Introduction
Welcome to the FASER2 webpage. This page documents information related to the
FASER2 detector for the Forwards Physics Facility (FPF). FASER2 is primarily focused on searching for exotic and long-lived beyond the Standard Model particles, which, along with other motivations, are possible candidates for Dark Matter.
FASER2 is a detector proposed to be housed in the FPF. It's physics goals are similar to that of the existing
FASER (ForwArd Search ExpeRiment)
, however although FASER is already set to probe new parameter space in the search for BSM physics the overall size of FASER is been heavily constrained by the available space underground. This restricts the size of the possible decay volume and therefore sensitivity to various new physics models, which for many representative BSM models is directly related to the length and radius of the decay volume.
This strongly motivates the case for an enlarged detector, FASER2, which would be housed in the dedicated cavern of the FPF where significantly more space is available.
Contact information and useful links
Contact:
Publications:
Meetings
Regular meetings are held every other Thursday at 1pm CERN time.
Meetings can be found in the
FASER2 indico category
.
Recent meetings
Physics Priorities and Milestones
FASER2 is expected to have sensitivity to a number of physics models not accessible to FASER, as summarised in this table from the
FASER Physics Reach Paper
:
The larger volume of FASER2 and the richer phenomenology means that there are several important design considerations:
- Larger aperture imposes strong restrictions on possible magnet technology.
- Larger radius means being on-axis is less important.
- More LLP decay channel means particle ID will be important.
- A larger detector means a larger background rate, may required different detector technology.
- More sophisticated signal reconstruction strongly desirable (mass and pointing).
- Link to FASERν2 - need to be able to measure muon charge (and momentum) from (τ and μ) neutrino interactions.
Milestones:
- FPF5: 15-16th Nov 2022
- P5 committee?: Q3 2022?
- CDR: Q1 2023
- LHCC discussion? Q2 2023
HL-LHC timeline:
Activity areas
Activity area |
Sub-area |
Responsible |
Comments |
Magnet |
|
Jamie/Hide |
|
Tracker |
SciFi |
Sune |
|
Other R&D |
Monica |
|
Interface Tracker |
SCT |
Hide/Yosuke |
|
Scintillator |
|
Sune |
|
Calorimeter |
Dual-readout |
Josh, Iacopo |
|
Support structures |
|
|
|
TDAQ |
|
Anna/Claire |
|
Physics Sim studies |
Size/Shape |
Josh/Alan/Olivier |
|
Physics signatures |
Anna/Monica |
|
Generation |
Josh/Carl |
|
Person power
Open studies
Study |
Responsible |
Timescale |
Comments |
Status |
Magnet aperture |
Josh/Olivier |
Nov 2022 |
FORESEE |
In progress |
Magnet manufacturer |
Jamie/Hide/Monica/Alan/Anna |
Nov 2022 |
FORESEE |
In progress |
Overall detector layout |
Josh/Olivier |
Nov 2022 |
FORESEE |
In progress |
Tracker pT resolution |
Yosuke |
Dec 2022 |
Important for FASERnu2 but also mass reco |
Not started |
Trigger rate / deadtime |
Anna / Claire |
Dec 2022 |
|
Not started |
Use of old SCT modules |
Hide |
Dec 2022 |
Radiation study etc.. |
Not started |
Usefulness of timing |
TBD |
Dec 2022 |
|
Not started |
Possibility of mass reco |
Alan/Olivier |
Dec 2022 |
Using ACTS |
Not started |
Pointing capability |
Alan/Olivier |
Dec 2022 |
Using ACTS |
Not started |
SciFi specs. |
Sune |
Dec 2022 |
Number of layers, etc… |
Not started |
Calorimeter requirements |
Josh/Iacopo |
Dec 2022 |
|
Early stages |
Muons system requirements |
|
Jan 2023 |
|
Not started |
Baseline Geometry
A possible FASER2 geometry very similar to FASER but with larger dimensions was already explored in the
LoI
,
Technical Proposal
and
Physics Reach
publications from FASER.
This geometry had a decay volume of dimensions: Length=5m, Diameter=2m. This results in 4 orders of magnitude improvement in sensitivity reach and the angular acceptance of of all neutral pions goes from 0.6% in FASER to 10% in FASER2. It also improves sensitivities to LLPs produced in decays of heavy mesons and in general improves sensitivity to larger LLP masses.
However, further investigations of the available technology have indicated that such long and wide-aperture superconducting magnets are infeasible for the expected cost envelope for FASER2. Therefore, several other proposals have been considered for slightly reduced size and different shape magnet apertures have been studied which look promising. As a result, an updated baseline FASER2 geometry has been defined, as shown in the figure below:
This new baseline uses a single magnet, it does not immerse the decay volume in a magnetic field and in general has a significantly reduced length of magnetic field. However, the charged particle separations required still appear to be feasible due to the longer detector length.
The baseline has a rectangular aperture of 1m x 3m in the transverse plane and the decay volume is 10m long. The effect of different scenarios on the Dark Higgs reach is shown in the following figure, the new baseline scenario corresponds to the magenta dashed line ("R1 L=10m X=3m Y=1m"), where it can be seen that the expected sensitivity is similar to that of the old default FASER2 geometry shown in dark red ("F2 L=5m D=2m"):
Tools
FORESEE
Developed by Felix Kling and Sebastian Trojanowski, FORESEE (FORward Experiment SEnsitivity Estimator) is a package for simulating the expected sensitivity reach of experiments placed in the far-forward direction from the proton-proton interaction point to new physics models. It can also be used to create
HepMC files of these models for input into e.g. Geant4 simulations.
Simple FORESEE+Geant4 simulation
To test different magnet and detector geometries the FORESEE package was slightly adapted to produce
HepMC output files and a platform for creating simple Geant4 geometries has been developed for FASER2 R&D studies:
Detector technologies
Magnet
Add magnet resources/studies here
Add magnet resources/studies here
Dual-readout calorimeter
Add dual-readout resources/studies here
Background estimates
TODO: Add FLUKA estimates of the muon flux as a function of position in the FPF. Can be used for background and trigger studies.
Links
--
JoshMcFayden - 2022-10-11