Introduction
More than 150 million events were recorded during the week of test beam data. The details of the runs are recorded in the
google spreadsheet
and an overview of the data is also given in the presentations
here
. The raw data files can be found in
/eos/project/f/faser-commissioning/TestBeamData/
and
/eos/experiment/faser/raw/TestBeam2021/
while reconstructed data can be found in
/eos/project/f/faser-commissioning/Reconstruction/
and simulations in
/eos/project/f/faser-commissioning/Simulation/TestBeam/
.
The spreadsheet detailing the simulation samples can be found in this
google doc
.
Paper draft
Overleaf
link.
Organization
Meetings will be held bi-weekly starting on August 25 with agenda's in
Indico
. Announcements will take place on the "faser-test-beam@cern.ch" mailing list while discussions should mostly be held in the
mattermost channel
.
Analysis codes and scripts should be organized in the
gitlab
area. Please contact Brian if you cannot create your own repository in that group. Ntuples and other data files can be shared in suitable subdirectories in
/eos/project/f/faser-commissioning/TestBeamAnalysis/
Analysis topics
General topics
PMT Reconstruction (People: Eric, Deion)
- Waveform fit optimization and charge extraction
Track Reconstruction (People: Dave, Andrea)
- Efficient track reconstruction
- Optimization for multi-track events
Good events selection (People: )
- Single good track definition
- Cosmic suppression
Calorimetry
Calorimeter response and energy scale (People: Deion, Lottie, Carl, Monica)
- Absolute energy scale and linearity based on electron beam
- Corrections for preshower response
- Sharing/leakage between modules
- Energy resolution
- Comparison to simulation
Cross calibration from muons to electrons (People: Deion, Lottie, Carl, Monica)
- Precisely fit muon (MIP) and electron signal under same conditions to obtain EM equivalent scale
- To be used for setting absolute energy scale in TI12
Gain dependence on HV (People: Friedemann)
- Comparison between particle and LED response vs HV
- Comparison to lab measurements
of the calorimeter PMTs
- Investigate if there are non-linearity visible at the highest energy/lowest gain
Preshower response (People: Savannah, Noshin, Deion, Lottie, Carl, Monica)
- Demonstrate PID capabilities using muon, electron and pion beam data
- Comparison to simulation
Scintillators
Scintillator efficiencies (People: Eric, Brian)
- Measure MIP efficiency in both preshower and trigger scintillators
Timing resolution (People: Eric, Brian)
- Measure relative timing resolution of both preshower and trigger scintillators
- If possible study calorimeter signals as well
Tracker studies
Tracker efficiency (People: Tobias, Savannah, Andrea)
- Use large sample of muon to make detailed hit efficiency map of tracker modules
- Measure middle layer hit efficiency as function of bias voltage and threshold setting
Backsplash from calorimeter (People: Tobias)
- Measure tracker hit occupancy in electron beam events as a function of preshower material
Tracker alignment (People: Markus, Tomohiro, Xin, Hao, Ke)
- Use muon beam data (and probably cosmic data) to make first alignment for the IFT
- Compare to metrology results
- Extend to other stations using cosmic data
Tracker clustering (People: Ke and Shih-Chieh)
- Measure average cluster size and compare to simulation
Other Information
- At high energy the actual beam energy is lower than nominal due to synchrotron radiation. The mapping is:
- Descriptions of the reconstruction tags used to reconstruct the data are described at FaserReleases.
--
BrianPetersen - 2021-08-09