CMS Exotica Summary plots for 13 TeV data

Moriond/LHCP 2021

Overall summary plot

caption plot
A bar chart representing the mass reach of CMS analyses.
pdf png svg (clickable)
CurrentBarChartVersion_v7.png

Long-lived particle summary plots

Overall summary plot

caption plot
A bar chart representing the lifetime reach of CMS long-lived particle analyses for a selected set of new physics phenomena.
pdf png svg (clickable)

Displaced and delayed hadronic signatures

caption plot
The 95% CL observed exclusion limit from different CMS hadronic long-lived particle analyses on the pair production cross section of a long-lived gluino in the mini-split model, assuming a 100% branching fraction for the gluino to decay into a quark-antiquark pair and the lightest neutralino. The gluino and neutralino masses are assumed to be 2400 GeV and 100 GeV, respectively and the gluino is treated as a neutral, non-interacting particle.
pdf png

DM summary plots

caption plot

95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet and di-lepton searches from CMS in the Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.1, lepton coupling gl = 0.1, and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet and di-lepton searches from CMS in the Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.1, lepton coupling gl = 0.01, and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.

Moriond/LHCP/Fall 2020

Overall summary plot

caption plot
A bar chart representing the mass reach of CMS analyses.
pdf png svg (clickable)
CurrentBarChartVersion_v6.png

Long-lived particle summary plots

Overall summary plot

caption plot
A bar chart representing the lifetime reach of CMS long-lived particle analyses for a selected set of new physics phenomena.
pdf png svg (clickable)

Displaced and delayed hadronic signatures

caption plot
The 95% CL observed exclusion limit from different CMS hadronic long-lived particle analyses on the pair production cross section of a long-lived gluino in the mini-split model, assuming a 100% branching fraction for the gluino to decay into a quark-antiquark pair and the lightest neutralino. The gluino and neutralino masses are assumed to be 2400 GeV and 100 GeV, respectively and the gluino is treated as a neutral, non-interacting particle.
pdf png

DM summary plots

Scalar/pseudoscalar limits vs. M(Z')

95% CL observed (full-line) and expected (dashed-line) exclusion limits for the Pseudo-scalar model as a function of Mmed for different MET based DM searches from CMS. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for quark coupling of g_q = 1.0 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should be noted that an exclusion away from sigma / sigma_theory =1 only applies to coupling combinations that yield the same kinematic distributions as the benchmark model considered here.
95% CL observed (full-line) and expected (dashed-line) exclusion limits for the Scalar model as a function of Mmed for different MET based DM searches from CMS. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for quark coupling of g_q = 1.0 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should be noted that an exclusion away from sigma / sigma_theory =1 only applies to coupling combinations that yield the same kinematic distributions as the benchmark model considered here.

M(DM) vs M(Z')

Updates for LHCP 2020: update references, add resolved dijet+ISR jet and Run 2 dijet

caption plot
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.

gq

Updates for LHCP 2020: update references for some PASes to publications.

Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .

LeptonPhoton 2019

DM summary plots

caption plot
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.

EPS 2019

Dijet summary plots

Updates for EPS:

  • Add EXO-19-012 (dijet full Run 2, no scouting).

caption plot
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .

LHCP 2019

Dijet summary plots

Updates for LHCP:

  • Add EXO-18-012 (16+17 boosted dijet+ISR jet), EXO-17-027 (16 boosted dijet+ISR photon), and B2G -17-017 (Z'(ttbar)).
    • Comment: the Z'(ttbar) limits were derived for Z' widths of 1%, 10%, and 30%. The 1% limits are shown here; since they are not valid up to 10%, I cut them off at 5%. The two main differences from the EXO limits are (1) the intrinsic width for the signal templates is 1% rather than ~3% (for gq=0.25), and (2) the experimental resolution looks slightly better (maybe due to using a W mass constraint in the semileptonic channel?).
    • Comment 2: ATLAS makes the following claim in their DM grand summary paper, which I think can't possibly be right: "No limitation in sensitivity arises from large width resonances in the ttbar resonance analysis, as the background is constrained in dedicated control regions"
  • Consolidate some ATLAS limits from the same paper, to reclaim legend rows.
  • Remove EXO-16-056 (16 dijet). Superseded by EXO-17-026 (16+17 dijet), though the limit curve begins slightly higher now.

caption plot
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The tt resonance analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 5%, the Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .

Moriond 2019

Dijet summary plots

caption plot
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown are indirect constraints on g'_q from the Υ and Z boson widths, which are valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .

January 2019

2016 data EXO summary bar chart

caption plot
A bar chart representing the mass scale reach of CMS EXO analyses using data collected in 2016 for a selected set of new physics phenomena.
pdf png svg (clickable)

ICHEP 2018

Dark Matter Summary plots

caption plot
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet searches and different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion ofthe different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for different MET based DM searches from CMS in the lepto-phobic Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.25 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion ofthe different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet and di-lepton searches from CMS in the Axial-vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.1, lepton coupling gl = 0.1, and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed and expected exclusion regions in mMed-mDM plane for di-jet and di-lepton searches from CMS in the Vector model. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for a universal quark coupling of g_q = 0.1, lepton coupling gl = 0.01, and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should also be noted that the absolute exclusion of the different searches as well as their relative importance, will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the exclusion regions, relic density contours, and unitarity curve shown in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or model.
95% CL observed (full-line) and expected (dashed-line) exclusion limits for the Pseudo-scalar model as a function of Mmed for different MET based DM searches from CMS. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for quark coupling of g_q = 1.0 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should be noted that an exclusion away from sigma / sigma_theory =1 only applies to coupling combinations that yield the same kinematic distributions as the benchmark model considered here.
95% CL observed (full-line) and expected (dashed-line) exclusion limits for the Scalar model as a function of Mmed for different MET based DM searches from CMS. Following the recommendation of the LHC DM working group ([arXiv:1603.04156], [arXiv:1703.05703]), the exclusions are computed for quark coupling of g_q = 1.0 and for a DM coupling of gDM = 1.0. It should be noted that an exclusion away from sigma / sigma_theory =1 only applies to coupling combinations that yield the same kinematic distributions as the benchmark model considered here.
A comparison of CMS results to the mDM-sigma_SD plane. Unlike in the mass-mass plane, the limits are shown at 90% CL. The CMS contour in the SD plane is for an Axial-vector mediator, Dirac DM and couplings g_q = 0.25 and gDM = 1.0. The SD exclusion contour is compared with limits from PICASSO and PICO experiments, the IceCube limit for the ttbar, bbbar annihilation channels, and the Super-Kamiokande limit for the bbbar annihilation channel. It should be noted that the CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density and also the absolute exclusion of the different CMS searches as well as their relative importance will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the shown CMS exclusion regions in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.
A comparison of CMS results to the mDM-sigma_SI plane . Unlike in the mass-mass plane, the limits are shown at 90% CL. The CMS contour in the SI plane is for a Vector mediator, Dirac DM and couplings g_q = 0.25 and gDM = 1.0. The CMS SI exclusion contour is compared with the XENON1T 2017, LUX 2016, PandaX -II 2016 , CDMSLite 2015 and CRESST-II 2015 limits, which constitutes the strongest documented constraints in the shown mass range. It should be noted that the CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density and also the absolute exclusion of the different CMS searches as well as their relative importance will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the shown CMS exclusion regions in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models..
A comparison of CMS results to the mDM-sigma_SI plane . Unlike in the mass-mass plane, the limits are shown at 90% CL. The CMS contour in the SI plane is for a Scalar mediator, Dirac DM and couplings g_q = 0.25 and gDM = 1.0. The CMS SI exclusion contour is compared with the XENON1T 2017, LUX 2016, PandaX -II 2016 , CDMSLite 2015 and CRESST-II 2015 limits, which constitutes the strongest documented constraints in the shown mass range. It should be noted that the CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density and also the absolute exclusion of the different CMS searches as well as their relative importance will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the shown CMS exclusion regions in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.
A comparison of CMS results exclusion limits to the velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section upper limits from Fermi-LAT. Unlike in the mass-mass plane, the limits are shown at 90% CL. The CMS contours are for a Pseudoscalar mediator, Dirac DM and couplings g_q = 0.25 and gDM = 1.0. It should be noted that the CMS limits do not include a constraint on the relic density and also the absolute exclusion of the different CMS searches as well as their relative importance will strongly depend on the chosen coupling and model scenario. Therefore, the shown CMS exclusion regions in this plot are not applicable to other choices of coupling values or models.

LHCP 2018

Leptoquark summary

caption plot
Overview of CMS leptoquark 95% CL mass exclusion limits.

Dijet summary plots

Changes for LHCP since Moriond: the broad dijet result has been added, the CMS 2016 dijet reference (EXO-16-056) has been set to arXiv:1806.00843, and the ATLAS TLA dijet result has been updated to the published result.

caption plot
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown is an indirect constraint on g'_q from the Z boson width, which is valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ and Broad Dijet, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Broad Dijet analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′≲ 30%, and the Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.

Moriond 2018

Long-lived summary plots

caption plot
Observed and expected gluino mass exclusions at 95% CL (indicated, respectively, by solid and dashed contours) for simplified models that assume the production of pairs of long-lived gluinos that each form an R-hadron bound state, before decaying via highly virtual light-flavour squarks to the neutralino and a quark-antiquark pair. The mass exclusions are presented as a function of the gluino proper decay length cτ and lifetime τ. The mass exclusions are shown as obtained from three searches under various model assumptions, as indicated in the figure legend. The charge suppressed scenario assumes that the R-hadron does not undergo nuclear interactions with the detector material. The fraction f_g ̃g specifies the probability that the R-hadron is formed as a gluino-gluon bound state. Exclusions for scenarios that involve the prompt decay of the gluino or a stable gluino are also indicated by circular markers.

Dijet summary plots

caption plot
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various CMS dijet analyses. The expected limits are shown in dashed lines, and the corresponding observed limits are shown in solid lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%.
Limits on the universal coupling g'_q between a leptophobic Z′ boson and quarks [arXiv:1611.03568] from various dijet analyses from CMS, ATLAS, CDF, and UA2. The limits are shown in solid lines, with the excluded area above the lines. The hashed areas show the direction of the excluded area from the observed limits. The grey dashed lines show the g'_q values at fixed values of Γ_Z′/M_Z′. Most of the analyses, with the exception of Dijet χ, assume that the intrinsic width is negligible compared to the experimental resolution, and hence are valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 10%. The Dijet χ analysis is valid for Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ ≲ 100%. Also shown is an indirect constraint on g'_q from the Z boson width, which is valid for all values of Γ_Z′ /M_Z′ .
Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng Axial_METX_Dilepton_Multijet_Scenario1_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 228.9 K 2018-07-04 - 00:44 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng Axial_METX_Dilepton_Multijet_Scenario2_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 197.8 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng Axial_METX_Scenario1_Summary.png r3 r2 r1 manage 184.0 K 2018-07-04 - 00:46 MarcoTrovato  
PDFpdf CMS_LQ_summary.pdf r2 r1 manage 77.1 K 2018-06-05 - 19:19 IvanMikulec  
PNGpng CMS_LQ_summary.png r2 r1 manage 256.4 K 2018-06-05 - 19:19 IvanMikulec  
PDFpdf CurrentBarChartVersion_v3.pdf r1 manage 76.8 K 2020-05-13 - 00:21 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PNGpng CurrentBarChartVersion_v3.png r1 manage 290.0 K 2020-05-13 - 00:21 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PDFpdf CurrentBarChartVersion_v4.pdf r1 manage 77.7 K 2020-05-19 - 06:45 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PNGpng CurrentBarChartVersion_v4.png r1 manage 313.8 K 2020-05-19 - 06:45 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg CurrentBarChartVersion_v4.svg r1 manage 620.7 K 2020-05-19 - 06:45 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PDFpdf CurrentBarChartVersion_v5.pdf r1 manage 79.8 K 2020-05-22 - 17:44 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PNGpng CurrentBarChartVersion_v5.png r1 manage 340.3 K 2020-05-22 - 17:43 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg CurrentBarChartVersion_v5.svg r1 manage 648.7 K 2020-05-22 - 17:44 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PDFpdf CurrentBarChartVersion_v6.pdf r1 manage 79.8 K 2020-05-24 - 18:07 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PNGpng CurrentBarChartVersion_v6.png r1 manage 341.5 K 2020-05-24 - 18:07 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg CurrentBarChartVersion_v6.svg r1 manage 649.3 K 2020-05-24 - 18:07 JoseDavidRuizAlvarez  
PDFpdf CurrentBarChartVersion_v7.pdf r1 manage 81.0 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PNGpng CurrentBarChartVersion_v7.png r1 manage 344.4 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg CurrentBarChartVersion_v7.svg r1 manage 647.4 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PDFpdf EXO_barchart_Jan19.pdf r2 r1 manage 67.7 K 2019-05-09 - 19:50 IvanMikulec  
PNGpng EXO_barchart_Jan19.png r2 r1 manage 198.4 K 2019-05-09 - 19:51 IvanMikulec  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg EXO_barchart_Jan19.svg r2 r1 manage 420.5 K 2019-05-09 - 19:52 IvanMikulec  
PDFpdf Hadronic_LL_Summary_2400.pdf r7 r6 r5 r4 r3 manage 16.6 K 2021-03-16 - 16:25 MatthewDanielCitron  
PNGpng Hadronic_LL_Summary_2400.png r6 r5 r4 r3 r2 manage 23.6 K 2021-03-16 - 16:25 MatthewDanielCitron  
PDFpdf Hadronic_LL_Summary_2400_2020.pdf r1 manage 16.6 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PNGpng Hadronic_LL_Summary_2400_2020.png r1 manage 23.3 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PNGpng ID_CMSID_90_Summary.png r3 r2 r1 manage 163.3 K 2018-07-04 - 00:56 MarcoTrovato  
PDFpdf LLPGluinoSummary.pdf r1 manage 843.8 K 2018-03-07 - 18:05 IvanMikulec  
PNGpng LLPGluinoSummary.png r1 manage 137.6 K 2018-06-01 - 19:15 IvanMikulec  
Unknown file formateps MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.eps r1 manage 94.7 K 2019-08-08 - 01:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.pdf r1 manage 131.4 K 2019-08-08 - 01:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.png r1 manage 577.7 K 2019-08-08 - 01:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.eps r1 manage 98.0 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 378.0 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 639.5 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_moriond2020.pdf r1 manage 377.7 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_moriond2020.png r1 manage 596.2 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A1_logx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.pdf r2 r1 manage 367.0 K 2020-05-13 - 23:15 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A1_logx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.png r2 r1 manage 581.2 K 2020-05-13 - 23:15 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 231.2 K 2020-04-28 - 04:59 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 466.4 K 2020-04-28 - 04:59 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2020.eps r1 manage 65.8 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2020.pdf r1 manage 189.4 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2020.png r1 manage 499.9 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2021.pdf r1 manage 231.5 K 2021-03-18 - 23:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_A2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2021.png r1 manage 509.0 K 2021-03-18 - 23:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.eps r1 manage 83.8 K 2019-08-08 - 01:45 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.pdf r1 manage 124.5 K 2019-08-08 - 01:45 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_dijet_lp2019.png r1 manage 503.0 K 2019-08-08 - 01:45 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.eps r1 manage 86.9 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 371.4 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 551.9 K 2020-05-13 - 21:52 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_moriond2020.eps r1 manage 86.9 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_moriond2020.pdf r1 manage 371.1 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V1_linearx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_moriond2020.png r1 manage 521.4 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V1_logx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.pdf r2 r1 manage 366.4 K 2020-05-13 - 23:15 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V1_logx_boosted_dijet_isrj_dijetbb_trijet_dijet_lhcp2020.png r2 r1 manage 521.3 K 2020-05-13 - 23:15 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 178.3 K 2020-04-28 - 04:59 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 432.7 K 2020-04-28 - 04:59 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2020.eps r1 manage 48.6 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2020.pdf r1 manage 159.6 K 2020-04-06 - 13:41 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2021.pdf r1 manage 178.6 K 2021-03-18 - 23:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng MM_V2_linearx_dilepton_dijet_boosted_dijet_isrj_moriond2021.png r1 manage 457.5 K 2021-03-18 - 23:54 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng Pseudo_METX_Summary_obsnexp.png r2 r1 manage 187.0 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PDFpdf Pseudo_METX_Summary_obsnexp_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 17.9 K 2020-05-22 - 00:31 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng Pseudo_METX_Summary_obsnexp_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 410.1 K 2020-05-22 - 00:31 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng SD_CMSDD_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 211.5 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng SIS_CMSDD_Summary.png r1 manage 173.6 K 2018-07-02 - 22:13 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng SI_CMSDD_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 218.7 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng Scalar_METX_Summary_obsnexp.png r2 r1 manage 180.9 K 2018-07-04 - 00:50 MarcoTrovato  
PDFpdf Scalar_METX_Summary_obsnexp_lhcp2020.pdf r1 manage 17.9 K 2020-05-22 - 00:31 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng Scalar_METX_Summary_obsnexp_lhcp2020.png r1 manage 387.9 K 2020-05-22 - 00:31 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng Vector_METX_Dilepton_Multijet_Scenario1_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 207.3 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng Vector_METX_Dilepton_Multijet_Scenario2_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 178.2 K 2018-07-04 - 00:41 MarcoTrovato  
PNGpng Vector_METX_Scenario1_Summary.png r2 r1 manage 178.0 K 2018-07-04 - 00:49 MarcoTrovato  
PDFpdf barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL.pdf r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 55.5 K 2020-05-22 - 19:45 JulietteAlimena  
PNGpng barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL.png r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 189.8 K 2020-05-22 - 19:46 JulietteAlimena  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL.svg r4 r3 r2 r1 manage 328.5 K 2020-05-22 - 19:46 JulietteAlimena  
PDFpdf barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL_v2.pdf r1 manage 54.6 K 2021-03-19 - 21:44 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PNGpng barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL_v2.png r1 manage 185.3 K 2021-03-19 - 21:44 MichaelDavidKrohn  
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)svg barplot_RPV_RPC_OLL_v2.svg r1 manage 304.2 K 2021-03-19 - 21:45 MichaelDavidKrohn  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_eps2019_linearx_logy.png r2 r1 manage 214.3 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_all_2c_eps2019_logx_logy.eps r2 r1 manage 43.2 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_eps2019_logx_logy.pdf r2 r1 manage 40.6 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_eps2019_logx_logy.png r2 r1 manage 233.0 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2019_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 34.3 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2019_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 213.4 K 2019-05-20 - 19:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2019_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 40.4 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2019_logx_logy.png r1 manage 231.9 K 2019-05-20 - 19:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.eps r1 manage 39.2 K 2020-05-13 - 22:10 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 34.6 K 2020-05-13 - 22:10 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 225.1 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_logx_logy.eps r1 manage 43.7 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 40.8 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_lhcp2020_logx_logy.png r1 manage 242.8 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 30.8 K 2018-03-17 - 00:29 IvanMikulec  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_logx_logy.png r1 manage 169.1 K 2018-06-01 - 19:15 IvanMikulec  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_moriond19_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 33.8 K 2019-04-30 - 04:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_moriond19_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 256.6 K 2019-04-30 - 04:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_moriond19_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 39.9 K 2019-04-30 - 04:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_moriond19_logx_logy.png r1 manage 278.2 K 2019-04-30 - 04:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_moriond2020_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 223.4 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_all_2c_moriond2020_logx_logy.eps r1 manage 43.7 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_all_2c_moriond2020_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 40.8 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_all_2c_moriond2020_logx_logy.png r1 manage 241.1 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_eps2019_linearx_logy.eps r2 r1 manage 50.9 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_eps2019_linearx_logy.pdf r2 r1 manage 46.2 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_eps2019_linearx_logy.png r2 r1 manage 301.6 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_eps2019_logx_logy.eps r2 r1 manage 49.0 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_eps2019_logx_logy.pdf r2 r1 manage 45.6 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_eps2019_logx_logy.png r2 r1 manage 301.5 K 2019-07-06 - 00:57 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_lhcp2019_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 45.8 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_lhcp2019_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 293.1 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_lhcp2019_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 45.2 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_lhcp2019_logx_logy.png r1 manage 297.1 K 2019-05-20 - 19:58 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.eps r1 manage 51.9 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 46.6 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 305.7 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_logx_logy.eps r1 manage 50.0 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 45.8 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_lhcp2020_logx_logy.png r1 manage 308.5 K 2020-05-13 - 22:09 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 34.9 K 2018-03-17 - 00:29 IvanMikulec  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_logx_logy.png r1 manage 194.5 K 2018-06-01 - 19:15 IvanMikulec  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_moriond19_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 44.3 K 2019-03-19 - 14:01 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_moriond19_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 282.0 K 2019-03-19 - 14:01 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_moriond19_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 43.6 K 2019-03-19 - 14:01 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_moriond19_logx_logy.png r1 manage 280.0 K 2019-03-19 - 14:01 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_moriond2020_linearx_logy.eps r1 manage 51.9 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_moriond2020_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 46.6 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_moriond2020_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 304.6 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
Unknown file formateps c_gq_cms_moriond2020_logx_logy.eps r1 manage 50.0 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf c_gq_cms_moriond2020_logx_logy.pdf r1 manage 45.8 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng c_gq_cms_moriond2020_logx_logy.png r1 manage 307.2 K 2020-04-06 - 13:40 DavidRenHwaYu  
PDFpdf fig2_c_gq_cms_linearx_logy.pdf r1 manage 35.8 K 2018-03-17 - 17:08 DavidRenHwaYu  
PNGpng fig2_c_gq_cms_linearx_logy.png r1 manage 192.5 K 2018-06-01 - 19:15 IvanMikulec  
PDFpdf gq_all_2c_logx_logy_LHCP2018.pdf r1 manage 35.0 K 2018-06-05 - 14:39 DavidRenHwaYu Dijet g_q summary plots for LHCP2018
PNGpng gq_all_2c_logx_logy_LHCP2018.png r2 r1 manage 152.7 K 2018-06-05 - 14:41 DavidRenHwaYu g_q summary plots for LHC2018 (png versions)
PDFpdf gq_cms_linearx_logy_LHCP2018.pdf r1 manage 41.5 K 2018-06-05 - 14:39 DavidRenHwaYu Dijet g_q summary plots for LHCP2018
PNGpng gq_cms_linearx_logy_LHCP2018.png r2 r1 manage 191.2 K 2018-06-05 - 14:41 DavidRenHwaYu g_q summary plots for LHC2018 (png versions)
PDFpdf gq_cms_logx_logy_LHCP2018.pdf r1 manage 40.0 K 2018-06-05 - 14:39 DavidRenHwaYu Dijet g_q summary plots for LHCP2018
PNGpng gq_cms_logx_logy_LHCP2018.png r2 r1 manage 192.1 K 2018-06-05 - 14:41 DavidRenHwaYu g_q summary plots for LHC2018 (png versions)
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r51 < r50 < r49 < r48 < r47 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r51 - 2021-03-19 - MichaelDavidKrohn
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    CMSPublic All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback