Validation of Reconstruction code

Legend:

  • Target : Changes are expected, to be set according to software or condition changes prior to validation
  • No : Validation done, result is "Not Validated". Report the reasons below
  • Yes / Done : Validation done, result is "Ok, Validated"
  • Work in progress, under construction : Validation still in progress or results need to be followed up before final green/red light
  • Minus : Validation not (yet) done

Data in 4.2

Reports in this section are based on skims sample reprocessed as part of the release validation samples

Release Tk Ecal Hcal DT CSC RPC Tracking Electron Photon Muon Jet MET BTag Tau
data i npre1 Minus Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus No Yes / Done No Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre2 Minus Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre4 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre5 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre6 Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre7 Minus Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in pre8 Minus Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in 420 Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
data in 421 Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
data in 422 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
data in 423 Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in 424 Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in 425 Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in 426 Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
data in 428 Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus

pre1 details

  • 03-Feb-2011: 3_11_0 CSC (Tim Cox) - It's not actually No but not strictly Yes / Done since no /Mu/ sample has appeared in offline dqm for 3_11_0. But Yes / Done for 3_11_0_pre5 and 4_2_0_pre1 which have identical CSC code.

  • 07-Feb-2011: 4_2_0_pre1 Tracking (K. Burkett) - There is a loss of efficiency in iteration #2 (low pt pixel triplets) due to a problem in the threshold on max # of seeds.

MC in 4.2

Release Tk Ecal Hcal DT CSC RPC Tracking Electron Photon Muon Jet MET BTag Tau
mc in pre1 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
mc in pre2 Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus
mc in pre4 Minus Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done No Yes / Done Minus
mc in pre5 Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus
mc in pre6 Minus Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Minus Target,Minus Target,Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done No Minus
mc in pre7 Minus Target,Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done No Yes / Done Target,No Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Minus
mc in pre8 Minus Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Target,Yes / Done Minus
mc in 420 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Minus
mc in 421 Minus Target,Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Target,Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus
mc in 422 Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
mc in 423 Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus
mc in 424 Minus Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
mc in 425 Minus Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus
mc in 426 Minus Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus
mc in 428 Minus Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Yes / Done Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus
mc in 429_HLT1 Minus Work in progress, under construction Yes / Done Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus
mc in 429_HLT1_hltpatch1 Minus Work in progress, under construction Minus Minus Yes / Done Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus

pre4 details

  • 20-Feb-2011: MET(Dayong Wang): METs agree with previous release, but CaloEtInEE disagree in all samples. This is understood to be due to the changes in the EE SR threshold settings, which cause a reduction in the number of rechits in EE. The MET validation observation is consistent with ECAL validation results.

pre6 details

  • 15-Mar-2011: Jet(Kittikul Kovtianggoon): The new HCAL MC calibration is applied in in both fullsim and fastsim. There is a substantial effect of SamplingFactors (Digi) and to smaller

extent of HcalRespCorrs (Reco) on the HCAL energy scale. HE and HB/HE gap increase is more pronounced than HB one, HF is not affected.

pre7 details

  • 18-Mar-2010: Photon (Nancy) Not 100% successful Loss of efficiency in the conversion ecal seeded tracking, in the whole eta. Larger in the endcaps. To be understood
  • 28 Mar-2010: Photon (Nancy) The issues mentioned above is fully understood and fixed. There were no issues in the reconstruction. The difference in efficiency was due to a buggy configuration of the TrackAssociatorByHits used in the validation software (PhotonValidation.cc). The problem is fixed and the tag for the fix is queued for final 420 (and 430). The status of pre7 for photons is upgraded to OK in the table above.

  • 21-Mar-2011: (Claude) Significant differences are observed in the energy and pT distributions in particular in the endcaps. This is presumably due to changes in the SC energy corrections. Other distributions show expected changes related to the integration with plow, the delta_phi distribution of candidates passing the e/g preselection is still to be understood..

  • 23-Mar-2011 Muon POG (Andrea): L2 (and then L3): overall lower efficiencies at roughly 1.6 < |eta| < 1.8 and eta<-2.1. It has still to be understood whether it is due to some up-hill L1 muon inefficiency (therefore, not reco...) or in the L2 reconstruction itself. Studies are ongoing

pre8 details

  • 05-Apr-2011 Muon POG (Andrea): The inefficiencies observed at |eta|>1.6 are fully understood as coming from the inclusion in the conditions data (V6) of 9 CSC dead chambers. The V5 GlobalTag used for pre7 also included a few CSC dead chambers, but their list was not yet complete: therefore the "BAD" flag previously assigned to pre7 is still justified. In pre8, instead, the map of the dead chambers is the one that was actually intended.

420 details

  • 12-Apr-2011 b-tagging (Aram): Soft electron taggers show an unexpected decrease in efficiency. This was first noticed in 420pre7, but the soft electron taggers are low statistics and this could have been due to variations in the RelVals, but it's now clear that this is not the case. Both efficiency and mistag rate decrease, but the effiiciency decreases more.

Release Tk Ecal Hcal DT CSC RPC Tracking Electron Photon Muon Jet MET BTag Tau
template Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus Minus
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r146 < r145 < r144 < r143 < r142 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r146 - 2011-09-01 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback