Identification of the deliverable or milestone | |
---|---|
Project: EMI | Deliverable or milestone identifier: D5.3.2 |
Title: DJRA1.3.2 – Security Area Work Plan and Status Report | Doc. identifier: EMI-DJRA1.3.2_v0.3.odt |
Author(s): John White | Due date: __ |
Identification of the reviewer | ||
---|---|---|
Name: Andre Giesler | Affiliation: JUELICH | EMI Activity/External project or Institute: SA1/JRA1 |
Review date | 05/03/2011 |
Author(s) revision date | 05/04/2011 (Section 3) |
Reviewer acceptance date | mm/dd/yyyy |
N° | Page | Section | Observations and Replies | Is Addressed? |
1 | 9 | 3.3 | Missing bullet at The API definitions in C/C++ -- AndreGiesler - 02-May-20111 Added. -- JohnWhite - 04-May-2011 |
yes |
2 | 10 | 3.5 | The planning of the replacement of Unicore Uvos by VOMS-SAML is mentioned as an objective both in chapter 3.5 (Common attribute authority) and 3.6 (Reduction in components). Could be reduced to be mentioned in only one chapter. -- AndreGiesler - 02-May-20111 I have added the text to 3.6 "(as mentioned above as part of the Common Attribute Authority objective)" to point out the fact we realise this is reported in two places. -- JohnWhite - 04-May-2011 |
yes |
3 | As the work in the area goes this UVOS->VOMS gets looked at both from the point of view of a technical advance (common SAML profile everywhere) and a more "political" decision to reduce components to make the EU feel happy. Is this OK with you? -- JohnWhite - 04-May-2011 | yes |
N° | Page | Section | Observations and Replies | Is Addressed? |
1 | 9 | 2 | Maybe I'm overcorrect here, but the sentence 'Also the agreement on common SAML...' doesn't contain a verb -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
2 | 9 | 2 | Missing full stop at 'objectives in DNA1.3.1. eg. user ' ... e.g. user ... -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
3 | 9 | 2 | Two spaces at 'for a common set ' -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 16 | 4 | Two spaces at 'objectives, giving ' -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 17 | 4.3 | Spelling: dicsussions -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 18 | 4.3.3 | A minor issue, but since ARGUS integration in A-REX is mentioned in 4.3.3, A-REX could be also mentioned in introducing paragraph 4.3 (only HED is there mentioned) -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 20 | 4.8 | Correct the double quotes format at to access a ``Grid''”. -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 20 | 4.8 | Two spaces at by most Grid infrastructures -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 20 | 4.8 | Correct sentence: there are still identity federation requirement-gathering exercises still ongoing. -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 21 | 4.8.2.2 | As far as I know, the URC is not part of EMI and therefore not known in that document. I think only Hila and UCC should be mentioned here. "The development of a STS/AAI client-side library for UNICORE, useful for both HiLA, UCC and URC." -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |
|
4 | 22 | 4.9.3.1 | Correct order "It is not defined yet the if C++ library will be implemented " -- AndreGiesler - 19-May-20111 |