SA1 Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: DJRA1.1.1
Title: DJRA1.1.1 Compute Area Work Plan and Status Report Doc. identifier: EMI_DJRA1.1.1_v06.odt
Author(s): Massimo Sgaravatto Due date: __

Identification of the reviewer
Name: Michele Carpene' Affiliation: CINECA EMI Activity/External project or Institute: SA1/SA2

Review date 10/15/2010
Author(s) revision date 08/31/2010
Reviewer acceptance date 10/15/2010

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/EMI/EMIJRA1T2DJRA111/EMI_DJRA1.1.1_v06.cineca.odt

General comments

Some missing acronyms and references

Added

More details to provide

Added

Conclusions to add at the end of the doc

Chapter with conclusions added

Replies to the comments done in the doc in the attached doc

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Nothing to add

Detailed comments on the content

N Page Section Observations and Replies Is Addressed?
1 3 null Missing authors and reviewers    
      Ok, done    
2 10 3.1 Missing acronyms and references    
3 12 3.3 Maybe to use different colors for components covered by EMI would be helpful.    
      Ok, picture redone    
4 13 3.3 a sentence has been duplicated    
      Ok, fixed    
5 14 3.3 "Normal" means "Serial"    
      In gLite terminology, it is called Normal. At any rate I changed into Serial/Normal    
6 18 3.5.1 Provide more informations on jobs scripts generation/correct "performs" verb    
      I discussed this with Bernd, who thinks the current text is enough. He thinks it is not needed to include your text    
7 18 3.5.2 Provide more details/Missing reference also here    
      Ok, done    
8 24 4.2 It is not clear if the evolution plans are related to the harmonization plans and in which ways.    
      Explained what these plans are targeted for    
9 24 4.2.2 correct "in particolar"/ "to then be able"? what it means?    
      Ok, fixed    
10 25 4.2.3 feedback mechanism?    
      Not fully understood what is comment here. In the text I think it is explained what is the problem (along with the relevant use-case), and the proposed solution. At any rate the text has been improved to better explain the whole stuff    
11 26 4.2.5 conclusions?    
      Ok, chapter with conclusions added    

-- FloridaEstrella - 01-Oct-2010

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date WhoSorted ascending Comment
Unknown file formatodt EMI_DJRA1.1.1_v06.cineca_replies.odt r1 manage 160.4 K 2010-11-08 - 15:59 MassimoSgaravatto Replies to SA1 review
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r7 < r6 < r5 < r4 < r3 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r7 - 2010-11-08 - MassimoSgaravatto
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback