KJRA1.1 Number of Adopted Open Standard Interfaces

Legend:
x(y): x - achieved; y -target

Trends from Q3

What does it mean when component A has adopted standard B?
  • Some examples around the Technical Objective Compute 1 (GLUE2 Integration)
    • For Q2 it was expected (i.e. target (1) ) that A-REX already publishes information in the GLUE2 schema format - That was achieved in Q2: 1(1)
    • For Q2 it was expected (i.e. target (1) ) that also CREAM publishes information in the GLUE2 schema format - That was not achieved in Q2: 0(1)
    • For Q2 it was not expected for VOMS to publish information in GLUE2 and is currently also not planned within EMI

What does it mean when components A, B have interoperable interfaces?

  • Some examples around the common adoption of the OGF Storage Resource Manager (SRM) interface
    • DPM (component A), StoRM (component B), and dCache (component C) all adopt the SRM interface and thus any SRM-compliant client (component D) can access these three systems (given correct security setups are in place) with the same standardized protocol.

Year 1

Q1: Not reported

Q2 Q2

Service/component PGI EMI-ES BES JSDL GLUE2.0 SAML XACML SRM HTTP(S) X.509 LDAP GRID FTP
A-REX   1(1) 1(1) 1(1)       1(1) 1(1) 1(1)  
ARGUS         1(1) 1(1)     1(1)    
BDII       1(1)         1(1) 1(1)  
CREAM     1(1) 0(1)       1(1) 1(1)    
dCache             1(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1)
DPM             1(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1)
FTS                 1(1)   1(1)
StoRM             1(1) 1(1) 1(1)    
UNICORE Compute   1(1) 1(1) 0(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1) 1(1)    
UVOS         1(1)     1(1) 1(1)    
VOMS         1(1)     1(1) 1(1)    
WMS     1(1) 0(1)       1(1) 1(1)    
Total   2(2) 4(4) 2(5) 4(4) 2(2) 3(3) 9(9) 12(12) 2(2) 3(3)
NB:
GLUE2 deviation is not considered crucial issue; KPI target expected to be reached in year 1.
Q3 Q3

Service/component PGI EMI-ES BES JSDL GLUE2.0 SAML XACML SRM HTTP(S) X.509 LDAP GRID FTP
A-REX   1(1) 1(1) 1(1)       1(1) 1(1) 1(1)  
ARGUS         1(1) 1(1)     1(1)    
BDII       1(1)         1(1) 1(1)  
CREAM     1(1) 0(1)       1(1) 1(1)    
dCache       1(1)     1(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1)
DPM       1(1)     1(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1)
FTS                 1(1)   1(1)
StoRM       1(1)     1(1) 1(1) 1(1)    
UNICORE Compute   1(1) 1(1) 1(1) 1(1) 1(1)   1(1) 1(1)    
UVOS         1(1)     1(1) 1(1)    
VOMS         1(1)     1(1) 1(1)    
WMS     1(1) 0(1)       1(1) 1(1)    
Total   2(2) 4(4) 6(8) 4(4) 2(2) 3(3) 9(9) 12(12) 2(2) 3(3)
Trend Diagram Q2->Q3 KJRA11-Q2Q3-Trend.png

Tracking

2011-03-04 : Morris add additional remarks to the Q2 KPIs as well as answers to some clarifiying overall questions

Topic attachments
I Attachment History Action Size Date Who Comment
PNGpng KJRA11-Q2Q3-Trend.png r1 manage 12.7 K 2011-05-04 - 23:44 UnknownUser  
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 2011-05-05 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback