details: before 33x since 33x

To be considered "at full readiness," the validation code needs to either

  • Reliably produce filled histograms that accurately reflect the trigger behavior in the DQM GUI OR
  • Reliably produce results that can be quickly analyzed using a standalone package
To be considered "not at full readiness," the validation code is present, but either
  • The histograms are not reliably filled in the DQM GUI, and/or they do not accurately reflect the trigger behavior OR
  • The results are produced by standalone packages, but these packages take a non-negligible amount of time to run
There is a further category for packages that currently lacking active development work

Legend for Readiness Table

  • No : Package not at full readiness AND no development work underway
  • Yes / Done : Package is at full readiness
  • Work in progress, under construction : Package not at full readiness
  • Yes / Done/Work in progress, under construction : Package generally at full readiness and can be used for results, but some technical issues being worked on

  Group
Electron Photon Muon Jet MET Tau Top Higgs HeavyFlavor Susy Exotica
Work in progress, under construction Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Yes / Done/Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done/Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done/Work in progress, under construction No No Yes / Done Yes / Done Work in progress, under construction

Details of Readiness Table

  • Electron/!Photon: Validation currently relies on standalone analysis to produce results, results take some time to obtain.
  • Muon: Upcoming work on L1 propagator, protection of module labels in configuration for automatic path recognition. Results can be used in the meantime
  • Jet: Some empty histograms, active development to address this
  • MET: Same issue as jet. Stadalone code exists as backup to provide validation results
  • Tau: Generally ready; most recent RelVals only in DQM tier, RECO needed (Looks like it might be an event content issue)
  • Top, Higgs: Validation contact still needed to develop these packages
  • SUSY: Basic path efficiency counts for MC selection for each RA analysis
  • Exotica: Done by standalone analysis; validation package not yet integrated in HLTriggerOffline

No permission to view CMS.PdmVTableHLT52X

  • No : Validation done, result is "Not Validated". Report the resons below
  • Yes / Done : Validation done, result is "Ok, Validated"
  • Work in progress, under construction : Validation still in progress or results need to be followed up before final green/red light
  • Minus : Validation not (yet) done
  • n.s. : Needed validation (relval) samples not available
  • report : click on icon in table for link to the associated detailed report in the hlt forum
  • fastsim references: corresponding fullsim results in the same release

Responsible: NunoLeonardo

-- NunoLeonardo - 13-Mar-2010

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 2011-03-16 - NunoLeonardo
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback