DNA1.3.1 Review (Francesco)

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: DNA1.3.1
Title: DNA1.3.1 - Technical Development Plan Doc. identifier: EMI_DNA1.3.1_draft.docx
Author(s): Balazs Konya Due date: June 2010

Identification of the reviewer
Name: Francesco Giacomini Affiliation: INFN EMI Activity/External project or Institute: SA1

Review date 2010-11-04
Author(s) revision date ??/??/2010
Reviewer acceptance date ??/??/2010

Reviewed document (minor corrections)

General comments

The document is acceptable. The other comments (general and specific) are just suggestions for improvement and clarification.

The deliverable template is not fully followed, e.g. the references should be moved from the end of the document to within the introduction; the section "Application Area" is missing.

References are not real references.

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Detailed comments on the content

N Page Section Observations Is Addressed?
1 1 Abstract It's not the same text of the DoW.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
2 7 2.2 and Glossary There is no EMI glossary at http://www.eu-emi.eu/about/glossary/.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
3 8 3 What about summarizing the requirements here? just to give an idea of what we got at the beginning.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
4 8 3 Elaborate a little bit on what "well-established collaboration channels" are or will be soon in place.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
5 12/13 4 Some components (50 to 53) of the gLite Information System have evolution set to no, but I guess they would need to be ported to GLUE2.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
6 13 4 Why are Trustmanager and Util-java investigated for phase-out? to be replaced by the common authN library?
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
7 13 4 Why do we still need to investigate if LCAS and LCMAPS are to be phased-out? consequently also LCMAPS-plugins-c-pep should be phased-out at some point.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
8 13 4 Delegation Java has evolution set to no. But I guess it would be affected by the shift to SAML.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
9 14 4 Why is Argus EES mentioned explicitly and not the other Argus components? because its status is different?
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
10 16 5.1 I guess figure X means 1.
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
11 16 5.1 Second bullet: which "remaining two areas"?
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
12 18 5.2 In the table, what is the meaning of the Due date? end of development, release, other? I remind that, for example, if EMI-1 is due at M12 it means that the software needs to be ready at M10 (which is also a milestone for JRA1).
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
13 19 Technical Objectives of Data area Objective 3: does it refer to data transfers, i.e. as an alternative to GridFTP?
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 
14 19 Technical Objectives of Data area Objective 4: protocol "file" only for local access or also remote?
-- FrancescoGiacomini - 04-Nov-2010
 

-- BalazsKonya - 28-Oct-2010

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r7 | r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions...
Topic revision: r3 - 2010-11-05 - FrancescoGiacomini
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback