Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: D2.3.2
Title: DNA2.3.2 Dissemination and Use of Knowledge Plan Doc. identifier: EMI_DNA2.3.2_TOC.docx
Author(s): P. Salente, et. al. Due date:

Identification of the reviewer
Name: F. Estrella Affiliation: CERN EMI Activity/External project or Institute: NA1

Review date mm/dd/yyyy
Author(s) revision date mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

General comments

DNA232 should include
. Status Report: what has been done to date wrt to planned NA2 objectives, wrt project objectives; deviation from agreed plans. To ease readability, it is suggested to have a dedicated chapter on this instead of spreading the information across different chapters.
. Dissemination and Use of Knowledge Strategy and Plan: the strategy and corresponding the plan to implement the strategy are still largely missing. This dates back to my comments on DNA232's previous incarnation DNA231.
. Events: EMI members are participating to a large number of events, see QRs. I understand some of these are not NA2 organised or NA2 attended. However, I think it is important to include these in this document.
. EC recommendations on dissemination, outreach, user community expansion, etc: How these are being implemented and folded into the Dissemination and Outreach strategy/plan.
. Outreach to business communities and Public Relations: Are these no longer part of the strategy?
. Publications: main stream articles and scientific publications.
. Metrics and effectiveness

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N Page Section Observations and Replies Is Addressed?
1 xx x.y Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date    
2          
3          
4          

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- FloridaEstrella - 04-Nov-2011

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 2011-11-04 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback