PM6 - End of October 2010

General Information

Author

CINECA - Giuseppe Fiameni - g.fiameni@cinecaNOSPAMPLEASE.it

Date

October 29, 2010

Status

Approved

Tracking

November 3, 2010 - Giuseppe Fiameni - The reviews have been submitted to QA

Review of the Software Release Plan

Description

Report

  • Detailed report PDF

Change Requests

The list of the changes suggested/requested for this report follows:

  • to make the review more effective, define the tolerance range of positive checks for considering the associated EMI deliverables accepted. If the results fall within the range, the deliverable is accepted. Alternatively, the deliverable might be rejected because it does not meet the quality standards set out for the project.

The possibility of submitting change requests to the checklist structure (e.g. question text, number of questions) will be considered at a later stage of the project when more information on the effectiveness of the review checks should be available. A checklist is considered effective when the results it reports are in line with the quality of project's outcomes.

Review the Software Release Schedule

Description

Report

Change Requests

The list of the changes suggested/requested for this report follows:

  • to make the review more effective, define the tolerance range of positive checks for considering the associated EMI deliverables accepted. If the results fall within the range, the deliverable is accepted. Alternatively, the deliverable might be rejected because it does not meet the quality standards set for the project;
  • to facilitate the tracking of changes across different releases, it is strongly encouraged the adoption of a change management system to track changes life-cycle.

Review the Software Maintenance and Support Plan

Description

Report

Change Requests

The list of changes suggested/requested for this review follows:

  • to avoid overlaps in performance evaluation, consider to aggregate the quality metrics defined for this review with the project KPIs;
  • to make the review more effective, define the tolerance range of positive checks for considering the associated EMI deliverables accepted. If the results fall within the range, the deliverable is accepted. Alternatively, the deliverable might be rejected because it does not meet the quality standards set for the project.

Security Assessments

Description

Report

Change Requests

The list of the changes suggested/requested for this report follows:

  • to make the review more effective, define the tolerance range of positive checks for considering the associated EMI deliverables accepted. If the results fall within the range, the deliverable is accepted. Alternatively, the deliverable might be rejected because it does not meet the quality standards set for the project.

Comment from Quality Assurance

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r12 < r11 < r10 < r9 < r8 | Backlinks | Raw View | WYSIWYG | More topic actions
Topic revision: r12 - 2010-11-03 - GiuseppeGiacomoFiameniExCern
 
    • Cern Search Icon Cern Search
    • TWiki Search Icon TWiki Search
    • Google Search Icon Google Search

    EMI All webs login

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright & 2008-2020 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback