.5 K 2014-06-03 - 18:13 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig27_exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig27_exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG.png r1 manage 324.9 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig27_exclusion_Wino_DOW.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig27_exclusion_Wino_DOW.png r1 manage 328.6 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig27_exclusion_Wino_JG.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig27_exclusion_Wino_JG.png r1 manage 304.7 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig27_exclusion_Wino_RG.pdf r1 manage 16.1 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig27_exclusion_Wino_RG.png r1 manage 310.5 K 2014-06-04 - 17:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig2_TChiWH.pdf r1 manage 12.6 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig2_TChiWH.png r1 manage 60.8 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig2_TChiWZ.pdf r1 manage 12.6 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig2_TChiWZ.png r1 manage 62.3 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig2_TChiZZ.pdf r1 manage 11.9 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig2_TChiZZ.png r1 manage 57.2 K 2014-06-03 - 11:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig3_TChipmSlepSnu.pdf r1 manage 14.8 K 2014-06-03 - 12:14 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig3_TChipmSlepSnu.png r1 manage 68.4 K 2014-06-03 - 12:14 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig3_TSlepSlep.pdf r1 manage 11.8 K 2014-06-03 - 12:14 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig3_TSlepSlep.png r1 manage 59.3 K 2014-06-03 - 12:14 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig4_mt_Mll_3l_scatter.pdf r1 manage 39.6 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig4_mt_Mll_3l_scatter.png r1 manage 384.6 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig5_ossf1tau0.pdf r1 manage 116.4 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig5_ossf1tau0.png r1 manage 481.6 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig6_SS_MET.pdf r1 manage 103.7 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig6_SS_MET.png r1 manage 486.2 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig6_SS_SR.pdf r1 manage 88.6 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig6_SS_SR.png r1 manage 490.5 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig7_ZDIJET_met_inverted.pdf r1 manage 20.8 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig7_ZDIJET_met_inverted.png r1 manage 323.7 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig7_ZDIJET_mll_inverted.pdf r1 manage 16.8 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig7_ZDIJET_mll_inverted.png r1 manage 275.8 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig8_sig_met100_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 16.5 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig8_sig_met100_mbb_errband.png r1 manage 306.5 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig8_sig_met125_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 16.7 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig8_sig_met125_mbb_errband.png r1 manage 318.1 K 2014-06-04 - 14:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig8_sig_met150_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 16.4 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig8_sig_met150_mbb_errband.png r1 manage 304.6 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig8_sig_met175_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 16.7 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig8_sig_met175_mbb_errband.png r1 manage 304.4 K 2014-06-04 - 14:33 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Fig9_p_dijet_lep_mass.pdf r1 manage 20.2 K 2014-06-04 - 14:47 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Fig9_p_dijet_lep_mass.png r1 manage 457.9 K 2014-06-04 - 14:47 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf HT0MET120.pdf r1 manage 50.9 K 2014-06-04 - 20:43 StefanWayand  
PNGpng HT0MET120.png r1 manage 12.7 K 2014-06-04 - 20:43 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf L3DY0Tau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.8 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng L3DY0Tau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r2 r1 manage 99.4 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf L3DY0Tau1b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng L3DY0Tau1b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r2 r1 manage 99.6 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf L3DY1ZVZHTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng L3DY1ZVZHTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r2 r1 manage 98.8 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf L3DY1ZVZLTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng L3DY1ZVZLTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r2 r1 manage 100.4 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf MCT-diag.pdf r1 manage 28.4 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PNGpng MCT-diag.png r1 manage 8.3 K 2014-06-05 - 12:10 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf MET_log.pdf r2 r1 manage 91.1 K 2014-06-10 - 14:18 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng MET_log.png r2 r1 manage 91.1 K 2014-06-10 - 14:18 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf ObsPred_NBJetsMed_lin.pdf r2 r1 manage 110.2 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng ObsPred_NBJetsMed_lin.png r2 r1 manage 110.2 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf ObsPred_NJets_lin.pdf r2 r1 manage 115.8 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng ObsPred_NJets_lin.png r2 r1 manage 115.8 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf PRatio_Electrons_Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 70.2 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng PRatio_Electrons_Pt.png r2 r1 manage 70.2 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf PRatio_Muons_Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 69.6 K 2014-06-10 - 13:54 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng PRatio_Muons_Pt.png r2 r1 manage 69.6 K 2014-06-10 - 13:51 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf Rayleighfit_data.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.3 K 2014-06-19 - 10:42 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng Rayleighfit_data.png r2 r1 manage 113.8 K 2014-06-19 - 10:42 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf SS_HTvsMET.pdf r2 r1 manage 34.2 K 2014-06-10 - 14:20 SantiagoFolgueras  
PNGpng SS_HTvsMET.png r2 r1 manage 135.9 K 2014-06-10 - 14:17 SantiagoFolgueras  
PDFpdf SS_cutflow.pdf r1 manage 61.3 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng SS_cutflow.png r1 manage 774.9 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
Unknown file formatroot TChiSlepSnu_largex.root r1 manage 187.2 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiSlepSnu_middlex.root r1 manage 247.3 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiSlepSnu_middlex_enriched.root r1 manage 210.4 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiSlepSnu_smallx.root r1 manage 224.0 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiSlepSnu_smallx_enriched.root r1 manage 131.7 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiStauSnu.root r1 manage 93.9 K 2014-06-05 - 10:38 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf TChiWH_HtoTauTau.pdf r1 manage 41.1 K 2014-06-04 - 21:26 StefanWayand  
PNGpng TChiWH_HtoTauTau.png r1 manage 12.0 K 2014-06-04 - 21:26 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf TChiWH_HtoWW.pdf r1 manage 41.2 K 2014-06-04 - 21:28 StefanWayand  
PNGpng TChiWH_HtoWW.png r1 manage 12.6 K 2014-06-04 - 21:28 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf TChiWH_HtoZZ.pdf r1 manage 41.1 K 2014-06-04 - 21:28 StefanWayand  
PNGpng TChiWH_HtoZZ.png r1 manage 12.3 K 2014-06-04 - 21:28 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot TChiWZ.root r1 manage 161.6 K 2014-06-05 - 10:38 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatcsv TChipmSlepSnu_acceptance_20130815.csv r1 manage 47.6 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf TLTau.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.4 K 2014-06-19 - 10:45 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng TLTau.png r2 r1 manage 78.4 K 2014-06-19 - 10:45 LesyaShchutska  
Unknown file formatcsv TSlepSlep_acceptance.csv r1 manage 8.4 K 2014-06-05 - 10:38 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.0 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT_CMS_Preliminary.png r2 r1 manage 143.0 K 2014-06-23 - 18:23 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.4 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png r2 r1 manage 136.8 K 2014-06-23 - 18:27 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf TTbarControl_SingleMu_RelIso_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 15.0 K 2014-06-04 - 21:28 StefanWayand  
PNGpng TTbarControl_SingleMu_RelIso_CMS_Preliminary.png r2 r1 manage 78.9 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf Table10_mctnonresosdilep.pdf r1 manage 48.0 K 2014-06-04 - 16:13 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table10_mctnonresosdilep.png r1 manage 75.7 K 2014-06-04 - 16:13 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table11_ossf0tau0.pdf r2 r1 manage 48.0 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table11_ossf0tau0.png r2 r1 manage 156.1 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table12_ossf0tau1.pdf r2 r1 manage 48.0 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table12_ossf0tau1.png r2 r1 manage 144.6 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table13_ossf0tau1_c2.pdf r2 r1 manage 48.1 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table13_ossf0tau1_c2.png r2 r1 manage 161.1 K 2014-06-03 - 18:04 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table14_wh_multilep_result.pdf r1 manage 56.0 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table14_wh_multilep_result.png r1 manage 92.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table15_wh_multilep_result.pdf r1 manage 56.0 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table15_wh_multilep_result.png r1 manage 94.7 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table16_wh_multilep_result.pdf r1 manage 56.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table16_wh_multilep_result.png r1 manage 98.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table17_wh_multilep_result.pdf r1 manage 56.2 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table17_wh_multilep_result.png r1 manage 95.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:24 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table1_ossf1tau0.pdf r1 manage 48.3 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table1_ossf1tau0.png r1 manage 187.4 K 2014-06-03 - 16:22 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table2_fourlresult.pdf r1 manage 41.5 K 2014-06-03 - 18:13 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table2_fourlresult.png r1 manage 130.2 K 2014-06-03 - 18:13 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table3_ssresult.pdf r1 manage 44.5 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table3_ssresult.png r1 manage 124.3 K 2014-06-03 - 18:39 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table4_wz_zzesult.pdf r1 manage 43.0 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table4_wz_zzesult.png r1 manage 338.2 K 2014-06-03 - 19:11 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table5_wh_singlelep_resul.pdf r1 manage 84.4 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table5_wh_singlelep_resul.png r1 manage 252.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table6.pdf r1 manage 71.3 K 2014-06-05 - 12:27 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table6.png r1 manage 123.5 K 2014-06-05 - 12:27 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table6_wh_sslep_result.pdf r1 manage 73.9 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table6_wh_sslep_result.png r1 manage 176.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table7_wh_multilep_result.pdf r1 manage 40.9 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table7_wh_multilep_result.png r1 manage 86.4 K 2014-06-04 - 15:01 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table8_mctnonresosdilep.pdf r1 manage 41.1 K 2014-06-04 - 15:56 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table8_mctnonresosdilep.png r1 manage 91.8 K 2014-06-04 - 15:56 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf Table9_mctnonresosdilep.pdf r1 manage 50.0 K 2014-06-04 - 16:13 StefanWayand  
PNGpng Table9_mctnonresosdilep.png r1 manage 116.6 K 2014-06-04 - 16:13 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf WZControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.3 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng WZControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png r2 r1 manage 127.0 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf WZControl_DiLepton_MT_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.7 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng WZControl_DiLepton_MT_CMS_Preliminary.png r2 r1 manage 135.7 K 2014-06-23 - 18:25 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf WZ_19p5fb.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 64.7 K 2014-06-19 - 01:48 CharlesWelke  
PNGpng WZ_19p5fb.png r2 r1 manage 106.6 K 2014-06-18 - 19:40 CharlesWelke  
PDFpdf ZZ_19p5fb.pdf r2 r1 manage 64.7 K 2014-06-18 - 19:40 CharlesWelke  
PNGpng ZZ_19p5fb.png r2 r1 manage 119.3 K 2014-06-18 - 19:40 CharlesWelke  
PDFpdf btp_met.pdf r1 manage 16.7 K 2014-06-04 - 19:14 StefanWayand  
PNGpng btp_met.png r1 manage 13.3 K 2014-06-04 - 19:14 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf btp_mt.pdf r1 manage 17.5 K 2014-06-04 - 19:14 StefanWayand  
PNGpng btp_mt.png r1 manage 13.8 K 2014-06-04 - 19:14 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf closure_fake.pdf r1 manage 235.1 K 2014-06-13 - 16:09 StefanWayand  
PNGpng closure_fake.png r2 r1 manage 84.2 K 2014-06-13 - 16:09 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf closure_fs.pdf r2 r1 manage 231.3 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PNGpng closure_fs.png r2 r1 manage 162.8 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf closure_top_of.pdf r2 r1 manage 223.8 K 2014-06-13 - 16:03 StefanWayand  
PNGpng closure_top_of.png r2 r1 manage 149.1 K 2014-06-13 - 16:03 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf closure_top_sf.pdf r2 r1 manage 224.1 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PNGpng closure_top_sf.png r2 r1 manage 150.9 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf crdl_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.2 K 2014-06-05 - 21:17 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crdl_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 18.6 K 2014-06-05 - 21:18 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crdl_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.6 K 2014-06-05 - 21:18 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crdl_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 14.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:19 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crdl_presel_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.3 K 2014-06-05 - 21:19 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crdl_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 14.3 K 2014-06-05 - 21:20 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crdl_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:20 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crdl_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 14.6 K 2014-06-05 - 21:20 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crzb_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.3 K 2014-06-05 - 21:21 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crzb_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 17.2 K 2014-06-05 - 21:21 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crzb_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.9 K 2014-06-05 - 21:21 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crzb_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 14.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:21 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crzb_presel_mt.pdf r1 manage 18.4 K 2014-06-05 - 21:22 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crzb_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 14.6 K 2014-06-05 - 21:22 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf crzb_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.3 K 2014-06-05 - 21:23 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng crzb_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 14.1 K 2014-06-05 - 21:23 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf data_mc_3l.pdf r2 r1 manage 244.4 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng data_mc_3l.png r2 r1 manage 153.7 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf data_mc_3l_linear.pdf r2 r1 manage 243.6 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng data_mc_3l_linear.png r2 r1 manage 117.1 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf data_mc_z.pdf r2 r1 manage 251.2 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng data_mc_z.png r2 r1 manage 118.0 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf data_mc_z_linear.pdf r2 r1 manage 250.1 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PNGpng data_mc_z_linear.png r2 r1 manage 117.8 K 2014-06-12 - 17:36 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf datamc_crdl_mt2bl_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.0 K 2014-06-05 - 21:24 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng datamc_crdl_mt2bl_mt.png r2 r1 manage 14.5 K 2014-06-05 - 21:24 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf datamc_crmbb_allcuts.pdf r2 r1 manage 13.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:24 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng datamc_crmbb_allcuts.png r2 r1 manage 13.4 K 2014-06-05 - 21:24 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf datamc_crmbb_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2014-06-05 - 21:25 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng datamc_crmbb_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2014-06-05 - 21:25 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf datamc_crzb_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2014-06-05 - 21:25 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng datamc_crzb_mt.png r2 r1 manage 13.6 K 2014-06-05 - 21:25 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf dilmass_19p5fb.pdf r2 r1 manage 77.4 K 2014-06-11 - 14:56 BenHooberman  
PNGpng dilmass_19p5fb.png r2 r1 manage 105.5 K 2014-06-11 - 14:56 BenHooberman  
PDFpdf dilmass_19p5fb_table.pdf r1 manage 72.5 K 2014-06-04 - 20:20 StefanWayand  
PNGpng dilmass_19p5fb_table.png r1 manage 234.9 K 2014-06-04 - 20:20 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf dilmass_19p5fb_targeted_table.pdf r1 manage 63.7 K 2014-06-04 - 20:20 StefanWayand  
PNGpng dilmass_19p5fb_targeted_table.png r1 manage 180.6 K 2014-06-04 - 20:20 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.pdf r2 r1 manage 65.2 K 2014-06-18 - 19:40 CharlesWelke  
PNGpng dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.png r2 r1 manage 138.9 K 2014-06-18 - 19:40 CharlesWelke  
Texttxt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoTauTau.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2014-06-05 - 11:57 StefanWayand  
Texttxt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoWW.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2014-06-05 - 11:57 StefanWayand  
Texttxt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoZZ.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2014-06-05 - 11:57 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_Combined.root r1 manage 22.9 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_GMSB.root r1 manage 23.9 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_05.root r2 r1 manage 42.8 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_5.root r2 r1 manage 41.4 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2a_0_95.root r2 r1 manage 44.5 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_05.root r2 r1 manage 39.9 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_5.root r2 r1 manage 38.1 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiSlepSnu_2i_0_95.root r2 r1 manage 41.1 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiStauSnu_0_5.root r2 r1 manage 44.7 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiWH.root r1 manage 32.5 K 2014-06-19 - 20:42 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChiWZ.root r2 r1 manage 35.9 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TChipmSlepSnu.root r2 r1 manage 43.3 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TSlepSlep.root r1 manage 43.7 K 2014-06-05 - 10:37 StefanWayand  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TSlepSlepL.root r1 manage 30.1 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
Unknown file formatroot exclusion_TSlepSlepR.root r1 manage 31.2 K 2014-06-19 - 20:30 FedorRatnikov  
PDFpdf exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_r.pdf r1 manage 36.8 K 2014-06-04 - 18:49 StefanWayand  
PNGpng exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_r.png r1 manage 150.1 K 2014-06-04 - 18:49 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf exclusion_summary.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng exclusion_summary.png r2 r1 manage 192.0 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf exclusion_summary_linear_norm.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.7 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng exclusion_summary_linear_norm.png r2 r1 manage 168.1 K 2014-06-23 - 10:54 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf exclusions_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_ratio.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-06-23 - 19:39 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng exclusions_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_ratio.png r1 manage 154.0 K 2014-06-23 - 19:39 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf fsr_mu3_invmass_19p5ifb_twiki.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.6 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng fsr_mu3_invmass_19p5ifb_twiki.png r2 r1 manage 91.1 K 2014-06-23 - 18:21 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf internal_externalconversions.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.4 K 2014-06-19 - 10:42 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng internal_externalconversions.png r2 r1 manage 92.9 K 2014-06-19 - 10:42 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf limits_summary_table.pdf r1 manage 178.3 K 2014-06-04 - 18:26 StefanWayand  
PNGpng limits_summary_table.png r1 manage 205.9 K 2014-06-04 - 18:26 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf mc_only_of.pdf r2 r1 manage 291.2 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PNGpng mc_only_of.png r2 r1 manage 87.1 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf mc_only_sf.pdf r2 r1 manage 291.5 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PNGpng mc_only_sf.png r2 r1 manage 88.9 K 2014-06-13 - 08:35 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf mjj_targeted_19p5fb.pdf r2 r1 manage 79.0 K 2014-06-18 - 19:41 CharlesWelke  
PNGpng mjj_targeted_19p5fb.png r2 r1 manage 125.6 K 2014-06-18 - 19:41 CharlesWelke  
PDFpdf p_elfr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_elfr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.png r2 r1 manage 97.0 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_eta.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_eta.png r2 r1 manage 106.1 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_pt.png r2 r1 manage 111.0 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_lepdeta.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.7 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_lepdeta.png r2 r1 manage 236.8 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_max_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.6 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_max_mt.png r2 r1 manage 204.0 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.2 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_met.png r2 r1 manage 195.9 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_mt2j.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.6 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_mt2j.png r2 r1 manage 192.6 K 2014-06-21 - 08:21 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_mufr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.3 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_mufr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.png r2 r1 manage 95.4 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_eta.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.5 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_eta.png r2 r1 manage 105.6 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.7 K 2014-06-21 - 08:51 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_pt.png r2 r1 manage 109.0 K 2014-06-21 - 08:53 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_nlbtags.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.2 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_nlbtags.png r2 r1 manage 221.0 K 2014-06-21 - 08:21 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_ntbtags.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.2 K 2014-06-21 - 08:15 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_ntbtags.png r2 r1 manage 192.5 K 2014-06-21 - 08:21 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_pt1.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.1 K 2014-06-21 - 08:18 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_pt1.png r2 r1 manage 215.6 K 2014-06-21 - 08:23 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_pt2.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.4 K 2014-06-21 - 08:18 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_pt2.png r2 r1 manage 188.9 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_pt3.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.2 K 2014-06-21 - 08:18 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_pt3.png r2 r1 manage 251.7 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf p_yield.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.3 K 2014-06-21 - 08:18 JasonGran  
PNGpng p_yield.png r2 r1 manage 151.2 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf pfmet_reweight_mu_u1.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.2 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PNGpng pfmet_reweight_mu_u1.png r3 r2 r1 manage 13.2 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PDFpdf pfmet_reweight_mu_u2.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.7 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PNGpng pfmet_reweight_mu_u2.png r3 r2 r1 manage 12.2 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PDFpdf pfmet_reweight_sigma0_u1.pdf r1 manage 17.4 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PNGpng pfmet_reweight_sigma0_u1.png r3 r2 r1 manage 12.3 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PDFpdf pfmet_reweight_sigma0_u2.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.3 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PNGpng pfmet_reweight_sigma0_u2.png r3 r2 r1 manage 10.9 K 2014-06-19 - 11:21 PieterEveraerts  
PDFpdf pres_mljj.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.3 K 2014-06-21 - 08:18 JasonGran  
PNGpng pres_mljj.png r2 r1 manage 216.7 K 2014-06-21 - 08:22 JasonGran  
PDFpdf projection_300fb.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.9 K 2014-06-06 - 18:24 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng projection_300fb.png r2 r1 manage 20.3 K 2014-06-06 - 18:24 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf sig_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.9 K 2014-06-05 - 21:26 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng sig_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 18.1 K 2014-06-05 - 21:26 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf sig_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.5 K 2014-06-05 - 21:26 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng sig_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 16.0 K 2014-06-05 - 21:27 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf sig_presel_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:27 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng sig_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 15.9 K 2014-06-05 - 21:27 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf sig_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.4 K 2014-06-05 - 21:27 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng sig_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 15.7 K 2014-06-05 - 21:27 DominickOlivito  
PDFpdf singlelep_bestRegion.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.8 K 2014-06-05 - 21:29 DominickOlivito  
PNGpng singlelep_bestRegion.png r2 r1 manage 25.3 K 2014-06-05 - 21:29 DominickOlivito  
Unknown file formatroot singlelep_results.root r2 r1 manage 20.2 K 2014-06-06 - 10:42 DominickOlivito  
Unknown file formatroot ss_eff_map.root r1 manage 4.3 K 2014-06-05 - 11:57 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf ss_pres_yields.pdf r1 manage 28.7 K 2014-06-04 - 19:59 StefanWayand  
PNGpng ss_pres_yields.png r1 manage 70.1 K 2014-06-04 - 19:59 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf wh_1l_cutflow.pdf r1 manage 65.8 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng wh_1l_cutflow.png r1 manage 96.6 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
Unknown file formatroot wh_met_limits.root r1 manage 10.7 K 2014-06-05 - 15:31 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf wh_ss_cutflow.pdf r1 manage 68.4 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng wh_ss_cutflow.png r1 manage 577.5 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf zllvjj_validation.pdf r2 r1 manage 57.4 K 2014-06-11 - 14:20 BenHooberman  
PNGpng zllvjj_validation.png r2 r1 manage 60.9 K 2014-06-11 - 14:35 BenHooberman  
PDFpdf zllvjj_validation_table.pdf r1 manage 138.6 K 2014-06-04 - 20:21 StefanWayand  
PNGpng zllvjj_validation_table.png r1 manage 267.5 K 2014-06-04 - 20:21 StefanWayand  
PDFpdf zmet_results_gmsb.pdf r1 manage 51.4 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng zmet_results_gmsb.png r1 manage 68.4 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PDFpdf zmet_results_wz.pdf r1 manage 51.2 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
PNGpng zmet_results_wz.png r1 manage 60.9 K 2014-08-18 - 11:52 LesyaShchutska  
Topic revision: r27 - 2015-05-13 - FilipMoortgat
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2018 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback