SA2 Deliverable Review Form
Identification of the deliverable or milestone |
Project: EMI |
Deliverable or milestone identifier: DSA1.3.1 |
Title: DSA1.3.1 - Software Maintenance Quality Control Report |
Doc. identifier: EMI-D3.3.1-Software_Maintenance_Quality_Control_Report-v1.4.odt |
Author(s): G. Fiameni |
Due date: __ |
Identification of the reviewer |
Name: A Shiraz Memon |
Affiliation: JUELICH EMI Activity/External project or Institute: JRA1 |
Review date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Author(s) revision date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Reviewer acceptance date |
mm/dd/yyyy |
Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/EMI/DeliverableDSA131/EMI-D3.3.1-Software_Maintenance_Quality_Control_Report-v1.4_maria.odt
General comments
The deliverable overall is good, however there are certain ambiguities and minor mistakes that needs to be addressed for the next version. The detailed comments on the content can be found inside the document.
Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)
Detailed comments on the content
Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described
N° |
Page |
Section |
Observations And Replies |
Is Addressed? |
1 |
xx |
x.y |
Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.
--
FloridaEstrella - 08-Nov-2010