TWiki> CMSPublic Web>SWGuide>SWGuideCalAli>SWGuideTrackAlignment>SWGuideAlignmentConstants (2020-05-22, MuhammadAnsarIqbal) EditAttachPDF

CMS Tracker Alignment DB Object Tags for Run-2

Description: History and description of alignment/surface deformation/APE tags in Run-2. Run-1 alignment constants are documented here.

Contacts

Current multi-IOV data tags

Starting from 80X_dataRun2_Express_v9 and 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v9, it has been introduced new Tracker Alignment tag (copy of the existing one) for the purpose of switching on the SiPixelAli PCL for both Express and Prompt.

Summary table

stream TrackerAlignmentRcd TrackerSurfaceDeformationRcd TrackerAlignmentErrorExtendedRcd
HLT TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v0_hl TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_hlt TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_hlt_IOVs
Express TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs
Prompt TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs
Offline TrackerAlignment_v29_offline TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v13_offline TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v16_offline_IOVs

TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v0_hlt

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object comment
246978 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
248618 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Wrong upload to production, no data taken, reverted back to TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation till validation
248642 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
251100 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Module-level alignment of pixel detector only with 0T data of Run2015A AlCa/DB HN announcement
251607 TrackerAlignment_Run2015B_PseudoPCL_v2 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T AlCa/DB HN announcement
256715 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v0 inconsistent conditions derived from Run2015C data, uploaded by mistake (affected data corrected in prompt reconstruction)
256746 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions derived from Run2015B data
256766 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v0 inconsistent conditions derived from Run2015C data but centrally validated, therefore till further validation used in HLT. Express used the TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions. Difference to express
270856 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET2016 CRUZET alignment for 2016 the alignment constants starting from IOV 260335 of 2015-EOY_v1_RunD
272497 TrackerAlignment_Run2016A_PseudoPCL_v1 Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL workflow on run 272011 and conditions in GT 80X_dataRun2_Express_v6 (CRUZET alignment)
276251 no corresponding Tag created updated module level tracker alignment and APE from 2016B AlCa/DB HN announcement
276517 TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_276363 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T after magnet cycle on 02.07.2016 AlCa/DB HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignment_ReReco2016BtoG Tracker alignment updated from September ReReco campaign Alca/DB HN announcement
285456   Update tracker alignment with conditions derived after last magnet ramp after 2016 end of pp-data taking (run 285090) for p-Pb run
290550 TrackerAlignment_PreCRUZET2017_v1 Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector and last IOV of EOY16 alignment for strips AlCa/DB HN announcement
292615 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v1 First HL alignment with CRUZET17 data (still w/o BPX) Alca/DB HN announcement
294604 TrackerAlignment_CRAFT17_v0 New tracker alignment derived from CRUZET and CRAFT 2017 data AlCa/DB HN announcement
295502 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v0 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions and rotations), leading to an improved local resolution and using the collision data of the runs 295209+295210 as well as CRAFT (private rereco) AlCa/DB HN announcement
296819 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v1 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions and rotations), leading to an improved local resolution in BPX layer1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
297618 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v5 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions, rotations, surfaces), consistent with templates v3 for new bias voltage in layer 1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
298902 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v6 synchronisation with express/prompt
299924 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 syncrhonisation with express/prompt HN announcement
300703 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v10 The new conditions are necessary for full consistency with updates in the pixel local-reco conditions and BPX layer 2 timing settings, leading to improved performance AlCa/DB HN announcement
302581 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v11 Consistent with new templates and new HV HN announcement
303856   To be consistent with the PCL-produced payload post-TS2 on express/prompt HN announcement.
304653 TrackerAlignment_forPrompt2017_v1 Update of Tracker alignment and APEs corresponding to V6 pixel gain and other local reco conditions HN announcement.
306532 TrackerAlignment_lastIOV_v2ReReco2017 Full track validation of Tracker alignment and surface HN announcement.
314163 TrackerAlignment_StartUp2018_v2 New tracker alignment and APE (start-up 2018) HN announcement.
316006 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v1_express_315648 PCL alignment HN announcement.
317393 TrackerAlignment_FirstCollisions2018_v3 New tracker alignment and APE from first collisions 2018 HN announcement.
320399 TrackerAlignment_PreMD2_v1 New tracker alignment during MD2 (machine developing) HN announcement.
320924 TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 New tracker alignment the post-annealing payload HN announcement.
321048 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express_off Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 321007 also significantly improved for HLT HN announcement.
321496 TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v3 New tracker alignment the post-annealing payload to improve further on top of TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 HN announcement.
321496 TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v3 New tracker alignment the post-annealing payload to improve further on top of TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 HN announcement.
323230 TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_450V_v1 New tracker alignment for PreMD3 with 450V condition HN announcement.
326083 TrackerAlignment_PreMD4_v1 New tracker alignment PreMD4 for HI data taking HN announcement.
326457 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v0_hlt Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 326381 for HI data taking HN announcement.
326978 TrackerAlignment_HI2018_v1 New tracker alignment for HI data taking HN announcement.

TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express

Detailed information at CondDB.

Note This is a copied and updated version of tag TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v0_express.

since run object comment
275635 TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_275376 Tracker alignment updated with the latest pixel high-level alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
276319   Tracker alignment updated with the latest pixel high-level alignment which corrects for small but significant movements induced by the magnet cycle AlCa/DB HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignment_ReReco2016BtoG Tracker alignment updated from September ReReco campaign Alca/DB HN announcement
290550 TrackerAlignment_PreCRUZET2017_v1 Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector and last IOV of EOY16 alignment for strips AlCa/DB HN announcement
292200 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v1 First HL strips + FPX alignment with CRUZET17 data (no BPX yet, stays at IDEAL). Cures in particular 3mm mis-alignment of FPX -z cylinder. AlCa/DB HN announcement
294604 TrackerAlignment_CRAFT17_v0 New tracker alignment derived from CRUZET and CRAFT 2017 data AlCa/DB HN announcement
295380 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v0 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions and rotations), leading to an improved local resolution and using the collision data of the runs 295209+295210 as well as CRAFT (private rereco) AlCa/DB HN announcement
295702 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v1 Updates the pixel module-level alignment on Run 295463 (positions and rotations), leading to an improved local resolution in BPX layer1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
297104 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v2 Updates the pixel module-level alignment on Run 296786 (positions and rotations), leading to an improved local resolution in BPX layer1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
297417 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v5 Updates the pixel module-level alignment on Run 297292 (positions, rotations, surfaces), consistent with templates v3 for new bias voltage in layer 1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
298757 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v6 Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, runs 298653, 298671, 298678, including cosmics runs 298647/48/51/57/58/61/68. AlCa/DB HN announcement
298809 TrackerAlignment_from06Jul2017ReReco_v0 Pixel ML alignment on 06Jul2017ReReco of 297664+297671 (updated VCal calibration, PH, gain calibration) AlCa/DB HN announcement
299228 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v7 Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data 298996 (post TS1 with new Vcal calibration). Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v4. AlCa/DB HN announcement
299685 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 Pixel ML alignment based on Run 299592-97+299614-617. AlCa/DB HN announcement
300662 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v10 The new conditions are necessary for full consistency with updates in the pixel local-reco conditions and BPX layer 2 timing settings, leading to improved performance AlCa/DB HN announcement
302539 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v11 Consistent with new templates and new HV HN announcement
303796   started automatic PCL-produced payload post-TS2 writing to production tags HN announcement
304653 TrackerAlignment_forPrompt2017_v1 Update of Tracker alignment and APEs corresponding to V6 pixel gain and other local reco conditions HN announcement.
306532 TrackerAlignment_lastIOV_v2ReReco2017 Full track validation of Tracker alignment and surface HN announcement.
314163 TrackerAlignment_StartUp2018_v2 New tracker alignment and APE (start-up 2018) HN announcement.
316006 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v1_express_315648 PCL alignment HN announcement.
317393 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v1_express_315648 New tracker alignment and APE from first collisions 2018 HN announcement.
317393 TrackerAlignment_FirstCollisions2018_v3 New tracker alignment and APE from first collisions 2018 HN announcement.
320399 TrackerAlignment_PreMD2_v1 New tracker alignment during MD2 (machine developing) HN announcement.
320812 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express_off Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 320757 before green light of TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 object arrived HN announcement.
320924,320997 TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 New tracker alignment the post-annealing payload HN announcement. (uploaded twice due to some mistake by AlCa)
321013 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express_off Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 321007 due to mistake by AlCa forgotten to switch on PCL HN announcement.
321496 TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v3 New tracker alignment the post-annealing payload to improve further on top of TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2 HN announcement.
323230 TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_450V_v1 New tracker alignment for PreMD3 with 450V condition HN announcement.
323462   Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 323419 due to rotations are larger than the tolerances for automatic deployment. HN announcement.
323643 TrackerAlignment_PostMD3_v1 New tracker alignment for PostMD3 consistent with v11 pixel templates HN announcement.
326083 TrackerAlignment_PreMD4_v1 New tracker alignment PreMD4 for HI data taking HN announcement.
326457 TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express Manually upload TkAl from PCL Run 326381 for HI data taking HN announcement.
326978 TrackerAlignment_HI2018_v1 New tracker alignment for HI data taking HN announcement.

Note: automatic uploading mode is now activated and can be monitored from here and here. The table above only presented IOVs from manual uploads (automatic PCL uploads are skipped).

TrackerAlignment_v29_offline

  • past from TrackerAlignment_v28_offline
  • TrackerAlignment_2018_ultralegacy_lowPU_v1:             318939-
  • TrackerAlignment_2018_ultralegacy_VdM_v1:                318982-
  • bfa1358c16281152977a1035e07897b3d720df41:           319337-
  • TrackerAlignment_2018_ultralegacy_lowPU_v1:             319460-
  • 889dde949a39eb76d1382f6966a4d46aeb81f1cd:           319503-   
  • future from TrackerAlignment_v28_offline

TrackerAlignment_v28_offline

TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_hlt

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object comment
184572   Run-I conditions
246993 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
270856 TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD CRUZET2016 AlCa/DB HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformation_ReReco2016BtoG September ReReco2016 Annoucement
284121 TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformation_ReReco2016BtoG_v1 Corrected payload of September campaign (update after pp-runs but before pA-runs) HN announcement
290550 TrackerSurfaceDeformations_PreCRUZET2017_v1 Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector and last IOV of EOY16 alignment for strips AlCa/DB HN announcement
297618 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v5 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions, rotations, surfaces), consistent with templates v3 for new bias voltage in layer 1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
298901 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v6 synchronisation with express/prompt
299924 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 synchronisation with express/prompt HN announcement

TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object comment
184572   Run-I conditions
237545    
246993 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
270856 TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD CRUZET2016 AlCa/DB HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformation_ReReco2016BtoG September ReReco2016 Annoucement -> BAD PAYLOAD
283024 TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformation_ReReco2016BtoG_v1 Corrected payload of September campaign HN announcement
290550 TrackerSurfaceDeformations_PreCRUZET2017_v1 Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector and last IOV of EOY16 alignment for strips AlCa/DB HN announcement
297417 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v5 Updates the pixel module-level alignment (positions, rotations, surfaces), consistent with templates v3 for new bias voltage in layer 1 AlCa/DB HN announcement
298757 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v6 Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, runs 298653, 298671, 298678, including cosmics runs 298647/48/51/57/58/61/68. AlCa/DB HN announcement
299685 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 Pixel ML alignment based on Run 299592-97+299614-617. AlCa/DB HN announcement

TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_prompt

Detailed information at CondDB.

Note we have currently (24.07.2017) different tags in prompt and express to allow faster reaction to changing conditions during the commissioning period. This is a simply copied version of tag TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express until Run 298757.

since run object comment
299443 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 Pixel ML alignment based on Run 299592-97+299614-617. AlCa/DB HN announcement

TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v13_offline

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_hlt_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

(first runs missing)

since run object comment
246994 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel20-disks40 AlCa/DB HN announcement
253953 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel10-disks20 reduced APE for 3.8T operation AlCa/DB HN announcement
254588 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel20-disks40 enlarged APE for 0T operation. Kept also for last 3.8T runs of 2015C since pixel has moved due to magnet cycles during era. AlCa/DB HN announcement
256715 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel10-disks20 reduced APE for 3.8T operation AlCa/DB HN announcement
270856 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 enlarged APE: 100mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC AlCa/DB HN announcement
272788 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_Run2016B reduced APE "10/20" AlCa/DB HN announcement
276251 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_MP_Run2016B APE of the May16 alignment, employed after ICHEP dataset closing HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2016BtoG rereco 2016 campaign Annoucement; APEs presented at AlCa/DB meeting, Jan 09, 2017, values reported slides 59ff (curve labelled "sm1959 (APE per IOV)")
289671 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 enlarged APE for CRUZET17 data taking with only strips detector: 100mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. Note that pixel is still the phase0 format. It will be updated to phase1 once interdependency tests are done with the first, strips-only CRUZET17 data. AlCa/DB HN announcement
290550 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX500_FPIX500_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APE for CRUZET data taking 500 mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20 mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector AlCa/DB HN announcement
294611 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX100_FPIX100_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APE for CRAFT data taking 100 mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20 mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. AlCa/DB HN announcement
297618 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 APE (in mum) payload based on the last measuerement with 296786: L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before) AlCa/DB HN announcement
298647 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v3 Moderately increased pixel APE to accomodate possible displacement by B-field ramp during TS1. APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in BPX 20, FPX 40; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before). AlCa/DB HN announcement
298901 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 back to previous conditions
304653 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v5 Update of Tracker alignment and APEs corresponding to V6 pixel gain and other local reco conditions HN announcement.
310617 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX500_FPIX500_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APEs for CRUZET2018 which is the same as the one for 2016 as presented in AlCa/DB meeting and AlCa/DB HN announcement
314163 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp2018_v2 New tracker alignment and APE (start-up 2018) HN announcement.
317393 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_FirstCollisions2018_v1 New tracker alignment and APE from first collisions 2018 HN announcement.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

(first runs missing)

since run object comment
236373    
246994 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel20-disks40 AlCa/DB HN announcement
253953 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel10-disks20 reduced APE for 3.8T operation AlCa/DB HN announcement
254588 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel20-disks40 enlarged APE for 0T operation. Kept also for last 3.8T runs of 2015C since pixel has moved due to magnet cycles during era. AlCa/DB HN announcement
256715 ape_DESRUN2_74_V4_barrel10-disks20 reduced APE for 3.8T operation AlCa/DB HN announcement
270856 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 enlarged APE: 100mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC AlCa/DB HN announcement
272788 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_Run2016B reduced APE "10/20" AlCa/DB HN announcement
276812 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_MP_Run2016B APE of the May16 alignment, employed after ICHEP dataset closing HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2016BtoG rereco 2016 campaign Annoucement; APEs presented at AlCa/DB meeting, Jan 09, 2017, values reported slides 59ff (curve labelled "sm1959 (APE per IOV)")
289671 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 enlarged APE for CRUZET17 data taking with only strips detector: 100mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. Note that pixel is still the phase0 format. It will be updated to phase1 once interdependency tests are done with the first, strips-only CRUZET17 data. AlCa/DB HN announcement
290550 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX500_FPIX500_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APE for CRUZET data taking 500 mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20 mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. Conditions changed consistently to phase-I pixel detector AlCa/DB HN announcement
294611 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX100_FPIX100_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APE for CRAFT data taking 100 mum for BPIX and FPIX, 20 mum for TIB and TOB, 40mum for TID and TEC. AlCa/DB HN announcement
297104 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v1 APE payload based on the last measuerement with 296463, keeping 100mum in L1: L1 xyz: 100mum (as before); L2 y: 40mum; L2 xz; L3-L4 xyz FPX xyz: 10mum; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before) AlCa/DB HN announcement
297417 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 APE (in mum) payload based on the last measuerement with 296786: L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before) AlCa/DB HN announcement
298450 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v3 Moderately increased pixel APE to accomodate possible displacement by B-field ramp during TS1. APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in BPX 20, FPX 40; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before). AlCa/DB HN announcement
298759 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 APE (in mum) payload based on the last measuerement with 296786: L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before) AlCa/DB HN announcement
304653 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v5 Update of Tracker alignment and APEs corresponding to V6 pixel gain and other local reco conditions HN announcement.
310617 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX500_FPIX500_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 APEs for CRUZET2018 which is the same as the one for 2016 as presented in AlCa/DB meeting and AlCa/DB HN announcement
314163 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp2018_v2 New tracker alignment and APE (start-up 2018) HN announcement.
317393 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_FirstCollisions2018_v1 New tracker alignment and APE from first collisions 2018 HN announcement.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_prompt_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

Note we have currently (24.07.2017) different tags in prompt and express to allow faster reaction to changing conditions during the commissioning period. This is a simply copied version of tag TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs until Run 298759.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v16_offline_IOVs

  • past from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v15_offline_IOVs
  • TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2018_ultralegacy_lowPU_v1:    318939-319336
  • c7b90ae711fcdaab3122a8468cfd4d551c4f46f8:                             319337-319459
  • TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2018_ultralegacy_lowPU_v1:    319460-319502
  • 9060d7d015c9533bd7ad413cb3f307b7c2c5f5da:                           319503
  • future from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v15_offline_IOVs

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v15_offline_IOVs

Pseudo-PCL Tags

Since run 272011, the PCL alignment is running in test mode at T0. Results are written to the following tags at the preparation DB:

Past tags

Past multi-IOV data tags summary table

stream TrackerAlignmentRcd TrackerSurfaceDeformationRcd TrackerAlignmentErrorExtendedRcd
HLT TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_hlt TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_hlt TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_hlt_IOVs
Express TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_express TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs
Prompt1) TrackerAlignment_prompt TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs
Remarks:
  1. This was split from the express tag, see TrackerAlignment_prompt for details

Tags for data reprocessing

Ultra-Legacy (all years)

2017 Re-Reco

2016 Legacy

2016 ReReco campaign (after correction of surface deformations)

Payload Information

TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v1_express

Diverts the alignment objects produced by the pixelAli at PCL to the this tag, which is not consumed by prompt; as agreed with tracker DPG for the early phases of 2017 running.

Detail information at AlCa/DB HN announcement

TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_prompt

Detailed information at CondDB.

Note we have currently (24.07.2017) different tags in prompt and express to allow faster reaction to changing conditions during the commissioning period. This is a simply copied version of tag TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express until Run 299228.

since run object comment
298809 TrackerAlignment_from06Jul2017ReReco_v0 Pixel ML alignment on 06Jul2017ReReco of 297664+297671 (updated VCal calibration, PH, gain calibration) AlCa/DB HN announcement
299228 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v7 Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data 298996 (post TS1 with new Vcal calibration). Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v4. AlCa/DB HN announcement
299443 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 Pixel ML alignment based on Run 299592-97+299614-617. AlCa/DB HN announcement
300558 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v10 The new conditions are necessary for full consistency with updates in the pixel local-reco conditions and BPX layer 2 timing settings, leading to improved performance AlCa/DB HN announcement
302539 TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v11 Consistent with new templates and new HV HN announcement

TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_hlt (superseded)

Detailed information at CondDB.

Typically synchronized with TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_express.

since run object comment
246978 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
248618 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Wrong upload to production, no data taken, reverted back to TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation till validation
248642 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
251100 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Module-level alignment of pixel detector only with 0T data of Run2015A AlCa/DB HN announcement
251607 TrackerAlignment_Run2015B_PseudoPCL_v2 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T AlCa/DB HN announcement
256715 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v0 inconsistent conditions derived from Run2015C data, uploaded by mistake (affected data corrected in prompt reconstruction)
256746 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions derived from Run2015B data
256766 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v0 inconsistent conditions derived from Run2015C data but centrally validated, therefore till further validation used in HLT. Express used the TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions. Difference to express
270856 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET2016 CRUZET alignment for 2016 the alignment constants starting from IOV 260335 of 2015-EOY_v1_RunD
272497 TrackerAlignment_Run2016A_PseudoPCL_v1 Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL workflow on run 272011 and conditions in GT 80X_dataRun2_Express_v6 (CRUZET alignment)
276251   updated module level tracker alignment and APE from 2016B AlCa/DB HN announcement
276517 TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_276363 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T after magnet cycle on 02.07.2016 AlCa/DB HN announcement
281466 TrackerAlignment_ReReco2016BtoG Tracker alignment updated from September ReReco campaign Alca/DB HN announcement
271866 TrackerAlignment_EOY16_sm1959 Tracker alignment containing 35 IOVs from EOY16 campaign (after new IOVs redefinition) Alca/DB HN announcement

TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_express (superseded)

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object comment
     
     
246978 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
248618 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Wrong upload to production, no data taken, reverted back to TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation till validation
248642 TrackerAlignment_v1_hltvalidation CRUZET+CRAFT alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
251100 TrackerAlignment_v2_hltvalidation Module-level alignment of pixel detector only with 0T data of Run2015A
251607 [SWGuideAlignmentConstantsRun2015[#TrackerAlignment_Run2015B_Pseudo][TrackerAlignment_Run2015B_PseudoPCL_v2]] pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T AlCa/DB HN announcement
256715 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v0 inconsistent conditions derived from Run2015C data, uploaded by mistake (affected data corrected in prompt reconstruction)
256746 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions derived from Run2015B data
257826 TrackerAlignment_Run2015D_PseudoPCL_v0 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T with early Run2015D data AlCa/DB HN announcement
262922 TrackerAlignment_ppRef2015_hltvalidation pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T with early Run2015E data AlCa/DB HN announcement
270856 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET2016 CRUZET 2016 alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
272497 TrackerAlignment_Run2016A_PseudoPCL_v1 Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL AlCa/DB HN announcement

TrackerAlignment_prompt (superseded)

Detailed information at CondDB.

This is a new tag that was created by merging the content of the old TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_prompt, which was in use (apparently) up to run 197571, and then inserting all the IOVs from TrackerAlignment_2009_v1_express that were included recently in all the express and prompt GTs.

It is included in the GT for Prompt as of 74X_dataRun2_Prompt_v2.

since run object comment
251607 TrackerAlignment_Run2015B_Pseudo pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T AlCa/DB HN announcement
256709 TrackerAlignment_for_Run2015D_v1 conditions derived from Run2015B data (the payload with the younger time stamp)
257826 TrackerAlignment_Run2015D_PseudoPCL_v0 pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T with early Run2015D data AlCa/DB HN announcement
262922 TrackerAlignment_ppRef2015_hltvalidation pseudo-PCL alignment at 3.8T with early Run2015E data AlCa/DB HN announcement
270385 TrackerAlignment_CRUZET2016 CRUZET 2016 alignment AlCa/DB HN announcement
272214 TrackerAlignment_Run2016A_PseudoPCL_v1 Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL AlCa/DB HN announcement
-->

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v10_offline_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v9_offline_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object content
1 -- A copy of 43 IOVs from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v6_offline_IOVs
290101 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX50_FPIX50_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 50mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
294034 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v2 TIB/TOB: 5, TID/TEC: 10, corresponding to alignment IOV 1-4: L1x:10, L1y: 15, L2y: 10, others: 5
298653 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v2 TIB/TOB: 5, TID/TEC: 10, corresponding to alignment IOV 5-6: L1x: 10, L1y: 30, L2y: 20, others:5
299443 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v2 TIB/TOB: 5, TID/TEC: 10, corresponding to alignment IOV 7-12: L1x: 5, L1y: 10, L2y: 10, others: 5
Note private tag contains only 2017 payload is also created under TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v2.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v8_offline_IOVs

Remake of offline tag created for 2017 Re-reco according to AlCa/DB Announcement. This tag is the updated version of TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v7_offline_IOVs which contains one more payload.

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object content
1 -- A copy of 43 IOVs from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v6_offline_IOVs
290101 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX50_FPIX50_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 50mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
297020 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 APE (in mum) payload based on the last measuerement with 296786: L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before)
299337 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v4 APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 40, L2yz20, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 10mum; TID, TEC xyz: 20mum
Note private tag contains only 2017 payload is also created under TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v1.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v7_offline_IOVs

Offline tag created for 2017 Re-reco according to AlCa/DB Announcement.

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run object content
1 -- A copy of 43 IOVs from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v6_offline_IOVs
290101 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX50_FPIX50_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 50mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
297020 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v4 APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 40, L2yz20, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 10mum; TID, TEC xyz: 20mum
Note private tag contains only 2017 payload is also created under TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2017_v0.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v6_offline_IOVs

Detailed information at CondDB.

since run objectSorted ascending content
1 -- Run-I
157865 -- Run-I
250933 TrackerAlignmentErrorExtended_Run2Startup_v0_mc Start of 2015 data taking? This would correspond to 20/40
250985 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2015-EOY_v1 Run2015B with APEs on mp1896 object
253986 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2015-EOY_v1 Run2015C with APEs on hp1527 object
256547 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2015-EOY_v1 Run2015D with APEs on mp1885 object
238341 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_barrel20_endcap40 CRAFT15
266150 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 CRAFT16, 100/20/40 APEs
271866 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_EOY16_sm1959 APE for 35 IOVs (final IOV is 284038) from EOY16

Details of Alignment, APE and Surface Deformation

MC Objects

MC conditions for 2021, 2023 and 2024

Tags at conddb:

Internal validations can be found here. The announcement on HN is here.

Ultra legacy MC conditions for 2018

Tags at conddb:

Internal validations can be found here. The announcement on HN is here.

TrackerAlignment _MC2018_v2

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_MC2018_v2

  • mp3027
  • SG : 104X_upgrade2018_realistic_pixelCand_v1

Details of the object can be found here. The announcement on HN is here.

TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacymc_v2

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacymc_v2

Corresponding APEs: TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacymc_v2

  • /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/data/commonValidation/CMSSW_10_5_0_NumberOfHitsperModule/src/Alignment/MCscenarioUL2017/move_FPIX_realistic_30plus30minus.db
  • SG : Gaussian smearing of design geometry
  • Alignment trying to mimic data UL17 campaign
  • APEs also investigated to match the data
  • Adding a systematic misalignment by hand in the FPIXes to better describe the IP vs eta in data

Internal validation is here.

TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacymc_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacymc_v1

Corresponding APEs: TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacymc_v1

  • mp3149
  • SG : GT 105X_mc2017_realistic_v5

Internal validation is here.

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_realistic_v3

Tags:

Description:

  • use step 1 from 2018 scenario (done with 100X samples) as new scenario for 2017, fixing most WMs
  • internal validation: link
  • object: mp2813 jobm6

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_realistic_v2 and TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformations _Upgrade2017_realistic_v0 and TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors _Upgrade2017_realistic_v2

For MC V2 production campaign after bug fixed and performance optimization in TIB as announced on AlCa/DB HN.

Tags:

Ultra legacy MC conditions for 2016

Tags at conddb:

Description:

  • Alignment trying to mimic data UL16 campaign
  • APEs taken from MC object
  • Additional smearing added for some of the substructures on top of MP object (mp3301), to better describe the performance in data

Internal validations can be found here (MCscenario2016_statusUL_2.pdf). The announcement on HN is here.

MC Misalignment Scenarios

9 pure weak modes from starting geometry 103X_upgrade2018_design_v4:

Random Gaussian movement of the full tracker:

Random movement of one of the subdetectors:

TrackerAlignment _MC2018_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_MC2018_v1

Details of the object can be found here. The announcement on HN is here.

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_realistic_v3

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_realistic_v3

MC Scenarios

9 Misaligments (pure weak modes) for MuAl studies as described in Sandra's presentation and Twiki.

Run 2018

Van der Meer runs

  • Description: Ultra legacy reprocessing of some Van der Meer scan runs in 2018. This alignment object starts from the UL alignment and performs a PCL-like alignment using Zero Bias tracks.
  • Alignment: mp3305
  • Alignment tag: TrackerAlignment_2018_ultralegacy_VdM_v1
  • APE tag: No dedicated tag (TrackerAlignment_2018_ultralegacy_lowPU_v1 is fine)

Low PU runs

Special high voltage runs

Three special runs (317475, 317478 and 317484) at high voltage during 2018.

Their alignment conditions are:

Internal validations can be found here and the hn announcement is here.

These alignment conditions have been combined with 2017 and 2018 UL to form offline tags:

The hn announcement can be found here.

2018 Ultra Legacy conditions

Tags at conddb:

Starting run: 314472

As the name suggests, 2018_ultralegacy only contains the 2018 part.

Internal validation is here

TrackerAlignment_HI2018_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_HI2018_v1.

  • hp2803
  • pixel ML alignment to be used for the HI data-taking

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment_PreMD4_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PreMD4_v1.

  • mp2910 (jobm)
  • a module-level alignment of the pixel detector, which goes together with new pixel templates to be used for the HI data-taking
  • including the latest pixel templates: SiPixelTemplateDBObject_phase1_38T_2018_v12

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment _PostMD3_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v1.

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_450V_v1 and TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_400V_v1 (temporary)

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_450V_v1, TrackerAlignment_PreMD3_400V_v1

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment _v24_offline

For Summer18 ReReco of the eras ABC(D)

TrackerAlignment _SummerCamp2018_testRunB and TrackerAlignment _SummerCamp2018_testRunC

Single-IOV tags for testing purposes of dependent workflows in ReRecoABC campaign, derived on representative runs in eras B and C:

The payloads are the alignment objects for the two above IOVs derived in mp2848/jobm3:

  • 12 IOV strip HL mechanical and pixel ladder/blades alignment
  • pixel and strips in addition aligned at sensor level
Details are provided at Tracker Alignment Meeting, August 21, 2018.

TrackerAlignment _PostMD2_v3

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v3.

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment _PostMD2_v2

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PostMD2_v2.

  • mp2830
  • PCL-like alignment with 320673

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment _PreMD2_v1

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_PreMD2_v1.

  • mp2806
  • pixel ML + strip fixed
  • pre-MD2 object

Details of the object and validation

TrackerAlignment _FirstCollisions2018_v3

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_FirstCollisions2018_v3.

The first module-level alignment of the year (at least in pixel and inner strip). There is no update of the surface deformations.

Details of the object and validation

  • mp2765
  • Starting geometry : CRUZET/CRAFT (mp2705)
  • Announcement to AlCa /DB for validation here.

TrackerAlignment _CRUZET_CRAFT_2018_v1 and TrackerAlignment _StartUp2018_v2

Tag at CondDB : TrackerAlignment_CRUZET_CRAFT_2018_v1, TrackerAlignment_StartUp2018_v2

This object contains two IOVs, one for CRUZET starting from 311450 and one for CRAFT starting from 313041. The CRAFT IOV is interested for production GT which is uploaded alone under tag "TrackerAlignment_StartUp2018_v2".

Details of the object and validation

  • The alignment was done in several iterations: express GT --> mp2688 (HL) --> mp2693_jobm2 (ladder in the pixels) --> sm2515 (ladder in the pixels, best CRUZET alignment) --> mp2700 (ladder in the pixels, best CRAFT alignment)
  • Then we started a multiIOV alignment, with corrections for the LA using the procedure from Gregor, starting from sm2515 for CRUZET and mp2700 for CRAFT:
  • mp2702 (HL) --> mp2705 (ML in the pixels)
  • Announcement to AlCa /DB for validation here.

+ APE Objects

The following APE scenarios were created with fixed APE (given in mum in the tag name) and are valid for the Phase-I detector.

APE PROD Objects:

date object (DB) description
2018-04-11 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp2018_v2 APE BPIX and FPX: 10, TIB: 10 TOB: 10 TID:15 and TEC we have 15 um in R1-3, 20 in R4-5, 30 in R6, and 40 in R7 for TrackerAlignment _StartUp2018_v2
2018-04-11 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX10_FPIX10_TIB10_TOB10_TID15_TEC15 APE BPIX and FPX: 10, TIB: 10 TOB: 10 TID and TEC; 15 for TrackerAlignment _StartUp2018_v2
2018-05-25 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_FirstCollisions2018_v1 APE for TrackerAlignment _FirstCollisions2018_v3
2018-09-05 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v10_offline_IOVs APEs contain TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v9_offline_IOVs with new APEs corresponding to TrackerAlignment_v24_offline

Custom GT as starting geometry

custom GT description
102X_dataRun2_TkAlSummerCamp_SG_v4 Different from the main GT can be found here
102X_dataRun2_TkAlSummerCamp_SG_v3 Different from the main GT can be found here
102X_dataRun2_TkAlSummerCamp_SG_v2 Different from the main GT can be found here
102X_dataRun2_TkAlSummerCamp_SG Different from the main GT can be found here

Run 2017

2017 Ultra Legacy conditions

  • Conditions: Single IOV tags TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacy_v1 + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2017_ultralegacy_v1 + TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacy_v2 packaged into multi-IOV tags TrackerAlignment_v25_offline + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v12_offline + TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v12_offline_IOVs
  • Internal validation + Fine APE validation
  • AlCaDB HN and TK alignment HN + Follow up message
  • Local alignment object is here: /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/MP/MPproduction/um0003/jobData/jobm/um0003.db
  • As the naming suggests, 2017_ultralegacy contain only the 2017 part (from run 297049)
  • AlCaDB HN
  • Internal validation 

TrackerAlignment_v25_offline contains
 - the past from TrackerAlignment_v23_offline
 - TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacy_v1 from 297049
 - and TrackerAlignment_v24_offline from 313041

TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v12_offline contains
 - the past from TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v11_offline
 - TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2017_ultralegacy_v1 from 297049
 - and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v11_offline from 313041

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v12_offline_IOVs contains
 - the past from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v9_offline_IOVs
 - TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacy_v2 from 297049
 - and TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v10_offline_IOVs from 313041

  • Conditions: TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacy_v2
  • History 
297049 -  TrackerAPE_merged_mp3029
298653 -  TrackerAPE_merged_um0001
301046 -  TrackerAPE_merged_um0001
301392 -  TrackerAPE_merged_mp3029
303998 -  TrackerAPE_merged_um0001
304447 -  TrackerAPE_merged_mp3029
304663 -  TrackerAPE_merged_um0001
304991 -  TrackerAPE_merged_mp3029
306464 -  TrackerAPE_merged_mp3115

  • Conditions: Multi IOV tags TrackerAlignment_v25_offline + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v12_offline + TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v11_offline_IOVs
  • AlCaDB HN and TK alignment HN 
TrackerAlignment_v25_offline contains
 - the past from TrackerAlignment_v23_offline
 - TrackerAlignment_2017_ultralegacy_v1 from 297049
 - and TrackerAlignment_v24_offline from 313041

TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v12_offline contains
 - the past from TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v11_offline
 - TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2017_ultralegacy_v1 from 297049
 - and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v11_offline from 313041

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v11_offline_IOVs_fixed contains
 - the past from TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v9_offline_IOVs
 - TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacy_v1 from 297049
 - and TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v10_offline_IOVs from 313041

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v11_offline_IOVs by mistake contained TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2017_ultralegacy_v2 as well

TrackerAlignment_v23_offline

NB: IDENTICAL TO v21

  • CondDB tag contains TrackerAlignment_v21_offline + additional IOV from mp2636/jobm1 (IOV13)
  • Only update of the alignment from 305898.
  • TIF HN and AlCaDB HN

Compiling information from v21 and v23:

IOV since test run int. lumi/fb alignmet+surfaces APE Era
1 294034 296173 0.0 mp2608 v1 Run2017A
2 296641 297057 0.3 mp2608 v1 Run2017A
3 297179 297219 2.0 mp2608 v1 Run2017B
4 297281 297503 2.6 mp2608 v1 Run2017B
5 298653 299061 6.4 hp2300 v2 Run2017B
6 299277 299368 7.3 hp2300 v2 Run2017B
7 299443 300157 8.1 hp2300 v3 Run2017C
8 300389 300560 11.8 mp2608 v3 Run2017C
9 301046 301472 15.9 mp2607 v3 Run2017C
10 302131 302472 20.3 hp2300 v3 Run2017D
11 303790 304292 25.3 hp2300 v3 Run2017E
12 304911 305108 35.3 mp2607 v3 Run2017F
13 305898 305898 37.7 mp2636   Run2017F

TrackerAlignment_v22_offline

DO NOT USE!

TrackerAlignment_v21_offline + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v11_offline + TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v9_offline_IOVs

Tags at CondDB:

Announcement: TIF hypernews and AlCaDB

IOV since test run int. lumi/fb alignmet+surfaces APE Era
1 294034 296173 0.0 mp2608 v1 Run2017A
2 296641 297057 0.3 mp2608 v1 Run2017A
3 297179 297219 2.0 mp2608 v1 Run2017B
4 297281 297503 2.6 mp2608 v1 Run2017B
5 298653 299061 6.4 hp2300 v2 Run2017B
6 299277 299368 7.3 hp2300 v2 Run2017B
7 299443 300157 8.1 hp2300 v3 Run2017C
8 300389 300560 11.8 mp2608 v3 Run2017C
9 301046 301472 15.9 mp2607 v3 Run2017C
10 302131 302472 20.3 hp2300 v3 Run2017D
11 303790 304292 25.3 hp2300 v3 Run2017E
12 304911 305108 35.3 mp2607 v3 Run2017F
13 305898 305898 37.7 mp2636 v3 Run2017F

Details:

  • summary of performance at DPG meeting November 14, 2017
  • final candidates and validation (incl. also non-selected test objects): TkAl meeting November 1, 2017
  • APE TkAl meeting November 15, 2017
  • For each IOV, hp2300 was run in three steps with 10 iterations each: first, aligning the high level structures in both BPIX and FPIX, then aligning BPIX at module level including the primary vertex constraint, then aligning FPIX (except local w) at module level. The first step used cosmics+collisions in IOVs 5, 7, 10, and 11, where there were enough cosmic tracks for them to provide a reasonable constraint; in IOV 6 there were not enough cosmics, so only collisions were used. The second and third steps used collisions only in all IOVs.
  • Doc for IOV13

TrackerAlignment_forPrompt2017_v1

Post-TS2 pixel ML alignment (on top of updates by PCL), consistent with v6 gain calibration and v10 templates. Internal reference mp2564/jobm1.

Tag at CondDB

Details of the object and validation are discussed in

To summarize, the PV performance got improved especially in dz vs eta, DMR in BPX similar as GT and FPX got improved. The chi2 probability plot is included to show the difference between 0 APE and the current APE in GT.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v11

consistent with the new deployed pixel templates and new HV in strips

Tag at CondDB

Internal ID hp2250 ( validation)

Anouncement on Hypernews

TrackerAlignment_forFall2017ReReco_v0 + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_forFall2017ReReco_v0

Tags at CondDB:

Full strips-detector module level alignment, pixel HL. Surface deformations same as TrackerSurfaceDeformations_StartUp17_v9. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_Prompt_v8 from runs 300400 - 301649 with min-bias, iso-mu, Z-mumu, and cosmics. Internal id mp2541/jobm1.

Details at Tracker Alignment Meeting, 2017-08-30 in the presentations

TrackerAlignment_v20_offline + TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v10_offline

Tags at CondDB:

The offline tags created according to the request from AlCa/DB HN which contain multi-IOVs from 2016 Legacy and 2017 selected payloads.

TrackerAlignment_ReReco2017_v0 + surfaces +APE

Tags at CondDB:

Private tags are created to contain only 2017 multi-IOVs and prepare for 2017 Re-Reco as proposed in AlCa/DB Meeting.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v10

consistent with the new deployed pixel templates and the L2 timing

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment on 300389. Internal ID sm2251. More information in TkAl HN announcement.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v9 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment based on Run 299592-98+299614-617. The update was to accommodate the new pixel template (v7) and the latest timing settings. Internal ID sm2238. Full validation at TkAlStartUp2017/express_299380_v2.pdf, TkAlStartUp2017/express_299592-98_smonly_v2.pdf, TkAlStartUp2017/express_299614-17_smonly_v2.pdf.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v8 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data 299327 (after magnet trip 17-Jul). Internal ID mp2505. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v4. Full validation at TkAlStartUp2017/express_299329.pdf

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v7

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data 298996 (post TS1 with new Vcal calibration). Internal ID hp2042. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v4 (includes the templates v6). Full validation at TkAlStartUp2017/express_298996.pdf

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v6 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, runs 298653, 298671, 298678, including cosmics runs 298647/48/51/57/58/61/68. Internal ID hp2225. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2. Full validation at TkAlStartUp2017/hptest_170710_298653_71_78_with9_2_0_withPCL.pdf

TrackerAlignment_from06Jul2017ReReco_v0 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment on 06Jul2017ReReco of 297664+297671 (updated VCal calibration, PH, gain calibration), based on conditions in 92X_dataRun2_July6ReReco_PixelCommissioning_v2 + dedicated templates SiPixelTemplateDBObject_phase1_38T_2017_v6. Internal id mp2498/jobm1.

Remarks:

TrackerAlignment_from04Jul2017ReReco_v0

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment on 04Jul2017ReReco of 297292 (updated VCal gain calibration), based on conditions in 92X_dataRun2_July4ReReco_PixelCommissioning. Internal id mp2495.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v5 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, run 297292 mp2494. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 plus SiPixelTemplateDBObject_phase1_38T_2017_v3_hltvalidation template CPE that is appropriate for bias voltage of 200 V in layer 1, 100 V other layers.

NB: above tags are identical to the tags with same name appended by _forHLTValidation.

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v4 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, run 297211 hp2207. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 plus SiPixelTemplateDBObject_phase1_38T_2017_v2_hltvalidation template CPE that is appropriate for bias voltage of 100 V (fixing the wrong templates in GT).

Validation presented at tracker-alignment meeting, 2017-06-21.

Note, due to some mistake, tracker alignment contains 3 payloads corresponding to object hp2207, mp2494 and hp2207. The correct object should be hp2207 as the latest payload (hash 04d204f309394e486a187accba60ee107e517824).

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v3 + surfaces

Tags at CondDB:

Pixel ML alignment + surfaces from 2017 collision data, run 296786 hp2195. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 plus SiPixelTemplateDBObject_phase1_38T_2017_v2_hltvalidation template CPE that is appropriate for bias voltage of 100 V (fixing the wrong templates in GT).

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v2

Tag at CondDB: TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v2

Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data, run 296786 mp2480. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 for appropriate runs (see below).

The object has been derived using the collision data of the runs 296786. The template CPE of the GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 were used in the track re-fits. It is based on the GT, which was essentially hp2026. The movement compared to the pervious object is below 50 μm, except for few modules in BPX layer1. The object mostly improves the BPX resolution in all layers, as seen from the DMR validation. The run has a more optimized timing setting for BPX.

Full set of validations (mp2480 in dark turquoise).

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v1

Tag at CondDB: TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v1

Pixel ML alignment from 2017 collision data, run 295463 hp2026. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 for appropriate runs (see below).

The object has been derived using the collision data of the runs 295463. The template CPE of the GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 were used in the track re-fits. It is based on the GT, which was essentially mp2438. The movement compared to the pervious object is at maximum ~100 μm, mostly in BPX layer1. The object mostly improves the BPX layer1 resolution, as seen from the DMR validation. The run has a more optimized timing setting for BPX, derived also a better performance in Primary vertex.

Full set of validations (hp2026 in cyan in DMR and in black in PV).

TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v0

Tag at CondDB: TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v0

Pixel ML alignment from first 2017 collision data + CRAFT/interfill cosmics. Internal reference mp2438. Derived against GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 for appropriate runs (see below).

The object has been derived using the collision data of the runs 295209+295210 as well as CRAFT (private rereco) and interfill cosmics data. The template CPE of the GT 92X_dataRun2_express_v2 were used in the track re-fits. It is the result of several iterations with successively more degrees of freedom aligned as well as a final iteration to test the stability of the solution. We find positions of the pixel high-level structures to be within 50mum of the position in the GT, in agreement to what was earlier observed in PCL. Individual modules can have significantly larger differences. Note that for one FPX module, a position difference of 4mm is found. The local resolution (as measured by the DMRs) improves significantly, in particular in FPX. We also see different performance in the different BPX layers, clearly worst in Layer 1. We also observe that the curvature of the modules, which is assumed to be flat in the current reconstruction, is not well modeled in FPX (BPX hard to tell with given precision). In the current alignments, it is not adjusted, but this is sth. to be improved in a next iteration with mored data. The primary vertex performance is slightly improved over the GT, not much though. We assume also some interplay with the beamspot that is taken from the GT for this validation.

All modules were aligned except

  • 82 modules receiving no hits at all;
  • 29 modules receiving less than a minimum number of hits required for the alignment fit.

Full set of validations (mp2438 in cyan).

TrackerAlignment_CRAFT17_v0

Tag at CondDB: TrackerAlignment_CRAFT17_v0 Identical to mp2398 documented below.

Validations presented at TkAl meeting 2017-05-17.

CRAFT17 PREP Objects

date object description
2017-05-17 TrackerAlignment_mp2399 mp2399/jobm: CRAFT-data alignment: pixel HL, strips HL (started from CRUZET ML alignment TrackerAlignment_mp2397), add. comments 2
2017-05-17 TrackerAlignment_mp2398 mp2398/jobm: CRAFT-data alignment: pixel HL, strips HL (started from CRUZET ML alignment TrackerAlignment_mp2397), add. comments 2
Additional comments 1
  • Depends on surface conditions in GT 90X_dataRun2_Express_v4 for IOV 290550
  • Includes full pixel detector, using private rereco for those runs that include BPX; simultaneous alignment of all detectors
  • APE=0 in fit (fully correct covariance matrix); APE=100mum in pixel for re-fit
  • Generic CPE (as templates not working)
  • Entries cut 15
    • Ladders/blades receiving hits (i.e. non-dead modules) but below N(hits) threshold: 6.0%. For mp2399, those ladders/blades are not aligned
    • Ladders/blades without hits: 1.7% (attributed to dead modules)

TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v4

Tag at CondDB: TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v4 Same as TrackerAlignment_mp2397 documented below at "CRUZET17 PREP Objects"

TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v3

Tags at CondDB:

A few informations from routine aligners: (mp2374)

  • Starting geometry: TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v1
  • Type of data used to derive it: CRUZET17 Express data (runs 290550-292358)
  • use case for the payload: ML-FPIX alignment to improve data taking performance

TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v1

Tags at CondDB:

Content:

  • Pixel High-Level alignment (excluding BPIX hits): mp2358
  • The first CRUZET Alignment for 2017 included in the production
  • Ignoring pixel hits in the track-refit and alignment. Otherwise identical to mp2355

More details can be found here.

Tags at CondDB:

Content:

  • Pixel High-Level alignment (excluding BPIX hits): mp2355

More details can be found here.

PreCRUZET2017 _v1

Content:

  • pixel is ideal
  • strip from IOV 284038 in TrackerAlignment_EOY16_sm1959 (54f63024c9dff456c4c812a32bc2368a92f4e467) and from IOV 271866 in TrackerSurfaceDeformations_EOY16_mp2269 (92a2c43586e74f3d197a46af56194c6bb9780814)

New tags:

CRUZET17 PREP Objects

date object description
2017-05-12 TrackerAlignment_mp2397 mp2397/jobm: CRUZET-data alignment: pixel ML, strips HL (iteration of mp2396/jobm, entries: 15), add. comments 1
2017-05-12 TrackerAlignment_mp2396-2 mp2396/jobm2: CRUZET-data alignment: pixel ML, strips HL (entries: 15), add. comments 1
2017-05-12 TrackerAlignment_mp2396 mp2396/jobm: CRUZET-data alignment: pixel ML, strips HL (entries: 25), add. comments 1
2017-05-08 TrackerAlignment_mp2387 BPX ML alignment mp2387 description
2017-05-02 TrackerAlignment_mp2374 FPX ML alignment mp2374; same object as # TrackerAlignment_CRUZET17_v3
Additional comments 1
  • Depends on surface conditions in GT 90X_dataRun2_Express_v4 for IOV 290550
  • Includes full pixel detector, using private rereco for those runs that include BPX; simultaneous alignment of all detectors
  • APE=0 in fit (fully correct covariance matrix)
  • Generic CPE (as templates not working)
  • Modules receiving hits (i.e. non-dead modules) that are not aligned because N(hits) below threshold: 1.7% (in case of entries cut 15), 10.8% (in case of entries cut 25)
  • Total amount of pixel modules w/o hits: 4.4% (attributed to dead modules)

APE Objects with Fixed Values

The following APE scenarios were created with fixed APE (given in mum in the tag name) and are valid for the Phase-I detector.

APE PROD Objects:

date object (DB) description
2017-07-21 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v5 APE BPIX and FPX: 5, except BPX L1 x direction (10) TIB: 5 TOB: 10 TID and TEC; 20 for TrackerAlignment_forPrompt2017_v1.
2017-07-21 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v4 APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 40, L2yz20, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 10mum; TID, TEC xyz: 20mum; based on APE measurement on 299327-29 for TrackerAlignment_StartUp17_v8 and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_StartUp17_v8
2017-07-07 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v3 moderately inflated over v2 pixel APE for after TS1-magnet ramp. APE (in mum): L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in BPX 20, FPX 40; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before)
2017-06-22 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v2 APE (in mum) payload based on the last measuerement with 296786: L1x: 30, L1yz: 70, L2y40, rest in pixel: 5; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before)
2017-06-17 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_StartUp17_v1 APE payload based on the last measuerement with 296463, keeping 100mum in L1: L1 xyz: 100mum (as before); L2 y: 40mum; L2 xz; L3-L4 xyz FPX xyz: 10mum; TIB, TOB xyz: 20mum (as before); TID, TEC xyz: 40mum (as before); values based on measuerement presented at TkAl meeting, June 7, 2017
2017-05-18 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX50_FPIX50_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 50mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
2017-05-18 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX100_FPIX100_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 100mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
2017-05-18 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX500_FPIX500_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 500mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC

APE PREP Objects

date object (DB) description
2017-06-09 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPX-L1-Scenario_v0 BPX Layer 1: 500mum x,y,z; BPX Layer 2: 10mum x,z and 40mum y; BPX Layer 3+4: 10mum x,y,y; FPX,TIB,TOB: 10mum x,y,y; TID,TEC: 20mum x,y,y
2017-05-17 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX50_FPIX50_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 50mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC
2017-05-08 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_BPIX100_FPIX100_TIB20_TOB20_TID40_TEC40 100mum in pixel; 20 mum in TIB,TOB; 40 mum in TID, TEC

Dedicated APE Objects

The following APE objects were measured in data and are valid for the Phase-I detector.

date object (DB) description
2017-05-22 TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v3 Dedicated APE object for TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v3; see comment 1
Comment 1
  • Contains the values listed in Valeria's slide 8 in the column sigma(pseudo-asym17, alignment), where I took the larger value for the z-coordinate.
  • For the strips I took the values from 2016 MC scenario.

TrackerAlignment_Phase1Realistic_v2 and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_Phase1Realistic_v2 and TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors _Phase1Realistic_v2

Tags:

TrackerAlignment_Phase1Realignment_CRAFT

Starting geometry: corresponding CRUZET payload (see below)

Alignables: pixel only

  1. ML alignment

Tags at CondDB

TrackerAlignment_Phase1Realignment_CRUZET

Starting geometry: TrackerAlignment_Phase1Startup_Misalignment_v0

Alignable: pixel only, in two steps

  1. HLS alignment
  2. HLS+ML alignment

Different statistics are available at CondDB:

TrackerAlignment_Phase1Startup_Misalignment_v0

Tag at CondDB

Realistic startup scenario after installation and before any alignment procedure.

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v0

Tag at CondDB

Random gaussian smearing of the module position in BPIX and FPIX using the RMS of the BPIX and FPIX spread of the modules in the current asymptotic phase-0 scenario.

(Documentation coming soon)

WARNING: based on wrong ideal geometry. Do not use!

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v1

Hybrid scenario of 2016 asymptotic MC scenario for pixel and a-priori set alignment for Phase-I pixel, based on the 2016 MC scenario in the pixel.

This scenarios was created to get a phase-1 scenario with similar performance as the phase-0 asymptotic scenario by applying the RMS values from the phase-0 pixel as gaussian smearing to the phase-1 pixel. The values are documented here The strips alignment is as in the 2016 MC asymptotic scenario for MC 80X, presented at the AlCa/DB meeting, March 7, 2016.

This scenario goes together with the "realistic" surfaces (NB: ideal in pixel, NOT ideal in strips!).

WARNING: based on wrong ideal geometry. Do not use!

MC Production Scenarios

Fixed ideal phase-I geometry TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_design_v4

"Ideal" alignment with fixed phase-I geometry

Original payload: /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ghellwig/public/for_alca-db_contacts/tracker_alignment_payloads__pixel_ideal__strips_aligned_to_91X_upgrade2017_design_Candidate_2017_05_10_09_23_53.db

Pseudo-asymptotic scenario TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v2

"pseudo asymptotic" alignment: emulating the expected asymptotic performance by applying the residual resolution of the 2016 MC asymptotic scenario (in strips: same as 2016, in pixel: 2016 resolution applied as smearing to the phase-I detector)

This scenarios was created to get a phase-1 scenario with similar performance as the phase-0 asymptotic scenario by applying the RMS values from the phase-0 pixel as gaussian smearing to the phase-1 pixel. The values are documented here The strips alignment is as in the 2016 MC asymptotic scenario for MC 80X, presented at the AlCa/DB meeting, March 7, 2016.

This scenario goes together with the "realistic" surfaces (NB: ideal in pixel, NOT ideal in strips!).

Original payload: /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ghellwig/public/for_alca-db_contacts/geometry_MisalignmentScenario_PhaseI_PseudoAsymptotic__from_tracker_alignment_payloads__pixel_ideal__strips_aligned_to_91X_upgrade2017_realistic_Candidate_2017_05_10_16_13_16.db

Pseudo-asymptotic scenario TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v3

"pseudo asymptotic" alignment: emulating the expected asymptotic performance by applying the residual resolution of the 2016 MC asymptotic scenario (in strips: same as 2016, in pixel: started with 2016 resolution applied as smearing to the phase-I detector, and then was scaled down to match the performance observed in EOY16 data). It is the same as TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_pseudoAsymptotic_v2, but the pixel smearing factors where reduced by factors of 0.2 in FPX and 0.5 in BPX to match the DMR performance (RMS of alignment curve, RMS of ideal subtracted quadratically) in EOY16 data.

Original payload: /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/PayLoads/2017-05-12_PseudoAsymptoticMCScenario/pseudo-asymptotic_FPX-0p2_BPX-0p5.db

Documentation at Tracker-alignment meeting, 2017-05-22

Technical PREP MC payloads

TrackerAlignment_Upgrade2017_design_v4_strips-EOY16

Technical payload for CRUZET/CRAFT17 validation studies:

Original payload: /afs/cern.ch/work/g/ghellwig/public/for_alca-db_contacts/tracker_alignment_payloads__pixel_ideal__strips_aligned_to_TrackerAlignment_PreCRUZET2017_v1.db

Run 2016

Ultra-Legacy campaign for 2016

Candidate 1, based on the object from /afs/cern.ch/work/j/jschulz/public/merged_dbFiles/merged_mp3218.db and /afs/cern.ch/work/j/jschulz/public/merged_dbFiles/merged_mp3218.db

Candidate 2, based on the object from /afs/cern.ch/work/j/jschulz/public/merged_dbFiles/merged_mp3297.db and /afs/cern.ch/work/j/jschulz/public/merged_dbFiles/merged_mp3297.db

Candidate 2 has been packaged into multi-IOV tags TrackerAlignment_v27_offline + TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v14_offline_IOVs with the following history: 

TrackerAlignment_v27_offline
0      - 271865: Content of TrackerAlignment_v26_offline in that run range
271866 - 290542: TrackerAlignment_2016_ultralegacy_v2
290543 - inf: : Content of TrackerAlignment_v26_offline in that run range

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v14_offline_IOVs
0      - 271865: Content of TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v13_offline_IOVs in that run range
271866 - 290542: TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_2016_ultralegacy_v2
290543 - inf: : Content of TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_v13_offline_IOVs in that run range

TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v9_offline and TrackerAlignment_v19_offline

Tags at TrackerAlignment_v19_offline and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v9_offline

  • dedicated offline multi-IOV tags for surfaces and for alignment
  • respective copies of TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v7_offline and TrackerAlignment_v17_offline up to run2016A
  • then including legacy campaign (EOY16)

TrackerAlignment_EOY16_sm1959 and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_EOY16_mp2269

Final object

Dedicated TWiki to the EOY campaign (for technical details only!) More information can be found here. For APEs, see dedicated section below.

Starting conditions (v2) after new IOVs definition

  • GTs to use: 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forTkAlNovCamp_singleIOV_v1 (single-IOV), 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forTkAlNovCamp_multiIOV_v1 (multi-IOV)

For single-IOV : 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forTkAlNovCamp_singleIOV_v1 is created with following conditions changed

For multi-IOV : 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forTkAlNovCamp_multiIOV_v1 is created with following conditions changed

More details at:

Zmumu studies

These tags are misalignment of the aforementionned geometries with:

Starting conditions (v1)

  • GTs to use: 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forMPTkAlNovCamp_v1 (single-IOV), 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forHipPyTkAlNovCamp_v1 (multi-IOV)

For single-IOV : 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forMPTkAlNovCamp_v1 is created with following conditions changed

For multi-IOV : 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v15_forHipPyTkAlNovCamp_v1 is created with following conditions changed

More details at:

TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v8_offline and TrackerAlignment_v18_offline

Tags at _v18_offline and CondDB (surface deformations)

Note: this corresponds to (corrected version of) the September 2016 ReReco campaign (EOY16 Legacy alignment will be performed in November 2016)

Announcement on 10 September and on 14 October

TrackerAlignment_ReReco2016BtoG and TrackerAlignmentSurfaceDeformation_ReReco2016BtoG_v1

Note: mind the v1 for surface deformations

Tags at CondDB (alignment) and at CondDB (surfaces)

  • ReReco campaign before HIP mitigation
  • pixel only at ML
  • multi-IOV, ladder as HLS
  • includes new fit of surface shape deformations
  • starting from TrackerAlignment_Run2016B
  • internal reference mp2226/jobData/jobm3
    • original object (wrong surface payload!) was mp2226/jobData/jobm2
    • mp2226/jobData/jobm3 has the surfaces fixed

Note: the wrong surface deformations were in express and HLT conditions for some time (see announcement on 14 October)

Full report on indico page of the TkAl meeting of 7 September (note: documentation not up-to-date!! still correspond to the wrong surface deformations!!)

Annoucement on the hypernews

These conditions have been input in express and HLT as well (see main page the TWiki).

TrackerAlignment_v17_offline

Tag at CondDB

  • This is a copy of TrackerAlignment_v16_offline up to run 275417
  • also including later PCL updates

TrackerAlignment_v16_offline

Multi-IOV tag containing:

Test tag TrackerAlignment_v14_0T_offline at PREP2 DB.

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_276363

Tags at CondDB

This new alignment has been derived by the online PCL workflow that aligns pixel high-level structures, using the data of run 276363 which corrects for small but significant movements induced by the magnet cycle.

TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_275376

Tags at CondDB

This new alignment has been derived by the online PCL workflow that aligns pixel high-level structures, using the data of run 275375. More details are discussed here.

TrackerAlignment_Run2016B

Tags at CondDB:

Tracker alignment [May Camp] started from GT 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v8 and overwrote the following records :

with new created self-GT 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_Candidate_2016_05_12_11_59_51.

Note : The "SiPixelTemplateDBObject_38T_2016_v1_hltvalidation" tag was actually mistaken to be uploaded to SiPixelTemplateDBObject0TRcd instead of SiPixelTemplateDBObjectRcd in this self-GT candidate and the alignments were uploaded for both aligners under tags TrackerAlignment_MP_Run2016B and TrackerAlignment_HP_Run2016B.

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_Run2016B_PseudoPCL_v1

Tag at CondDB

Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL workflow on run 272775 and conditions in GT 80X_dataRun2_Express_v6.

TrackerAlignment_Run2016A_PseudoPCL_v1

Tag at CondDB

Tracker alignment derived from the Pseudo-PCL workflow on run 272011 and conditions in GT 80X_dataRun2_Express_v6 (CRUZET alignment).

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_HP_CRUZET2016

Tag at CondDB

Tracker alignment constants starting from IOV 260335 of 2015-EOY_v1_RunD with new created self-GT 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_Candidate_2016_04_18_10_23_57. This alignment was selected as CRUZET2016 alignment.

Use with TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_MP_CRUZET2016

Tag at CondDB

Use with TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD

Tracker alignment constants starting from IOV 260335 of 2015-EOY_v1_RunD with new created self-GT 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_Candidate_2016_04_18_10_23_57.

More details at:

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_EOY16_sm1959 and TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_EOY16_SingleIOV_sm1959

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_ReReco2016BtoG

Tag at CondDB

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_Run2016B_*

Tags at CondDB:

APEs for Run2016B correspond to each validation. Presented at TkAl meeting, 2016-05-24.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_Run2016B

Update of the following tags:

detector APE(x,y,z)
BPIX, TIB, TOB 10μm
FPIX, TID, TEC 20μm
Note: This update reduces the previously employed conservative APEs of 100μm in the pixel detector, which were put in place to take into account the remaining uncertainties of the CRUZET-data derived pixel start-up alignment (see below). This update is based on the conclusions from recent validation with the Run2015A collision data and CRAFT as well as the very latest online DQM results, which clearly indicate that the APE are overestimated and that smaller APE would describe better the data.

TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016

Tag at CondDB.

APE for 2016 collision start-up. Conservative estimate from 2015 operation experience of 20μm in the barrel and 40μm in the endcap detectors, plus inflated APE (100μm) in the pixel to account for the foreseen magnet ramp:

detector APE(x,y,z)
BPIX, FPIX 100μm
TIB, TOB 20μm
TID, TEC 40μm

Alignment and Surface Deformation Objects (MC)

TrackerAlignment_Asymptotic_Run2016_v1_mc

Tag at TrackerAlignment_Asymptotic_Run2016_v1_mc at CondDB.

Tracker alignment constants simulating the asymptotic conditions at 2016 data taking after ~3/fb. Derived starting from the start-up scenario TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v1_mc, re-aligned at high-level with cosmics and collision data tracks at 3.8T. Depends on conditions in GT 76X_mcRun2_design_v14. Internal reference /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/MP/MPproduction/mp1982.

This alignment contains no scenario of the surface deformation.

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_Asymptotic_Run2016_v0_mc

NOTE Has been derived relative to design local-reco conditions, therefore not usable with realistic conditions! Fix available in #TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v1_mc

Tag at TrackerAlignment_Asymptotic_Run2016_v0_mc at CondDB.

Tracker alignment constants simulating the asymptotic conditions at 2016 data taking after ~3/fb. Derived starting from the start-up scenario TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v0_mc, re-aligned at high-level with cosmics and collision data tracks at 3.8T. Depends on conditions in GT 76X_mcRun2_design_v14. Internal reference /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/MP/MPproduction/mp1961.

The alignment scenario can be used together with the existing surface deformation scenario . TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2011Realistic_v2_mc

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v1_mc

Tag at TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v1_mc CondDB

Tracker alignment constants simulating the post-CRUZET 2016 start-up conditions. Derived starting from a pre-CRUZET mis-alignment scenario, re-aligned at high-level with 0T cosmics tracks (CRUZET). Depends on conditions in GT 76X_mcRun2cosmics_startup_peak_v0. Internal reference /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/MP/MPproduction/mp1971.

The alignment scenario can be used together with the existing surface deformation scenario .

This is a fix of #TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v0_mc

More details at:

TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v0_mc

NOTE Has been derived relative to design local-reco conditions, therefore not usable with realistic conditions! Fix available in #TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v1_mc

Tag at TrackerAlignment_Startup_Run2016_v0_mc CondDB

Tracker alignment constants simulating the post-CRUZET 2016 start-up conditions. Derived starting from a pre-CRUZET mis-alignment scenario, re-aligned at high-level with 0T cosmics tracks (CRUZET). Depends on conditions in GT 76X_mcRun2_design_v14. Internal reference /afs/cern.ch/cms/CAF/CMSALCA/ALCA_TRACKERALIGN/MP/MPproduction/mp1957.

The alignment scenario can be used together with the existing surface deformation scenario .

More details at:

Run 2015

General Information

How to upload new Tracker Alignments to the production GTs

Show description Hide description

First of all, one needs to create new tags to the CondDB browser for global usage (ECAL and Muon people). More information about how to create new tags can be found in hands-on session here.

Then, we should announce these new tags to AlCaDB conveners (cms-PPD-conveners-AlCaDB@cernNOSPAMPLEASE.ch) so they can check and give the green-light to upload them to existing GTs of HLT, Express and Prompt workflows.

After conveners signed-off, what needs to be done is to update, appending a new IOV, the 3 payloads for TrackerAlignment, TrackerSurfaceDeformations and APE, to the existing tags that are already included in the production Global Tags. You can check what are the latest existing production Global Tag for each workflow here. For example, the current Global Tag of HLT is 80X_dataRun2_HLT_v12, Express is 80X_dataRun2_Express_v5 and Prompt is 80X_dataRun2_Prompt_v6.

And in order to check inside each of these Global Tags which are the relevant tags for Tracker Alignment you can use the conddb command within a CMSSW release. 

 conddb list <name_of_the_GT> | grep <name_of_your_record>

(The name_of_your_record relevant for Tracker Alignment are TrackerAlignmentRcd, TrackerSurfaceDeformationRcd and TrackerAlignmentErrorExtendedRcd)

This exercised on the 3 Global Tags above will yield you the table and therefore you can see there is a total of 7 tags to be updated.

All these 6 tags need to be updated. Let's retrive the sqlite files again from the new tags you just created. 

 
conddb_import -c sqlite_file:TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD.db -f frontier://FrontierProd/CMS_CONDITIONS -i TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD -t TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD

conddb_import -c sqlite_file:TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016.db -f frontier://FrontierProd/CMS_CONDITIONS -i TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 -t TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016 

conddb_import -c sqlite_file:TrackerAlignment_HP_CRUZET2016.db -f frontier://FrontierProd/CMS_CONDITIONS -i TrackerAlignment_HP_CRUZET2016 -t TrackerAlignment_HP_CRUZET2016

Then you should do 3 uploads (1 for each of your sqlite files) using the similar metadata files below for each record. 

 uploadConditions.py <name_of_file.db>

The txt files should be in the same folder as the sqlite files in which you upload and since these tags have already the correct synchronization, you don't need to specify the since (the service will automatically synchronize to the correct version).

The examples of metadata files for each record 

 
{
    "destinationDatabase": "oracle://cms_orcon_prod/CMS_CONDITIONS",
    "destinationTags": {
        "TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_express_IOVs": {},
        "TrackerAlignmentExtendedErr_2009_v2_hlt_IOVs": {}
    },
    "inputTag": "TrackerAlignmentExtendedErrors_CRUZET2016",
    "since": null,
    "userText": "APE for 2016 startup: 100um for BPix and FPix, 20um for TIB and TOB, 40um for TID and TEC"
}

 
{
    "destinationDatabase": "oracle://cms_orcon_prod/CMS_CONDITIONS",
    "destinationTags": {
        "TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express": {},
        "TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v0_hlt": {}
    },
    "inputTag": "TrackerAlignment_HP_CRUZET2016",
    "since": null,
    "userText": "Tracker alignment from CRUZET16 data, correcting positions and rotations of the barrel high level structures, starting from IOV 9 of EOY2015"
}

 
{
    "destinationDatabase": "oracle://cms_orcon_prod/CMS_CONDITIONS",
    "destinationTags": {
        "TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_express": {},
        "TrackerSurafceDeformations_v1_hlt": {}
    },
    "inputTag": "TrackerSurfaceDeformations_2015-EOY_v1_RunD",
    "since": null,
    "userText": "Tracker Surface deformation from IOV9 of EOY 2015 alignment"
}

Example of how to import a payload from the DB into a local sqlite file, e.g. to prepare a tag with results of the pseudo-PCL workflow for central validation. The following will retrieve the payload of the IOV starting with 275375, put it into the local sqlite file SiPixelAli_PCL_v0_prompt_r275375.db and set the IOV range from 1 to infinity: 

 
conddb_import -c sqlite_file:SiPixelAli_PCL_v0_prompt_r275375.db -f frontier://FrontierPrep/CMS_CONDITIONS -i SiPixelAli_PCL_v0_prompt -t SiPixelAli_PCL_v0_prompt_r275375 -b 275375

echo 'update IOV set SINCE=1 where SINCE=275375;' | sqlite3 SiPixelAli_PCL_v0_prompt_r275375.db

How to monitor PCL alignment workflows

Show description Hide description

  • Our SiPixelAli_PCL can be monitored here as well as the others PCL. You can see there is a plot for SiPixelAli_pcl.
  • If you click on the legend at the top right of pclMon page, it will explain the meaning of each color. Basically when it's white, it means no payload was uploaded but when it's green, something has been uploaded (there is also some potential delay which sometimes you might see it's purple, don't panic, it will turn green sometime later but report to AlCa /DB if it's not the case)
  • Once you know if the payload has been uploaded or not, you can check the parameters on the offline DQM GUI, for example here DQM link, there is a series of plots for each run (click on Run #). You can see numbers of run from current data taking corresponding to run numbers on pclMon page and you can check DQM for those runs which have new payload uploaded.
  • You can also check PV performance for example this link or on-time monitoring from this link.
  • You can even double-check new payload uploaded via conddb command line, for example, 
 conddb list TrackerAlignment_PCL_byRun_v2_express | grep 2016-08-20
  • or from condDB browser, link.

Note 1 see monitoring illustration from Chayanit's slides reported in TkAl meeting on 24 Aug 2016.

Note 2 small tip for circulating the DQM links: click on the small anchor sign on the top right part of the screen with the "link me" text, copying the URL won't work because each user session is accessible only under his/her own GRID certificate.

Responsible: TamasAlmosVami

Attachments Attachments
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
Texttxt create_scenarios.py.txt r2 r1 manage 10.2 K 2008-06-16 - 17:04 MartinWeber Tool for creation, validation and database insertion of tracker database objects, e.g. misalignment scenarios.
Textini scenarios.ini r1 manage 0.7 K 2008-06-16 - 17:05 MartinWeber File containing description of scenarios, used by create_scenarios.py
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r245 < r244 < r243 < r242 < r241 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r245 - 2020-05-22 - MuhammadAnsarIqbal
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright &© 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback