SA1 Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: D5.7.2
Title: DJRA1.7.2 - Software Development Quality Control Report Doc. identifier: DJRA1.7.2-TOC.pdf
Author(s): A. Ceccanti Due date: 190411

Identification of the reviewer
Name: F. Giacomini Affiliation: INFN EMI Activity/External project or Institute: SA1

Review date 2011-06-03
Author(s) revision date mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link

General comments

The document is acceptable. Minor comments are mentioned below.

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N Page Section Observations and Replies Is Addressed?
1 5 1.3 References R1: long url, http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1277533 is enough.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
2 8 2 Much work have been done -> Much work has been done
and and -> and
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
3 9 3.1 EMI-0 -> EMI 0
emi -> EMI
integration the mock RPM packaging tool -> integration of the mock ...
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
4 10 3.3.2 There are many ETICS plugins also for C/C++. There is no need to say that they exist mainly for Java.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
5 11 3.3.4 The definition of regression test is more general than the one given here. I would add "in this context" towards the beginning of the phrase.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
6 11 3.3.6 Significant effort have been put -> Significant effort has been put
Detailed figures on how certification reports availability and completeness -> Detailed figures on certification reports availability and completeness
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
7 13 4 May, 12th 2011 -> May 12th, 2011
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
8 15 Table 4 Some components have the version, some don't.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011

The names are the ones found in the release tracker, where some have the version and some don't.
-- AndreaCeccanti - 04-Jun-2011
DONE  
9 18 4.2.3 only in one third the verified components -> only in one third of the verified components
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  
10 19 4.2.4 is recommended -> it is recommended
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 03-Jun-2011
DONE  

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

-- FloridaEstrella - 20-Apr-2011

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2011-06-04 - AndreaCeccantiExCern
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback