Further information

This analysis is documented in CMS-PAS-SUS-13-017. The Table and Figure numbers in this twiki correspond to the table and figure numbers in the PAS.

Abstract

This note reports the results for searches for the direct electroweak production of supersymmetric charginos and neutralinos in final states with a Higgs boson. The data sample consists of pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy √s = 8 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.5fb-1. The signature consists of a chargino-neutralino pair decaying to a W boson, a Higgs boson, and ETmiss from escaping lightest supersymmetric particles. The data are consistent with the standard model backgrounds.

Approved tables and plots (click on plot to get larger version)

Material in PAS

Figure Caption
Figure 1: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state.
Table 1: Summary of results for the single lepton analysis. The expected background contributions are compared to the observed yields in data for the four signal regions. The expectations from a few signal points are indicated; the first number indicates $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ ($= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$) and the second number indicates $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$. The uncertainties that are shown contain statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Figure 2a: Dijet mass for the single lepton analysis signal region with ETmiss > 100 GeV and all cuts applied except dijet mass. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The signal region is the bin from 100 to 150 GeV. Three sample signal model points are also indicated. The uncertainty band includes the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the background prediction.
Figure 2b: Dijet mass for the single lepton analysis signal region with ETmiss > 125 GeV and all cuts applied except dijet mass. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The signal region is the bin from 100 to 150 GeV. Three sample signal model points are also indicated. The uncertainty band includes the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the background prediction.
Figure 2c: Dijet mass for the single lepton analysis signal region with ETmiss > 150 GeV and all cuts applied except dijet mass. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The signal region is the bin from 100 to 150 GeV. Three sample signal model points are also indicated. The uncertainty band includes the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the background prediction.
Figure 2d: Dijet mass for the single lepton analysis signal region with ETmiss > 175 GeV and all cuts applied except dijet mass. The data are compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds. The signal region is the bin from 100 to 150 GeV. Three sample signal model points are also indicated. The uncertainty band includes the statistical and systematic uncertainty on the background prediction.
Figure 3: The observed $M_{ljj}$ distribution in the same-sign dilepton analysis, compared to the sum of the expected backgrounds, after all selection requirements except that on $M_{ljj}$. An example signal model point with $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 130 GeV and $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV is overlaid. The signal normalization has been scaled up by a factor of 5 relative to the theory prediction.
Table 2: Summary of results for the same-sign dilepton analysis. The expected background contributions are compared to the observed yields in data. The uncertainties that are shown contain statistical and systematic uncertainties. The expected signal yields in several example model points are also indicated.
Table 3: Multi-lepton results, along with the number of expected signal events, in the 5 best signal regions for the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point. All signal regions shown have exactly three selected leptons, a veto on b-tagged jets, and HT < 200 GeV. The results are binned in the number of hadronic $\tau$ candidates and the ETmiss. Above Z (below Z) indicates the presence of an OSSF pair with invariant mass $M_{\ell\ell} >$ 105 GeV (< 75 GeV).
Figure 4: The interpretation of the combined results from the three search channels. The upper limit on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ production cross section is indicated in the color scale. The expected and observed regions for which the signal model is excluded reach from the origin to the solid red and solid black curve, respectively. The dashed red lines show the $\pm 1\sigma$ variations on the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties and the thin black lines indicate the uncertainty due to the cross section calculation.
Figure 5a: The interpretations of the results from the single lepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times $\mathcal{B}(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} \to WH)$. The green band shows the $\pm 1\sigma$ variations on the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty on the cross section calculation.
Figure 5b: The interpretations of the results from the same-sign dilepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times $\mathcal{B}(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} \to WH)$. The green band shows the $\pm 1\sigma$ variations on the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty on the cross section calculation.
Figure 5c: The interpretations of the results from the multi-lepton search. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times $\mathcal{B}(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} \to WH)$. The green band shows the $\pm 1\sigma$ variations on the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty on the cross section calculation.
Figure 5d: The interpretations of the results from the combination of the three searches. The black curves show the expected (dashed) and observed (solid) limits on the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times $\mathcal{B}(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} \to WH)$. The green band shows the $\pm 1\sigma$ variations on the expected limit due to experimental uncertainties. The solid blue curve shows the theoretical prediction for the cross section, with the dashed blue bands indicating the uncertainty on the cross section calculation.
Table 4: Multi-lepton results, along with the number of expected signal events, in the 5 best signal regions for the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 150 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point. All signal regions shown have exactly three selected leptons, a veto on b-tagged jets, and HT < 200 GeV. The results are binned in the number of hadronic $\tau$ candidates and the ETmiss. Above Z (below Z) indicates the presence of an OSSF pair with invariant mass $M_{\ell\ell} >$ 105 GeV (< 75 GeV).
Table 5: Multi-lepton results, along with the number of expected signal events, in the 5 best signal regions for the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 200 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point. All signal regions shown have exactly three selected leptons, a veto on b-tagged jets, and HT < 200 GeV. The results are binned in the number of hadronic $\tau$ candidates and the ETmiss. Above Z (below Z) indicates the presence of an OSSF pair with invariant mass $M_{\ell\ell} >$ 105 GeV (< 75 GeV).
Table 6: Multi-lepton results, along with the number of expected signal events, in the 5 best signal regions for the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 300 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point. All signal regions shown have exactly three selected leptons, a veto on b-tagged jets, and HT < 200 GeV. The results are binned in the number of hadronic $\tau$ candidates and the ETmiss. Above Z (below Z) indicates the presence of an OSSF pair with invariant mass $M_{\ell\ell} >$ 105 GeV (< 75 GeV).
Table 7: Multi-lepton results, along with the number of expected signal events, in the 5 best signal regions for the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 400 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point. All signal regions shown have exactly three selected leptons, a veto on b-tagged jets, and HT < 200 GeV. The results are binned in the number of hadronic $\tau$ candidates and the ETmiss. Above Z (below Z) indicates the presence of an OSSF pair with invariant mass $M_{\ell\ell} >$ 105 GeV (< 75 GeV).

Additional single lepton plots, not in PAS

The attached root file has 2d maps of signal efficiency (in percent) for each of the analysis signal regions, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → bb.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure 1: Dijet mass in CR-2l after preselection.
Additional Figure 2: ETmiss in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 3: MT in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 4: MT2bl in CR-2l after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 5: Dijet mass in CR-0b after preselection.
Additional Figure 6: ETmiss in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 7: MT in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 8: MT2bl in CR-0b after preselection and the dijet mass requirement.
Additional Figure 9: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-2l after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and either the MT or MT2bl cut. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 1.0 +/- 0.4 on the dilepton top background, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure 10: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-Mbb after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and the MT2bl cut. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 0.75 +/- 0.25 for the efficiency of the single lepton backgrounds to pass the MT2bl cut, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure 11: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-0b after preselection, the dijet mass requirement, and the MT2bl and MT cuts. This plot is used to derive a scale factor and uncertainty of 1.1 +/- 0.1 for the efficiency of the W+jets backgrounds to pass the MT cut, indicated by the magenta lines. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure 12: Ratio of data over prediction for CR-Mbb after all cuts except ETmiss and with all scale factors applied. This plot is used to validate the total background prediction. The uncertainties shown are statistical.
Additional Figure 13: Dijet mass after analysis preselection. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 20.
Additional Figure 14: ETmiss after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure 15: MT after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure 16: MT2bl after analysis preselection and the dijet mass requirement. The total prediction has been normalized to data in the plot to show the shape agreement. An example signal point is overlaid, scaled up by a factor of 10.
Additional Figure 17: Selected best signal region for each mass point, based on the expected cross-section limits.
Additional Figure 18: Estimated 5$\sigma$ discovery reach in 300 fb$^{-1}$ 14 TeV data, in the plane of the $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}$ mass vs. the common mass of the $\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ and $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}$ particles. The signal and background yields for the tightest signal region ($E_{T}^{miss} > 175$ GeV) of the single lepton analysis are extrapolated based on the increased production cross section and the factor of 15 increase in the integrated luminosity. In scenario A, the same systematic uncertainty on the background prediction as in the 8 TeV analysis (25%) is assumed; in scenario B this systematic uncertainty is reduced by a factor of 2.

Additional same-sign plots, not in PAS

The attached root file has a 2d map of signal efficiency (in percent) for the single signal region of the same-sign analysis, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → WW.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure 1: Max $M_{T}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure 2: ETmiss after preselection.
Additional Figure 3: $M_{ljj}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure 4: $M_{T2}^{j}$ after preselection.
Additional Figure 5: Number of CSVL b-tagged jets after preselection.
Additional Figure 6: Number of CSVT b-tagged jets after preselection.
Additional Figure 7: p$_{T}$ of the highest p$_{T}$ lepton after preselection.
Additional Figure 8: p$_{T}$ of the lowest p$_{T}$ lepton after preselection.
Additional Figure 9: p$_{T}$ of the third lepton, if present, after preselection.
Additional Figure 10: $\Delta \eta$ between leptons after preselection.
Additional Figure 11: Total yield after preselection, including a breakdown by flavor.
Additional Figure 13: Background and data yields after preselection.
Additional Figure 14: Electron fake rate as a function of $\eta$.
Additional Figure 15: Electron fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$.
Additional Figure 16: Electron fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$, with and without the electroweak correction.
Additional Figure 17: Muon fake rate as a function of $\eta$.
Additional Figure 18: Muon fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$.
Additional Figure 19: Muon fake rate as a function of p$_{T}$, with and without the electroweak correction.

Additional multi-lepton plots, not in PAS

The attached files efficiencies_multilepton_HtoWW.txt, efficiencies_multilepton_HtoTauTau.txt, and efficiencies_multilepton_HtoZZ.txt contain the signal efficiency for the top 5 analysis signal regions at the $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}= M_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV model point, given with respect to the total $\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}$ cross section times the branching fractions for W → $\ell\nu$ and H → WW, H → $\tau\tau$, H → ZZ respectively.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure 1: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → WW*.
Additional Figure 2: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → ZZ*.
Additional Figure 3: The signal topology targeted in this note: chargino-neutralino pair production leading to the WH+ETmiss final state, where H → τ τ.
Additional Figure 4: A comparison of data and simulation for the ETmiss distribution for events with an opposite-sign electron-muon pair, a dataset dominated by ttbar production, shown in absolute yields.
Additional Figure 5: A comparison of data and simulation for the HT distribution for events with an opposite-sign electron-muon pair, a dataset dominated by ttbar production, shown in absolute yields.
Additional Figure 6: Isolation distribution used for data-driven background estimation.
Additional Figure 7: ETmiss distribution in WZ control region (3-leptons including 1 on-Z OSSF pair, HT < 200 GeV, and Transverse mass between 50 and 100 GeV)
Additional Figure 8: The transverse mass distribution of events in a data sample enriched in WZ requiring an OSSF pair with invariant mass in the Z-window and 50 GeV < ETmiss < 100 GeV (Linear Scale).
Additional Figure 9: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons (no OSSF pair or hadronic taus), no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure 10: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons (no OSSF pair) including 1 hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure 11: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons including 1 OSSF pair above Z, no hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.
Additional Figure 12: Background breakdown vs ETmiss for 3-leptons including 1 OSSF pair below Z, no hadronic tau, no b-tag, with signal at $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 130 GeV, $M_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 1 GeV stacked on top of the SM background.

Additional interpretation plots, not in PAS

The attached root file has a 2d map of the observed upper limits on the signal cross-section as well as the exclusion contours.

Figure Caption
Additional Figure 1: Interpretation of the combined results. Results are the same as Fig. 5d in the PAS, except that here the ratio of cross section upper limit to theory prediction is displayed.
Additional Figure 2: Summary of the interpretations for the combined results and the results from the three individual channels. Cross section upper limits are compared to the theory prediction.
Additional Figure 3: Summary of the interpretations for the combined results and the results from the three individual channels. The ratio of cross section limit to theory prediction is displayed.
Additional Figure 4: Summary plot of the observed excluded regions in this analysis and in several models from SUS-13-006 "Search for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons using leptonic final states in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV".
Additional Figure 4(alternate): Alternate version of summary plot above. Summary plot of the observed and expected excluded regions in this analysis and in several models from SUS-13-006 "Search for electroweak production of charginos, neutralinos, and sleptons using leptonic final states in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV".
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
pdf L3DY0Tau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r1 manage 15.4 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png L3DY0Tau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r1 manage 71.9 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf L3DY0Tau1b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png L3DY0Tau1b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r1 manage 73.0 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf L3DY1ZVZHTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png L3DY1ZVZHTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r1 manage 71.4 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf L3DY1ZVZLTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.pdf r1 manage 15.6 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png L3DY1ZVZLTau0b0_METHT_WinoNLSP_chargino130_bino1_hw.png r1 manage 73.0 K 2013-10-01 - 00:28 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf SUS-13-017_Table1_v1.pdf r1 manage 86.7 K 2013-08-18 - 19:25 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png SUS-13-017_Table1_v1.png r2 r1 manage 113.2 K 2013-08-23 - 01:34 JasonGran
pdf SUS-13-017_Table2_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 108.9 K 2013-08-21 - 19:04 JasonGran
png SUS-13-017_Table2_v1.png r1 manage 122.2 K 2013-08-21 - 19:09 JasonGran
pdf SUS-13-017_Table2_v2.pdf r2 r1 manage 117.0 K 2013-08-28 - 18:50 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table2_v2.png r2 r1 manage 69.9 K 2013-08-28 - 18:51 BenHooberman
pdf SUS-13-017_Table3_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 117.2 K 2013-08-23 - 13:06 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table3_v1.png r2 r1 manage 44.0 K 2013-08-23 - 13:07 BenHooberman
pdf SUS-13-017_Table4_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 91.7 K 2013-08-23 - 13:10 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table4_v1.png r2 r1 manage 45.5 K 2013-08-23 - 13:11 BenHooberman
pdf SUS-13-017_Table5_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 91.7 K 2013-08-23 - 13:11 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table5_v1.png r2 r1 manage 45.7 K 2013-08-23 - 13:11 BenHooberman
pdf SUS-13-017_Table6_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 91.7 K 2013-08-23 - 13:12 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table6_v1.png r2 r1 manage 47.2 K 2013-08-23 - 13:12 BenHooberman
pdf SUS-13-017_Table7_v1.pdf r2 r1 manage 91.7 K 2013-08-23 - 13:12 BenHooberman
png SUS-13-017_Table7_v1.png r2 r1 manage 45.5 K 2013-08-23 - 13:13 BenHooberman
pdf TChiWH.pdf r1 manage 40.4 K 2013-08-14 - 12:52 BenHooberman
png TChiWH.png r1 manage 25.9 K 2013-08-14 - 12:53 BenHooberman
pdf TChiWH_HtoTauTau.pdf r1 manage 41.1 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TChiWH_HtoTauTau.png r1 manage 12.0 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf TChiWH_HtoWW.pdf r1 manage 41.2 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TChiWH_HtoWW.png r1 manage 12.6 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf TChiWH_HtoZZ.pdf r1 manage 41.1 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TChiWH_HtoZZ.png r1 manage 12.3 K 2013-08-18 - 08:54 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 19.6 K 2013-08-18 - 09:14 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TTbarControl_DiLepton_HT_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 131.9 K 2013-08-18 - 09:15 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 18.0 K 2013-08-18 - 09:14 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TTbarControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 118.0 K 2013-08-18 - 09:15 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf TTbarControl_SingleMu_RelIso_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 15.0 K 2013-08-18 - 09:14 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png TTbarControl_SingleMu_RelIso_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 44.1 K 2013-08-18 - 09:15 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf WZControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 20.9 K 2013-08-18 - 09:14 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png WZControl_DiLepton_MET_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 121.8 K 2013-08-18 - 09:15 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf WZControl_DiLepton_MT_CMS_Preliminary.pdf r1 manage 21.3 K 2013-08-18 - 09:14 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
png WZControl_DiLepton_MT_CMS_Preliminary.png r1 manage 131.1 K 2013-08-18 - 09:15 EmmanuelContrerasCampana
pdf crdl_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.2 K 2013-08-23 - 00:53 DominickOlivito
png crdl_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 34.9 K 2013-08-23 - 00:53 DominickOlivito
pdf crdl_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.7 K 2013-08-23 - 00:53 DominickOlivito
png crdl_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 29.0 K 2013-08-23 - 00:54 DominickOlivito
pdf crdl_presel_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.4 K 2013-08-23 - 00:54 DominickOlivito
png crdl_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 29.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:54 DominickOlivito
pdf crdl_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:54 DominickOlivito
png crdl_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 29.1 K 2013-08-23 - 00:55 DominickOlivito
pdf crzb_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:55 DominickOlivito
png crzb_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 34.1 K 2013-08-23 - 00:55 DominickOlivito
pdf crzb_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.3 K 2013-08-23 - 00:56 DominickOlivito
png crzb_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 29.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:56 DominickOlivito
pdf crzb_presel_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.6 K 2013-08-23 - 00:56 DominickOlivito
png crzb_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 29.9 K 2013-08-23 - 00:57 DominickOlivito
pdf crzb_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:57 DominickOlivito
png crzb_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 27.9 K 2013-08-23 - 00:57 DominickOlivito
pdf datamc_crdl_mt2bl_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.0 K 2013-08-23 - 00:58 DominickOlivito
png datamc_crdl_mt2bl_mt.png r2 r1 manage 14.7 K 2013-08-23 - 00:58 DominickOlivito
pdf datamc_crmbb_allcuts.pdf r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:58 DominickOlivito
png datamc_crmbb_allcuts.png r2 r1 manage 15.1 K 2013-08-23 - 00:59 DominickOlivito
pdf datamc_crmbb_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2013-08-23 - 00:59 DominickOlivito
png datamc_crmbb_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 14.1 K 2013-08-23 - 01:00 DominickOlivito
pdf datamc_crzb_mt.pdf r1 manage 13.7 K 2013-08-23 - 01:01 DominickOlivito
png datamc_crzb_mt.png r2 r1 manage 13.8 K 2013-08-23 - 01:00 DominickOlivito
txt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoTauTau.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2013-09-06 - 19:23 PeterThomassen
txt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoWW.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2013-09-06 - 19:23 PeterThomassen
txt efficiencies_multilepton_HtoZZ.txt r1 manage 0.6 K 2013-09-06 - 19:23 PeterThomassen
pdf exclusion_Wino2D_DOW-JG-RG.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 22.4 K 2013-08-27 - 12:34 PeterThomassen
png exclusion_Wino2D_DOW-JG-RG.png r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 160.6 K 2013-08-27 - 12:34 PeterThomassen
pdf exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG.pdf r2 r1 manage 38.0 K 2013-08-21 - 14:46 BenHooberman
png exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG.png r2 r1 manage 149.6 K 2013-08-21 - 14:47 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_r.pdf r2 r1 manage 36.8 K 2013-08-21 - 14:38 BenHooberman
png exclusion_Wino_DOW-JG-RG_r.png r2 r1 manage 150.1 K 2013-08-21 - 14:39 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_Wino_DOW.pdf r2 r1 manage 38.3 K 2013-08-21 - 14:50 BenHooberman
png exclusion_Wino_DOW.png r2 r1 manage 148.3 K 2013-08-21 - 14:48 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_Wino_JG.pdf r2 r1 manage 38.3 K 2013-08-21 - 14:48 BenHooberman
png exclusion_Wino_JG.png r2 r1 manage 142.3 K 2013-08-21 - 14:48 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_Wino_RG.pdf r2 r1 manage 38.0 K 2013-08-21 - 14:49 BenHooberman
png exclusion_Wino_RG.png r2 r1 manage 149.0 K 2013-08-21 - 14:49 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_summary.pdf r1 manage 15.5 K 2013-08-21 - 14:20 BenHooberman
png exclusion_summary.png r1 manage 28.1 K 2013-08-21 - 14:20 BenHooberman
pdf exclusion_summary_linear_norm.pdf r1 manage 15.3 K 2013-08-21 - 14:20 BenHooberman
png exclusion_summary_linear_norm.png r1 manage 27.0 K 2013-08-21 - 14:20 BenHooberman
root limits.root r1 manage 10.7 K 2013-08-23 - 17:33 PeterThomassen
pdf mljj.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 38.5 K 2013-08-22 - 00:17 JasonGran
png mljj.png r3 r2 r1 manage 21.9 K 2013-08-22 - 00:17 JasonGran
pdf p_elfr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.1 K 2013-08-23 - 02:13 RyanWardKelley
png p_elfr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.png r3 r2 r1 manage 18.7 K 2013-08-23 - 02:14 RyanWardKelley updated titles
pdf p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_eta.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.1 K 2013-08-23 - 03:11 RyanWardKelley updated titles
png p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_eta.png r3 r2 r1 manage 20.6 K 2013-08-23 - 03:11 RyanWardKelley updated titles
pdf p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_pt.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.5 K 2013-08-23 - 03:11 RyanWardKelley updated titles
png p_elfr_ewkcor_vs_pt.png r3 r2 r1 manage 23.0 K 2013-08-23 - 03:11 RyanWardKelley updated titles
pdf p_lepdeta.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.3 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
png p_lepdeta.png r2 r1 manage 20.4 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
pdf p_max_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 20.2 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
png p_max_mt.png r2 r1 manage 20.5 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
pdf p_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 16.8 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
png p_met.png r2 r1 manage 19.7 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
pdf p_mt2j.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.2 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
png p_mt2j.png r2 r1 manage 19.5 K 2013-08-21 - 22:10 JasonGran
pdf p_mufr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 14.9 K 2013-08-23 - 02:13 RyanWardKelley updated titles
png p_mufr40c_vs_pt_compare_ewkcor.png r3 r2 r1 manage 17.9 K 2013-08-23 - 02:13 RyanWardKelley updated titles
pdf p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_eta.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.1 K 2013-08-23 - 03:12 RyanWardKelley
png p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_eta.png r3 r2 r1 manage 20.9 K 2013-08-23 - 03:12 RyanWardKelley
pdf p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_pt.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.3 K 2013-08-23 - 03:12 RyanWardKelley
png p_mufr_ewkcor_vs_pt.png r3 r2 r1 manage 21.7 K 2013-08-23 - 03:12 RyanWardKelley
pdf p_nlbtags.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.8 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_nlbtags.png r2 r1 manage 17.7 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf p_ntbtags.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.8 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_ntbtags.png r2 r1 manage 17.4 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf p_pt1.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.7 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_pt1.png r2 r1 manage 21.9 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf p_pt2.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.0 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_pt2.png r2 r1 manage 19.8 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf p_pt3.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.8 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_pt3.png r2 r1 manage 21.2 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf p_yield.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.9 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png p_yield.png r2 r1 manage 16.2 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf pres_mljj.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 20.9 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
png pres_mljj.png r3 r2 r1 manage 21.0 K 2013-08-21 - 22:11 JasonGran
pdf projection_300fb.pdf r1 manage 31.1 K 2013-09-25 - 12:25 BenHooberman
png projection_300fb.png r1 manage 101.7 K 2013-09-25 - 12:25 BenHooberman
pdf sig_met100_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 17.2 K 2013-08-17 - 16:35 DominickOlivito
png sig_met100_mbb_errband.png r2 r1 manage 21.7 K 2013-08-17 - 17:04 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_met125_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2013-08-17 - 16:35 DominickOlivito
png sig_met125_mbb_errband.png r2 r1 manage 20.7 K 2013-08-17 - 17:05 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_met150_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 16.7 K 2013-08-17 - 16:35 DominickOlivito
png sig_met150_mbb_errband.png r2 r1 manage 20.4 K 2013-08-17 - 17:05 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_met175_mbb_errband.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2013-08-17 - 16:35 DominickOlivito
png sig_met175_mbb_errband.png r2 r1 manage 20.3 K 2013-08-17 - 17:05 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_presel_mbb.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.8 K 2013-08-23 - 01:01 DominickOlivito
png sig_presel_mbb.png r2 r1 manage 35.3 K 2013-08-23 - 01:01 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_presel_met.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.3 K 2013-08-23 - 01:02 DominickOlivito
png sig_presel_met.png r2 r1 manage 32.7 K 2013-08-23 - 01:02 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_presel_mt.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.7 K 2013-08-23 - 01:02 DominickOlivito
png sig_presel_mt.png r2 r1 manage 33.2 K 2013-08-23 - 01:03 DominickOlivito
pdf sig_presel_mt2bl.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.1 K 2013-08-23 - 01:03 DominickOlivito
png sig_presel_mt2bl.png r2 r1 manage 31.8 K 2013-08-23 - 01:03 DominickOlivito
pdf singlelep_bestRegion.pdf r1 manage 21.0 K 2013-08-19 - 11:25 DominickOlivito
png singlelep_bestRegion.png r1 manage 42.6 K 2013-08-19 - 11:25 DominickOlivito
root singlelep_results.root r2 r1 manage 20.0 K 2013-08-19 - 13:30 DominickOlivito
root ss_eff_map.root r1 manage 4.3 K 2013-08-29 - 02:26 JasonGran
pdf ss_pres_yields.pdf r1 manage 28.7 K 2013-08-19 - 08:17 JasonGran
png ss_pres_yields.png r1 manage 70.1 K 2013-08-19 - 08:17 JasonGran
Edit | Watch | Print version | History: r10 < r9 < r8 < r7 < r6 | Backlinks | Raw View | More topic actions
Topic revision: r10 - 2014-07-03 - KeithUlmer

Create a LeftBar

 Cern Search TWiki Search Google Search CMSPublic All webs
Copyright &© 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback