Searches for third-generation squark production in fully hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV

Abstract

Searches for third-generation squarks in fully hadronic final states are presented using data samples corresponding to integrated luminosities of 19.4 or 19.7 fb-1, collected at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 CMS.TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC. Three mutually exclusive searches are presented, each optimized for a different decay topology. They include a multijet search requiring one fully reconstructed top quark, a dijet search requiring one or two jets originating from b quarks, and a monojet search. No excesses above the standard model expectations are seen, and limits are set on top and bottom squark production in the context of simplified models of supersymmetry.

Plots in paper

Simulation of signal and background event samples

T2tt_pennames.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Feynman diagram showing the pair production of top squarks followed by their decays via ~t → t + ~χ01.

T2bb_pennames.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Feynman diagram showing the pair production of bottom squarks followed by their decays via ~b → b + ~χ01.

T2cc_pennames.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Feynman diagram showing the pair production of top squarks followed by their flavour changing neutral current loop induced decays via ~t → c + ~χ01.

T2tb_pennames.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Feynman diagram showing the pair production of top squarks, followed by their decays via ~t → b + ~χ±1, where the chargino ~χ±1 subsequently decays via ~χ±1 → W± + ~χ01.

t-tagged stop analysis

QCD_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Distributions of m23/m3-jet versus arctan(m13/m12) for simulated QCD multijet processes events in the multijet t-tagged search. The red contours a), b), and c) limit the regions in which conditions a), b) and c) are satisfied, respectively, where a), b) and c) are decscribed in the paper.
The central dashed lines represent where the ratios involved in conditions a), b) and c) are equal to mW/mt.

TTbar_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Distributions of m23/m3-jet versus arctan(m13/m12) for simulated ttbar processes events in the multijet t-tagged search. The red contours a), b), and c) limit the regions in which conditions a), b) and c) are satisfied, respectively, where a), b) and c) are decscribed in the paper.
The central dashed lines represent where the ratios involved in conditions a), b) and c) are equal to mW/mt.

forStopPaper_MT2_comp_allINone.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

One-dimensional distributions for MT2, for the simulated processes of ttbar and three signal models in the multijet t-tagged search. The distributions are shown after applying the preselection requirements together with a cut pTmiss>200 CMS.GeV, and are normalized to equal area.

forStopPaper_met_comp_allINone.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

One-dimensional distributions for pTmiss, for the simulated processes of ttbar and three signal models in the multijet t-tagged search. The distributions are shown after applying the preselection requirements together with a cut pTmiss>200 CMS.GeV, and are normalized to equal area.

TTbar_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Two-dimensional distributions of MT3-jet versus MTR-sys for ttbar processes in the multijet t-tagged search. Events below the line are rejected. The distributions are shown after the applying the preselection requirements together with pTmiss > 200 CMS.GeV, and are normalized to equal area; the label “a.u.” means arbitrary units.

Signal_mStop500_mLSP100_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Two-dimensional distributions of MT3-jet versus MTR-sys for an example signal model with (mstop, mLSP) = (500, 0) CMS.GeV in the multijet t-tagged search. Events below the line are rejected. The distribution is shown after the applying the preselection requirements together with pTmiss > 200 CMS.GeV The label “a.u.” means arbitrary units.

Table1.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

For illustrative purposes, event yields from different MC simulated samples for each of the four exclusive search regions, defined by the multijet t-tagged analysis. All numbers are scaled to an integrated luminosity of 19.4 fb-1 , and only statistical uncertainties are shown. The signal points correspond to ~t → t + ~χ01 and are labelled as (mstop , mLSP) in units of CMS.GeV.

Table2.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Predicted SM backgrounds corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.4 fb-1 for all four of the multijet t-tagged search regions defined in the paper. Both statistical and systematic uncertainties are quoted.

b-tagged dijet analysis

pT_1b_com.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distribution of pTnon-b (see paper for definition) for the ISR search regions with Nbjets=1 in the dijet b-tagged analysis.
The selection requirement pTnon-b>250 CMS.GeV is indicated by the vertical dashed line.

pT_2b_Com.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distribution of pTnon-b (see paper for definition) for the ISR search regions with Nbjets=2 in the dijet b-tagged analysis.
The selection requirement pTnon-b>250 CMS.GeV is indicated by the vertical dashed line.

Table3.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Predicted background yields from simulation for the dijet b-tagged analysis. The results are scaled to an integrated luminosity of 19.4 fb-1. The uncertainties are statistical. The results for the ~b → b + ~χ01 signal events are labelled as (msbottom , mLSP), in CMS.GeV, and the units of the MCT variable are also CMS.GeV.

Table4.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Predicted SM backgrounds corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.4 fb-1 for the 10 dijet b-tagged search regions defined in the text, where MCT is given in units of CMS.GeV. The first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic.

Monojet analysis

charmpt.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Charm quark pT distribution for charm quarks emitted in the decay of top squarks of mass 150 CMS.GeV, for mass differences, mstop − mLSP = 10, 30, 80 CMS.GeV in the monojet analysis.

Table5.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Predicted background yields from simulation for the monojet analysis. The results are scaled to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb-1. The uncertainties are statistical. The results for the ~t → c + ~χ01 signal events are labelled as (mstop , mLSP), in CMS.GeV.

Table6.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

SM background predictions for the monojet search regions defined in the text, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb-1. For the Z(vv)+jets and W+jets terms, the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The uncertainties in the remaining backgrounds include both statistical and systematic terms.

Results

forStopPaper_dataPred_met_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The pTmiss distribution from data (black dots), and predicted backgrounds (solid filled areas) in the multijet t-tagged search, where the total (statistical and systematic) uncertainty in the background prediction is shown by the hatched band. The distributions of two representative signals (mstop, mLSP) = (500,100) and (650,50) CMS.GeV are overlaid (dashed and dotted lines respectively). The leftmost bin contains the overflow.

forStopPaper_dataPred_MT2_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The MT2 distributions from data (black dots), and predicted backgrounds (solid filled areas) in the multijet t-tagged search, where the total (statistical and systematic) uncertainty in the background prediction is shown by the hatched band. The distributions of two representative signals (mstop, mLSP) = (500,100) and (650,50) CMS.GeV are overlaid (dashed and dotted lines respectively). The leftmost bin contains the overflow.

forStopPaper_dataPred_mTcomb_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The 0.5 MT3jet + MTR-sys distributions from data (black dots), and predicted backgrounds (solid filled areas) in the multijet t-tagged search, where the total (statistical and systematic) uncertainty in the background prediction is shown by the hatched band. The distributions of two representative signals (mstop, mLSP) = (500,100) and (650,50) CMS.GeV are overlaid (dashed and dotted lines respectively). The leftmost bin contains the overflow.

MCT_1b.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of MCT in data and MC simulation for baseline selected events in the dijet b-tagged search with Nb-jets=1. Also shown (in solid lines) is the corresponding distribution for the representative signal point (msbottom, mLSP)= (300, 150). Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

MCT_2bs.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of MCT in data and MC simulation for baseline selected events in the dijet b-tagged search with Nb-jets=2. Also shown (in solid lines) is the corresponding distribution for the representative signal point (msbottom, mLSP)= (750, 50). Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

MET_1b.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of pTmiss in data and MC for baseline selected events in the dijet b-tagged search with Nb-jets=1. Also shown (in solid lines) is the corresponding distribution for the representative signal point (msbottom, mLSP)= (300, 150). Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

MET_2b.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of pTmiss in data and MC for baseline selected events in the dijet b-tagged search with Nb-jets=2. Also shown (in dashed lines) are the corresponding distribution for the representative signal point (msbottom, mLSP) = (750, 50). Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

Jet1Pt.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of the leading jet pT in the baseline monojet search region, pT(j1) > 250 CMS.GeV, for data and SM backgrounds. Background distributions are taken from simulation, and normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb-1. A representative signal distribution is also shown (in the dotted line), where mstop = 250 CMS.GeV and mLSP = 240!CMS.GeV. Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

MetLep1mu.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The distributions of the pTmiss,mu in the baseline monojet search region, pT(j1) > 250 CMS.GeV, for data and SM backgrounds. Background distributions are taken from simulation, and normalized to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb-1. A representative signal distribution is also shown (in the dotted line), where mstop = 250 CMS.GeV and mLSP = 240 CMS.GeV. Statistical uncertainties are shown for the data.

Table7.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Event yields for the different search regions defined in Sections 6.1, 7.1, and 8.1 of the paper. The multijet t-tagged search requires a combination of exclusive and inclusive bins in number of b-tagged jets (Nb jets = 1, N b jets >= 2), whereas the dijet b-tagged searches require exclusive bins (Nb jets = 1, 2); the monojet search makes no requirements on b-tagged jets (Nb jets >= 0). The SM background predictions and the yields observed in data correspond to integrated luminosities of 19.4, 19.4, and 19.7 fb-1 for the multijet t-tagged, dijet b-tagged, and monojet searches, respectively. The quoted uncertainties in the SM predictions reflect the total (statistical and systematic) uncertainties quadratically summed over all different background contributions.

Limits

T2tt_T2cc_BR100pctCONT_FullToysCONT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Expected and observed 95% CL mass exclusion limits in the (mstop, m LSP) mass plane for top-squark pair production, assuming 100% branching fraction to the decay ~t→t+~χ01, or, in the case of a highly compressed spectrum, to ~t→c+~χ01. The ±1σexp and ±1σth limit curves are also shown. The combined results from the dijet b-tagged and multijet t-tagged searches and the result from the monojet search are displayed separately. The dashed black diagonal lines mark the borders of the various kinematic regimes leading to different top squark decays as described in the text.

T2tb_br50pctCONT_FullToysCONT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the (mstop, m LSP) mass plane for top-squark pair production, assuming 50% branching fraction to the decay ~t→t+~χ01, with the remaining 50% of decays proceeding via ~t→b+~χ±1 and where the mass difference between the ~χ±1 and ~χ01 is taken to be 5 CMS.GeV. In the case of a highly compressed spectrum, 100% branching fraction to ~t→c+~χ01 is assumed. The ±1σexp and ±1σth limit curves are also shown. The combined results from the dijet b-tagged and multijet t-tagged searches and the result from the monojet search are displayed separately. The dashed black diagonal lines mark the borders of the various kinematic regimes leading to different top squark decays as described in the text.

T2tb_diffBR_FullToysCONT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Various observed 95% CL mass exclusion limit curves for top-squark pair production, assuming different branching fractions of the two top squark decays ~t→t+~χ01 and ~t→b+~χ±1. The mass difference between the ~χ±1 and ~χ01 is taken to be 5 CMS.GeV. A branching fraction (B) of 1.0 implies all decays are via ~t→t+~χ01, repeating the observed multijet t-tagged limit shown above, and conversely, B = 0.0 implies all decays proceed through ~t→b+~χ±1. The combined results from the dijet b-tagged and multijet t-tagged searches and the result from the monojet search are displayed separately. The dashed black diagonal lines mark the borders of the various kinematic regimes leading to different top squark decays as described in the text.

T2bb_combinedCONT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the (msbottom, m LSP) mass plane for bottom-squark pair production, assuming 100% branching fraction to the decay ~b→b+~χ01. The ±1σexp and ±1σth limit curves are also shown. The combined results from dijet b-tagged and monojet searches are displayed, taking the best expected limit from either search at each point in the mass plane. The black diagonal line marks the border of the kinematically allowed region.

Supplementary plots

Appendix of paper

In the first three plots below, the search region from the combined multijet t-tagged and dijet b-tagged analyses resulting in the best 95% CL expected limit is indicated by a number and shown on the colour scale in the (mstop, m LSP) mass plane. Search regions are numbered as follows.
Regions labelled 1-4 are for the multijet t-tagged analysis:
1) 1 b + 200 < pTmiss < 350; 2) 1 b + pTmiss > 350; 3) 2 b+200 < pTmiss < 350; and 4) 2 b +pTmiss > 350 CMS.GeV.
Numbers 5-14 are from the dijet b-tagged analysis.
Regions labelled 5-9 are for those search regions with 1 b tag:
5) MCT < 250; 6) 250 < MCT < 350; 7) 350 < MCT < 450; 8) MCT > 450 CMS.GeV and 9) the ISR region.
Regions labelled 10-14 are for similar regions with 2 b tags.
chnMap_BR10.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The optimal search regions are shown for the best expected limit curve in which B( ~t→t+~χ01) = 1.0 is assumed, i.e. all top squarks decay via ~t→t+~χ01.

chnMap_BR05.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The optimal search regions are shown for the expected limit curve above in which B( ~t→t+~χ01) = 0.5 is assumed.

chnMap_BR0.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The optimal search regions are shown for the best expected limit curve in which B( ~t→t+~χ01) = 0.0 is assumed, i.e. all top squarks decay via ~t→b+~χ±1.

optimal_sbottom_jet1pT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The search regions resulting in the best 95% CL expected limit for the monojet search, in the (msbottom, m LSP) mass plane for the decay ~b→b+~χ01. The optimal search region, labelled as the optimal pT bin, is shown on the colour scale along the z-axis.

optimal_stop_jet1pT.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The search regions resulting in the best 95% CL expected limit for the monojet search, in the (mstop, m LSP) mass plane for the decay ~t→c+~χ01. The optimal search region, labelled as the optimal pT bin, is shown on the colour scale along the z-axis.

best_t2bb_expLimit.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

The search resulting in the best 95% CL expected limit, for different sparticle mass hypotheses for the process ~b~b → bb ~χ0101. Bins shown in green (`1') are where the monojet analysis gives the best expected limit (along the diagonal), and those shown in red (`2') are where the dijet b-tagged analysis gives the best expected limit (the rest of the search region).

T2bb_T2bbCONT.ipg"

Download PDF Download jpg

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion limits in the (msbottom, m LSP) mass plane for bottom-squark pair production, assuming 100% branching fraction to the decay ~b→b+~χ01. The ±σexp and ±σth limit curves are also shown. Limits for the dijet b-tagged search and monojet searches are superimposed, to illustrate where in the parameter space each search dominates. The black diagonal line marks the border of the kinematically allowed region.

Additional material

forStopPaper_mTop.png"

Download PDF Download PNG

Distributions of top quark mass from reconstructed triplets in data and MC for baseline selected events in the multijet t-tagged search. The MC distributions are is scaled to the same number of events as the data. A loose top quark mass window cut of 80 CMS.GeV <mt< 270 CMS.GeV is applied. The QCD mulitjet component is ignored due to its very small contribution after the baseline selection.

T2tb_stop_0pct_fullToysCONT.png" T2tb_sbottom_0pct_fullToysCONT.png" T2tb_br0pctCONT_FullToysCONT.png"
Multijet t-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF Dijet b-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF Combined limit Download PNG Download PDF

Limits for top-squark decay with B( ~t→t+~χ01)=0.0, corresponding to all top squarks decaying via ~t → b + ~χ±1. The mass difference between the ~χ±1 and ~χ01 is taken to be 5 CMS.GeV Limits are shown for the multijet t-tagged analysis (left), the dijet b-tagged analysis (centre) and combined (right) - which corresponds to the observed limit curve shown above. The monojet limit is superimposed to be consistent with the B( ~t→t+~χ01)=0.5, B( ~t→t+~χ01)=1.0 plots shown in the paper (and above). The multijet t-tagged analysis has very little sensitivity when the top squark mass is less than the top mass, and the dijet b-tagged search dominates.

T2tb_stop_50pct_fullToysCONT.png" T2tb_sbottom_50pct_fullToysCONT.png"
Multijet t-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF Dijet b-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF

Limits for top-squark decay assuming B( ~t→t+~χ01)=0.5, corresponding to half of top quarks decaying via ~t→t+~χ01, with the remaining 50% of decays proceeding via ~t→b+~χ±1 and where the mass difference between the ~χ±1 and ~χ01 is taken to be 5 CMS.GeV. Limits are shown for the multijet t-tagged analysis (left) and the dijet b-tagged analysis (right). The combination of these limits corresponds to the B=0.5 limit curve shown above. The dijet b-tagged analysis dominates for low values of mstop, as the multijet t-tagged analysis has very little sensitivity when the top squark mass is less than the top mass. At higher values of mstop the multijet t-tagged search dominates.

T2tb_stop_100pct_fullToysCONT.png" T2tb_sbottom_100pct_fullToysCONT.png"
Multijet t-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF Dijet b-tagged analysis limit Download PNG Download PDF
Limits for top-squark decay with B( ~t→t+~χ01)=1.0, corresponding to all top squarks decaying via ~t → t + ~χ01. Limits are shown for the multijet t-tagged analysis (left), the dijet b-tagged analysis (centre) and combined (right) - which corresponds to the observed limit curve shown above. The dijet b-tagged analysis has very little sensitivity due to the jet multiplicity requirements, and the multijet t-tagged search dominates.
Table11.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Signal acceptance * efficiency, shown in %, for each step of the event selection of the monojet analysis. Two representative mass points are shown; (msbottom , mLSP) = (250,240) and (150,50) CMS.GeV for ~b→b+~χ01 and (mstop , mLSP) = (250,240) and (200,120) CMS.GeV for ~t→c+~χ01. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Table9.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Signal acceptance * efficiency, shown in %, for each step of the event selection of the dijet b-tagged analysis, for the MCT search regions. Two representative mass points are shown; (msbottom , mLSP) = (250,240) and (700,100) CMS.GeV for ~b→b+~χ01 and (mstop , mLSP) = (250,125) and (500,125) CMS.GeV for ~t→b+~χ±1. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Table10.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Signal acceptance * efficiency, shown in %, for each step of the event selection of the dijet b-tagged analysis for the ISR search regions. Two representative mass points are shown; (msbottom , mLSP) = (250,240) and (700,100) CMS.GeV for ~b→b+~χ01 and (mstop , mLSP) = (250,125) and (500,125) CMS.GeV for ~t→b+~χ±1. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Table8.jpg"

Download PDF Download JPG

Signal acceptance * efficiency, shown in %, for each step of the event selection of the t-tagged analysis.Two representative mass points are shown; (mstop , mLSP) = (250,125) and (650,25) CMS.GeV for B(~t→t+~χ01) = 0.0, 0.5 and 1.0. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

In these Tables “Event cleaning” (the first of the cuts applied to events) are the requirements used to remove events with badly measured pTmiss, beam halo, detector noise,etc.
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
JPEGjpg Jet1Pt.jpg r2 r1 manage 239.3 K 2015-03-13 - 21:58 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Jet1Pt.pdf r2 r1 manage 24.1 K 2015-03-13 - 21:34 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MCT_1b.jpg r2 r1 manage 202.7 K 2015-03-13 - 21:36 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MCT_1b.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.8 K 2015-03-13 - 21:34 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MCT_2bs.jpg r2 r1 manage 192.7 K 2015-03-15 - 22:42 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MCT_2bs.pdf r2 r1 manage 17.6 K 2015-03-15 - 22:42 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MET_1b.jpg r2 r1 manage 213.2 K 2015-03-13 - 21:58 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MET_1b.pdf r2 r1 manage 19.2 K 2015-03-15 - 23:18 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MET_2b.jpg r2 r1 manage 197.0 K 2015-03-15 - 22:15 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MET_2b.pdf r2 r1 manage 18.2 K 2015-03-15 - 22:46 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MetLep1.jpg r1 manage 230.6 K 2014-09-27 - 12:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MetLep1.pdf r1 manage 28.1 K 2014-09-27 - 12:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg MetLep1mu.jpg r1 manage 235.7 K 2015-03-13 - 21:58 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf MetLep1mu.pdf r1 manage 23.7 K 2015-03-15 - 22:51 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Monojet.jpg r1 manage 304.1 K 2014-12-15 - 11:53 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Monojet.pdf r2 r1 manage 164.8 K 2014-12-15 - 11:42 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg QCD_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.jpg r7 r6 r5 r4 r3 manage 308.6 K 2015-03-15 - 22:22 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf QCD_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.pdf r6 r5 r4 r3 r2 manage 54.3 K 2015-03-15 - 22:22 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Sbottom_MCT.jpg r2 r1 manage 407.8 K 2014-12-15 - 11:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Sbottom_MCT.pdf r2 r1 manage 212.5 K 2014-12-15 - 11:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Signal_mStop500_mLSP100_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.jpg r2 r1 manage 986.9 K 2014-09-08 - 11:50 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf Signal_mStop500_mLSP100_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.pdf r2 r1 manage 29.5 K 2014-09-08 - 11:50 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg T2bb_T2bbCONT.jpg r1 manage 219.2 K 2015-03-14 - 11:18 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2bb_T2bbCONT.pdf r1 manage 20.0 K 2015-03-14 - 11:24 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2bb_combinedCONT.jpg r2 r1 manage 215.6 K 2015-03-13 - 22:09 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2bb_combinedCONT.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.6 K 2015-03-13 - 22:09 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2bb_pennames.jpg r1 manage 99.9 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2bb_pennames.pdf r1 manage 24.9 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2cc_pennames.jpg r1 manage 98.4 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2cc_pennames.pdf r1 manage 25.0 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_br0pctCONT_FullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 32.5 K 2015-03-14 - 12:44 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_br0pctCONT_FullToysCONT.png r2 r1 manage 37.6 K 2015-03-14 - 12:37 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2tb_br50pctCONT_FullToysCONT.jpg r2 r1 manage 232.1 K 2015-03-13 - 22:15 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_br50pctCONT_FullToysCONT.pdf r2 r1 manage 22.6 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2tb_diffBR_FullToysCONT.jpg r3 r2 r1 manage 243.9 K 2015-03-13 - 22:15 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_diffBR_FullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 21.3 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2tb_pennames.jpg r1 manage 120.7 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_pennames.pdf r1 manage 35.3 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_sbottom_0pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 28.4 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_sbottom_0pct_fullToysCONT.png r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 33.9 K 2015-03-14 - 12:43 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_sbottom_100pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 15.0 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_sbottom_100pct_fullToysCONT.png r3 r2 r1 manage 19.1 K 2015-03-14 - 12:14 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_sbottom_50pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 25.3 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_sbottom_50pct_fullToysCONT.png r3 r2 r1 manage 22.0 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_stop_0pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 19.8 K 2015-03-14 - 12:14 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_stop_0pct_fullToysCONT.png r3 r2 r1 manage 20.7 K 2015-03-14 - 12:14 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_stop_100pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 20.7 K 2015-03-14 - 12:14 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_stop_100pct_fullToysCONT.png r3 r2 r1 manage 21.7 K 2015-03-14 - 12:14 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tb_stop_50pct_fullToysCONT.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 21.3 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng T2tb_stop_50pct_fullToysCONT.png r3 r2 r1 manage 22.0 K 2015-03-14 - 12:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2tt_T2cc_BR100pctCONT_FullToysCONT.jpg r2 r1 manage 221.0 K 2015-03-13 - 22:15 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tt_T2cc_BR100pctCONT_FullToysCONT.pdf r2 r1 manage 21.3 K 2015-03-13 - 22:15 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg T2tt_pennames.jpg r1 manage 97.9 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf T2tt_pennames.pdf r1 manage 24.9 K 2015-03-13 - 22:29 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg TTbar_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.jpg r5 r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 942.1 K 2015-03-14 - 11:23 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf TTbar_h2_m23overm123vsarctanm13overm12.pdf r5 r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 53.5 K 2015-03-14 - 11:24 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg TTbar_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.jpg r2 r1 manage 865.8 K 2014-09-08 - 11:52 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf TTbar_h2_mTbestTopJetvsmTbJet.pdf r2 r1 manage 30.5 K 2014-09-08 - 11:51 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg Table1.jpg r2 r1 manage 88.6 K 2015-03-13 - 18:31 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table1.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 87.0 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table10.jpg r1 manage 100.6 K 2015-03-13 - 18:16 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table10.pdf r2 r1 manage 103.0 K 2015-03-16 - 22:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table11.jpg r1 manage 150.7 K 2015-03-13 - 18:16 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table11.pdf r2 r1 manage 116.4 K 2015-03-16 - 22:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table2.jpg r2 r1 manage 105.3 K 2015-03-13 - 18:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table2.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 77.8 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table3.jpg r2 r1 manage 156.3 K 2015-03-13 - 18:12 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table3.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 138.8 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table4.jpg r2 r1 manage 96.5 K 2015-03-13 - 18:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table4.pdf r2 r1 manage 130.9 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table5.jpg r2 r1 manage 88.7 K 2015-03-13 - 18:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table5.pdf r3 r2 r1 manage 86.4 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table6.jpg r2 r1 manage 122.8 K 2015-03-13 - 18:13 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table6.pdf r2 r1 manage 117.8 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table7.jpg r1 manage 116.6 K 2015-03-13 - 18:16 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table7.pdf r2 r1 manage 109.4 K 2015-03-16 - 22:56 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table8.jpg r1 manage 133.3 K 2015-03-13 - 18:16 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table8.pdf r2 r1 manage 140.8 K 2015-03-16 - 22:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg Table9.jpg r1 manage 166.1 K 2015-03-13 - 18:16 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf Table9.pdf r2 r1 manage 161.4 K 2015-03-16 - 22:57 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg best_t2bb_expLimit.jpg r2 r1 manage 193.5 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf best_t2bb_expLimit.pdf r1 manage 9.4 K 2015-03-13 - 21:34 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg charmpt.jpg r2 r1 manage 150.8 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf charmpt.pdf r1 manage 18.1 K 2015-03-13 - 21:34 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg chnMap_BR0.jpg r2 r1 manage 120.2 K 2014-12-12 - 16:15 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf chnMap_BR0.pdf r1 manage 43.9 K 2014-12-12 - 15:56 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg chnMap_BR05.jpg r2 r1 manage 113.5 K 2014-12-12 - 16:16 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf chnMap_BR05.pdf r1 manage 26.3 K 2014-12-12 - 15:56 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg chnMap_BR10.jpg r2 r1 manage 104.6 K 2014-12-12 - 16:12 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf chnMap_BR10.pdf r1 manage 25.3 K 2014-12-12 - 15:56 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg chnMap_BR10_CMS.jpg r1 manage 305.2 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf chnMap_BR10_CMS.pdf r1 manage 25.3 K 2015-03-13 - 21:34 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg forStopPaper_MT2_comp_allINone.jpg r3 r2 r1 manage 155.5 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_MT2_comp_allINone.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.4 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg forStopPaper_dataPred_MT2_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 240.5 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_dataPred_MT2_divideBinWidth_noLogy.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 17.4 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PNGpng forStopPaper_dataPred_MT2_divideBinWidth_noLogy.png r1 manage 290.1 K 2014-10-30 - 15:30 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg forStopPaper_dataPred_mTcomb_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 264.8 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_dataPred_mTcomb_divideBinWidth_noLogy.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 19.4 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg forStopPaper_dataPred_met_divideBinWidth_noLogy.jpg r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 247.7 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_dataPred_met_divideBinWidth_noLogy.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 16.1 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
C source code filec forStopPaper_mTop.C r2 r1 manage 21.9 K 2015-03-03 - 18:42 HongxuanLiu  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_mTop.pdf r2 r1 manage 15.9 K 2015-03-03 - 18:42 HongxuanLiu  
PNGpng forStopPaper_mTop.png r2 r1 manage 28.9 K 2015-03-03 - 18:42 HongxuanLiu  
JPEGjpg forStopPaper_met_comp_allINone.jpg r3 r2 r1 manage 152.8 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf forStopPaper_met_comp_allINone.pdf r2 r1 manage 14.6 K 2015-03-15 - 23:07 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg optimal_sbottom_jet1pT.jpg r1 manage 310.6 K 2014-12-12 - 14:14 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf optimal_sbottom_jet1pT.pdf r1 manage 8.7 K 2014-12-12 - 14:14 RobynLucas  
JPEGjpg optimal_stop_jet1pT.jpg r1 manage 111.5 K 2014-12-12 - 14:14 RobynLucas  
PDFpdf optimal_stop_jet1pT.pdf r2 r1 manage 8.4 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg pT_1b_com.jpg r1 manage 148.5 K 2015-03-13 - 21:36 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf pT_1b_com.pdf r1 manage 17.0 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf pT_2b.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2014-12-15 - 15:38 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
JPEGjpg pT_2b_com.jpg r1 manage 142.3 K 2015-03-13 - 21:36 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
PDFpdf pT_2b_com.pdf r1 manage 16.9 K 2015-03-13 - 21:35 BatoolSafarzadehSamani  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r67 < r66 < r65 < r64 < r63 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r67 - 2015-03-17 - FilipMoortgat
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2018 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback