SA2 Deliverable Review Form

General comments

General comment on the whole document

A work plan should have a time line with all the milestones or a table with all the milestones, possibly with some details on the level of the delivered product. Please add a time chart or a time table inside the document or as annex.

Morris: a plan has been added marking EMI-1 as the major milestone. In general the activities of the integration deliverable have been aligned with the timeline of State-of-the-art, EMI-0, and EMI-1.

For each action/task there should be a clear explanation of which product team/developer is in charge for developing, testing and releasing it. Follow the guidelines and example available here that Maria has added (now that we have seen that the plans needed these guidelines). SA2 is glad to clarify the guidelines and support the authors of the document (not in writing it) just contact us.

Morris: The integration task is not like a technical work plan for the major technical areas compute, security, infrastructure, data. In contrast, it is an overlay of existing work within these areas and as such this document can be not directly structured like them.

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/EMI/AreaWorkPlanTPL

Morris: Taken into account as best as possible.

• EMI_JRA1.6.1_v4-1_maria.doc: EMI_JRA1.6.1_v4-1_maria.doc

• EMI_JRA1.6.1_v4-1_jozef.docx: EMI_JRA1.6.1_v4-1_jozef.docx