SA2 Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: DSA1.3.1
Title: DSA1.3.1 - Software Maintenance Quality Control Report Doc. identifier: EMI-D3.3.1-Software_Maintenance_Quality_Control_Report-v1.4.odt
Author(s): G. Fiameni Due date: __

Identification of the reviewer
Name: M. Alandes Pradillo Affiliation: CERN EMI Activity/External project or Institute: SA2

Review date 02/11/1977
Author(s) revision date mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/EMI/DeliverableDSA131/EMI-D3.3.1-Software_Maintenance_Quality_Control_Report-v1.4_maria.odt

General comments

  • Document difficult to read since there are references to items in the reference table only containing the reference number without the title of the document, so the reader needs to visit the reference table very often.
  • The review should be done for the EMI-0 release. The author has tried to review EMI-1 which doesn't exist yet. Due to this, he comments on the fact that the review can't actually be done because EMI-1 is not available. I think the evaluation of EMI-0 and the current status of the relevant documents, whatever they are, can be included in this release.
  • The software release plan is reviewed when the deliverable isn't finished. I think it should have just mentioned this.

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N Page Section Observations Is Addressed?
1 xx x.y Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date    
2          
3          
4          

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- FloridaEstrella - 03-Nov-2010

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2010-11-15 - MariaALANDESPRADILLO
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback