PO comments to take into account, before review:

0. Milestone covers both tools and procedures (see milestone abstract). The latter is missing (only small mention under bug tracking).
1. Clearer distinction bw sw tools and infrastructure; taking comment (0) SA2 has delivered tools, infrastructure, procedures.
2. Each 1.2 artefact should include -short description- of who is using it, for what purpose and clear indication of wide-spread use within EMI. For instance this is done for EMI Building but not for EMI Testing.
3. Section 1.2 is missing the infrastructure and procedure
4. Infrastructure: ETICS and Integration Tesbed; both should be included

0. Link to repo incorrect
1. You only have 1 milestone (not milestones).
2. Add CDS URLS of DSA2* deliverables
3. Consistent orthography of product teams (you use different spellings, caps, etc)

My take on SA2:
SA2 has put in place a functional suite of quality assurance policies, tools, repositories and testbeds for EMI development and deployment.

If we follow your structure of (1) Summary and (2) Details

(1) Summary: A high level description -what- SA2 has put in place that is being using across the project to support the development and deployment activities in EMI.

(2) Details: Organise this according to the 4 types (policies, tools, repositories, testbeds); and for each type you identify the artefacts (what it is, who is using it, for what purpose, and clear indication of wide-spread use).


-- Main.FloridaEstrella - 17-May-2011
Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 2011-05-18 - unknown
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
or Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? use Discourse or Send feedback