Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: D2.2.1
Title: DNA2.2.1 Training Plan Doc. identifier: EMI-DNA2.2.2_v0.5.doc
Author(s): K. Cassidy Due date: 28/10/11

Identification of the reviewer
Name: F. Estrella Affiliation: CERN EMI Activity/External project or Institute: NA1

Review date mm/dd/yyyy
Author(s) revision date mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

General comments

. The training "plan" is missing. I would like to see what is the goal of the training activity? What do we want to achieve at the end of Matterhorn? at the end of EMI? And clearly identify the steps and expected outcome of each step to reach that goal.
. What is NA2 Training doing to promote a more holistic EMI training activity
. What is NA2 Training doing to promote the major developments in EMI eg EMI-ES.
. Try to make the future plans as specific and concrete as possible.
. NA2 Training must take a more pro-active role in proposing in/out events in line with current project plans eg Matterhorn roadmap, technical development plans, sustainability plans. For instance NA2 Training can take the lead in pushing for the EPEL packaging WS, ff interest during AHM Padova.

tracked v0.5 with Florida's comments

03/11/11:
Further to my comments below and having scanned DNA222's past incarnation DNA221 and following the procedure on periodically updated deliverable [1], can Kathyrn please consider:
. Adding a Training Strategy chapter
. To include metrics and deviations to agreed plans, if any, to the Status Report. Would it be possible to rename Progress on Training Plan to Status Report on Training Plan?
. Adding Measuring Success and Metrics.

16/11/11:
I have additional comments on v0.6 mostly on the Training Strategy and Future Plans. Btw, the chapter numbers have disappeared (?).
To make reviewing easier, I have accepted all changes and removed all comments on v0.6

tracked v0.6 with Florida's comments

30/11/11:
I have additional comments on v0.7. To make reviewing easier, I have accepted all changes and removed all comments on v0.7

tracked v0.7 with Florida's comments

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N Page Section Observations and Replies Is Addressed?
1 xx x.y Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date    
2          
3          
4          

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- FloridaEstrella - 24-Oct-2011

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
Microsoft Word filedoc EMI-DNA2.2.2_v0.5-FE.doc r1 manage 567.0 K 2011-10-27 - 17:30 UnknownUser  
Microsoft Word filedoc EMI-DNA2.2.2_v0.6_FE.doc r1 manage 758.5 K 2011-11-16 - 13:29 UnknownUser  
Microsoft Word filedoc EMI-DNA2.2.2_v0.7_FE.doc r1 manage 797.0 K 2011-11-30 - 12:16 UnknownUser  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r5 - 2011-11-30 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback