DSA132 JRA1 Deliverable Review Form

Identification of the deliverable or milestone
Project: EMI Deliverable or milestone identifier: D3.3.2
Title: DSA1.3.2 Software Maintenance Quality Control Report Doc. identifier: EMI-D3.3.2-Software_Maintenance_Quality_Control_Report_v1.2.odt
Author(s): G. Fiameni Due date: 03/03/2011

Identification of the reviewer
Name: Morris Riedel Affiliation: JUELICH EMI Activity/External project or Institute: JRA1

Review date 2011-03-03
Author(s) revision date mm/dd/yyyy
Reviewer acceptance date mm/dd/yyyy

Attach the reviewed document to the deliverable page, put here a link:

General comments

The document is overall in a good shape and I had only minor comments.

MR 040411: the document looks ok, only one minor point. In the meanwhile the situation looks slightly better for CREAM compared to the time of writing: "CREAM: the static, GLUE2 complaint, information will be provided in EMI 1 but dynamic one might be most likely not available due to unforeseen missing cooperation from partners within the gLite consortium." We perhaps need to rewrite this sentence putting it more positive. Unfortunately the agreements have been discussed without me in CC between Alberto DM and the necessary providers. I believe Alberto DM can finally summarize the negotiated aspects with providers and how it finally affects EMI 1. Otherwise, my comments have been addressed and the deliverable is good to go.

Additional recommendations (not affecting the document content, e.g. recommendation for future work)

Sometimes a bit more information in context might be useful, e.g. how suddently external people test internal software and how this is reflected in the procedures. This best effort is not something we can rely on - on the other hand it is good to have this as a complementary check (e.g. with VOMS, etc.).

Detailed comments on the content

According to the rules used track changes and comments in uploaded commented version.

Note 1: The reviewers must list here any observation they want to track explicitly and that require interaction with the authors
Alternatively all changes must be listed in the document itself using Word change tracking features (if you use Word)
Note 2: These comments have to be explicitly addressed by the authors and the action taken must be clearly described

N Page Section Observations and Replies Is Addressed?
1 xx x.y Sequence of comments and replies separated by twiki signature and date    
2          
3          
4          

Any other modification, spelling or grammatical corrections, etc must be done directly in the document using tracked changes or similar mechanisms that allows the authors to identify which correction is suggested.

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2011-04-04 - unknown
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback